fbpx
Wikipedia

List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 163

This is a list of cases reported in volume 163 of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1896.

Supreme Court of the United States
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 234 years ago (1789-03-04)
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States, Art. III, § 1
Judge term lengthlife tenure, subject to impeachment and removal
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 163 U.S. edit

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[1] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice).

When the cases in volume 163 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
  Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20, 1888
(41–20)
October 8, 1888

July 4, 1910
(Died)
  Stephen Johnson Field Associate Justice California newly-created seat March 10, 1863
(Acclamation)
May 10, 1863

December 1, 1897
(Retired)
  John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29, 1877
(Acclamation)
December 10, 1877

October 14, 1911
(Died)
  Horace Gray Associate Justice Massachusetts Nathan Clifford December 20, 1881
(51–5)
January 9, 1882

September 15, 1902
(Died)
  David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18, 1889
(53–11)
January 6, 1890

March 28, 1910
(Died)
  Henry Billings Brown Associate Justice Michigan Samuel Freeman Miller December 29, 1890
(Acclamation)
January 5, 1891

May 28, 1906
(Retired)
  George Shiras Jr. Associate Justice Pennsylvania Joseph P. Bradley July 26, 1892
(Acclamation)
October 10, 1892

February 23, 1903
(Retired)
  Edward Douglass White Associate Justice Louisiana Samuel Blatchford February 19, 1894
(Acclamation)
March 12, 1894

December 18, 1910
(Continued as chief justice)
  Rufus W. Peckham Associate Justice New York Howell Edmunds Jackson December 9, 1895
(Acclamation)
January 6, 1896

October 24, 1909
(Died)

Notable cases in 163 U.S. edit

 
1904 caricature of "White" and "Jim Crow" rail cars by John T. McCutcheon

Plessy v. Ferguson edit

Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), is regarded as one of the worst decisions in U.S. Supreme Court history, solidifying the practice of "Jim Crow".[2] It is a landmark decision in which the Court ruled that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality, a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".[3][4] The decision legitimized the many state laws re-establishing racial segregation that had been passed in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction Era (1865–1877). Despite its infamy, the decision itself has never been explicitly overruled.[5] But a series of the Court's later decisions, beginning with the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education—which held that the "separate but equal" doctrine is unconstitutional in the context of public schools and educational facilities—have severely weakened Plessy to the point that it is considered to have been de facto overruled.[6]

Wong Wing v. United States edit

In Wong Wing v. United States, 163 U.S. 228 (1896), the Supreme Court found that the 5th and 6th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution forbid imprisonment without a jury trial for non-citizens convicted of illegal entry to, or presence in, the United States. This case established that non-citizens subject to criminal proceedings are entitled to the same constitutional protections available to citizens. The ruling was issued on the same day as the court upheld racial segregation laws in its infamous Plessy v. Ferguson decision.

Lucas v. United States edit

In Lucas v. United States, 163 U.S. 612 (1896), the Supreme Court held that whether a Negro freedman was a member of the Choctaw Nation was a question of fact for a jury, and his non-Indian status may not be presumed.

Ball v. United States edit

Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662 (1896), is one of the earliest Supreme Court cases interpreting the Double Jeopardy Clause. Departing from the English common law rule, and from early decisions of the state high courts of New York and Massachusetts, the Court held that—under the Double Jeopardy Clause—the insufficiency of an initial indictment did not result in a jeopardy bar of acquittal, as long as the first court had jurisdiction.

Citation style edit

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts. The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the "United States Circuit Courts of Appeals." The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions. The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in volume 163 U.S. edit

Case Name Page & year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower Court Disposition
Western Union T. Co. v. Taggart 1 (1896) Gray none none Ind. affirmed
Farmers' L. & T. Co. v. Chicago, P. & S. Ry. Co. 31 (1896) Brewer none none C.C.W.D. Wis. affirmed
Kirk v. United States 49 (1896) Brown none none Ct. Cl. affirmed
Wiggan v. Conolly 56 (1896) Brewer none none Kan. affirmed
Dibble v. Bellingham B.L. Co. 63 (1896) Fuller none none Wash. dismissed
Cornell v. Green 75 (1896) Gray none Brown C.C.N.D. Ill. dismissed
Lowe v. Kansas 81 (1896) Gray none Brown Kan. affirmed
Northern P.R.R. Co. v. Egeland 93 (1896) Peckham none none 8th Cir. affirmed
Telfener v. Russ 100 (1896) Field none none 5th Cir. rehearing denied
Murray v. Louisiana 101 (1896) Shiras none none La. affirmed
Salina S. Co. v. Salina C.I. Co. 109 (1896) Shiras none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Utah affirmed
Barnitz v. Beverly 118 (1896) Shiras none none Kan. reversed
United States v. Rider 132 (1896) Fuller none none C.C.S.D. Ohio dismissed
Harrison v. United States 140 (1896) Fuller none none N.D. Ala. reversed
Illinois C.R.R. Co. v. Illinois 142 (1896) Gray none none Ill. reversed
Webster v. Daly 155 (1896) Fuller none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. dismissed
Perego v. Dodge 160 (1896) Fuller none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Utah affirmed
Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Mfg. Co 169 (1896) White none none C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Singer Mfg. Co. v. Bent 205 (1896) White none none C.C.N.D. Ill. reversed
Bacon v. Texas 207 (1896) Peckham none none Tex. Civ. App. dismissed
Wong Wing v. United States 228 (1896) Shiras Field Field C.C.E.D. Mich. reversed
United States v. Winchester & P.R.R. Co. 244 (1896) Harlan none none Ct. Cl. reversed
United States v. Laws 258 (1896) Peckham none none 6th Cir. certification
Edwards v. Bates Cnty. 269 (1896) White none none C.C.W.D. Mo. reversed
Hanford v. Davies 273 (1896) Harlan none none C.C.D. Wash. affirmed
Rio Grande W. Ry. Co. v. Leak 280 (1896) Harlan none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Utah affirmed
Knights of Pythias v. Kalinski 289 (1896) Brown none none 5th Cir. affirmed
Hennington v. Georgia 299 (1896) Harlan none Fuller Ga. affirmed
Huntington v. Saunders 319 (1896) Fuller none none 1st Cir. dismissed
Burfenning v. Chicago et al. Ry. Co. 321 (1896) Brewer none none Minn. affirmed
Union Nat'l Bank v. Louisville et al. Ry. Co. 325 (1896) Brewer none none Ill. dismissed
Webster v. Luther 331 (1896) Harlan none none Minn. affirmed
Hilborn v. United States 342 (1896) Brown none none Ct. Cl. affirmed
The Steamer Coquitlam 346 (1896) Harlan none none 9th Cir. certification
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Gentry 353 (1896) Harlan none none 5th Cir. affirmed
Southern P.R.R. Co. v. Tomlinson 369 (1896) Gray none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Ariz. reversed
Talton v. Mayes 376 (1896) White none none C.C.W.D. Ark. affirmed
Meyer v. Richards 385 (1896) White none none C.C.E.D. La. reversed
Bank of Comm. v. Tennessee 416 (1896) Peckham none none Tenn. multiple
United States v. Realty Co. 427 (1896) Peckham none none C.C.E.D. La. affirmed
Black v. Elkhorn M. Co. 445 (1896) Peckham none none 9th Cir. affirmed
Faust v. United States 452 (1896) Shiras none none N.D. Tex. affirmed
Eddy v. Lafayette 456 (1896) Shiras none none 8th Cir. affirmed
Grayson v. Lynch 468 (1896) Brown none none Sup. Ct. Terr. N.M. affirmed
Union P. Ry. Co. v. James 485 (1896) Brewer none none 8th Cir. affirmed
Missouri et al. Ry. Co. v. Cook 491 (1896) Fuller none none Kan. affirmed
United States v. Allen 499 (1896) White none none 9th Cir. reversed
Ward v. Race Horse 504 (1896) White none Brown C.C.D. Wyo. reversed
Indiana v. Kentucky 520 (1896) Fuller none none original boundary set
Plessy v. Ferguson 537 (1896) Brown none Harlan La. affirmed
Union P. Ry. Co. v. Chicago et al. Ry. Co. 564 (1896) Fuller none Shiras 8th Cir. affirmed
Lucas v. United States 612 (1896) Shiras none none C.C.W.D. Ark. reversed
Brown v. Wygant 618 (1896) Shiras none none Sup. Ct. D.C. affirmed
United States v. Perkins 625 (1896) Brown none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
United States v. Fitch 631 (1896) per curiam none none N.Y. Sup. Ct. affirmed
Wiborg v. United States 632 (1896) Fuller none Harlan E.D. Pa. multiple
United States v. Ball 662 (1896) Gray none none C.C.E.D. Tex. multiple

Notes and references edit

  1. ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
  2. ^ Amar (2011), p. 76; Epstein (1995), p. 99.
  3. ^ Nowak & Rotunda (2012), § 18.8(c).
  4. ^ Groves, Harry E. (1951). "Separate but Equal—The Doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson". Phylon. 12 (1): 66–72. doi:10.2307/272323. JSTOR 272323.
  5. ^ Lofgren (1987), pp. 204–05.
  6. ^ Schauer (1997), pp. 279–80.

Sources edit

  • Amar, Akhil Reed (2011). "Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon". Pepperdine Law Review. 39 (1): 75–90.
  • Epstein, Richard A. (1995). Forbidden Grounds: The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-6743-0809-3.
  • Lofgren, Charles A. (1987). The Plessy Case: A Legal-Historical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-505684-6.
  • Nowak, John E.; Rotunda, Ronald D. (2012). Treatise on Constitutional Law: Substance and Procedure (5th ed.). Eagan, Minnesota: West Thomson/Reuters. OCLC 798148265.
  • Schauer, Frederick (1997). "Generality and Equality". Law and Philosophy. 16 (3): 279–97. doi:10.2307/3504874. JSTOR 3504874.

See also edit

External links edit

  • [1] Case reports in volume 163 from Library of Congress
  • [2] Case reports in volume 163 from Court Listener
  • [3] Case reports in volume 163 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School
  • [4] Case reports in volume 163 from Google Scholar
  • [5] Case reports in volume 163 from Justia
  • [6] Case reports in volume 163 from Open Jurist
  • Website of the United States Supreme Court
  • United States Courts website about the Supreme Court
  • National Archives, Records of the Supreme Court of the United States
  • American Bar Association, How Does the Supreme Court Work?
  • The Supreme Court Historical Society

list, united, states, supreme, court, cases, volume, this, list, cases, reported, volume, united, states, reports, decided, supreme, court, united, states, 1896, supreme, court, united, states38, 89056, 00444, 89056, 00444establishedmarch, 1789, years, 1789, l. This is a list of cases reported in volume 163 of United States Reports decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1896 Supreme Court of the United States38 53 26 N 77 00 16 W 38 89056 N 77 00444 W 38 89056 77 00444EstablishedMarch 4 1789 234 years ago 1789 03 04 LocationWashington D C Coordinates38 53 26 N 77 00 16 W 38 89056 N 77 00444 W 38 89056 77 00444Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmationAuthorized byConstitution of the United States Art III 1Judge term lengthlife tenure subject to impeachment and removalNumber of positions9 by statute Websitesupremecourt wbr gov Contents 1 Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 163 U S 2 Notable cases in 163 U S 2 1 Plessy v Ferguson 2 2 Wong Wing v United States 2 3 Lucas v United States 2 4 Ball v United States 3 Citation style 4 List of cases in volume 163 U S 5 Notes and references 6 Sources 7 See also 8 External linksJustices of the Supreme Court at the time of volume 163 U S editSee also List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States See also List of United States Supreme Court justices by time in office See also List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition The Supreme Court is established by Article III Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States which says The judicial Power of the United States shall be vested in one supreme Court The size of the Court is not specified the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six one chief justice and five associate justices 1 Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven nine ten and back to nine justices always including one chief justice When the cases in volume 163 were decided the Court comprised the following nine members Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate Vote Tenure on Supreme Court nbsp Melville Fuller Chief Justice Illinois Morrison Waite July 20 1888 41 20 October 8 1888 July 4 1910 Died nbsp Stephen Johnson Field Associate Justice California newly created seat March 10 1863 Acclamation May 10 1863 December 1 1897 Retired nbsp John Marshall Harlan Associate Justice Kentucky David Davis November 29 1877 Acclamation December 10 1877 October 14 1911 Died nbsp Horace Gray Associate Justice Massachusetts Nathan Clifford December 20 1881 51 5 January 9 1882 September 15 1902 Died nbsp David Josiah Brewer Associate Justice Kansas Stanley Matthews December 18 1889 53 11 January 6 1890 March 28 1910 Died nbsp Henry Billings Brown Associate Justice Michigan Samuel Freeman Miller December 29 1890 Acclamation January 5 1891 May 28 1906 Retired nbsp George Shiras Jr Associate Justice Pennsylvania Joseph P Bradley July 26 1892 Acclamation October 10 1892 February 23 1903 Retired nbsp Edward Douglass White Associate Justice Louisiana Samuel Blatchford February 19 1894 Acclamation March 12 1894 December 18 1910 Continued as chief justice nbsp Rufus W Peckham Associate Justice New York Howell Edmunds Jackson December 9 1895 Acclamation January 6 1896 October 24 1909 Died Notable cases in 163 U S edit nbsp 1904 caricature of White and Jim Crow rail cars by John T McCutcheonPlessy v Ferguson edit Plessy v Ferguson 163 U S 537 1896 is regarded as one of the worst decisions in U S Supreme Court history solidifying the practice of Jim Crow 2 It is a landmark decision in which the Court ruled that racial segregation laws did not violate the U S Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality a doctrine that came to be known as separate but equal 3 4 The decision legitimized the many state laws re establishing racial segregation that had been passed in the American South after the end of the Reconstruction Era 1865 1877 Despite its infamy the decision itself has never been explicitly overruled 5 But a series of the Court s later decisions beginning with the 1954 Brown v Board of Education which held that the separate but equal doctrine is unconstitutional in the context of public schools and educational facilities have severely weakened Plessy to the point that it is considered to have been de facto overruled 6 Wong Wing v United States edit In Wong Wing v United States 163 U S 228 1896 the Supreme Court found that the 5th and 6th Amendments to the U S Constitution forbid imprisonment without a jury trial for non citizens convicted of illegal entry to or presence in the United States This case established that non citizens subject to criminal proceedings are entitled to the same constitutional protections available to citizens The ruling was issued on the same day as the court upheld racial segregation laws in its infamous Plessy v Ferguson decision Lucas v United States edit In Lucas v United States 163 U S 612 1896 the Supreme Court held that whether a Negro freedman was a member of the Choctaw Nation was a question of fact for a jury and his non Indian status may not be presumed Ball v United States edit Ball v United States 163 U S 662 1896 is one of the earliest Supreme Court cases interpreting the Double Jeopardy Clause Departing from the English common law rule and from early decisions of the state high courts of New York and Massachusetts the Court held that under the Double Jeopardy Clause the insufficiency of an initial indictment did not result in a jeopardy bar of acquittal as long as the first court had jurisdiction Citation style editSee also United States district court See also United States circuit court See also United States court of appeals See also United States federal courts Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts which had general trial jurisdiction Circuit Courts which had mixed trial and appellate from the US District Courts jurisdiction and the United States Supreme Court which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts and for certain issues over state courts The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction i e in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court There were one or more federal District Courts and or Circuit Courts in each state territory or other geographical region The Judiciary Act of 1891 created the United States Courts of Appeals and reassigned the jurisdiction of most routine appeals from the district and circuit courts to these appellate courts The Act created nine new courts that were originally known as the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals The new courts had jurisdiction over most appeals of lower court decisions The Supreme Court could review either legal issues that a court of appeals certified or decisions of court of appeals by writ of certiorari Bluebook citation style is used for case names citations and jurisdictions Cir United States Court of Appeals e g 3d Cir United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit C C D United States Circuit Court for the District of e g C C D N J United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey D United States District Court for the District of e g D Mass United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts E Eastern M Middle N Northern S Southern W Western e g C C S D N Y United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York e g M D Ala United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama Ct Cl United States Court of Claims The abbreviation of a state s name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state s judiciary at the time e g Pa Supreme Court of Pennsylvania e g Me Supreme Judicial Court of MaineList of cases in volume 163 U S editSee also Fuller Court Case Name Page amp year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion s Dissenting opinion s Lower Court DispositionWestern Union T Co v Taggart 1 1896 Gray none none Ind affirmedFarmers L amp T Co v Chicago P amp S Ry Co 31 1896 Brewer none none C C W D Wis affirmedKirk v United States 49 1896 Brown none none Ct Cl affirmedWiggan v Conolly 56 1896 Brewer none none Kan affirmedDibble v Bellingham B L Co 63 1896 Fuller none none Wash dismissedCornell v Green 75 1896 Gray none Brown C C N D Ill dismissedLowe v Kansas 81 1896 Gray none Brown Kan affirmedNorthern P R R Co v Egeland 93 1896 Peckham none none 8th Cir affirmedTelfener v Russ 100 1896 Field none none 5th Cir rehearing deniedMurray v Louisiana 101 1896 Shiras none none La affirmedSalina S Co v Salina C I Co 109 1896 Shiras none none Sup Ct Terr Utah affirmedBarnitz v Beverly 118 1896 Shiras none none Kan reversedUnited States v Rider 132 1896 Fuller none none C C S D Ohio dismissedHarrison v United States 140 1896 Fuller none none N D Ala reversedIllinois C R R Co v Illinois 142 1896 Gray none none Ill reversedWebster v Daly 155 1896 Fuller none none C C S D N Y dismissedPerego v Dodge 160 1896 Fuller none none Sup Ct Terr Utah affirmedSinger Mfg Co v June Mfg Co 169 1896 White none none C C N D Ill reversedSinger Mfg Co v Bent 205 1896 White none none C C N D Ill reversedBacon v Texas 207 1896 Peckham none none Tex Civ App dismissedWong Wing v United States 228 1896 Shiras Field Field C C E D Mich reversedUnited States v Winchester amp P R R Co 244 1896 Harlan none none Ct Cl reversedUnited States v Laws 258 1896 Peckham none none 6th Cir certificationEdwards v Bates Cnty 269 1896 White none none C C W D Mo reversedHanford v Davies 273 1896 Harlan none none C C D Wash affirmedRio Grande W Ry Co v Leak 280 1896 Harlan none none Sup Ct Terr Utah affirmedKnights of Pythias v Kalinski 289 1896 Brown none none 5th Cir affirmedHennington v Georgia 299 1896 Harlan none Fuller Ga affirmedHuntington v Saunders 319 1896 Fuller none none 1st Cir dismissedBurfenning v Chicago et al Ry Co 321 1896 Brewer none none Minn affirmedUnion Nat l Bank v Louisville et al Ry Co 325 1896 Brewer none none Ill dismissedWebster v Luther 331 1896 Harlan none none Minn affirmedHilborn v United States 342 1896 Brown none none Ct Cl affirmedThe Steamer Coquitlam 346 1896 Harlan none none 9th Cir certificationTexas amp P Ry Co v Gentry 353 1896 Harlan none none 5th Cir affirmedSouthern P R R Co v Tomlinson 369 1896 Gray none none Sup Ct Terr Ariz reversedTalton v Mayes 376 1896 White none none C C W D Ark affirmedMeyer v Richards 385 1896 White none none C C E D La reversedBank of Comm v Tennessee 416 1896 Peckham none none Tenn multipleUnited States v Realty Co 427 1896 Peckham none none C C E D La affirmedBlack v Elkhorn M Co 445 1896 Peckham none none 9th Cir affirmedFaust v United States 452 1896 Shiras none none N D Tex affirmedEddy v Lafayette 456 1896 Shiras none none 8th Cir affirmedGrayson v Lynch 468 1896 Brown none none Sup Ct Terr N M affirmedUnion P Ry Co v James 485 1896 Brewer none none 8th Cir affirmedMissouri et al Ry Co v Cook 491 1896 Fuller none none Kan affirmedUnited States v Allen 499 1896 White none none 9th Cir reversedWard v Race Horse 504 1896 White none Brown C C D Wyo reversedIndiana v Kentucky 520 1896 Fuller none none original boundary setPlessy v Ferguson 537 1896 Brown none Harlan La affirmedUnion P Ry Co v Chicago et al Ry Co 564 1896 Fuller none Shiras 8th Cir affirmedLucas v United States 612 1896 Shiras none none C C W D Ark reversedBrown v Wygant 618 1896 Shiras none none Sup Ct D C affirmedUnited States v Perkins 625 1896 Brown none none N Y Sup Ct affirmedUnited States v Fitch 631 1896 per curiam none none N Y Sup Ct affirmedWiborg v United States 632 1896 Fuller none Harlan E D Pa multipleUnited States v Ball 662 1896 Gray none none C C E D Tex multipleNotes and references edit Supreme Court Research Guide Georgetown Law Library Retrieved April 7 2021 Amar 2011 p 76 Epstein 1995 p 99 Nowak amp Rotunda 2012 18 8 c Groves Harry E 1951 Separate but Equal The Doctrine of Plessy v Ferguson Phylon 12 1 66 72 doi 10 2307 272323 JSTOR 272323 Lofgren 1987 pp 204 05 Schauer 1997 pp 279 80 Sources editAmar Akhil Reed 2011 Plessy v Ferguson and the Anti Canon Pepperdine Law Review 39 1 75 90 Epstein Richard A 1995 Forbidden Grounds The Case Against Employment Discrimination Laws Cambridge Massachusetts Harvard University Press ISBN 0 6743 0809 3 Lofgren Charles A 1987 The Plessy Case A Legal Historical Interpretation New York Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 505684 6 Nowak John E Rotunda Ronald D 2012 Treatise on Constitutional Law Substance and Procedure 5th ed Eagan Minnesota West Thomson Reuters OCLC 798148265 Schauer Frederick 1997 Generality and Equality Law and Philosophy 16 3 279 97 doi 10 2307 3504874 JSTOR 3504874 See also editCertificate of divisionExternal links edit 1 Case reports in volume 163 from Library of Congress 2 Case reports in volume 163 from Court Listener 3 Case reports in volume 163 from the Caselaw Access Project of Harvard Law School 4 Case reports in volume 163 from Google Scholar 5 Case reports in volume 163 from Justia 6 Case reports in volume 163 from Open Jurist Website of the United States Supreme Court United States Courts website about the Supreme Court National Archives Records of the Supreme Court of the United States American Bar Association How Does the Supreme Court Work The Supreme Court Historical SocietyPortal nbsp Law Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title List of United States Supreme Court cases volume 163 amp oldid 1180575137, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.