fbpx
Wikipedia

News embargo

In journalism and public relations, a news embargo or press embargo is a request or requirement by a source that the information or news provided by that source not be published until a certain date or certain conditions have been met. They are often used by businesses making a product announcement, by medical journals, and by government officials announcing policy initiatives; the media is given advance knowledge of details being held secret so that reports can be prepared to coincide with the announcement date and yet still meet press time.[1]

A sign at a U.S. National Agricultural Statistics Service briefing on crop production, held at a secure data room where politicians and journalists are briefed on embargoed data two hours before its release

In theory, press embargoes reduce inaccuracy in the reporting of breaking stories by reducing the incentive for journalists to cut corners by writing up information quickly in hopes of "scooping" the competition. A similar concept are review embargoes in video games, computer hardware and films; in these, reviewers are given early access to content or products in exchange for keeping review results secret until the embargo is lifted, preventing inaccuracies in reviews or lackluster sales at launch or to allow any flaws, bugs or other inconsistencies discovered by reviewers to be fixed before launch, preventing problems after launch.[2][3][4]

The understanding is that if the embargo is broken by reporting before then, the source will retaliate by restricting access to further information by that journalist or their publication, giving them a long-term disadvantage relative to more cooperative outlets. Embargoes are usually arranged in advance as "gentlemen's agreements." However, sometimes publicists will send embargoed press releases to newsrooms unsolicited in hopes that they will respect the embargo date without having first agreed to do so—the phrase "For Immediate Release" often found at the top of press releases indicates that the information in the release is not embargoed.

News organizations sometimes break embargoes and report information before the embargo expires, either accidentally (due to miscommunication in the newsroom) or intentionally (to get the jump on their competitors). Breaking an embargo is typically considered a serious breach of trust and can result in the source barring the offending news outlet from receiving advance information for a long period of time.

News embargoes are one of several ways a source can influence media presentation of the information they provide; others include providing information "on background" or "not for attribution", limiting or providing "access", or even direct government or market intervention against the reporters or media company. (See confidentiality terminology in journalism for a full discussion of these.) The manner in which journalists react to these and other attempts to influence coverage are a matter of journalistic ethics.

An example of an embargo being deliberately broken occurred on 19 July 2017. The television presenter and former tabloid editor Piers Morgan antagonised other journalists when he intentionally breached a BBC news embargo. This was in connection with the publication of details of BBC presenters earning more than £150,000 annually. He announced the details via his Twitter account about an hour earlier than the report's indicated time of publication. He excused his action by describing it as a 'scoop'.[5][6][7]

Examples edit

 
Journalists' mobile phones are locked away at a U.S. National Agricultural Statistics Service briefing on crop production figures before the public release of information at noon.
  • Biweekly press briefings from the International Monetary Fund are typically embargoed until 10:30 a.m. Washington time, 1430 GMT (for synchronised effect on global stock markets).
  • Reporters who accompanied U.S. President George W. Bush on a Thanksgiving visit to Iraq in 2003 were embargoed from filing until the President left the country. They were told that, in the interests of security, the trip would be canceled if news broke before its conclusion.[8]
  • The Ministry of Defence in the United Kingdom informed a handful of journalism outlets that Prince Harry would be serving in Afghanistan, on condition that the information not be released until the end of his deployment. The information was leaked after about two months, and officials agreed to end the embargo. The prince was immediately removed from the battlefield, reportedly for his safety and that of his fellow soldiers.
  • In Canada, Australia and other countries, prior to the release of the budget and other important government announcements, reporters are held in a "lockup" so that they can prepare stories in advance. They are not permitted to file until after the official announcement (for example, after the Minister of Finance rises to deliver the budget speech). Lockups are particularly aimed at preventing insider trading on the basis of leaked government announcements.[9][10] It is uncertain if a similar lockup is done in the United States when the Federal Reserve Board is preparing to adjust an interest rate.
  • The New York Times in 2008 prompted suppression of the story of the kidnapping of David Rohde (their reporter) in news outlets and on Wikipedia until his return in 2009. This example, in which the instigator of the embargo is not the source, may be a case of self-censorship instead.

On articles in scientific journals edit

News embargoes are commonly applied on information of health-related news regarding upcoming medical journal articles. All major medical journals, including the New England Journal of Medicine, the Journal of the American Medical Association, and The Lancet, have publication embargoes.

The JAMA embargo probably dates back to the editorship of Morris Fishbein, from 1924 to 1949, and holds until 15:00 Central Time on the day before the cover date of the issue. Journalists who agree to not publish (in print, on television, on radio, or via Internet) until that time the information contained in a manuscript to be published by the journal receive advance copies of the journal by mail during the week before publication. For selected articles, press releases and news release videos are also prepared by science writers and released to journalists during that week.[11]

The reasons given for such embargoes are twofold. First, they enable journalists to produce more comprehensive and accurate coverage, as the embargo provides time in which they can research the background to a story and thus publish "backgrounders" along with the story's release. Second, they enable doctors and scientists to receive and to analyze medical studies before the general public does, enabling them to be better informed when called upon to comment or to react by journalists or by patients. However, some object to the medical news embargo system, claiming that it is driven by profit motives on the parts of the medical journals.[11][12]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ Delkic, Melina (11 August 2018). "Ready, Set, Embargo". New York Times. Retrieved 20 August 2019.
  2. ^ Solca, Bogdan. "New Nvidia Turing RTX 2000-series key features detailed ahead of review embargo lift". Notebookcheck.
  3. ^ Smith, Callum (July 1, 2020). "Ghost Of Tsushima: Review embargo lift date revealed and it's fantastic news!". HITC.
  4. ^ "Review Embargoes: What are They, and Do They Help?". Den of Geek. November 23, 2017.
  5. ^ Oppenheim, Maya (19 July 2017). "Piers Morgan leaks BBC salaries by breaking embargo and calls it a scoop". The Independent. Archived from the original on 2022-06-18. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  6. ^ York, Chris (19 July 2017). "Piers Morgan Branded 'Bellend' For Breaking BBC Pay Embargo". HuffPost. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  7. ^ Powell, Tom (19 July 2017). "Piers Morgan blasted for 'leaking' BBC salaries and claiming 'scoop'". London Evening Standard. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  8. ^ Moniz, Dave; Keen, Judy (November 27, 2003). "Secrecy, Precautions Minimized Risk". USA Today. Retrieved December 2, 2006.
  9. ^ Hildebrandt, Amber (February 5, 2006). "CBC News Indepth: Federal Budget 2006". Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. Retrieved December 2, 2006.
  10. ^ Allan, Tony (May 14, 2007). . Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved July 27, 2007.
  11. ^ a b Fontanarosa, Phil B.; Flanagin, Annette & DeAngelis, Cathering D. (December 13, 2000). "The Journal's Policy Regarding Release of Information to the Public". Journal of the American Medical Association. 284 (22): 2929–2931. doi:10.1001/jama.284.22.2929. PMID 11147991.
  12. ^ Roberts, John (April 30, 1994). "Medicine and the Media: News Embargoes—in Whose Interest?". British Medical Journal. 308 (6937): 1168–1169. doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6937.1168a. S2CID 70573709.

Further reading edit

  • d'Adler, MA (1988). "The Transfer of Medical Information: A Journalist's View". International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 4 (1): 59–63. doi:10.1017/S0266462300003263. PMID 10287116. S2CID 23626893.
  • Fontanarosa, Phil B.; DeAngelis, Catherine D. (August 14, 2002). "The Importance of the Journal Embargo". Journal of the American Medical Association. 288 (6): 748–750. doi:10.1001/jama.288.6.748. PMID 12169080.—a detailed report on a news embargo on a story about a scientific study and the consequences of it being breached by journalists
  • Kassirer, Jerome P. & Angell, Marcia (June 2, 1994). "Violations of the Embargo and a New Policy on Early Publicity". New England Journal of Medicine. 330 (22): 1608–1609. doi:10.1056/NEJM199406023302211. PMID 8177252.—the reaction of the NEJM and the National Cancer Institute to a violation of an embargo by ABC's World News Tonight in 1994
  • Kiernan, Vincent (1997). "Ingelfinger, Embargoes, and Other Controls on the Dissemination of Science News". Science Communication (Abstract). 18 (4): 297–319. doi:10.1177/1075547097018004002. S2CID 144786190. —a study of whether "journal editors may [...] be using [news embargoes and the Ingelfinger Rule] to enhance the status of their publications, with an eye toward attracting better scientific papers, expanding circulation, and luring advertising"
  • Kiernan, Vincent (1998). "Changing Embargoes and the New York Times's Coverage of the Journal of the American Medical Association". Science Communication (Abstract). 19 (3): 212–221. doi:10.1177/1075547098019003003. S2CID 144418364.—a report that embargoed early access to journals, granted to medical and science journalists, is an information subsidy that encourages greater coverage of the journals in news media
  • Loscalzo, Joseph; Bonow, Robert O. & Jacobs, Alice K. (2004). "Coronary Calcium Screening and the American Heart Association News Embargo". Circulation. 110 (23): 3504–3505. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.0000151096.25445.34. PMID 15583087.—a detailed report on a news embargo on a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and the consequences of it being breached by journalists
  • Marshall, Eliot (October 30, 1998). "Embargoes: Good, Bad, or 'Necessary Evil'?". Science. 282 (5390): 860–867. doi:10.1126/science.282.5390.860. PMID 9841429. S2CID 32711052.
  • Molitor, Fred (1993). "Accuracy in Science News Reporting by Newspapers: The Case of Aspirin for the Prevention of Heart Attacks". Health Communication. 5 (3): 209–224. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc0503_4.—a study of how a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine was reported by journalists who "omitt[ed] information, sensationaliz[ed] the results of the study, and [made] incorrect generalizations", and "may have been responsible for promoting unhealthy behaviors".
  • Morgan, PP (February 1, 1984). "Scientific Journals and the News Media: Partners or Competitors?". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 130 (3): 252. PMC 1875359. PMID 6692201.
  • Relman, AS (April 7, 1988). "Reporting the Aspirin Study: The Journal and the Media". New England Journal of Medicine. 318 (14): 918–920. doi:10.1056/NEJM198804073181409. PMID 3352675.
  • Schecter, Danny (2006). When News Lies: Media Complicity and the Iraq War. Select Books (NY). ISBN 978-1-59079-073-1.
  • Stacey, J. (October 11, 1985). "The Press Embargo: Friend or Foe?". Journal of the American Medical Association. 254 (14): 1965. doi:10.1001/jama.254.14.1965. PMID 3900440.
  • Wilkes, Michael S. (February 1, 1997). "The Public Dissemination of Medical Research: Problems and Solutions". Journal of Health Communication. 2 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1080/108107397127888. PMID 10977233.[permanent dead link]

External links edit

  • 1st Hyde Park - Amendment proposes online news embargo - 13/11/06
  • The New York Times - Early Report By ABC News Is Criticized - 14/04/94
  • The Truth About Cars - Embargo This! - 04/01/05
  • Embargo Watch
  • Reserve Bank of Australia - Lockup procedures

news, embargo, journalism, public, relations, news, embargo, press, embargo, request, requirement, source, that, information, news, provided, that, source, published, until, certain, date, certain, conditions, have, been, they, often, used, businesses, making,. In journalism and public relations a news embargo or press embargo is a request or requirement by a source that the information or news provided by that source not be published until a certain date or certain conditions have been met They are often used by businesses making a product announcement by medical journals and by government officials announcing policy initiatives the media is given advance knowledge of details being held secret so that reports can be prepared to coincide with the announcement date and yet still meet press time 1 A sign at a U S National Agricultural Statistics Service briefing on crop production held at a secure data room where politicians and journalists are briefed on embargoed data two hours before its release In theory press embargoes reduce inaccuracy in the reporting of breaking stories by reducing the incentive for journalists to cut corners by writing up information quickly in hopes of scooping the competition A similar concept are review embargoes in video games computer hardware and films in these reviewers are given early access to content or products in exchange for keeping review results secret until the embargo is lifted preventing inaccuracies in reviews or lackluster sales at launch or to allow any flaws bugs or other inconsistencies discovered by reviewers to be fixed before launch preventing problems after launch 2 3 4 The understanding is that if the embargo is broken by reporting before then the source will retaliate by restricting access to further information by that journalist or their publication giving them a long term disadvantage relative to more cooperative outlets Embargoes are usually arranged in advance as gentlemen s agreements However sometimes publicists will send embargoed press releases to newsrooms unsolicited in hopes that they will respect the embargo date without having first agreed to do so the phrase For Immediate Release often found at the top of press releases indicates that the information in the release is not embargoed News organizations sometimes break embargoes and report information before the embargo expires either accidentally due to miscommunication in the newsroom or intentionally to get the jump on their competitors Breaking an embargo is typically considered a serious breach of trust and can result in the source barring the offending news outlet from receiving advance information for a long period of time News embargoes are one of several ways a source can influence media presentation of the information they provide others include providing information on background or not for attribution limiting or providing access or even direct government or market intervention against the reporters or media company See confidentiality terminology in journalism for a full discussion of these The manner in which journalists react to these and other attempts to influence coverage are a matter of journalistic ethics An example of an embargo being deliberately broken occurred on 19 July 2017 The television presenter and former tabloid editor Piers Morgan antagonised other journalists when he intentionally breached a BBC news embargo This was in connection with the publication of details of BBC presenters earning more than 150 000 annually He announced the details via his Twitter account about an hour earlier than the report s indicated time of publication He excused his action by describing it as a scoop 5 6 7 Contents 1 Examples 2 On articles in scientific journals 3 See also 4 References 5 Further reading 6 External linksExamples edit nbsp Journalists mobile phones are locked away at a U S National Agricultural Statistics Service briefing on crop production figures before the public release of information at noon Biweekly press briefings from the International Monetary Fund are typically embargoed until 10 30 a m Washington time 1430 GMT for synchronised effect on global stock markets Reporters who accompanied U S President George W Bush on a Thanksgiving visit to Iraq in 2003 were embargoed from filing until the President left the country They were told that in the interests of security the trip would be canceled if news broke before its conclusion 8 The Ministry of Defence in the United Kingdom informed a handful of journalism outlets that Prince Harry would be serving in Afghanistan on condition that the information not be released until the end of his deployment The information was leaked after about two months and officials agreed to end the embargo The prince was immediately removed from the battlefield reportedly for his safety and that of his fellow soldiers In Canada Australia and other countries prior to the release of the budget and other important government announcements reporters are held in a lockup so that they can prepare stories in advance They are not permitted to file until after the official announcement for example after the Minister of Finance rises to deliver the budget speech Lockups are particularly aimed at preventing insider trading on the basis of leaked government announcements 9 10 It is uncertain if a similar lockup is done in the United States when the Federal Reserve Board is preparing to adjust an interest rate The New York Times in 2008 prompted suppression of the story of the kidnapping of David Rohde their reporter in news outlets and on Wikipedia until his return in 2009 This example in which the instigator of the embargo is not the source may be a case of self censorship instead On articles in scientific journals editMain article Ingelfinger rule News embargoes are commonly applied on information of health related news regarding upcoming medical journal articles All major medical journals including the New England Journal of Medicine the Journal of the American Medical Association and The Lancet have publication embargoes The JAMA embargo probably dates back to the editorship of Morris Fishbein from 1924 to 1949 and holds until 15 00 Central Time on the day before the cover date of the issue Journalists who agree to not publish in print on television on radio or via Internet until that time the information contained in a manuscript to be published by the journal receive advance copies of the journal by mail during the week before publication For selected articles press releases and news release videos are also prepared by science writers and released to journalists during that week 11 The reasons given for such embargoes are twofold First they enable journalists to produce more comprehensive and accurate coverage as the embargo provides time in which they can research the background to a story and thus publish backgrounders along with the story s release Second they enable doctors and scientists to receive and to analyze medical studies before the general public does enabling them to be better informed when called upon to comment or to react by journalists or by patients However some object to the medical news embargo system claiming that it is driven by profit motives on the parts of the medical journals 11 12 See also edit nbsp Journalism portal Damage control Journalism sourcing Media bias Media democracy Media transparency Publication ban Press censorshipReferences edit Delkic Melina 11 August 2018 Ready Set Embargo New York Times Retrieved 20 August 2019 Solca Bogdan New Nvidia Turing RTX 2000 series key features detailed ahead of review embargo lift Notebookcheck Smith Callum July 1 2020 Ghost Of Tsushima Review embargo lift date revealed and it s fantastic news HITC Review Embargoes What are They and Do They Help Den of Geek November 23 2017 Oppenheim Maya 19 July 2017 Piers Morgan leaks BBC salaries by breaking embargo and calls it a scoop The Independent Archived from the original on 2022 06 18 Retrieved 16 July 2018 York Chris 19 July 2017 Piers Morgan Branded Bellend For Breaking BBC Pay Embargo HuffPost Retrieved 16 July 2018 Powell Tom 19 July 2017 Piers Morgan blasted for leaking BBC salaries and claiming scoop London Evening Standard Retrieved 16 July 2018 Moniz Dave Keen Judy November 27 2003 Secrecy Precautions Minimized Risk USA Today Retrieved December 2 2006 Hildebrandt Amber February 5 2006 CBC News Indepth Federal Budget 2006 Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Retrieved December 2 2006 Allan Tony May 14 2007 ABC Rural Victorian Country Hour Blog Locked up with the Federal Budget Australian Broadcasting Corporation Archived from the original on March 3 2016 Retrieved July 27 2007 a b Fontanarosa Phil B Flanagin Annette amp DeAngelis Cathering D December 13 2000 The Journal s Policy Regarding Release of Information to the Public Journal of the American Medical Association 284 22 2929 2931 doi 10 1001 jama 284 22 2929 PMID 11147991 Roberts John April 30 1994 Medicine and the Media News Embargoes in Whose Interest British Medical Journal 308 6937 1168 1169 doi 10 1136 bmj 308 6937 1168a S2CID 70573709 Further reading editd Adler MA 1988 The Transfer of Medical Information A Journalist s View International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 4 1 59 63 doi 10 1017 S0266462300003263 PMID 10287116 S2CID 23626893 Fontanarosa Phil B DeAngelis Catherine D August 14 2002 The Importance of the Journal Embargo Journal of the American Medical Association 288 6 748 750 doi 10 1001 jama 288 6 748 PMID 12169080 a detailed report on a news embargo on a story about a scientific study and the consequences of it being breached by journalists Kassirer Jerome P amp Angell Marcia June 2 1994 Violations of the Embargo and a New Policy on Early Publicity New England Journal of Medicine 330 22 1608 1609 doi 10 1056 NEJM199406023302211 PMID 8177252 the reaction of the NEJM and the National Cancer Institute to a violation of an embargo by ABC s World News Tonight in 1994 Kiernan Vincent 1997 Ingelfinger Embargoes and Other Controls on the Dissemination of Science News Science Communication Abstract 18 4 297 319 doi 10 1177 1075547097018004002 S2CID 144786190 a study of whether journal editors may be using news embargoes and the Ingelfinger Rule to enhance the status of their publications with an eye toward attracting better scientific papers expanding circulation and luring advertising Kiernan Vincent 1998 Changing Embargoes and the New York Times s Coverage of the Journal of the American Medical Association Science Communication Abstract 19 3 212 221 doi 10 1177 1075547098019003003 S2CID 144418364 a report that embargoed early access to journals granted to medical and science journalists is an information subsidy that encourages greater coverage of the journals in news media Loscalzo Joseph Bonow Robert O amp Jacobs Alice K 2004 Coronary Calcium Screening and the American Heart Association News Embargo Circulation 110 23 3504 3505 doi 10 1161 01 CIR 0000151096 25445 34 PMID 15583087 a detailed report on a news embargo on a Scientific Statement from the American Heart Association and the consequences of it being breached by journalists Marshall Eliot October 30 1998 Embargoes Good Bad or Necessary Evil Science 282 5390 860 867 doi 10 1126 science 282 5390 860 PMID 9841429 S2CID 32711052 Molitor Fred 1993 Accuracy in Science News Reporting by Newspapers The Case of Aspirin for the Prevention of Heart Attacks Health Communication 5 3 209 224 doi 10 1207 s15327027hc0503 4 a study of how a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine was reported by journalists who omitt ed information sensationaliz ed the results of the study and made incorrect generalizations and may have been responsible for promoting unhealthy behaviors Morgan PP February 1 1984 Scientific Journals and the News Media Partners or Competitors Canadian Medical Association Journal 130 3 252 PMC 1875359 PMID 6692201 Relman AS April 7 1988 Reporting the Aspirin Study The Journal and the Media New England Journal of Medicine 318 14 918 920 doi 10 1056 NEJM198804073181409 PMID 3352675 Schecter Danny 2006 When News Lies Media Complicity and the Iraq War Select Books NY ISBN 978 1 59079 073 1 Stacey J October 11 1985 The Press Embargo Friend or Foe Journal of the American Medical Association 254 14 1965 doi 10 1001 jama 254 14 1965 PMID 3900440 Wilkes Michael S February 1 1997 The Public Dissemination of Medical Research Problems and Solutions Journal of Health Communication 2 1 3 15 doi 10 1080 108107397127888 PMID 10977233 permanent dead link External links edit1st Hyde Park Amendment proposes online news embargo 13 11 06 The Journalistic The Future of the Embargo The New York Times Early Report By ABC News Is Criticized 14 04 94 The Truth About Cars Embargo This 04 01 05 Embargo Watch Reserve Bank of Australia Lockup procedures Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title News embargo amp oldid 1215327625, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.