Bird–window collisions

Bird–window collisions (also known as bird strikes after the aviation term or as window strikes) are a problem in both low- and high-density areas worldwide. Birds strike glass because reflective or transparent glass is often invisible to them.^[1] It is estimated that between 100 million and 1 billion birds are killed by collisions in the United States annually,^[2] and an estimated 16 to 42 million birds are likewise killed each year in Canada.^[3]

Imprint from where a bird has struck a window

Window collision variables

The issue of bird-window collisions has become more prevalent as wild habitat is lost.^[4] It has intensified as landscaping and exterior glass continue to become more popular. However, due to differences within the taxon, built environments, time of year, and other effects, there is great variation in the nature and frequency of collisions.

Susceptible species

 

A common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) that died after flying into a window

Studies analyzing window collisions across greater spatial scales reveal interesting trends in species composition, indicating that some birds are more vulnerable to collisions than others.^[5] This most likely depends on differing morphology and physical flight characteristics of birds, but more subtle differences between groups are also thought to contribute to differences in vulnerability. Examples include differences in vision, degree of flocking, flight behaviors, and more specific life history traits, such as provisioning of young.^[6]

Species of warblers, thrushes, sparrows, hummingbirds, and vireos are among the most susceptible, with Bay-breasted Warblers, Ovenbirds, Red-eyed Vireos, and Blackpoll Warblers being the most notable.^[5] The reason for these species' vulnerability is not well understood, but it is speculated that species-specific behaviors are a likely contributor, as other factors like flight altitude differ greatly between these groups. Many of these birds have been documented as being especially attracted to lit structures. Warblers, thrushes, and vireos are known to make quick flight movements through densely vegetated areas, and are thought to be heavily guided by light in flight, which could account for this susceptibility to light disruption.^[7] Further, some of these species, such as thrushes and ovenbirds, spend more time near the ground, which is another characteristic shared among many common window-strike victims.^[2] Species like Cedar Waxwings, which make up a disproportionately high amount of window collisions in the fall and winter, are thought to be susceptible due to their flocking behaviors.^[6] During these months, waxwings forage in large flocks to more efficiently search for berries. It is thought that this seasonal increase in collisions is due to their increased concentration of movement, and perhaps because flocking birds are less attentive to their surroundings, opting to follow the lead bird in the flock.^[8]

There are also patterns of species mortality across different building types, which are most likely due to differences in flight behavior. For instance, Golden-winged Warblers and Canada Warblers are most at risk at low-rises and high-rises, Painted Buntings at low-rises, Worm-eating Warblers at high-rises and Wood Thrushes at residences.^[9]

It has been observed that many species which are very high in abundance in urban areas, such as House Sparrows, are killed at relatively low rates, further indicating that species mortality is not dependent on density.^[10]

Building properties

 

Nearby vegetation reflected in glass

The number of observed bird fatalities caused by any given building varies greatly across a spatial scale. There is a positive correlation between the number of collisions which occur at a building and the amount of the building surface area which is covered with windows.^[11] This is heavily evidenced by high levels of mortality at large commercial buildings.^[5] Further, buildings located in more developed areas experience fewer collisions than those in less-developed areas, due to effects of proximity to forested patches.^[11] This is most noticeable in residences across a rural-urban gradient, where per-building mortality rates are higher in rural areas. However, despite causing the lowest total mortality, more recent studies reveal that high-rise buildings have the highest median annual mortality rates.^[9]

The presence and height of vegetation surrounding a building is also positively correlated with bird mortalities.^[9] This is because highly reflective windows create an illusion of vegetation that birds can fly into, and birds are unable to recognize the cues of a window the way that humans do. A study conducted in Manhattan found support for the hypothesis that most collisions occur during daytime hours, when birds are foraging for food, due to the high number of collisions that occurred at windowed exteriors incorporating vegetation.^[12]

Building layout, orientation, and spacing within a city is another a contributing factor to bird-window collisions, as we often see topographical features within urban planning that channel or concentrate bird movements.^[6] Structures are at a greater risk of causing bird fatalities when located near areas that support high densities of birds. Urban greenspaces are one example, used by many species of songbird for foraging, breeding, or as migratory stopover sites. We may also see channeling effects at a fine scale, when architectural corridors guide bird flight paths into areas of increased collision risk.^[13]

Seasonality

Collisions appear to happen less frequently during the winter and more frequently during peak migration periods,^[11] though seasonal patterns of mortality are difficult to detect due to limited availability of studies that survey collisions throughout the year. However, it is generally understood that there are increases in bird collisions during fall and spring migrations due to greater movement in bird populations, and because birds are less familiar with the landscape along their migratory routes.^[6] Additionally, fatalities in fall migration are consistently greater than in spring migration, which is likely due to a larger proportion of young, relatively inexperienced birds.^[9]

Light emissions

 

Haze created by light pollution in an urban center

Bird mortality rates increase with the amount of light that is emitted from a given building^[14] and bird species that migrate at night are particularly vulnerable to collisions, which is thought to be attributed to fatal entrapment by light-emitting structures.^[5] While there are various explanations for why nocturnally migrating birds are attracted to artificial lights, we do know that birds rely on a variety of cues for migration, with the orientation of the stars being a major reference for nocturnal migrants.^[15] It is therefore speculated that these artificially illuminated areas conceal the visual navigation cues that these birds rely on, resulting in them becoming disoriented.^[6] This hypothesis has been well supported by several observations of birds being attracted to and disoriented by lights, particularly in conditions of poor-visibility, which makes them more susceptible to colliding with buildings.

In addition, birds may also be impacted by bright lights at nights as they have extra-retinal photoreceptors that are disoriented by the reflection of light from these buildings.^[16] Mitigating the amount of light emitted from glass surfaces at night, such as windows, can reduce the amount of fatal bird collisions with buildings and structures.^[17]

Weather conditions

Weather conditions influence bird flight behavior in ways that make them more or less susceptible to collisions.^[18] Conditions which reduce visibility, such as fog, rain, or snow, can disorient birds, especially those that migrate at night and rely on visual cues. Low wind speeds can also result in poor lift for larger, soaring raptors, which can lead to collisions with skyscrapers.^[19] Other factors, including humidity and air temperature, can also influence flight altitudes of birds in ways that influence risk of collision.^[20] Some of the highest reports of bird fatalities from window collisions have occurred when migrating passerines began their journey in good weather conditions, but hit a cold front which forced them to lower altitudes.^[5]

Solutions

 

Windows fitted with a dotted grid pattern to prevent bird collisions

There are several methods of preventing bird-window strikes. The use of ultraviolet (UV) signals to make windows appear visible to birds, while once one of the most common means of combatting this issue, is no longer recommended by experts. This is because while some birds can see UV light, not all can. Other solutions include window film (as long as it is placed on the exterior of the glass) and ceramic frit glass (glass with frit dots). ^[21] Windows can also be covered with decals spaced no more than 5 cm horizontally or 10 cm vertically to prevent collisions.^[5] It has been found that silhouettes of predatory birds posted on windows do not significantly decrease collision rates. This is because there is too much exposed glass, which the bird can try to fly through. Treatments placed on the inside of windows are not effective either, because they typically do not diminish the glare or reflection.^[21]

Monitoring and legislation

Many bird-rescue organizations have come about in recent years. Examples include Chicago Bird Collision Monitors, Toronto's Fatal Light Awareness Program (FLAP), and New York City Audubon's Project Safe Flight, which all have documented thousands of bird collisions due to human-made structures.^[22] Monitoring programs such as these are becoming more and more common at a local level, and rely heavily on participation from volunteer groups.

Further, governments of Canada and the United States have recently introduced legislation to make new and existing buildings bird friendly. Examples include Toronto's Bird-Friendly Development Guidelines,^[23] Chicago's Design Guide For Bird-Safe Buildings New Construction And Renovation,^[24] and Evanston's Bird-Friendly Building Design Ordinance.^[25] On the Federal level the Federal Bird-Safe Buildings Act of 2011^[26] calls for each public building constructed, acquired, or altered by the General Services Administration (GSA) to incorporate bird-safe building materials and design features. The legislation would require GSA to take similar actions on existing buildings, where practicable.

In New York City, where an estimated 230,000 birds collide with buildings each year, New York's Bird Friendly-Buildings Act^[27] required new and existing building be bird friendly effective Jan 1, 2012. In December 2019, a bill passed mandating that the lowest 75 feet of new buildings, and structures above a green roof, must use materials such as patterned glass which are visible to flying birds. Compliance with these new standards will also be required for building renovations beginning in December 2020.^[28]

See also

• Ecological light pollution
• Skyglow
• Towerkill with antenna towers and masts
• Bird strike with cars or planes

References

1. "Why Birds Hit Glass".
2. Klem, Daniel (1991). "Glass and bird kills: an overview and suggested planning and design methods of preventing a fatal hazard". In Adams, Lowell W.; Leedy, Daniel L. (eds.). Wildlife Conservation in Metropolitan Environments. National Institute for Urban Wildlife. pp. 99–104. ISBN 978-0-942015-03-4.
3. Machtans, Craig S.; Wedeles, Christopher H. R.; Bayne, Erin M. (2013). "A First Estimate for Canada of the Number of Birds Killed by Colliding with Building Windows". Avian Conservation and Ecology. 8 (2): art6. doi:10.5751/ace-00568-080206.
4. Shochat, Eyal; Lerman, Susannah; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban (2015). "Birds in Urban Ecosystems: Population Dynamics, Community Structure, Biodiversity, and Conservation". Urban Ecosystem Ecology. Agronomy Monographs. pp. 75–86. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr55.c4. ISBN 978-0-89118-181-1.
5. Ogden, Lesley J. Evans (1996). Collision course: the hazards of lighted structures and windows to migrating birds. World Wildlife Fund Canada. OCLC 754887606.^{[page needed]}
6. Drewitt, Allan L.; Langston, Rowena H.W. (June 2008). "Collision Effects of Wind-power Generators and Other Obstacles on Birds". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1134 (1): 233–266. Bibcode:2008NYASA1134..233D. doi:10.1196/annals.1439.015. PMID 18566097. S2CID 26115688.
7. Snyder, L. L. (1 November 1946). "'Tunnel Fliers' and Window Fatalities". The Condor. 48 (6): 278. doi:10.1093/condor/48.6.278 (inactive 31 January 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of January 2024 (link)
8. Alonso, J. A. (1999). Birds and powerlines, Quercus, Madrid. pp. 57–82.
9. Loss, Scott R.; Will, Tom; Loss, Sara S.; Marra, Peter P. (1 February 2014). "Bird–building collisions in the United States: Estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability". The Condor. 116 (1): 8–23. doi:10.1650/condor-13-090.1. S2CID 11925316.
10. Hager, Stephen B.; Trudell, Heidi; McKay, Kelly J.; Crandall, Stephanie M.; Mayer, Lance (September 2008). "Bird density and mortality at windows". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 120 (3): 550–564. doi:10.1676/07-075.1. S2CID 54083247.
11. Hager, Stephen B.; Cosentino, Bradley J.; McKay, Kelly J.; Monson, Cathleen; Zuurdeeg, Walt; Blevins, Brian (9 January 2013). "Window Area and Development Drive Spatial Variation in Bird-Window Collisions in an Urban Landscape". PLOS ONE. 8 (1): e53371. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...853371H. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053371. PMC 3541239. PMID 23326420.
12. Gelb, Yigal; Delacretaz, Nicole (September 2009). "Windows and Vegetation: Primary Factors in Manhattan Bird Collisions". Northeastern Naturalist. 16 (3): 455–470. doi:10.1656/045.016.n312. S2CID 86509221.
13. Basilio, Lay G.; Moreno, Daniele J.; Piratelli, Augusto J. (2020-03-16). "Main causes of bird-window collisions: a review". Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências. 92: e20180745. doi:10.1590/0001-3765202020180745. ISSN 0001-3765.
14. Evans Ogden, Lesley J (2002). Summary report on the Bird Friendly Building Program: effect of light reduction on collision of migratory birds. Fatal Light Awareness Program. OCLC 890665413.^{[page needed]}
15. Berthold, P. (1990). "Genetics of Migration". Bird Migration. pp. 269–280. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74542-3_18. ISBN 978-3-642-74544-7.
16. Smith, Reyd A.; Gagné, Maryse; Fraser, Kevin C. (January 2021). "Pre-migration artificial light at night advances the spring migration timing of a trans-hemispheric migratory songbird". Environmental Pollution. 269: 116136. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116136. ISSN 0269-7491. PMID 33280918. S2CID 227519492.
17. Lao, Sirena; Robertson, Bruce A.; Anderson, Abigail W.; Blair, Robert B.; Eckles, Joanna W.; Turner, Reed J.; Loss, Scott R. (January 2020). "The influence of artificial light at night and polarized light on bird-building collisions". Biological Conservation. 241: 108358. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108358. ISSN 0006-3207. S2CID 213571293.
18. Richardson, W John (2000). "Bird Migration and Wind Turbines: Migration Timing, Flight Behavior, and Collision Risk". Proceedings of the National Avian - Wind Power Planning Meeting III. pp. 132–140.
19. Barrios, Luis; Rodríguez, Alejandro (12 February 2004). "Behavioural and environmental correlates of soaring-bird mortality at on-shore wind turbines: Bird mortality at wind power plants". Journal of Applied Ecology. 41 (1): 72–81. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00876.x. hdl:10261/39773.
20. Alerstam, Thomas (1990). Bird migration. Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-521-32865-4. OCLC 243697370.^{[page needed]}
21. Klem, Daniel (June 2009). "Preventing Bird–Window Collisions". The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 121 (2): 314–321. doi:10.1676/08-118.1. S2CID 198153230.
22. "Millions of Migratory Birds Catch a Break as NYC Passes Bird-Friendly Building Law". Audubon. 2019-12-10. Retrieved 2022-11-15.
23. (PDF). Toronto.ca. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-06-03. Retrieved 2015-10-04.
24. [1] September 27, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
25. "News List | City of Evanston".
26. "Text of H.R. 1643 (112th): Federal Bird-Safe Buildings Act of 2011 (Introduced version)". GovTrack.us. 2011-04-15. Retrieved 2015-10-04.
27. . M.nysenate.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-06-16. Retrieved 2015-10-04.
28. Poon, Linda (December 13, 2019). "NYC Is Making Its Buildings Bird-Friendly". Bloomberg. from the original on 2019-12-13. Retrieved 2019-12-28.

External links

• Fatal Light Awareness Program
• Acopian Center for Ornithology
• Instructions to make your own Acopian BirdSavers to prevent birds from flying into windows - tested by Muhlenburg College's Center for Ornithology
• Bird-friendly Design, American Bird Conservancy