fbpx
Wikipedia

Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology

The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (1849, originally published 1844 under a slightly different title) is an encyclopedia/biographical dictionary. Edited by William Smith, the dictionary spans three volumes and 3,700 pages. It is a classic work of 19th-century lexicography. The work is a companion to Smith's Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities and Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography.[1]

Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology
Title page of 1867 edition
AuthorWilliam Smith
Publication date
1849
Pages3,700
TextDictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology at Wikisource

Authors and scope

 
Excerpt from Philolaus Pythagoras book, (Charles Peter Mason, 1870)

The work lists thirty-five authors in addition to the editor, who was also the author of the unsigned articles. The other authors were classical scholars, primarily from Oxford, Cambridge, Rugby School, and the University of Bonn, but some were from other institutions. Many of the mythological entries were the work of the German expatriate Leonhard Schmitz, who helped to popularise German classical scholarship in Britain.[2]

With respect to biographies, Smith intended to be comprehensive. In the preface, he writes:

The biographical articles in this work include the names of all persons of any importance which occur in the Greek and Roman writers, from the earliest times down to the extinction of the Western Empire in the year 476 of our era, and to the extinction of the Eastern Empire by the capture of Constantinople by the Turks in the year 1453.

Much of the value of the Dictionary consists not only in the depth and detail of the individual articles, but in the copious and specific citations to individual Greek and Roman writers, as well as modern scholarship from the Renaissance to the mid-nineteenth century. The articles frequently note variant traditions, disagreements among the authorities, and the interpretations of modern scholars. However, due to the variable numbering systems used in different editions of classical works, and the difficulty of recognizing typographical errors in citations, the original sources should still be checked. Many of the Dictionary's articles have been referred to in more recent works; Robert Graves has been accused of cribbing his impressive-looking source references from it when writing The Greek Myths.[3]

Samuel Sharpe thought Edward Bunbury had plagiarised his work, as he wrote of in his diary entry on 3 September 1850:

I certainly felt mortified on reading the articles on the Ptolemies in Dr. Smith's "Dictionary of Classical Biography." They were all written by E. H. Bunbury with the help of my "History of Egypt," and with-out any acknowledgment, though he even borrowed the volume from my brother Dan for the purpose.[4]

Notable authors

Use and availability today

The work is now in the public domain, and is available in several places on the Internet. A 2013 review of the fourth edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary – itself hailed in its first edition in 1949 as "the new Smith"[5] – called it:

Still surprisingly useful over factual matters that depend more or less exclusively on ancient literary sources, where its entries tend to be both thorough and accurate.[6]

Smith's dictionary, however, does have substantial flaws. Troy and Knossos, for example, "the editors still regarded... as minstrels' fantasies".[7] Much is missing, especially more recent discoveries (such as Aristotle's Constitution of the Athenians or the decipherment of Linear B) and epigraphic material. More seriously, the context in which ancient evidence is viewed, analysed, reconciled, and understood has changed considerably in the intervening centuries. Modern theories and reconstructions of events are also not present, if only because they were published decades and centuries after Smith's Dictionary.

See also

References

Citations

  1. ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Smith, Sir William" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 25 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 270.
  2. ^ Nick Lowe (20 December 2005). . Times Online. London. Archived from the original on 2016-07-01.
  3. ^ Stray 2007, p. 53. "What Graves does not mention is that the sources used for his book were culled from Smith's dictionaries, as is clear from a comparison of his reference listings with Smith's own."
  4. ^ Clayden, PW (1883). Samuel Sharpe. p. 82. Retrieved 10 May 2016.
  5. ^ Stray 2007, p. 53.
  6. ^ Green, Peter (2013). "Review: [Untitled]". The Classical Journal. 108 (3): 369–72. doi:10.5184/classicalj.108.3.0369. ISSN 0009-8353.
  7. ^ Stray 2007, p. 53. Citing Graves, R (1955). "Introduction". The Greek Myths. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Sources

  • Stray, Christopher (2007). "Sir William Smith and his dictionaries: a study in scarlet and black". Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement (101): 35–54. ISSN 2398-3264. JSTOR 43768051..

External links

  • Online version at the Perseus Digital Library
  • Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Vol. I: Abaeus–Dysponteus online at University of Michigan Library.
  • Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Vol. II: Earinus–Nyx online at University of Michigan Library.
  • Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology. Vol. III: Oarses–Zygia online at University of Michigan Library.

Also the Internet Archive has a derivative work:

  • Smith, William, ed. (1853). A new classical dictionary of biography, mythology, and geography, partly based on the "Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. London: Murray.
  • Anthon, Charles; Smith, William, eds. (1860). A new classical dictionary of Greek and Roman biography, mythology and geography: partly based upon the Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology by William Smith (1860). New York: Harper and Brothers.

dictionary, greek, roman, biography, mythology, 1849, originally, published, 1844, under, slightly, different, title, encyclopedia, biographical, dictionary, edited, william, smith, dictionary, spans, three, volumes, pages, classic, work, 19th, century, lexico. The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology 1849 originally published 1844 under a slightly different title is an encyclopedia biographical dictionary Edited by William Smith the dictionary spans three volumes and 3 700 pages It is a classic work of 19th century lexicography The work is a companion to Smith s Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities and Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography 1 Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and MythologyTitle page of 1867 editionAuthorWilliam SmithPublication date1849Pages3 700TextDictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology at Wikisource Contents 1 Authors and scope 1 1 Notable authors 2 Use and availability today 3 See also 4 References 5 External linksAuthors and scope Edit Excerpt from Philolaus Pythagoras book Charles Peter Mason 1870 The work lists thirty five authors in addition to the editor who was also the author of the unsigned articles The other authors were classical scholars primarily from Oxford Cambridge Rugby School and the University of Bonn but some were from other institutions Many of the mythological entries were the work of the German expatriate Leonhard Schmitz who helped to popularise German classical scholarship in Britain 2 With respect to biographies Smith intended to be comprehensive In the preface he writes The biographical articles in this work include the names of all persons of any importance which occur in the Greek and Roman writers from the earliest times down to the extinction of the Western Empire in the year 476 of our era and to the extinction of the Eastern Empire by the capture of Constantinople by the Turks in the year 1453 Much of the value of the Dictionary consists not only in the depth and detail of the individual articles but in the copious and specific citations to individual Greek and Roman writers as well as modern scholarship from the Renaissance to the mid nineteenth century The articles frequently note variant traditions disagreements among the authorities and the interpretations of modern scholars However due to the variable numbering systems used in different editions of classical works and the difficulty of recognizing typographical errors in citations the original sources should still be checked Many of the Dictionary s articles have been referred to in more recent works Robert Graves has been accused of cribbing his impressive looking source references from it when writing The Greek Myths 3 Samuel Sharpe thought Edward Bunbury had plagiarised his work as he wrote of in his diary entry on 3 September 1850 I certainly felt mortified on reading the articles on the Ptolemies in Dr Smith s Dictionary of Classical Biography They were all written by E H Bunbury with the help of my History of Egypt and with out any acknowledgment though he even borrowed the volume from my brother Dan for the purpose 4 Notable authors Edit John Ernest Bode Anglican hymnist Christian August Brandis German philologist Albany James Christie ecclesiastical historian Arthur Hugh Clough poet and assistant to Florence Nightingale George Cotton educationalist and Bishop of Calcutta Samuel Davidson biblical scholar William Fishburn Donkin Savilian Professor of Astronomy at the University of Oxford William Bodham Donne theatrical censor and Examiner of Plays the UK s chief theatrical censor Thomas Henry Dyer historian Edward Elder headmaster of Charterhouse and Durham School John T Graves Irish mathematician who wrote the Dictionary s biographies of the jurists Cato Crassus Drusus Gaius as well as an article on the legislation of Justinian William Alexander Greenhill physician and medical writer Wilhelm Ihne German historian Benjamin Jowett Classicist theologian and later master of Balliol College Oxford Henry Liddell headmaster of Westminster School and co author of A Greek English Lexicon George Long classicist Henry Hart Milman Anglican priest Dean of St Paul s Cathedral and Professor of Poetry in the University of Oxford Augustus De Morgan mathematician and logician William Ramsay classical scholar and Professor of Humanity in the University of Glasgow Leonhard Schmitz expatriate Prussian classicist and rector of the Royal High School Edinburgh Arthur Penrhyn Stanley theologian and later Dean of Westminster Adolf Stahr German writer and literary historian Ludwig von Urlichs German philologist and archaeologist Use and availability today EditThe work is now in the public domain and is available in several places on the Internet A 2013 review of the fourth edition of the Oxford Classical Dictionary itself hailed in its first edition in 1949 as the new Smith 5 called it Still surprisingly useful over factual matters that depend more or less exclusively on ancient literary sources where its entries tend to be both thorough and accurate 6 Smith s dictionary however does have substantial flaws Troy and Knossos for example the editors still regarded as minstrels fantasies 7 Much is missing especially more recent discoveries such as Aristotle s Constitution of the Athenians or the decipherment of Linear B and epigraphic material More seriously the context in which ancient evidence is viewed analysed reconciled and understood has changed considerably in the intervening centuries Modern theories and reconstructions of events are also not present if only because they were published decades and centuries after Smith s Dictionary See also EditDictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities Dictionary of Greek and Roman GeographyReferences EditCitations Chisholm Hugh ed 1911 Smith Sir William Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 25 11th ed Cambridge University Press p 270 Nick Lowe 20 December 2005 Killing the Graves myth Times Online London Archived from the original on 2016 07 01 Stray 2007 p 53 What Graves does not mention is that the sources used for his book were culled from Smith s dictionaries as is clear from a comparison of his reference listings with Smith s own Clayden PW 1883 Samuel Sharpe p 82 Retrieved 10 May 2016 Stray 2007 p 53 Green Peter 2013 Review Untitled The Classical Journal 108 3 369 72 doi 10 5184 classicalj 108 3 0369 ISSN 0009 8353 Stray 2007 p 53 Citing Graves R 1955 Introduction The Greek Myths Harmondsworth Penguin Sources Stray Christopher 2007 Sir William Smith and his dictionaries a study in scarlet and black Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies Supplement 101 35 54 ISSN 2398 3264 JSTOR 43768051 External links Edit Wikimedia Commons has media related to The Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Wikisource has original text related to this article Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Online version at the Perseus Digital Library Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Vol I Abaeus Dysponteus online at University of Michigan Library Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Vol II Earinus Nyx online at University of Michigan Library Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology Vol III Oarses Zygia online at University of Michigan Library Also the Internet Archive has a derivative work Smith William ed 1853 A new classical dictionary of biography mythology and geography partly based on the Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology London Murray Anthon Charles Smith William eds 1860 A new classical dictionary of Greek and Roman biography mythology and geography partly based upon the Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology by William Smith 1860 New York Harper and Brothers Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology amp oldid 1127283863, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.