In linguistics, an intensifier (abbreviatedINT) is a lexical category (but not a traditional part of speech) for a modifier that makes no contribution to the propositional meaning of a clause but serves to enhance and give additional emotional context to the word it modifies. Intensifiers are grammatical expletives, specifically expletive attributives (or, equivalently, attributive expletives or attributive-only expletives; they also qualify as expressive attributives), because they function as semantically vacuous filler. Characteristically, English draws intensifiers from a class of words called degree modifiers, words that quantify the idea they modify. More specifically, they derive from a group of words called adverbs of degree, also known as degree adverbs. When used grammatically as intensifiers, these words cease to be degree adverbs, because they no longer quantify the idea they modify; instead, they emphasize it emotionally. By contrast, the words moderately, slightly, and barely are degree adverbs, but not intensifiers. The other hallmark of prototypical intensifiers is that they are adverbs which lack the primary characteristic of adverbs: the ability to modify verbs. Intensifiers modify exclusively adjectives and adverbs, but this rule is insufficient to classify intensifiers, since there exist other words commonly classified as adverbs that never modify verbs but are not intensifiers, e.g. questionably.
For these reasons, Huddleston argues that intensifier not be recognized as a primary grammatical or lexical category.[1] Intensifier is a category with grammatical properties, but insufficiently defined unless its functional significance is also described (what Huddleston calls a notional definition[2]).
Technically, intensifiers roughly qualify a point on the affectivesemantic property, which is gradable. Syntactically, intensifiers pre-modify either adjectives or adverbs. Semantically, they increase the emotional content of an expression. The basic intensifier is very. A versatile word, English permits very to modify adjectives and adverbs, but not verbs. Other intensifiers often express the same intention as very.
Not all intensifiers are the same syntactically since they vary on whether they can be used attributively or predicatively. For example, really and super can be used in both ways:[3]
a. The car is really expensive. - Predicative intensifier
b. the really expensive car - Attributive intensifier
a. Today was super cold. - Predicative intensifier
b. a super cold day - Attributive intensifier
Words such as so can occur only as predicative intensifiers,[3] and others, such as -ass, typically are used only as attributive intensifiers:[4]
a. The car is so expensive. - Predicative intensifier
b. *the so expensive car - Attributive intensifier (not grammatical)
a. *Today was cold-ass. - Predicative intensifier (not grammatical)[note 1]
b. a cold-ass day - Attributive intensifier
There is dialectal variation in the "correctness" of certain forms.
Illocutionary forceedit
Use of an intensifier subtly suggests to the reader or listener what emotion he should feel. By naming an emotion within the predicate, the writer compels the reader to consider this emotion and hence he begins to feel it.[5]
Persuasiveness and credibilityedit
Legaledit
In general, overuse of intensifiers negatively affects the persuasiveness or credibility of a legal argument.[6] However, if a judge's authoritative written opinion uses a high rate of intensifiers, a lawyer's written appeal of that opinion that also uses a high rate of intensifiers is associated with an increase in favorable outcomes for such appeals. Also, when judges disagree with each other in writing, they tend to use more intensifiers.[citation needed]
Businessedit
A 2010 Stanford Graduate School of Business study[7] found that, in quarterly earnings conference calls, deceptive CEOs use a greater percent quantity of "extreme positive emotions words" than do CEOs telling the truth.[8][9] That finding agrees with the presumption that CEOs attempting to hide poor performance exert themselves more forcefully to persuade their listeners. David F. Larcker and Zakolyukinaz give a list of 115 extreme positive emotions words, including intensifiers: awful, deucedly, emphatically, excellently, fabulously, fantastically, genuinely, gloriously, immensely, incredibly, insanely, keenly, madly, magnificently, marvelously, splendidly, supremely, terrifically, truly, unquestionably, wonderfully, very [good].
A 2013 Forbes Magazine article[10] about counterproductive modes of expression in English specifically discouraged use of really and observed that it provokes doubt and degrades the speaker's credibility: "'Really' – Finder calls this a 'poor attempt to instill candor and truthfulness' that makes clients and coworkers question whether you're really telling the truth."
The narrator. It is easy to tell whether a narrator is narrating because the subject matter interests him or because he wants to evoke interest through his narrative. If the latter is the case, he will exaggerate, use superlatives, etc. Then he usually narrates the worse, because he is not thinking so much about the story as about himself.[11][12]
A quote often attributed to Mark Twain but probably by newspaper editor William Allen White is "Substitute 'damn' every time you're inclined to write 'very'; your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be."[13]
^ abTagliamonte, Sali A. (2012). Variationist Sociolinguistics. UK: Wiley-Blackwell. p.9
^Zimmer, Ben. "Can "[adjective]-ass" occur predicatively?". Retrieved 10 March 2014.
^Straker, David (2010). Changing Minds: in Detail. Syque Press.
^Lance N. Long and William F. Christensen (Fall 2008). "Using Intensifiers is Very Bad – Or is it?". Idaho Law Review. SSRN 1138084. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^David F. Larcker and Anastasia A. Zakolyukinaz (July 2010). "Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls" (PDF). Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
^Stock, Kyle (August 11, 2010). "How Can You Tell If A CEO Is Lying?". Wall Street Journal. New York, NY. Retrieved 2010-08-20.
^Sutton, Bob (August 24, 2010). "How To Tell If The Boss Is Lying". Work Matters (blog). Psychology Today. Retrieved 2010-08-25.
^. Forbes. New York, NY. October 5, 2013. Archived from the original on October 5, 2013. Retrieved 2013-10-31.
^O’Toole, Garson (2012-08-29). "Advice: Substitute 'Damn' Every Time You're Inclined to Write 'Very'". Quote Investigator. Retrieved 2021-09-09.
External linksedit
Modifying Meaning: Intensifiers
October 31, 2023
intensifier, linguistics, intensifier, abbreviated, lexical, category, traditional, part, speech, modifier, that, makes, contribution, propositional, meaning, clause, serves, enhance, give, additional, emotional, context, word, modifies, grammatical, expletive. In linguistics an intensifier abbreviated INT is a lexical category but not a traditional part of speech for a modifier that makes no contribution to the propositional meaning of a clause but serves to enhance and give additional emotional context to the word it modifies Intensifiers are grammatical expletives specifically expletive attributives or equivalently attributive expletives or attributive only expletives they also qualify as expressive attributives because they function as semantically vacuous filler Characteristically English draws intensifiers from a class of words called degree modifiers words that quantify the idea they modify More specifically they derive from a group of words called adverbs of degree also known as degree adverbs When used grammatically as intensifiers these words cease to be degree adverbs because they no longer quantify the idea they modify instead they emphasize it emotionally By contrast the words moderately slightly and barely are degree adverbs but not intensifiers The other hallmark of prototypical intensifiers is that they are adverbs which lack the primary characteristic of adverbs the ability to modify verbs Intensifiers modify exclusively adjectives and adverbs but this rule is insufficient to classify intensifiers since there exist other words commonly classified as adverbs that never modify verbs but are not intensifiers e g questionably For these reasons Huddleston argues that intensifier not be recognized as a primary grammatical or lexical category 1 Intensifier is a category with grammatical properties but insufficiently defined unless its functional significance is also described what Huddleston calls a notional definition 2 Technically intensifiers roughly qualify a point on the affective semantic property which is gradable Syntactically intensifiers pre modify either adjectives or adverbs Semantically they increase the emotional content of an expression The basic intensifier is very A versatile word English permits very to modify adjectives and adverbs but not verbs Other intensifiers often express the same intention as very Contents 1 Examples of English intensifiers 2 Syntax 3 Illocutionary force 4 Persuasiveness and credibility 4 1 Legal 4 2 Business 5 Quotes 6 See also 7 Notes 8 References 9 External linksExamples of English intensifiers editamazingly ass as in a sweet ass ride astoundingly awful as in awful good bare as in bare jokes slang bloody as in bloody hell crazy dead as in dead sexy or dead wrong dreadfully colossally especially exceptionally excessively extremely extraordinarily fantastically frightfully fucking as in fucking awesome fully hella slang incredibly insanely literally mad slang mightily most as in Most Reverend outrageously phenomenally precious as in precious little quite radically rather real as in real nice really remarkably ridiculously right sick so see also so sentence closer somewhat strikingly super supremely surpassingly terribly terrifically too totally veritable very wicked regional Syntax editNot all intensifiers are the same syntactically since they vary on whether they can be used attributively or predicatively For example really and super can be used in both ways 3 a The car is really expensive Predicative intensifier b the really expensive car Attributive intensifier a Today was super cold Predicative intensifier b a super cold day Attributive intensifier dd Words such as so can occur only as predicative intensifiers 3 and others such as ass typically are used only as attributive intensifiers 4 a The car is so expensive Predicative intensifier b the so expensive car Attributive intensifier not grammatical a Today was cold ass Predicative intensifier not grammatical note 1 b a cold ass day Attributive intensifier dd There is dialectal variation in the correctness of certain forms Illocutionary force editUse of an intensifier subtly suggests to the reader or listener what emotion he should feel By naming an emotion within the predicate the writer compels the reader to consider this emotion and hence he begins to feel it 5 Persuasiveness and credibility editLegal edit In general overuse of intensifiers negatively affects the persuasiveness or credibility of a legal argument 6 However if a judge s authoritative written opinion uses a high rate of intensifiers a lawyer s written appeal of that opinion that also uses a high rate of intensifiers is associated with an increase in favorable outcomes for such appeals Also when judges disagree with each other in writing they tend to use more intensifiers citation needed Business edit A 2010 Stanford Graduate School of Business study 7 found that in quarterly earnings conference calls deceptive CEOs use a greater percent quantity of extreme positive emotions words than do CEOs telling the truth 8 9 That finding agrees with the presumption that CEOs attempting to hide poor performance exert themselves more forcefully to persuade their listeners David F Larcker and Zakolyukinaz give a list of 115 extreme positive emotions words including intensifiers awful deucedly emphatically excellently fabulously fantastically genuinely gloriously immensely incredibly insanely keenly madly magnificently marvelously splendidly supremely terrifically truly unquestionably wonderfully very good A 2013 Forbes Magazine article 10 about counterproductive modes of expression in English specifically discouraged use of really and observed that it provokes doubt and degrades the speaker s credibility Really Finder calls this a poor attempt to instill candor and truthfulness that makes clients and coworkers question whether you re really telling the truth Quotes editPhilosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Human All Too Human 1878 wrote The narrator It is easy to tell whether a narrator is narrating because the subject matter interests him or because he wants to evoke interest through his narrative If the latter is the case he will exaggerate use superlatives etc Then he usually narrates the worse because he is not thinking so much about the story as about himself 11 12 A quote often attributed to Mark Twain but probably by newspaper editor William Allen White is Substitute damn every time you re inclined to write very your editor will delete it and the writing will be just as it should be 13 See also editComparison grammar Do support Intensive pronoun Intensive word form So sentence closer Notes edit The exception is badass which appears to be the source of this intensifier rather than an instance of it References edit Huddleston Rodney D Pullum Geoffrey K 2002 6 Adjectives and Adverbs The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language 1 ed Cambridge England Cambridge University Press p 585 footnote ISBN 0 521 43146 8 Huddleston Rodney D 1988 1 Preliminaries English Grammar An Outline 1 ed Cambridge England Cambridge University Press p 4 ISBN 0 521 31152 7 a b Tagliamonte Sali A 2012 Variationist Sociolinguistics UK Wiley Blackwell p 9 Zimmer Ben Can adjective ass occur predicatively Retrieved 10 March 2014 Straker David 2010 Changing Minds in Detail Syque Press Lance N Long and William F Christensen Fall 2008 Using Intensifiers is Very Bad Or is it Idaho Law Review SSRN 1138084 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help David F Larcker and Anastasia A Zakolyukinaz July 2010 Detecting Deceptive Discussions in Conference Calls PDF Stanford Rock Center for Corporate Governance a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Stock Kyle August 11 2010 How Can You Tell If A CEO Is Lying Wall Street Journal New York NY Retrieved 2010 08 20 Sutton Bob August 24 2010 How To Tell If The Boss Is Lying Work Matters blog Psychology Today Retrieved 2010 08 25 10 Words To Erase From Your Vocabulary Forbes New York NY October 5 2013 Archived from the original on October 5 2013 Retrieved 2013 10 31 Human All Too Human 343 Zimmern Helen translator 1909 6 Man in Society Human All Too Human London England Wordsworth Editions Limited p 174 ISBN 978 1 84022 083 4 Archived from the original on 2012 03 25 Retrieved 2011 06 13 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a first has generic name help O Toole Garson 2012 08 29 Advice Substitute Damn Every Time You re Inclined to Write Very Quote Investigator Retrieved 2021 09 09 External links editModifying Meaning Intensifiers Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Intensifier amp oldid 1178232580, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
