Psychological research

For the academic journal, see Psychological Research.

Psychological research refers to research that psychologists conduct for systematic study and for analysis of the experiences and behaviors of individuals or groups. Their research can have educational, occupational and clinical applications.

History

Wilhelm Wundt is credited as one of the founders of psychology. He created the first laboratory for psychological research.^[1]

Philosophical foundations

Main articles: Philosophy of mind and Philosophy of psychology

Ethical considerations

Main articles: Human subject research and Animal testing

Psychological research risks harming the subjects of the research. In order to prevent that harm, proposed studies are usually approved by an institutional review board to ensure that the risks to the research subjects are justified by the anticipated benefits.^[2] IRBs also verify that informed consent has been obtained. This involves documenting that the subject (or legally authorized representative) agrees to being a subject after having been informed of what the research is about, risks and benefits to the subject, that the subject may discontinue participation at any time, and how personally identifiable information will be handled.^[3]

Some research, such as the Milgram experiment, have raised questions about the research ethics and resulted in the revision of the ethical standards of psychological research.^[4]

Methodology

Main article: List of psychological research methods

Psychologists use many research methods, and categorical distinctions of these methods have emerged. Methods can be categorized by the kind of data they produce: qualitative or quantitative—and both these are used for pure or applied research.

Psychology tends to be eclectic, applying knowledge from other fields. Some of its methods are used within other areas of research, especially in the social and behavioural sciences.

Experimental methods

Main articles: Experiment and Experimental psychology

The field of psychology commonly uses experimental methods in what is known as experimental psychology. Researchers design experiments to test specific hypotheses (the deductive approach), or to evaluate functional relationships (the inductive approach).

The method of experimentation involves an experimenter changing some influence—the independent variable(IV)— on the research subjects, and studying the effects it produces on an expected aspect—the dependent variable (DV)— of the subjects behaviour or experience.^[5] Other variables researchers consider in experimentation are known as the extraneous variables, and are either controllable or confounding (more than one variable at play).

Confounding variables are external variables that are not taken into account when conducting an experiment.^[6] Because they are not controlled for, they can skew experiments results and provide a false or unreliable conclusion. For example, the psychologist Seymour Feshbach conducted an experiment to see how violence on television (the independent variable), affected aggression in adolescent boys (the dependent variable). He published his results in a paper called Television and Aggression in 1971. The paper showed that, in some cases, the lack of violence on television made the boys more aggressive.^[7] This was due to a confounding variable, which in this case was frustration.^[8] This means that extraneous variables are important to consider when designing experiments, and many methods have emerged to scientifically control them. For this reason, many experiments in psychology are conducted in laboratory conditions where they can be more strictly regulated.

Alternatively, some experiments are less controlled. Quasi-experiment's are those that a researcher sets up in a controlled environment, but does not control the independent variable. For example, Michael R. Cunningham used a quasi-experiment to "...measure the physical in physical attractiveness."^[9] On the other hand, in field experiments the experimenter controls an independent variable (making it the control variable), but does not control the environment where the experiment takes place. Experimenters sometimes apply fewer controls, as a way to lessen potential biases. In a true experiment, participants are randomly chosen to remove the chance of experimenter's bias.^[10]

Observational methods

Main article: Observational study

Observational research, (a type of non-experimental, correlational research), involves the researcher observing the ongoing behavior of their subjects.^[11] There are multiple methods of observational research such as participant observations, non-participant observations and naturalistic observations.^[11]

Participant observations are methods that involve a researcher joining the particular social group they are studying. For example, the social psychologist, Leon Festinger and his associates, joined a group called The Seekers in order to observe them. The Seekers believed they were in touch with aliens, and that the aliens had told them the world was about to end.^[12] When the foretasted event did not happen, Festinger and his associates observed how the attitudes of the group members changed. They published their results in a 1956 book called When Prophecy Fails. David Rosenhan in 1973 published a journal that involved research by participant observations.^[11] see: on being sane in insane places.

The other method of observational research is non-participant observation. In particular naturalistic methods are methods that simply study behaviours that occur naturally in natural environments—with no manipulation by the observer.^[13][14] The events studied must be natural and not staged. This fact gives naturalistic observational research a high ecological validity.^[11] During naturalistic observations, researchers can avoid interfering with the behavior they are observing by using unobtrusive methods,^[15] if needed.

Both types of observational methods are designed to be as reliable as possible. Reliability can be estimated using inter-observer reliability, that is, by comparing observations conducted by different researchers.^[1] Intra-observer reliability means estimating the reliability of an observation using a comparison of observations conducted by the same researcher. The reliability of conducted studies is important in any field of science.^[16]

For a statistical perspective of reliability, see also Reliability (statistics).

Descriptive methods

Main article: Descriptive research

All scientific processes begin with a description based on observation. Theories may develop later to explain these observations^[17] or classify associated phenomena.^[18] In scientific methodology, the conceptualizing of descriptive research precedes the hypotheses of "explanatory research".^[19]

An example of a descriptive device used in psychological research is the diary, which is used to record observations. There is a history of use of diaries within clinical psychology.^[20] Examples of psychologists that used them include B.F. Skinner (1904–1990) and Virginia Axline (1911–1988). A special case of a diary in this context, that has particular importance in development psychology, is known as the baby biography,^[21] and was used by psychologists such as Jean Piaget.

Other recording methods can include video or audio. For example, forensic psychologists record custodial interrogations to aid law enforcement.^[22]

Case studies

Main article: Case study in psychology

A case study—or case report—is an intensive analysis of a person, group, or event that stresses developmental factors related to the context. Case studies may be descriptive or explanatory. Explanatory case studies explore causation to identify underlying principles.^[23][24] However, there is a debate to whether case studies count as a scientific research method. Clinical psychologists use case studies most often, especially to describe abnormal events and conditions, which are particularly important in clinical research.^[25] Sigmund Freud made extensive use of case studies to formulate his theory of psychoanalysis.

Famous case studies include: Anna O. and Rat Man of Freud's Genie, who is one of the most severe cases of social isolation ever recorded,^[26] and Washoe, a chimpanzee who was the first non-human that had learned to communicate using American Sign Language.^[27]

Surveys

Main article: Statistical survey

Interviews and questionnaires intrude as a foreign element into the social setting they would describe, they create as well as measure attitudes, they elicit atypical role and response, they are limited to those who are accessible and who will cooperate, and the responses obtained are produced in part by dimensions of individual differences irrelevant to the topic at hand.^[28]

Bradburn et al. (1979) found a tendency for survey respondents to over-report socially desirable behaviors when interviewed using less anonymous methods.^[29]

Psychometric methods

Main article: Psychometrics

Psychometrics is a field of study concerned with the theory and technique of psychological measurement. One part of the field is concerned with the objective measurement of skills and knowledge, abilities, attitudes, personality traits, and educational achievement.

Archival methods

Main article: Archival research

Archival research can be defined as the study of existing data. The existing data is collected to answer research questions. Existing data sources may include statistical records, survey archives, previous history and written records.^[1]

Cross-sectional methods

Main article: Cross-sectional study

Cross-sectional research is a research method often used in developmental psychology, but also utilized in many other areas including social science and education. This type of study utilizes different groups of people who differ in the variable of interest, but share other characteristics such as socioeconomic status, educational background, and ethnicity.^[1]

For example, researchers studying developmental psychology might select groups of people who are remarkably similar in most areas, but differ only in age.^[1]

Longitudinal methods

Main article: Longitudinal study

Longitudinal research is a type of research method used to discover relationships between variables that are not related to various background variables. This observational research technique involves studying the same group of individuals over an extended period of time.^[1]

Data is first collected at the outset of the study, and may then be gathered repeatedly throughout the length of the study. In some cases, longitudinal studies can last several decades.^[1]

Cohort methods

Main article: Cohort study

Essentially, cohort refers to people who are approximately the same age. When researchers conduct different types of studies (for example, developmental/cross sectional studies), they use cohorts to see how people of different ages compare on some topic at one point in time. For example, a researcher may compare the effects of a new study aid in three different cohorts: 10th graders, 11th graders, and 12th graders. In this way, you can examine the study aid across three different grade levels.^[30]

Cross-cultural methods

Main article: Cross-cultural psychology

Cross-cultural psychology is a branch of psychology that looks at how cultural factors influence human behavior.^[31]

Computational methods

Main article: Computer simulations in psychology

A discipline lying on the border between artificial intelligence and psychology. It is concerned with building computer models of human cognitive processes and is based on an analogy between the human mind and computer programs. The brain and computer are viewed as general-purpose symbol-manipulation systems, capable of supporting software processes, but no analogy is drawn at a hardware level.^[32]

Unobtrusive methods

Main article: Unobtrusive research

The term unobtrusive measures was first coined by Eugene Webb, Campbell, Schwartz, and Sechrest in a 1966 book, Unobtrusive methods: Nonreactive research in the social science,^[28] in which they described methods that do not involve direct induction of data from research subjects. For example, the evidence people leave behind as they traverse their physical environment is unobtrusive. Unobtrusive methods get around biases, such as the selection bias and the experimenter's bias, that result from the researcher and his intrusion. Consequently, however, these methods reduce the researcher's control over the type of data collected.^[33]

Web and others regard these methods as an additional tools to use with the more common reactive and intrusive methods.^[28]

Criticisms of Research in Psychology

There are several factors that need to be considered when conducting and evaluating psychological research. One of these considerations is in how political values influence the publication and application of psychological research. For example, a study was published about child sexual abuse and how it might relate to psychopathology in college students.^[34] Though the findings claimed nothing extreme, both the political right and political left put so much pressure on the APA that eventually, the APA formally apologized for the study publicly stating that they had failed. Nothing in the methodology could be blamed, simply the implications of the findings in the study.^[34]

Another part of psychological research that must be considered is that though we yearn for clarity in the psychological world, results are not often clean-cut. Other words, results found in one psychological study are usually not enough to establish a relationship between two factors.^[35] In order to support a hypothesis further, replication studies should be conducted. Alternate hypotheses should also be explored and considered.^[36] However, incentives to conduct replication studies are extremely low, so they do not happen often. When they do happen, they are usually not accepted by publishers.^[35]

The current culture around publishing psychological research promotes almost solely new and appealing research. Replications, negative results, and further research into novel findings are rarely published.^[37] Consequently, to many researchers, it seems that gaining more funds along with a reputation for exciting research has become more important than seeking out the truth.

The peer review process is another aspect of psychological research that has been criticized. Though there are some positive aspects to the peer review process, it is not designed well enough to detect fraud. There are many studies that have passed through several peer reviews that have later been found to be fraudulent.^[36]

See also

• Experimental psychology
• List of psychological research methods
• Natural experiment
• Quantitative psychological research
• Qualitative psychological research
• Scientific method
• Design of experiments
• Sociological research

References

1. Spielman, Rose M.; Dumper, Kathryn; Jenkins, William; Lacombe, Arlene; Lovett, Marilyn; Perlmutter, Marion (Dec 8, 2014). "2 - Psychological Research". Psychology. Houston, Texas: OpenStax.
2. The Office of Human Research Protection. Institutional Review Board Guidebook. "Chapter 3, Section A: Risk/Benefit Analysis." pp. 1-10 [1] Retrieved January 13, 2023
3. "8 CFR 46 - PROTECTION OF HUMAN SUBJECTS: 46.116 General requirements for informed consent". United States Government. Retrieved 2023-01-13.
4. Tolich, Martin (June 2014). "What can Milgram and Zimbardo teach ethics committees and qualitative researchers about minimizing harm?". Research Ethics. 10 (2): 86–96. doi:10.1177/1747016114523771. ISSN 1747-0161.
5. Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary (2nd, rev. and updated ed.). New York: Random House Reference. 2001. pp. 534, 971. ISBN 978-0-375-42566-0.
6. Sugden R (2021-03-01). "Hume's experimental psychology and the idea of erroneous preferences". Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 183: 836–848. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.11.017. ISSN 0167-2681. S2CID 229395880.
7. Feshbach S, Singer RD (1971). Television and Aggression: An Experimental Field Study. The Jossey-Bass behavioral science series. Jossey-Bass. ISBN 978-0-87589-083-8. ERIC ED062791. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
8. Tachibana Y, Hasegawa E (February 1986). "Aggressive responses of adolescents to an hypothetical frustrative situation". Psychological Reports. 58 (1): 111–8. doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.58.1.111. PMID 3961055. S2CID 42652059.
9. Cunningham MR (May 1986). "Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 50 (5): 925–935. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925.
10. Sommer B. . University of California – Davis. Archived from the original on 2014-12-19. Retrieved 2012-07-19.
11. Price P, Oswald K. "Observational Research". California State University, Fresno. Archived from the original on 2012-12-14. Retrieved 2012-07-19.
12. Festinger L, Riecken H, Schachter S (1956). When Prophecy Fails: A Social and Psychological Study of a Modern Group that Predicted the End of the World. University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.1037/10030-000. ISBN 978-1-5154-3079-7.
13. Cherry K. "What Is Naturalistic Observation?". About.com. Retrieved 15 May 2011.
14. (PDF). University of Connecticut. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 September 2011. Retrieved 15 May 2011.
15. Pierce T. "Naturalistic Observation Lecture Notes" (PDF). radford.edu. Retrieved 15 May 2011.
16. Walker IR (January 2011). Reliability in Scientific Research: Improving the Dependability of Measurements, Calculations, Equipment, and Software. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-49335-2.
17. "Descriptive/Correlational Research". CliffsNotes.
18. Babbie E (1989). The Practice of Social Research (5th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth. ISBN 978-0-534-09727-1.
19. Shields PM, Tajalli H (September 2006). "Intermediate theory: The missing link in successful student scholarship". Journal of Public Affairs Education. 12 (3): 313–34. doi:10.1080/15236803.2006.12001438. S2CID 141201197.
20. Thiele C, Laireiter AR, Baumann U (January 2002). "Diaries in clinical psychology and psychotherapy: A selective review". Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 9 (1): 1–37. doi:10.1002/cpp.302.
21. Magai C, McFadden SH (February 1995). The role of emotions in social and personality development: History, theory and research. Emotions, Personality, and Psychotherapy. Vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-306-44866-9.
22. Lassiter GD, Lindberg MJ (March 2010). "Video recording custodial interrogations: Implications of psychological science for policy and practice". The Journal of Psychiatry & Law. 38 (1–2): 177–92. doi:10.1177/009318531003800108. S2CID 146850991.
23. Shepard J, Greene RW (2003). . Ohio: Glencoe McGraw-Hill. pp. A–22. ISBN 978-0-07-828576-9. Archived from the original on 2010-03-08.
24. Yin RK (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Fourth ed.). California: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-6099-1.
25. Christensen LB (1994). Experimental methodology (6th ed.). Needham Heights, MA.: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-205-15506-4.
26. Reynolds, Cecil R.; Fletcher-Janzen, Elaine, eds. (2004). Concise Encyclopedia of Special Education. John Wiley and Sons. p. 428. ISBN 978-0-471-65251-9.
27. Livingston JA (1996). "other selves". In Vitek, William, Jackson, Wes (eds.). Rooted in the land: essays on community and place. Yale University Press. p. 133. ISBN 978-0-300-06961-7.
28. Webb EJ, Campbell DT, Schwartz RD, Sechrest L (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally. ISBN 978-0-528-68694-8. OCLC 924711048.
29. Bradburn NM, Sudman S, Blair E, Locander W, Miles C, Singer E, Stocking C (1979). Improving interview method and questionnaire design: Response effects to threatening questions in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Galbraith, Sally; Bowden, Jack; Mander, Adrian (February 2017). "Accelerated longitudinal designs: An overview of modelling, power, costs and handling missing data". Statistical Methods in Medical Research. 26 (1): 374–398. doi:10.1177/0962280214547150. ISSN 0962-2802. PMC 5302089. PMID 25147228.
31. Ho, D. Y. F., & Wu, M. (2001). Introduction to cross-cultural psychology. In L. L. Adler & U. P. Gielen (Eds.), Cross-cultural topics in psychology (pp. 3–13). Westport, CT: Praeger.
32. Sun, Ron, ed. (2008). The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology (1. publ ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85741-3.
33. Trochim WM. "Unobtrusive Measures". Conjoint.ly.
34. Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2010-09-01). "Can psychology become a science?". Personality and Individual Differences. Collected works from the Festschrift for Tom Bouchard, June 2009: A tribute to a vibrant scientific career. 49 (4): 281–288. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.024. ISSN 0191-8869.
35. Simmons, Joseph P.; Nelson, Leif D.; Simonsohn, Uri (November 2011). "False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant". Psychological Science. 22 (11): 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632. ISSN 0956-7976.
36. Stroebe, Wolfgang; Postmes, Tom; Spears, Russell (November 2012). "Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7 (6): 670–688. doi:10.1177/1745691612460687. ISSN 1745-6916.
37. Nosek, Brian A.; Spies, Jeffrey R.; Motyl, Matt (November 2012). "Scientific Utopia". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7 (6): 615–631. doi:10.1177/1745691612459058. ISSN 1745-6916. PMC 10540222.

Further reading

• Stangor C (2007). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. ISBN 978-0-618-70591-7.
• Weathington BL, Cunningham CJ, Pittenger DP (2010). Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBN 978-1-119-47009-0. OCLC 1003488834.