fbpx
Wikipedia

Little Boy

"Little Boy" was the type of atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 during World War II, making it the first nuclear weapon used in warfare. The bomb was dropped by the Boeing B-29 Superfortress Enola Gay piloted by Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, Jr., commander of the 509th Composite Group of the United States Army Air Forces and Captain Robert A. Lewis. It exploded with an energy of approximately 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ) and caused widespread death and destruction throughout the city. The Hiroshima bombing was the second man-made nuclear explosion in history, after the Trinity nuclear test.

Little Boy
A post-war Little Boy model
TypeNuclear weapon
Place of originUnited States
Production history
DesignerLos Alamos Laboratory
Manufacturer
  • Naval Gun Factory,
    Washington, D.C
  • Naval Ordnance Plant,
    Center Line, Michigan
  • Expert Tool and Die Company,
    Detroit, Michigan
Produced1945–1947
No. built33
Specifications
Mass9,700 pounds (4,400 kg)
Length10 feet (3.0 m)
Diameter28 inches (71 cm)

FillingHighly enriched uranium
Filling weight64 kg
Blast yield15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ)

Little Boy was developed by Lieutenant Commander Francis Birch's group at the Manhattan Project's Los Alamos Laboratory during World War II, a reworking of their unsuccessful Thin Man nuclear bomb. Like Thin Man, it was a gun-type fission weapon, but it derived its explosive power from the nuclear fission of uranium-235, whereas Thin Man was based on fission of plutonium-239. Fission was accomplished by shooting a hollow cylinder (the "bullet") onto a solid cylinder of the same material (the "target") by means of a charge of nitrocellulose propellant powder. It contained 64 kg (141 lb) of highly enriched uranium, although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission. Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design.

After the war ended, it was not expected that the inefficient Little Boy design would ever again be required, and many plans and diagrams were destroyed. However, by mid-1946, the Hanford Site reactors began suffering badly from the Wigner effect, the dislocation of atoms in a solid caused by neutron radiation, and plutonium became scarce, so six Little Boy assemblies were produced at Sandia Base. The Navy Bureau of Ordnance built another 25 Little Boy assemblies in 1947 for use by the Lockheed P2V Neptune nuclear strike aircraft which could be launched from the Midway-class aircraft carriers. All the Little Boy units were withdrawn from service by the end of January 1951.

Naming

Physicist Robert Serber named the first two atomic bomb designs during World War II based on their shapes: Thin Man and Fat Man. The "Thin Man" was a long, thin device and its name came from the Dashiell Hammett detective novel and series of movies about The Thin Man. The "Fat Man" was round and fat so it was named after Kasper Gutman, a rotund character in Hammett's 1930 novel The Maltese Falcon, played by Sydney Greenstreet in the 1941 film version. Little Boy was named by others as an allusion to Thin Man since it was based on its design.[1]

Development

Because uranium-235 was known to be fissionable, it was the first material pursued in the approach to bomb development. As the first design developed (as well as the first deployed for combat), it is sometimes known as the Mark I.[2] The vast majority of the work came in the form of the isotope enrichment of the uranium necessary for the weapon, since uranium-235 makes up only 1 part in 140 of natural uranium.[3] Enrichment was performed at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, where the electromagnetic separation plant, known as Y-12, became fully operational in March 1944.[4] The first shipments of highly enriched uranium were sent to the Los Alamos Laboratory in June 1944.[5]

Most of the uranium necessary for the production of the bomb came from the Shinkolobwe mine in the Belgian Congo, and was made available thanks to the foresight of the CEO of the High Katanga Mining Union, Edgar Sengier, who had approximately 1,200 short tons (1,100 t) of uranium ore transported to a warehouse in Staten Island, New York in 1940.[6][7][8] At least part of the 1,200 short tons (1,100 t) in addition to the uranium ore and uranium oxide captured by the Alsos Mission in 1944 and 1945 went to Oak Ridge for enrichment,[9] as did 1,232 pounds (559 kg) of uranium oxide captured on the Japan-bound German submarine U-234 after Germany's surrender in May 1945.[10]

 
As part of Project Alberta, Commander A. Francis Birch (left) assembles the bomb while physicist Norman Ramsey watches. This is one of the rare photos where the inside of the bomb can be seen.

Little Boy was a simplification of Thin Man, the previous gun-type fission weapon design. Thin Man, 17 feet (5.2 m) long, was designed to use plutonium, so it was also more than capable of using enriched uranium. The Thin Man design was abandoned after experiments by Emilio G. Segrè and his P-5 Group at Los Alamos on the newly reactor-produced plutonium from Oak Ridge and the Hanford site showed that it contained impurities in the form of the isotope plutonium-240. This has a far higher spontaneous fission rate and radioactivity than the cyclotron-produced plutonium on which the original measurements had been made, and its inclusion in reactor-bred plutonium (needed for bomb-making due to the quantities required) appeared unavoidable. This meant that the background fission rate of the plutonium was so high that it would be highly likely the plutonium would predetonate and blow itself apart in the initial forming of a critical mass.[11]

In July 1944, almost all research at Los Alamos was redirected to the implosion-type plutonium weapon. Overall responsibility for the uranium gun-type weapon was assigned to Captain William S. Parsons's Ordnance (O) Division. All the design, development, and technical work at Los Alamos was consolidated under Lieutenant Commander Francis Birch's group.[12] In contrast to the plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapon and the plutonium gun-type fission weapon, the uranium gun-type weapon was straightforward if not trivial to design. The concept was pursued so that in case of a failure to develop a plutonium bomb, it would still be possible to use the gun principle. The gun-type design henceforth had to work with enriched uranium only, and this allowed the Thin Man design to be greatly simplified. A high-velocity gun was no longer required, and a simpler weapon could be substituted. The simplified weapon was short enough to fit into a B-29 bomb bay.[13]

The design specifications were completed in February 1945, and contracts were let to build the components. Three different plants were used so that no one would have a copy of the complete design. The gun and breech were made by the Naval Gun Factory in Washington, D.C.; the target case and some other components by the Naval Ordnance Plant in Center Line, Michigan; and the tail fairing and mounting brackets by the Expert Tool and Die Company in Detroit, Michigan.[14] The bomb, except for the uranium payload, was ready at the beginning of May 1945.[15] Manhattan District Engineer Kenneth Nichols expected on 1 May 1945 to have enriched uranium "for one weapon before August 1 and a second one sometime in December", assuming the second weapon would be a gun-type; designing an implosion bomb for enriched uranium was considered, and this would increase the production rate.[16] The enriched uranium projectile was completed on 15 June, and the target on 24 July.[17] The target and bomb pre-assemblies (partly assembled bombs without the fissile components) left Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, California, on 16 July aboard the heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis, arriving on 26 July.[18] The target inserts followed by air on 30 July.[17]

Although all of its components had been tested,[17] no full test of a gun-type nuclear weapon occurred before the Little Boy was dropped over Hiroshima. The only test explosion of a nuclear weapon concept had been of an implosion-type device employing plutonium as its fissile material, and took place on 16 July 1945 at the Trinity nuclear test. There were several reasons for not testing a Little Boy type of device. Primarily, there was little enriched uranium as compared with the relatively large amount of plutonium which, it was expected, could be produced by the Hanford Site reactors.[19] Additionally, the weapon design was simple enough that it was only deemed necessary to do laboratory tests with the gun-type assembly. Unlike the implosion design, which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges, the gun-type design was considered almost certain to work.[20]

Though Little Boy incorporated various safety mechanisms, an accidental detonation was nonetheless possible. For example, should the bomber carrying the device crash then the hollow "bullet" could be driven into the "target" cylinder, detonating the bomb or at least releasing massive amounts of radiation; tests showed that this would require a highly unlikely impact of 500 times the force of gravity.[21] Another concern was that a crash and fire could trigger the explosives.[22] If immersed in water, the uranium components were subject to a neutron moderator effect, which would not cause an explosion but would release radioactive contamination. For this reason, pilots were advised to crash on land rather than at sea.[21]

Design

 
The "gun" assembly method. When the hollow uranium projectile was driven onto the target cylinder, a nuclear explosion resulted.
 
Two Little Boy type bombs with casings open.

The Little Boy was 120 inches (300 cm) in length, 28 inches (71 cm) in diameter and weighed approximately 9,700 pounds (4,400 kg).[23] The design used the gun method to explosively force a hollow sub-critical mass of enriched uranium and a solid target cylinder together into a super-critical mass, initiating a nuclear chain reaction.[24] This was accomplished by shooting one piece of the uranium onto the other by means of four cylindrical silk bags of cordite powder. This was a widely used smokeless propellant consisting of a mixture of 65 percent nitrocellulose, 30 percent nitroglycerine, 3 percent petroleum jelly, and 2 percent carbamite that was extruded into tubular granules. This gave it a high surface area and a rapid burning area, and could attain pressures of up to 40,000 pounds per square inch (280,000 kPa). Cordite for the wartime Little Boy was sourced from Canada; propellant for post-war Little Boys was obtained from the Picatinny Arsenal.[25] The bomb contained 64 kg (141 lb) of enriched uranium. Most was enriched to 89% but some was only 50% uranium-235, for an average enrichment of 80%.[24] Less than a kilogram of uranium underwent nuclear fission, and of this mass only 0.7 g (0.025 oz) was transformed into several forms of energy, mostly kinetic energy, but also heat and radiation.[26]

Assembly details

Inside the weapon, the uranium-235 material was divided into two parts, following the gun principle: the "projectile" and the "target". The projectile was a hollow cylinder with 60% of the total mass (38.5 kg (85 lb)). It consisted of a stack of nine uranium rings, each 6.25-inch (159 mm) in diameter with a 4-inch (100 mm) bore in the center, and a total length of 7 inches (180 mm), pressed together into the front end of a thin-walled projectile 16.25 inches (413 mm) long. Filling in the remainder of the space behind these rings in the projectile was a tungsten carbide disc with a steel back. At ignition, the projectile slug was pushed 42 inches (1,100 mm) along the 72-inch (1,800 mm) long, 6.5-inch (170 mm) smooth-bore gun barrel. The slug "insert" was a 4 inches (100 mm) cylinder, 7 inches (180 mm) in length with a 1 inch (25 mm) axial hole. The slug comprised 40% of the total fissile mass (25.6 kg or 56 lb). The insert was a stack of six washer-like uranium discs somewhat thicker than the projectile rings that were slid over a 1 inch (25 mm) rod. This rod then extended forward through the tungsten carbide tamper plug, impact-absorbing anvil, and nose plug backstop, eventually protruding out of the front of the bomb casing. This entire target assembly was secured at both ends with locknuts.[27][28]

When the hollow-front projectile reached the target and slid over the target insert, the assembled super-critical mass of uranium would be completely surrounded by a tamper and neutron reflector of tungsten carbide and steel, both materials having a combined mass of 2,300 kg (5,100 lb).[29] Neutron initiators inside the assembly were activated by the impact of the projectile into the target.[30]

 

Counter-intuitive design

For the first fifty years after 1945, every published description and drawing of the Little Boy mechanism assumed that a small, solid projectile was fired into the center of a larger, stationary target.[31] However, critical mass considerations dictated that in Little Boy the more extensive, hollow piece would be the projectile. The assembled fissile core had more than two critical masses of uranium-235. This required one of the two pieces to have more than one critical mass, with the larger piece avoiding criticality prior to assembly by means of shape and minimal contact with the neutron-reflecting tungsten carbide tamper.

A hole in the center of the larger piece dispersed the mass and increased the surface area, allowing more fission neutrons to escape, thus preventing a premature chain reaction.[32] But, for this larger, hollow piece to have minimal contact with the tamper, it must be the projectile, since only the projectile's back end was in contact with the tamper prior to detonation. The rest of the tungsten carbide surrounded the sub-critical mass target cylinder (called the "insert" by the designers) with air space between it and the insert. This arrangement packs the maximum amount of fissile material into a gun-assembly design.[32]

Fuze system

 
Arming plugs for a Little Boy type atomic bomb on display at the National Air and Space Museum's Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center.

The fuzing system was designed to trigger at the most destructive altitude, which calculations suggested was 580 meters (1,900 ft). It employed a three-stage interlock system:[33]

  • A timer ensured that the bomb would not explode until at least fifteen seconds after release, one-quarter of the predicted fall time, to ensure the safety of the aircraft. The timer was activated when the electrical pull-out plugs connecting it to the airplane pulled loose as the bomb fell, switching it to its internal 24–volt battery and starting the timer. At the end of the 15 seconds, the bomb would be 3,600 feet (1,100 m) from the aircraft, and the radar altimeters were powered up and responsibility was passed to the barometric stage.[33]
  • The purpose of the barometric stage was to delay activating the radar altimeter firing command circuit until near detonation altitude. A thin metallic membrane enclosing a vacuum chamber (a similar design is still used today in old-fashioned wall barometers) gradually deformed as ambient air pressure increased during descent. The barometric fuze was not considered accurate enough to detonate the bomb at the precise ignition height, because air pressure varies with local conditions. When the bomb reached the design height for this stage (reportedly 2,000 meters, 6,600 ft), the membrane closed a circuit, activating the radar altimeters. The barometric stage was added because of a worry that external radar signals might detonate the bomb too early.[33]
  • Two or more redundant radar altimeters were used to reliably detect final altitude. When the altimeters sensed the correct height, the firing switch closed, igniting the three BuOrd Mk15, Mod 1 Navy gun primers in the breech plug, which set off the charge consisting of four silk powder bags each containing 2 pounds (0.9 kg) of WM slotted-tube cordite. This launched the uranium projectile towards the opposite end of the gun barrel at an eventual muzzle velocity of 300 meters per second (980 ft/s). Approximately 10 milliseconds later the chain reaction occurred, lasting less than 1 microsecond. The radar altimeters used were modified U.S. Army Air Corps APS-13 tail warning radars, nicknamed "Archie", normally used to warn a fighter pilot of another plane approaching from behind.[33]

Rehearsals

 
Little Boy in the bomb pit on Tinian island, before being loaded into Enola Gay's bomb bay. A section of the bomb bay door is visible on the top right.

The Little Boy pre-assemblies were designated L-1, L-2, L-3, L-4, L-5, L-6, L-7, and L-11. L-1, L-2, L-5, and L-6 were expended in test drops. The first drop test was conducted with L-1 on 23 July 1945. It was dropped over the sea near Tinian in order to test the radar altimeter by the B-29 later known as Big Stink, piloted by Colonel Paul W. Tibbets, the commander of the 509th Composite Group. Two more drop tests over the sea were made on 24 and 25 July, using the L-2 and L-5 units in order to test all components. Tibbets was the pilot for both missions, but this time the bomber used was the one subsequently known as Jabit. L-6 was used as a dress rehearsal on 29 July. The B-29 Next Objective, piloted by Major Charles W. Sweeney, flew to Iwo Jima, where emergency procedures for loading the bomb onto a standby aircraft were practiced. This rehearsal was repeated on 31 July, but this time L-6 was reloaded onto a different B-29, Enola Gay, piloted by Tibbets, and the bomb was test dropped near Tinian. L-11 was the assembly used for the Hiroshima bomb.[34][35]

Bombing of Hiroshima

 
Enola Gay after Hiroshima mission, entering hardstand. It is in its 6th Bombardment Group livery, with victor number 82 visible on fuselage just forward of the tail fin.

Parsons, the Enola Gay's weaponeer, was concerned about the possibility of an accidental detonation if the plane crashed on takeoff, so he decided not to load the four cordite powder bags into the gun breech until the aircraft was in flight. After takeoff, Parsons and his assistant, Second Lieutenant Morris R. Jeppson, made their way into the bomb bay along the narrow catwalk on the port side. Jeppson held a flashlight while Parsons disconnected the primer wires, removed the breech plug, inserted the powder bags, replaced the breech plug, and reconnected the wires. Before climbing to altitude on approach to the target, Jeppson switched the three safety plugs between the electrical connectors of the internal battery and the firing mechanism from green to red. The bomb was then fully armed. Jeppson monitored the bomb's circuits.[36]

 
The mushroom cloud over Hiroshima after the dropping of Little Boy

The bomb was dropped at approximately 08:15 (JST) on 6 August 1945. After falling for 44.4 seconds, the time and barometric triggers started the firing mechanism. The detonation happened at an altitude of 1,968 ± 50 feet (600 ± 15 m). It was less powerful than the Fat Man, which was dropped on Nagasaki, but the damage and the number of victims at Hiroshima were much higher, as Hiroshima was on flat terrain, while the hypocenter of Nagasaki lay in a small valley. According to figures published in 1945, 66,000 people were killed as a direct result of the Hiroshima blast, and 69,000 were injured to varying degrees.[37] Later estimates put the deaths as high as 140,000 people.[38] The United States Strategic Bombing Survey estimated that out of 24,158 Imperial Japanese Army soldiers in Hiroshima at the time of the bombing, 6,789 were killed or missing as a result of the bombing.[39]

The exact measurement of the explosive yield of the bomb was problematic since the weapon had never been tested. President Harry S. Truman officially announced that the yield was 20 kilotons of TNT (84 TJ). This was based on Parsons's visual assessment that the blast was greater than what he had seen at the Trinity nuclear test. Since that had been estimated at 18 kilotons of TNT (75 TJ), speech writers rounded up to 20 kilotons. Further discussion was then suppressed, for fear of lessening the impact of the bomb on the Japanese. Data had been collected by Luis Alvarez, Harold Agnew, and Lawrence H. Johnston on the instrument plane, The Great Artiste, but this was not used to calculate the yield at the time.[40]

After hostilities ended, a survey team from the Manhattan Project that included William Penney, Robert Serber, and George T. Reynolds was sent to Hiroshima to evaluate the effects of the blast. From evaluating the effects on objects and structures, Penney concluded that the yield was 12 ± 1 kilotons.[41] Later calculations based on charring pointed to a yield of 13 to 14 kilotons.[42] In 1953, Frederick Reines calculated the yield as 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ).[40] This figure became the official yield.[43]

Project Ichiban

In 1962, scientists at Los Alamos created a mockup of Little Boy known as "Project Ichiban" in order to answer some of the unanswered questions about the exact radiation output of the bomb, which would be useful for setting benchmarks for interpreting the relationship between radiation exposure and later health outcomes. But it failed to clear up all the issues. In 1982, Los Alamos created a replica Little Boy from the original drawings and specifications. This was then tested with enriched uranium but in a safe configuration that would not cause a nuclear explosion. A hydraulic lift was used to move the projectile, and experiments were run to assess neutron emission.[44] Based on this and the data from The Great Artiste, the yield was estimated at 16.6 ± 0.3 kilotons.[45] After considering many estimation methods, a 1985 report concluded that the yield was 15 kilotons of TNT (63 TJ) ± 20%.[43]

Physical effects

The General Effects of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a US Air Force film.

After being selected in April 1945, Hiroshima was spared conventional bombing to serve as a pristine target, where the effects of a nuclear bomb on an undamaged city could be observed.[46] While damage could be studied later, the energy yield of the untested Little Boy design could be determined only at the moment of detonation, using instruments dropped by parachute from a plane flying in formation with the one that dropped the bomb. Radio-transmitted data from these instruments indicated a yield of about 15 kilotons.[43]

Comparing this yield to the observed damage produced a rule of thumb called the 5 pounds per square inch (34 kPa) lethal area rule. Approximately all the people inside the area where the shock wave carried such an overpressure or greater would be killed.[47] At Hiroshima, that area was 3.5 kilometres (2.2 mi) in diameter.[48]

The damage came from three main effects: blast, fire, and radiation.[49]

Blast

The blast from a nuclear bomb is the result of X-ray-heated air (the fireball) sending a shock wave or pressure wave in all directions, initially at a velocity greater than the speed of sound,[50] analogous to thunder generated by lightning. Knowledge about urban blast destruction is based largely on studies of Little Boy at Hiroshima. Nagasaki buildings suffered similar damage at similar distances, but the Nagasaki bomb detonated 3.2 kilometres (2.0 mi) from the city center over hilly terrain that was partially bare of buildings.[51]

 
Frame house in 1953 nuclear test, 5 psi overpressure

In Hiroshima, almost everything within 1.6 kilometres (1.0 mi) of the point directly under the explosion was completely destroyed, except for about 50 heavily reinforced, earthquake-resistant concrete buildings, only the shells of which remained standing. Most were completely gutted, with their windows, doors, sashes, and frames ripped out.[52] The perimeter of severe blast damage approximately followed the 5 psi (34 kPa) contour at 1.8 kilometres (1.1 mi).

Later test explosions of nuclear weapons with houses and other test structures nearby confirmed the 5 psi overpressure threshold. Ordinary urban buildings experiencing it were crushed, toppled, or gutted by the force of air pressure. The picture at right shows the effects of a nuclear-bomb-generated 5 psi pressure wave on a test structure in Nevada in 1953.[53]

A major effect of this kind of structural damage was that it created fuel for fires that were started simultaneously throughout the severe destruction region.

Fire

The first effect of the explosion was blinding light, accompanied by radiant heat from the fireball. The Hiroshima fireball was 370 metres (1,200 ft) in diameter, with a surface temperature of 6,000 °C (10,830 °F), about the same temperature as at the surface of the sun.[54] Near ground zero, everything flammable burst into flame. One famous, anonymous Hiroshima victim, sitting on stone steps 260 metres (850 ft) from the hypocenter, left only a shadow, having absorbed the fireball heat that permanently bleached the surrounding stone.[55] Simultaneous fires were started throughout the blast-damaged area by fireball heat and by overturned stoves and furnaces, electrical shorts, etc. Twenty minutes after the detonation, these fires had merged into a firestorm, pulling in surface air from all directions to feed an inferno which consumed everything flammable.[56]

 
Hiroshima blast and fire damage, U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey map

The Hiroshima firestorm was roughly 3.2 kilometres (2.0 mi) in diameter, corresponding closely to the severe blast damage zone. (See the USSBS[57] map, right.) Blast-damaged buildings provided fuel for the fire. Structural lumber and furniture were splintered and scattered about. Debris-choked roads obstructed firefighters. Broken gas pipes fueled the fire, and broken water pipes rendered hydrants useless.[56] At Nagasaki, the fires failed to merge into a single firestorm, and the fire-damaged area was only one fourth as great as at Hiroshima, due in part to a southwest wind that pushed the fires away from the city.[58]

As the map shows, the Hiroshima firestorm jumped natural firebreaks (river channels), as well as prepared firebreaks. The spread of fire stopped only when it reached the edge of the blast-damaged area, encountering less available fuel.[59] The Manhattan Project report on Hiroshima estimated that 60% of immediate deaths were caused by fire, but with the caveat that "many persons near the center of explosion suffered fatal injuries from more than one of the bomb effects."[60]

Radiation

Local fallout is dust and ash from a bomb crater, contaminated with radioactive fission products. It falls to earth downwind of the crater and can produce, with radiation alone, a lethal area much larger than that from blast and fire. With an air burst, the fission products rise into the stratosphere, where they dissipate and become part of the global environment. Because Little Boy was an air burst 580 metres (1,900 ft) above the ground, there was no bomb crater and no local radioactive fallout.[61]

However, a burst of intense neutron and gamma radiation came directly from the fission of the uranium. Its lethal radius was approximately 1.3 kilometres (0.8 mi),[62][63] covering about half of the firestorm area. An estimated 30% of immediate fatalities were people who received lethal doses of this direct radiation, but died in the firestorm before their radiation injuries would have become apparent. Over 6,000 people survived the blast and fire, but died of radiation injuries.[60] Among injured survivors, 30% had radiation injuries[64] from which they recovered, but with a lifelong increase in cancer risk.[65][66] To date, no radiation-related evidence of heritable diseases has been observed among the survivors' children.[67][68][69]

Conventional weapon equivalent

Although Little Boy exploded with the energy equivalent of 16,000 tons of TNT, the Strategic Bombing Survey estimated that the same blast and fire effect could have been caused by 2,100 tons of conventional bombs: "220 B-29s carrying 1,200 tons of incendiary bombs, 400 tons of high-explosive bombs, and 500 tons of anti-personnel fragmentation bombs."[70] Since the target was spread across a two-dimensional plane, the vertical component of a single spherical nuclear explosion was largely wasted. A cluster bomb pattern of smaller explosions would have been a more energy-efficient match to the target.[70]

Post-war

 
One of five casings built for the Little Boy bomb used on Hiroshima on display at the Imperial War Museum in London during 2015

When the war ended, it was not expected that the inefficient Little Boy design would ever again be required, and many plans and diagrams were destroyed. However, by mid-1946 the Hanford Site reactors were suffering badly from the Wigner effect. Faced with the prospect of no more plutonium for new cores and no more polonium for the initiators for the cores that had already been produced, the Director of the Manhattan Project, Major General Leslie R. Groves, ordered that some Little Boys be prepared as an interim measure until a solution could be found. No Little Boy assemblies were available, and no comprehensive set of diagrams of the Little Boy could be found, although there were drawings of the various components, and stocks of spare parts.[71][72]

At Sandia Base, three Army officers, Captains Albert Bethel, Richard Meyer, and Bobbie Griffin attempted to re-create the Little Boy. They were supervised by Harlow W. Russ, an expert on Little Boy who served with Project Alberta on Tinian, and was now leader of the Z-11 Group of the Los Alamos Laboratory's Z Division at Sandia. Gradually, they managed to locate the correct drawings and parts, and figured out how they went together. Eventually, they built six Little Boy assemblies. Although the casings, barrels, and components were tested, no enriched uranium was supplied for the bombs. By early 1947, the problem caused by the Wigner effect was on its way to solution, and the three officers were reassigned.[71][72]

The Navy Bureau of Ordnance built 25 Little Boy assemblies in 1947 for use by the nuclear-capable Lockheed P2V Neptune aircraft carrier aircraft (which could be launched from but not land on the Midway-class aircraft carriers). Components were produced by the Naval Ordnance Plants in Pocatello, Idaho, and Louisville, Kentucky. Enough fissionable material was available by 1948 to build ten projectiles and targets, although there were only enough initiators for six.[73] All the Little Boy units were withdrawn from service by the end of January 1951.[74][75]

The Smithsonian Institution displayed a Little Boy (complete, except for enriched uranium), until 1986. The Department of Energy took the weapon from the museum to remove its inner components, so the bombs could not be stolen and detonated with fissile material. The government returned the emptied casing to the Smithsonian in 1993. Three other disarmed bombs are on display in the United States; another is at the Imperial War Museum in London.[31]

Notes

  1. ^ Serber & Crease 1998, p. 104.
  2. ^ Hansen 1995, p. V-105.
  3. ^ Jones 1985, p. 9.
  4. ^ Jones 1985, p. 138.
  5. ^ Jones 1985, p. 143.
  6. ^ Jones 1985, pp. 64–65.
  7. ^ Groves 1962, p. 34.
  8. ^ Rhodes 1986, p. 427.
  9. ^ Rhodes 1995, pp. 160–161.
  10. ^ "The Sensational Surrender of Four Nazi U-boats at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard". New England Historical Society. 15 May 2015. Retrieved 19 September 2018.
  11. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 228.
  12. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 245–249.
  13. ^ Rhodes 1986, p. 541.
  14. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 257.
  15. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 262.
  16. ^ Nichols 1987, pp. 175–176.
  17. ^ a b c Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 265.
  18. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, p. 30.
  19. ^ Hansen 1995, pp. 111–112.
  20. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 293.
  21. ^ a b Hansen 1995, p. 113.
  22. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 333.
  23. ^ Gosling 1999, p. 51.
  24. ^ a b Coster-Mullen 2012, p. 18.
  25. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, p. 27.
  26. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 12.
  27. ^ Sublette, Carey. "Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions, Section 8.0: The First Nuclear Weapons". Retrieved 29 August 2013.
  28. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, pp. 18–19, 27.
  29. ^ Bernstein 2007, p. 133.
  30. ^ Hoddeson et al. 1993, pp. 263–265.
  31. ^ a b Samuels 2008.
  32. ^ a b Coster-Mullen 2012, pp. 23–24.
  33. ^ a b c d Hansen 1995a, pp. 2–5.
  34. ^ Campbell 2005, pp. 46, 80.
  35. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, pp. 100–101.
  36. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, pp. 34–35.
  37. ^ The Manhattan Engineer District (29 June 1946). "The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki". Project Gutenberg (Public Domain). p. 3.
  38. ^ Alex Wellerstein (4 August 2020). "Counting the Dead at Hiroshima and Nagasaki". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
  39. ^ W.F. Craven and J.L. Cate, eds. (1983). The Army Air Forces in World War II: Volume 5 - The Pacific: MATTERHORN to Nagasaki, June 1944 to August 1945. Office of Air Force History. p. 723.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter (link)
  40. ^ a b Hoddeson et al. 1993, p. 393.
  41. ^ Malik 1985, pp. 18–20.
  42. ^ Malik 1985, p. 21.
  43. ^ a b c Malik 1985, p. 1.
  44. ^ Coster-Mullen 2012, pp. 86–87.
  45. ^ Malik 1985, p. 16.
  46. ^ Groves 1962, p. 267, "To enable us to assess accurately the effects of the [nuclear] bomb, the targets should not have been previously damaged by air raids." Four cities were chosen, including Hiroshima and Kyoto. War Secretary Stimson vetoed Kyoto, and Nagasaki was substituted. p. 275, "When our target cities were first selected, an order was sent to the Army Air Force in Guam not to bomb them without special authority from the War Department.".
  47. ^ Glasstone 1962, p. 629.
  48. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer.
  49. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 1.
  50. ^ Diacon 1984, p. 18.
  51. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 300, 301.
  52. ^ The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1946, p. 14.
  53. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 179.
  54. ^ Nuclear Weapon Thermal Effects 1998.
  55. ^ Human Shadow Etched in Stone.
  56. ^ a b Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 300–304.
  57. ^ D'Olier 1946, pp. 22–25.
  58. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 304.
  59. ^ The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1946, pp. 21–23.
  60. ^ a b The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1946, p. 21.
  61. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, p. 409 "An air burst, by definition, is one taking place at such a height above the earth that no appreciable quantities of surface material are taken up into the fireball. ... the deposition of early fallout from an air burst will generally not be significant. An air burst, however, may produce some induced radioactive contamination in the general vicinity of ground zero as a result of neutron capture by elements in the soil." p. 36, "at Hiroshima ... injuries due to fallout were completely absent.".
  62. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. Chapter VIII and the 'Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer'.
  63. ^ Wellerstein, Alex. "NUKEMAP". nuclearsecrecy.com. Alex Wellerstein. Retrieved 28 July 2021.
  64. ^ Glasstone & Dolan 1977, pp. 545, 546.
  65. ^ Richardson RR 2009.
  66. ^ "The ongoing research into the effects of radiation". Radio Netherlands Archives. 31 July 2005. Retrieved 16 December 2018.
  67. ^ Genetic Effects.
  68. ^ Izumi BJC 2003.
  69. ^ Izumi IJC 2003.
  70. ^ a b D'Olier 1946, p. 24.
  71. ^ a b Coster-Mullen 2012, p. 85.
  72. ^ a b Abrahamson & Carew 2002, pp. 41–42.
  73. ^ Hansen 1995, pp. 116–118.
  74. ^ Hansen 1995, p. 3.
  75. ^ "Chart of Strategic Nuclear Bombs". strategic-air-command.com.

References

  • Abrahamson, James L.; Carew, Paul H. (2002). Vanguard of American Atomic Deterrence. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger. ISBN 0-275-97819-2. OCLC 49859889.
  • (PDF). The Manhattan Engineer District. 29 June 1946. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 April 2012. Retrieved 6 November 2013. This report can also be found here and here.
  • Bernstein, Jeremy (2007). Nuclear Weapons: What You Need to Know. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-88408-2.
  • Campbell, Richard H. (2005). The Silverplate Bombers: A History and Registry of the Enola Gay and Other B-29s Configured to Carry Atomic Bombs. Jefferson, North Carolina: McFarland & Company. ISBN 0-7864-2139-8. OCLC 58554961.
  • Coster-Mullen, John (2012). Atom Bombs: The Top Secret Inside Story of Little Boy and Fat Man. Waukesha, Wisconsin: J. Coster-Mullen. OCLC 298514167.
  • Diacon, Diane (1984). Residential Housing and Nuclear Attack. London: Croom Helm. ISBN 978-0-7099-0868-5.
  • D'Olier, Franklin, ed. (1946). United States Strategic Bombing Survey, Summary Report (Pacific War). Washington: United States Government Printing Office. Retrieved 6 November 2013. This report can also be found here.
  • "Genetic Effects: Question #7". Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  • Glasstone, Samuel (1962). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Revised Edition. United States: United States Department of Defense and United States Atomic Energy Commission. ISBN 978-1258793555.
  • Glasstone, Samuel; Dolan, Philip J. (1977). The Effects of Nuclear Weapons, Third Edition. United States: United States Department of Defense and United States Department of Energy. ISBN 978-1603220163.
  • Gosling, F. G. (1999). The Manhattan Project: Making the Atomic Bomb. Diane Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7881-7880-1.
  • Groves, Leslie R. (1962). Now it Can Be Told: the Story of the Manhattan Project. New York: Da Capo Press (1975 reprint). ISBN 0-306-70738-1.
  • Hansen, Chuck (1995). Volume V: US Nuclear Weapons Histories. Swords of Armageddon: US Nuclear Weapons Development since 1945. Sunnyvale, California: Chuckelea Publications. ISBN 978-0-9791915-0-3. OCLC 231585284.
  • Hansen, Chuck (1995a). Volume VII: The Development of US Nuclear Weapons. Swords of Armageddon: US Nuclear Weapons Development since 1945. Sunnyvale, California: Chuckelea Publications. ISBN 978-0-9791915-7-2. OCLC 231585284.
  • Hoddeson, Lillian; Henriksen, Paul W.; Meade, Roger A.; Westfall, Catherine L. (1993). Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-44132-3. OCLC 26764320.
  • "Human Shadow Etched in Stone". Photographic Display. Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  • Izumi S, Koyama K, Soda M, Suyama A (November 2003). "Cancer incidence in children and young adults did not increase relative to parental exposure to atomic bombs". British Journal of Cancer. 89 (9): 1709–1713. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601322. PMC 2394417. PMID 14583774.
  • Izumi S, Suyama A, Koyama K (November 2003). "Radiation-related mortality among offspring of atomic bomb survivors: a half-century of follow-up". International Journal of Cancer. 107 (2): 292–297. doi:10.1002/ijc.11400. PMID 12949810. S2CID 23902907.
  • Jones, Vincent (1985). (PDF). Washington, D.C.: United States Army Center of Military History. OCLC 10913875. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 October 2014. Retrieved 25 August 2013.
  • Malik, John S. (1985). "The yields of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear explosions" (PDF). Los Alamos National Laboratory report number LA-8819. Retrieved 6 November 2013.
  • Nichols, Kenneth (1987). The Road to Trinity: A Personal Account of How America's Nuclear Policies Were Made. New York: William Morrow. ISBN 068806910X. OCLC 15223648.
  • . Special Weapons Primer, Weapons of Mass Destruction. Federation of American Scientists. 1998. Archived from the original on 22 April 2013. Retrieved 5 November 2013.
  • Rhodes, Richard (1986). The Making of the Atomic Bomb. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0-684-81378-5. OCLC 13793436.
  • Rhodes, Richard (1995). Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb. New York: Touchstone. ISBN 0-684-82414-0.
  • Richardson, David; et al. (September 2009). "Ionizing Radiation and Leukemia Mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1950–2000". Radiation Research. 172 (3): 368–382. Bibcode:2009RadR..172..368R. doi:10.1667/RR1801.1. PMID 19708786. S2CID 12463437.
  • Samuels, David (15 December 2008). "Atomic John: A truck driver uncovers secrets about the first nuclear bombs". The New Yorker. Retrieved 30 August 2013.
  • Serber, Robert; Crease, Robert P. (1998). Peace & War: Reminiscences of a Life on the Frontiers of Science. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231105460. OCLC 37631186.

External links

  • Little Boy description at Carey Sublette's NuclearWeaponArchive.org
  • Nuclear Files.org Definition and explanation of 'Little Boy'
  • The Nuclear Weapon Archive
  • Simulation of "Little Boy" an interactive simulation of "Little Boy"
  • Little Boy 3D Model
  • Hiroshima & Nagasaki Remembered information about preparation and dropping the Little Boy bomb
  • Little boy Nuclear Bomb at Imperial War museum London UK (jpg)

little, this, article, about, atomic, bomb, that, dropped, hiroshima, other, uses, disambiguation, type, atomic, bomb, dropped, japanese, city, hiroshima, august, 1945, during, world, making, first, nuclear, weapon, used, warfare, bomb, dropped, boeing, superf. This article is about the atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima For other uses see Little Boy disambiguation Little Boy was the type of atomic bomb dropped on the Japanese city of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 during World War II making it the first nuclear weapon used in warfare The bomb was dropped by the Boeing B 29 Superfortress Enola Gay piloted by Colonel Paul W Tibbets Jr commander of the 509th Composite Group of the United States Army Air Forces and Captain Robert A Lewis It exploded with an energy of approximately 15 kilotons of TNT 63 TJ and caused widespread death and destruction throughout the city The Hiroshima bombing was the second man made nuclear explosion in history after the Trinity nuclear test Little BoyA post war Little Boy modelTypeNuclear weaponPlace of originUnited StatesProduction historyDesignerLos Alamos LaboratoryManufacturerNaval Gun Factory Washington D CNaval Ordnance Plant Center Line MichiganExpert Tool and Die Company Detroit MichiganProduced1945 1947No built33SpecificationsMass9 700 pounds 4 400 kg Length10 feet 3 0 m Diameter28 inches 71 cm FillingHighly enriched uraniumFilling weight64 kgBlast yield15 kilotons of TNT 63 TJ Little Boy was developed by Lieutenant Commander Francis Birch s group at the Manhattan Project s Los Alamos Laboratory during World War II a reworking of their unsuccessful Thin Man nuclear bomb Like Thin Man it was a gun type fission weapon but it derived its explosive power from the nuclear fission of uranium 235 whereas Thin Man was based on fission of plutonium 239 Fission was accomplished by shooting a hollow cylinder the bullet onto a solid cylinder of the same material the target by means of a charge of nitrocellulose propellant powder It contained 64 kg 141 lb of highly enriched uranium although less than a kilogram underwent nuclear fission Its components were fabricated at three different plants so that no one would have a copy of the complete design After the war ended it was not expected that the inefficient Little Boy design would ever again be required and many plans and diagrams were destroyed However by mid 1946 the Hanford Site reactors began suffering badly from the Wigner effect the dislocation of atoms in a solid caused by neutron radiation and plutonium became scarce so six Little Boy assemblies were produced at Sandia Base The Navy Bureau of Ordnance built another 25 Little Boy assemblies in 1947 for use by the Lockheed P2V Neptune nuclear strike aircraft which could be launched from the Midway class aircraft carriers All the Little Boy units were withdrawn from service by the end of January 1951 Contents 1 Naming 2 Development 3 Design 3 1 Assembly details 3 2 Counter intuitive design 3 3 Fuze system 4 Rehearsals 5 Bombing of Hiroshima 5 1 Project Ichiban 6 Physical effects 6 1 Blast 6 2 Fire 6 3 Radiation 6 4 Conventional weapon equivalent 7 Post war 8 Notes 9 References 10 External linksNaming EditPhysicist Robert Serber named the first two atomic bomb designs during World War II based on their shapes Thin Man and Fat Man The Thin Man was a long thin device and its name came from the Dashiell Hammett detective novel and series of movies about The Thin Man The Fat Man was round and fat so it was named after Kasper Gutman a rotund character in Hammett s 1930 novel The Maltese Falcon played by Sydney Greenstreet in the 1941 film version Little Boy was named by others as an allusion to Thin Man since it was based on its design 1 Development EditMain article Manhattan Project Because uranium 235 was known to be fissionable it was the first material pursued in the approach to bomb development As the first design developed as well as the first deployed for combat it is sometimes known as the Mark I 2 The vast majority of the work came in the form of the isotope enrichment of the uranium necessary for the weapon since uranium 235 makes up only 1 part in 140 of natural uranium 3 Enrichment was performed at Oak Ridge Tennessee where the electromagnetic separation plant known as Y 12 became fully operational in March 1944 4 The first shipments of highly enriched uranium were sent to the Los Alamos Laboratory in June 1944 5 Most of the uranium necessary for the production of the bomb came from the Shinkolobwe mine in the Belgian Congo and was made available thanks to the foresight of the CEO of the High Katanga Mining Union Edgar Sengier who had approximately 1 200 short tons 1 100 t of uranium ore transported to a warehouse in Staten Island New York in 1940 6 7 8 At least part of the 1 200 short tons 1 100 t in addition to the uranium ore and uranium oxide captured by the Alsos Mission in 1944 and 1945 went to Oak Ridge for enrichment 9 as did 1 232 pounds 559 kg of uranium oxide captured on the Japan bound German submarine U 234 after Germany s surrender in May 1945 10 As part of Project Alberta Commander A Francis Birch left assembles the bomb while physicist Norman Ramsey watches This is one of the rare photos where the inside of the bomb can be seen Little Boy was a simplification of Thin Man the previous gun type fission weapon design Thin Man 17 feet 5 2 m long was designed to use plutonium so it was also more than capable of using enriched uranium The Thin Man design was abandoned after experiments by Emilio G Segre and his P 5 Group at Los Alamos on the newly reactor produced plutonium from Oak Ridge and the Hanford site showed that it contained impurities in the form of the isotope plutonium 240 This has a far higher spontaneous fission rate and radioactivity than the cyclotron produced plutonium on which the original measurements had been made and its inclusion in reactor bred plutonium needed for bomb making due to the quantities required appeared unavoidable This meant that the background fission rate of the plutonium was so high that it would be highly likely the plutonium would predetonate and blow itself apart in the initial forming of a critical mass 11 In July 1944 almost all research at Los Alamos was redirected to the implosion type plutonium weapon Overall responsibility for the uranium gun type weapon was assigned to Captain William S Parsons s Ordnance O Division All the design development and technical work at Los Alamos was consolidated under Lieutenant Commander Francis Birch s group 12 In contrast to the plutonium implosion type nuclear weapon and the plutonium gun type fission weapon the uranium gun type weapon was straightforward if not trivial to design The concept was pursued so that in case of a failure to develop a plutonium bomb it would still be possible to use the gun principle The gun type design henceforth had to work with enriched uranium only and this allowed the Thin Man design to be greatly simplified A high velocity gun was no longer required and a simpler weapon could be substituted The simplified weapon was short enough to fit into a B 29 bomb bay 13 The design specifications were completed in February 1945 and contracts were let to build the components Three different plants were used so that no one would have a copy of the complete design The gun and breech were made by the Naval Gun Factory in Washington D C the target case and some other components by the Naval Ordnance Plant in Center Line Michigan and the tail fairing and mounting brackets by the Expert Tool and Die Company in Detroit Michigan 14 The bomb except for the uranium payload was ready at the beginning of May 1945 15 Manhattan District Engineer Kenneth Nichols expected on 1 May 1945 to have enriched uranium for one weapon before August 1 and a second one sometime in December assuming the second weapon would be a gun type designing an implosion bomb for enriched uranium was considered and this would increase the production rate 16 The enriched uranium projectile was completed on 15 June and the target on 24 July 17 The target and bomb pre assemblies partly assembled bombs without the fissile components left Hunters Point Naval Shipyard California on 16 July aboard the heavy cruiser USS Indianapolis arriving on 26 July 18 The target inserts followed by air on 30 July 17 Although all of its components had been tested 17 no full test of a gun type nuclear weapon occurred before the Little Boy was dropped over Hiroshima The only test explosion of a nuclear weapon concept had been of an implosion type device employing plutonium as its fissile material and took place on 16 July 1945 at the Trinity nuclear test There were several reasons for not testing a Little Boy type of device Primarily there was little enriched uranium as compared with the relatively large amount of plutonium which it was expected could be produced by the Hanford Site reactors 19 Additionally the weapon design was simple enough that it was only deemed necessary to do laboratory tests with the gun type assembly Unlike the implosion design which required sophisticated coordination of shaped explosive charges the gun type design was considered almost certain to work 20 Though Little Boy incorporated various safety mechanisms an accidental detonation was nonetheless possible For example should the bomber carrying the device crash then the hollow bullet could be driven into the target cylinder detonating the bomb or at least releasing massive amounts of radiation tests showed that this would require a highly unlikely impact of 500 times the force of gravity 21 Another concern was that a crash and fire could trigger the explosives 22 If immersed in water the uranium components were subject to a neutron moderator effect which would not cause an explosion but would release radioactive contamination For this reason pilots were advised to crash on land rather than at sea 21 Design Edit The gun assembly method When the hollow uranium projectile was driven onto the target cylinder a nuclear explosion resulted Two Little Boy type bombs with casings open The Little Boy was 120 inches 300 cm in length 28 inches 71 cm in diameter and weighed approximately 9 700 pounds 4 400 kg 23 The design used the gun method to explosively force a hollow sub critical mass of enriched uranium and a solid target cylinder together into a super critical mass initiating a nuclear chain reaction 24 This was accomplished by shooting one piece of the uranium onto the other by means of four cylindrical silk bags of cordite powder This was a widely used smokeless propellant consisting of a mixture of 65 percent nitrocellulose 30 percent nitroglycerine 3 percent petroleum jelly and 2 percent carbamite that was extruded into tubular granules This gave it a high surface area and a rapid burning area and could attain pressures of up to 40 000 pounds per square inch 280 000 kPa Cordite for the wartime Little Boy was sourced from Canada propellant for post war Little Boys was obtained from the Picatinny Arsenal 25 The bomb contained 64 kg 141 lb of enriched uranium Most was enriched to 89 but some was only 50 uranium 235 for an average enrichment of 80 24 Less than a kilogram of uranium underwent nuclear fission and of this mass only 0 7 g 0 025 oz was transformed into several forms of energy mostly kinetic energy but also heat and radiation 26 Assembly details Edit Inside the weapon the uranium 235 material was divided into two parts following the gun principle the projectile and the target The projectile was a hollow cylinder with 60 of the total mass 38 5 kg 85 lb It consisted of a stack of nine uranium rings each 6 25 inch 159 mm in diameter with a 4 inch 100 mm bore in the center and a total length of 7 inches 180 mm pressed together into the front end of a thin walled projectile 16 25 inches 413 mm long Filling in the remainder of the space behind these rings in the projectile was a tungsten carbide disc with a steel back At ignition the projectile slug was pushed 42 inches 1 100 mm along the 72 inch 1 800 mm long 6 5 inch 170 mm smooth bore gun barrel The slug insert was a 4 inches 100 mm cylinder 7 inches 180 mm in length with a 1 inch 25 mm axial hole The slug comprised 40 of the total fissile mass 25 6 kg or 56 lb The insert was a stack of six washer like uranium discs somewhat thicker than the projectile rings that were slid over a 1 inch 25 mm rod This rod then extended forward through the tungsten carbide tamper plug impact absorbing anvil and nose plug backstop eventually protruding out of the front of the bomb casing This entire target assembly was secured at both ends with locknuts 27 28 When the hollow front projectile reached the target and slid over the target insert the assembled super critical mass of uranium would be completely surrounded by a tamper and neutron reflector of tungsten carbide and steel both materials having a combined mass of 2 300 kg 5 100 lb 29 Neutron initiators inside the assembly were activated by the impact of the projectile into the target 30 Counter intuitive design Edit For the first fifty years after 1945 every published description and drawing of the Little Boy mechanism assumed that a small solid projectile was fired into the center of a larger stationary target 31 However critical mass considerations dictated that in Little Boy the more extensive hollow piece would be the projectile The assembled fissile core had more than two critical masses of uranium 235 This required one of the two pieces to have more than one critical mass with the larger piece avoiding criticality prior to assembly by means of shape and minimal contact with the neutron reflecting tungsten carbide tamper A hole in the center of the larger piece dispersed the mass and increased the surface area allowing more fission neutrons to escape thus preventing a premature chain reaction 32 But for this larger hollow piece to have minimal contact with the tamper it must be the projectile since only the projectile s back end was in contact with the tamper prior to detonation The rest of the tungsten carbide surrounded the sub critical mass target cylinder called the insert by the designers with air space between it and the insert This arrangement packs the maximum amount of fissile material into a gun assembly design 32 Fuze system Edit Arming plugs for a Little Boy type atomic bomb on display at the National Air and Space Museum s Steven F Udvar Hazy Center The fuzing system was designed to trigger at the most destructive altitude which calculations suggested was 580 meters 1 900 ft It employed a three stage interlock system 33 A timer ensured that the bomb would not explode until at least fifteen seconds after release one quarter of the predicted fall time to ensure the safety of the aircraft The timer was activated when the electrical pull out plugs connecting it to the airplane pulled loose as the bomb fell switching it to its internal 24 volt battery and starting the timer At the end of the 15 seconds the bomb would be 3 600 feet 1 100 m from the aircraft and the radar altimeters were powered up and responsibility was passed to the barometric stage 33 The purpose of the barometric stage was to delay activating the radar altimeter firing command circuit until near detonation altitude A thin metallic membrane enclosing a vacuum chamber a similar design is still used today in old fashioned wall barometers gradually deformed as ambient air pressure increased during descent The barometric fuze was not considered accurate enough to detonate the bomb at the precise ignition height because air pressure varies with local conditions When the bomb reached the design height for this stage reportedly 2 000 meters 6 600 ft the membrane closed a circuit activating the radar altimeters The barometric stage was added because of a worry that external radar signals might detonate the bomb too early 33 Two or more redundant radar altimeters were used to reliably detect final altitude When the altimeters sensed the correct height the firing switch closed igniting the three BuOrd Mk15 Mod 1 Navy gun primers in the breech plug which set off the charge consisting of four silk powder bags each containing 2 pounds 0 9 kg of WM slotted tube cordite This launched the uranium projectile towards the opposite end of the gun barrel at an eventual muzzle velocity of 300 meters per second 980 ft s Approximately 10 milliseconds later the chain reaction occurred lasting less than 1 microsecond The radar altimeters used were modified U S Army Air Corps APS 13 tail warning radars nicknamed Archie normally used to warn a fighter pilot of another plane approaching from behind 33 Rehearsals Edit Little Boy in the bomb pit on Tinian island before being loaded into Enola Gay s bomb bay A section of the bomb bay door is visible on the top right The Little Boy pre assemblies were designated L 1 L 2 L 3 L 4 L 5 L 6 L 7 and L 11 L 1 L 2 L 5 and L 6 were expended in test drops The first drop test was conducted with L 1 on 23 July 1945 It was dropped over the sea near Tinian in order to test the radar altimeter by the B 29 later known as Big Stink piloted by Colonel Paul W Tibbets the commander of the 509th Composite Group Two more drop tests over the sea were made on 24 and 25 July using the L 2 and L 5 units in order to test all components Tibbets was the pilot for both missions but this time the bomber used was the one subsequently known as Jabit L 6 was used as a dress rehearsal on 29 July The B 29 Next Objective piloted by Major Charles W Sweeney flew to Iwo Jima where emergency procedures for loading the bomb onto a standby aircraft were practiced This rehearsal was repeated on 31 July but this time L 6 was reloaded onto a different B 29 Enola Gay piloted by Tibbets and the bomb was test dropped near Tinian L 11 was the assembly used for the Hiroshima bomb 34 35 Bombing of Hiroshima Edit Enola Gay after Hiroshima mission entering hardstand It is in its 6th Bombardment Group livery with victor number 82 visible on fuselage just forward of the tail fin Main article Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bombing of Hiroshima Parsons the Enola Gay s weaponeer was concerned about the possibility of an accidental detonation if the plane crashed on takeoff so he decided not to load the four cordite powder bags into the gun breech until the aircraft was in flight After takeoff Parsons and his assistant Second Lieutenant Morris R Jeppson made their way into the bomb bay along the narrow catwalk on the port side Jeppson held a flashlight while Parsons disconnected the primer wires removed the breech plug inserted the powder bags replaced the breech plug and reconnected the wires Before climbing to altitude on approach to the target Jeppson switched the three safety plugs between the electrical connectors of the internal battery and the firing mechanism from green to red The bomb was then fully armed Jeppson monitored the bomb s circuits 36 The mushroom cloud over Hiroshima after the dropping of Little Boy The bomb was dropped at approximately 08 15 JST on 6 August 1945 After falling for 44 4 seconds the time and barometric triggers started the firing mechanism The detonation happened at an altitude of 1 968 50 feet 600 15 m It was less powerful than the Fat Man which was dropped on Nagasaki but the damage and the number of victims at Hiroshima were much higher as Hiroshima was on flat terrain while the hypocenter of Nagasaki lay in a small valley According to figures published in 1945 66 000 people were killed as a direct result of the Hiroshima blast and 69 000 were injured to varying degrees 37 Later estimates put the deaths as high as 140 000 people 38 The United States Strategic Bombing Survey estimated that out of 24 158 Imperial Japanese Army soldiers in Hiroshima at the time of the bombing 6 789 were killed or missing as a result of the bombing 39 The exact measurement of the explosive yield of the bomb was problematic since the weapon had never been tested President Harry S Truman officially announced that the yield was 20 kilotons of TNT 84 TJ This was based on Parsons s visual assessment that the blast was greater than what he had seen at the Trinity nuclear test Since that had been estimated at 18 kilotons of TNT 75 TJ speech writers rounded up to 20 kilotons Further discussion was then suppressed for fear of lessening the impact of the bomb on the Japanese Data had been collected by Luis Alvarez Harold Agnew and Lawrence H Johnston on the instrument plane The Great Artiste but this was not used to calculate the yield at the time 40 After hostilities ended a survey team from the Manhattan Project that included William Penney Robert Serber and George T Reynolds was sent to Hiroshima to evaluate the effects of the blast From evaluating the effects on objects and structures Penney concluded that the yield was 12 1 kilotons 41 Later calculations based on charring pointed to a yield of 13 to 14 kilotons 42 In 1953 Frederick Reines calculated the yield as 15 kilotons of TNT 63 TJ 40 This figure became the official yield 43 Project Ichiban Edit In 1962 scientists at Los Alamos created a mockup of Little Boy known as Project Ichiban in order to answer some of the unanswered questions about the exact radiation output of the bomb which would be useful for setting benchmarks for interpreting the relationship between radiation exposure and later health outcomes But it failed to clear up all the issues In 1982 Los Alamos created a replica Little Boy from the original drawings and specifications This was then tested with enriched uranium but in a safe configuration that would not cause a nuclear explosion A hydraulic lift was used to move the projectile and experiments were run to assess neutron emission 44 Based on this and the data from The Great Artiste the yield was estimated at 16 6 0 3 kilotons 45 After considering many estimation methods a 1985 report concluded that the yield was 15 kilotons of TNT 63 TJ 20 43 Physical effects Edit source source source source source source The General Effects of the Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki a US Air Force film After being selected in April 1945 Hiroshima was spared conventional bombing to serve as a pristine target where the effects of a nuclear bomb on an undamaged city could be observed 46 While damage could be studied later the energy yield of the untested Little Boy design could be determined only at the moment of detonation using instruments dropped by parachute from a plane flying in formation with the one that dropped the bomb Radio transmitted data from these instruments indicated a yield of about 15 kilotons 43 Comparing this yield to the observed damage produced a rule of thumb called the 5 pounds per square inch 34 kPa lethal area rule Approximately all the people inside the area where the shock wave carried such an overpressure or greater would be killed 47 At Hiroshima that area was 3 5 kilometres 2 2 mi in diameter 48 The damage came from three main effects blast fire and radiation 49 Blast Edit The blast from a nuclear bomb is the result of X ray heated air the fireball sending a shock wave or pressure wave in all directions initially at a velocity greater than the speed of sound 50 analogous to thunder generated by lightning Knowledge about urban blast destruction is based largely on studies of Little Boy at Hiroshima Nagasaki buildings suffered similar damage at similar distances but the Nagasaki bomb detonated 3 2 kilometres 2 0 mi from the city center over hilly terrain that was partially bare of buildings 51 Frame house in 1953 nuclear test 5 psi overpressure In Hiroshima almost everything within 1 6 kilometres 1 0 mi of the point directly under the explosion was completely destroyed except for about 50 heavily reinforced earthquake resistant concrete buildings only the shells of which remained standing Most were completely gutted with their windows doors sashes and frames ripped out 52 The perimeter of severe blast damage approximately followed the 5 psi 34 kPa contour at 1 8 kilometres 1 1 mi Later test explosions of nuclear weapons with houses and other test structures nearby confirmed the 5 psi overpressure threshold Ordinary urban buildings experiencing it were crushed toppled or gutted by the force of air pressure The picture at right shows the effects of a nuclear bomb generated 5 psi pressure wave on a test structure in Nevada in 1953 53 A major effect of this kind of structural damage was that it created fuel for fires that were started simultaneously throughout the severe destruction region Fire Edit The first effect of the explosion was blinding light accompanied by radiant heat from the fireball The Hiroshima fireball was 370 metres 1 200 ft in diameter with a surface temperature of 6 000 C 10 830 F about the same temperature as at the surface of the sun 54 Near ground zero everything flammable burst into flame One famous anonymous Hiroshima victim sitting on stone steps 260 metres 850 ft from the hypocenter left only a shadow having absorbed the fireball heat that permanently bleached the surrounding stone 55 Simultaneous fires were started throughout the blast damaged area by fireball heat and by overturned stoves and furnaces electrical shorts etc Twenty minutes after the detonation these fires had merged into a firestorm pulling in surface air from all directions to feed an inferno which consumed everything flammable 56 Hiroshima blast and fire damage U S Strategic Bombing Survey map The Hiroshima firestorm was roughly 3 2 kilometres 2 0 mi in diameter corresponding closely to the severe blast damage zone See the USSBS 57 map right Blast damaged buildings provided fuel for the fire Structural lumber and furniture were splintered and scattered about Debris choked roads obstructed firefighters Broken gas pipes fueled the fire and broken water pipes rendered hydrants useless 56 At Nagasaki the fires failed to merge into a single firestorm and the fire damaged area was only one fourth as great as at Hiroshima due in part to a southwest wind that pushed the fires away from the city 58 As the map shows the Hiroshima firestorm jumped natural firebreaks river channels as well as prepared firebreaks The spread of fire stopped only when it reached the edge of the blast damaged area encountering less available fuel 59 The Manhattan Project report on Hiroshima estimated that 60 of immediate deaths were caused by fire but with the caveat that many persons near the center of explosion suffered fatal injuries from more than one of the bomb effects 60 Radiation Edit Local fallout is dust and ash from a bomb crater contaminated with radioactive fission products It falls to earth downwind of the crater and can produce with radiation alone a lethal area much larger than that from blast and fire With an air burst the fission products rise into the stratosphere where they dissipate and become part of the global environment Because Little Boy was an air burst 580 metres 1 900 ft above the ground there was no bomb crater and no local radioactive fallout 61 However a burst of intense neutron and gamma radiation came directly from the fission of the uranium Its lethal radius was approximately 1 3 kilometres 0 8 mi 62 63 covering about half of the firestorm area An estimated 30 of immediate fatalities were people who received lethal doses of this direct radiation but died in the firestorm before their radiation injuries would have become apparent Over 6 000 people survived the blast and fire but died of radiation injuries 60 Among injured survivors 30 had radiation injuries 64 from which they recovered but with a lifelong increase in cancer risk 65 66 To date no radiation related evidence of heritable diseases has been observed among the survivors children 67 68 69 Conventional weapon equivalent Edit See also Operation Meetinghouse Although Little Boy exploded with the energy equivalent of 16 000 tons of TNT the Strategic Bombing Survey estimated that the same blast and fire effect could have been caused by 2 100 tons of conventional bombs 220 B 29s carrying 1 200 tons of incendiary bombs 400 tons of high explosive bombs and 500 tons of anti personnel fragmentation bombs 70 Since the target was spread across a two dimensional plane the vertical component of a single spherical nuclear explosion was largely wasted A cluster bomb pattern of smaller explosions would have been a more energy efficient match to the target 70 Post war Edit One of five casings built for the Little Boy bomb used on Hiroshima on display at the Imperial War Museum in London during 2015 When the war ended it was not expected that the inefficient Little Boy design would ever again be required and many plans and diagrams were destroyed However by mid 1946 the Hanford Site reactors were suffering badly from the Wigner effect Faced with the prospect of no more plutonium for new cores and no more polonium for the initiators for the cores that had already been produced the Director of the Manhattan Project Major General Leslie R Groves ordered that some Little Boys be prepared as an interim measure until a solution could be found No Little Boy assemblies were available and no comprehensive set of diagrams of the Little Boy could be found although there were drawings of the various components and stocks of spare parts 71 72 At Sandia Base three Army officers Captains Albert Bethel Richard Meyer and Bobbie Griffin attempted to re create the Little Boy They were supervised by Harlow W Russ an expert on Little Boy who served with Project Alberta on Tinian and was now leader of the Z 11 Group of the Los Alamos Laboratory s Z Division at Sandia Gradually they managed to locate the correct drawings and parts and figured out how they went together Eventually they built six Little Boy assemblies Although the casings barrels and components were tested no enriched uranium was supplied for the bombs By early 1947 the problem caused by the Wigner effect was on its way to solution and the three officers were reassigned 71 72 The Navy Bureau of Ordnance built 25 Little Boy assemblies in 1947 for use by the nuclear capable Lockheed P2V Neptune aircraft carrier aircraft which could be launched from but not land on the Midway class aircraft carriers Components were produced by the Naval Ordnance Plants in Pocatello Idaho and Louisville Kentucky Enough fissionable material was available by 1948 to build ten projectiles and targets although there were only enough initiators for six 73 All the Little Boy units were withdrawn from service by the end of January 1951 74 75 The Smithsonian Institution displayed a Little Boy complete except for enriched uranium until 1986 The Department of Energy took the weapon from the museum to remove its inner components so the bombs could not be stolen and detonated with fissile material The government returned the emptied casing to the Smithsonian in 1993 Three other disarmed bombs are on display in the United States another is at the Imperial War Museum in London 31 Notes Edit Serber amp Crease 1998 p 104 Hansen 1995 p V 105 Jones 1985 p 9 Jones 1985 p 138 Jones 1985 p 143 Jones 1985 pp 64 65 Groves 1962 p 34 Rhodes 1986 p 427 Rhodes 1995 pp 160 161 The Sensational Surrender of Four Nazi U boats at the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard New England Historical Society 15 May 2015 Retrieved 19 September 2018 Hoddeson et al 1993 p 228 Hoddeson et al 1993 pp 245 249 Rhodes 1986 p 541 Hoddeson et al 1993 p 257 Hoddeson et al 1993 p 262 Nichols 1987 pp 175 176 a b c Hoddeson et al 1993 p 265 Coster Mullen 2012 p 30 Hansen 1995 pp 111 112 Hoddeson et al 1993 p 293 a b Hansen 1995 p 113 Hoddeson et al 1993 p 333 Gosling 1999 p 51 a b Coster Mullen 2012 p 18 Coster Mullen 2012 p 27 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p 12 Sublette Carey Nuclear Weapons Frequently Asked Questions Section 8 0 The First Nuclear Weapons Retrieved 29 August 2013 Coster Mullen 2012 pp 18 19 27 Bernstein 2007 p 133 Hoddeson et al 1993 pp 263 265 a b Samuels 2008 a b Coster Mullen 2012 pp 23 24 a b c d Hansen 1995a pp 2 5 Campbell 2005 pp 46 80 Coster Mullen 2012 pp 100 101 Coster Mullen 2012 pp 34 35 The Manhattan Engineer District 29 June 1946 The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Project Gutenberg Public Domain p 3 Alex Wellerstein 4 August 2020 Counting the Dead at Hiroshima and Nagasaki Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists W F Craven and J L Cate eds 1983 The Army Air Forces in World War II Volume 5 The Pacific MATTERHORN to Nagasaki June 1944 to August 1945 Office of Air Force History p 723 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint uses authors parameter link a b Hoddeson et al 1993 p 393 Malik 1985 pp 18 20 Malik 1985 p 21 a b c Malik 1985 p 1 Coster Mullen 2012 pp 86 87 Malik 1985 p 16 Groves 1962 p 267 To enable us to assess accurately the effects of the nuclear bomb the targets should not have been previously damaged by air raids Four cities were chosen including Hiroshima and Kyoto War Secretary Stimson vetoed Kyoto and Nagasaki was substituted p 275 When our target cities were first selected an order was sent to the Army Air Force in Guam not to bomb them without special authority from the War Department Glasstone 1962 p 629 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p 1 Diacon 1984 p 18 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 pp 300 301 The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1946 p 14 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p 179 Nuclear Weapon Thermal Effects 1998 Human Shadow Etched in Stone a b Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 pp 300 304 D Olier 1946 pp 22 25 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p 304 The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1946 pp 21 23 a b The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki 1946 p 21 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 p 409 An air burst by definition is one taking place at such a height above the earth that no appreciable quantities of surface material are taken up into the fireball the deposition of early fallout from an air burst will generally not be significant An air burst however may produce some induced radioactive contamination in the general vicinity of ground zero as a result of neutron capture by elements in the soil p 36 at Hiroshima injuries due to fallout were completely absent Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 pp Chapter VIII and the Nuclear Bomb Effects Computer Wellerstein Alex NUKEMAP nuclearsecrecy com Alex Wellerstein Retrieved 28 July 2021 Glasstone amp Dolan 1977 pp 545 546 Richardson RR 2009 The ongoing research into the effects of radiation Radio Netherlands Archives 31 July 2005 Retrieved 16 December 2018 Genetic Effects Izumi BJC 2003 Izumi IJC 2003 a b D Olier 1946 p 24 a b Coster Mullen 2012 p 85 a b Abrahamson amp Carew 2002 pp 41 42 Hansen 1995 pp 116 118 Hansen 1995 p 3 Chart of Strategic Nuclear Bombs strategic air command com References EditAbrahamson James L Carew Paul H 2002 Vanguard of American Atomic Deterrence Westport Connecticut Praeger ISBN 0 275 97819 2 OCLC 49859889 The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki PDF The Manhattan Engineer District 29 June 1946 Archived from the original PDF on 6 April 2012 Retrieved 6 November 2013 This report can also be found here and here Bernstein Jeremy 2007 Nuclear Weapons What You Need to Know Cambridge University Press ISBN 978 0 521 88408 2 Campbell Richard H 2005 The Silverplate Bombers A History and Registry of the Enola Gay and Other B 29s Configured to Carry Atomic Bombs Jefferson North Carolina McFarland amp Company ISBN 0 7864 2139 8 OCLC 58554961 Coster Mullen John 2012 Atom Bombs The Top Secret Inside Story of Little Boy and Fat Man Waukesha Wisconsin J Coster Mullen OCLC 298514167 Diacon Diane 1984 Residential Housing and Nuclear Attack London Croom Helm ISBN 978 0 7099 0868 5 D Olier Franklin ed 1946 United States Strategic Bombing Survey Summary Report Pacific War Washington United States Government Printing Office Retrieved 6 November 2013 This report can also be found here Genetic Effects Question 7 Radiation Effects Research Foundation Retrieved 6 November 2013 Glasstone Samuel 1962 The Effects of Nuclear Weapons Revised Edition United States United States Department of Defense and United States Atomic Energy Commission ISBN 978 1258793555 Glasstone Samuel Dolan Philip J 1977 The Effects of Nuclear Weapons Third Edition United States United States Department of Defense and United States Department of Energy ISBN 978 1603220163 Gosling F G 1999 The Manhattan Project Making the Atomic Bomb Diane Publishing ISBN 978 0 7881 7880 1 Groves Leslie R 1962 Now it Can Be Told the Story of the Manhattan Project New York Da Capo Press 1975 reprint ISBN 0 306 70738 1 Hansen Chuck 1995 Volume V US Nuclear Weapons Histories Swords of Armageddon US Nuclear Weapons Development since 1945 Sunnyvale California Chuckelea Publications ISBN 978 0 9791915 0 3 OCLC 231585284 Hansen Chuck 1995a Volume VII The Development of US Nuclear Weapons Swords of Armageddon US Nuclear Weapons Development since 1945 Sunnyvale California Chuckelea Publications ISBN 978 0 9791915 7 2 OCLC 231585284 Hoddeson Lillian Henriksen Paul W Meade Roger A Westfall Catherine L 1993 Critical Assembly A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years 1943 1945 New York Cambridge University Press ISBN 0 521 44132 3 OCLC 26764320 Human Shadow Etched in Stone Photographic Display Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum Retrieved 6 November 2013 Izumi S Koyama K Soda M Suyama A November 2003 Cancer incidence in children and young adults did not increase relative to parental exposure to atomic bombs British Journal of Cancer 89 9 1709 1713 doi 10 1038 sj bjc 6601322 PMC 2394417 PMID 14583774 Izumi S Suyama A Koyama K November 2003 Radiation related mortality among offspring of atomic bomb survivors a half century of follow up International Journal of Cancer 107 2 292 297 doi 10 1002 ijc 11400 PMID 12949810 S2CID 23902907 Jones Vincent 1985 Manhattan The Army and the Atomic Bomb PDF Washington D C United States Army Center of Military History OCLC 10913875 Archived from the original PDF on 7 October 2014 Retrieved 25 August 2013 Malik John S 1985 The yields of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear explosions PDF Los Alamos National Laboratory report number LA 8819 Retrieved 6 November 2013 Nichols Kenneth 1987 The Road to Trinity A Personal Account of How America s Nuclear Policies Were Made New York William Morrow ISBN 068806910X OCLC 15223648 Nuclear Weapon Thermal Effects Special Weapons Primer Weapons of Mass Destruction Federation of American Scientists 1998 Archived from the original on 22 April 2013 Retrieved 5 November 2013 Rhodes Richard 1986 The Making of the Atomic Bomb New York Simon amp Schuster ISBN 0 684 81378 5 OCLC 13793436 Rhodes Richard 1995 Dark Sun The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb New York Touchstone ISBN 0 684 82414 0 Richardson David et al September 2009 Ionizing Radiation and Leukemia Mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors 1950 2000 Radiation Research 172 3 368 382 Bibcode 2009RadR 172 368R doi 10 1667 RR1801 1 PMID 19708786 S2CID 12463437 Samuels David 15 December 2008 Atomic John A truck driver uncovers secrets about the first nuclear bombs The New Yorker Retrieved 30 August 2013 Serber Robert Crease Robert P 1998 Peace amp War Reminiscences of a Life on the Frontiers of Science New York Columbia University Press ISBN 978 0231105460 OCLC 37631186 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to Little Boy Little Boy description at Carey Sublette s NuclearWeaponArchive org Nuclear Files org Definition and explanation of Little Boy The Nuclear Weapon Archive Simulation of Little Boy an interactive simulation of Little Boy Little Boy 3D Model Hiroshima amp Nagasaki Remembered information about preparation and dropping the Little Boy bomb Little boy Nuclear Bomb at Imperial War museum London UK jpg Portals Nuclear technology History of science World War II Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Little Boy amp oldid 1141450465, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.