fbpx
Wikipedia

Flory–Huggins solution theory

Flory–Huggins solution theory is a lattice model of the thermodynamics of polymer solutions which takes account of the great dissimilarity in molecular sizes in adapting the usual expression for the entropy of mixing. The result is an equation for the Gibbs free energy change for mixing a polymer with a solvent. Although it makes simplifying assumptions, it generates useful results for interpreting experiments.

Mixture of polymers and solvent on a lattice

Theory edit

The thermodynamic equation for the Gibbs energy change accompanying mixing at constant temperature and (external) pressure is

 

A change, denoted by  , is the value of a variable for a solution or mixture minus the values for the pure components considered separately. The objective is to find explicit formulas for   and  , the enthalpy and entropy increments associated with the mixing process.

The result obtained by Flory[1] and Huggins[2] is

 

The right-hand side is a function of the number of moles   and volume fraction   of solvent (component  ), the number of moles   and volume fraction   of polymer (component  ), with the introduction of a parameter   to take account of the energy of interdispersing polymer and solvent molecules.   is the gas constant and   is the absolute temperature. The volume fraction is analogous to the mole fraction, but is weighted to take account of the relative sizes of the molecules. For a small solute, the mole fractions would appear instead, and this modification is the innovation due to Flory and Huggins. In the most general case the mixing parameter,  , is a free energy parameter, thus including an entropic component.[1][2]

Derivation edit

We first calculate the entropy of mixing, the increase in the uncertainty about the locations of the molecules when they are interspersed. In the pure condensed phasessolvent and polymer — everywhere we look we find a molecule.[3] Of course, any notion of "finding" a molecule in a given location is a thought experiment since we can't actually examine spatial locations the size of molecules. The expression for the entropy of mixing of small molecules in terms of mole fractions is no longer reasonable when the solute is a macromolecular chain. We take account of this dissymmetry in molecular sizes by assuming that individual polymer segments and individual solvent molecules occupy sites on a lattice. Each site is occupied by exactly one molecule of the solvent or by one monomer of the polymer chain, so the total number of sites is

 

  is the number of solvent molecules and   is the number of polymer molecules, each of which has   segments.[4]

For a random walk on a lattice[3] we can calculate the entropy change (the increase in spatial uncertainty) as a result of mixing solute and solvent.

 

where   is Boltzmann's constant. Define the lattice volume fractions   and  

 

These are also the probabilities that a given lattice site, chosen at random, is occupied by a solvent molecule or a polymer segment, respectively. Thus

 

For a small solute whose molecules occupy just one lattice site,   equals one, the volume fractions reduce to molecular or mole fractions, and we recover the usual entropy of mixing.

In addition to the entropic effect, we can expect an enthalpy change.[5] There are three molecular interactions to consider: solvent-solvent  , monomer-monomer   (not the covalent bonding, but between different chain sections), and monomer-solvent  . Each of the last occurs at the expense of the average of the other two, so the energy increment per monomer-solvent contact is

 

The total number of such contacts is

 

where   is the coordination number, the number of nearest neighbors for a lattice site, each one occupied either by one chain segment or a solvent molecule. That is,   is the total number of polymer segments (monomers) in the solution, so   is the number of nearest-neighbor sites to all the polymer segments. Multiplying by the probability   that any such site is occupied by a solvent molecule,[6] we obtain the total number of polymer-solvent molecular interactions. An approximation following mean field theory is made by following this procedure, thereby reducing the complex problem of many interactions to a simpler problem of one interaction.

The enthalpy change is equal to the energy change per polymer monomer-solvent interaction multiplied by the number of such interactions

 

The polymer-solvent interaction parameter chi is defined as

 

It depends on the nature of both the solvent and the solute, and is the only material-specific parameter in the model. The enthalpy change becomes

 

Assembling terms, the total free energy change is

 

where we have converted the expression from molecules   and   to moles   and   by transferring the Avogadro constant   to the gas constant  .

The value of the interaction parameter can be estimated from the Hildebrand solubility parameters   and  

 

where   is the actual volume of a polymer segment.

In the most general case the interaction   and the ensuing mixing parameter,  , is a free energy parameter, thus including an entropic component.[1][2] This means that aside to the regular mixing entropy there is another entropic contribution from the interaction between solvent and monomer. This contribution is sometimes very important in order to make quantitative predictions of thermodynamic properties.

More advanced solution theories exist, such as the Flory–Krigbaum theory.

Liquid-liquid phase separation edit

 
Osmotic pressure for a polymer solution in two regimes of interaction parameter  
 
Schematic of the binodal and spinodal curves for a semi-dilute polymer solution. The light blue region indicates a metastable solution where phase separation occurs and the white region corresponds to well-mixed states. The dark blue unstable region corresponds to states where spinodal decomposition occurs.

Polymers can separate out from the solvent, and do so in a characteristic way.[4] The Flory-Huggins free energy per unit volume, for a polymer with   monomers, can be written in a simple dimensionless form

 

for   the volume fraction of monomers, and  . The osmotic pressure (in reduced units) is  .

The polymer solution is stable with respect to small fluctuations when the second derivative of this free energy is positive. This second derivative is

 

and the solution first becomes unstable when this and the third derivative  are both equal to zero. A little algebra then shows that the polymer solution first becomes unstable at a critical point at

 

This means that for all values of   the monomer-solvent effective interaction is weakly repulsive, but this is too weak to cause liquid/liquid separation. However, when  , there is separation into two coexisting phases, one richer in polymer but poorer in solvent, than the other.

The unusual feature of the liquid/liquid phase separation is that it is highly asymmetric: the volume fraction of monomers at the critical point is approximately  , which is very small for large polymers. The amount of polymer in the solvent-rich/polymer-poor coexisting phase is extremely small for long polymers. The solvent-rich phase is close to pure solvent. This is peculiar to polymers, a mixture of small molecules can be approximated using the Flory-Huggins expression with  , and then   and both coexisting phases are far from pure.

Polymer blends edit

Synthetic polymers rarely consist of chains of uniform length in solvent. The Flory-Huggins free energy density can be generalized[5] to an N-component mixture of polymers with lengths   by

 

For a binary polymer blend, where one species consists of   monomers and the other   monomers this simplifies to

 

As in the case for dilute polymer solutions, the first two terms on the right-hand side represent the entropy of mixing. For large polymers of   and   these terms are negligibly small. This implies that for a stable mixture to exist  , so for polymers A and B to blend their segments must attract one another.[6]

Limitations edit

Flory-Huggins theory tends to agree well with experiments in the semi-dilute concentration regime and can be used to fit data for even more complicated blends with higher concentrations. The theory qualitatively predicts phase separation, the tendency for high molecular weight species to be immiscible, the   interaction-temperature dependence and other features commonly observed in polymer mixtures. However, unmodified Flory-Huggins theory fails to predict the lower critical solution temperature observed in some polymer blends and the lack of dependence of the critical temperature   on chain length  .[7] Additionally, it can be shown that for a binary blend of polymer species with equal chain lengths   the critical concentration should be  ; however, polymers blends have been observed where this parameter is highly asymmetric. In certain blends, mixing entropy can dominate over monomer interaction. By adopting the mean-field approximation,   parameter complex dependence on temperature, blend composition, and chain length was discarded. Specifically, interactions beyond the nearest neighbor may be highly relevant to the behavior of the blend and the distribution of polymer segments is not necessarily uniform, so certain lattice sites may experience interaction energies disparate from that approximated by the mean-field theory.

One well-studied[4][6] effect on interaction energies neglected by unmodified Flory Huggins theory is chain correlation. In dilute polymer mixtures, where chains are well separated, intramolecular forces between monomers of the polymer chain dominate and drive demixing leading to regions where polymer concentration is high. As the polymer concentration increases, chains tend to overlap and the effect becomes less important. In fact, the demarcation between dilute and semi-dilute solutions is commonly defined by the concentration where polymers begin to overlap   which can be estimated as

 

Here, m is the mass of a single polymer chain, and   is the chain's radius of gyration.

References edit

  1. ^ a b Burchard, W (1983). "Solution Thermodyanmics of Non-Ionic Water Soluble Polymers.". In Finch, C. (ed.). Chemistry and Technology of Water-Soluble Polymers. Springer. pp. 125–142. ISBN 978-1-4757-9661-2.
  2. ^ a b Franks, F (1983). "Water Solubility and Sensitivity-Hydration Effects.". In Finch, C. (ed.). Chemistry and Technology of Water-Soluble Polymers. Springer. pp. 157–178. ISBN 978-1-4757-9661-2.
  3. ^ Dijk, Menno A. van; Wakker, Andre (1998-01-14). Concepts in Polymer Thermodynamics. CRC Press. pp. 61–65. ISBN 978-1-56676-623-4.
  4. ^ a b de Gennes, Pierre-Gilles (1979). Scaling concepts in polymer physics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. ISBN 080141203X. OCLC 4494721.
  5. ^ Berry, J; et al. (2018). "Physical principles of intracellular organization via active and passive phase transitions". Reports on Progress in Physics. 81 (46601): 046601. Bibcode:2018RPPh...81d6601B. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaa61e. PMID 29313527. S2CID 4039711.
  6. ^ a b Doi, Masao (2013). Soft Matter Physics. Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199652952.
  7. ^ Schmid, Friederike (2010). "Theory and Simulation of Multiphase Polymer Systems". arXiv:1001.1265 [cond-mat.soft].

External links edit

  • "Conformations, Solutions and Molecular Weight" (book chapter), Chapter 3 of Book Title: Polymer Science and Technology; by Joel R. Fried; 2nd Edition, 2003

Footnotes edit

  1. ^ "Thermodynamics of High Polymer Solutions," Paul J. Flory Journal of Chemical Physics, August 1941, Volume 9, Issue 8, p. 660 Abstract. Flory suggested that Huggins' name ought to be first since he had published several months earlier: Flory, P.J., "Thermodynamics of high polymer solutions," J. Chem. Phys. 10:51-61 (1942) Citation Classic No. 18, May 6, 1985
  2. ^ "Solutions of Long Chain Compounds," Maurice L. Huggins Journal of Chemical Physics, May 1941 Volume 9, Issue 5, p. 440 Abstract
  3. ^ We are ignoring the free volume due to molecular disorder in liquids and amorphous solids as compared to crystals. This, and the assumption that monomers and solute molecules are really the same size, are the main geometric approximations in this model.
  4. ^ For a real synthetic polymer, there is a statistical distribution of chain lengths, so   would be an average.
  5. ^ The enthalpy is the internal energy corrected for any pressure-volume work at constant (external)  . We are not making any distinction here. This allows the approximation of Helmholtz free energy, which is the natural form of free energy from the Flory–Huggins lattice theory, to Gibbs free energy.
  6. ^ In fact, two of the sites adjacent to a polymer segment are occupied by other polymer segments since it is part of a chain; and one more, making three, for branching sites, but only one for terminals.

flory, huggins, solution, theory, lattice, model, thermodynamics, polymer, solutions, which, takes, account, great, dissimilarity, molecular, sizes, adapting, usual, expression, entropy, mixing, result, equation, gibbs, free, energy, change, displaystyle, delt. Flory Huggins solution theory is a lattice model of the thermodynamics of polymer solutions which takes account of the great dissimilarity in molecular sizes in adapting the usual expression for the entropy of mixing The result is an equation for the Gibbs free energy change D G m i x displaystyle Delta G rm mix for mixing a polymer with a solvent Although it makes simplifying assumptions it generates useful results for interpreting experiments Mixture of polymers and solvent on a lattice Contents 1 Theory 2 Derivation 3 Liquid liquid phase separation 4 Polymer blends 5 Limitations 6 References 7 External links 8 FootnotesTheory editThe thermodynamic equation for the Gibbs energy change accompanying mixing at constant temperature and external pressure is D G m i x D H m i x T D S m i x displaystyle Delta G rm mix Delta H rm mix T Delta S rm mix nbsp A change denoted by D displaystyle Delta nbsp is the value of a variable for a solution or mixture minus the values for the pure components considered separately The objective is to find explicit formulas for D H m i x displaystyle Delta H rm mix nbsp and D S m i x displaystyle Delta S rm mix nbsp the enthalpy and entropy increments associated with the mixing process The result obtained by Flory 1 and Huggins 2 is D G m i x R T n 1 ln ϕ 1 n 2 ln ϕ 2 n 1 ϕ 2 x 12 displaystyle Delta G rm mix RT n 1 ln phi 1 n 2 ln phi 2 n 1 phi 2 chi 12 nbsp The right hand side is a function of the number of moles n 1 displaystyle n 1 nbsp and volume fraction ϕ 1 displaystyle phi 1 nbsp of solvent component 1 displaystyle 1 nbsp the number of moles n 2 displaystyle n 2 nbsp and volume fraction ϕ 2 displaystyle phi 2 nbsp of polymer component 2 displaystyle 2 nbsp with the introduction of a parameter x displaystyle chi nbsp to take account of the energy of interdispersing polymer and solvent molecules R displaystyle R nbsp is the gas constant and T displaystyle T nbsp is the absolute temperature The volume fraction is analogous to the mole fraction but is weighted to take account of the relative sizes of the molecules For a small solute the mole fractions would appear instead and this modification is the innovation due to Flory and Huggins In the most general case the mixing parameter x displaystyle chi nbsp is a free energy parameter thus including an entropic component 1 2 Derivation editWe first calculate the entropy of mixing the increase in the uncertainty about the locations of the molecules when they are interspersed In the pure condensed phases solvent and polymer everywhere we look we find a molecule 3 Of course any notion of finding a molecule in a given location is a thought experiment since we can t actually examine spatial locations the size of molecules The expression for the entropy of mixing of small molecules in terms of mole fractions is no longer reasonable when the solute is a macromolecular chain We take account of this dissymmetry in molecular sizes by assuming that individual polymer segments and individual solvent molecules occupy sites on a lattice Each site is occupied by exactly one molecule of the solvent or by one monomer of the polymer chain so the total number of sites is N N 1 x N 2 displaystyle N N 1 xN 2 nbsp N 1 displaystyle N 1 nbsp is the number of solvent molecules and N 2 displaystyle N 2 nbsp is the number of polymer molecules each of which has x displaystyle x nbsp segments 4 For a random walk on a lattice 3 we can calculate the entropy change the increase in spatial uncertainty as a result of mixing solute and solvent D S m i x k B N 1 ln N 1 N N 2 ln x N 2 N displaystyle Delta S rm mix k rm B left N 1 ln tfrac N 1 N N 2 ln tfrac xN 2 N right nbsp where k B displaystyle k rm B nbsp is Boltzmann s constant Define the lattice volume fractions ϕ 1 displaystyle phi 1 nbsp and ϕ 2 displaystyle phi 2 nbsp ϕ 1 N 1 N ϕ 2 x N 2 N displaystyle phi 1 frac N 1 N quad phi 2 frac xN 2 N nbsp These are also the probabilities that a given lattice site chosen at random is occupied by a solvent molecule or a polymer segment respectively Thus D S m i x k B N 1 ln ϕ 1 N 2 ln ϕ 2 displaystyle Delta S rm mix k rm B N 1 ln phi 1 N 2 ln phi 2 nbsp For a small solute whose molecules occupy just one lattice site x displaystyle x nbsp equals one the volume fractions reduce to molecular or mole fractions and we recover the usual entropy of mixing In addition to the entropic effect we can expect an enthalpy change 5 There are three molecular interactions to consider solvent solvent w 11 displaystyle w 11 nbsp monomer monomer w 22 displaystyle w 22 nbsp not the covalent bonding but between different chain sections and monomer solvent w 12 displaystyle w 12 nbsp Each of the last occurs at the expense of the average of the other two so the energy increment per monomer solvent contact is D w w 12 1 2 w 22 w 11 displaystyle Delta w w 12 tfrac 1 2 w 22 w 11 nbsp The total number of such contacts is x N 2 z ϕ 1 N 1 ϕ 2 z displaystyle xN 2 z phi 1 N 1 phi 2 z nbsp where z displaystyle z nbsp is the coordination number the number of nearest neighbors for a lattice site each one occupied either by one chain segment or a solvent molecule That is x N 2 displaystyle xN 2 nbsp is the total number of polymer segments monomers in the solution so x N 2 z displaystyle xN 2 z nbsp is the number of nearest neighbor sites to all the polymer segments Multiplying by the probability ϕ 1 displaystyle phi 1 nbsp that any such site is occupied by a solvent molecule 6 we obtain the total number of polymer solvent molecular interactions An approximation following mean field theory is made by following this procedure thereby reducing the complex problem of many interactions to a simpler problem of one interaction The enthalpy change is equal to the energy change per polymer monomer solvent interaction multiplied by the number of such interactions D H m i x N 1 ϕ 2 z D w displaystyle Delta H rm mix N 1 phi 2 z Delta w nbsp The polymer solvent interaction parameter chi is defined as x 12 z D w k B T displaystyle chi 12 frac z Delta w k rm B T nbsp It depends on the nature of both the solvent and the solute and is the only material specific parameter in the model The enthalpy change becomes D H m i x k B T N 1 ϕ 2 x 12 displaystyle Delta H rm mix k rm B TN 1 phi 2 chi 12 nbsp Assembling terms the total free energy change is D G m i x R T n 1 ln ϕ 1 n 2 ln ϕ 2 n 1 ϕ 2 x 12 displaystyle Delta G rm mix RT n 1 ln phi 1 n 2 ln phi 2 n 1 phi 2 chi 12 nbsp where we have converted the expression from molecules N 1 displaystyle N 1 nbsp and N 2 displaystyle N 2 nbsp to moles n 1 displaystyle n 1 nbsp and n 2 displaystyle n 2 nbsp by transferring the Avogadro constant N A displaystyle N A nbsp to the gas constant R k B N A displaystyle R k rm B N A nbsp The value of the interaction parameter can be estimated from the Hildebrand solubility parameters d a displaystyle delta a nbsp and d b displaystyle delta b nbsp x 12 V s e g d a d b 2 R T displaystyle chi 12 frac V rm seg delta a delta b 2 RT nbsp where V s e g displaystyle V rm seg nbsp is the actual volume of a polymer segment In the most general case the interaction D w displaystyle Delta w nbsp and the ensuing mixing parameter x displaystyle chi nbsp is a free energy parameter thus including an entropic component 1 2 This means that aside to the regular mixing entropy there is another entropic contribution from the interaction between solvent and monomer This contribution is sometimes very important in order to make quantitative predictions of thermodynamic properties More advanced solution theories exist such as the Flory Krigbaum theory Liquid liquid phase separation edit nbsp Osmotic pressure for a polymer solution in two regimes of interaction parameter x displaystyle chi nbsp nbsp Schematic of the binodal and spinodal curves for a semi dilute polymer solution The light blue region indicates a metastable solution where phase separation occurs and the white region corresponds to well mixed states The dark blue unstable region corresponds to states where spinodal decomposition occurs Polymers can separate out from the solvent and do so in a characteristic way 4 The Flory Huggins free energy per unit volume for a polymer with N displaystyle N nbsp monomers can be written in a simple dimensionless form f ϕ N ln ϕ 1 ϕ ln 1 ϕ x ϕ 1 ϕ displaystyle f frac phi N ln phi 1 phi ln 1 phi chi phi 1 phi nbsp for ϕ displaystyle phi nbsp the volume fraction of monomers and N 1 displaystyle N gg 1 nbsp The osmotic pressure in reduced units is P ϕ N ln 1 ϕ ϕ x ϕ 2 displaystyle Pi tfrac phi N ln 1 phi phi chi phi 2 nbsp The polymer solution is stable with respect to small fluctuations when the second derivative of this free energy is positive This second derivative is f 1 N ϕ 1 1 ϕ 2 x displaystyle f frac 1 N phi frac 1 1 phi 2 chi nbsp and the solution first becomes unstable when this and the third derivative f 1 N ϕ 2 1 1 ϕ 2 displaystyle f tfrac 1 N phi 2 tfrac 1 1 phi 2 nbsp are both equal to zero A little algebra then shows that the polymer solution first becomes unstable at a critical point at x C P 1 2 N 1 2 ϕ C P N 1 2 N 1 displaystyle chi CP simeq 1 2 N 1 2 cdots phi CP simeq N 1 2 N 1 cdots nbsp This means that for all values of 0 lt x 1 2 displaystyle 0 lt chi lesssim 1 2 nbsp the monomer solvent effective interaction is weakly repulsive but this is too weak to cause liquid liquid separation However when x gt 1 2 displaystyle chi gt 1 2 nbsp there is separation into two coexisting phases one richer in polymer but poorer in solvent than the other The unusual feature of the liquid liquid phase separation is that it is highly asymmetric the volume fraction of monomers at the critical point is approximately N 1 2 displaystyle N 1 2 nbsp which is very small for large polymers The amount of polymer in the solvent rich polymer poor coexisting phase is extremely small for long polymers The solvent rich phase is close to pure solvent This is peculiar to polymers a mixture of small molecules can be approximated using the Flory Huggins expression with N 1 displaystyle N 1 nbsp and then ϕ C P 1 2 displaystyle phi CP 1 2 nbsp and both coexisting phases are far from pure Polymer blends editSynthetic polymers rarely consist of chains of uniform length in solvent The Flory Huggins free energy density can be generalized 5 to an N component mixture of polymers with lengths r i displaystyle r i nbsp by f ϕ i r i i 1 N ϕ i r i ln ϕ i 1 2 i j 1 N ϕ i ϕ j x i j displaystyle f Bigl phi i r i Bigr sum i 1 N frac phi i r i ln phi i frac 1 2 sum i j 1 N phi i phi j chi ij nbsp For a binary polymer blend where one species consists of N A displaystyle N A nbsp monomers and the other N B displaystyle N B nbsp monomers this simplifies to f ϕ ϕ N A ln ϕ 1 ϕ N B ln 1 ϕ x ϕ 1 ϕ displaystyle f phi frac phi N A ln phi frac 1 phi N B ln 1 phi chi phi 1 phi nbsp As in the case for dilute polymer solutions the first two terms on the right hand side represent the entropy of mixing For large polymers of N A 1 displaystyle N A gg 1 nbsp and N B 1 displaystyle N B gg 1 nbsp these terms are negligibly small This implies that for a stable mixture to exist x lt 0 displaystyle chi lt 0 nbsp so for polymers A and B to blend their segments must attract one another 6 Limitations editFlory Huggins theory tends to agree well with experiments in the semi dilute concentration regime and can be used to fit data for even more complicated blends with higher concentrations The theory qualitatively predicts phase separation the tendency for high molecular weight species to be immiscible the x T 1 displaystyle chi propto T 1 nbsp interaction temperature dependence and other features commonly observed in polymer mixtures However unmodified Flory Huggins theory fails to predict the lower critical solution temperature observed in some polymer blends and the lack of dependence of the critical temperature T c displaystyle T c nbsp on chain length r i displaystyle r i nbsp 7 Additionally it can be shown that for a binary blend of polymer species with equal chain lengths N A N B displaystyle N A N B nbsp the critical concentration should be ps c 1 2 displaystyle psi c 1 2 nbsp however polymers blends have been observed where this parameter is highly asymmetric In certain blends mixing entropy can dominate over monomer interaction By adopting the mean field approximation x displaystyle chi nbsp parameter complex dependence on temperature blend composition and chain length was discarded Specifically interactions beyond the nearest neighbor may be highly relevant to the behavior of the blend and the distribution of polymer segments is not necessarily uniform so certain lattice sites may experience interaction energies disparate from that approximated by the mean field theory One well studied 4 6 effect on interaction energies neglected by unmodified Flory Huggins theory is chain correlation In dilute polymer mixtures where chains are well separated intramolecular forces between monomers of the polymer chain dominate and drive demixing leading to regions where polymer concentration is high As the polymer concentration increases chains tend to overlap and the effect becomes less important In fact the demarcation between dilute and semi dilute solutions is commonly defined by the concentration where polymers begin to overlap c displaystyle c nbsp which can be estimated asc m 4 3 p R g 3 displaystyle c frac m frac 4 3 pi R g 3 nbsp Here m is the mass of a single polymer chain and R g displaystyle R g nbsp is the chain s radius of gyration References edit a b Burchard W 1983 Solution Thermodyanmics of Non Ionic Water Soluble Polymers In Finch C ed Chemistry and Technology of Water Soluble Polymers Springer pp 125 142 ISBN 978 1 4757 9661 2 a b Franks F 1983 Water Solubility and Sensitivity Hydration Effects In Finch C ed Chemistry and Technology of Water Soluble Polymers Springer pp 157 178 ISBN 978 1 4757 9661 2 Dijk Menno A van Wakker Andre 1998 01 14 Concepts in Polymer Thermodynamics CRC Press pp 61 65 ISBN 978 1 56676 623 4 a b de Gennes Pierre Gilles 1979 Scaling concepts in polymer physics Ithaca N Y Cornell University Press ISBN 080141203X OCLC 4494721 Berry J et al 2018 Physical principles of intracellular organization via active and passive phase transitions Reports on Progress in Physics 81 46601 046601 Bibcode 2018RPPh 81d6601B doi 10 1088 1361 6633 aaa61e PMID 29313527 S2CID 4039711 a b Doi Masao 2013 Soft Matter Physics Great Clarendon Street Oxford UK Oxford University Press ISBN 9780199652952 Schmid Friederike 2010 Theory and Simulation of Multiphase Polymer Systems arXiv 1001 1265 cond mat soft External links edit Conformations Solutions and Molecular Weight book chapter Chapter 3 of Book Title Polymer Science and Technology by Joel R Fried 2nd Edition 2003Footnotes edit Thermodynamics of High Polymer Solutions Paul J Flory Journal of Chemical Physics August 1941 Volume 9 Issue 8 p 660 Abstract Flory suggested that Huggins name ought to be first since he had published several months earlier Flory P J Thermodynamics of high polymer solutions J Chem Phys 10 51 61 1942 Citation Classic No 18 May 6 1985 Solutions of Long Chain Compounds Maurice L Huggins Journal of Chemical Physics May 1941 Volume 9 Issue 5 p 440 Abstract We are ignoring the free volume due to molecular disorder in liquids and amorphous solids as compared to crystals This and the assumption that monomers and solute molecules are really the same size are the main geometric approximations in this model For a real synthetic polymer there is a statistical distribution of chain lengths so x displaystyle x nbsp would be an average The enthalpy is the internal energy corrected for any pressure volume work at constant external P displaystyle P nbsp We are not making any distinction here This allows the approximation of Helmholtz free energy which is the natural form of free energy from the Flory Huggins lattice theory to Gibbs free energy In fact two of the sites adjacent to a polymer segment are occupied by other polymer segments since it is part of a chain and one more making three for branching sites but only one for terminals Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Flory Huggins solution theory amp oldid 1192607161, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.