Greenhouse gas emissions from wetlands

See also: Marsh gas

Greenhouse gas emissions from wetlands of concern consist primarily of methane and nitrous oxide emissions. Wetlands are the largest natural source of atmospheric methane in the world, and are therefore a major area of concern with respect to climate change.^[1][2][3] Wetlands account for approximately 20 - 30% of atmospheric methane through emissions from soils and plants, and contribute an approximate average of 161 Tg of methane to the atmosphere per year.^[4]

Methane emissions from wetlands.webm

Wetlands are characterized by water-logged soils and distinctive communities of plant and animal species that have adapted to the constant presence of water. This high level of water saturation creates conditions conducive to methane production. Most methanogenesis, or methane production, occurs in oxygen-poor environments. Because the microbes that live in warm, moist environments consume oxygen more rapidly than it can diffuse in from the atmosphere, wetlands are the ideal anaerobic environments for fermentation as well as methanogen activity. However, levels of methanogenesis fluctuates due to the availability of oxygen, soil temperature, and the composition of the soil. A warmer, more anaerobic environment with soil rich in organic matter would allow for more efficient methanogenesis.^[5]

Some wetlands are a significant source of methane emissions^[6][7] and some are also emitters of nitrous oxide.^[8][9] Nitrous oxide is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 300 times that of carbon dioxide and is the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century.^[10] Wetlands can also act as a sink for greenhouse gases.^[11]

Emissions by type of wetland

Main article: Wetland § Types

Characteristics of wetland classes can assist to inform on magnitude of methane emissions. However, wetland classes have displayed high variability in methane emissions spatially and temporally.^[12]Wetlands are often classified by landscape position, vegetation, and hydrologic regime.^[13] Wetland classes include marshes, swamps, bogs, fens, peatlands, muskegs, prairie pothole (landform),^[14] and pocosins.

Amounts

Depending on their characteristics, some wetlands are a significant source of methane emissions^[7] and some are also emitters of nitrous oxide.^[8][9]

Methane

A heat map of the planet showing methane emissions from wetlands from 1980 to 2021.

Wetlands account for approximately 20 - 30% of atmospheric methane through emissions from soils and plants.^[15]

Nitrous oxide fluxes

Nitrous oxide is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential 300 times that of carbon dioxide and is the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century.^[10] Excess nutrients mainly from anthropogenic sources have been shown to significantly increase the N₂O fluxes from wetland soils through denitrification and nitrification processes (see table below).^[16][8][17] A study in the intertidal region of a New England salt marsh showed that excess levels of nutrients might increase N₂O emissions rather than sequester them.^[16]

Data on nitrous oxide fluxes from wetlands in the southern hemisphere are lacking, as are ecosystem-based studies including the role of dominant organisms that alter sediment biogeochemistry. Aquatic invertebrates produce ecologically-relevant nitrous oxide emissions due to ingestion of denitrifying bacteria that live within the subtidal sediment and water column^[18] and thus may also be influencing nitrous oxide production within some wetlands.

Nitrous oxide fluxes from different wetland soils (table adapted from Moseman-Valtierra (2012)^[19] and Chen et al. (2010)^[20])

Wetland type	Location	N2O flux^a (µmol N2O m^−2 h^−1)	Reference
Mangrove	Shenzhen and Hong Kong	0.14 to 23.83	^[20]
Mangrove	Muthupet, South India	0.41 to 0.77	^[21]
Mangrove	Bhitarkanika, East India	0.20 to 4.73	^[22]
Mangrove	Pichavaram, South India	0.89 to 1.89	^[22]
Mangrove	Queensland, Australia	−0.045 to 0.32	^[23]
Mangrove	South East Queensland, Australia	0.091 to 1.48	^[24]
Mangrove	Southwest coast, Puerto Rico	0.12 to 7.8	^[25]
Mangrove	Isla Magueyes, Puerto Rico	0.05 to 1.4	^[25]
Salt marsh	Chesapeake Bay, US	0.005 to 0.12	^[26]
Salt marsh	Maryland, US	0.1	^[27]
Salt marsh	North East China	0.1 to 0.16	^[28]
Salt marsh	Biebrza, Poland	−0.07 to 0.06	^[29]
Salt marsh	Netherlands	0.82 to 1.64	^[30]
Salt marsh	Baltic Sea	−0.13	^[31]
Salt marsh	Massachusetts, US	−2.14 to 1.27	^[32]

^aThe flux rates are shown as hourly rates per unit area. A positive flux implies flux from soil into air; a negative flux implies flux from air into the soil.^[33] Negative N₂O fluxes are common and are caused by consumption by the soil.^[34]

Pathways of methane emission

Wetlands counteract the sinking action that normally occurs with soil because of the high water table. The level of the water table represents the boundary between anaerobic methane production and aerobic methane consumption. When the water table is low, the methane generated within the wetland soil has to come up through the soil and get past a deeper layer of methanotrophic bacteria, thereby reducing emission. Methane transport by vascular plants can bypass this aerobic layer, thus increasing emission.^[35][36]

Once produced, methane can reach the atmosphere via three main pathways: molecular diffusion, transport through plant aerenchyma, and ebullition. Primary productivity fuels methane emissions both directly and indirectly because plants not only provide much of the carbon needed for methane producing processes in wetlands but can affect its transport as well.^{[citation needed]}

Fermentation

Fermentation is a process used by certain kinds of microorganisms to break down essential nutrients. In a process called acetoclastic methanogenesis, microorganisms from the classification domain archaea produce methane by fermenting acetate and H₂-CO₂ into methane and carbon dioxide.

H₃C-COOH → CH₄ + CO₂

Depending on the wetland and type of archaea, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis, another process that yields methane, can also occur. This process occurs as a result of archaea oxidizing hydrogen with carbon dioxide to yield methane and water.

4H₂ + CO₂ → CH₄ + 2H₂O

Diffusion

Diffusion through the profile refers to the movement of methane up through soil and bodies of water to reach the atmosphere. The importance of diffusion as a pathway varies per wetland based on the type of soil and vegetation.^[37] For example, in peatlands, the mass amount of dead, but not decaying, organic matter results in relatively slow diffusion of methane through the soil.^[38] Additionally, because methane can travel more quickly through soil than water, diffusion plays a much bigger role in wetlands with drier, more loosely compacted soil.

Aerenchyma

 

Plant-mediated methane flux through plant aerenchyma, shown here, can contribute 30-100% of the total methane flux from wetlands with emergent vegetation.^[39]

Plant aerenchyma refers to the vessel-like transport tubes within the tissues of certain kinds of plants. Plants with aerenchyma possess porous tissue that allows for direct travel of gases to and from the plant roots. Methane can travel directly up from the soil into the atmosphere using this transport system.^[38] The direct "shunt" created by the aerenchyma allows for methane to bypass oxidation by oxygen that is also transported by the plants to their roots.

Ebullition

Ebullition refers to the sudden release of bubbles of methane into the air. These bubbles occur as a result of methane building up over time in the soil, forming pockets of methane gas. As these pockets of trapped methane grow in size, the level of the soil will slowly rise up as well. This phenomenon continues until so much pressure builds up that the bubble "pops," transporting the methane up through the soil so quickly that it does not have time to be consumed by the methanotrophic organisms in the soil. With this release of gas, the level of soil then falls once more.

Ebullition in wetlands can be recorded by delicate sensors, called piezometers, that can detect the presence of pressure pockets within the soil. Hydraulic heads are also used to detect the subtle rising and falling of the soil as a result of pressure build up and release. Using piezometers and hydraulic heads, a study was done in northern United States peatlands to determine the significance of ebullition as a source of methane. Not only was it determined that ebullition is in fact a significant source of methane emissions in northern United States peatlands, but it was also observed that there was an increase in pressure after significant rainfall, suggesting that rainfall is directly related to methane emissions in wetlands.^[40]

Controlling factors

The magnitude of methane emission from a wetland are usually measured using eddy covariance, gradient or chamber flux techniques, and depends upon several factors, including water table, comparative ratios of methanogenic bacteria to methanotrophic bacteria, transport mechanisms, temperature, substrate type, plant life, and climate. These factors work together to effect and control methane flux in wetlands.

Overall the main determinant of net flux of methane into the atmosphere is the ratio of methane produced by methanogenic bacteria that makes it to the surface relative to the amount of methane that is oxidized by methanotrophic bacteria before reaching the atmosphere.^[12] This ratio is in turn affected by the other controlling factors of methane in the environment. Additionally, pathways of methane emission affect how the methane travels into the atmosphere and thus have an equal effect on methane flux in wetlands.

Water table

The first controlling factor to consider is the level of the water table. Not only does pool and water table location determine the areas where methane production or oxidation may take place, but it also determines how quickly methane can diffuse into the air. When traveling through water, the methane molecules run into the quickly moving water molecules and thus take a longer time to reach the surface. Travel through soil, however, is much easier and results in easier diffusion into the atmosphere. This theory of movement is supported by observations made in wetlands where significant fluxes of methane occurred after a drop in the water table due to drought.^[12] If the water table is at or above the surface, then methane transport begins to take place primarily through ebullition and vascular or pressurized plant mediated transport, with high levels of emission occurring during the day from plants that use pressurized ventilation.^[12]

Temperature

Temperature is also an important factor to consider as the environmental temperature—and temperature of the soil in particular—affects the metabolic rate of production or consumption by bacteria. Additionally, because methane fluxes occur annually with the seasons, evidence is provided that suggests that the temperature changing coupled with water table level work together to cause and control the seasonal cycles.^[41]

Substrate composition

The composition of soil and substrate availability change the nutrients available for methanogenic and methanotrophic bacteria, and thus directly affects the rate of methane production and consumption. For example, wetlands soils with high levels of acetate or hydrogen and carbon dioxide are conducive to methane production. Additionally, the type of plant life and amount of plant decomposition affects the nutrients available to the bacteria as well as the acidity. Plant leachates such as phenolic compounds from Sphagnum can also interact with soil characteristics to influence methane production and consumption.^[42] A constant availability of cellulose and a soil pH of about 6.0 have been determined to provide optimum conditions for methane production and consumption; however, substrate quality can be overridden by other factors.^[12] Soil pH and composition must still be compared to the effects of water table and temperature.

Net ecosystem production

Net ecosystem production (NEP) and climate changes are the all encompassing factors that have been shown to have a direct relationship with methane emissions from wetlands. In wetlands with high water tables, NEP has been shown to increase and decrease with methane emissions, most likely due to the fact that both NEP and methane emissions flux with substrate availability and soil composition. In wetlands with lower water tables, the movement of oxygen in and out of the soil can increase the oxidation of methane and the inhibition of methanogenesis, nulling the relationship between methane emission and NEP because methane production becomes dependent upon factors deep within the soil.

A changing climate affects many factors within the ecosystem, including water table, temperature, and plant composition within the wetland—all factors that affect methane emissions. However, climate change can also affect the amount of carbon dioxide in the surrounding atmosphere, which would in turn decrease the addition of methane into the atmosphere, as shown by an 80% decrease in methane flux in areas of doubled carbon dioxide levels.^[12]

Causes for additional emissions

Human development of wetlands

Humans often drain wetlands in the name of development, housing, and agriculture. By draining wetlands, the water table is thus lowered, increasing consumption of methane by the methanotrophic bacteria in the soil.^[12] However, as a result of draining, water saturated ditches develop, which due to the warm, moist environment, end up emitting a large amount of methane.^[12] Therefore, the actual effect on methane emission strongly ends up depending on several factors. If the drains are not spaced far enough apart, then saturated ditches will form, creating mini wetland environments. Additionally, if the water table is lowered significantly enough, then the wetland can actually be transformed from a source of methane into a sink that consumes methane. Finally, the actual composition of the original wetland changes how the surrounding environment is affected by the draining and human development.^{[citation needed]}

References

1. Houghton, J. T., et al. (Eds.) (2001) Projections of future climate change, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 881 pp.
2. Comyn-Platt, Edward (2018). "Carbon budgets for 1.5 and 2 °C targets lowered by natural wetland and permafrost feedbacks" (PDF). Nature. 11 (8): 568–573. Bibcode:2018NatGe..11..568C. doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0174-9. S2CID 134078252.
3. Bridgham, Scott D.; Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby; Keller, Jason K.; Zhuang, Qianlai (May 2013). "Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales". Global Change Biology. 19 (5): 1325–1346. Bibcode:2013GCBio..19.1325B. doi:10.1111/gcb.12131. PMID 23505021. S2CID 14228726.
4. Saunois, Marielle; Stavert, Ann R.; Poulter, Ben; Bousquet, Philippe; Canadell, Josep G.; Jackson, Robert B.; Raymond, Peter A.; Dlugokencky, Edward J.; Houweling, Sander; Patra, Prabir K.; Ciais, Philippe; Arora, Vivek K.; Bastviken, David; Bergamaschi, Peter; Blake, Donald R. (2020-07-15). "The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017". Earth System Science Data. 12 (3): 1561–1623. doi:10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020. ISSN 1866-3508.
5. Christensen, T. R., A. Ekberg, L. Strom, M. Mastepanov, N. Panikov, M. Oquist, B. H. Svenson, H. Nykanen, P. J. Martikainen, and H. Oskarsson (2003), Factors controlling large scale variations in methane emissions from wetlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1414, doi:10.1029/2002GL016848.
6. Masso, Luana S.; Marani, Luciano; Gatti, Luciana V.; Miller, John B.; Gloor, Manuel; Melack, John; Cassol, Henrique L. G.; Tejada, Graciela; Domingues, Lucas G.; Arai, Egidio; Sanchez, Alber H.; Corrêa, Sergio M.; Anderson, Liana; Aragão, Luiz E. O. C.; Correa, Caio S. C.; Crispim, Stephane P.; Neves, Raiane A. L. (29 November 2021). "Amazon methane budget derived from multi-year airborne observations highlights regional variations in emissions". Communications Earth & Environment. 2 (1): 246. Bibcode:2021ComEE...2..246B. doi:10.1038/s43247-021-00314-4. S2CID 244711959.
7. Tiwari, Shashank; Singh, Chhatarpal; Singh, Jay Shankar (2020). "Wetlands: A Major Natural Source Responsible for Methane Emission". In Upadhyay, Atul Kumar; Singh, Ranjan; Singh, D. P. (eds.). Restoration of Wetland Ecosystem: A Trajectory Towards a Sustainable Environment. Singapore: Springer. pp. 59–74. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-7665-8_5. ISBN 978-981-13-7665-8. S2CID 198421761.
8. Bange, Hermann W. (2006). "Nitrous oxide and methane in European coastal waters". Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 70 (3): 361–374. Bibcode:2006ECSS...70..361B. doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.042.
9. Thompson, A. J.; Giannopoulos, G.; Pretty, J.; Baggs, E. M.; Richardson, D. J. (2012). "Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 367 (1593): 1157–1168. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0415. PMC 3306631. PMID 22451101.
10. Ravishankara, A. R.; Daniel, John S.; Portmann, Robert W. (2009). "Nitrous Oxide (N₂O): The Dominant Ozone-Depleting Substance Emitted in the 21st Century". Science. 326 (5949): 123–125. Bibcode:2009Sci...326..123R. doi:10.1126/science.1176985. PMID 19713491. S2CID 2100618.
11. Sonwani, Saurabh; Saxena, Pallavi (2022-01-21). Greenhouse Gases: Sources, Sinks and Mitigation. Springer Nature. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-981-16-4482-5.
12. Bubier, Jill L. and Moore, Tim R. (1994). "An ecological perspective on methane emissions from northern wetlands." Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 9 (12): 460-464. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90309-3.
13. US EPA, OW (2015-04-09). "Classification and Types of Wetlands". US EPA. Retrieved 2021-05-15.
14. Tangen BA, Finocchiaro RG, Gleason RA (2015). "Effects of land use on greenhouse gas fluxes and soil properties of wetland catchments in the Prairie Pothole Region of North America". Science of the Total Environment. 533: 391–409. Bibcode:2015ScTEn.533..391T. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.148. PMID 26172606.
15. Saunois, Marielle; Stavert, Ann R.; Poulter, Ben; Bousquet, Philippe; Canadell, Joseph G.; Jackson, Robert B.; Raymond, Peter A.; Dlugokencky, Edward J.; Houweling, Sander (2019-08-19). "The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017". doi:10.5194/essd-2019-128. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
16. Moseman-Valtierra, S.; et al. (2011). "Short-term nitrogen additions can shift a coastal wetland from a sink to a source of N₂O". Atmospheric Environment. 45 (26): 4390–4397. Bibcode:2011AtmEn..45.4390M. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.046.
17. Martin, Rose M.; Wigand, Cathleen; Elmstrom, Elizabeth; Lloret, Javier; Valiela, Ivan (20 April 2018). "Long-term nutrient addition increases respiration and nitrous oxide emissions in a New England salt marsh". Ecology and Evolution. 8 (10): 4958–4966. doi:10.1002/ece3.3955. ISSN 2045-7758. PMC 5980632. PMID 29876073.
18. Stief, P.; Poulsen, M.; Nielsen; et al. (2009). "Nitrous oxide emission by aquatic macrofauna". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (11): 4296–4300. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.4296S. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808228106. PMC 2651200. PMID 19255427.
19. Moseman-Valtierra, S. (2012). "Chapter 1: Reconsidering the climatic roles of marshes: Are they sinks or sources of greenhouse gases?". In Abreu, D. C.; Borbón, S. L. (eds.). Marshes: Ecology, Management and Conservation. New York, NY: Nova Science.
20. Chen, G.; Tam, N.; Ye, Y. (2010). "Summer fluxes of atmospheric greenhouse gases N₂O, CH₄ and CO₂ from mangrove soil in South China". Science of the Total Environment. 408 (13): 2761–2767. Bibcode:2010ScTEn.408.2761C. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.03.007. PMID 20381125.
21. Krithika, K.; Purvaja, R.; Ramesh, R. (2008). "Fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide from an Indian mangrove". Current Science. 94: 218–224.
22. Chauhan, R.; Ramanathan, A. L.; Adhya, T. K. (2008). "Assessment of methane and nitrous oxide flux from mangroves along Eastern coast of India". Geofluids. 8 (4): 321–332. doi:10.1111/j.1468-8123.2008.00227.x.
23. Kreuzwieser, J.; Buchholz, J.; Rennenberg, H. (2003). "Emission of methane and nitrous oxide by Australian mangrove ecosystems". Plant Biology. 5 (4): 423–431. doi:10.1055/s-2003-42712.
24. Allen, D. E.; Dalal, R. C.; Rennenberg, L.; Meyer, R.; Reeves, S.; Schmidt, S. (2007). "Spatial and temporal variation of nitrous oxide and methane flux between subtropical mangrove soils and the atmosphere". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 39 (2): 622–631. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.09.013.
25. Sotomayor, D.; Corredor, J. E.; Morell, J. M. (1994). "Methane flux from mangrove soils along the southwestern coast of Puerto Rico". Estuaries. 17 (1): 140–147. doi:10.2307/1352563. JSTOR 1352563. S2CID 86450737.
26. Jordan, T. E.; Andrews, M. P.; Szuch, R. P.; Whigham, D. F.; Weller, D. E.; Jacobs, A. D. (2007). "Comparing Functional Assessments Of Wetlands To Measurements Of Soil Characteristics And Nitrogen Processing" (PDF). Wetlands (Submitted manuscript). 27 (3): 479–497. doi:10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[479:cfaowt]2.0.co;2. S2CID 9109080.
27. Weller, D. E.; Cornell, D. L.; Jordan, T. E. (1994). "Denitrification in riparian forests receiving agricultural discharges". Global Wetlands: Old World and New: 117–131.
28. Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, W.; Patrick, W. H.; Meixner, F. X. (2007). "Nitrous Oxide Emission from Deyeuxia angustifolia Freshwater Marsh in Northeast China". Environmental Management. 40 (4): 613–622. Bibcode:2007EnMan..40..613Y. doi:10.1007/s00267-006-0349-9. PMID 17661130. S2CID 16763038.
29. Roobroeck, D.; Butterbach-Bahl, K.; Brüggemann, N.; Boeckx, P. (2010). "Dinitrogen and nitrous oxide exchanges from an undrained monolith fen: Short-term responses following nitrate addition". European Journal of Soil Science. 61 (5): 662–670. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01269.x. S2CID 94635551.
30. Hefting, M. M.; Bobbink, R.; De Caluwe, H. (2003). "Nitrous Oxide Emission and Denitrification in Chronically Nitrate-Loaded Riparian Buffer Zones". Journal of Environmental Quality. 32 (4): 1194–203. doi:10.2134/jeq2003.1194. PMID 12931872.
31. Liikanen, A. (2009). "Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes in two coastal wetlands in the northeastern Gulf of Bothnia, Baltic Sea". Boreal Environment Research. 14 (3): 351–368.
32. Moseman-Valtierra, S.; et al. (2011). "Short-term nitrogen additions can shift a coastal wetland from a sink to a source of N₂O". Atmospheric Environment. 45 (26): 4390–4397. Bibcode:2011AtmEn..45.4390M. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.046.
33. Agricultural & Environmental Data Archive
34. Audet, Joachim; Hoffmann, Carl C.; Andersen, Peter M.; Baattrup-Pedersen, Annette; Johansen, Jan R.; Larsen, Søren E.; Kjaergaard, Charlotte; Elsgaard, Lars (2014-01-01). "Nitrous oxide fluxes in undisturbed riparian wetlands located in agricultural catchments: Emission, uptake and controlling factors". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 68: 291–299. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.011. ISSN 0038-0717.
35. Macdonald, J. A.; et al. (1998). "Methane emission rates from a northern wetland; response to temperature, water table and transport". Atmospheric Environment. 32 (19): 3219–3227. Bibcode:1998AtmEn..32.3219M. doi:10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00464-0.
36. Gedney, N.; et al. (October 2004). "Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions". Geophysical Research Letters. 31 (20): L20503. Bibcode:2004GeoRL..3120503G. doi:10.1029/2004GL020919. L20503.
37. Tang J, Zhuang Q, White JR, Shannon RD (2008). "Assessing the role of different wetland methane emission pathways with a biogeochemistry model". AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2008: B33B–0424. Bibcode:2008AGUFM.B33B0424T.
38. Couwenberg, John. Greifswald University. "Methane emissions from peat soils." http://www.imcg.net/media/download_gallery/climate/couwenberg_2009b.pdf
39. Bridgham, Scott D.; Cadillo-Quiroz, Hinsby; Keller, Jason K.; Zhuang, Qianlai (2013-02-11). "Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales". Global Change Biology. 19 (5): 1325–1346. Bibcode:2013GCBio..19.1325B. doi:10.1111/gcb.12131. ISSN 1354-1013. PMID 23505021. S2CID 14228726.
40. Glaser, P.H., J.P. Chanton, P. Morin, D.O. Rosenberry, D.I. Siegel, O. Ruud, L.I. Chasar, A.S. Reeve. 2004. "Surface deformations as indicators of deep ebullition fluxes in a large northern peatland."
41. Turetsky, Merritt R.; Kotowska, Agnieszka; Bubier, Jill; Dise, Nancy B.; Crill, Patrick; Hornibrook, Ed R. C.; Minkkinen, Kari; Moore, Tim R.; Myers-Smith, Isla H. (2014-04-28). "A synthesis of methane emissions from 71 northern, temperate, and subtropical wetlands". Global Change Biology. 20 (7): 2183–2197. Bibcode:2014GCBio..20.2183T. doi:10.1111/gcb.12580. ISSN 1354-1013. PMID 24777536. S2CID 9305759.
42. Medvedeff, Cassandra A.; Bridgham, Scott D.; Pfeifer-Meister, Laurel; Keller, Jason K. (2015). "Can Sphagnum leachate chemistry explain differences in anaerobic decomposition in peatlands?". Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 86: 34–41. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.016. ISSN 0038-0717.