fbpx
Wikipedia

Goursat's lemma

Goursat's lemma, named after the French mathematician Édouard Goursat, is an algebraic theorem about subgroups of the direct product of two groups.

It can be stated more generally in a Goursat variety (and consequently it also holds in any Maltsev variety), from which one recovers a more general version of Zassenhaus' butterfly lemma. In this form, Goursat's lemma also implies the snake lemma.

Groups edit

Goursat's lemma for groups can be stated as follows.

Let  ,   be groups, and let   be a subgroup of   such that the two projections   and   are surjective (i.e.,   is a subdirect product of   and  ). Let   be the kernel of   and   the kernel of  . One can identify   as a normal subgroup of  , and   as a normal subgroup of  . Then the image of   in   is the graph of an isomorphism  . One then obtains a bijection between:
  1. Subgroups of   which project onto both factors,
  2. Triples   with   normal in  ,   normal in   and   isomorphism of   onto  .

An immediate consequence of this is that the subdirect product of two groups can be described as a fiber product and vice versa.

Notice that if   is any subgroup of   (the projections   and   need not be surjective), then the projections from   onto   and   are surjective. Then one can apply Goursat's lemma to  .

To motivate the proof, consider the slice   in  , for any arbitrary  . By the surjectivity of the projection map to  , this has a non trivial intersection with  . Then essentially, this intersection represents exactly one particular coset of  . Indeed, if we have elements   with   and  , then   being a group, we get that  , and hence,  . It follows that   and   lie in the same coset of  . Thus the intersection of   with every "horizontal" slice isomorphic to   is exactly one particular coset of   in  . By an identical argument, the intersection of   with every "vertical" slice isomorphic to   is exactly one particular coset of   in  .

All the cosets of   are present in the group  , and by the above argument, there is an exact 1:1 correspondence between them. The proof below further shows that the map is an isomorphism.

Proof edit

Before proceeding with the proof,   and   are shown to be normal in   and  , respectively. It is in this sense that   and   can be identified as normal in G and G', respectively.

Since   is a homomorphism, its kernel N is normal in H. Moreover, given  , there exists  , since   is surjective. Therefore,   is normal in G, viz:

 .

It follows that   is normal in   since

 .

The proof that   is normal in   proceeds in a similar manner.

Given the identification of   with  , we can write   and   instead of   and  ,  . Similarly, we can write   and  ,  .

On to the proof. Consider the map   defined by  . The image of   under this map is  . Since   is surjective, this relation is the graph of a well-defined function   provided   for every  , essentially an application of the vertical line test.

Since   (more properly,  ), we have  . Thus  , whence  , that is,  .

Furthermore, for every   we have  . It follows that this function is a group homomorphism.

By symmetry,   is the graph of a well-defined homomorphism  . These two homomorphisms are clearly inverse to each other and thus are indeed isomorphisms.

Goursat varieties edit

As a consequence of Goursat's theorem, one can derive a very general version on the Jordan–HölderSchreier theorem in Goursat varieties.

References edit

  • Édouard Goursat, "Sur les substitutions orthogonales et les divisions régulières de l'espace", Annales Scientifiques de l'École Normale Supérieure (1889), Volume: 6, pages 9–102
  • J. Lambek (1996). "The Butterfly and the Serpent". In Aldo Ursini; Paulo Agliano (eds.). Logic and Algebra. CRC Press. pp. 161–180. ISBN 978-0-8247-9606-8.
  • Kenneth A. Ribet (Autumn 1976), "Galois Action on Division Points of Abelian Varieties with Real Multiplications", American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 98, No. 3, 751–804.
  • A. Carboni, G.M. Kelly and M.C. Pedicchio (1993), Some remarks on Mal'tsev and Goursat categories, Applied Categorical Structures, Vol. 4, 385–421.

goursat, lemma, confused, with, goursat, integral, lemma, from, complex, analysis, named, after, french, mathematician, Édouard, goursat, algebraic, theorem, about, subgroups, direct, product, groups, stated, more, generally, goursat, variety, consequently, al. Not to be confused with Goursat s integral lemma from complex analysis Goursat s lemma named after the French mathematician Edouard Goursat is an algebraic theorem about subgroups of the direct product of two groups It can be stated more generally in a Goursat variety and consequently it also holds in any Maltsev variety from which one recovers a more general version of Zassenhaus butterfly lemma In this form Goursat s lemma also implies the snake lemma Contents 1 Groups 1 1 Proof 2 Goursat varieties 3 ReferencesGroups editGoursat s lemma for groups can be stated as follows Let G displaystyle G nbsp G displaystyle G nbsp be groups and let H displaystyle H nbsp be a subgroup of G G displaystyle G times G nbsp such that the two projections p 1 H G displaystyle p 1 H to G nbsp and p 2 H G displaystyle p 2 H to G nbsp are surjective i e H displaystyle H nbsp is a subdirect product of G displaystyle G nbsp and G displaystyle G nbsp Let N displaystyle N nbsp be the kernel of p 2 displaystyle p 2 nbsp and N displaystyle N nbsp the kernel of p 1 displaystyle p 1 nbsp One can identify N displaystyle N nbsp as a normal subgroup of G displaystyle G nbsp and N displaystyle N nbsp as a normal subgroup of G displaystyle G nbsp Then the image of H displaystyle H nbsp in G N G N displaystyle G N times G N nbsp is the graph of an isomorphism G N G N displaystyle G N cong G N nbsp One then obtains a bijection between Subgroups of G G displaystyle G times G nbsp which project onto both factors Triples N N f displaystyle N N f nbsp with N displaystyle N nbsp normal in G displaystyle G nbsp N displaystyle N nbsp normal in G displaystyle G nbsp and f displaystyle f nbsp isomorphism of G N displaystyle G N nbsp onto G N displaystyle G N nbsp An immediate consequence of this is that the subdirect product of two groups can be described as a fiber product and vice versa Notice that if H displaystyle H nbsp is any subgroup of G G displaystyle G times G nbsp the projections p 1 H G displaystyle p 1 H to G nbsp and p 2 H G displaystyle p 2 H to G nbsp need not be surjective then the projections from H displaystyle H nbsp onto p 1 H displaystyle p 1 H nbsp and p 2 H displaystyle p 2 H nbsp are surjective Then one can apply Goursat s lemma to H p 1 H p 2 H displaystyle H leq p 1 H times p 2 H nbsp To motivate the proof consider the slice S g G displaystyle S g times G nbsp in G G displaystyle G times G nbsp for any arbitrary g G displaystyle g in G nbsp By the surjectivity of the projection map to G displaystyle G nbsp this has a non trivial intersection with H displaystyle H nbsp Then essentially this intersection represents exactly one particular coset of N displaystyle N nbsp Indeed if we have elements g a g b S H displaystyle g a g b in S cap H nbsp with a p N G displaystyle a in pN subset G nbsp and b q N G displaystyle b in qN subset G nbsp then H displaystyle H nbsp being a group we get that e a b 1 H displaystyle e ab 1 in H nbsp and hence e a b 1 N displaystyle e ab 1 in N nbsp It follows that g a displaystyle g a nbsp and g b displaystyle g b nbsp lie in the same coset of N displaystyle N nbsp Thus the intersection of H displaystyle H nbsp with every horizontal slice isomorphic to G G G displaystyle G in G times G nbsp is exactly one particular coset of N displaystyle N nbsp in G displaystyle G nbsp By an identical argument the intersection of H displaystyle H nbsp with every vertical slice isomorphic to G G G displaystyle G in G times G nbsp is exactly one particular coset of N displaystyle N nbsp in G displaystyle G nbsp All the cosets of N N displaystyle N N nbsp are present in the group H displaystyle H nbsp and by the above argument there is an exact 1 1 correspondence between them The proof below further shows that the map is an isomorphism Proof edit Before proceeding with the proof N displaystyle N nbsp and N displaystyle N nbsp are shown to be normal in G e displaystyle G times e nbsp and e G displaystyle e times G nbsp respectively It is in this sense that N displaystyle N nbsp and N displaystyle N nbsp can be identified as normal in G and G respectively Since p 2 displaystyle p 2 nbsp is a homomorphism its kernel N is normal in H Moreover given g G displaystyle g in G nbsp there exists h g g H displaystyle h g g in H nbsp since p 1 displaystyle p 1 nbsp is surjective Therefore p 1 N displaystyle p 1 N nbsp is normal in G viz g p 1 N p 1 h p 1 N p 1 h N p 1 N h p 1 N g displaystyle gp 1 N p 1 h p 1 N p 1 hN p 1 Nh p 1 N g nbsp It follows that N displaystyle N nbsp is normal in G e displaystyle G times e nbsp since g e N g e p 1 N e g p 1 N e p 1 N g e p 1 N e g e N g e displaystyle g e N g e p 1 N times e gp 1 N times e p 1 N g times e p 1 N times e g e N g e nbsp The proof that N displaystyle N nbsp is normal in e G displaystyle e times G nbsp proceeds in a similar manner Given the identification of G displaystyle G nbsp with G e displaystyle G times e nbsp we can write G N displaystyle G N nbsp and g N displaystyle gN nbsp instead of G e N displaystyle G times e N nbsp and g e N displaystyle g e N nbsp g G displaystyle g in G nbsp Similarly we can write G N displaystyle G N nbsp and g N displaystyle g N nbsp g G displaystyle g in G nbsp On to the proof Consider the map H G N G N displaystyle H to G N times G N nbsp defined by g g g N g N displaystyle g g mapsto gN g N nbsp The image of H displaystyle H nbsp under this map is g N g N g g H displaystyle gN g N mid g g in H nbsp Since H G N displaystyle H to G N nbsp is surjective this relation is the graph of a well defined function G N G N displaystyle G N to G N nbsp provided g 1 N g 2 N g 1 N g 2 N displaystyle g 1 N g 2 N implies g 1 N g 2 N nbsp for every g 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 H displaystyle g 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 in H nbsp essentially an application of the vertical line test Since g 1 N g 2 N displaystyle g 1 N g 2 N nbsp more properly g 1 e N g 2 e N displaystyle g 1 e N g 2 e N nbsp we have g 2 1 g 1 e N H displaystyle g 2 1 g 1 e in N subset H nbsp Thus e g 2 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 1 g 1 g 1 g 2 1 g 1 e 1 H displaystyle e g 2 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 1 g 1 g 1 g 2 1 g 1 e 1 in H nbsp whence e g 2 1 g 1 N displaystyle e g 2 1 g 1 in N nbsp that is g 1 N g 2 N displaystyle g 1 N g 2 N nbsp Furthermore for every g 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 H displaystyle g 1 g 1 g 2 g 2 in H nbsp we have g 1 g 2 g 1 g 2 H displaystyle g 1 g 2 g 1 g 2 in H nbsp It follows that this function is a group homomorphism By symmetry g N g N g g H displaystyle g N gN mid g g in H nbsp is the graph of a well defined homomorphism G N G N displaystyle G N to G N nbsp These two homomorphisms are clearly inverse to each other and thus are indeed isomorphisms Goursat varieties editThis section needs expansion You can help by adding to it April 2015 As a consequence of Goursat s theorem one can derive a very general version on the Jordan Holder Schreier theorem in Goursat varieties References editEdouard Goursat Sur les substitutions orthogonales et les divisions regulieres de l espace Annales Scientifiques de l Ecole Normale Superieure 1889 Volume 6 pages 9 102 J Lambek 1996 The Butterfly and the Serpent In Aldo Ursini Paulo Agliano eds Logic and Algebra CRC Press pp 161 180 ISBN 978 0 8247 9606 8 Kenneth A Ribet Autumn 1976 Galois Action on Division Points of Abelian Varieties with Real Multiplications American Journal of Mathematics Vol 98 No 3 751 804 A Carboni G M Kelly and M C Pedicchio 1993 Some remarks on Mal tsev and Goursat categories Applied Categorical Structures Vol 4 385 421 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Goursat 27s lemma amp oldid 1196944801, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.