Fungi imperfecti

The fungi imperfecti or imperfect fungi are fungi which do not fit into the commonly established taxonomic classifications of fungi that are based on biological species concepts or morphological characteristics of sexual structures because their sexual form of reproduction has never been observed. They are known as imperfect fungi because only their asexual and vegetative phases are known. They have asexual form of reproduction, meaning that these fungi produce their spores asexually, in the process called sporogenesis.

Fungi imperfecti
Conidiophore of Aspergillus sp.
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Fungi
Species
See below.

There are about 25,000 species that have been classified in the deuteromycota and many are basidiomycota or ascomycota anamorphs. Fungi producing the antibiotic penicillin and those that cause athlete's foot and yeast infections are algal fungi. In addition, there are a number of edible imperfect fungi, including the ones that provide the distinctive characteristics of Roquefort and Camembert cheese.

Other, more informal names besides Deuteromycota ("Deuteromycetes") and fungi imperfecti are anamorphic fungi, or mitosporic fungi, but these are terms without taxonomic rank. Examples are Alternaria, Colletotrichum, Trichoderma etc.

Problems in taxonomic classification

Although Fungi imperfecti/Deuteromycota is no longer formally accepted as a taxon, many of the fungi it included have yet to find a place in modern fungal classification. This is because most fungi are classified based on characteristics of the fruiting bodies and spores produced during sexual reproduction, and members of the Deuteromycota have been observed to reproduce only asexually or produce no spores.

Mycologists are unique among those who study extant organisms in using a dual system of nomenclature. Dual naming was permitted by Article 59 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (which governs the naming of plants and fungi); however, this was abolished in the 2011 update of the Code.^[1]

Under the former system, a name for an asexually reproducing fungus was considered a form taxon. For example, the ubiquitous and industrially important mold, Aspergillus niger, has no known sexual cycle. Thus Aspergillus niger is considered a form taxon. In contrast, isolates of its close relative, Aspergillus nidulans, revealed it to be the anamorphic stage of a teleomorph (the ascocarp or fruiting body of the sexual reproductive stage of a fungus), which was already named Emericella nidulans. When such a teleomorphic stage is known, that name will take priority over the name of an anamorph (which lacks a sexual reproductive stage). Hence the formerly classified Aspergillus species is now properly called Emericella nidulans.

Phylogeny and taxonomy

Phylogenetic classification of asexually reproducing fungi now commonly uses molecular systematics. Phylogenetic trees constructed from comparative analyses of DNA sequences, such as rRNA, or multigene phylogenies may be used to infer relationships between asexually reproducing fungi and their sexually reproducing counterparts. With these methods, many asexually reproducing fungi have now been placed in the tree of life.^{[citation needed]} However, because phylogenetic methods require sufficient quantities of biological materials (spores or fresh specimens) that are from pure (i.e., uncontaminated) fungal cultures, for many asexual species their exact relationship with other fungal species has yet to be determined. Under the current system of fungal nomenclature, teleomorph names cannot be applied to fungi that lack sexual structures. Classifying and naming asexually reproducing fungi is the subject of ongoing debate in the mycological community.

Historical classification of the imperfect fungi

These groups are no longer formally accepted because they do not adhere to the principle of monophyly.^{[citation needed]} The taxon names are sometimes used informally. In particular, the term 'hyphomycetes' is often used to refer to molds, and the term 'coelomycetes' is used to refer to many asexually reproducing plant pathogens that form discrete fruiting bodies.

Following, a classification of the Fungi imperfecti: Saccardo et al.(1882-1972)^[2]

• Class Hyphomycetes lacking fruiting bodies
  • Order Moniliales (producing spores on simple conidiophores)
  • Order Stilbellales (producing spores on synnemata)
  • Order Tuberculariales (producing spores in sporodochia)
• Class Coelomycetes spores produced in fruiting bodies
  • Order Melanconiales (producing spores in acervuli)
  • Order Sphaeropsidales (producing spores in pycnidia)
• Class Agonomycetes lacking spores

Other, according to Dörfelt (1989):^[3]

• Form-Klasse: Hyphomycetes
  • Form-Ordnung: Agonomycetales
    • Form-Familie: Agonomycetaceae
  • Form-Ordnung: Moniliales
    • Form-Familie: Moniliaceae
    • Form-Familie: Dematiaceae
    • Form-Familie: Stilbellaceae
    • Form-Familie: Tuberculariaceae
• Form-Klasse: Coelomycetes
  • Form-Ordnung: Melanconiales
    • Form-Familie: Melanconiaceae
  • Form-Ordnung: Sphaeropsidales
    • Form-Familie: Sphaeropsidaceae

Other systems of classification are reviewed by (Kendrick 1981).

Common species

Industrially relevant fungi

• Tolypocladium inflatum → from which the immunosuppressant ciclosporin is obtained;^[4]
• Penicillium griseofulvum
• Penicillium roqueforti
• Penicillium camemberti
• Other species of Penicillium are used to improve both the taste and the texture of cheeses^[5]
• Aspergillus oryzae^[6]
• Aspergillus sojae^[7]
• Aspergillus niger^[8]
• Amorphotheca resinae^[9]
• Lecanicillium sp. → these produce conidia which may control certain species of insect pests^[10]
• Other entomopathogenic fungi, including Metarhizium and Beauveria spp.
• Pochonia spp. are under development for control of Nematode pests.

See also

• Forest pathology
• List of mitosporic Ascomycota

References

1. "International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants". International Association for Plant Taxonomy.
2. "Fungi - Wikispecies".
3. Dörfelt, Heinrich (Hrsg.): Lexikon der Mykologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York. 1989.
4. See "Una Historia Ilustrada del Transplante de Órganos" [1] 2008-03-16 at the Wayback Machine (in Spanish).
5. See the following link 2008-09-09 at the Wayback Machine (in Spanish).
6. . Bio-Cat. Archived from the original on 2008-12-04. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
7. . USDA. Archived from the original on 2008-10-12. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
8. . Archived from the original on 2012-03-21. Retrieved 2008-10-02.
9. See this link 2011-07-07 at the Wayback Machine (in Spanish).
10. Cf.[2] 2008-10-06 at the Wayback Machine (in Spanish).

Bibliography

• Goos, R.D. (1956). "Classification of the Fungi lmperfecti". Proceedings of the Iowa Academy of Science. 63: 311–320 – via the Iowa Academy of Science, Inc.
• Gams, W. (1995). "How natural should anamorph genera be?". Canadian Journal of Botany. 73 (Suppl 1): S747–53. doi:10.1139/b95-318.
• Kendrick, B. (2 December 2012) [1981]. "The history of conidial fungi". In Cole, Garry T. (ed.). Biology of Conidial Fungi. Vol. 1. Elsevier. pp. 3–18. ISBN 978-0-323-13899-4.
• Seifert, K.A. (1993). "Integrating anamorphic fungi into the fungal system". In Reynolds, D.R.; Taylor, J.W. (eds.). The Fungal Holomorph: mitotic, meiotic and pleomorphic speciation in fungal systematics. CAB International. pp. 79–85. ISBN 0851988652.
• Taylor, JW (1995). "Making the Deuteromycota redundant: a practical integration of mitosporic and meiosporic fungi". Canadian Journal of Botany. 73 (Suppl 1): S754–9. doi:10.1139/b95-319.