fbpx
Wikipedia

Single-elimination tournament

A single-elimination, knockout, or sudden death tournament is a type of elimination tournament where the loser of each match-up is immediately eliminated from the tournament. Each winner will play another in the next round, until the final match-up, whose winner becomes the tournament champion. Each match-up may be a single match or several, for example two-legged ties in European sports or best-of series in American pro sports. Defeated competitors may play no further part after losing, or may participate in "consolation" or "classification" matches against other losers to determine the lower final rankings; for example, a third place playoff between losing semi-finalists. In a shootout poker tournament, there are more than two players competing at each table, and sometimes more than one progressing to the next round. Some competitions are held with a pure single-elimination tournament system. Others have many phases, with the last being a single-elimination final stage, often called playoffs.

The tournament has been completed until the semifinals, the winner of Lisa-Ernie match and Andrew-Robert match will play in the final.

Nomenclature

In English, the round in which only eight competitors remain is generally called (with or without hyphenation) the quarter-final round; this is followed by the semi-final round, in which only four are left, the two winners of which then meet in the final or championship round.

The round before the quarterfinals has multiple designations. Often it is called the round of sixteen, last sixteen, or (in South Asia) pre-quarterfinals. In many other languages the term for these eight matches translates to eighth-final (e.g., in these eight European languages: "huitième de finale" in French, octavos de final in Spanish, Achtelfinale in German, ottavi di finale in Italian, oitavos-de-final in Portuguese, optimi de finală in Romanian osmifinále in Czech, osemfinále in Slovak, and osmina finala in Serbian), though this term is rare in English itself.

The round before the round of sixteen is sometimes called round of thirty-two in English. Terms for this in other languages generally translate as "sixteenth final".

Earlier rounds are typically numbered counting forwards from the first round, or by the number of remaining competitors. If some competitors get a bye, the round at which they enter may be named the first round, with the earlier matches called a preliminary round, qualifying round, opening round, or the play-in games.

Examples of the diverse names given to concurrent rounds in various select disciplines:

By competitors Fraction of final Grand Slam tennis[1] FA Cup football Coupe de France[2] NCAA Men's Basketball North American Debating Ch'ship Snooker
Round of 2 Final Final Final Final National Championship Final Final
Round of 4 Semifinals Semifinals Semi-finals Semifinals Final Four
(National semifinals)[t 1]
Semifinals Semi-finals
Round of 8 Quarterfinals Quarterfinals quarter-finals[t 2] Quarterfinals Elite Eight
(Regional finals)[t 3]
Quarterfinals Quarter-finals
Round of 16 Eighth-finals 4th round (Wimbledon[4])
Round of 16 (US Open[5])
5th round[t 4] 8th-finals Sweet Sixteen
(Regional semifinals)[t 5]
Round 7 Last 16
4th Round
Round of 32 16th-finals 3rd round 4th round[t 4] 16th-finals 3rd/2nd round[t 6][t 7] Round 6 Last 32
3rd Round
Round of 64 32nd-finals 2nd round 3rd round[t 4] 32nd-finals 2nd/1st round[t 6][t 7] Round 5 Last 64
2nd Round
Round of 128 64th-finals 1st round 2nd round[t 8][t 4] 8th qualifying round[t 9] First Four[t 6] Round 4[t 10] Last 128
1st Round

Notes:

  1. ^ The NCAA also uses the "Final Four" terminology in the Division I women's tournament, as well as the Division III tournaments for both men and women. In Division II for both sexes, this round is called the "semifinals"; both championship events in that division consist of eight teams instead of four.
  2. ^ The quarter-finals were called the "sixth round" until 2016–17, the first in which replays were discontinued for this round.[3]
  3. ^ In the Division II men's and women's tournaments, the Elite Eight is the championship event, with all qualifying teams participating at a single site. The NCAA does not use "Elite Eight" in Division III, simply calling this round the "regional finals".
  4. ^ a b c d The first to fifth rounds are often called the "first/second/etc. round proper", to distinguish them from the "first/second/etc. qualifying round".
  5. ^ The NCAA only uses the term "Sweet Sixteen" in the Division I tournaments.
  6. ^ a b c Starting in 2011, 68 teams played in the Championship, with four play-in games, nicknamed the First Four, before the top 60 teams enter at the round of 64. (From 2001 to 2010, there was a single "Opening Round" game before the round of 64.) The NCAA originally called the First Four the first round, making the rounds of 64 and 32 the second and third rounds respectively; in 2014 it announced that from 2016 it would revert to calling the rounds of 64 and 32 the first and second rounds.[6]
  7. ^ a b Since the NCAA Division I women's tournament expanded beyond 32 teams in 1986, the round of 32 has always been called the "second round", and the preceding round the "first round". The women's tournament involved 64 teams from 1994-2021 before expanding to 68 in 2022.
  8. ^ The FA Cup 2nd round involves 40 teams, of which 20 qualify for the 3rd round, to which the top 44 teams will have received byes.
  9. ^ The 8th qualifying round involves 88 teams, of which 44 qualify for the 32nd-finals, to which the top 20 teams will have received byes.
  10. ^ The number of eligible teams is typically less than 128, but more than 64, so not all teams play this round.

Example

The final three rounds of the 2002–03 UEFA Champions League tournament:


Quarter-finals Semi-finals Final
          
  Real Madrid 3 3 6
  Manchester United 1 4 5
  Real Madrid 2 1 3
  Juventus 1 3 4
  Juventus (aet) 1 2 3
  Barcelona 1 1 2
  Juventus 0 (2)
  Milan (p) 0 (3)
  Ajax 0 2 2
  Milan 0 3 3
  Milan (a) 0 1 1
  Internazionale 0 1 1
  Internazionale (a) 1 1 2
  Valencia 0 2 2

Quarter-finals

Semi-finals

Team 1 Agg. Team 2 1st leg 2nd leg
Real Madrid   3–4   Juventus 2–1 1–3
Milan   1–1 (a)   Internazionale 0–0 1–1*

*Both clubs played their home leg in the same stadium (the San Siro), but Milan were the designated away side in the second leg, and thus won on away goals.

Final

Attendance: 62,315
Referee: Markus Merk (Germany)

Classification

Without any additional matches, the only position a single-elimination tournament can reliably determine is first - for example, if sorting the numbers 1-4 ascending, if 4 and 3 meet in the first round, 3 and 1 will lose in the first round and 2 will lose in the second, selecting 4 as the largest number in the set, but insufficient comparisons have been performed to determine which is greater, 2 or 3. Despite this, the candidate that loses in the final round is commonly considered to have taken second place (in this case, 2). When matches are held to determine places or prizes lower than first and second, these typically include a match between the losers of the semifinal matches called third place playoffs, the winner therein placing third and the loser fourth. Many Olympic single-elimination tournaments feature the bronze medal match if they do not award bronze medals to both losing semifinalists. The FIFA World Cup has long featured the third place match (since 1934), though the UEFA Euro has not held one since the 1980 edition.

Sometimes, contests are also held among the losers of the quarterfinal matches to determine fifth to eighth places – this is most commonly encountered in the Olympic Games, with the exception of boxing, where both fighters are deemed to be third place. In one scenario, two "consolation semifinal" matches may be conducted, with the winners of these then facing off to determine fifth and sixth places and the losers playing for seventh and eighth; those are used often in qualifying tournaments where only the top five teams advance to the next round; or some method of ranking the four quarterfinal losers might be employed, in which case only one round of additional matches would be held among them, the two highest-ranked therein then playing for fifth and sixth places and the two lowest for seventh and eighth.

The number of distinct ways of arranging a single-elimination tournament (as an abstract structure, prior to seeding the players into the tournament) is given by the Wedderburn–Etherington numbers.[7] Thus, for instance, there are three different arrangements for five players:

  • The players may be divided into brackets of two and three players, the winners of which meet in the final game
  • The bottom four players may play a two-round tournament, the winner of which plays the top player
  • The bottom two players may meet, after which each subsequent game pairs the winner of the previous game with the next player

However, the number of arrangements grows quickly for larger numbers of players and not all of them are commonly used.

Seeding

Opponents may be allocated randomly (such as in the FA Cup); however, since the "luck of the draw" may result in the highest-rated competitors being scheduled to face each other early in the competition, seeding is often used to prevent this. Brackets are set up so that the top two seeds could not possibly meet until the final round (should both advance that far), none of the top four can meet prior to the semifinals, and so on. If no seeding is used, the tournament is called a random knockout tournament.

Standard seeding pairs the highest and lowest, then second highest and second lowest and so on, for an 8 seed tournament this is 1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6 and 4 v 5, for example this is used for 16 seeds in the World Snooker Championship and 32 seeds in the World Darts Championship. Some tournaments stray from this, for example is not the procedure that is followed in most tennis tournaments, where the 1 and 2 seeds are placed in separate brackets, but then the 3 and 4 seeds are assigned to their brackets randomly, and so too are seeds 5 through 8, and so on. This may result in some brackets consisting of stronger players than other brackets, and since only the top 32 players of 128 are seeded in Tennis Grand Slam tournaments, it is conceivable that the 33rd-best player in a 128-player field could end up playing the top seed in the first round. An example of this occurring was when World No. 33 Florian Mayer was drawn against (and eventually defeated by) then-World No. 1 Novak Djokovic in the first round of the 2013 Wimbledon Championships,[8] in what was also a rematch of a quarterfinal from the previous year.[9]

Sometimes the remaining competitors in a single-elimination tournament will be "re-seeded" so that the highest surviving seed is made to play the lowest surviving seed in the next round, the second-highest plays the second-lowest, etc. This may be done after each round, or only at selected intervals. In American team sports, for example, the NFL employs this tactic, but MLS, NHL and the NBA do not (and neither does the NCAA college basketball tournament). MLB does not have enough teams (12) in its playoff tournament where re-seeding would make a large difference in the matchups; only the WNBA's at the minimum, which is at least four from each conference for a total of 8. The NBA's format calls for the winner of the first-round series between the first and eighth seeds (within each of the two conferences the league has) to face the winner of the first-round series between the fourth and fifth seeds in the next round, even if one or more of the top three seeds had been upset in their first-round series; critics have claimed that this gives a team fighting for the fifth and sixth seeding positions near the end of the regular season an incentive to tank (deliberately lose) games, so as to finish sixth and thus avoid a possible match-up with the top seed until one round later. MLS' format is identical, except that the top-seed gets a first-round bye to play 4th-5th seed winner.

In some situations, a seeding restriction may be implemented; from 1975 until 1989 in the NFL, and from 1994 until 2011 in MLB there was a rule where at the conference or league semifinal, should the top seed and last seed (wild card) be from the same division, they cannot play each other; in that case, the top seed plays the worst division champion; the second-best division champion plays the wild card team. This is due to the scheduling employed for the regular season, in which a team faces any given divisional opponent more often than any given non-divisional opponent – the tournament favors match-ups that took place fewer times in the regular season (or did not take place, in some cases).[citation needed]

In international fencing competitions, it is common to have a group stage. Participants are divided in groups of 6–7 fencers who play a round-robin tournament, and a ranking is calculated from the consolidated group results. Single elimination is seeded from this ranking.

Evaluation

The single-elimination format enables a relatively large number of competitors to participate. There are no "dead" matches (perhaps excluding "classification" matches), and no matches where one competitor has more to play for than the other.

The format is less suited to games where draws are frequent. In chess, each fixture in a single-elimination tournament must be played over multiple matches, because draws are common, and because white has an advantage over black. In association football, games ending in a draw may be settled in extra time and eventually by a penalty shootout or by replaying the fixture.

Another perceived disadvantage is that most competitors are eliminated after relatively few games. Variations such as the double-elimination tournament allow competitors a single loss while remaining eligible for overall victory. However, losing one game requires the competitor to win more games in order to win the tournament.

In a random knockout tournament (single-elimination without any seeding), awarding the second place to the loser of the final is unjustified: any of the competitors knocked out by the tournament winner might have been the second strongest one, but they never got the chance to play against the losing finalist. In general, it is only fair to use a single-elimination tournament to determine first place. To fairly determine lower places requires some form of round-robin in which each player/team gets the opportunity to face every other player/team.

Also, if the competitors' performance is variable, that is, it depends on a small, varying factor in addition to the actual strength of the competitors, then not only will it become less likely that the strongest competitor actually wins the tournament, in addition the seeding done by the tournament organizers will play a major part in deciding the winner.[10][11] As a random factor is always present in a real-world competition, this might easily cause accusations of unfairness.

Other tournament systems

Variations of the single-elimination tournament include:

Other common tournament types include:

References

  1. ^ In singles only (the other disciplines have fewer rounds)
  2. ^ (in French). French Football Federation. Archived from the original on 19 July 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  3. ^ "Premier League clubs want the FA Cup moved to midweek and replays scrapped". talkSPORT. 31 May 2018 [2017]. Retrieved 31 March 2019.; Emirates FA Cup (17 February 2017). "We do now! The sixth round has been renamed as the quarter-finals from this season". @EmiratesFACup. Twitter. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
  4. ^ "Gentlemen's Singles – 2012 Official Site by IBM". Wimbledon Championships Website. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  5. ^ . US Open. Archived from the original on 17 July 2012. Retrieved 16 July 2012.
  6. ^ Cary, Tim (21 November 2014). "What's in a Name? March Madness First Round Is the 'First Round' Again". The Cheat Sheet. Retrieved 6 June 2015.
  7. ^ Maurer, Willi (1975), "On most effective tournament plans with fewer games than competitors", The Annals of Statistics, 3 (3): 717–727, doi:10.1214/aos/1176343135, JSTOR 2958441, MR 0371712.
  8. ^ Wimbledon: Novak vs Mayer in R1; Andy, Roger, Rafa all in bottom half, Novak Djokovic official website, 21 June 2013
  9. ^ Wimbledon 2013: Men's matches to watch out for, The Roar, 22 June 2013
  10. ^ Ryvkin, Dmitry (March 2005). "The Predictive Power of Noisy Elimination Tournaments" (PDF). CERGE-EI. (PDF) from the original on 22 October 2007. Retrieved 21 October 2010.
  11. ^ Kim, Michael P.; Suksompong, Warut; Vassilevska Williams, Virginia (2017). "Who Can Win a Single-Elimination Tournament?". SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics. 31 (3): 1751–1764. arXiv:1511.08416. doi:10.1137/16M1061783. hdl:1721.1/125608. S2CID 1251470.

single, elimination, tournament, knockout, tournament, redirects, here, other, uses, tournament, knockout, tournaments, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsou. Knockout tournament redirects here For other uses see Tournament Knockout tournaments This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Single elimination tournament news newspapers books scholar JSTOR May 2011 Learn how and when to remove this template message A single elimination knockout or sudden death tournament is a type of elimination tournament where the loser of each match up is immediately eliminated from the tournament Each winner will play another in the next round until the final match up whose winner becomes the tournament champion Each match up may be a single match or several for example two legged ties in European sports or best of series in American pro sports Defeated competitors may play no further part after losing or may participate in consolation or classification matches against other losers to determine the lower final rankings for example a third place playoff between losing semi finalists In a shootout poker tournament there are more than two players competing at each table and sometimes more than one progressing to the next round Some competitions are held with a pure single elimination tournament system Others have many phases with the last being a single elimination final stage often called playoffs The tournament has been completed until the semifinals the winner of Lisa Ernie match and Andrew Robert match will play in the final Contents 1 Nomenclature 2 Example 2 1 Quarter finals 2 2 Semi finals 2 3 Final 3 Classification 4 Seeding 5 Evaluation 6 Other tournament systems 7 ReferencesNomenclature Edit Final round redirects here For other uses see Final Round In English the round in which only eight competitors remain is generally called with or without hyphenation the quarter final round this is followed by the semi final round in which only four are left the two winners of which then meet in the final or championship round The round before the quarterfinals has multiple designations Often it is called the round of sixteen last sixteen or in South Asia pre quarterfinals In many other languages the term for these eight matches translates to eighth final e g in these eight European languages huitieme de finale in French octavos de final in Spanish Achtelfinale in German ottavi di finale in Italian oitavos de final in Portuguese optimi de finală in Romanian osmifinale in Czech osemfinale in Slovak and osmina finala in Serbian though this term is rare in English itself The round before the round of sixteen is sometimes called round of thirty two in English Terms for this in other languages generally translate as sixteenth final Earlier rounds are typically numbered counting forwards from the first round or by the number of remaining competitors If some competitors get a bye the round at which they enter may be named the first round with the earlier matches called a preliminary round qualifying round opening round or the play in games Examples of the diverse names given to concurrent rounds in various select disciplines By competitors Fraction of final Grand Slam tennis 1 FA Cup football Coupe de France 2 NCAA Men s Basketball North American Debating Ch ship SnookerRound of 2 Final Final Final Final National Championship Final FinalRound of 4 Semifinals Semifinals Semi finals Semifinals Final Four National semifinals t 1 Semifinals Semi finalsRound of 8 Quarterfinals Quarterfinals quarter finals t 2 Quarterfinals Elite Eight Regional finals t 3 Quarterfinals Quarter finalsRound of 16 Eighth finals 4th round Wimbledon 4 Round of 16 US Open 5 5th round t 4 8th finals Sweet Sixteen Regional semifinals t 5 Round 7 Last 164th RoundRound of 32 16th finals 3rd round 4th round t 4 16th finals 3rd 2nd round t 6 t 7 Round 6 Last 323rd RoundRound of 64 32nd finals 2nd round 3rd round t 4 32nd finals 2nd 1st round t 6 t 7 Round 5 Last 642nd RoundRound of 128 64th finals 1st round 2nd round t 8 t 4 8th qualifying round t 9 First Four t 6 Round 4 t 10 Last 1281st RoundNotes The NCAA also uses the Final Four terminology in the Division I women s tournament as well as the Division III tournaments for both men and women In Division II for both sexes this round is called the semifinals both championship events in that division consist of eight teams instead of four The quarter finals were called the sixth round until 2016 17 the first in which replays were discontinued for this round 3 In the Division II men s and women s tournaments the Elite Eight is the championship event with all qualifying teams participating at a single site The NCAA does not use Elite Eight in Division III simply calling this round the regional finals a b c d The first to fifth rounds are often called the first second etc round proper to distinguish them from the first second etc qualifying round The NCAA only uses the term Sweet Sixteen in the Division I tournaments a b c Starting in 2011 68 teams played in the Championship with four play in games nicknamed the First Four before the top 60 teams enter at the round of 64 From 2001 to 2010 there was a single Opening Round game before the round of 64 The NCAA originally called the First Four the first round making the rounds of 64 and 32 the second and third rounds respectively in 2014 it announced that from 2016 it would revert to calling the rounds of 64 and 32 the first and second rounds 6 a b Since the NCAA Division I women s tournament expanded beyond 32 teams in 1986 the round of 32 has always been called the second round and the preceding round the first round The women s tournament involved 64 teams from 1994 2021 before expanding to 68 in 2022 The FA Cup 2nd round involves 40 teams of which 20 qualify for the 3rd round to which the top 44 teams will have received byes The 8th qualifying round involves 88 teams of which 44 qualify for the 32nd finals to which the top 20 teams will have received byes The number of eligible teams is typically less than 128 but more than 64 so not all teams play this round Example EditThe final three rounds of the 2002 03 UEFA Champions League tournament Quarter finalsSemi finalsFinal Real Madrid336 Manchester United145 Real Madrid213 Juventus134 Juventus aet 123 Barcelona112 Juventus0 2 Milan p 0 3 Ajax022 Milan033 Milan a 011 Internazionale011 Internazionale a 112 Valencia022Quarter finals Edit Team 1 Agg Team 2 1st leg 2nd legReal Madrid 6 5 Manchester United 3 1 3 4Ajax 2 3 Milan 0 0 2 3Internazionale 2 2 a Valencia 1 0 1 2Juventus 3 2 Barcelona 1 1 2 1 aet Semi finals Edit Team 1 Agg Team 2 1st leg 2nd legReal Madrid 3 4 Juventus 2 1 1 3Milan 1 1 a Internazionale 0 0 1 1 Both clubs played their home leg in the same stadium the San Siro but Milan were the designated away side in the second leg and thus won on away goals Final Edit Main article 2003 UEFA Champions League Final 28 May 200319 45Juventus 0 0 a e t MilanReportPenaltiesTrezeguet Birindelli Zalayeta Montero Del Piero 2 3 Serginho Seedorf Kaladze Nesta ShevchenkoOld Trafford ManchesterAttendance 62 315Referee Markus Merk Germany Classification EditWithout any additional matches the only position a single elimination tournament can reliably determine is first for example if sorting the numbers 1 4 ascending if 4 and 3 meet in the first round 3 and 1 will lose in the first round and 2 will lose in the second selecting 4 as the largest number in the set but insufficient comparisons have been performed to determine which is greater 2 or 3 Despite this the candidate that loses in the final round is commonly considered to have taken second place in this case 2 When matches are held to determine places or prizes lower than first and second these typically include a match between the losers of the semifinal matches called third place playoffs the winner therein placing third and the loser fourth Many Olympic single elimination tournaments feature the bronze medal match if they do not award bronze medals to both losing semifinalists The FIFA World Cup has long featured the third place match since 1934 though the UEFA Euro has not held one since the 1980 edition Sometimes contests are also held among the losers of the quarterfinal matches to determine fifth to eighth places this is most commonly encountered in the Olympic Games with the exception of boxing where both fighters are deemed to be third place In one scenario two consolation semifinal matches may be conducted with the winners of these then facing off to determine fifth and sixth places and the losers playing for seventh and eighth those are used often in qualifying tournaments where only the top five teams advance to the next round or some method of ranking the four quarterfinal losers might be employed in which case only one round of additional matches would be held among them the two highest ranked therein then playing for fifth and sixth places and the two lowest for seventh and eighth The number of distinct ways of arranging a single elimination tournament as an abstract structure prior to seeding the players into the tournament is given by the Wedderburn Etherington numbers 7 Thus for instance there are three different arrangements for five players The players may be divided into brackets of two and three players the winners of which meet in the final game The bottom four players may play a two round tournament the winner of which plays the top player The bottom two players may meet after which each subsequent game pairs the winner of the previous game with the next playerHowever the number of arrangements grows quickly for larger numbers of players and not all of them are commonly used Seeding EditMain article Seed sports Opponents may be allocated randomly such as in the FA Cup however since the luck of the draw may result in the highest rated competitors being scheduled to face each other early in the competition seeding is often used to prevent this Brackets are set up so that the top two seeds could not possibly meet until the final round should both advance that far none of the top four can meet prior to the semifinals and so on If no seeding is used the tournament is called a random knockout tournament Standard seeding pairs the highest and lowest then second highest and second lowest and so on for an 8 seed tournament this is 1 v 8 2 v 7 3 v 6 and 4 v 5 for example this is used for 16 seeds in the World Snooker Championship and 32 seeds in the World Darts Championship Some tournaments stray from this for example is not the procedure that is followed in most tennis tournaments where the 1 and 2 seeds are placed in separate brackets but then the 3 and 4 seeds are assigned to their brackets randomly and so too are seeds 5 through 8 and so on This may result in some brackets consisting of stronger players than other brackets and since only the top 32 players of 128 are seeded in Tennis Grand Slam tournaments it is conceivable that the 33rd best player in a 128 player field could end up playing the top seed in the first round An example of this occurring was when World No 33 Florian Mayer was drawn against and eventually defeated by then World No 1 Novak Djokovic in the first round of the 2013 Wimbledon Championships 8 in what was also a rematch of a quarterfinal from the previous year 9 Sometimes the remaining competitors in a single elimination tournament will be re seeded so that the highest surviving seed is made to play the lowest surviving seed in the next round the second highest plays the second lowest etc This may be done after each round or only at selected intervals In American team sports for example the NFL employs this tactic but MLS NHL and the NBA do not and neither does the NCAA college basketball tournament MLB does not have enough teams 12 in its playoff tournament where re seeding would make a large difference in the matchups only the WNBA s at the minimum which is at least four from each conference for a total of 8 The NBA s format calls for the winner of the first round series between the first and eighth seeds within each of the two conferences the league has to face the winner of the first round series between the fourth and fifth seeds in the next round even if one or more of the top three seeds had been upset in their first round series critics have claimed that this gives a team fighting for the fifth and sixth seeding positions near the end of the regular season an incentive to tank deliberately lose games so as to finish sixth and thus avoid a possible match up with the top seed until one round later MLS format is identical except that the top seed gets a first round bye to play 4th 5th seed winner In some situations a seeding restriction may be implemented from 1975 until 1989 in the NFL and from 1994 until 2011 in MLB there was a rule where at the conference or league semifinal should the top seed and last seed wild card be from the same division they cannot play each other in that case the top seed plays the worst division champion the second best division champion plays the wild card team This is due to the scheduling employed for the regular season in which a team faces any given divisional opponent more often than any given non divisional opponent the tournament favors match ups that took place fewer times in the regular season or did not take place in some cases citation needed In international fencing competitions it is common to have a group stage Participants are divided in groups of 6 7 fencers who play a round robin tournament and a ranking is calculated from the consolidated group results Single elimination is seeded from this ranking Evaluation EditThe single elimination format enables a relatively large number of competitors to participate There are no dead matches perhaps excluding classification matches and no matches where one competitor has more to play for than the other The format is less suited to games where draws are frequent In chess each fixture in a single elimination tournament must be played over multiple matches because draws are common and because white has an advantage over black In association football games ending in a draw may be settled in extra time and eventually by a penalty shootout or by replaying the fixture Another perceived disadvantage is that most competitors are eliminated after relatively few games Variations such as the double elimination tournament allow competitors a single loss while remaining eligible for overall victory However losing one game requires the competitor to win more games in order to win the tournament In a random knockout tournament single elimination without any seeding awarding the second place to the loser of the final is unjustified any of the competitors knocked out by the tournament winner might have been the second strongest one but they never got the chance to play against the losing finalist In general it is only fair to use a single elimination tournament to determine first place To fairly determine lower places requires some form of round robin in which each player team gets the opportunity to face every other player team Also if the competitors performance is variable that is it depends on a small varying factor in addition to the actual strength of the competitors then not only will it become less likely that the strongest competitor actually wins the tournament in addition the seeding done by the tournament organizers will play a major part in deciding the winner 10 11 As a random factor is always present in a real world competition this might easily cause accusations of unfairness Other tournament systems EditVariations of the single elimination tournament include Double elimination tournament McIntyre System a group of tournament formats that combine features of single and double elimination tournaments Varieties of this system include Page playoff system four teams Top five play offs Top six play offs McIntyre Final Eight System Super League play offs which formerly used a McIntyre Final Eight variant AFL final eight system another variant of the McIntyre Final Eight currently used by the Australian Football LeagueOther common tournament types include Round robin tournament Swiss system tournamentReferences Edit In singles only the other disciplines have fewer rounds Coupe de France football resultats calendrier reportage photos in French French Football Federation Archived from the original on 19 July 2012 Retrieved 16 July 2012 Premier League clubs want the FA Cup moved to midweek and replays scrapped talkSPORT 31 May 2018 2017 Retrieved 31 March 2019 Emirates FA Cup 17 February 2017 We do now The sixth round has been renamed as the quarter finals from this season EmiratesFACup Twitter Retrieved 31 March 2019 Gentlemen s Singles 2012 Official Site by IBM Wimbledon Championships Website Retrieved 16 July 2012 2012 Tournament Schedule US Open Archived from the original on 17 July 2012 Retrieved 16 July 2012 Cary Tim 21 November 2014 What s in a Name March Madness First Round Is the First Round Again The Cheat Sheet Retrieved 6 June 2015 Maurer Willi 1975 On most effective tournament plans with fewer games than competitors The Annals of Statistics 3 3 717 727 doi 10 1214 aos 1176343135 JSTOR 2958441 MR 0371712 Wimbledon Novak vs Mayer in R1 Andy Roger Rafa all in bottom half Novak Djokovic official website 21 June 2013 Wimbledon 2013 Men s matches to watch out for The Roar 22 June 2013 Ryvkin Dmitry March 2005 The Predictive Power of Noisy Elimination Tournaments PDF CERGE EI Archived PDF from the original on 22 October 2007 Retrieved 21 October 2010 Kim Michael P Suksompong Warut Vassilevska Williams Virginia 2017 Who Can Win a Single Elimination Tournament SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 31 3 1751 1764 arXiv 1511 08416 doi 10 1137 16M1061783 hdl 1721 1 125608 S2CID 1251470 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Single elimination tournament amp oldid 1131105847, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.