fbpx
Wikipedia

Bound state

A bound state is a composite of two or more fundamental building blocks, such as particles, atoms, or bodies, that behaves as a single object and in which energy is required to split them.[1]

In quantum physics, a bound state is a quantum state of a particle subject to a potential such that the particle has a tendency to remain localized in one or more regions of space. The potential may be external or it may be the result of the presence of another particle; in the latter case, one can equivalently define a bound state as a state representing two or more particles whose interaction energy exceeds the total energy of each separate particle. One consequence is that, given a potential vanishing at infinity, negative-energy states must be bound. In general, the energy spectrum of the set of bound states is discrete, unlike free particles, which have a continuous spectrum.

Although not bound states in the strict sense, metastable states with a net positive interaction energy, but long decay time, are often considered unstable bound states as well and are called "quasi-bound states".[2] Examples include certain radionuclides and electrets.[clarification needed][citation needed]

In relativistic quantum field theory, a stable bound state of n particles with masses corresponds to a pole in the S-matrix with a center-of-mass energy less than . An unstable bound state shows up as a pole with a complex center-of-mass energy.

Examples edit

 
An overview of the various families of elementary and composite particles, and the theories describing their interactions

Definition edit

Let H be a complex separable Hilbert space,   be a one-parameter group of unitary operators on H and   be a statistical operator on H. Let A be an observable on H and   be the induced probability distribution of A with respect to ρ on the Borel σ-algebra of  . Then the evolution of ρ induced by U is bound with respect to A if  , where  .[dubious ][citation needed]

More informally, a bound state is contained within a bounded portion of the spectrum of A. For a concrete example: let   and let A be position. Given compactly-supported   and  .

  • If the state evolution of ρ "moves this wave package constantly to the right", e.g. if   for all  , then ρ is not bound state with respect to position.
  • If   does not change in time, i.e.   for all  , then   is bound with respect to position.
  • More generally: If the state evolution of ρ "just moves ρ inside a bounded domain", then ρ is bound with respect to position.

Properties edit

Let A have measure-space codomain  . A quantum particle is in a bound state if it is never found “too far away from any finite region  ”, i.e. using a wavefunction representation,

 

Consequently,   is finite. In other words, a state is a bound state if and only if it is finitely normalizable.

As finitely normalizable states must lie within the discrete part of the spectrum, bound states must lie within the discrete part. However, as Neumann and Wigner pointed out, a bound state can have its energy located in the continuum spectrum.[7] In that case, bound states still are part of the discrete portion of the spectrum, but appear as Dirac masses in the spectral measure.[citation needed]

Position-bound states edit

Consider the one-particle Schrödinger equation. If a state has energy  , then the wavefunction ψ satisfies, for some  

 

so that ψ is exponentially suppressed at large x.[dubious ] Hence, negative energy-states are bound if V vanishes at infinity.

Requirements edit

A boson with mass mχ mediating a weakly coupled interaction produces an Yukawa-like interaction potential,

 ,

where  , g is the gauge coupling constant, and ƛi = /mic is the reduced Compton wavelength. A scalar boson produces a universally attractive potential, whereas a vector attracts particles to antiparticles but repels like pairs. For two particles of mass m1 and m2, the Bohr radius of the system becomes

 

and yields the dimensionless number

 .

In order for the first bound state to exist at all,  . Because the photon is massless, D is infinite for electromagnetism. For the weak interaction, the Z boson's mass is 91.1876±0.0021 GeV/c2, which prevents the formation of bound states between most particles, as it is 97.2 times the proton's mass and 178,000 times the electron's mass.

Note however that if the Higgs interaction didn't break electroweak symmetry at the electroweak scale, then the SU(2) weak interaction would become confining.[8]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "Bound state - Oxford Reference".
  2. ^ Sakurai, Jun (1995). "7.8". In Tuan, San (ed.). Modern Quantum Mechanics (Revised ed.). Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. pp. 418–9. ISBN 0-201-53929-2. Suppose the barrier were infinitely high ... we expect bound states, with energy E > 0. ... They are stationary states with infinite lifetime. In the more realistic case of a finite barrier, the particle can be trapped inside, but it cannot be trapped forever. Such a trapped state has a finite lifetime due to quantum-mechanical tunneling. ... Let us call such a state quasi-bound state because it would be an honest bound state if the barrier were infinitely high.
  3. ^ K. Winkler; G. Thalhammer; F. Lang; R. Grimm; J. H. Denschlag; A. J. Daley; A. Kantian; H. P. Buchler; P. Zoller (2006). "Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice". Nature. 441 (7095): 853–856. arXiv:cond-mat/0605196. Bibcode:2006Natur.441..853W. doi:10.1038/nature04918. PMID 16778884. S2CID 2214243.
  4. ^ Javanainen, Juha; Odong Otim; Sanders, Jerome C. (Apr 2010). "Dimer of two bosons in a one-dimensional optical lattice". Phys. Rev. A. 81 (4): 043609. arXiv:1004.5118. Bibcode:2010PhRvA..81d3609J. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.81.043609. S2CID 55445588.
  5. ^ M. Valiente & D. Petrosyan (2008). "Two-particle states in the Hubbard model". J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 41 (16): 161002. arXiv:0805.1812. Bibcode:2008JPhB...41p1002V. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/41/16/161002. S2CID 115168045.
  6. ^ Max T. C. Wong & C. K. Law (May 2011). "Two-polariton bound states in the Jaynes-Cummings-Hubbard model". Phys. Rev. A. American Physical Society. 83 (5): 055802. arXiv:1101.1366. Bibcode:2011PhRvA..83e5802W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.83.055802. S2CID 119200554.
  7. ^ von Neumann, John; Wigner, Eugene (1929). "Über merkwürdige diskrete Eigenwerte". Physikalische Zeitschrift. 30: 465–467.
  8. ^ Claudson, M.; Farhi, E.; Jaffe, R. L. (1 August 1986). "Strongly coupled standard model". Physical Review D. 34 (3): 873–887. Bibcode:1986PhRvD..34..873C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.34.873. PMID 9957220.

Further reading edit

  • Blanchard, Philippe; Brüning, Edward (2015). "Some Applications of the Spectral Representation". Mathematical Methods in Physics: Distributions, Hilbert Space Operators, Variational Methods, and Applications in Quantum Physics (2nd ed.). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 431. ISBN 978-3-319-14044-5.
  • Gustafson, Stephen J.; Sigal, Israel Michael (2011). "Spectrum and Dynamics". Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p. 50. ISBN 978-3-642-21865-1.
  • Ruelle, David (9 January 2016). "A Remark on Bound States in Potential-Scattering Theory" (PDF). Nuovo Cimento A. 61 (June 1969): 655–662. doi:10.1007/BF02819607. S2CID 56050354. Retrieved 27 December 2021.

bound, state, bound, state, composite, more, fundamental, building, blocks, such, particles, atoms, bodies, that, behaves, single, object, which, energy, required, split, them, quantum, physics, bound, state, quantum, state, particle, subject, potential, such,. A bound state is a composite of two or more fundamental building blocks such as particles atoms or bodies that behaves as a single object and in which energy is required to split them 1 In quantum physics a bound state is a quantum state of a particle subject to a potential such that the particle has a tendency to remain localized in one or more regions of space The potential may be external or it may be the result of the presence of another particle in the latter case one can equivalently define a bound state as a state representing two or more particles whose interaction energy exceeds the total energy of each separate particle One consequence is that given a potential vanishing at infinity negative energy states must be bound In general the energy spectrum of the set of bound states is discrete unlike free particles which have a continuous spectrum Although not bound states in the strict sense metastable states with a net positive interaction energy but long decay time are often considered unstable bound states as well and are called quasi bound states 2 Examples include certain radionuclides and electrets clarification needed citation needed In relativistic quantum field theory a stable bound state of n particles with masses m k k 1 n displaystyle m k k 1 n corresponds to a pole in the S matrix with a center of mass energy less than k m k displaystyle textstyle sum k m k An unstable bound state shows up as a pole with a complex center of mass energy Contents 1 Examples 2 Definition 3 Properties 3 1 Position bound states 4 Requirements 5 See also 6 References 7 Further readingExamples edit nbsp An overview of the various families of elementary and composite particles and the theories describing their interactionsA proton and an electron can move separately when they do the total center of mass energy is positive and such a pair of particles can be described as an ionized atom Once the electron starts to orbit the proton the energy becomes negative and a bound state namely the hydrogen atom is formed Only the lowest energy bound state the ground state is stable Other excited states are unstable and will decay into stable but not other unstable bound states with less energy by emitting a photon A positronium atom is an unstable bound state of an electron and a positron It decays into photons Any state in the quantum harmonic oscillator is bound but has positive energy Note that lim x V QHO x displaystyle lim x to pm infty V text QHO x infty nbsp so the below does not apply A nucleus is a bound state of protons and neutrons nucleons The proton itself is a bound state of three quarks two up and one down one red one green and one blue However unlike the case of the hydrogen atom the individual quarks can never be isolated See confinement The Hubbard and Jaynes Cummings Hubbard JCH models support similar bound states In the Hubbard model two repulsive bosonic atoms can form a bound pair in an optical lattice 3 4 5 The JCH Hamiltonian also supports two polariton bound states when the photon atom interaction is sufficiently strong 6 Definition editLet H be a complex separable Hilbert space U U t t R displaystyle U lbrace U t mid t in mathbb R rbrace nbsp be a one parameter group of unitary operators on H and r r t 0 displaystyle rho rho t 0 nbsp be a statistical operator on H Let A be an observable on H and m A r displaystyle mu A rho nbsp be the induced probability distribution of A with respect to r on the Borel s algebra of R displaystyle mathbb R nbsp Then the evolution of r induced by U is bound with respect to A if lim R sup t t 0 m A r t R gt R 0 displaystyle lim R rightarrow infty sup t geq t 0 mu A rho t mathbb R gt R 0 nbsp where R gt R x R x gt R displaystyle mathbb R gt R lbrace x in mathbb R mid x gt R rbrace nbsp dubious discuss citation needed More informally a bound state is contained within a bounded portion of the spectrum of A For a concrete example let H L 2 R displaystyle H L 2 mathbb R nbsp and let A be position Given compactly supported r r 0 H displaystyle rho rho 0 in H nbsp and 1 1 S u p p r displaystyle 1 1 subseteq mathrm Supp rho nbsp If the state evolution of r moves this wave package constantly to the right e g if t 1 t 1 S u p p r t displaystyle t 1 t 1 in mathrm Supp rho t nbsp for all t 0 displaystyle t geq 0 nbsp then r is not bound state with respect to position If r displaystyle rho nbsp does not change in time i e r t r displaystyle rho t rho nbsp for all t 0 displaystyle t geq 0 nbsp then r displaystyle rho nbsp is bound with respect to position More generally If the state evolution of r just moves r inside a bounded domain then r is bound with respect to position Properties editLet A have measure space codomain X m displaystyle X mu nbsp A quantum particle is in a bound state if it is never found too far away from any finite region R X displaystyle R subseteq X nbsp i e using a wavefunction representation 0 lim R P particle measured inside X R lim R X R ps x 2 d m x displaystyle begin aligned 0 amp lim R to infty mathbb P text particle measured inside X setminus R amp lim R to infty int X setminus R psi x 2 d mu x end aligned nbsp Consequently X ps x 2 d m x textstyle int X psi x 2 d mu x nbsp is finite In other words a state is a bound state if and only if it is finitely normalizable As finitely normalizable states must lie within the discrete part of the spectrum bound states must lie within the discrete part However as Neumann and Wigner pointed out a bound state can have its energy located in the continuum spectrum 7 In that case bound states still are part of the discrete portion of the spectrum but appear as Dirac masses in the spectral measure citation needed Position bound states edit Consider the one particle Schrodinger equation If a state has energy E lt max lim x V x lim x V x textstyle E lt max left lim x to infty V x lim x to infty V x right nbsp then the wavefunction ps satisfies for some X gt 0 displaystyle X gt 0 nbsp ps ps 2 m ℏ 2 V x E gt 0 for x gt X displaystyle frac psi prime prime psi frac 2m hbar 2 V x E gt 0 text for x gt X nbsp so that ps is exponentially suppressed at large x dubious discuss Hence negative energy states are bound if V vanishes at infinity Requirements editA boson with mass mx mediating a weakly coupled interaction produces an Yukawa like interaction potential V r a x r e r l x displaystyle V r pm frac alpha chi r e frac r lambda frac chi nbsp where a x g 2 4 p displaystyle alpha chi g 2 4 pi nbsp g is the gauge coupling constant and ƛi ℏ mic is the reduced Compton wavelength A scalar boson produces a universally attractive potential whereas a vector attracts particles to antiparticles but repels like pairs For two particles of mass m1 and m2 the Bohr radius of the system becomes a 0 l 1 l 2 a x displaystyle a 0 frac lambda underline 1 lambda underline 2 alpha chi nbsp and yields the dimensionless number D l x a 0 a x l x l 1 l 2 a x m 1 m 2 m x displaystyle D frac lambda underline chi a 0 alpha chi frac lambda underline chi lambda underline 1 lambda underline 2 alpha chi frac m 1 m 2 m chi nbsp In order for the first bound state to exist at all D 0 8 displaystyle D gtrsim 0 8 nbsp Because the photon is massless D is infinite for electromagnetism For the weak interaction the Z boson s mass is 91 1876 0 0021 GeV c2 which prevents the formation of bound states between most particles as it is 97 2 times the proton s mass and 178 000 times the electron s mass Note however that if the Higgs interaction didn t break electroweak symmetry at the electroweak scale then the SU 2 weak interaction would become confining 8 See also editComposite field Resonance particle physics Bethe Salpeter equation Cooper pairReferences edit Bound state Oxford Reference Sakurai Jun 1995 7 8 In Tuan San ed Modern Quantum Mechanics Revised ed Reading Mass Addison Wesley pp 418 9 ISBN 0 201 53929 2 Suppose the barrier were infinitely high we expect bound states with energy E gt 0 They are stationary states with infinite lifetime In the more realistic case of a finite barrier the particle can be trapped inside but it cannot be trapped forever Such a trapped state has a finite lifetime due to quantum mechanical tunneling Let us call such a state quasi bound state because it would be an honest bound state if the barrier were infinitely high K Winkler G Thalhammer F Lang R Grimm J H Denschlag A J Daley A Kantian H P Buchler P Zoller 2006 Repulsively bound atom pairs in an optical lattice Nature 441 7095 853 856 arXiv cond mat 0605196 Bibcode 2006Natur 441 853W doi 10 1038 nature04918 PMID 16778884 S2CID 2214243 Javanainen Juha Odong Otim Sanders Jerome C Apr 2010 Dimer of two bosons in a one dimensional optical lattice Phys Rev A 81 4 043609 arXiv 1004 5118 Bibcode 2010PhRvA 81d3609J doi 10 1103 PhysRevA 81 043609 S2CID 55445588 M Valiente amp D Petrosyan 2008 Two particle states in the Hubbard model J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 41 16 161002 arXiv 0805 1812 Bibcode 2008JPhB 41p1002V doi 10 1088 0953 4075 41 16 161002 S2CID 115168045 Max T C Wong amp C K Law May 2011 Two polariton bound states in the Jaynes Cummings Hubbard model Phys Rev A American Physical Society 83 5 055802 arXiv 1101 1366 Bibcode 2011PhRvA 83e5802W doi 10 1103 PhysRevA 83 055802 S2CID 119200554 von Neumann John Wigner Eugene 1929 Uber merkwurdige diskrete Eigenwerte Physikalische Zeitschrift 30 465 467 Claudson M Farhi E Jaffe R L 1 August 1986 Strongly coupled standard model Physical Review D 34 3 873 887 Bibcode 1986PhRvD 34 873C doi 10 1103 PhysRevD 34 873 PMID 9957220 Further reading editBlanchard Philippe Bruning Edward 2015 Some Applications of the Spectral Representation Mathematical Methods in Physics Distributions Hilbert Space Operators Variational Methods and Applications in Quantum Physics 2nd ed Switzerland Springer International Publishing p 431 ISBN 978 3 319 14044 5 Gustafson Stephen J Sigal Israel Michael 2011 Spectrum and Dynamics Mathematical Concepts of Quantum Mechanics 2nd ed Berlin Heidelberg Springer Verlag p 50 ISBN 978 3 642 21865 1 Ruelle David 9 January 2016 A Remark on Bound States in Potential Scattering Theory PDF Nuovo Cimento A 61 June 1969 655 662 doi 10 1007 BF02819607 S2CID 56050354 Retrieved 27 December 2021 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Bound state amp oldid 1179918612, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.