Comet nucleus

The nucleus is the solid, central part of a comet, formerly termed a dirty snowball or an icy dirtball. A cometary nucleus is composed of rock, dust, and frozen gases. When heated by the Sun, the gases sublime and produce an atmosphere surrounding the nucleus known as the coma. The force exerted on the coma by the Sun's radiation pressure and solar wind cause an enormous tail to form, which points away from the Sun. A typical comet nucleus has an albedo of 0.04.^[1] This is blacker than coal, and may be caused by a covering of dust.^[2]

The nucleus of Comet Tempel 1.

Results from the Rosetta and Philae spacecraft show that the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko has no magnetic field, which suggests that magnetism may not have played a role in the early formation of planetesimals.^[3][4] Further, the ALICE spectrograph on Rosetta determined that electrons (within 1 km (0.62 mi) above the comet nucleus) produced from photoionization of water molecules by solar radiation, and not photons from the Sun as thought earlier, are responsible for the degradation of water and carbon dioxide molecules released from the comet nucleus into its coma.^[5][6] On 30 July 2015, scientists reported that the Philae spacecraft, that landed on comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in November 2014, detected at least 16 organic compounds, of which four (including acetamide, acetone, methyl isocyanate and propionaldehyde) were detected for the first time on a comet.^[7][8][9]

Paradigm

Comet nuclei, at ~1 km to at times tens of kilometers, could not be resolved by telescopes. Even current giant telescopes would give just a few pixels on target, assuming nuclei were not obscured by comae when near Earth. An understanding of the nucleus, versus the phenomenon of the coma, had to be deduced, from multiple lines of evidence.

"Flying sandbank"

The "flying sandbank" model, first proposed in the late-1800s, posits a comet as a swarm of bodies, not a discrete object at all. Activity is the loss of both volatiles, and population members.^[10] This model was championed in midcentury by Raymond Lyttleton, along with an origin. As the Sun passed through interstellar nebulosity, material would clump in wake eddies. Some would be lost, but some would remain in heliocentric orbits. The weak capture explained long, eccentric, inclined comet orbits. Ices per se were lacking; volatiles were stored by adsorption on grains.^{[11][12][13][14]}

"Dirty snowball"

Beginning in the 1950s, Fred Lawrence Whipple published his "icy conglomerate" model.^[15][16] This was soon popularized as "dirty snowball." Comet orbits had been determined quite precisely, yet comets were at times recovered "off-schedule," by as much as days. Early comets could be explained by a "resisting medium"- such as "the aether", or the cumulative action of meteoroids against the front of the comet(s).^{[citation needed]} But comets could return both early and late. Whipple argued that a gentle thrust from asymmetric emissions (now "nongravitational forces") better explained comet timing. This required that the emitter have cohesive strength- a single, solid nucleus with some proportion of volatiles. Lyttleton continued publishing flying-sandbank works as late as 1972.^[17] The death knell for the flying sandbank was Halley's Comet. Vega 2 and Giotto images showed a single body, emitting through a small number of jets.^[18][19]

"Icy dirtball"

It has been a long time since comet nuclei could be imagined as frozen snowballs.^[20] Whipple had already postulated a separate crust and interior. Before Halley's 1986 apparition, it appeared that an exposed ice surface would have some finite lifetime, even behind a coma. Halley's nucleus was predicted to be dark, not bright, due to preferential destruction/escape of gases, and retention of refractories.^{[21][22][23][24]} The term dust mantling has been in common use since more than 35 years.^[25]

The Halley results exceeded even these- comets are not merely dark, but among the darkest objects in the Solar System ^[26] Furthermore, prior dust estimates were severe undercounts. Both finer grains and larger pebbles appeared in spacecraft detectors, but not ground telescopes. The volatile fraction also included organics, not merely water and other gases. Dust-ice ratios appeared much closer than thought. Extremely low densities (0.1 to 0.5 g cm-3) were derived.^[27] The nucleus was still assumed to be majority-ice,^[18] perhaps overwhelmingly so.^[19]

Modern theory

Three rendezvous missions aside, Halley was one example. Its unfavorable trajectory also caused brief flybys at extreme speed, at one time. More frequent missions broadened the sample of targets, using more advanced instruments. By chance, events such as the breakups of Shoemaker-Levy 9 and Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 contributed further to human understanding.

Densities were confirmed as quite low, ~0.6 g cm3. Comets were highly porous,^[28] and fragile on micro-^[29] and macro-scales.^[30]

Refractory-to-ice ratios are much higher,^[31] at least 3:1,^[32] possibly ~5:1,^[33] ~6:1,^[34][25] or more.^[35][36][37]

This is a full reversal from the dirty snowball model. The Rosetta science team has coined the term "mineral organices," for minerals and organics with a minor fraction of ices.^[35]

Manx comets, Damocloids, and active asteroids demonstrate that there may be no bright line separating the two categories of objects.

Origin

Main article: Accretion (astrophysics) § Accretion of comets

 

The Helix Nebula has a cometary Oort cloud

Comets, or their precursors, formed in the outer Solar System, possibly millions of years before planet formation.^[38] How and when comets formed is debated, with distinct implications for Solar System formation, dynamics, and geology. Three-dimensional computer simulations indicate the major structural features observed on cometary nuclei can be explained by pairwise low velocity accretion of weak cometesimals.^[39][40] The currently favored creation mechanism is that of the nebular hypothesis, which states that comets are probably a remnant of the original planetesimal "building blocks" from which the planets grew.^[41][42][43]

Astronomers think that comets originate in the Oort cloud, the scattered disk,^[44] and the outer Main Belt.^[45][46][47]

Size

 

Size and color comparison of the largest known comets, including dwarf planet Pluto and natural satellites Mimas and Phobos for scale.

 

Tempel 1 and Hartley 2 compared

Most cometary nuclei are thought to be no more than about 16 kilometers (10 miles) across.^[48] The largest comets that have come inside the orbit of Saturn are 95P/Chiron (≈200 km), C/2002 VQ94 (LINEAR) (≈100 km), Comet of 1729 (≈100 km), Hale–Bopp (≈60 km), 29P (≈60 km), 109P/Swift–Tuttle (≈26 km), and 28P/Neujmin (≈21 km).

The potato-shaped nucleus of Halley's comet (15 × 8 × 8 km)^[48][49] contains equal amounts of ice and dust.

During a flyby in September 2001, the Deep Space 1 spacecraft observed the nucleus of Comet Borrelly and found it to be about half the size (8×4×4 km)^[50] of the nucleus of Halley's Comet.^[48] Borrelly's nucleus was also potato-shaped and had a dark black surface.^[48] Like Halley's Comet, Comet Borrelly only released gas from small areas where holes in the crust exposed the ice to sunlight.

 

C/2006 W3 (Chistensen) – emitting carbon gas

The nucleus of comet Hale–Bopp was estimated to be 60 ± 20 km in diameter.^[51] Hale-Bopp appeared bright to the unaided eye because its unusually large nucleus gave off a great deal of dust and gas.

The nucleus of P/2007 R5 is probably only 100–200 meters in diameter.^[52]

The largest centaurs (unstable, planet crossing, icy asteroids) are estimated to be 250 km to 300 km in diameter. Three of the largest would include 10199 Chariklo (258 km), 2060 Chiron (230 km), and (523727) 2014 NW65 (≈220 km).

Known comets have been estimated to have an average density of 0.6 g/cm³.^[53] Below is a list of comets that have had estimated sizes, densities, and masses.

Name	Dimensions km	Density g/cm^3	Mass kg^[54]
Halley's Comet	15 × 8 × 8^[48]^[49]	0.6^[55]	3×10^14
Tempel 1	7.6×4.9^[56]	0.62^[53]	7.9×10^13
19P/Borrelly	8×4×4^[50]	0.3^[53]	2×10^13
81P/Wild	5.5×4.0×3.3^[57]	0.6^[53]	2.3×10^13
67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko	See article on 67P	0.4^[58]	(1.0±0.1)×10^13^[59]

Composition

It was once thought that water-ice was the predominant constituent of the nucleus.^[60] In the dirty snowball model, dust is ejected when the ice retreats.^[61] Based on this, about 80% of the Halley's Comet nucleus would be water ice, and frozen carbon monoxide (CO) makes up another 15%. Much of the remainder is frozen carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia.^[48] Scientists think that other comets are chemically similar to Halley's Comet. The nucleus of Halley's Comet is also an extremely dark black. Scientists think that the surface of the comet, and perhaps most other comets, is covered with a black crust of dust and rock that covers most of the ice. These comets release gas only when holes in this crust rotate toward the Sun, exposing the interior ice to the warming sunlight.

This assumption was shown to be naive, starting at Halley. Coma composition does not represent nucleus composition, as activity selects for volatiles, and against refractories, including heavy organic fractions.^[62][63] Our understanding has evolved more toward mostly rock;^[64] recent estimates show that water is perhaps only 20-30% of the mass in typical nuclei.^[65][66][61] Instead, comets are predominantly organic materials and minerals.^[67] Data from Churyumov-Gerasimenko and Arrokoth, and laboratory experiments on accretion, suggest refractories-to-ices ratios less than 1 may not be possible.^[68]

The composition of water vapor from Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, as determined by the Rosetta mission, is substantially different from that found on Earth. The ratio of deuterium to hydrogen in the water from the comet was determined to be three times that found for terrestrial water. This makes it unlikely that water on Earth came from comets such as Churyumov–Gerasimenko.^[69][70]

Organics

"Missing Carbon"^[71][72]

Structure

 

Surface of the nucleus of Comet 67P from 10 km away as seen by Rosetta spacecraft

On 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, some of the resulting water vapour may escape from the nucleus, but 80% of it recondenses in layers beneath the surface.^[73] This observation implies that the thin ice-rich layers exposed close to the surface may be a consequence of cometary activity and evolution, and that global layering does not necessarily occur early in the comet's formation history.^[73][74]

 

Fragment B of Comet 73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3 disintegrating, as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope

Measurements carried out by the Philae lander on 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko comet, indicate that the dust layer could be as much as 20 cm (7.9 in) thick. Beneath that is hard ice, or a mixture of ice and dust. Porosity appears to increase toward the center of the comet.^[75] While most scientists thought that all the evidence indicated that the structure of nuclei of comets is processed rubble piles of smaller ice planetesimals of a previous generation,^[76] the Rosetta mission dispelled the idea that comets are "rubble piles" of disparate material.^{[77][78][dubious ]} The Rosetta mission indicated that comets may be "rubble piles" of disparate material.^[79] Data were not conclusive concerning the collisional environment during the formation and right afterwards.^[80][81][82]

Splitting

The nucleus of some comets may be fragile, a conclusion supported by the observation of comets splitting apart.^[48] Splitting comets include 3D/Biela in 1846, Shoemaker–Levy 9 in 1992,^[83] and 73P/Schwassmann–Wachmann from 1995 to 2006.^[84] Greek historian Ephorus reported that a comet split apart as far back as the winter of 372–373 BC.^[85] Comets are suspected of splitting due to thermal stress, internal gas pressure, or impact.^[86]

Comets 42P/Neujmin and 53P/Van Biesbroeck appear to be fragments of a parent comet. Numerical integrations have shown that both comets had a rather close approach to Jupiter in January 1850, and that, before 1850, the two orbits were nearly identical.^[87]

Albedo

Cometary nuclei are among the darkest objects known to exist in the Solar System. The Giotto probe found that Comet Halley's nucleus reflects approximately 4% of the light that falls on it,^[88] and Deep Space 1 discovered that Comet Borrelly's surface reflects only 2.5–3.0% of the light that falls on it;^[88] by comparison, fresh asphalt reflects 7% of the light that falls on it. It is thought that complex organic compounds are the dark surface material. Solar heating drives off volatile compounds leaving behind heavy long-chain organics that tend to be very dark, like tar or crude oil. The very darkness of cometary surfaces allows them to absorb the heat necessary to drive their outgassing.

Roughly six percent of the near-Earth asteroids are thought to be extinct nuclei of comets (see Extinct comets) which no longer experience outgassing.^[89] Two near-Earth asteroids with albedos this low include 14827 Hypnos and 3552 Don Quixote.^{[dubious ]}

Discovery and exploration

The first relatively close mission to a comet nucleus was space probe Giotto.^[90] This was the first time a nucleus was imaged at such proximity, coming as near as 596 km.^[90] The data was a revelation, showing for the first time the jets, the low-albedo surface, and organic compounds.^[90][91]

During its flyby, Giotto was hit at least 12,000 times by particles, including a 1-gram fragment that caused a temporary loss of communication with Darmstadt.^[90] Halley was calculated to be ejecting three tonnes of material per second^[92] from seven jets, causing it to wobble over long time periods.^[2] Comet Grigg–Skjellerup's nucleus was visited after Halley, with Giotto approaching 100–200 km.^[90]

Results from the Rosetta and Philae spacecraft show that the nucleus of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko has no magnetic field, which suggests that magnetism may not have played a role in the early formation of planetesimals.^[3][4] Further, the ALICE spectrograph on Rosetta determined that electrons (within 1 km (0.62 mi) above the comet nucleus) produced from photoionization of water molecules by solar radiation, and not photons from the Sun as thought earlier, are responsible for the degradation of water and carbon dioxide molecules released from the comet nucleus into its coma.^[5][6]

Tempel 1 Deep Impact	Tempel 1 Stardust	Borrelly Deep Space 1	Wild 2 Stardust	Hartley 2 Deep Impact	C-G Rosetta

Comets already visited are:

• Halley's Comet
• 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup
• Tempel 1 (also hit with impactor)
• 19P/Borrelly
• 81P/Wild
• 103P/Hartley
• C/2013 A1 (Siding Spring) -unplanned encounter with Mars spacecraft
• 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (also landed on)

See also

• Coma (cometary)
• Hypatia (stone)
• List of comets visited by spacecraft

References

1. Robert Roy Britt (29 November 2001). . Space.com. Archived from the original on 22 January 2009. Retrieved 26 October 2008.
2. "ESA Science & Technology: Halley". ESA. 10 March 2006. Retrieved 22 February 2009.
3. Bauer, Markus (14 April 2015). "Rosetta and Philae Find Comet Not Magnetised". European Space Agency. Retrieved 14 April 2015.
4. Schiermeier, Quirin (14 April 2015). "Rosetta's comet has no magnetic field". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17327. S2CID 123964604.
5. Agle, DC; Brown, Dwayne; Fohn, Joe; Bauer, Markus (2 June 2015). "NASA Instrument on Rosetta Makes Comet Atmosphere Discovery". NASA. Retrieved 2 June 2015.
6. Feldman, Paul D.; A'Hearn, Michael F.; Bertaux, Jean-Loup; Feaga, Lori M.; Parker, Joel Wm.; et al. (2 June 2015). "Measurements of the near-nucleus coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko with the Alice far-ultraviolet spectrograph on Rosetta" (PDF). Astronomy and Astrophysics. 583: A8. arXiv:1506.01203. Bibcode:2015A&A...583A...8F. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525925. S2CID 119104807.
7. Jordans, Frank (30 July 2015). . The Washington Post. Associated Press. Archived from the original on 23 December 2018. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
8. "Science on the Surface of a Comet". European Space Agency. 30 July 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
9. Bibring, J.-P.; Taylor, M.G.G.T.; Alexander, C.; Auster, U.; Biele, J.; Finzi, A. Ercoli; Goesmann, F.; Klingehoefer, G.; Kofman, W.; Mottola, S.; Seidenstiker, K.J.; Spohn, T.; Wright, I. (31 July 2015). "Philae's First Days on the Comet – Introduction to Special Issue". Science. 349 (6247): 493. Bibcode:2015Sci...349..493B. doi:10.1126/science.aac5116. PMID 26228139.
10. Rickman, H (2017). "1.1.1 The Comet Nucleus". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571.
11. Lyttleton, RA (1948). "On the Origin of Comets". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 108 (6): 465–75. Bibcode:1948MNRAS.108..465L. doi:10.1093/mnras/108.6.465.
12. Lyttleton, R (1951). "On the Structure of Comets and the Formation of Tails". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 111 (3): 268–77. Bibcode:1951MNRAS.111..268L. doi:10.1093/mnras/111.3.268.
13. Lyttleton, R (1972). The Comets and Their Origin. Cambridge University Press New York. ISBN 9781107615618.
14. Bailey, M; Clube, S; Napier, W (1990). "8.3 Lyttleton's Accretion Theory". The Origin of Comets. Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-034859-9.
15. Whipple, F (1950). "A Comet Model. I: the Acceleration of Comet Encke". Astrophysical Journal. 111: 375–94. Bibcode:1950ApJ...111..375W. doi:10.1086/145272.
16. Whipple, F (1951). "A Comet Model. II: Physical Relations for Comets and Meteors". Astrophysical Journal. 113: 464–74. Bibcode:1951ApJ...113..464W. doi:10.1086/145416.
17. Delsemme, A (1 July 1972). "Present Understanding of Comets". Comets: Scientific Data and Missions: 174. Bibcode:1972csdm.conf..174D.
18. Wood, J (December 1986). Comet nucleus models: a review. ESA Workshop on the Comet Nucleus Sample Return Mission. pp. 123–31.
19. Kresak, L; Kresakova, M (1987). ESA SP-278: Symposium on the Diversity and Similarity of Comets. ESA. p. 739.
20. Rickman, H (2017). "2.2.3 Dust Production Rates". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571. "It has been a long time since comet nuclei could be imagined as frozen snowballs"
21. Hartmann, W; Cruikshank, D; Degewij, J (1982). "Remote comets and related bodies: VJHK colorimetry and surface materials". Icarus. 52 (3): 377–08. Bibcode:1982Icar...52..377H. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(82)90002-1.
22. Fanale, F; Salvail, J (1984). "An idealized short-period comet model". Icarus. 60: 476. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90157-X.
23. Cruikshank, D; Hartmann, W; Tholen, D (1985). "Color, albedo, and nucleus size of Halley's comet". Nature. 315 (6015): 122. Bibcode:1985Natur.315..122C. doi:10.1038/315122a0. S2CID 4357619.
24. Greenberg, J (May 1986). "Predicting that comet Halley is dark". Nature. 321 (6068): 385. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..385G. doi:10.1038/321385a0. S2CID 46708189.
25. Rickman, H (2017). "4.2 Dust Mantling". Origin and Evolution of Comets: 10 years after the Nice Model, and 1 year after Rosetta. World Scientific Publishing Co Singapore. ISBN 978-9813222571. "the term dust mantling has been in common use since more than 35 years"
26. Tholen, D; Cruikshank, D; Hammel, H; Hartmann, W; Lark, N; Piscitelli, J (1986). "A comparison of the continuum colours of P/Halley, other comets and asteroids". ESA SP-250 Vol. III. ESA. p. 503.
27. Whipple, F (October 1987). "The Cometary Nucleus - Current Concepts". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 187 (1): 852.
28. A'Hearn, M (2008). "Deep Impact and the Origin and Evolution of Cometary Nuclei". Space Science Reviews. 138 (1): 237. Bibcode:2008SSRv..138..237A. doi:10.1007/s11214-008-9350-3. S2CID 123621097.
29. Trigo-Rodriguez, J; Blum, J (February 2009). "Tensile strength as an indicator of the degree of primitiveness of undifferentiated bodies". Planet. Space Sci. 57 (2): 243–49. Bibcode:2009P&SS...57..243T. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2008.02.011.
30. Weissman, P; Asphaug, E; Lowry, S (2004). "Structure and Density of Cometary Nuclei". Comets II. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. p. 337.
31. Bischoff, D; Gundlach, B; Neuhaus, M; Blum, J (February 2019). "Experiment on cometary activity: ejection of dust aggregates from a sublimating water-ice surface". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483 (1): 1202. arXiv:1811.09397. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.483.1202B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3182. S2CID 119278016.
32. Rotundi, A; Sierks H; Della Corte V; Fulle M; GutierrezP; et al. (23 January 2015). "Dust Measurements in the coma of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko inbound to the Sun". Science. 347 (6220): aaa3905. Bibcode:2015Sci...347a3905R. doi:10.1126/science.aaa3905. PMID 25613898. S2CID 206634190.
33. Fulle, M; Della Corte, V; Rotundi, A; Green, S; Accolla, M; Colangeli, L; Ferrari, M; Ivanovski, S; Sordini, R; Zakharov, V (2017). "The dust-to-ices ratio in comets and Kuiper belt objects". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469: S45-49. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.469S..45F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx983.
34. Fulle, M; Marzari, F; Della Corte, V; Fornasier, S (April 2016). "Evolution of the dust size distribution of comet 67P/C-G from 2.2au to perihelion" (PDF). Astrophysical Journal. 821: 19. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/19. hdl:11577/3199084. S2CID 125072014.
35. Fulle, M; Altobelli, N; Buratti, B; Choukroun, M; Fulchignoni, M; Grün, E; Taylor, M; et al. (November 2016). "Unexpected and significant findings in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: an interdisciplinary view". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 462: S2-8. Bibcode:2016MNRAS.462S...2F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1663.
36. Fulle, M; Blum, J; Green, S; Gundlach, B; Herique, A; Moreno, F; Mottola, S; Rotundi, A; Snodgrass, C (January 2019). "The refractory-to-ice mass ratio in comets" (PDF). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 482 (3): 3326–40. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.482.3326F. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2926.
37. Choukroun, M; Altwegg, K; Kührt, E; Biver, N; Bockelée-Morvan, D; et al. (2020). "Dust-to-Gas and Refractory-to-ice Mass Ratios of Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko from Rosetta Obs". Space Sci Rev. 216: 44. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00662-1. S2CID 216338717.
38. "How comets were assembled". University of Bern. 29 May 2015. Retrieved 8 January 2016 – via Phys.org.
39. Jutzi, M.; Asphaug, E. (June 2015). "The shape and structure of cometary nuclei as a result of low-velocity accretion". Science. 348 (6241): 1355–1358. Bibcode:2015Sci...348.1355J. doi:10.1126/science.aaa4747. PMID 26022415. S2CID 36638785.
40. Weidenschilling, S. J. (June 1997). "The Origin of Comets in the Solar Nebula: A Unified Model". Icarus. 127 (2): 290–306. Bibcode:1997Icar..127..290W. doi:10.1006/icar.1997.5712.
41. Choi, Charles Q. (15 November 2014). "Comets: Facts About The 'Dirty Snowballs' of Space". Space.com. Retrieved 8 January 2016.
42. Nuth, Joseph A.; Hill, Hugh G. M.; Kletetschka, Gunther (20 July 2000). "Determining the ages of comets from the fraction of crystalline dust". Nature. 406 (6793): 275–276. Bibcode:2000Natur.406..275N. doi:10.1038/35018516. PMID 10917522. S2CID 4430764.
43. "How Asteroids and Comets Formed". Science Clarified. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
44. Levison, Harold F.; Donnes, Luke (2007). "Comet Populations and Cometary Dynamics". In McFadden, Lucy-Ann Adams; Weissman, Paul Robert; Johnson, Torrence V. (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Solar System (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press. pp. 575–588. ISBN 978-0-12-088589-3.
45. Dones, L; Brasser, R; Kaib, N; Rickman, H (2015). "Origi and Evolu of the Cometar Reserv". Space Science Reviews. 197: 191–69. doi:10.1007/s11214-015-0223-2. S2CID 123931232.
46. Meech, K (2017). "Setting the scene: what did we know before Rosetta?". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 375 (2097). Section 6. Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560247M. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0247. PMC 5454221. PMID 28554969. Special issue: Cometary science after Rosetta
47. Hsieh, H; Novaković, B; Walsh, K; Schörghofer, N (2020). "Potential Themis-family Asteroid Contribution to the Jupiter-family Comet Population". The Astronomical Journal. 159 (4): 179. arXiv:2002.09008. Bibcode:2020AJ....159..179H. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab7899. PMC 7121251. PMID 32255816. S2CID 211252398.
48. Yeomans, Donald K. (2005). . NASA. Archived from the original on 29 April 2005. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
49. "What Have We Learned About Halley's Comet?". Astronomical Society of the Pacific (No. 6 – Fall 1986). 1986. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
50. Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S.A.; Parker, J. Wm. (2003). "Hubble Space Telescope STIS Observations of Comet 19P/BORRELLY during the Deep Space 1 Encounter". The Astronomical Journal. 126 (1): 444–451. Bibcode:2003AJ....126..444W. doi:10.1086/375752. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
51. Fernández, Yanga R. (2002). "The Nucleus of Comet Hale-Bopp (C/1995 O1): Size and Activity". Earth, Moon, and Planets. 89 (1): 3–25. Bibcode:2002EM&P...89....3F. doi:10.1023/A:1021545031431. S2CID 189899565.
52. "SOHO's new catch: its first officially periodic comet". European Space Agency. 25 September 2007. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
53. D. T. Britt; G. J. Consol-magno SJ; W. J. Merline (2006). (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science XXXVII. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 December 2008. Retrieved 14 December 2008.
54. Halley: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 15x8x8km * a rubble pile density of 0.6 g/cm³ yields a mass (m=d*v) of 3.02E+14 kg.
    Tempel 1: Using a spherical diameter of 6.25 km; volume of a sphere * a density of 0.62 g/cm³ yields a mass of 7.9E+13 kg.
    19P/Borrelly: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 8x4x4km * a density of 0.3 g/cm³ yields a mass of 2.0E+13 kg.
    81P/Wild: Using the volume of an ellipsoid of 5.5x4.0x3.3 km * a density of 0.6 g/cm³ yields a mass of 2.28E+13 kg.
55. RZ Sagdeev; PE Elyasberg; VI Moroz. (1988). "Is the nucleus of Comet Halley a low density body?". Nature. 331 (6153): 240–242. Bibcode:1988Natur.331..240S. doi:10.1038/331240a0. S2CID 4335780.
56. . The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on 9 February 2006. Retrieved 15 December 2008.
57. . The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on 6 January 2009. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
58. Baldwin, Emily (6 October 2014). "Measuring Comet 67P/C-G". European Space Agency. Retrieved 16 November 2014.
59. Baldwin, Emily (21 August 2014). "Determining the mass of comet 67P/C-G". European Space Agency. Retrieved 21 August 2014.
60. Wood, J A (December 1986). "Comet nucleus models: a review.". ESA Proceedings of an ESA workshop on the Comet Nucleus Sample Return Mission. ESA. pp. 123–31. water-ice as the predominant constituent
61. Bischoff, D; Gundlach, B; Neuhaus, M; Blum, J (February 2019). "Experiments on cometary activity: ejection of dust aggregates from a sublimating water-ice surface". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483 (1): 1202–10. arXiv:1811.09397. Bibcode:2019MNRAS.483.1202B. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3182. In the past, it was believed that comets are dirty snowballs and that the dust is ejected when the ice retreats." "...it has become evident that comets have a much higher dust-to-ice ratio than previously thought
62. Bockelée-Morvan, D; Biver, N (May 2017). "The composition of cometary ices". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 375 (2097). Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560252B. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0252. PMID 28554972. S2CID 2207751. Molecular abundances are measured in cometary atmospheres. The extent to which they are representative of the nucleus composition has been the subject of many theoretical studies.
63. O'D. Alexander, C; McKeegan, K; Altwegg, K (February 2019). "Water Reservoirs in Small Planetary Bodies: Meteorites, Asteroids, and Comets". Space Science Reviews. 214 (1): 36. doi:10.1007/s11214-018-0474-9. PMC 6398961. PMID 30842688. While the coma is clearly heterogeneous in composition, no firm statement can be made about the compositional heterogeneity of the nucleus at any given time." "what can be measured in their comas remotely may not be representative of their bulk compositions.
64. A'Hearn, M (May 2017). "Comets: looking ahead". Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A. 375 (2097). Bibcode:2017RSPTA.37560261A. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0261. PMC 5454229. PMID 28554980. our understanding has been evolving more toward mostly rock
65. Jewitt, D; Chizmadia, L; Grimm, R; Prialnik, D (2007). "Water in the Small Bodies of the Solar System". Protostars and Planets V. University of Arizona Press. pp. 863–78. Recent estimates... show that water is less important, perhaps carrying only 20-30% of the mass in typical nuclei (Sykes et al., 1986).
66. Fulle, M; Della Corte, V; Rotundi, A; Green, S; Accolla, M; Colangeli, L; Ferrari, M; Ivanovski, S; Sordini, R; Zakharov, V (2017). "The dust-to-ices ratio in comets and Kuiper belt objects". Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469: S45-49. Bibcode:2017MNRAS.469S..45F. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx983.
67. Filacchione, G; Groussin, O; Herny, C; Kappel, D; Mottola, S; Oklay, N; Pommerol, A; Wright, I; Yoldi, Z; Ciarniello, M; Moroz, L; Raponi, A (2019). "Comet 67P/CG Nucleus Composition and Comparison to Other Comets" (PDF). Space Science Reviews. 215 (1): Article number 19. Bibcode:2019SSRv..215...19F. doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0580-3. S2CID 127214832. a predominance of organic materials and minerals.
68. Lorek, S.; Gundlach, B.; Lacerda, P.; Blum, J. (2018). "Comet formation in collapsing pebble clouds What cometary bulk density implies for the cloud mass and dust-to-ice ratio". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 587: A128. arXiv:1601.05726. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526565. S2CID 119208933.
69. Borenstein, Seth (10 December 2014). "The mystery of where Earth's water came from deepens". Excite News. Associated Press. Retrieved 14 December 2014.
70. Agle, D. C.; Bauer, Markus (10 December 2014). "Rosetta Instrument Reignites Debate on Earth's Oceans". NASA. Retrieved 10 December 2014.
71. Kissel, J.; Sagdeev, R. Z.; Bertaux, J. L.; Angarov, V. N.; Audouze, J.; Blamont, J. E.; Buchler, K.; Evlanov, E. N.; Fechtig, H.; Fomenkova, M. N.; Hoerner, von H.; Inogamov, N. A.; Khromov, V. N.; Knabe, W.; Krueger, F. R.; Langevin, Y.; Leonasv, B. (1986). "Composition of comet Halley dust particles from Vega observations". Nature. 321: 280. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..280K. doi:10.1038/321280a0. S2CID 122405233.
72. Kissel, J.; Brownlee, D. E.; Buchler, K.; Clark, B.; Fechtig, H.; Grun, E.; Hornung, K.; Igenbergs, E. (1986). "Composition of comet Halley dust particles from Giotto observations". Nature. 321: 336. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..336K. doi:10.1038/321336a0. S2CID 186245081.
73. Filacchione, Gianrico; Capaccioni, Fabrizio; Taylor, Matt; Bauer, Markus (13 January 2016). (Press release). European Space Agency. Archived from the original on 18 January 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
74. Filacchione, G.; de Sanctis, M. C.; Capaccioni, F.; Raponi, A.; Tosi, F.; et al. (13 January 2016). "Exposed water ice on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko". Nature. 529 (7586): 368–372. Bibcode:2016Natur.529..368F. doi:10.1038/nature16190. PMID 26760209. S2CID 4446724.
75. Baldwin, Emily (18 November 2014). "Philae settles in dust-covered ice". European Space Agency. Retrieved 18 December 2014.
76. Krishna Swamy, K. S. (May 1997). Physics of Comets. World Scientific Series in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 2 (2nd ed.). World Scientific. p. 364. ISBN 981-02-2632-2.
77. Khan, Amina (31 July 2015). "After a bounce, Rosetta". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
78. "Rosetta's frequently asked questions". European Space Agency. 2015. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
79. Rickman, H; Marchi, S; AHearn, M; Barbieri, C; El-Maarry, M; Güttler, C; Ip, W (2015). "Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko: Constraints on its origin from OSIRIS observations". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 583: Article 44. arXiv:1505.07021. Bibcode:2015A&A...583A..44R. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526093. S2CID 118394879.
80. Jutzi, M; Benz, W; Toliou, A; Morbidelli, A; Brasser, R (2017). "How primordial is the structure of comet 67P? Combined collisional and dynamical models suggest a late formation". Astronomy & Astrophysics. 597: A# 61. arXiv:1611.02604. Bibcode:2017A&A...597A..61J. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628963. S2CID 119347364.
81. Michel, P.; Schwartz, S.; Jutzi, M.; Marchi, S.; Zhang, Y.; Richardson, D. C. (2018). Catastrophic Disruptions As The Origin Of 67PC-G And Small Bilobate Comets. 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly. p. B1.1–0002–18.
82. Keller, H; Kührt, E (2020). "Cometary Nuclei- From Giotto to Rosetta". Space Science Reviews. 216 (1): Article 14. Bibcode:2020SSRv..216...14K. doi:10.1007/s11214-020-0634-6. S2CID 213437916. Sec. 6.3 Major Open Points Remain "data are not conclusive concerning the collisional environment during the formation and right afterwards"
83. JPL Public Information Office. "Comet Shoemaker-Levy Background". JPL/NASA. Retrieved 25 October 2008.
84. Whitney Clavin (10 May 2006). "Spitzer Telescope Sees Trail of Comet Crumbs". Spitzer Space Telescope at Caltech. Retrieved 25 October 2008.
85. Donald K. Yeomans (1998). "Great Comets in History". Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 15 March 2007.
86. H. Boehnhardt. "Split Comets" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Institute (Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie Heidelberg). Retrieved 25 October 2008.
87. J. Pittichova; K.J. Meech; G.B. Valsecch; E.M. Pittich (1–6 September 2003). . Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, 35 #4. Archived from the original on 13 August 2009.
88. "Comet May Be the Darkest Object Yet Seen". The New York Times. 14 December 2001. Retrieved 9 May 2011.
89. Whitman, Kathryn; Morbidelli, Alessandro; Jedicke, Robert (2006). "The Size-Frequency Distribution of Dormant Jupiter Family Comets". Icarus. 183 (1): 101–114. arXiv:astro-ph/0603106. Bibcode:2006Icar..183..101W. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.02.016. S2CID 14026673.
90. esa. "Giotto overview". European Space Agency.
91. Organic compounds (usually referred to as organics) does not imply life, it is just a class of chemicals: see Organic chemistry.
92. J. A. M. McDonnell; et al. (15 May 1986). "Dust density and mass distribution near comet Halley from Giotto observations". Nature. 321: 338–341. Bibcode:1986Natur.321..338M. doi:10.1038/321338a0. S2CID 122092751.

External links

• Nucleus of Halley's Comet (15×8×8 km)
• Nucleus of Comet Wild 2 (5.5×4.0×3.3 km)
• 67/P by Rosetta2 (ESA)