fbpx
Wikipedia

Rhizoctonia solani

Rhizoctonia solani is a species of fungus in the order Cantharellales. Basidiocarps (fruit bodies) are thin, effused, and web-like, but the fungus is more typically encountered in its anamorphic state, as hyphae and sclerotia. The name Rhizoctonia solani is currently applied to a complex of related species that await further research. In its wide sense, Rhizoctonia solani is a facultative plant pathogen with a wide host range and worldwide distribution. It causes various plant diseases such as root rot, damping off, and wire stem. It can also form mycorrhizal associations with orchids.

Rhizoctonia solani
Microscopic image of Rhizoctonia solani hyphae showing typical right-angled branching
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Fungi
Division: Basidiomycota
Class: Agaricomycetes
Order: Cantharellales
Family: Ceratobasidiaceae
Genus: Rhizoctonia
Species:
R. solani
Binomial name
Rhizoctonia solani
J.G. Kühn, 1858
Synonyms
  • Moniliopsis solani (J.G. Kühn) R.T. Moore 1987

Taxonomy

In 1858, the German plant pathologist Julius Kühn observed and described a fungus on diseased potato tubers and named it Rhizoctonia solani, the species epithet referring to Solanum tuberosum (potato). The disease caused was well known before the discovery and description of the fungus.[1] In 1956, Dutch mycologist M.A. Donk published the new name Thanatephorus cucumeris for the spore-bearing teleomorph of R. solani, based on the species Hypochnus cucumeris originally described from diseased cucumbers in Germany.[2]

Subsequent research has shown that Rhizoctonia solani is a complex of related species.[3] This was originally based on observing hyphal anastomosis (or lack of it) in paired isolates grown in culture. Successful anastomosis indicated that the isolates were genetically similar, whilst unsuccessful anastomosis indicated they were dissimilar and distinct.[4] As a result Rhizoctonia solani has been split into at least 25 different "anastomosis groups" (AGs) and sub-groups.[5] These AGs tend to be associated with different plant diseases.[4][6]

Molecular research, based on cladistic analysis of DNA sequences, has largely supported the division of R. solani into AGs.[7][8]

Following changes to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the practice of giving different names to teleomorph and anamorph forms of the same fungus was discontinued, meaning that Thanatephorus became a synonym of the earlier name Rhizoctonia.[9] In its current sense, therefore, Rhizoctonia solani includes both anamorphic and teleomorphic forms of the fungus. Thanatephorus cucumeris is part of the R. solani species complex, but since it is based on a different type species, it may not be a synonym of R. solani sensu stricto.

Hosts and symptoms

Rhizoctonia solani sensu lato causes a wide range of commercially significant plant diseases. It is one of the fungi responsible for brown patch (a turfgrass disease), damping off (e.g. in soybean seedlings),[10] black scurf of potatoes,[11] bare patch of cereals,[12] root rot of sugar beet,[13] belly rot of cucumber,[14] sheath blight of rice,[15] and many other pathogenic conditions. The fungus, therefore, has a wide host range and strains of R. solani may differ in the hosts they are able to infect, the virulence of infection, selectivity for a given host (which may range from nonpathogenic to highly virulent), the temperature at which infection occurs, the ability to develop in lower soil levels, the ability to form sclerotia, the growth rate, and survival in a certain area. These factors may not always be distinctive in every host that Rhizoctonia attacks or in every strain thereof.[4]

 
R. solani causing crown rot infection on Beta vulgaris, common beet

R. solani primarily attacks seeds of plants below the soil surface, but can also infect pods, roots, leaves, and stems. The most common symptom of Rhizoctonia is "damping off", or the failure of infected seeds to germinate. R. solani may invade the seed before it has germinated to cause this pre-emergent damping off, or it can kill very young seedlings soon after they emerge from the soil. Seeds that do germinate before being killed by the fungus have reddish-brown lesions and cankers on stems and roots.

Various environmental conditions put plants at higher risk of infection. The pathogen prefers warmer, wet climates for infection and growth. Seedlings are most susceptible to disease in their early stages.[3]

Cereals in regions of England, South Australia, Canada, and India experience losses caused by R. solani every year. Roots are killed back, causing plants to be stunted and spindly. Other non-cereal plants in those regions can experience brown stumps as another symptom of the pathogen. R. solani can also cause hypocotyl and stem cankers on mature plants of tomatoes, potatoes, and cabbages. Strands of mycelium and sometimes sclerotia appear on their surfaces. Roots turn brown and die after a period of time. The best known symptom of R. solani is black scurf on potato tubers, the scurf being the sclerotia of the fungus.

 
Symptoms on common beans, Rhizoctonia damping off, blight, and rot

Disease cycle

Rhizoctonia solani can survive in the soil for many years in the form of sclerotia. Sclerotia of Rhizoctonia have thick outer layers to allow for survival, and they function as the overwintering structure for the pathogen. In some rare cases (such as the teleomorph) the pathogen may also take on the form of mycelia that reside in the soil, as well. The fungus is attracted to the plant by chemical stimuli released by a growing plant and/or decomposing plant residue. The process of penetration of a host can be accomplished in a number of ways. Entry can occur through direct penetration of the plant cuticle/epidermis or by means of natural openings in the plant. Hyphae come in contact with the plant and attach to the plant by which through growth they begin to produce an appressorium which penetrates the plant cell and allows for the pathogen to obtain nutrients from the plant cell. The pathogen can also release enzymes that break down plant cell walls, and continues to colonize and grow inside dead tissue. This breakdown of the cell walls and colonization of the pathogen within the host forms the sclerotia. New inoculum is produced on or within the host tissue, and a new cycle is repeated when new plants become available. The disease cycle begins as such:

  1. Sclerotia/mycelium overwinter in plant debris, soil, or host plants.
  2. The young hyphae and fruiting basidia (rare) emerge and produce mycelia and rarely basidiospores.
  3. The very rare production of the germinating basidiospores penetrate the stoma, whereas the mycelia land on the plant surface and secrete the necessary enzymes onto the plant surface to initiate invasion of the host plant.
  4. After the mycelia successfully invade the host, necrosis and sclerotia form in and around the infected tissue which then leads to the various symptoms associated with the disease, such as soil rot, stem rot, damping off, etc. and the process begins all over again.[16]

Environment

The pathogen is known to prefer warm, wet weather, and outbreaks typically occur in the early summer months. Most symptoms of the pathogen do not occur until late summer, thus most farmers do not become aware of the diseased crop until harvest. A combination of environmental factors has been linked to the prevalence of the pathogen, such as presence of host plant, frequent rainfall/irrigation, and increased temperatures in spring and summer. In addition, poor drainage of the soil (whether caused by parent soil texture, or by compaction) is also known to create favorable environments for the pathogen.[17] The pathogen is dispersed as sclerotia, and these sclerotia can travel by means of wind, water, or soil movement between host plants.

Identification

 
R. solani infection on cucumber

Basidiocarps (fruit bodies) are thin, effused, web-like, corticioid, smooth, and ochraceous. Microscopically they have comparatively wide hyphae without clamp connections. Basidia bear 2 to 4 sterigmata. Basidiospores are ellipsoid to oblong, smooth, and colourless, 7 to 10 x 4 to 5.5 μm. They frequently produce secondary spores and germinate by hyphal tubes. The anamorphs consist of hyphae and occasionally sclerotia (small propagules composed of thick-walled hyphae).[6] The fungus produces white to deep brown mycelium when grown on an artificial medium and can often be recognized by the hyphae which are frequently monilioid (forming chains of swollen hyphal compartments), 4 to 15 μm wide, multinucleate, and tend to branch at right angles.

Management

Complete control of Rhizoctonia solani is not possible, but the severity of the pathogen can be limited. Successful control depends on characteristics of the pathogen, host crops, and the environment.[18] Controlling the environment, crop rotation, using resistant varieties,[4] and minimizing soil compaction are effective and non-invasive ways to manage disease. Planting seedlings in warmer soil and getting plants to emerge quickly helps minimize damage. Crop rotation also helps minimize the amount of inoculum that results in infection. A few resistant varieties with moderate resistance to R. solani can be used, but they produce lower yields and quantity than standard varieties. Minimizing soil compaction helps water infiltration, drainage, and aeration for the plants.

One specific chemical option is a chemical spray pentachloronitrobenzene (PCNB), which is known to be the best solution to reducing damping-off of seeds on host plants. To minimize this soil-borne disease, certified seed free of sclerotia can be planted. Although fungicides are not the most effective way to manage this pathogen, a few have been approved in the United States by the USDA for control of the pathogen.

As long as seed growers stay clear of wet, poorly drained areas while also avoiding susceptible crops, R. solani is not usually a problem. Diseases caused by this pathogen are more severe in soils that are moderately wet and a temperature range of 15–18 °C (59–64 °F).[19]

Rice genetically engineered for overexpression of oxalate oxidase has increased in vivo resistance.[20]

Economic importance

In the United States, Rhizoctonia solani can be found across all areas (environmental conditions permitting) where its host crops are located. The severity of infection can vary. Consequences include major yield losses (from 25% to 100%), increased soil tare (because the soil sticks to the fungal mycelium), and poor industrial quality of the crops based on increased levels of sodium, potassium, and nitrogen. Due to the number of hosts that the pathogen attacks, these consequences are numerous and detrimental to a variety of crops. Sheath blight caused by this pathogen is the second-most devastating disease after rice blast.[21]

Mycorrhizal association with orchids

Rhizoctonia solani is one of several Rhizoctonia species forming mycorrhizal associations with orchids. This association includes plant pathogenic strains of the fungus[22] as well as non-pathogenic strains.[23]

Genome

The draft genome of R. solani strain Rhs1AP covers 51.7 Mbp, although the heterokaryotic genome of this strain was estimated at 86 Mb, based on an optical map of the chromosomes. The discrepancy is explained by the aneuploid, highly repetitive genome of this species which prevented sequencing (or assembling) the complete DNA. The genome is predicted to encode 12,726 genes.[24] Another strain,  AG1-IB 7/3/14, was recently sequenced too.[25]

References

  1. ^ [Parmeter, J. R. Rhizoctonia solani, Biology and Pathology. London, UK: University of California, 1970. Print.], University of California Biology and Pathology.
  2. ^ Donk MA (1956). "Notes on resupinate fungi II. The tulasnelloid fungi". Reinwardtia. 3: 363–379.
  3. ^ a b Cubeta MA, Vilgalys R (1997). "Population biology of the Rhizoctonia solani complex". Phytopathology. 87 (4): 480–84. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.4.480. PMID 18945130.
  4. ^ a b c d Ogoshi, A (1987). "Ecology and Pathogenicity of Anastomosis and Intraspecific Groups of Rhizoctonia Solani Kuhn". Annual Review of Phytopathology. Annual Reviews. 25 (1): 125–143. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.25.090187.001013.
  5. ^ Ogoshi A (1996). "Introduction—the genus Rhizoctonia". Rhizoctonia Species: Taxonomy, Molecular Biology, Ecology, Pathology and Disease Control: 1–9.
  6. ^ a b Roberts P. (1999). Rhizoctonia-forming fungi. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. p. 239. ISBN 1-900347-69-5.
  7. ^ Gonzalez D, Carling DE, Kuninaga S, Vilgalys R, Cubeta MA (2001). "Ribosomal DNA systematics of Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus with Rhizoctonia anamorphs". Mycologia. 93 (6): 1138–1150. doi:10.1080/00275514.2001.12063247. S2CID 196619800.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ Sharon M, Sneh B, Kuninaga S, Hyakumachi M, Naito S (2008). "Classification of Rhizoctonia spp. using rDNA-ITS sequence analysis supports the genetic basis of the classical anastomosis grouping". Mycoscience. 49 (2): 93–114. doi:10.1007/S10267-007-0394-0. S2CID 86120090.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. ^ Oberwinkler F, Riess K, Bauer R, Kirschner R, Garnica S (2013). "Taxonomic re-evaluation of the Ceratobasidium-Rhizoctonia complex and Rhizoctonia butinii, a new species attacking spruce". Mycological Progress. 12 (4): 763–776. doi:10.1007/s11557-013-0936-0. S2CID 255319267.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. ^ Shanmugasundaram, S.; Yeh, C.C.; Hartman, G.L.; Talekar, N.S. (1991). Vegetable Soybean Research Needs for Production and Quality Improvement (PDF). Taipei: Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center. pp. 86–87. ISBN 9789290580478. Retrieved 6 February 2016.
  11. ^ Rhizoctonia disease of potato http://vegetablemdonline.ppath.cornell.edu/factsheets/Potato_Rhizoctonia.htm
  12. ^ Rhizoctonia root rot http://cbarc.aes.oregonstate.edu/rhizoctonia-root-rot-bare-patch
  13. ^ Rhizoctonia diseases of sugar beet . Archived from the original on 2010-06-19. Retrieved 2010-08-05.
  14. ^ Rhizoctonia disease of cucumber http://cuke.hort.ncsu.edu/cucurbit/cuke/dshndbk/br.html
  15. ^ Rhizoctonia sheath blight https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/pbi.13312
  16. ^ Ceresini, Paulo. Rhizoctonia Solani. Rhizoctonia Solani. NC State University. Web. 04 November 2011 <http://www.cals.ncsu.edu/course/pp728/Rhizoctonia/Rhizoctonia.html>, NC State University Rhizoctonia Solani.
  17. ^ "Rhizoctonia Diseases." Michigan Potato Diseases. P.S. Wharton, Michigan State University, 2 May 2011. Web. 04 Oct. 2011. <http://www.potatodiseases.org/rhizoctonia.html>, P.S Wharton Michigan State University.
  18. ^ Uchida, Janice Y. "Rhizoctonia Solani." Knowledge Master. Web. 04 Oct. 2011. <http://www.extento.hawaii.edu/kbase/crop/type/r_solani.htm>, Janice Uchilda Knowledge Master.
  19. ^ Anderson, Neil A (1982). "The Genetics and Pathology of Rhizoctonia Solani". Annual Review of Phytopathology. Annual Reviews. 20 (1): 329–347. doi:10.1146/annurev.py.20.090182.001553. ISSN 0066-4286.
  20. ^ Molla, Kutubuddin A.; Karmakar, Subhasis; Chanda, Palas K.; Ghosh, Satabdi; Sarkar, Sailendra N.; Datta, Swapan K.; Datta, Karabi (2013-07-01). "Rice oxalate oxidase gene driven by green tissue-specific promoter increases tolerance to sheath blight pathogen (Rhizoctonia solani) in transgenic rice". Molecular Plant Pathology. Wiley. 14 (9): 910–922. doi:10.1111/mpp.12055. ISSN 1464-6722. PMC 6638683. PMID 23809026. S2CID 38358538.
  21. ^ Molecular Plant Pathology (2013) 14(9), 910–922
  22. ^ Williamson B. Hadley G (1970). "Penetration and infection of orchid protocorms by Thanatephorus cucumeris". Pathology. 60: 1092–1096.
  23. ^ Carling DE, Pope EJ, Brainard KA, Carter DA (1999). "Characterization of mycorrhizal isolates of Rhizoctonia solani from an orchid, including AG-12, a new anastomosis group". Phytopathology. 89 (10): 942–946. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.10.942. PMID 18944739.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ^ Cubeta MA, Thomas E, Dean RA, Jabaji S, Neate SM, Tavantzis S, Toda T, Vilgalys R, Bharathan N, Fedorova-Abrams N, Pakala SB, Pakala SM, Zafar N, Joardar V, Losada L, Nierman WC (2014). "Draft Genome Sequence of the Plant-Pathogenic Soil Fungus Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Group 3 Strain Rhs1AP". Genome Announc. 2 (5): e01072-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.01072-14. PMC 4214984. PMID 25359908.
  25. ^ Wibberg D, Rupp O, Jelonek L, Kröber M, Verwaaijen B, Blom J, Winkler A, Goesmann A, Grosch R, Pühler A, Schlüter A (2015). "Improved genome sequence of the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IB 7/3/14 as established by deep mate-pair sequencing on the MiSeq (Illumina) system". J. Biotechnol. 203: 19–21. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.03.005. PMID 25801332.

rhizoctonia, solani, species, fungus, order, cantharellales, basidiocarps, fruit, bodies, thin, effused, like, fungus, more, typically, encountered, anamorphic, state, hyphae, sclerotia, name, currently, applied, complex, related, species, that, await, further. Rhizoctonia solani is a species of fungus in the order Cantharellales Basidiocarps fruit bodies are thin effused and web like but the fungus is more typically encountered in its anamorphic state as hyphae and sclerotia The name Rhizoctonia solani is currently applied to a complex of related species that await further research In its wide sense Rhizoctonia solani is a facultative plant pathogen with a wide host range and worldwide distribution It causes various plant diseases such as root rot damping off and wire stem It can also form mycorrhizal associations with orchids Rhizoctonia solaniMicroscopic image of Rhizoctonia solani hyphae showing typical right angled branchingScientific classificationKingdom FungiDivision BasidiomycotaClass AgaricomycetesOrder CantharellalesFamily CeratobasidiaceaeGenus RhizoctoniaSpecies R solaniBinomial nameRhizoctonia solaniJ G Kuhn 1858SynonymsMoniliopsis solani J G Kuhn R T Moore 1987 Contents 1 Taxonomy 2 Hosts and symptoms 3 Disease cycle 4 Environment 5 Identification 6 Management 7 Economic importance 8 Mycorrhizal association with orchids 9 Genome 10 ReferencesTaxonomy EditIn 1858 the German plant pathologist Julius Kuhn observed and described a fungus on diseased potato tubers and named it Rhizoctonia solani the species epithet referring to Solanum tuberosum potato The disease caused was well known before the discovery and description of the fungus 1 In 1956 Dutch mycologist M A Donk published the new name Thanatephorus cucumeris for the spore bearing teleomorph of R solani based on the species Hypochnus cucumeris originally described from diseased cucumbers in Germany 2 Subsequent research has shown that Rhizoctonia solani is a complex of related species 3 This was originally based on observing hyphal anastomosis or lack of it in paired isolates grown in culture Successful anastomosis indicated that the isolates were genetically similar whilst unsuccessful anastomosis indicated they were dissimilar and distinct 4 As a result Rhizoctonia solani has been split into at least 25 different anastomosis groups AGs and sub groups 5 These AGs tend to be associated with different plant diseases 4 6 Molecular research based on cladistic analysis of DNA sequences has largely supported the division of R solani into AGs 7 8 Following changes to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae fungi and plants the practice of giving different names to teleomorph and anamorph forms of the same fungus was discontinued meaning that Thanatephorus became a synonym of the earlier name Rhizoctonia 9 In its current sense therefore Rhizoctonia solani includes both anamorphic and teleomorphic forms of the fungus Thanatephorus cucumeris is part of the R solani species complex but since it is based on a different type species it may not be a synonym of R solani sensu stricto Hosts and symptoms EditRhizoctonia solani sensu lato causes a wide range of commercially significant plant diseases It is one of the fungi responsible for brown patch a turfgrass disease damping off e g in soybean seedlings 10 black scurf of potatoes 11 bare patch of cereals 12 root rot of sugar beet 13 belly rot of cucumber 14 sheath blight of rice 15 and many other pathogenic conditions The fungus therefore has a wide host range and strains of R solani may differ in the hosts they are able to infect the virulence of infection selectivity for a given host which may range from nonpathogenic to highly virulent the temperature at which infection occurs the ability to develop in lower soil levels the ability to form sclerotia the growth rate and survival in a certain area These factors may not always be distinctive in every host that Rhizoctonia attacks or in every strain thereof 4 R solani causing crown rot infection on Beta vulgaris common beet R solani primarily attacks seeds of plants below the soil surface but can also infect pods roots leaves and stems The most common symptom of Rhizoctonia is damping off or the failure of infected seeds to germinate R solani may invade the seed before it has germinated to cause this pre emergent damping off or it can kill very young seedlings soon after they emerge from the soil Seeds that do germinate before being killed by the fungus have reddish brown lesions and cankers on stems and roots Various environmental conditions put plants at higher risk of infection The pathogen prefers warmer wet climates for infection and growth Seedlings are most susceptible to disease in their early stages 3 Cereals in regions of England South Australia Canada and India experience losses caused by R solani every year Roots are killed back causing plants to be stunted and spindly Other non cereal plants in those regions can experience brown stumps as another symptom of the pathogen R solani can also cause hypocotyl and stem cankers on mature plants of tomatoes potatoes and cabbages Strands of mycelium and sometimes sclerotia appear on their surfaces Roots turn brown and die after a period of time The best known symptom of R solani is black scurf on potato tubers the scurf being the sclerotia of the fungus Symptoms on common beans Rhizoctonia damping off blight and rotDisease cycle EditRhizoctonia solani can survive in the soil for many years in the form of sclerotia Sclerotia of Rhizoctonia have thick outer layers to allow for survival and they function as the overwintering structure for the pathogen In some rare cases such as the teleomorph the pathogen may also take on the form of mycelia that reside in the soil as well The fungus is attracted to the plant by chemical stimuli released by a growing plant and or decomposing plant residue The process of penetration of a host can be accomplished in a number of ways Entry can occur through direct penetration of the plant cuticle epidermis or by means of natural openings in the plant Hyphae come in contact with the plant and attach to the plant by which through growth they begin to produce an appressorium which penetrates the plant cell and allows for the pathogen to obtain nutrients from the plant cell The pathogen can also release enzymes that break down plant cell walls and continues to colonize and grow inside dead tissue This breakdown of the cell walls and colonization of the pathogen within the host forms the sclerotia New inoculum is produced on or within the host tissue and a new cycle is repeated when new plants become available The disease cycle begins as such Sclerotia mycelium overwinter in plant debris soil or host plants The young hyphae and fruiting basidia rare emerge and produce mycelia and rarely basidiospores The very rare production of the germinating basidiospores penetrate the stoma whereas the mycelia land on the plant surface and secrete the necessary enzymes onto the plant surface to initiate invasion of the host plant After the mycelia successfully invade the host necrosis and sclerotia form in and around the infected tissue which then leads to the various symptoms associated with the disease such as soil rot stem rot damping off etc and the process begins all over again 16 Environment EditThe pathogen is known to prefer warm wet weather and outbreaks typically occur in the early summer months Most symptoms of the pathogen do not occur until late summer thus most farmers do not become aware of the diseased crop until harvest A combination of environmental factors has been linked to the prevalence of the pathogen such as presence of host plant frequent rainfall irrigation and increased temperatures in spring and summer In addition poor drainage of the soil whether caused by parent soil texture or by compaction is also known to create favorable environments for the pathogen 17 The pathogen is dispersed as sclerotia and these sclerotia can travel by means of wind water or soil movement between host plants Identification Edit R solani infection on cucumber Basidiocarps fruit bodies are thin effused web like corticioid smooth and ochraceous Microscopically they have comparatively wide hyphae without clamp connections Basidia bear 2 to 4 sterigmata Basidiospores are ellipsoid to oblong smooth and colourless 7 to 10 x 4 to 5 5 mm They frequently produce secondary spores and germinate by hyphal tubes The anamorphs consist of hyphae and occasionally sclerotia small propagules composed of thick walled hyphae 6 The fungus produces white to deep brown mycelium when grown on an artificial medium and can often be recognized by the hyphae which are frequently monilioid forming chains of swollen hyphal compartments 4 to 15 mm wide multinucleate and tend to branch at right angles Management EditComplete control of Rhizoctonia solani is not possible but the severity of the pathogen can be limited Successful control depends on characteristics of the pathogen host crops and the environment 18 Controlling the environment crop rotation using resistant varieties 4 and minimizing soil compaction are effective and non invasive ways to manage disease Planting seedlings in warmer soil and getting plants to emerge quickly helps minimize damage Crop rotation also helps minimize the amount of inoculum that results in infection A few resistant varieties with moderate resistance to R solani can be used but they produce lower yields and quantity than standard varieties Minimizing soil compaction helps water infiltration drainage and aeration for the plants One specific chemical option is a chemical spray pentachloronitrobenzene PCNB which is known to be the best solution to reducing damping off of seeds on host plants To minimize this soil borne disease certified seed free of sclerotia can be planted Although fungicides are not the most effective way to manage this pathogen a few have been approved in the United States by the USDA for control of the pathogen As long as seed growers stay clear of wet poorly drained areas while also avoiding susceptible crops R solani is not usually a problem Diseases caused by this pathogen are more severe in soils that are moderately wet and a temperature range of 15 18 C 59 64 F 19 Rice genetically engineered for overexpression of oxalate oxidase has increased in vivo resistance 20 Economic importance EditIn the United States Rhizoctonia solani can be found across all areas environmental conditions permitting where its host crops are located The severity of infection can vary Consequences include major yield losses from 25 to 100 increased soil tare because the soil sticks to the fungal mycelium and poor industrial quality of the crops based on increased levels of sodium potassium and nitrogen Due to the number of hosts that the pathogen attacks these consequences are numerous and detrimental to a variety of crops Sheath blight caused by this pathogen is the second most devastating disease after rice blast 21 Mycorrhizal association with orchids EditRhizoctonia solani is one of several Rhizoctonia species forming mycorrhizal associations with orchids This association includes plant pathogenic strains of the fungus 22 as well as non pathogenic strains 23 Genome EditThe draft genome of R solani strain Rhs1AP covers 51 7 Mbp although the heterokaryotic genome of this strain was estimated at 86 Mb based on an optical map of the chromosomes The discrepancy is explained by the aneuploid highly repetitive genome of this species which prevented sequencing or assembling the complete DNA The genome is predicted to encode 12 726 genes 24 Another strain AG1 IB 7 3 14 was recently sequenced too 25 References Edit Parmeter J R Rhizoctonia solani Biology and Pathology London UK University of California 1970 Print University of California Biology and Pathology Donk MA 1956 Notes on resupinate fungi II The tulasnelloid fungi Reinwardtia 3 363 379 a b Cubeta MA Vilgalys R 1997 Population biology of the Rhizoctonia solani complex Phytopathology 87 4 480 84 doi 10 1094 PHYTO 1997 87 4 480 PMID 18945130 a b c d Ogoshi A 1987 Ecology and Pathogenicity of Anastomosis and Intraspecific Groups of Rhizoctonia Solani Kuhn Annual Review of Phytopathology Annual Reviews 25 1 125 143 doi 10 1146 annurev py 25 090187 001013 Ogoshi A 1996 Introduction the genus Rhizoctonia Rhizoctonia Species Taxonomy Molecular Biology Ecology Pathology and Disease Control 1 9 a b Roberts P 1999 Rhizoctonia forming fungi Kew Royal Botanic Gardens p 239 ISBN 1 900347 69 5 Gonzalez D Carling DE Kuninaga S Vilgalys R Cubeta MA 2001 Ribosomal DNA systematics of Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus with Rhizoctonia anamorphs Mycologia 93 6 1138 1150 doi 10 1080 00275514 2001 12063247 S2CID 196619800 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Sharon M Sneh B Kuninaga S Hyakumachi M Naito S 2008 Classification of Rhizoctonia spp using rDNA ITS sequence analysis supports the genetic basis of the classical anastomosis grouping Mycoscience 49 2 93 114 doi 10 1007 S10267 007 0394 0 S2CID 86120090 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Oberwinkler F Riess K Bauer R Kirschner R Garnica S 2013 Taxonomic re evaluation of the Ceratobasidium Rhizoctonia complex and Rhizoctonia butinii a new species attacking spruce Mycological Progress 12 4 763 776 doi 10 1007 s11557 013 0936 0 S2CID 255319267 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Shanmugasundaram S Yeh C C Hartman G L Talekar N S 1991 Vegetable Soybean Research Needs for Production and Quality Improvement PDF Taipei Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center pp 86 87 ISBN 9789290580478 Retrieved 6 February 2016 Rhizoctonia disease of potato http vegetablemdonline ppath cornell edu factsheets Potato Rhizoctonia htm Rhizoctonia root rot http cbarc aes oregonstate edu rhizoctonia root rot bare patch Rhizoctonia diseases of sugar beet Management of Rhizoctonia Root Rot of Sugarbeet Archived from the original on 2010 06 19 Retrieved 2010 08 05 Rhizoctonia disease of cucumber http cuke hort ncsu edu cucurbit cuke dshndbk br html Rhizoctonia sheath blight https onlinelibrary wiley com doi full 10 1111 pbi 13312 Ceresini Paulo Rhizoctonia Solani Rhizoctonia Solani NC State University Web 04 November 2011 lt http www cals ncsu edu course pp728 Rhizoctonia Rhizoctonia html gt NC State University Rhizoctonia Solani Rhizoctonia Diseases Michigan Potato Diseases P S Wharton Michigan State University 2 May 2011 Web 04 Oct 2011 lt http www potatodiseases org rhizoctonia html gt P S Wharton Michigan State University Uchida Janice Y Rhizoctonia Solani Knowledge Master Web 04 Oct 2011 lt http www extento hawaii edu kbase crop type r solani htm gt Janice Uchilda Knowledge Master Anderson Neil A 1982 The Genetics and Pathology of Rhizoctonia Solani Annual Review of Phytopathology Annual Reviews 20 1 329 347 doi 10 1146 annurev py 20 090182 001553 ISSN 0066 4286 Molla Kutubuddin A Karmakar Subhasis Chanda Palas K Ghosh Satabdi Sarkar Sailendra N Datta Swapan K Datta Karabi 2013 07 01 Rice oxalate oxidase gene driven by green tissue specific promoter increases tolerance to sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani in transgenic rice Molecular Plant Pathology Wiley 14 9 910 922 doi 10 1111 mpp 12055 ISSN 1464 6722 PMC 6638683 PMID 23809026 S2CID 38358538 Molecular Plant Pathology 2013 14 9 910 922 Williamson B Hadley G 1970 Penetration and infection of orchid protocorms by Thanatephorus cucumeris Pathology 60 1092 1096 Carling DE Pope EJ Brainard KA Carter DA 1999 Characterization of mycorrhizal isolates of Rhizoctonia solani from an orchid including AG 12 a new anastomosis group Phytopathology 89 10 942 946 doi 10 1094 PHYTO 1999 89 10 942 PMID 18944739 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Cubeta MA Thomas E Dean RA Jabaji S Neate SM Tavantzis S Toda T Vilgalys R Bharathan N Fedorova Abrams N Pakala SB Pakala SM Zafar N Joardar V Losada L Nierman WC 2014 Draft Genome Sequence of the Plant Pathogenic Soil Fungus Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Group 3 Strain Rhs1AP Genome Announc 2 5 e01072 14 doi 10 1128 genomeA 01072 14 PMC 4214984 PMID 25359908 Wibberg D Rupp O Jelonek L Krober M Verwaaijen B Blom J Winkler A Goesmann A Grosch R Puhler A Schluter A 2015 Improved genome sequence of the phytopathogenic fungus Rhizoctonia solani AG1 IB 7 3 14 as established by deep mate pair sequencing on the MiSeq Illumina system J Biotechnol 203 19 21 doi 10 1016 j jbiotec 2015 03 005 PMID 25801332 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Rhizoctonia solani amp oldid 1143161704, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.