fbpx
Wikipedia

Little Murders

Little Murders is a 1971 American black comedy film directed by Alan Arkin, in his feature film directorial debut, and starring Elliott Gould and Marcia Rodd.[3] Based on the stage play of the same name by Jules Feiffer, it is the story of a woman, Patsy (Rodd), who brings home her boyfriend, Alfred (Gould), to meet her severely dysfunctional family amidst a series of random shootings, garbage strikes and electrical outages ravaging their New York City neighborhood.

Little Murders
Directed byAlan Arkin
Screenplay byJules Feiffer
Based onLittle Murders
by Jules Feiffer
Produced byJack Brodsky
StarringElliott Gould
Marcia Rodd
Vincent Gardenia
Elizabeth Wilson
Jon Korkes
John Randolph
Doris Roberts
Donald Sutherland
Lou Jacobi
Alan Arkin
CinematographyGordon Willis
Edited byHoward Kuperman
Music byFred Kaz
Color processColor by Deluxe
Production
company
Brodsky-Gould Productions
Distributed by20th Century Fox
Release date
  • February 9, 1971 (1971-02-09)
Running time
108 minutes
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Budget$1.34 million[1]
Box office$1.5 million (rentals)[2]

Plot Edit

Patsy Newquist is a 27-year-old interior designer who lives in a New York City that is rife with street crime, noise, obscene phone calls, power blackouts and unsolved homicides. When she sees a defenseless man being attacked by street thugs, she intervenes, but is surprised when the passive victim doesn't even bother to thank her. She ends up attracted to the man, Alfred Chamberlain, a photographer of excrement, but finds that he is emotionally vacant, barely able to feel pain or pleasure. He permits muggers to beat him up until they get tired and go away.

Patsy is accustomed to "molding" men. Alfred is different. When she brings him home to meet her parents and brother, he is almost non-verbal, except to tell her that he doesn't care for families. He learns that Patsy had another brother who was murdered for no known reason. Patsy's eccentric family is surprised when she announces their intention to wed, then amazed when their marriage ceremony conducted by the existential Rev. Dupas turns into a free-for-all. Determined to discover why her new husband is the way he is, Patsy sends Alfred to Chicago to visit his parents, who he left at 17 years of age, with a questionnaire about his childhood. He records the interview with his parents, in which they deny memory of his childhood.

Alfred ultimately agrees to try to become Patsy's kind of man, the kind willing to "fight back," professes he is able to feel emotions again, and that his first feeling is worship for Patsy. The instant that happens, a sniper's bullet kills Patsy, again for no apparent reason. A blood-splattered Alfred goes to her parents' apartment, New Yorkers barely noticing his state. He descends into a silent stupor, Patsy's father even having to feed him. A ranting, disturbed police detective, Lt. Miles Practice, drops by, almost unable to function due to the number of unsolved murders in the city. After he leaves, Alfred goes for a walk in the park, where he starts to take photographs of a statue and some kids. He returns with a rifle, which he doesn't know how to load. Patsy's father shows him how. Then the two of them, along with Patsy's brother, take turns shooting people down on the street. Upon believing Alfred to have shot Lt. Practice, their mood brightens, and all three men giddily join Patsy's mother for dinner at the table.

Cast Edit

On stage Edit

Development Edit

Feiffer says he was inspired to write the story by the assassination of John F. Kennedy. "Which was odd because I wasn't a big fan of his; he was the first actor in the White House," he said. "And then when Oswald was shot, I thought there is a madness going on. And because of my politics, I saw that madness in Vietnam, too. So the motive of the play was the breakdown of all forms of authority—religion, family, the police. Urban violence was always the metaphor in my mind for something more serious in the country."[4]

Feiffer originally wrote it as a novel. "Having gone to theater a lot and read plays a lot since adolescence, I realized that if I ever wrote the sort of play I wanted to write, it would close in a week. I felt I'd already done my masochistic years at The Village Voice—eight years of cartoons without a penny. But I felt this grim sense of what was going on and I didn't feel the cartoons could express that fully. I also felt the cartoons were being too easily accepted."[4]

Feiffer worked on the novel for two years but was unhappy with it.[5] Then he discovered an original outline for the novel which he thought would make a good play. He wrote a first draft in three weeks. "And I realized that whatever the fate of the play, I was stuck as a playwright. I felt as at home with a play as with the cartoon."[4]

1967 Broadway production Edit

The play was going to have its world premiere at the Yale School of Drama in October 1966.[6] However that ended when there was a chance it would be produced on Broadway. Alexander Cohen eventually got the rights.[7] Stage rights were also optioned by the Aldwych Theatre in London.[8]

The play was staged on Broadway in 1967 with a cast that included Elliott Gould and Barbara Cook and a budget of $100,000. It was directed by George L. Sherman.[9][10]

Reviews were mixed. Walter Kerr said "The comedy comes to a point where it can no longer keep a grin on its face, not even a twisted one. Mr. Feiffer gives over the business of suggesting serious comment from inside a lazy, lunatic stance, and like a too successfully reformed gag man, goes straight."[11][12]

Feiffer called it an "atrocious production" but admits he was involved in all key creative decisions.[13] The play lasted only seven performances.[14] Walter Kerr, who had given the play a mixed review, wrote an article saying the play had promise and that it was a shame the piece could not have been further developed.[15] The fate of the play was given as an example of the lack of critical and producer support given to new American plays on Broadway.[13]

1967 London production Edit

This failure was followed by a successful London production by the Royal Shakespeare Company, directed by Christopher Morahan at the Aldwych Theatre. Reviews were better though not raves and the play was voted by critics as best foreign play of the year.[16] Feiffer said this production "saved my sanity."[13]

1969 Off Broadway production Edit

Ted Mann had the idea of reviving the play off Broadway and hired Alan Arkin to direct. It was revived in 1969 by Circle in the Square in New York City, directed by Arkin with a cast that included Linda Lavin, Vincent Gardenia, and Fred Willard.[17] Feiffer had no creative involvement in the production.[13] The New York Times called the production "fantastically funny."[18] That production ran for 400 performances, and won Feiffer an Obie Award. Lavin won the 1969 Outer Critics Circle Award for Best Performance.

There was also a successful 1969 production in Los Angeles.[19][20]

Arkin directed Feiffer's second play The White House Murder Case.[21]

Film production Edit

Jean-Luc Godard Edit

In January 1969, Elliott Gould announced he had formed his own production company with Jack Brodsky and that they would make two films: The Assistant, from a novel by Bernard Malamud, and Little Murders. Gould said he signed Jean-Luc Godard to direct.[22] United Artists were going to finance and release it, and Robert Benton and David Newman would write the script.[23]

Gould was unhappy with Benton and Newman's script, and Godard's interest waned.[24]

Alan Arkin Edit

Feiffer wrote the script. He added new scenes, including new characters such as Alfred Chamberlain's parents (played by John Randolph and Doris Roberts). Feiffer said "all I've done in the screenplay is change it from a theatre cliche to a movie cliche."[25]

Gould asked Arkin to direct (he had never directed a feature before but had directed two short films and had extensive experience as a theatre director). Arkin was reluctant to return to the material but was persuaded after a series of meetings with Feiffer; he was announced as the director in March 1970.[24][26][27][28][29] Arkin said the film was "about the human condition."[30]

Richard Zanuck, head of Fox, who had made MASH and Move with Gould, agreed to finance the film for $1.4 million. Gould's salary was $200,000, deferred until after the film made a profit.[31]

Shooting Edit

Filming began in April 1970 and finished June 11, $100,000 under budget.[24] "Frankly, I'm scared by what we did," said Arkin, "particularly the last 10 minutes."[24] Feiffer later said "there were all sorts of problems" with Arkin on the film, "although we had worked together very happily on the play. And it was by no means collaborative. He really wanted nothing to do with me. I had very little input into how that movie came out, and some of it is good and some of it isn't." Feiffer said he was not pleased with the film. "I think that's not his fault, entirely, it's also mine. I made compromises on the screenplay that were not his idea, they were my own. I was inexperienced, and they were dumb ideas. But then there were things that were his fault. Some of his casting. The style of the film, which worked very well on stage, but wasn't appropriate for film, I don't think."[32]

Reception Edit

The film was given a limited release to allow critical reception to grow.[24]

Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun-Times gave the film a perfect four stars and wrote, "One of the reasons it works, and is indeed a definitive reflection of America's darker moods, is that it breaks audiences down into isolated individuals, vulnerable and uncertain. Most movies create a temporary sort of democracy, a community of strangers there in the darkened theater. Not this one. The movie seems to be saying that New York City has a similar effect on its citizens, and that it will get you if you don't watch out."[33] Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune also awarded his top grade of four stars and called it "a mean little comedy that made me laugh and then think, 'God, how could I laugh at that.'"[34]

Roger Greenspun of The New York Times wrote, "Essentially 'Little Murders' constructs its world from the point of view of someone sitting behind the locked doors of an apartment on the Upper West Side—and so long as it maintains the conditions of that point of view it works—dramatically, cinematically, whatever way you will. Once it breaks with those conditions it becomes unterrifying, unfunny, superficial, inadequate.But 'Little Murders' usually is funny—in its great harangues and sermons, in its superlative cast, and in Arkin's direct intelligence in handling most of the dramatic moments."[35] Vincent Canby, also writing in the Times, was more positive, calling it "a very funny, very intelligent, very affecting movie."[36][37]

Variety wrote, "Combining comedy with deadly serious comment on the nature of the world is a most difficult undertaking. If the theme is violence, and the design is to create a shattering experience for the audience, the project becomes even more difficult. But Alan Arkin, making a most impressive directorial debut, has surmounted these difficulties brilliantly. He has made a film that is not only funny but devastating in its emotional impact."[38][39]

Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times called the film "brilliantly successful" and "a remarkable debut for Arkin as a movie maker."[40] Gary Arnold of The Washington Post wrote that the film "has good lines and bits of performance (especially by Miss Wilson and Vincent Gardenia as the elder Newquists and Don Sutherland as a hippie minister), but it doesn't have a consistent, unifying point of view."[41]

On Rotten Tomatoes the film had an approval rating of 71% based on reviews from 14 critics.[42]

In popular culture Edit

  • On the album Cowbirds and Cuckoos by Ryland Bouchard there is a song titled "Little Murders."
  • On the popular AMC television show Mad Men, set in the 1960s, the character of Megan Draper auditions for the original stage production.
  • Dave Sim has stated that in his comic book Cerebus, the character of The Judge is based on Lou Jacobi's portrayal from this film.[43]

See also Edit

References Edit

  1. ^ Solomon, Aubrey. Twentieth Century Fox: A Corporate and Financial History (The Scarecrow Filmmakers Series). Lanham, Maryland: Scarecrow Press, 1989. ISBN 978-0-8108-4244-1. p256
  2. ^ Solomon, pg 231.
  3. ^ "Little Murders". Turner Classic Movies. Retrieved April 19, 2016.
  4. ^ a b c Freedman, Samuel G. (1987-05-03). "Theater; Jules Feiffer's West Side Story". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  5. ^ Our Age Of Violence: Feiffer: Our Age of Violence By JULES FEIFFER. New York Times 23 April 1967: 97.
  6. ^ BROADWAY TO GET MUSICAL 'SUNDAY': 1967 Staging of Dassin Film Will Star Miss Mercouri By SAM ZOLOTOW. New York Times 18 May 1966: 41.
  7. ^ BIL BAIRD'S THEATER GETS A HEAD START New York Times 27 July 1966: 44.
  8. ^ The balcony scene--as t'were Coleman, Terry. The Guardian 10 Jan 1967: 7.
  9. ^ Calta, Louis (1967-02-25). "FEIFFER SPOOFS AMERICAN FAMILY; Cartoonist's New Comedy Attacks a Stereotype". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  10. ^ "George L. Sherman". Playbill. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  11. ^ Theater: Feiffer's 'Little Murders': Comedy by Cartoonist Opens at Broadhurst By WALTER KERR. New York Times 26 April 1967: 38.
  12. ^ Feiffer Wit Sharp in 'Little Murders' Glover, William. Los Angeles Times 28 April 1967: e19.
  13. ^ a b c d Feiffer: If at First You . . .: Jules Feiffer: If at First You . . . By TOM BURKE. New York Times 26 January 1969: D1.
  14. ^ 'LITTLE MURDERS' TO CLOSE TONIGHT: Feiffer Play Is Ending After Seven Performances By LOUIS CALTA. New York Times 29 April 1967: 23.
  15. ^ They Might Have Made It: Two Plays That Might Have Made It By WALTER KERR. New York Times 4 June 1967: X1.
  16. ^ A Strike For 'Murders' By MARTIN ESSLIN. New York Times 23 July 1967: 69.
  17. ^ Arkin Staging Feiffer Play New York Times 21 November 1968: 42.
  18. ^ Drama: 'Little Murders' Refuses to Die: Off Broadway Revival Staged by Arkin By CLIVE BARNES. New York Times 6 January 1969: 38.
  19. ^ DRAMA REVIEW: Feiffer's 'Murders' Offered Sullivan, Dan. Los Angeles Times 28 April 1969: g20.
  20. ^ Feiffer Play in 3rd Month at Playhouse Los Angeles Times 30 June 1969: d18.
  21. ^ Barnes, Clive (1970-02-19). "Stage: Jules Feiffer's 'White House Murder Case'". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2020-09-11.
  22. ^ Gould Striving for Super Status Haber, Joyce. Los Angeles Times (8 January 1969: k13.
  23. ^ Godard to Direct 'Little Murders' Film By A. H. WEILER. New York Times 29 May 1969: 50.
  24. ^ a b c d e "'Little Murders': The Ending Even Scares the Director: 'Little Murders' and Madness, Too," by Robert Mottley. The Washington Post and Times-Herald (1959-1973); Washington, D.C. [Washington, D.C]14 Feb 1971: N1.
  25. ^ Jules Feiffer: 'It's Reality That Closes Saturday Night' Sullivan, Dan. Los Angeles Times (1923-1995), 14 February 1971: r1.
  26. ^ Arkin on directing: 'It's magic, but I trust': Leashed tension Dual role Jules Feiffer Antididactic By Louise Sweeney. The Christian Science Monitor 11 July 1970: 4.
  27. ^ 'Go Ahead, Interview Me' By JOSH GREENFELD. New York Times 21 June 1970: 89.
  28. ^ "Interview with Elliott Gould". Groucho Reviews. July 20, 2012.
  29. ^ "Arkin to Direct Film 01 Feiffer's 'Murders' (Published 1970)". The New York Times. 10 March 1970. p. 53.
  30. ^ The Serious and Secret Side of Alan Arkin: Art begins at home for this father, who happens to be a very talented man. Serious, Secret Arkin' Marks, J. Chicago Tribune 23 March 1971: a1.
  31. ^ New Movie Financing Deal Seen New York Times 3 May 1970: 148.
  32. ^ Groth, Gary (February 20, 2011). "The Jules Feiffer Interview". The Comics Journal.
  33. ^ Ebert, Roger. "Little Murders". RogerEbert.com. Retrieved May 3, 2019.
  34. ^ Siskel, Gene (March 31, 1971). "Little Murders". Chicago Tribune. Section 2, p. 6.
  35. ^ Greenspun, Roger (February 10, 1971). "' Little Murders' Is Back As Film Arkin Directed". The New York Times. 34.
  36. ^ Canby, Vincent (February 21, 1971). "What's So Funny? 'Murders'". The New York Times. Section 2, p. 1.
  37. ^ Canby, Vincent (21 February 1971). "What's So Funny? 'Murders' (Published 1971)". The New York Times.
  38. ^ "Film Reviews: Little Murders". Variety. February 3, 1971. 17.
  39. ^ Variety Staff (1 January 1971). "Little Murders". Variety.
  40. ^ Champlin, Charles (February 11, 1971). "'Murders' Revives Fantasy". Los Angeles Times. Part IV, p. 1.
  41. ^ Arnold, Gary (March 13, 1971). "'Little Murders,' Large Flaws". The Washington Post. E6.
  42. ^ "Little Murders". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  43. ^ "A MOMENT OF CEREBUS: Little Murders". A MOMENT OF CEREBUS. 2013-11-25. Retrieved 2020-09-11.

External links Edit

little, murders, this, article, about, 1971, film, 2011, film, little, murder, 2009, series, petits, meurtres, agatha, christie, 1971, american, black, comedy, film, directed, alan, arkin, feature, film, directorial, debut, starring, elliott, gould, marcia, ro. This article is about the 1971 film For the 2011 film see Little Murder For the 2009 TV Series see Les Petits Meurtres d Agatha Christie Little Murders is a 1971 American black comedy film directed by Alan Arkin in his feature film directorial debut and starring Elliott Gould and Marcia Rodd 3 Based on the stage play of the same name by Jules Feiffer it is the story of a woman Patsy Rodd who brings home her boyfriend Alfred Gould to meet her severely dysfunctional family amidst a series of random shootings garbage strikes and electrical outages ravaging their New York City neighborhood Little MurdersDirected byAlan ArkinScreenplay byJules FeifferBased onLittle Murders by Jules FeifferProduced byJack BrodskyStarringElliott Gould Marcia Rodd Vincent Gardenia Elizabeth Wilson Jon Korkes John Randolph Doris Roberts Donald Sutherland Lou Jacobi Alan ArkinCinematographyGordon WillisEdited byHoward KupermanMusic byFred KazColor processColor by DeluxeProductioncompanyBrodsky Gould ProductionsDistributed by20th Century FoxRelease dateFebruary 9 1971 1971 02 09 Running time108 minutesCountryUnited StatesLanguageEnglishBudget 1 34 million 1 Box office 1 5 million rentals 2 Contents 1 Plot 2 Cast 3 On stage 3 1 Development 3 2 1967 Broadway production 3 3 1967 London production 3 4 1969 Off Broadway production 4 Film production 4 1 Jean Luc Godard 4 2 Alan Arkin 4 3 Shooting 5 Reception 6 In popular culture 7 See also 8 References 9 External linksPlot EditPatsy Newquist is a 27 year old interior designer who lives in a New York City that is rife with street crime noise obscene phone calls power blackouts and unsolved homicides When she sees a defenseless man being attacked by street thugs she intervenes but is surprised when the passive victim doesn t even bother to thank her She ends up attracted to the man Alfred Chamberlain a photographer of excrement but finds that he is emotionally vacant barely able to feel pain or pleasure He permits muggers to beat him up until they get tired and go away Patsy is accustomed to molding men Alfred is different When she brings him home to meet her parents and brother he is almost non verbal except to tell her that he doesn t care for families He learns that Patsy had another brother who was murdered for no known reason Patsy s eccentric family is surprised when she announces their intention to wed then amazed when their marriage ceremony conducted by the existential Rev Dupas turns into a free for all Determined to discover why her new husband is the way he is Patsy sends Alfred to Chicago to visit his parents who he left at 17 years of age with a questionnaire about his childhood He records the interview with his parents in which they deny memory of his childhood Alfred ultimately agrees to try to become Patsy s kind of man the kind willing to fight back professes he is able to feel emotions again and that his first feeling is worship for Patsy The instant that happens a sniper s bullet kills Patsy again for no apparent reason A blood splattered Alfred goes to her parents apartment New Yorkers barely noticing his state He descends into a silent stupor Patsy s father even having to feed him A ranting disturbed police detective Lt Miles Practice drops by almost unable to function due to the number of unsolved murders in the city After he leaves Alfred goes for a walk in the park where he starts to take photographs of a statue and some kids He returns with a rifle which he doesn t know how to load Patsy s father shows him how Then the two of them along with Patsy s brother take turns shooting people down on the street Upon believing Alfred to have shot Lt Practice their mood brightens and all three men giddily join Patsy s mother for dinner at the table Cast EditElliott Gould as Alfred Chamberlain Marcia Rodd as Patsy Newquist Vincent Gardenia as Carol Newquist reprising 1969 stage role Elizabeth Wilson as Marjorie Newquist reprising 1969 stage role Jon Korkes as Kenny Newquist replacing David Steinberg from the Broadway production John Randolph as Mr Chamberlain Doris Roberts as Mrs Chamberlain Donald Sutherland as the Rev Henry Dupas Lou Jacobi as Judge Stern Alan Arkin as Lt Miles PracticeOn stage EditDevelopment Edit Feiffer says he was inspired to write the story by the assassination of John F Kennedy Which was odd because I wasn t a big fan of his he was the first actor in the White House he said And then when Oswald was shot I thought there is a madness going on And because of my politics I saw that madness in Vietnam too So the motive of the play was the breakdown of all forms of authority religion family the police Urban violence was always the metaphor in my mind for something more serious in the country 4 Feiffer originally wrote it as a novel Having gone to theater a lot and read plays a lot since adolescence I realized that if I ever wrote the sort of play I wanted to write it would close in a week I felt I d already done my masochistic years at The Village Voice eight years of cartoons without a penny But I felt this grim sense of what was going on and I didn t feel the cartoons could express that fully I also felt the cartoons were being too easily accepted 4 Feiffer worked on the novel for two years but was unhappy with it 5 Then he discovered an original outline for the novel which he thought would make a good play He wrote a first draft in three weeks And I realized that whatever the fate of the play I was stuck as a playwright I felt as at home with a play as with the cartoon 4 1967 Broadway production Edit The play was going to have its world premiere at the Yale School of Drama in October 1966 6 However that ended when there was a chance it would be produced on Broadway Alexander Cohen eventually got the rights 7 Stage rights were also optioned by the Aldwych Theatre in London 8 The play was staged on Broadway in 1967 with a cast that included Elliott Gould and Barbara Cook and a budget of 100 000 It was directed by George L Sherman 9 10 Reviews were mixed Walter Kerr said The comedy comes to a point where it can no longer keep a grin on its face not even a twisted one Mr Feiffer gives over the business of suggesting serious comment from inside a lazy lunatic stance and like a too successfully reformed gag man goes straight 11 12 Feiffer called it an atrocious production but admits he was involved in all key creative decisions 13 The play lasted only seven performances 14 Walter Kerr who had given the play a mixed review wrote an article saying the play had promise and that it was a shame the piece could not have been further developed 15 The fate of the play was given as an example of the lack of critical and producer support given to new American plays on Broadway 13 1967 London production Edit This failure was followed by a successful London production by the Royal Shakespeare Company directed by Christopher Morahan at the Aldwych Theatre Reviews were better though not raves and the play was voted by critics as best foreign play of the year 16 Feiffer said this production saved my sanity 13 1969 Off Broadway production Edit Ted Mann had the idea of reviving the play off Broadway and hired Alan Arkin to direct It was revived in 1969 by Circle in the Square in New York City directed by Arkin with a cast that included Linda Lavin Vincent Gardenia and Fred Willard 17 Feiffer had no creative involvement in the production 13 The New York Times called the production fantastically funny 18 That production ran for 400 performances and won Feiffer an Obie Award Lavin won the 1969 Outer Critics Circle Award for Best Performance There was also a successful 1969 production in Los Angeles 19 20 Arkin directed Feiffer s second play The White House Murder Case 21 Film production EditJean Luc Godard Edit In January 1969 Elliott Gould announced he had formed his own production company with Jack Brodsky and that they would make two films The Assistant from a novel by Bernard Malamud and Little Murders Gould said he signed Jean Luc Godard to direct 22 United Artists were going to finance and release it and Robert Benton and David Newman would write the script 23 Gould was unhappy with Benton and Newman s script and Godard s interest waned 24 Alan Arkin Edit Feiffer wrote the script He added new scenes including new characters such as Alfred Chamberlain s parents played by John Randolph and Doris Roberts Feiffer said all I ve done in the screenplay is change it from a theatre cliche to a movie cliche 25 Gould asked Arkin to direct he had never directed a feature before but had directed two short films and had extensive experience as a theatre director Arkin was reluctant to return to the material but was persuaded after a series of meetings with Feiffer he was announced as the director in March 1970 24 26 27 28 29 Arkin said the film was about the human condition 30 Richard Zanuck head of Fox who had made MASH and Move with Gould agreed to finance the film for 1 4 million Gould s salary was 200 000 deferred until after the film made a profit 31 Shooting Edit Filming began in April 1970 and finished June 11 100 000 under budget 24 Frankly I m scared by what we did said Arkin particularly the last 10 minutes 24 Feiffer later said there were all sorts of problems with Arkin on the film although we had worked together very happily on the play And it was by no means collaborative He really wanted nothing to do with me I had very little input into how that movie came out and some of it is good and some of it isn t Feiffer said he was not pleased with the film I think that s not his fault entirely it s also mine I made compromises on the screenplay that were not his idea they were my own I was inexperienced and they were dumb ideas But then there were things that were his fault Some of his casting The style of the film which worked very well on stage but wasn t appropriate for film I don t think 32 Reception EditThe film was given a limited release to allow critical reception to grow 24 Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun Times gave the film a perfect four stars and wrote One of the reasons it works and is indeed a definitive reflection of America s darker moods is that it breaks audiences down into isolated individuals vulnerable and uncertain Most movies create a temporary sort of democracy a community of strangers there in the darkened theater Not this one The movie seems to be saying that New York City has a similar effect on its citizens and that it will get you if you don t watch out 33 Gene Siskel of the Chicago Tribune also awarded his top grade of four stars and called it a mean little comedy that made me laugh and then think God how could I laugh at that 34 Roger Greenspun of The New York Times wrote Essentially Little Murders constructs its world from the point of view of someone sitting behind the locked doors of an apartment on the Upper West Side and so long as it maintains the conditions of that point of view it works dramatically cinematically whatever way you will Once it breaks with those conditions it becomes unterrifying unfunny superficial inadequate But Little Murders usually is funny in its great harangues and sermons in its superlative cast and in Arkin s direct intelligence in handling most of the dramatic moments 35 Vincent Canby also writing in the Times was more positive calling it a very funny very intelligent very affecting movie 36 37 Variety wrote Combining comedy with deadly serious comment on the nature of the world is a most difficult undertaking If the theme is violence and the design is to create a shattering experience for the audience the project becomes even more difficult But Alan Arkin making a most impressive directorial debut has surmounted these difficulties brilliantly He has made a film that is not only funny but devastating in its emotional impact 38 39 Charles Champlin of the Los Angeles Times called the film brilliantly successful and a remarkable debut for Arkin as a movie maker 40 Gary Arnold of The Washington Post wrote that the film has good lines and bits of performance especially by Miss Wilson and Vincent Gardenia as the elder Newquists and Don Sutherland as a hippie minister but it doesn t have a consistent unifying point of view 41 On Rotten Tomatoes the film had an approval rating of 71 based on reviews from 14 critics 42 In popular culture EditOn the album Cowbirds and Cuckoos by Ryland Bouchard there is a song titled Little Murders On the popular AMC television show Mad Men set in the 1960s the character of Megan Draper auditions for the original stage production Dave Sim has stated that in his comic book Cerebus the character of The Judge is based on Lou Jacobi s portrayal from this film 43 See also EditList of American films of 1971References Edit Solomon Aubrey Twentieth Century Fox A Corporate and Financial History The Scarecrow Filmmakers Series Lanham Maryland Scarecrow Press 1989 ISBN 978 0 8108 4244 1 p256 Solomon pg 231 Little Murders Turner Classic Movies Retrieved April 19 2016 a b c Freedman Samuel G 1987 05 03 Theater Jules Feiffer s West Side Story The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved 2020 09 11 Our Age Of Violence Feiffer Our Age of Violence By JULES FEIFFER New York Times 23 April 1967 97 BROADWAY TO GET MUSICAL SUNDAY 1967 Staging of Dassin Film Will Star Miss Mercouri By SAM ZOLOTOW New York Times 18 May 1966 41 BIL BAIRD S THEATER GETS A HEAD START New York Times 27 July 1966 44 The balcony scene as t were Coleman Terry The Guardian 10 Jan 1967 7 Calta Louis 1967 02 25 FEIFFER SPOOFS AMERICAN FAMILY Cartoonist s New Comedy Attacks a Stereotype The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved 2020 09 11 George L Sherman Playbill Retrieved 2020 09 11 Theater Feiffer s Little Murders Comedy by Cartoonist Opens at Broadhurst By WALTER KERR New York Times 26 April 1967 38 Feiffer Wit Sharp in Little Murders Glover William Los Angeles Times 28 April 1967 e19 a b c d Feiffer If at First You Jules Feiffer If at First You By TOM BURKE New York Times 26 January 1969 D1 LITTLE MURDERS TO CLOSE TONIGHT Feiffer Play Is Ending After Seven Performances By LOUIS CALTA New York Times 29 April 1967 23 They Might Have Made It Two Plays That Might Have Made It By WALTER KERR New York Times 4 June 1967 X1 A Strike For Murders By MARTIN ESSLIN New York Times 23 July 1967 69 Arkin Staging Feiffer Play New York Times 21 November 1968 42 Drama Little Murders Refuses to Die Off Broadway Revival Staged by Arkin By CLIVE BARNES New York Times 6 January 1969 38 DRAMA REVIEW Feiffer s Murders Offered Sullivan Dan Los Angeles Times 28 April 1969 g20 Feiffer Play in 3rd Month at Playhouse Los Angeles Times 30 June 1969 d18 Barnes Clive 1970 02 19 Stage Jules Feiffer s White House Murder Case The New York Times ISSN 0362 4331 Retrieved 2020 09 11 Gould Striving for Super Status Haber Joyce Los Angeles Times 8 January 1969 k13 Godard to Direct Little Murders Film By A H WEILER New York Times 29 May 1969 50 a b c d e Little Murders The Ending Even Scares the Director Little Murders and Madness Too by Robert Mottley The Washington Post and Times Herald 1959 1973 Washington D C Washington D C 14 Feb 1971 N1 Jules Feiffer It s Reality That Closes Saturday Night Sullivan Dan Los Angeles Times 1923 1995 14 February 1971 r1 Arkin on directing It s magic but I trust Leashed tension Dual role Jules Feiffer Antididactic By Louise Sweeney The Christian Science Monitor 11 July 1970 4 Go Ahead Interview Me By JOSH GREENFELD New York Times 21 June 1970 89 Interview with Elliott Gould Groucho Reviews July 20 2012 Arkin to Direct Film 01 Feiffer s Murders Published 1970 The New York Times 10 March 1970 p 53 The Serious and Secret Side of Alan Arkin Art begins at home for this father who happens to be a very talented man Serious Secret Arkin Marks J Chicago Tribune 23 March 1971 a1 New Movie Financing Deal Seen New York Times 3 May 1970 148 Groth Gary February 20 2011 The Jules Feiffer Interview The Comics Journal Ebert Roger Little Murders RogerEbert com Retrieved May 3 2019 Siskel Gene March 31 1971 Little Murders Chicago Tribune Section 2 p 6 Greenspun Roger February 10 1971 Little Murders Is Back As Film Arkin Directed The New York Times 34 Canby Vincent February 21 1971 What s So Funny Murders The New York Times Section 2 p 1 Canby Vincent 21 February 1971 What s So Funny Murders Published 1971 The New York Times Film Reviews Little Murders Variety February 3 1971 17 Variety Staff 1 January 1971 Little Murders Variety Champlin Charles February 11 1971 Murders Revives Fantasy Los Angeles Times Part IV p 1 Arnold Gary March 13 1971 Little Murders Large Flaws The Washington Post E6 Little Murders Rotten Tomatoes Retrieved 15 January 2023 A MOMENT OF CEREBUS Little Murders A MOMENT OF CEREBUS 2013 11 25 Retrieved 2020 09 11 External links EditLittle Murders at IMDb Little Murders 1969 production in the Lortel Archives https www nytimes com 1987 05 07 theater stage little murders jules feiffer s 60 s satire html Review of 1987 New York Revival of play at New York Times Original broadway run at IBDB Review of 1993 Los Angeles Revival of play at Los Angeles Times Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Little Murders amp oldid 1178275372, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.