fbpx
Wikipedia

Eunotosaurus

Eunotosaurus (Latin: Stout-backed lizard) is an extinct genus of amniote, possibly a close relative of turtles. Eunotosaurus lived in the late Middle Permian (Capitanian stage) and fossils can be found in the Karoo Supergroup of South Africa. Eunotosaurus resided in the swamps of southern Africa.[1] Its ribs were wide and flat, forming broad plates similar to a primitive turtle shell, and the vertebrae were nearly identical to those of some turtles. Accordingly, it is often considered as a possible transitional fossil between turtles and their prehistoric ancestors.[2][3] However, it is possible that these turtle-like features evolved independently of the same features in turtles, since other anatomical studies and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Eunotosaurus may instead have been a parareptile,[4] an early-diverging neodiapsid unrelated to turtles,[5] or a synapsid.[6]

Eunotosaurus
Temporal range: Middle Permian, 265.8–259 Ma
Fossil specimen, on display at
Karoo National Park
Scientific classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Clade: Reptiliomorpha
Clade: Amniota
Clade: Sauropsida
Genus: Eunotosaurus
Seeley, 1892
Species:
E. africanus
Binomial name
Eunotosaurus africanus
Seeley, 1892

Description edit

Eunotosaurus reached up to 30 cm (12 in) in total body length.[7] It had a broad body formed by nine pairs of widened ribs that overlap each other. The forward-most ribs are angled slightly backward and the backward-most ribs angle slightly forward. The ribs are T-shaped in cross section, each having a broad, flat surface on the top and a narrow ridge running along its length on the bottom. The upper surface is convex, giving the body of Eunotosaurus a rounded shape. Each pair of ribs connects to an elongated dorsal or back vertebra. Most ribs are fused to the vertebrae, but some smaller specimens of Eunotosaurus have rib pairs that connect with the vertebrae but are not fused to them. There are nine dorsal vertebrae, far fewer than what is seen in other parareptiles. The neck of Eunotosaurus is short, consisting of six short cervical vertebrae.[8][7]

Histological analysis of cross-sections of the ribs indicate that they grew in three different phases as an individual developed. As is the case in most land vertebrates, the first phase involves the growth of a rib primordium that ossifies into a rib bone. The second phase, which deviates from most other land vertebrates, is the development of a shelf of bone above the main shaft of the rib to form the T-shape. The third and final phase is the widening of the lower ridge into a teardrop-like shape, reinforcing the rib. While the third phase is unique to Eunotosaurus, the second phase is also seen in modern turtles. In turtles, the shelf of bone that forms from the rib shaft becomes a plate of the shell or carapace. In each rib of Eunotosaurus, the posterior surface of the lower ridge has Sharpey's fibers embedded in it. Sharpey's fibers help anchor muscles to bone. Most amniotes have Sharpey's fibers on the posterior and anterior edges of the ribs because the ribs are connected to each other by intercostal muscles, which are muscles that assist in breathing. The lack of Sharpey's fibers on the anterior side of the ribs of Eunotosaurus suggests that it lacked functional intercostal muscles. Turtles also lack intercostal muscles and instead have muscles that connect to the undersides of the ribs for the purpose of locomotion. If Eunotosaurus is close to the ancestry of turtles, it may have had similar sets of muscles.[8]

Even though Eunotosaurus has been traditionally considered an anapsid, it is considered to possess a lower temporal fenestra, though without the temporal bar. Moreover, a juvenile specimen also shows upper temporal fenestrae, meaning the skull demonstrates a fully diapsid condition. In the adult, the upper fenestra is covered by the supratemporal bone.[9]

History of study edit

Eunotosaurus was named in 1892, but it was not until 1914 that it was proposed to be an ancestor of Chelonia, the turtle order. English zoologist D. M. S. Watson claimed that Eunotosaurus was transitional between cotylosaurs (now referred to as captorhinids) and Chelonia.[10] He compared it to "Archichelone", a name he devised for a hypothetical chelonian ancestor, noting that its ribs appeared to be intermediate between those of turtles and other tetrapods. Watson's "Archichelone" had a pelvic girdle that was pushed back on the vertebral column and placed under the shell. However, fossils of Eunotosaurus show that the pelvis is in the normal tetrapod position and is placed over the ribs rather than within them, as in modern turtles.[11] Many fossils have been found showing a semi-rigid, turtle-like rib cage, one which presumably necessitated a tortoise-like fashion of walking.[12]

Eunotosaurus was considered the ancestor of turtles up until the late 1940s. In his 1956 book Osteology of the Reptiles, American paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer claimed that Eunotosaurus could not be included within Chelonia based on the available evidence. He placed it within Anapsida in its own order incertae sedis.[11][13]

Over a century after its naming, Eunotosaurus was known from less than a dozen specimens, with very little material known from the skull. Despite the paucity of material, it was well described. Two additional skeletons were unearthed from the Karoo Supergroup and described in 1999. They are now housed in the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research in Johannesburg and the National Museum, Bloemfontein. While relatively rare, Eunotosaurus is common enough in the Karoo to be used as a biostratigraphic marker. It is present in the upper Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone and in all parts of the succeeding Pristerognathus Assemblage Zone.[14]

Classification edit

The ribs of Eunotosaurus were very wide and flat, touching each other to form broad plates similar to the carapace of a turtle. Moreover, the number of vertebrae, the size of the vertebrae, and their structure are nearly identical to those of some turtles. Despite its many similarities to turtles, Eunotosaurus has a skull that shares many characteristics with the skulls of more primitive reptiles, resulting in many studies placing it in the extinct group Parareptilia. Phylogenetic analyses that use only the physical features of fossils and living species to determine evolutionary relationships have often shown strong support for both Eunotosaurus and turtles being descendants of parareptiles, in which case Eunotosaurus.[8] However, analyses which also include genetic data from living reptiles strongly support the idea that turtles fall within a group called Diapsida, as close relatives of either lizards (in which case they would be lepidosauromorphs) or birds and crocodiles (making them archosauromorphs). According to this view, the expanded ribs and similar vertebral columns of Eunotosaurus and turtles may be a case of evolutionary convergence.[15] However, the discovery of Pappochelys, a prehistoric species whose fossil remains show a mixture of features found in Eunotosaurus and the toothed stem-turtle Odontochelys, helped to resolve the issue. Though an analysis which included data from Pappochelys found weak support for the idea that Eunotosaurus was a parareptile, it found stronger support for the hypothesis that Eunotosaurus was itself a diapsid closely related to turtles, and that its apparently primitive, anapsid skull was probably developed as part of the turtle lineage, independently of parareptiles.[16][7]

Eunotosaurus was assigned to its own family, Eunotosauridae, in 1954.[17] However, this name has fallen into disuse. In 1969, it was placed in the parareptile suborder Captorhinomorpha,[18] which is now[when?] considered to be within the clade Eureptilia.[19] In 2000, Eunotosaurus was placed in the clade Parareptilia, separate from turtles and cotylosaurs.[20] A 2008 phylogenetic analysis of parareptiles found Eunotosaurus to be the sister taxon of Milleretta and thus within the family Millerettidae.[21]

Eunotosaurus was incorporated in a recent 2010 phylogenetic analysis that sought to determine the origin of turtles.[22][7] Turtles have recently been considered diapsids on the basis of genetic and phylogenetic evidence, and thus more closely related to modern lizards, snakes, crocodiles, and birds than parareptiles. However, with the inclusion of Eunotosaurus and the Late Triassic stem turtle Proganochelys, the resulting phylogenetic tree placed turtles outside Diapsida in a position similar to turtle's original placement as parareptiles. This study claimed that Eunotosaurus shared derived features of its ribs and vertebrae with the earliest turtles, thus making it a transitional form. The study identified several features that united Eunotosaurus with turtles in a true clade.[7] These include broad T-shaped ribs, ten elongated trunk vertebrae, cranial tubercles (small projections on the surface of the skull), and a wide trunk. The clade consisting of Eunotosaurus and turtles was called Pan-Testudines (defined as all animals more closely related to turtles than to any other living group). More derived pan-testudines, such as the earliest turtle Odontochelys, have a plastron.[22]

The following cladogram shows the phylogenetic position of the Eunotosaurus, from Ruta et al., 2011.[23]

 
Life restoration

The cladogram below follows the most likely result found by another analysis of turtle relationships, published by Rainer Schoch and Hans-Dieter Sues in 2015. This study found Eunotosaurus to be an actual early stem-turtle, though other versions of the analysis found weak support for it as a parareptile.[16]

The following cladogram is adapted from a 2022 study by Simões et al. Here, Eunotosaurus was recovered as neither a parareptile or a stem-turtle, but as a basal neodiapsid located outside the reptilian crown group.[5]

References edit

  1. ^ Day, Mike; Rubidge, Bruce; Almond, John; Jirah, Sifelani (2013). "Biostratigraphic correlation in the Karoo: The case of the Middle Permian parareptile Eunotosaurus". South African Journal of Science. 109 (3/4): 4. doi:10.1590/sajs.2013/20120030. ISSN 0038-2353.
  2. ^ Cox, C.B. (1969). "The problematic Permian reptile Eunotosaurus". Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History. 18: 167–196.
  3. ^ Benton, M.J. (2016). "The Chinese Pareiasaurs". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 18 (4): 813–853. doi:10.1111/zoj.12389. hdl:1983/6d1a4f9b-a768-4b86-acb1-b3ad1f7ee885.
  4. ^ "The trouble with turtles: Paleontology at a crossroads". EARTH Magazine. Naomi Lubick. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  5. ^ a b Simões, T. R.; Kammerer, C. F.; Caldwell, M. W.; Pierce, S. E. (2022). "Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles". Science Advances. 8 (33): eabq1898. Bibcode:2022SciA....8.1898S. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abq1898. PMC 9390993. PMID 35984885.
  6. ^ Lichtig, Asher; Lucas, Spencer (2021). "Chinlechelys from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico, USA, and the origin of turtles". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi:10.26879/886. S2CID 233454789.
  7. ^ a b c d e Hans-Dieter Sues (6 August 2019). The Rise of Reptiles. 320 Million Years of Evolution. Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 49–50. ISBN 9781421428680.
  8. ^ a b c Lyson, Tyler R.; Bever, Gabe S.; Scheyer, Torsten M.; Hsiang, Allison Y.; Gauthier, Jacques A. (2013). "Evolutionary origin of the turtle shell". Current Biology. 23 (12): 1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.003. PMID 23727095.
  9. ^ Bever, G. S.; Lyson, Tyler R.; Field, Daniel J.; Bhullar, Bhart-Anjan S. (2015). "Evolutionary origin of the turtle skull". Nature. 525 (7568): 239–242. doi:10.1038/nature14900. ISSN 1476-4687.
  10. ^ Watson, D.M.S. (1914). "Eunotosaurus africanus Seeley and the ancestors of the Chelonia". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 11: 1011–1020.
  11. ^ a b Burke, A.C. (1991). "The development and evolution of the turtle body plan: Inferring intrinsic aspects of the evolutionary process from experimental embryology". American Zoologist. 31 (4): 616–627. doi:10.1093/icb/31.4.616.
  12. ^ Sumida, Stuart S; Sean Modesto (2001). "A Phylogenetic Perspective on Locomotory Strategies in Early Amniotes". Integrative and Comparative Biology. 41 (3): 586–597. doi:10.1093/icb/41.3.586.
  13. ^ Romer, A.S. (1956). Osteology of the Reptiles. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 772. ISBN 978-0-89464-985-1.
  14. ^ Rubidge, B.S.; Modesto, S.; Sidor, C.; Welman, J. (1999). (PDF). South African Journal of Science. 95: 553–555. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 July 2011. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  15. ^ . All-About-Reptiles.com. Archived from the original on 12 September 2010. Retrieved 1 August 2010.
  16. ^ a b Schoch, Rainer R.; Sues, Hans-Dieter (24 June 2015). "A Middle Triassic stem-turtle and the evolution of the turtle body plan". Nature. 523 (7562): 584–587. Bibcode:2015Natur.523..584S. doi:10.1038/nature14472. PMID 26106865. S2CID 205243837.
  17. ^ Haughton, S.H.; Brink, A.S. (1954). "A bibliographical list of Reptilia from the Karoo Beds of South Africa". Palaeontologia Africana. 2: 1–187.
  18. ^ Cox, C.B. (1969). "The problematic Permian reptile Eunotosaurus". Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology Series. 18 (5): 167–196.
  19. ^ Laurin, M.; Reisz, R.R. (1995). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x.
  20. ^ Modesto, S.P. (2000). "Eunotosaurus africanus and the Gondwanan ancestry of anapsid reptiles". Palaeontologia Africana. 36: 15–20.
  21. ^ Cisneros, J.C.; Rubidge, B.S.; Mason, R.; Dube, C. (2008). "Analysis of millerettid parareptile relationships in the light of new material of Broomia perplexa Watson, 1914, from the Permian of South Africa". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 2008 (6): 453–462. doi:10.1017/S147720190800254X. S2CID 73723455.
  22. ^ a b Lyson, T.R.; Bever, G.S.; Bhullar, B.-A.S.; Joyce, W.G.; Gauthier, J.A. (2010). "Transitional fossils and the origin of turtles". Biology Letters. 6 (6): 830–3. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0371. PMC 3001370. PMID 20534602.
  23. ^ Marcello Ruta; Juan C. Cisneros; Torsten Liebrecht; Linda A. Tsuji; Johannes Müller (2011). "Amniotes through major biological crises: faunal turnover among Parareptiles and the end-Permian mass extinction". Palaeontology. 54 (5): 1117–1137. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01051.x. S2CID 83693335.

External links edit

eunotosaurus, latin, stout, backed, lizard, extinct, genus, amniote, possibly, close, relative, turtles, lived, late, middle, permian, capitanian, stage, fossils, found, karoo, supergroup, south, africa, resided, swamps, southern, africa, ribs, were, wide, fla. Eunotosaurus Latin Stout backed lizard is an extinct genus of amniote possibly a close relative of turtles Eunotosaurus lived in the late Middle Permian Capitanian stage and fossils can be found in the Karoo Supergroup of South Africa Eunotosaurus resided in the swamps of southern Africa 1 Its ribs were wide and flat forming broad plates similar to a primitive turtle shell and the vertebrae were nearly identical to those of some turtles Accordingly it is often considered as a possible transitional fossil between turtles and their prehistoric ancestors 2 3 However it is possible that these turtle like features evolved independently of the same features in turtles since other anatomical studies and phylogenetic analyses suggest that Eunotosaurus may instead have been a parareptile 4 an early diverging neodiapsid unrelated to turtles 5 or a synapsid 6 EunotosaurusTemporal range Middle Permian 265 8 259 Ma PreꞒ Ꞓ O S D C P T J K Pg NFossil specimen on display atKaroo National ParkScientific classificationDomain EukaryotaKingdom AnimaliaPhylum ChordataClade ReptiliomorphaClade AmniotaClade SauropsidaGenus EunotosaurusSeeley 1892Species E africanusBinomial name Eunotosaurus africanusSeeley 1892 Contents 1 Description 2 History of study 3 Classification 4 References 5 External linksDescription editEunotosaurus reached up to 30 cm 12 in in total body length 7 It had a broad body formed by nine pairs of widened ribs that overlap each other The forward most ribs are angled slightly backward and the backward most ribs angle slightly forward The ribs are T shaped in cross section each having a broad flat surface on the top and a narrow ridge running along its length on the bottom The upper surface is convex giving the body of Eunotosaurus a rounded shape Each pair of ribs connects to an elongated dorsal or back vertebra Most ribs are fused to the vertebrae but some smaller specimens of Eunotosaurus have rib pairs that connect with the vertebrae but are not fused to them There are nine dorsal vertebrae far fewer than what is seen in other parareptiles The neck of Eunotosaurus is short consisting of six short cervical vertebrae 8 7 Histological analysis of cross sections of the ribs indicate that they grew in three different phases as an individual developed As is the case in most land vertebrates the first phase involves the growth of a rib primordium that ossifies into a rib bone The second phase which deviates from most other land vertebrates is the development of a shelf of bone above the main shaft of the rib to form the T shape The third and final phase is the widening of the lower ridge into a teardrop like shape reinforcing the rib While the third phase is unique to Eunotosaurus the second phase is also seen in modern turtles In turtles the shelf of bone that forms from the rib shaft becomes a plate of the shell or carapace In each rib of Eunotosaurus the posterior surface of the lower ridge has Sharpey s fibers embedded in it Sharpey s fibers help anchor muscles to bone Most amniotes have Sharpey s fibers on the posterior and anterior edges of the ribs because the ribs are connected to each other by intercostal muscles which are muscles that assist in breathing The lack of Sharpey s fibers on the anterior side of the ribs of Eunotosaurus suggests that it lacked functional intercostal muscles Turtles also lack intercostal muscles and instead have muscles that connect to the undersides of the ribs for the purpose of locomotion If Eunotosaurus is close to the ancestry of turtles it may have had similar sets of muscles 8 Even though Eunotosaurus has been traditionally considered an anapsid it is considered to possess a lower temporal fenestra though without the temporal bar Moreover a juvenile specimen also shows upper temporal fenestrae meaning the skull demonstrates a fully diapsid condition In the adult the upper fenestra is covered by the supratemporal bone 9 History of study editEunotosaurus was named in 1892 but it was not until 1914 that it was proposed to be an ancestor of Chelonia the turtle order English zoologist D M S Watson claimed that Eunotosaurus was transitional between cotylosaurs now referred to as captorhinids and Chelonia 10 He compared it to Archichelone a name he devised for a hypothetical chelonian ancestor noting that its ribs appeared to be intermediate between those of turtles and other tetrapods Watson s Archichelone had a pelvic girdle that was pushed back on the vertebral column and placed under the shell However fossils of Eunotosaurus show that the pelvis is in the normal tetrapod position and is placed over the ribs rather than within them as in modern turtles 11 Many fossils have been found showing a semi rigid turtle like rib cage one which presumably necessitated a tortoise like fashion of walking 12 Eunotosaurus was considered the ancestor of turtles up until the late 1940s In his 1956 book Osteology of the Reptiles American paleontologist Alfred Sherwood Romer claimed that Eunotosaurus could not be included within Chelonia based on the available evidence He placed it within Anapsida in its own order incertae sedis 11 13 Over a century after its naming Eunotosaurus was known from less than a dozen specimens with very little material known from the skull Despite the paucity of material it was well described Two additional skeletons were unearthed from the Karoo Supergroup and described in 1999 They are now housed in the Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Research in Johannesburg and the National Museum Bloemfontein While relatively rare Eunotosaurus is common enough in the Karoo to be used as a biostratigraphic marker It is present in the upper Tapinocephalus Assemblage Zone and in all parts of the succeeding Pristerognathus Assemblage Zone 14 Classification editThe ribs of Eunotosaurus were very wide and flat touching each other to form broad plates similar to the carapace of a turtle Moreover the number of vertebrae the size of the vertebrae and their structure are nearly identical to those of some turtles Despite its many similarities to turtles Eunotosaurus has a skull that shares many characteristics with the skulls of more primitive reptiles resulting in many studies placing it in the extinct group Parareptilia Phylogenetic analyses that use only the physical features of fossils and living species to determine evolutionary relationships have often shown strong support for both Eunotosaurus and turtles being descendants of parareptiles in which case Eunotosaurus 8 However analyses which also include genetic data from living reptiles strongly support the idea that turtles fall within a group called Diapsida as close relatives of either lizards in which case they would be lepidosauromorphs or birds and crocodiles making them archosauromorphs According to this view the expanded ribs and similar vertebral columns of Eunotosaurus and turtles may be a case of evolutionary convergence 15 However the discovery of Pappochelys a prehistoric species whose fossil remains show a mixture of features found in Eunotosaurus and the toothed stem turtle Odontochelys helped to resolve the issue Though an analysis which included data from Pappochelys found weak support for the idea that Eunotosaurus was a parareptile it found stronger support for the hypothesis that Eunotosaurus was itself a diapsid closely related to turtles and that its apparently primitive anapsid skull was probably developed as part of the turtle lineage independently of parareptiles 16 7 Eunotosaurus was assigned to its own family Eunotosauridae in 1954 17 However this name has fallen into disuse In 1969 it was placed in the parareptile suborder Captorhinomorpha 18 which is now when considered to be within the clade Eureptilia 19 In 2000 Eunotosaurus was placed in the clade Parareptilia separate from turtles and cotylosaurs 20 A 2008 phylogenetic analysis of parareptiles found Eunotosaurus to be the sister taxon of Milleretta and thus within the family Millerettidae 21 Eunotosaurus was incorporated in a recent 2010 phylogenetic analysis that sought to determine the origin of turtles 22 7 Turtles have recently been considered diapsids on the basis of genetic and phylogenetic evidence and thus more closely related to modern lizards snakes crocodiles and birds than parareptiles However with the inclusion of Eunotosaurus and the Late Triassic stem turtle Proganochelys the resulting phylogenetic tree placed turtles outside Diapsida in a position similar to turtle s original placement as parareptiles This study claimed that Eunotosaurus shared derived features of its ribs and vertebrae with the earliest turtles thus making it a transitional form The study identified several features that united Eunotosaurus with turtles in a true clade 7 These include broad T shaped ribs ten elongated trunk vertebrae cranial tubercles small projections on the surface of the skull and a wide trunk The clade consisting of Eunotosaurus and turtles was called Pan Testudines defined as all animals more closely related to turtles than to any other living group More derived pan testudines such as the earliest turtle Odontochelys have a plastron 22 The following cladogram shows the phylogenetic position of the Eunotosaurus from Ruta et al 2011 23 nbsp Life restorationParareptilia Mesosauria Brazilosaurus sanpauloensisMesosaurus tenuidensStereosternum tumidumEunotosaurus africanus Millerettidae Milleretta rubidgeiBroomia perplexa Millerosaurus nuffieldiMilleropsis priceiMillerosaurus ornatus Procolophonomorpha Australothyris smithiMicroleter mckinzieorumAnkyramorpha The cladogram below follows the most likely result found by another analysis of turtle relationships published by Rainer Schoch and Hans Dieter Sues in 2015 This study found Eunotosaurus to be an actual early stem turtle though other versions of the analysis found weak support for it as a parareptile 16 Archelosauria Archosauromorpha Lepidosauromorpha KuehneosauridaeLepidosauria SquamataRhynchocephalia Pantestudines Sauropterygia Eosauropterygia Sinosaurosphargis Placodontia Eunotosaurus Pappochelys Odontochelys Testudinata ProganochelysTestudines The following cladogram is adapted from a 2022 study by Simoes et al Here Eunotosaurus was recovered as neither a parareptile or a stem turtle but as a basal neodiapsid located outside the reptilian crown group 5 Sauropsida AcleistorhinidaeMillerettidaeMesosaurusNeoreptilia ProcolophoniaNeodiapsida YounginiformesEunotosaurusCoelurosauravusSauria LepidosauromorphaArchelosauria ArchosauromorphaTestudines PappochelysOdontochelysKayentachelysProganochelys Traditional ParareptiliaReferences edit Day Mike Rubidge Bruce Almond John Jirah Sifelani 2013 Biostratigraphic correlation in the Karoo The case of the Middle Permian parareptile Eunotosaurus South African Journal of Science 109 3 4 4 doi 10 1590 sajs 2013 20120030 ISSN 0038 2353 Cox C B 1969 The problematic Permian reptile Eunotosaurus Bulletin of the British Museum of Natural History 18 167 196 Benton M J 2016 The Chinese Pareiasaurs Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 18 4 813 853 doi 10 1111 zoj 12389 hdl 1983 6d1a4f9b a768 4b86 acb1 b3ad1f7ee885 The trouble with turtles Paleontology at a crossroads EARTH Magazine Naomi Lubick Retrieved 19 March 2014 a b Simoes T R Kammerer C F Caldwell M W Pierce S E 2022 Successive climate crises in the deep past drove the early evolution and radiation of reptiles Science Advances 8 33 eabq1898 Bibcode 2022SciA 8 1898S doi 10 1126 sciadv abq1898 PMC 9390993 PMID 35984885 Lichtig Asher Lucas Spencer 2021 Chinlechelys from the Upper Triassic of New Mexico USA and the origin of turtles Palaeontologia Electronica doi 10 26879 886 S2CID 233454789 a b c d e Hans Dieter Sues 6 August 2019 The Rise of Reptiles 320 Million Years of Evolution Johns Hopkins University Press pp 49 50 ISBN 9781421428680 a b c Lyson Tyler R Bever Gabe S Scheyer Torsten M Hsiang Allison Y Gauthier Jacques A 2013 Evolutionary origin of the turtle shell Current Biology 23 12 1 7 doi 10 1016 j cub 2013 05 003 PMID 23727095 Bever G S Lyson Tyler R Field Daniel J Bhullar Bhart Anjan S 2015 Evolutionary origin of the turtle skull Nature 525 7568 239 242 doi 10 1038 nature14900 ISSN 1476 4687 Watson D M S 1914 Eunotosaurus africanus Seeley and the ancestors of the Chelonia Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 11 1011 1020 a b Burke A C 1991 The development and evolution of the turtle body plan Inferring intrinsic aspects of the evolutionary process from experimental embryology American Zoologist 31 4 616 627 doi 10 1093 icb 31 4 616 Sumida Stuart S Sean Modesto 2001 A Phylogenetic Perspective on Locomotory Strategies in Early Amniotes Integrative and Comparative Biology 41 3 586 597 doi 10 1093 icb 41 3 586 Romer A S 1956 Osteology of the Reptiles Chicago University of Chicago Press p 772 ISBN 978 0 89464 985 1 Rubidge B S Modesto S Sidor C Welman J 1999 Eunotosaurus africanus from the Ecca Beaufort contact in Northern Cape Province South Africa implications for Karoo Basin development PDF South African Journal of Science 95 553 555 Archived from the original PDF on 16 July 2011 Retrieved 1 August 2010 Facts About Turtles Eunotosaurus And Turtle Evolution All About Reptiles com Archived from the original on 12 September 2010 Retrieved 1 August 2010 a b Schoch Rainer R Sues Hans Dieter 24 June 2015 A Middle Triassic stem turtle and the evolution of the turtle body plan Nature 523 7562 584 587 Bibcode 2015Natur 523 584S doi 10 1038 nature14472 PMID 26106865 S2CID 205243837 Haughton S H Brink A S 1954 A bibliographical list of Reptilia from the Karoo Beds of South Africa Palaeontologia Africana 2 1 187 Cox C B 1969 The problematic Permian reptile Eunotosaurus Bulletin of the British Museum Natural History Geology Series 18 5 167 196 Laurin M Reisz R R 1995 A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 113 2 165 223 doi 10 1111 j 1096 3642 1995 tb00932 x Modesto S P 2000 Eunotosaurus africanus and the Gondwanan ancestry of anapsid reptiles Palaeontologia Africana 36 15 20 Cisneros J C Rubidge B S Mason R Dube C 2008 Analysis of millerettid parareptile relationships in the light of new material of Broomia perplexa Watson 1914 from the Permian of South Africa Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2008 6 453 462 doi 10 1017 S147720190800254X S2CID 73723455 a b Lyson T R Bever G S Bhullar B A S Joyce W G Gauthier J A 2010 Transitional fossils and the origin of turtles Biology Letters 6 6 830 3 doi 10 1098 rsbl 2010 0371 PMC 3001370 PMID 20534602 Marcello Ruta Juan C Cisneros Torsten Liebrecht Linda A Tsuji Johannes Muller 2011 Amniotes through major biological crises faunal turnover among Parareptiles and the end Permian mass extinction Palaeontology 54 5 1117 1137 doi 10 1111 j 1475 4983 2011 01051 x S2CID 83693335 External links editEunotosaurus in the Paleobiology Database Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Eunotosaurus amp oldid 1214384621, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.