fbpx
Wikipedia

Heterostyly

Heterostyly is a unique form of polymorphism and herkogamy in flowers. In a heterostylous species, two or three morphological types of flowers, termed "morphs", exist in the population. On each individual plant, all flowers share the same morph. The flower morphs differ in the lengths of the pistil and stamens, and these traits are not continuous. The morph phenotype is genetically linked to genes responsible for a unique system of self-incompatibility, termed heteromorphic self-incompatibility, that is, the pollen from a flower on one morph cannot fertilize another flower of the same morph.

Flowers of Primula vulgaris
long-styled flower
short-styled flower
Dissection of long-styled (A) and short-styled (B) flowers:
  1. Corolla (petals)
  2. Calyx (sepals)
  3. Stamen
  4. Pistil

Heterostylous plants having two flower morphs are termed "distylous". In one morph (termed "pin", "longistylous", or "long-styled" flower) the stamens are short and the pistils are long; in the second morph (termed "thrum", "brevistylous", or "short-styled" flower) the stamens are long and the pistils are short; the length of the pistil in one morph equals the length of the stamens in the second morph, and vice versa.[1][2] Examples of distylous plants are the primrose and many other Primula species,[1][2] buckwheat, flax and other Linum species, some Lythrum species,[3] and many species of Cryptantha.[4]

Heterostylous plants having three flower morphs are termed "tristylous". Each morph has two types of stamens. In one morph, the pistil is short, and the stamens are long and intermediate; in the second morph, the pistil is intermediate, and the stamens are short and long; in the third morph, the pistil is long, and the stamens are short and intermediate. Oxalis pes-caprae, purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and some other species of Lythrum are trimorphic.[3]

The lengths of stamens and pistils in heterostylous flowers are adapted for pollination by different pollinators, or different body parts of the same pollinator. Thus, pollen originating in a long stamen will reach primarily long rather than short pistils, and vice versa.[1][2] When pollen is transferred between two flowers of the same morph, no fertilization will take place, because of the self-incompatibility mechanism, unless such mechanism is broken by environmental factors such as flower age or temperature.[5]

Evolution of heterostyly edit

 
Eichhornia azurea is an example of distyly present in a family that exhibits other morphs

Heterostyly has evolved independently in over 25 different plant families, including the Oxalidaceae, Primulaceae, Pontederiaceae, and the Boraginaceae.[6][7] These families do not exhibit heterostyly across all species, and some families can exhibit both mating systems, such as among species in the genus Eichhornia (Pontederiaceae). For example, Eichhornia azurea exhibits distyly, whereas another species in the same genus, Eichhornia crassipes, is tristylous.[8]

 
Eichhornia crassipes exhibits tristyly present in a family that exhibits other morphs

Heterostyly is thought to have evolved primarily as a mechanism to promote outcrossing. Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the repeated independent evolution of heterostyly as opposed to homostylous self-incompatibility: 1) that heterostyly has evolved as a mechanism to reduce male gamete wastage on incompatible stigmas and to increase fitness through male function through reciprocal herkogamy; 2) heterostyly evolved as a consequence of selection for heteromorphic self-incompatibility between floral morphs in distylous and tristylous species; and, 3) that the presence of heterostyly in plants reduces the conflict that might occur between the pollen dispersal and pollen receipt functions of the flower in a homomorphic animal-pollinated species.[9]

Heterostyly is most often seen in actinomorphic flowers presumably because zygomorphic flowers are effective in cross- pollination.[9]

Models

Current models for evolution include the pollen transfer model and the selfing avoidance model.

The pollen transfer model proposed by Lloyd and Webb in 1992 is based on the efficacy of cross-pollen transfer, and suggests that the physical trait of reciprocal herkogamy evolved first, and then the diallelic incompatibility arose afterwards as a response to the evolution of the reciprocal herkogamy.[6] This model is similar to Darwin's 1877 idea that reciprocal herkogamy evolved as a direct response to the selective forces that increase accuracy of pollen transfer.[10]

The alternative model - the selfing avoidance model - was introduced by Charlesworth and Charlesworth in 1979 using a population genetic approach. The selfing avoidance model assumes that the self-incompatibility system was the first trait to evolve and that the physical attribute of reciprocal herkogamy evolved as a response to the former.[11]

Genetic determination

The supergene model describes how the distinctive floral traits present in distylous flowers can be inherited. This model was first introduced by Ernst in 1955 and was further elaborated by Charlesworth and Charlesworth in 1979. Lewis and Jones in 1992 demonstrated that the supergene consists of three linked diallelic loci.[11][12][13] The G locus is responsible for determining the characteristic of the gynoecium which includes the style length and incompatibility responses, the P locus determines the pollen size and the pollen's incompatibility responses, and finally the A locus determines the anther height. These three diallelic loci compose the S allele and the s alleles segregating at the supergene S locus, which is notated as GPA and gpa, respectively. There have been other propositions that there are possibly 9 loci responsible for the distyly supergene in Primula, but there has been no convincing genetic data to support this.

Additionally, supergene control is implied for tristyly, but there is no genetic evidence available to support it. A supergene model for tristyly would require the occurrence of two supergenes at the S and M  loci.[9]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c Charles Darwin (1862). "On the two forms, or dimorphic condition, in the species of Primula, and on their remarkable sexual relations". Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society (Botany). 6 (22): 77–96. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1862.tb01218.x.
  2. ^ a b c Charles Darwin (1877). The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. London: Murray.
  3. ^ a b P. H. Barrett, ed. (1977). The collected papers of Charles Darwin. Chicago University Press.
  4. ^ Arthur Cronquist; Arthur H. Holmgren; Noel H. Holmgren; James L. Reveal; Patricia K. Holmgren (1984). Subclass Asteridae (except Asteraceae). Intermountain Flora; Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West, U.S.A. Vol. 4. The New York Botanical Garden. p. 224. ISBN 0-89327-248-5.
  5. ^ Franklin-Tong, Vernonica E. (2008). Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants Evolution, Diversity, and Mechanisms. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68486-2. hdl:1893/1157. ISBN 978-3-540-68485-5.
  6. ^ a b Lloyd, D. G.; Webb, C. J. (1992), "The Evolution of Heterostyly", Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 15, pp. 151–178, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_6, ISBN 978-3-642-86658-6
  7. ^ Vuilleumier, Beryl S. (1967). "The Origin and Evolutionary Development of Heterostyly in the Angiosperms". Evolution. 21 (2): 210–226. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb00150.x. PMID 28556125.
  8. ^ Mulcahy, David L. (1975). "The Reproductive Biology of Eichhornia crassipes (Pontederiaceae)". Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 102 (1): 18–21. doi:10.2307/2484592. JSTOR 2484592.
  9. ^ a b c Barrett, S. C. H.; Shore, J. S. (2008), "New Insights on Heterostyly: Comparative Biology, Ecology and Genetics", Self-Incompatibility in Flowering Plants, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 3–32, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68486-2_1, ISBN 978-3-540-68485-5
  10. ^ Darwin, Charles (2010). The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511731419. hdl:2027/coo.31924000539431. ISBN 9780511731419. Retrieved 2020-05-26. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  11. ^ a b Charlesworth, D.; Charlesworth, B. (1979). "A Model for the Evolution of Distyly". The American Naturalist. 114 (4): 467–498. doi:10.1086/283496. ISSN 0003-0147. S2CID 85285185.
  12. ^ Ernst, Alfred (1955). "Self-fertility in monomorphic Primulas". Genetica. 27 (1): 391–448. doi:10.1007/bf01664170. ISSN 0016-6707. S2CID 40422115.
  13. ^ Lewis, D.; Jones, D. A. (1992), "The Genetics of Heterostyly", Evolution and Function of Heterostyly, Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, vol. 15, pp. 129–150, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-86656-2_5, ISBN 978-3-642-86658-6

External links edit

  • Lloyd, D.; Webb, C.; Dulberger, R. (1990). "Heterostyly in species of Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae) and Hugonia (Linaceae) and other disputed cases". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 172 (1/4): 215–227. doi:10.1007/BF00937808. JSTOR 23674709. S2CID 44876403.

heterostyly, unique, form, polymorphism, herkogamy, flowers, heterostylous, species, three, morphological, types, flowers, termed, morphs, exist, population, each, individual, plant, flowers, share, same, morph, flower, morphs, differ, lengths, pistil, stamens. Heterostyly is a unique form of polymorphism and herkogamy in flowers In a heterostylous species two or three morphological types of flowers termed morphs exist in the population On each individual plant all flowers share the same morph The flower morphs differ in the lengths of the pistil and stamens and these traits are not continuous The morph phenotype is genetically linked to genes responsible for a unique system of self incompatibility termed heteromorphic self incompatibility that is the pollen from a flower on one morph cannot fertilize another flower of the same morph Flowers of Primula vulgarislong styled flowershort styled flowerDissection of long styled A and short styled B flowers Corolla petals Calyx sepals StamenPistil Heterostylous plants having two flower morphs are termed distylous In one morph termed pin longistylous or long styled flower the stamens are short and the pistils are long in the second morph termed thrum brevistylous or short styled flower the stamens are long and the pistils are short the length of the pistil in one morph equals the length of the stamens in the second morph and vice versa 1 2 Examples of distylous plants are the primrose and many other Primula species 1 2 buckwheat flax and other Linum species some Lythrum species 3 and many species of Cryptantha 4 Heterostylous plants having three flower morphs are termed tristylous Each morph has two types of stamens In one morph the pistil is short and the stamens are long and intermediate in the second morph the pistil is intermediate and the stamens are short and long in the third morph the pistil is long and the stamens are short and intermediate Oxalis pes caprae purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria and some other species of Lythrum are trimorphic 3 The lengths of stamens and pistils in heterostylous flowers are adapted for pollination by different pollinators or different body parts of the same pollinator Thus pollen originating in a long stamen will reach primarily long rather than short pistils and vice versa 1 2 When pollen is transferred between two flowers of the same morph no fertilization will take place because of the self incompatibility mechanism unless such mechanism is broken by environmental factors such as flower age or temperature 5 Evolution of heterostyly edit nbsp Eichhornia azurea is an example of distyly present in a family that exhibits other morphsHeterostyly has evolved independently in over 25 different plant families including the Oxalidaceae Primulaceae Pontederiaceae and the Boraginaceae 6 7 These families do not exhibit heterostyly across all species and some families can exhibit both mating systems such as among species in the genus Eichhornia Pontederiaceae For example Eichhornia azurea exhibits distyly whereas another species in the same genus Eichhornia crassipes is tristylous 8 nbsp Eichhornia crassipes exhibits tristyly present in a family that exhibits other morphsHeterostyly is thought to have evolved primarily as a mechanism to promote outcrossing Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the repeated independent evolution of heterostyly as opposed to homostylous self incompatibility 1 that heterostyly has evolved as a mechanism to reduce male gamete wastage on incompatible stigmas and to increase fitness through male function through reciprocal herkogamy 2 heterostyly evolved as a consequence of selection for heteromorphic self incompatibility between floral morphs in distylous and tristylous species and 3 that the presence of heterostyly in plants reduces the conflict that might occur between the pollen dispersal and pollen receipt functions of the flower in a homomorphic animal pollinated species 9 Heterostyly is most often seen in actinomorphic flowers presumably because zygomorphic flowers are effective in cross pollination 9 ModelsCurrent models for evolution include the pollen transfer model and the selfing avoidance model The pollen transfer model proposed by Lloyd and Webb in 1992 is based on the efficacy of cross pollen transfer and suggests that the physical trait of reciprocal herkogamy evolved first and then the diallelic incompatibility arose afterwards as a response to the evolution of the reciprocal herkogamy 6 This model is similar to Darwin s 1877 idea that reciprocal herkogamy evolved as a direct response to the selective forces that increase accuracy of pollen transfer 10 The alternative model the selfing avoidance model was introduced by Charlesworth and Charlesworth in 1979 using a population genetic approach The selfing avoidance model assumes that the self incompatibility system was the first trait to evolve and that the physical attribute of reciprocal herkogamy evolved as a response to the former 11 Genetic determinationThe supergene model describes how the distinctive floral traits present in distylous flowers can be inherited This model was first introduced by Ernst in 1955 and was further elaborated by Charlesworth and Charlesworth in 1979 Lewis and Jones in 1992 demonstrated that the supergene consists of three linked diallelic loci 11 12 13 The G locus is responsible for determining the characteristic of the gynoecium which includes the style length and incompatibility responses the P locus determines the pollen size and the pollen s incompatibility responses and finally the A locus determines the anther height These three diallelic loci compose the S allele and the s alleles segregating at the supergene S locus which is notated as GPA and gpa respectively There have been other propositions that there are possibly 9 loci responsible for the distyly supergene in Primula but there has been no convincing genetic data to support this Additionally supergene control is implied for tristyly but there is no genetic evidence available to support it A supergene model for tristyly would require the occurrence of two supergenes at the S and M loci 9 References edit a b c Charles Darwin 1862 On the two forms or dimorphic condition in the species of Primula and on their remarkable sexual relations Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnaean Society Botany 6 22 77 96 doi 10 1111 j 1095 8312 1862 tb01218 x a b c Charles Darwin 1877 The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species London Murray a b P H Barrett ed 1977 The collected papers of Charles Darwin Chicago University Press Arthur Cronquist Arthur H Holmgren Noel H Holmgren James L Reveal Patricia K Holmgren 1984 Subclass Asteridae except Asteraceae Intermountain Flora Vascular Plants of the Intermountain West U S A Vol 4 The New York Botanical Garden p 224 ISBN 0 89327 248 5 Franklin Tong Vernonica E 2008 Self Incompatibility in Flowering Plants Evolution Diversity and Mechanisms doi 10 1007 978 3 540 68486 2 hdl 1893 1157 ISBN 978 3 540 68485 5 a b Lloyd D G Webb C J 1992 The Evolution of Heterostyly Evolution and Function of Heterostyly Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics Springer Berlin Heidelberg vol 15 pp 151 178 doi 10 1007 978 3 642 86656 2 6 ISBN 978 3 642 86658 6 Vuilleumier Beryl S 1967 The Origin and Evolutionary Development of Heterostyly in the Angiosperms Evolution 21 2 210 226 doi 10 1111 j 1558 5646 1967 tb00150 x PMID 28556125 Mulcahy David L 1975 The Reproductive Biology of Eichhornia crassipes Pontederiaceae Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 102 1 18 21 doi 10 2307 2484592 JSTOR 2484592 a b c Barrett S C H Shore J S 2008 New Insights on Heterostyly Comparative Biology Ecology and Genetics Self Incompatibility in Flowering Plants Springer Berlin Heidelberg pp 3 32 doi 10 1007 978 3 540 68486 2 1 ISBN 978 3 540 68485 5 Darwin Charles 2010 The Different Forms of Flowers on Plants of the Same Species doi 10 1017 cbo9780511731419 hdl 2027 coo 31924000539431 ISBN 9780511731419 Retrieved 2020 05 26 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a website ignored help a b Charlesworth D Charlesworth B 1979 A Model for the Evolution of Distyly The American Naturalist 114 4 467 498 doi 10 1086 283496 ISSN 0003 0147 S2CID 85285185 Ernst Alfred 1955 Self fertility in monomorphic Primulas Genetica 27 1 391 448 doi 10 1007 bf01664170 ISSN 0016 6707 S2CID 40422115 Lewis D Jones D A 1992 The Genetics of Heterostyly Evolution and Function of Heterostyly Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics Springer Berlin Heidelberg vol 15 pp 129 150 doi 10 1007 978 3 642 86656 2 5 ISBN 978 3 642 86658 6External links editLloyd D Webb C Dulberger R 1990 Heterostyly in species of Narcissus Amaryllidaceae and Hugonia Linaceae and other disputed cases Plant Systematics and Evolution 172 1 4 215 227 doi 10 1007 BF00937808 JSTOR 23674709 S2CID 44876403 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Heterostyly amp oldid 1173446800, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.