fbpx
Wikipedia

Young's inequality for products

In mathematics, Young's inequality for products is a mathematical inequality about the product of two numbers.[1] The inequality is named after William Henry Young and should not be confused with Young's convolution inequality.

Young's inequality for products can be used to prove Hölder's inequality. It is also widely used to estimate the norm of nonlinear terms in PDE theory, since it allows one to estimate a product of two terms by a sum of the same terms raised to a power and scaled.

Standard version for conjugate Hölder exponents edit

The standard form of the inequality is the following:

Theorem — If   and   are nonnegative real numbers and if   and   are real numbers such that   then

 

Equality holds if and only if  

It can be used to prove Hölder's inequality.

Proof[2]

Since     A graph   on the  -plane is thus also a graph   From sketching a visual representation of the integrals of the area between this curve and the axes, and the area in the rectangle bounded by the lines   and the fact that   is always increasing for increasing   and vice versa, we can see that   upper bounds the area of the rectangle below the curve (with equality when  ) and   upper bounds the area of the rectangle above the curve (with equality when  ). Thus,   with equality when   (or equivalently,  ). Young's inequality follows from evaluating the integrals. (See below for a generalization.)

This form of Young's inequality can also be proved via Jensen's inequality.

Proof[3]

The claim is certainly true if   or   so henceforth assume that   and   Put   and   Because the logarithm function is concave,

 
with the equality holding if and only if   Young's inequality follows by exponentiating.

Young's inequality may equivalently be written as

 

Where this is just the concavity of the logarithm function. Equality holds if and only if   or   This also follows from the weighted AM-GM inequality.

Generalizations edit

Theorem[4] — Suppose   and   If   and   are such that   then

 

Using   and replacing   with   and   with   results in the inequality:

 
which is useful for proving Hölder's inequality.
Proof[4]

Define a real-valued function   on the positive real numbers by

 
for every   and then calculate its minimum.

Theorem — If   with   then

 
Equality holds if and only if all the  s with non-zero  s are equal.

Elementary case edit

An elementary case of Young's inequality is the inequality with exponent  

 
which also gives rise to the so-called Young's inequality with   (valid for every  ), sometimes called the Peter–Paul inequality. [5] This name refers to the fact that tighter control of the second term is achieved at the cost of losing some control of the first term – one must "rob Peter to pay Paul"
 

Proof: Young's inequality with exponent   is the special case   However, it has a more elementary proof.

Start by observing that the square of every real number is zero or positive. Therefore, for every pair of real numbers   and   we can write:

 
Work out the square of the right hand side:
 
Add   to both sides:
 
Divide both sides by 2 and we have Young's inequality with exponent  
 

Young's inequality with   follows by substituting   and   as below into Young's inequality with exponent  

 

Matricial generalization edit

T. Ando proved a generalization of Young's inequality for complex matrices ordered by Loewner ordering.[6] It states that for any pair   of complex matrices of order   there exists a unitary matrix   such that

 
where   denotes the conjugate transpose of the matrix and  

Standard version for increasing functions edit

 
The area of the rectangle a,b can't be larger than sum of the areas under the functions   (red) and   (yellow)

For the standard version[7][8] of the inequality, let   denote a real-valued, continuous and strictly increasing function on   with   and   Let   denote the inverse function of   Then, for all   and  

 
with equality if and only if  

With   and   this reduces to standard version for conjugate Hölder exponents.

For details and generalizations we refer to the paper of Mitroi & Niculescu.[9]

Generalization using Fenchel–Legendre transforms edit

By denoting the convex conjugate of a real function   by   we obtain

 
This follows immediately from the definition of the convex conjugate. For a convex function   this also follows from the Legendre transformation.

More generally, if   is defined on a real vector space   and its convex conjugate is denoted by   (and is defined on the dual space  ), then

 
where   is the dual pairing.

Examples edit

The convex conjugate of   is   with   such that   and thus Young's inequality for conjugate Hölder exponents mentioned above is a special case.

The Legendre transform of   is  , hence   for all non-negative   and   This estimate is useful in large deviations theory under exponential moment conditions, because   appears in the definition of relative entropy, which is the rate function in Sanov's theorem.

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ Young, W. H. (1912), "On classes of summable functions and their Fourier series", Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 87 (594): 225–229, Bibcode:1912RSPSA..87..225Y, doi:10.1098/rspa.1912.0076, JFM 43.1114.12, JSTOR 93236
  2. ^ Pearse, Erin. "Math 209D - Real Analysis Summer Preparatory Seminar Lecture Notes" (PDF). Retrieved 17 September 2022.
  3. ^ Bahouri, Chemin & Danchin 2011.
  4. ^ a b Jarchow 1981, pp. 47–55.
  5. ^ Tisdell, Chris (2013), The Peter Paul Inequality, YouTube video on Dr Chris Tisdell's YouTube channel,
  6. ^ T. Ando (1995). "Matrix Young Inequalities". In Huijsmans, C. B.; Kaashoek, M. A.; Luxemburg, W. A. J.; et al. (eds.). Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices. Springer. pp. 33–38. ISBN 978-3-0348-9076-2.
  7. ^ Hardy, G. H.; Littlewood, J. E.; Pólya, G. (1952) [1934], Inequalities, Cambridge Mathematical Library (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 0-521-05206-8, MR 0046395, Zbl 0047.05302, Chapter 4.8
  8. ^ Henstock, Ralph (1988), Lectures on the Theory of Integration, Series in Real Analysis Volume I, Singapore, New Jersey: World Scientific, ISBN 9971-5-0450-2, MR 0963249, Zbl 0668.28001, Theorem 2.9
  9. ^ Mitroi, F. C., & Niculescu, C. P. (2011). An extension of Young's inequality. In Abstract and Applied Analysis (Vol. 2011). Hindawi.

References edit

External links edit

young, inequality, products, mathematics, mathematical, inequality, about, product, numbers, inequality, named, after, william, henry, young, should, confused, with, young, convolution, inequality, used, prove, hölder, inequality, also, widely, used, estimate,. In mathematics Young s inequality for products is a mathematical inequality about the product of two numbers 1 The inequality is named after William Henry Young and should not be confused with Young s convolution inequality Young s inequality for products can be used to prove Holder s inequality It is also widely used to estimate the norm of nonlinear terms in PDE theory since it allows one to estimate a product of two terms by a sum of the same terms raised to a power and scaled Contents 1 Standard version for conjugate Holder exponents 1 1 Generalizations 2 Elementary case 3 Matricial generalization 4 Standard version for increasing functions 5 Generalization using Fenchel Legendre transforms 5 1 Examples 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External linksStandard version for conjugate Holder exponents editThe standard form of the inequality is the following Theorem If a 0 displaystyle a geq 0 nbsp and b 0 displaystyle b geq 0 nbsp are nonnegative real numbers and if p gt 1 displaystyle p gt 1 nbsp and q gt 1 displaystyle q gt 1 nbsp are real numbers such that 1 p 1 q 1 displaystyle frac 1 p frac 1 q 1 nbsp thena b a p p b q q displaystyle ab leq frac a p p frac b q q nbsp Equality holds if and only if a p b q displaystyle a p b q nbsp It can be used to prove Holder s inequality Proof 2 Since 1 p 1 q 1 displaystyle tfrac 1 p tfrac 1 q 1 nbsp p 1 1 q 1 displaystyle p 1 tfrac 1 q 1 nbsp A graph y x p 1 displaystyle y x p 1 nbsp on the x y displaystyle xy nbsp plane is thus also a graph x y q 1 displaystyle x y q 1 nbsp From sketching a visual representation of the integrals of the area between this curve and the axes and the area in the rectangle bounded by the lines x 0 x a y 0 y b displaystyle x 0 x a y 0 y b nbsp and the fact that y displaystyle y nbsp is always increasing for increasing x displaystyle x nbsp and vice versa we can see that 0 a x p 1 d x displaystyle int 0 a x p 1 mathrm d x nbsp upper bounds the area of the rectangle below the curve with equality when b a p 1 displaystyle b geq a p 1 nbsp and 0 b y q 1 d y displaystyle int 0 b y q 1 mathrm d y nbsp upper bounds the area of the rectangle above the curve with equality when b a p 1 displaystyle b leq a p 1 nbsp Thus 0 a x p 1 d x 0 b y q 1 d y a b displaystyle int 0 a x p 1 mathrm d x int 0 b y q 1 mathrm d y geq ab nbsp with equality when b a p 1 displaystyle b a p 1 nbsp or equivalently a p b q displaystyle a p b q nbsp Young s inequality follows from evaluating the integrals See below for a generalization This form of Young s inequality can also be proved via Jensen s inequality Proof 3 The claim is certainly true if a 0 displaystyle a 0 nbsp or b 0 displaystyle b 0 nbsp so henceforth assume that a gt 0 displaystyle a gt 0 nbsp and b gt 0 displaystyle b gt 0 nbsp Put t 1 p displaystyle t 1 p nbsp and 1 t 1 q displaystyle 1 t 1 q nbsp Because the logarithm function is concave ln t a p 1 t b q t ln a p 1 t ln b q ln a ln b ln a b displaystyle ln left ta p 1 t b q right geq t ln left a p right 1 t ln left b q right ln a ln b ln ab nbsp with the equality holding if and only if a p b q displaystyle a p b q nbsp Young s inequality follows by exponentiating Young s inequality may equivalently be written asa a b b a a b b 0 a b 1 a b 1 displaystyle a alpha b beta leq alpha a beta b qquad 0 leq alpha beta leq 1 quad alpha beta 1 nbsp Where this is just the concavity of the logarithm function Equality holds if and only if a b displaystyle a b nbsp or a b 0 1 displaystyle alpha beta 0 1 nbsp This also follows from the weighted AM GM inequality Generalizations edit Theorem 4 Suppose a gt 0 displaystyle a gt 0 nbsp and b gt 0 displaystyle b gt 0 nbsp If 1 lt p lt displaystyle 1 lt p lt infty nbsp and q displaystyle q nbsp are such that 1 p 1 q 1 displaystyle tfrac 1 p tfrac 1 q 1 nbsp thena b min 0 lt t lt t p a p p t q b q q displaystyle ab min 0 lt t lt infty left frac t p a p p frac t q b q q right nbsp Using t 1 displaystyle t 1 nbsp and replacing a displaystyle a nbsp with a 1 p displaystyle a 1 p nbsp and b displaystyle b nbsp with b 1 q displaystyle b 1 q nbsp results in the inequality a 1 p b 1 q a p b q displaystyle a 1 p b 1 q leq frac a p frac b q nbsp which is useful for proving Holder s inequality Proof 4 Define a real valued function f displaystyle f nbsp on the positive real numbers byf t t p a p p t q b q q displaystyle f t frac t p a p p frac t q b q q nbsp for every t gt 0 displaystyle t gt 0 nbsp and then calculate its minimum Theorem If 0 p i 1 displaystyle 0 leq p i leq 1 nbsp with i p i 1 displaystyle sum i p i 1 nbsp then i a i p i i p i a i displaystyle prod i a i p i leq sum i p i a i nbsp Equality holds if and only if all the a i displaystyle a i nbsp s with non zero p i displaystyle p i nbsp s are equal Elementary case editAn elementary case of Young s inequality is the inequality with exponent 2 displaystyle 2 nbsp a b a 2 2 b 2 2 displaystyle ab leq frac a 2 2 frac b 2 2 nbsp which also gives rise to the so called Young s inequality with e displaystyle varepsilon nbsp valid for every e gt 0 displaystyle varepsilon gt 0 nbsp sometimes called the Peter Paul inequality 5 This name refers to the fact that tighter control of the second term is achieved at the cost of losing some control of the first term one must rob Peter to pay Paul a b a 2 2 e e b 2 2 displaystyle ab leq frac a 2 2 varepsilon frac varepsilon b 2 2 nbsp Proof Young s inequality with exponent 2 displaystyle 2 nbsp is the special case p q 2 displaystyle p q 2 nbsp However it has a more elementary proof Start by observing that the square of every real number is zero or positive Therefore for every pair of real numbers a displaystyle a nbsp and b displaystyle b nbsp we can write 0 a b 2 displaystyle 0 leq a b 2 nbsp Work out the square of the right hand side 0 a 2 2 a b b 2 displaystyle 0 leq a 2 2ab b 2 nbsp Add 2 a b displaystyle 2ab nbsp to both sides 2 a b a 2 b 2 displaystyle 2ab leq a 2 b 2 nbsp Divide both sides by 2 and we have Young s inequality with exponent 2 displaystyle 2 nbsp a b a 2 2 b 2 2 displaystyle ab leq frac a 2 2 frac b 2 2 nbsp Young s inequality with e displaystyle varepsilon nbsp follows by substituting a displaystyle a nbsp and b displaystyle b nbsp as below into Young s inequality with exponent 2 displaystyle 2 nbsp a a e b e b displaystyle a a sqrt varepsilon b sqrt varepsilon b nbsp Matricial generalization editT Ando proved a generalization of Young s inequality for complex matrices ordered by Loewner ordering 6 It states that for any pair A B displaystyle A B nbsp of complex matrices of order n displaystyle n nbsp there exists a unitary matrix U displaystyle U nbsp such thatU A B U 1 p A p 1 q B q displaystyle U AB U preceq tfrac 1 p A p tfrac 1 q B q nbsp where displaystyle nbsp denotes the conjugate transpose of the matrix and A A A displaystyle A sqrt A A nbsp Standard version for increasing functions edit nbsp The area of the rectangle a b can t be larger than sum of the areas under the functions f displaystyle f nbsp red and f 1 displaystyle f 1 nbsp yellow For the standard version 7 8 of the inequality let f displaystyle f nbsp denote a real valued continuous and strictly increasing function on 0 c displaystyle 0 c nbsp with c gt 0 displaystyle c gt 0 nbsp and f 0 0 displaystyle f 0 0 nbsp Let f 1 displaystyle f 1 nbsp denote the inverse function of f displaystyle f nbsp Then for all a 0 c displaystyle a in 0 c nbsp and b 0 f c displaystyle b in 0 f c nbsp a b 0 a f x d x 0 b f 1 x d x displaystyle ab leq int 0 a f x dx int 0 b f 1 x dx nbsp with equality if and only if b f a displaystyle b f a nbsp With f x x p 1 displaystyle f x x p 1 nbsp and f 1 y y q 1 displaystyle f 1 y y q 1 nbsp this reduces to standard version for conjugate Holder exponents For details and generalizations we refer to the paper of Mitroi amp Niculescu 9 Generalization using Fenchel Legendre transforms editBy denoting the convex conjugate of a real function f displaystyle f nbsp by g displaystyle g nbsp we obtaina b f a g b displaystyle ab leq f a g b nbsp This follows immediately from the definition of the convex conjugate For a convex function f displaystyle f nbsp this also follows from the Legendre transformation More generally if f displaystyle f nbsp is defined on a real vector space X displaystyle X nbsp and its convex conjugate is denoted by f displaystyle f star nbsp and is defined on the dual space X displaystyle X star nbsp then u v f u f v displaystyle langle u v rangle leq f star u f v nbsp where X X R displaystyle langle cdot cdot rangle X star times X to mathbb R nbsp is the dual pairing Examples edit The convex conjugate of f a a p p displaystyle f a a p p nbsp is g b b q q displaystyle g b b q q nbsp with q displaystyle q nbsp such that 1 p 1 q 1 displaystyle tfrac 1 p tfrac 1 q 1 nbsp and thus Young s inequality for conjugate Holder exponents mentioned above is a special case The Legendre transform of f a e a 1 displaystyle f a e a 1 nbsp is g b 1 b b ln b displaystyle g b 1 b b ln b nbsp hence a b e a b b ln b displaystyle ab leq e a b b ln b nbsp for all non negative a displaystyle a nbsp and b displaystyle b nbsp This estimate is useful in large deviations theory under exponential moment conditions because b ln b displaystyle b ln b nbsp appears in the definition of relative entropy which is the rate function in Sanov s theorem See also editConvex conjugate Generalization of the Legendre transformation Integral of inverse functions Mathematical theorem used in calculus Legendre transformation Mathematical transformation Young s convolution inequalityNotes edit Young W H 1912 On classes of summable functions and their Fourier series Proceedings of the Royal Society A 87 594 225 229 Bibcode 1912RSPSA 87 225Y doi 10 1098 rspa 1912 0076 JFM 43 1114 12 JSTOR 93236 Pearse Erin Math 209D Real Analysis Summer Preparatory Seminar Lecture Notes PDF Retrieved 17 September 2022 Bahouri Chemin amp Danchin 2011 a b Jarchow 1981 pp 47 55 Tisdell Chris 2013 The Peter Paul Inequality YouTube video on Dr Chris Tisdell s YouTube channel T Ando 1995 Matrix Young Inequalities In Huijsmans C B Kaashoek M A Luxemburg W A J et al eds Operator Theory in Function Spaces and Banach Lattices Springer pp 33 38 ISBN 978 3 0348 9076 2 Hardy G H Littlewood J E Polya G 1952 1934 Inequalities Cambridge Mathematical Library 2nd ed Cambridge Cambridge University Press ISBN 0 521 05206 8 MR 0046395 Zbl 0047 05302 Chapter 4 8 Henstock Ralph 1988 Lectures on the Theory of Integration Series in Real Analysis Volume I Singapore New Jersey World Scientific ISBN 9971 5 0450 2 MR 0963249 Zbl 0668 28001 Theorem 2 9 Mitroi F C amp Niculescu C P 2011 An extension of Young s inequality In Abstract and Applied Analysis Vol 2011 Hindawi References editJarchow Hans 1981 Locally convex spaces Stuttgart B G Teubner ISBN 978 3 519 02224 4 OCLC 8210342 Bahouri Hajer Chemin Jean Yves Danchin Raphael 2011 Fourier Analysis and Nonlinear Partial Differential Equations Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften Vol 343 Berlin Heidelberg Springer ISBN 978 3 642 16830 7 OCLC 704397128 External links editYoung s Inequality at PlanetMath Weisstein Eric W Young s Inequality MathWorld Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Young 27s inequality for products amp oldid 1179336252, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.