fbpx
Wikipedia

HEXACO model of personality structure

The HEXACO model of personality structure is a six-dimensional model of human personality that was created by Ashton and Lee and explained in their book, The H Factor of Personality,[1] based on findings from a series of lexical studies involving several European and Asian languages. The six factors, or dimensions, include Honesty-Humility (H), Emotionality (E), Extraversion (X), Agreeableness (A), Conscientiousness (C), and Openness to Experience (O). Each factor is composed of traits with characteristics indicating high and low levels of the factor. The HEXACO model was developed through similar methods as other trait taxonomies and builds on the work of Costa and McCrae[2] and Goldberg.[3] The model, therefore, shares several common elements with other trait models. However, the HEXACO model is unique mainly due to the addition of the Honesty-Humility dimension.[4]

The six HEXACO personality traits

Concept edit

 
A visualization of a young woman's HEXACO scores

The HEXACO model of personality conceptualizes human personality in terms of six dimensions.

The HEXACO model was developed from several previous independent lexical studies. Language-based taxonomies for personality traits have been widely used as a method for developing personality models. This method, based on the logic of the lexical hypothesis, uses adjectives found in language that describe behaviours and tendencies among individuals. Factor analysis is used on the adjectives to identify a minimal set of independent groups of personality traits.[5]

Research studies based on the lexical hypothesis described above were first undertaken in the English language. Subsequent lexical studies were conducted in other languages and, by comparing the results, six emergent factors were revealed in similar form across all languages tested, including English.[6][7]

Personality is often assessed using a self-report inventory or observer report inventory. The six factors are measured through a series of questions designed to rate an individual on levels of each factor.[8] Ashton and Lee have developed self- and observer report forms of the HEXACO Personality Inventory-Revised (HEXACO-PI-R).[9] The HEXACO-PI-R assesses the six broad HEXACO personality factors, each of which contains four "facets", or narrower personality characteristics. (An additional 25th narrow facet, called Altruism, is also included and represents a blend of the Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, and Agreeableness factors.)

The six factors, their facets, and the personality-descriptive adjectives that typically belong to these six groups are as follows:[10]

  • Honesty-Humility (H):
    • Facets: Sincerity, Fairness, Greed Avoidance, Modesty
    • Adjectives: {sincere, honest, faithful, loyal, modest/unassuming} versus {sly, deceitful, greedy, pretentious, hypocritical, boastful, pompous}
  • Emotionality (E):
    • Facets: Fearfulness, Anxiety, Dependence, Sentimentality
    • Adjectives: {emotional, oversensitive, sentimental, fearful, anxious, vulnerable} versus {brave, tough, independent, self-assured, stable}
  • Extraversion (X):
    • Facets: Social Self-Esteem, Social Boldness, Sociability, Liveliness
    • Adjectives: {outgoing, lively, extraverted, sociable, talkative, cheerful, active} versus {shy, passive, withdrawn, introverted, quiet, reserved}
  • Agreeableness (A):
    • Facets: Forgivingness, Gentleness, Flexibility, Patience
    • Adjectives: {patient, tolerant, peaceful, mild, agreeable, lenient, gentle} versus {ill-tempered, quarrelsome, stubborn, choleric}
  • Conscientiousness (C):
    • Facets: Organization, Diligence, Perfectionism, Prudence
    • Adjectives: {organized, disciplined, diligent, careful, thorough, precise} versus {sloppy, negligent, reckless, lazy, irresponsible, absent-minded}
  • Openness to Experience (O):
    • Facets: Aesthetic Appreciation, Inquisitiveness, Creativity, Unconventionality
    • Adjectives: {intellectual, creative, unconventional, innovative, ironic} versus {shallow, unimaginative, conventional}

History edit

The HEXACO Model of Personality started initial development in 2000.[11] It was derived from earlier used models of personality such as the Big Five factors covered in the NEO-PI. These Big Five personality traits (Conscientiousness, Agreeableness, Openness to Experience, Neuroticism, and Extraversion) were the result of earlier lexical studies of personality and were popularized in the 1980s. However, when similar lexical studies were conducted in multiple other languages instead of just English, a sixth factor emerged, which was called the Honesty-Humility factor.[12] The other languages the new lexical studies were conducted in included: Dutch, French, Korean, Polish, Croatian, Filipino, Greek, German, Italian, Hungarian, and Turkish.[13] Additionally, the lexical studies in other languages revealed different sub-facets of the Emotionality and Agreeableness factors than the original Five Factor model suggested.[12] Today, the HEXACO model has become a widely used model of personality.[14]

Relations with Big Five model edit

Currently, the most widely used model of personality structure is also based on analyses of personality-descriptive adjectives. This model consists of the five personality factors collectively known as the "Big Five".[3] Three of the Big Five factors are similar to the Extraversion, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience factors of the HEXACO model. The two remaining Big Five factors, called Agreeableness and Neuroticism (with the opposite pole of the latter factor being Emotional Stability), are similar to the Agreeableness and Emotionality factors of the HEXACO model – but with some differences in the content of the factors. Agreeableness and Emotionality from the HEXACO model represent rotated variants of their Big Five counterparts, for example, characteristics related to a quick temper are associated with Neuroticism or low Emotional Stability in the Big Five framework, but with low Agreeableness in the HEXACO framework. Therefore, the Big Five's Agreeableness and HEXACO's Agreeableness are not identical. The Big Five factors do not include an Honesty-Humility factor, but some of the characteristics belonging to Honesty-Humility are incorporated into the Big Five's Agreeableness factor. Although earlier investigations found only the Big Five factors, more recent studies conducted in various languages (including English) with larger sets of adjectives recovered six factors, as summarized above.[6][15] The names of four of the HEXACO factors (all except Honesty-Humility and Emotionality) were adopted from existing labels for the Big Five factors. Factor names were selected on the basis of the common meaning of the characteristics within each factor. Still, other studies that compare the two show that some traits can be analyzed using the HEXACO model instead of the Big Five. For the sake of example, traits like narcissism or manipulativeness can be evaluated with the honesty-humility trait included in the model.[16]

Research topics edit

Theoretical basis of Agreeableness, Honesty-Humility and Emotionality edit

The HEXACO model is often used in research studies when behaviors or traits found on the Agreeableness, Honesty-Humility and Emotionality dimensions are of specific interest. The factors of Agreeableness, Honesty-Humility and Emotionality are distinctly different from their counterparts on the Five Factor Model (FFM). Honesty-Humility, Emotionality and Agreeableness are proposed to be measures of Altruistic versus Antagonistic behavior. Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness both measure two different aspects of Reciprocal altruism, high levels of which indicate a propensity for helping behavior and cooperation as opposed to the exploitation of others. The Honesty-Humility factor represents a person's tendency for pro-social altruistic behaviors,[17] while Agreeableness indicates an individual's tendency to forgive and to show tolerance. Emotionality is a measure of kin altruism, that is, the tendency to show empathy and attachment to one's kin.

Honesty-Humility and the Dark Triad edit

The Honesty-Humility factor has been used in a variety of studies as a measure of ethical or pro-social behavior (See Ashton and Lee (2008)[18] for further details). Low levels of the Honesty-Humility factor are associated with greater levels of materialism, unethical business practices and deviant sexual behavior. The Honesty-Humility factor has been found to predict endorsement of unethical business practices [19] and even the degree to which a person will take health and safety risks (even towards fellow employees).[20] An individual who scores low on the Honesty-Humility factor may have a proclivity for anti-social acts. Which anti-social acts an individual is likely to commit may be related to their personality profile along the other factors of the HEXACO model. For example, someone who scores low on Honesty-Humility and low on Conscientiousness and Agreeableness are more likely to engage in delinquency in the workplace.[18]

The dark triad of personality consists of psychopathy, Machiavellianism and narcissism. Psychopathy is identified by characteristics such as remorselessness, antisociality and selfishness. Machiavellianism consists of selfishness, in that one will focus on their own needs, primarily by manipulating others. Narcissism can also be defined as selfishness, but is different as this person would consider themselves of a higher importance than those around them.[21] However, these constructs are said to be not fully represented in common five-factor models of personality. The Dark Triad can be conceptualized as being on the opposite pole of Honesty-Humility (Sincere, Faithful, Loyal etc.), which would mean that low levels of Honesty-Humility corresponds to higher levels of psychopathy, Machiavellianism and/or narcissism.[8][22] The Dark Triad personality constructs tend to only correlate with disagreeableness on the Big Five Inventory, otherwise they are represented inconsistently on measures of the Big Five traits.[23] For that reason, several researchers have used the HEXACO model to gain a more detailed understanding of the personality characteristics of individuals who exhibit traits/behaviors that would be considered along the Dark Triad dimension.[24]

ACT Behavioral Skills Framework edit

The Behavioral Skills Framework (BSF) was developed by the ACT board to focus on building knowledge and skills to be successful in education and work environments. It was structured around, but did not directly replicate, the six HEXACO facets and emphasizes the hierarchical structure of personality.[25]

 
The HEXACO dimensions visualized in two-dimensions according to the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behavior

Visualization in two dimensions edit

The dimensions of the HEXACO model of personality has been visualized in two dimensions using the Atlas of Personality, Emotion and Behavior.[26] The adjectives used to describe each HEXACO dimension are scored using the atlas' two orthogonal dimensions of affiliation and dominance. The scored points are then visualized using kernel density plots in two dimensions. The vectors drawn on each of the six plots is a representation of the HEXACO dimension expressed in the two dimensions of the atlas.

Psychological effects edit

Social behavior edit

The addition of the sixth factor, as well as the rotation of Agreeableness and Emotionality, allows for examination and prediction of behavior based on less prosocial behavior. Studies using the HEXACO model have found support for the relationship between Agreeableness and Honesty-Humility on pro-social and ethical behavior. One study showed a significant relationship between levels of Honesty-Humility and the endorsement of revenge,[27] while another found that levels of Agreeableness were related to the tendency to forgive.[28]

Creativity edit

Levels of Honesty-Humility have also been found to be related to levels of creativity. Specifically, low levels of Honesty-Humility were found to be related to higher levels of self-reported creativity; though, no relationship between creativity and Agreeableness was found.[29]

Risk taking edit

Further research using the HEXACO model has examined the relationship between its various domains and scores on risk taking behavior. In one study: levels of emotionality were related to perceptions of risk; levels of conscientiousness were related to perceived benefits; while openness and honesty-humility predicted social risk taking and health/safety risk taking respectively.[30]

Sexuality edit

The HEXACO model has also been used in studies of sexuality, including the association of seductive behavior and endorsement of sexual activity without emotional attachment to Emotionality and Honesty-Humility.[31] As well, levels of Honesty-Humility were associated with being faithful to one's partner in a relationship.[32] Other topics of study that utilized the HEXACO model include: religiosity,[33] prejudice,[34] ethical decision making,[19] academic performance,[35][36] and political attitudes/behaviors.[37][38][39]

Education edit

Research shows the H-H and conscientious factors of HEXACO model are useful for predicting counterproductive student behaviors in college students. Conscientiousness may be the most consistent facet of the six in its association to student GPA.[25]

Cognitive Ability edit

Meta-analytic research shows that openness has a small positive correlation with intelligence and emotionality has a small negative correlation with intelligence. Facets of openness related to inquisitiveness and unconventionality show the strongest correlation with intelligence, in contrast to creativity and aesthetic appreciation. Of the emotionality facets, fearfulness showed the strongest negative correlation with intelligence. Other domains of HEXACO including honesty-humility appear to be uncorrelated with intelligence, although there are several differential correlations at the facet-level. Notably, across conscientiousness facets, a preference for structure and order ("organization") has a small negative correlation with intelligence, whereas prudence had a small positive correlation with intelligence.[40]

Employment edit

Strong meaningful associations are shown between the HEXACO model and job satisfaction, most notably the Extraversion trait. Research also suggested relationships between the HEXACO, mostly Honesty-Humility trait, and negative work behaviors like sexual harassment, unethical decision making and counterproductive work behavior.[25][41]

With the exception of the Emotionality factor, strong correlations between the other 5 HEXACO factors and Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) have been found. Overall, the HEXACO sub-facets have been shown to be better predictors of OCB than the broader 6 traits, with sub-facets like diligence (conscientiousness), liveliness and sociability (extraversion), and fairness (honesty-humility) being the best predictors.[41]

Pro-environment attitudes & behavior edit

Studies show that individual personality differences have a role in shaping environmentalism and HEXACO traits have been shown to predict who is more likely to adopt pro-environment attitudes and behaviors, which are attitudes and actions that are shown to positively affect the environment. The traits of Honesty-Humility and Openness to Experience are the strongest predictors of pro-environmental attitudes/behaviors.[42]

Subjective well-being edit

HEXACO traits and sub-facets have been shown to predict self-reported psychological and subjective well-being. Extraversion is the largest predictor of well-being closely followed by Conscientiousness. The Extraversion sub-facets of liveliness and self-esteem have the highest positive correlations with well-being and the Emotionality facet of anxiety has the highest negative correlation with wellbeing. Neuroticism is the best predictor of well-being in the Big Five model, and even though it's closely related to HEXACO Emotionality, slight differences between the two traits mean that Emotionality is not as good of a predictor of well-being as Big Five Neuroticism is.[43]

Criticisms edit

The HEXACO model of personality is a trait-based taxonomy of personality. As such, the criticism and limitations of the model are similar to that of other trait-based measures (see Big Five personality traits § Critique). Trait-based measures, including the HEXACO model, typically rely on factor analysis. Unfortunately, factor analysis does not always ensure replicable results. Models created through factor analysis can vary between samples, depending on: (i) how the researcher organizes the measures (e.g., using unipolar versus bipolar ratings), and (ii) the amount of ratings/variables that are included in the analysis.[44]

De Raad et al. have argued that only three personality traits have fully replicated (i.e., appeared in all analyses) across cultures (extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness). These authors argue that beyond three traits, the factor markers become unreliable. They further argue that claims of universality for the HEXACO model should be cautiously considered, since many languages and cultures have yet to be assessed with appropriate personality trait studies.[45] Furthermore, the Honesty-Humility dimension is not always consistently replicated. Several past studies have identified inconsistent sixth-factor dimensions (e.g. hedonism–spontaneity)[46] while other research has identified potentially more than six factors.[17] The above criticism is not unique to the HEXACO model, given that there has been considerable debate regarding the identity of the fifth factor of personality in the Five-Factor Model, especially across cultures.[47]

Many studies using the HEXACO model support the usefulness of the dimensions of Agreeableness, Emotionality and Honesty–Humility. However, the HEXACO model may not necessarily be a better personality tool in every situation. When the HEXACO model was compared to a modified five-factor model that included a dimension of honesty–humility, the predictive ability of the HEXACO model was similar in several instances to that of the modified FFM (Five Factor Model).[31] The authors further acknowledge that the HEXACO model may have an advantage when the predictor variables are conceptually related to the Honesty–Humility factor, and that in many cases the modified FFM-plus-Honesty–Humility model produced similar results.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Ashton, Michael C.; Lee, Kibeom; Perugini, Marco; Szarota, Piotr; de Vries, Reinout E.; Di Blas, Lisa; Boies, Kathleen; De Raad, Boele (2004). "A Six-Factor Structure of Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: Solutions From Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86 (2): 356–366. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356. ISSN 0022-3514. PMID 14769090.
  2. ^ Costa, P.T.,Jr. & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) manual.Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  3. ^ a b Goldberg LR (January 1993). "The structure of phenotypic personality traits". Am Psychol. 48 (1): 26–34. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26. PMID 8427480. S2CID 20595956.
  4. ^ Ashton MC, Lee K (2007). "Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure". Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 11 (2): 150–66. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907. PMID 18453460. S2CID 13183244.
  5. ^ Thurstone, L. L. (1934). "The vectors of mind". Psychological Review. 41 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1037/h0075959. ISSN 0033-295X.
  6. ^ a b Lee K, Ashton MC (2008). "The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages". J Pers. 76 (5): 1001–54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x. PMID 18665898.
  7. ^ C., Ashton, Michael (2018). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press. pp. 59–83. ISBN 9780128098455. OCLC 987583452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. ^ a b Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K. (2009). "The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality". Journal of Personality Assessment. 91 (4): 340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878. PMID 20017063. S2CID 17179958.
  9. ^ Lee, K.; Ashton, M.C. (2004). "The HEXACO Personality Inventory: A New Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality". Multivariate Behavioral Research. 39 (2): 329–358. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8. PMID 26804579. S2CID 27763606.
  10. ^ Ashton MC; Lee K (2007). "Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure". Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 11 (2): 150–66. doi:10.1177/1088868306294907. PMID 18453460. S2CID 13183244.
  11. ^ "The HEXACO Personality Inventory - Revised". www.hexaco.org. Retrieved 2022-04-25.
  12. ^ a b Ashton, Michael Craig (2017). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). ISBN 978-0-12-809845-5. OCLC 987583452.
  13. ^ Lee, Kibeom; Ashton, Michael C. (October 2008). "The HEXACO Personality Factors in the Indigenous Personality Lexicons of English and 11 Other Languages". Journal of Personality. 76 (5): 1001–1054. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x. ISSN 0022-3506. PMID 18665898.
  14. ^ Moshagen, Morten; Thielmann, Isabel; Hilbig, Benjamin E.; Zettler, Ingo (July 2019). "Meta-Analytic Investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(-Revised)". Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 227 (3): 186–194. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000377. ISSN 2190-8370. S2CID 201398756.
  15. ^ Saucier G (October 2009). "Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: indications for a big six structure". J Pers. 77 (5): 1577–614. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00593.x. PMID 19678873. S2CID 7106403.
  16. ^ C., Ashton, Michael (2013). Individual differences and personality (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. ISBN 9780123741295. OCLC 835227535.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b Thalmayer, A. G.; Saucier, G.; Eigenhuis, A. (2011). "Comparative Validity of Brief to Medium-Length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires". Psychological Assessment. 23 (4): 995–1009. doi:10.1037/a0024165. PMID 21859221.
  18. ^ a b Ashton, M. C.; Lee, K. (2008). "The HEXACO Model of Personality Structure and the Importance of the H Factor". Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 2 (5): 1952. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00134.x.
  19. ^ a b Lee, K.; Ashton, M. C.; Morrison, D. L.; Cordery, D.; Dunlop, P. D. (2008). "Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model: Use of self- and observer reports". Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 81: 147–167. doi:10.1348/096317907x195175.
  20. ^ Weller, J. A.; Tikir, A. (2011). "Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure". Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 24 (2): 180. doi:10.1002/bdm.677.
  21. ^ C., Ashton, Michael (2017-06-13). Individual Differences and Personality (3rd ed.). ISBN 9780128098455. OCLC 987583452.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ Ashton, M.C.; Lee, K. (2005). "Honesty-Humility, the Big Five and the Five-Factor Model". Journal of Personality. 73 (5): 1321–1353. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00351.x. PMID 16138875.
  23. ^ Paulhus, D.L.; Williams, K.M. (2002). "The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy". Journal of Research in Personality. 36 (6): 556–563. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6. S2CID 6535576.
  24. ^ de Vries, R.E.; van Kampen, D. (2010). "The HEXACO and 5DPT Models of Personality: A Comparison and Their Relationships with Psychopathy, Egoism, Pretentiousness, Immorality and Machiavelliansim" (PDF). Journal of Personality Disorders. 24 (2): 244–257. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.2.244. PMID 20420478.
  25. ^ a b c McAbee, Samuel T.; Casillas, Alex; Way, Jason D.; Guo, Feng (July 2019). "The HEXACO Model in Education and Work". Zeitschrift für Psychologie. 227 (3): 174–185. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000376. ISSN 2190-8370. S2CID 201478382.
  26. ^ Mobbs, Anthony E. D. (2020). "An atlas of personality, emotion and behaviour". PLOS ONE. 15 (1): e0227877. Bibcode:2020PLoSO..1527877M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0227877. PMC 6974095. PMID 31961895.
  27. ^ Edwin SK, Boon SD (January 2012). "Predicting appraisals of romantic revenge: The roles of Honesty–Humility, Agreeableness, and vengefulness". Personality and Individual Differences. 52 (2): 128–132. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.014.
  28. ^ Shepherd & Belicki, 2008
  29. ^ Silva, P.J.; Kaufman, J.C.; Reiter-Palmon, R.; Wigert, B. (2011). "Cantankerous Creativity: Honesty-Humility, Agreeablesness and the HEXACO structure of Creative Achievement". Personality and Individual Differences. 51 (5): 687–689. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.011.
  30. ^ Weller JA, Tikir A (April 2011). "Predicting domain-specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure". Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 24 (2): 180–201. doi:10.1002/bdm.677.
  31. ^ a b Ashton, M. C.; Lee, K. (2008). "The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality". Journal of Research in Personality. 42 (5): 1216. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.006.
  32. ^ Bourdage, J. S.; Lee, K.; Ashton, M. C.; Perry, A. (2007). "Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality". Personality and Individual Differences. 43 (6): 1506–1516. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.008.
  33. ^ Saroglou, V.; Pichon, I.; Trompette, L.; Verschueren, M.; Dernelle, R. (2005). "Prosocial behavior and religion: New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings". Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 44 (3): 323–348. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.503.7559. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2005.00289.x.
  34. ^ Sibley, C. G.; Harding, J. F.; Perry, R.; Asbrock, F.; Duckitt, J. (2010). "Personality and prejudice: Extension of the HEXACO personality model". European Journal of Personality. 24 (6): 515–534. doi:10.1002/per.750. S2CID 144042194.
  35. ^ Noftle EE, Robins RW (July 2007). "Personality predictors of academic outcomes: big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores". J Pers Soc Psychol. 93 (1): 116–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116. PMID 17605593.
  36. ^ de Vries A, de Vries RE, Born MPh (October 2010). "Broad versus narrow traits: Conscientiousness and honesty-humility as predictors of academic criteria". European Journal of Personality. 25 (5): 336–348. doi:10.1002/per.795. S2CID 18908590.
  37. ^ Zettler, I.; Hilbig, B. E.; Haubrich, J. (2011). "Altruism at the ballots: Predicting political attitudes and behavior". Journal of Research in Personality. 45: 130–133. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.010.
  38. ^ Chirumbolo, A.; Leone, L. (2010). "Personality and politics: The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting". Personality and Individual Differences. 49: 43–48. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.004.
  39. ^ Zettler, I.; Hilbig, B. E. (2010). "Attitudes of the selfless: Explaining political orientation with altruism". Personality and Individual Differences. 48 (3): 338–342. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.002.
  40. ^ Anglim, Jeromy; Dunlop, Patrick D.; Wee, Serena; Horwood, Sharon; Wood, Joshua K.; Marty, Andrew (May 2022). "Personality and intelligence: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 148 (5–6): 301–336. doi:10.1037/bul0000373. ISSN 1939-1455. S2CID 253344751.
  41. ^ a b Pletzer, Jan Luca; Oostrom, Janneke; De Vries, Reinout (August 2020). "HEXACO Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Domain- and Facet-Level Meta-Analysis". Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020 (1): 10335. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2020.10335abstract. ISSN 0065-0668.
  42. ^ Soutter, Alistair Raymond Bryce; Bates, Timothy C.; Mõttus, René (2020-05-08). "Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits, Proenvironmental Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 15 (4): 913–941. doi:10.1177/1745691620903019. ISSN 1745-6916. PMC 7333518. PMID 32384257. S2CID 218563688.
  43. ^ Anglim, Jeromy; Horwood, Sharon; Smillie, Luke D.; Marrero, Rosario J.; Wood, Joshua K. (April 2020). "Predicting psychological and subjective well-being from personality: A meta-analysis". Psychological Bulletin. 146 (4): 279–323. doi:10.1037/bul0000226. ISSN 1939-1455. PMID 31944795. S2CID 210698453.
  44. ^ Goldberg, L. R. (1992). "The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure". Psychological Assessment. 4: 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26. S2CID 144709415.
  45. ^ De Raad, B.; Al, Et; Mlačić, Boris; Church, A. Timothy; Katigbak, Marcia S.; Ostendorf, Fritz; Hřebíčková, Martina; Di Blas, Lisa; Szirmák, Zsófia (2010). "Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages: Reply to Ashton and Lee". Journal of Research in Personality. 44 (4): 442–445. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.005.
  46. ^ Becker, P. (1999). "Beyond the Big Five". Personality and Individual Differences. 26 (3): 511–530. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(98)00168-8.
  47. ^ Larsen, R.J., & Buss, D.M. (2008). Personality Psychology: Domains of knowledge about human behaviour, third edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

External links edit

  • Website for HEXACO-PI-R, including interactive online administration as well as free downloading for academic research and teaching purposes.
  • The H Factor of Personality: Why Some People are Manipulative, Self-Entitled, Materialistic, and Exploitive—And Why It Matters for Everyone (This book is written for the general audience and explores the importance of the Honesty-Humility factor in various aspects of people's lives.)
  • The International Personality Item Pool has a public domain collection of scales that measure the HEXACO traits.

hexaco, model, personality, structure, dimensional, model, human, personality, that, created, ashton, explained, their, book, factor, personality, based, findings, from, series, lexical, studies, involving, several, european, asian, languages, factors, dimensi. The HEXACO model of personality structure is a six dimensional model of human personality that was created by Ashton and Lee and explained in their book The H Factor of Personality 1 based on findings from a series of lexical studies involving several European and Asian languages The six factors or dimensions include Honesty Humility H Emotionality E Extraversion X Agreeableness A Conscientiousness C and Openness to Experience O Each factor is composed of traits with characteristics indicating high and low levels of the factor The HEXACO model was developed through similar methods as other trait taxonomies and builds on the work of Costa and McCrae 2 and Goldberg 3 The model therefore shares several common elements with other trait models However the HEXACO model is unique mainly due to the addition of the Honesty Humility dimension 4 The six HEXACO personality traits Contents 1 Concept 2 History 3 Relations with Big Five model 4 Research topics 4 1 Theoretical basis of Agreeableness Honesty Humility and Emotionality 4 2 Honesty Humility and the Dark Triad 4 3 ACT Behavioral Skills Framework 4 4 Visualization in two dimensions 5 Psychological effects 5 1 Social behavior 5 2 Creativity 5 3 Risk taking 5 4 Sexuality 5 5 Education 5 6 Cognitive Ability 5 7 Employment 5 8 Pro environment attitudes amp behavior 5 9 Subjective well being 6 Criticisms 7 See also 8 References 9 External linksConcept edit nbsp A visualization of a young woman s HEXACO scoresThe HEXACO model of personality conceptualizes human personality in terms of six dimensions The HEXACO model was developed from several previous independent lexical studies Language based taxonomies for personality traits have been widely used as a method for developing personality models This method based on the logic of the lexical hypothesis uses adjectives found in language that describe behaviours and tendencies among individuals Factor analysis is used on the adjectives to identify a minimal set of independent groups of personality traits 5 Research studies based on the lexical hypothesis described above were first undertaken in the English language Subsequent lexical studies were conducted in other languages and by comparing the results six emergent factors were revealed in similar form across all languages tested including English 6 7 Personality is often assessed using a self report inventory or observer report inventory The six factors are measured through a series of questions designed to rate an individual on levels of each factor 8 Ashton and Lee have developed self and observer report forms of the HEXACO Personality Inventory Revised HEXACO PI R 9 The HEXACO PI R assesses the six broad HEXACO personality factors each of which contains four facets or narrower personality characteristics An additional 25th narrow facet called Altruism is also included and represents a blend of the Honesty Humility Emotionality and Agreeableness factors The six factors their facets and the personality descriptive adjectives that typically belong to these six groups are as follows 10 Honesty Humility H Facets Sincerity Fairness Greed Avoidance Modesty Adjectives sincere honest faithful loyal modest unassuming versus sly deceitful greedy pretentious hypocritical boastful pompous Emotionality E Facets Fearfulness Anxiety Dependence Sentimentality Adjectives emotional oversensitive sentimental fearful anxious vulnerable versus brave tough independent self assured stable Extraversion X Facets Social Self Esteem Social Boldness Sociability Liveliness Adjectives outgoing lively extraverted sociable talkative cheerful active versus shy passive withdrawn introverted quiet reserved Agreeableness A Facets Forgivingness Gentleness Flexibility Patience Adjectives patient tolerant peaceful mild agreeable lenient gentle versus ill tempered quarrelsome stubborn choleric Conscientiousness C Facets Organization Diligence Perfectionism Prudence Adjectives organized disciplined diligent careful thorough precise versus sloppy negligent reckless lazy irresponsible absent minded Openness to Experience O Facets Aesthetic Appreciation Inquisitiveness Creativity Unconventionality Adjectives intellectual creative unconventional innovative ironic versus shallow unimaginative conventional History editThe HEXACO Model of Personality started initial development in 2000 11 It was derived from earlier used models of personality such as the Big Five factors covered in the NEO PI These Big Five personality traits Conscientiousness Agreeableness Openness to Experience Neuroticism and Extraversion were the result of earlier lexical studies of personality and were popularized in the 1980s However when similar lexical studies were conducted in multiple other languages instead of just English a sixth factor emerged which was called the Honesty Humility factor 12 The other languages the new lexical studies were conducted in included Dutch French Korean Polish Croatian Filipino Greek German Italian Hungarian and Turkish 13 Additionally the lexical studies in other languages revealed different sub facets of the Emotionality and Agreeableness factors than the original Five Factor model suggested 12 Today the HEXACO model has become a widely used model of personality 14 Relations with Big Five model editCurrently the most widely used model of personality structure is also based on analyses of personality descriptive adjectives This model consists of the five personality factors collectively known as the Big Five 3 Three of the Big Five factors are similar to the Extraversion Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience factors of the HEXACO model The two remaining Big Five factors called Agreeableness and Neuroticism with the opposite pole of the latter factor being Emotional Stability are similar to the Agreeableness and Emotionality factors of the HEXACO model but with some differences in the content of the factors Agreeableness and Emotionality from the HEXACO model represent rotated variants of their Big Five counterparts for example characteristics related to a quick temper are associated with Neuroticism or low Emotional Stability in the Big Five framework but with low Agreeableness in the HEXACO framework Therefore the Big Five s Agreeableness and HEXACO s Agreeableness are not identical The Big Five factors do not include an Honesty Humility factor but some of the characteristics belonging to Honesty Humility are incorporated into the Big Five s Agreeableness factor Although earlier investigations found only the Big Five factors more recent studies conducted in various languages including English with larger sets of adjectives recovered six factors as summarized above 6 15 The names of four of the HEXACO factors all except Honesty Humility and Emotionality were adopted from existing labels for the Big Five factors Factor names were selected on the basis of the common meaning of the characteristics within each factor Still other studies that compare the two show that some traits can be analyzed using the HEXACO model instead of the Big Five For the sake of example traits like narcissism or manipulativeness can be evaluated with the honesty humility trait included in the model 16 Research topics editTheoretical basis of Agreeableness Honesty Humility and Emotionality edit The HEXACO model is often used in research studies when behaviors or traits found on the Agreeableness Honesty Humility and Emotionality dimensions are of specific interest The factors of Agreeableness Honesty Humility and Emotionality are distinctly different from their counterparts on the Five Factor Model FFM Honesty Humility Emotionality and Agreeableness are proposed to be measures of Altruistic versus Antagonistic behavior Honesty Humility and Agreeableness both measure two different aspects of Reciprocal altruism high levels of which indicate a propensity for helping behavior and cooperation as opposed to the exploitation of others The Honesty Humility factor represents a person s tendency for pro social altruistic behaviors 17 while Agreeableness indicates an individual s tendency to forgive and to show tolerance Emotionality is a measure of kin altruism that is the tendency to show empathy and attachment to one s kin Honesty Humility and the Dark Triad edit The Honesty Humility factor has been used in a variety of studies as a measure of ethical or pro social behavior See Ashton and Lee 2008 18 for further details Low levels of the Honesty Humility factor are associated with greater levels of materialism unethical business practices and deviant sexual behavior The Honesty Humility factor has been found to predict endorsement of unethical business practices 19 and even the degree to which a person will take health and safety risks even towards fellow employees 20 An individual who scores low on the Honesty Humility factor may have a proclivity for anti social acts Which anti social acts an individual is likely to commit may be related to their personality profile along the other factors of the HEXACO model For example someone who scores low on Honesty Humility and low on Conscientiousness and Agreeableness are more likely to engage in delinquency in the workplace 18 The dark triad of personality consists of psychopathy Machiavellianism and narcissism Psychopathy is identified by characteristics such as remorselessness antisociality and selfishness Machiavellianism consists of selfishness in that one will focus on their own needs primarily by manipulating others Narcissism can also be defined as selfishness but is different as this person would consider themselves of a higher importance than those around them 21 However these constructs are said to be not fully represented in common five factor models of personality The Dark Triad can be conceptualized as being on the opposite pole of Honesty Humility Sincere Faithful Loyal etc which would mean that low levels of Honesty Humility corresponds to higher levels of psychopathy Machiavellianism and or narcissism 8 22 The Dark Triad personality constructs tend to only correlate with disagreeableness on the Big Five Inventory otherwise they are represented inconsistently on measures of the Big Five traits 23 For that reason several researchers have used the HEXACO model to gain a more detailed understanding of the personality characteristics of individuals who exhibit traits behaviors that would be considered along the Dark Triad dimension 24 ACT Behavioral Skills Framework editThe Behavioral Skills Framework BSF was developed by the ACT board to focus on building knowledge and skills to be successful in education and work environments It was structured around but did not directly replicate the six HEXACO facets and emphasizes the hierarchical structure of personality 25 nbsp The HEXACO dimensions visualized in two dimensions according to the Atlas of Personality Emotion and BehaviorVisualization in two dimensions edit The dimensions of the HEXACO model of personality has been visualized in two dimensions using the Atlas of Personality Emotion and Behavior 26 The adjectives used to describe each HEXACO dimension are scored using the atlas two orthogonal dimensions of affiliation and dominance The scored points are then visualized using kernel density plots in two dimensions The vectors drawn on each of the six plots is a representation of the HEXACO dimension expressed in the two dimensions of the atlas Psychological effects editSocial behavior edit The addition of the sixth factor as well as the rotation of Agreeableness and Emotionality allows for examination and prediction of behavior based on less prosocial behavior Studies using the HEXACO model have found support for the relationship between Agreeableness and Honesty Humility on pro social and ethical behavior One study showed a significant relationship between levels of Honesty Humility and the endorsement of revenge 27 while another found that levels of Agreeableness were related to the tendency to forgive 28 Creativity edit Levels of Honesty Humility have also been found to be related to levels of creativity Specifically low levels of Honesty Humility were found to be related to higher levels of self reported creativity though no relationship between creativity and Agreeableness was found 29 Risk taking edit Further research using the HEXACO model has examined the relationship between its various domains and scores on risk taking behavior In one study levels of emotionality were related to perceptions of risk levels of conscientiousness were related to perceived benefits while openness and honesty humility predicted social risk taking and health safety risk taking respectively 30 Sexuality edit The HEXACO model has also been used in studies of sexuality including the association of seductive behavior and endorsement of sexual activity without emotional attachment to Emotionality and Honesty Humility 31 As well levels of Honesty Humility were associated with being faithful to one s partner in a relationship 32 Other topics of study that utilized the HEXACO model include religiosity 33 prejudice 34 ethical decision making 19 academic performance 35 36 and political attitudes behaviors 37 38 39 Education edit Research shows the H H and conscientious factors of HEXACO model are useful for predicting counterproductive student behaviors in college students Conscientiousness may be the most consistent facet of the six in its association to student GPA 25 Cognitive Ability edit Meta analytic research shows that openness has a small positive correlation with intelligence and emotionality has a small negative correlation with intelligence Facets of openness related to inquisitiveness and unconventionality show the strongest correlation with intelligence in contrast to creativity and aesthetic appreciation Of the emotionality facets fearfulness showed the strongest negative correlation with intelligence Other domains of HEXACO including honesty humility appear to be uncorrelated with intelligence although there are several differential correlations at the facet level Notably across conscientiousness facets a preference for structure and order organization has a small negative correlation with intelligence whereas prudence had a small positive correlation with intelligence 40 Employment edit Strong meaningful associations are shown between the HEXACO model and job satisfaction most notably the Extraversion trait Research also suggested relationships between the HEXACO mostly Honesty Humility trait and negative work behaviors like sexual harassment unethical decision making and counterproductive work behavior 25 41 With the exception of the Emotionality factor strong correlations between the other 5 HEXACO factors and Organizational citizenship behavior OCB have been found Overall the HEXACO sub facets have been shown to be better predictors of OCB than the broader 6 traits with sub facets like diligence conscientiousness liveliness and sociability extraversion and fairness honesty humility being the best predictors 41 Pro environment attitudes amp behavior edit Studies show that individual personality differences have a role in shaping environmentalism and HEXACO traits have been shown to predict who is more likely to adopt pro environment attitudes and behaviors which are attitudes and actions that are shown to positively affect the environment The traits of Honesty Humility and Openness to Experience are the strongest predictors of pro environmental attitudes behaviors 42 Subjective well being edit HEXACO traits and sub facets have been shown to predict self reported psychological and subjective well being Extraversion is the largest predictor of well being closely followed by Conscientiousness The Extraversion sub facets of liveliness and self esteem have the highest positive correlations with well being and the Emotionality facet of anxiety has the highest negative correlation with wellbeing Neuroticism is the best predictor of well being in the Big Five model and even though it s closely related to HEXACO Emotionality slight differences between the two traits mean that Emotionality is not as good of a predictor of well being as Big Five Neuroticism is 43 Criticisms editThe HEXACO model of personality is a trait based taxonomy of personality As such the criticism and limitations of the model are similar to that of other trait based measures see Big Five personality traits Critique Trait based measures including the HEXACO model typically rely on factor analysis Unfortunately factor analysis does not always ensure replicable results Models created through factor analysis can vary between samples depending on i how the researcher organizes the measures e g using unipolar versus bipolar ratings and ii the amount of ratings variables that are included in the analysis 44 De Raad et al have argued that only three personality traits have fully replicated i e appeared in all analyses across cultures extraversion agreeableness and conscientiousness These authors argue that beyond three traits the factor markers become unreliable They further argue that claims of universality for the HEXACO model should be cautiously considered since many languages and cultures have yet to be assessed with appropriate personality trait studies 45 Furthermore the Honesty Humility dimension is not always consistently replicated Several past studies have identified inconsistent sixth factor dimensions e g hedonism spontaneity 46 while other research has identified potentially more than six factors 17 The above criticism is not unique to the HEXACO model given that there has been considerable debate regarding the identity of the fifth factor of personality in the Five Factor Model especially across cultures 47 Many studies using the HEXACO model support the usefulness of the dimensions of Agreeableness Emotionality and Honesty Humility However the HEXACO model may not necessarily be a better personality tool in every situation When the HEXACO model was compared to a modified five factor model that included a dimension of honesty humility the predictive ability of the HEXACO model was similar in several instances to that of the modified FFM Five Factor Model 31 The authors further acknowledge that the HEXACO model may have an advantage when the predictor variables are conceptually related to the Honesty Humility factor and that in many cases the modified FFM plus Honesty Humility model produced similar results See also editPersonality psychology Revised NEO Personality Inventory Trait theory Lexical hypothesis Big five personality traits Alternative five model of personalityReferences edit Ashton Michael C Lee Kibeom Perugini Marco Szarota Piotr de Vries Reinout E Di Blas Lisa Boies Kathleen De Raad Boele 2004 A Six Factor Structure of Personality Descriptive Adjectives Solutions From Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86 2 356 366 doi 10 1037 0022 3514 86 2 356 ISSN 0022 3514 PMID 14769090 Costa P T Jr amp McCrae R R 1992 Revised NEO Personality Inventory NEO PI R and NEO Five Factor Inventory NEO FFI manual Odessa FL Psychological Assessment Resources a b Goldberg LR January 1993 The structure of phenotypic personality traits Am Psychol 48 1 26 34 doi 10 1037 0003 066X 48 1 26 PMID 8427480 S2CID 20595956 Ashton MC Lee K 2007 Empirical theoretical and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11 2 150 66 doi 10 1177 1088868306294907 PMID 18453460 S2CID 13183244 Thurstone L L 1934 The vectors of mind Psychological Review 41 1 1 32 doi 10 1037 h0075959 ISSN 0033 295X a b Lee K Ashton MC 2008 The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages J Pers 76 5 1001 54 doi 10 1111 j 1467 6494 2008 00512 x PMID 18665898 C Ashton Michael 2018 Individual Differences and Personality 3rd ed London United Kingdom Academic Press pp 59 83 ISBN 9780128098455 OCLC 987583452 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link a b Ashton M C Lee K 2009 The HEXACO 60 A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality Journal of Personality Assessment 91 4 340 345 doi 10 1080 00223890902935878 PMID 20017063 S2CID 17179958 Lee K Ashton M C 2004 The HEXACO Personality Inventory A New Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality Multivariate Behavioral Research 39 2 329 358 doi 10 1207 s15327906mbr3902 8 PMID 26804579 S2CID 27763606 Ashton MC Lee K 2007 Empirical theoretical and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure Pers Soc Psychol Rev 11 2 150 66 doi 10 1177 1088868306294907 PMID 18453460 S2CID 13183244 The HEXACO Personality Inventory Revised www hexaco org Retrieved 2022 04 25 a b Ashton Michael Craig 2017 Individual Differences and Personality 3rd ed ISBN 978 0 12 809845 5 OCLC 987583452 Lee Kibeom Ashton Michael C October 2008 The HEXACO Personality Factors in the Indigenous Personality Lexicons of English and 11 Other Languages Journal of Personality 76 5 1001 1054 doi 10 1111 j 1467 6494 2008 00512 x ISSN 0022 3506 PMID 18665898 Moshagen Morten Thielmann Isabel Hilbig Benjamin E Zettler Ingo July 2019 Meta Analytic Investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory Revised Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 227 3 186 194 doi 10 1027 2151 2604 a000377 ISSN 2190 8370 S2CID 201398756 Saucier G October 2009 Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies indications for a big six structure J Pers 77 5 1577 614 doi 10 1111 j 1467 6494 2009 00593 x PMID 19678873 S2CID 7106403 C Ashton Michael 2013 Individual differences and personality 2nd ed Amsterdam Academic Press ISBN 9780123741295 OCLC 835227535 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link a b Thalmayer A G Saucier G Eigenhuis A 2011 Comparative Validity of Brief to Medium Length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires Psychological Assessment 23 4 995 1009 doi 10 1037 a0024165 PMID 21859221 a b Ashton M C Lee K 2008 The HEXACO Model of Personality Structure and the Importance of the H Factor Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 5 1952 doi 10 1111 j 1751 9004 2008 00134 x a b Lee K Ashton M C Morrison D L Cordery D Dunlop P D 2008 Predicting integrity with the HEXACO personality model Use of self and observer reports Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 81 147 167 doi 10 1348 096317907x195175 Weller J A Tikir A 2011 Predicting domain specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 24 2 180 doi 10 1002 bdm 677 C Ashton Michael 2017 06 13 Individual Differences and Personality 3rd ed ISBN 9780128098455 OCLC 987583452 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Ashton M C Lee K 2005 Honesty Humility the Big Five and the Five Factor Model Journal of Personality 73 5 1321 1353 doi 10 1111 j 1467 6494 2005 00351 x PMID 16138875 Paulhus D L Williams K M 2002 The Dark Triad of Personality Narcissism Machiavellianism and Psychopathy Journal of Research in Personality 36 6 556 563 doi 10 1016 S0092 6566 02 00505 6 S2CID 6535576 de Vries R E van Kampen D 2010 The HEXACO and 5DPT Models of Personality A Comparison and Their Relationships with Psychopathy Egoism Pretentiousness Immorality and Machiavelliansim PDF Journal of Personality Disorders 24 2 244 257 doi 10 1521 pedi 2010 24 2 244 PMID 20420478 a b c McAbee Samuel T Casillas Alex Way Jason D Guo Feng July 2019 The HEXACO Model in Education and Work Zeitschrift fur Psychologie 227 3 174 185 doi 10 1027 2151 2604 a000376 ISSN 2190 8370 S2CID 201478382 Mobbs Anthony E D 2020 An atlas of personality emotion and behaviour PLOS ONE 15 1 e0227877 Bibcode 2020PLoSO 1527877M doi 10 1371 journal pone 0227877 PMC 6974095 PMID 31961895 Edwin SK Boon SD January 2012 Predicting appraisals of romantic revenge The roles of Honesty Humility Agreeableness and vengefulness Personality and Individual Differences 52 2 128 132 doi 10 1016 j paid 2011 09 014 Shepherd amp Belicki 2008 Silva P J Kaufman J C Reiter Palmon R Wigert B 2011 Cantankerous Creativity Honesty Humility Agreeablesness and the HEXACO structure of Creative Achievement Personality and Individual Differences 51 5 687 689 doi 10 1016 j paid 2011 06 011 Weller JA Tikir A April 2011 Predicting domain specific risk taking with the HEXACO personality structure Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 24 2 180 201 doi 10 1002 bdm 677 a b Ashton M C Lee K 2008 The prediction of Honesty Humility related criteria by the HEXACO and Five Factor Models of personality Journal of Research in Personality 42 5 1216 doi 10 1016 j jrp 2008 03 006 Bourdage J S Lee K Ashton M C Perry A 2007 Big Five and HEXACO model personality correlates of sexuality Personality and Individual Differences 43 6 1506 1516 doi 10 1016 j paid 2007 04 008 Saroglou V Pichon I Trompette L Verschueren M Dernelle R 2005 Prosocial behavior and religion New evidence based on projective measures and peer ratings Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 44 3 323 348 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 503 7559 doi 10 1111 j 1468 5906 2005 00289 x Sibley C G Harding J F Perry R Asbrock F Duckitt J 2010 Personality and prejudice Extension of the HEXACO personality model European Journal of Personality 24 6 515 534 doi 10 1002 per 750 S2CID 144042194 Noftle EE Robins RW July 2007 Personality predictors of academic outcomes big five correlates of GPA and SAT scores J Pers Soc Psychol 93 1 116 30 doi 10 1037 0022 3514 93 1 116 PMID 17605593 de Vries A de Vries RE Born MPh October 2010 Broad versus narrow traits Conscientiousness and honesty humility as predictors of academic criteria European Journal of Personality 25 5 336 348 doi 10 1002 per 795 S2CID 18908590 Zettler I Hilbig B E Haubrich J 2011 Altruism at the ballots Predicting political attitudes and behavior Journal of Research in Personality 45 130 133 doi 10 1016 j jrp 2010 11 010 Chirumbolo A Leone L 2010 Personality and politics The role of the HEXACO model of personality in predicting ideology and voting Personality and Individual Differences 49 43 48 doi 10 1016 j paid 2010 03 004 Zettler I Hilbig B E 2010 Attitudes of the selfless Explaining political orientation with altruism Personality and Individual Differences 48 3 338 342 doi 10 1016 j paid 2009 11 002 Anglim Jeromy Dunlop Patrick D Wee Serena Horwood Sharon Wood Joshua K Marty Andrew May 2022 Personality and intelligence A meta analysis Psychological Bulletin 148 5 6 301 336 doi 10 1037 bul0000373 ISSN 1939 1455 S2CID 253344751 a b Pletzer Jan Luca Oostrom Janneke De Vries Reinout August 2020 HEXACO Personality and Organizational Citizenship Behavior A Domain and Facet Level Meta Analysis Academy of Management Proceedings 2020 1 10335 doi 10 5465 ambpp 2020 10335abstract ISSN 0065 0668 Soutter Alistair Raymond Bryce Bates Timothy C Mottus Rene 2020 05 08 Big Five and HEXACO Personality Traits Proenvironmental Attitudes and Behaviors A Meta Analysis Perspectives on Psychological Science 15 4 913 941 doi 10 1177 1745691620903019 ISSN 1745 6916 PMC 7333518 PMID 32384257 S2CID 218563688 Anglim Jeromy Horwood Sharon Smillie Luke D Marrero Rosario J Wood Joshua K April 2020 Predicting psychological and subjective well being from personality A meta analysis Psychological Bulletin 146 4 279 323 doi 10 1037 bul0000226 ISSN 1939 1455 PMID 31944795 S2CID 210698453 Goldberg L R 1992 The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure Psychological Assessment 4 26 42 doi 10 1037 1040 3590 4 1 26 S2CID 144709415 De Raad B Al Et Mlacic Boris Church A Timothy Katigbak Marcia S Ostendorf Fritz Hrebickova Martina Di Blas Lisa Szirmak Zsofia 2010 Only three personality factors are fully replicable across languages Reply to Ashton and Lee Journal of Research in Personality 44 4 442 445 doi 10 1016 j jrp 2010 05 005 Becker P 1999 Beyond the Big Five Personality and Individual Differences 26 3 511 530 doi 10 1016 s0191 8869 98 00168 8 Larsen R J amp Buss D M 2008 Personality Psychology Domains of knowledge about human behaviour third edition New York NY McGraw Hill External links editWebsite for HEXACO PI R including interactive online administration as well as free downloading for academic research and teaching purposes The H Factor of Personality Why Some People are Manipulative Self Entitled Materialistic and Exploitive And Why It Matters for Everyone This book is written for the general audience and explores the importance of the Honesty Humility factor in various aspects of people s lives The International Personality Item Pool has a public domain collection of scales that measure the HEXACO traits Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title HEXACO model of personality structure amp oldid 1187432388, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.