fbpx
Wikipedia

Benty Grange hanging bowl

The Benty Grange hanging bowl is a fragmentary Anglo-Saxon artifact from the seventh century AD. All that remains are parts of two escutcheons: bronze frames that are usually circular and elaborately decorated, and that sit along the outside of the rim or at the interior base of a hanging bowl. A third one disintegrated soon after excavation, and it no longer survives. The escutcheons were found in 1848 by the antiquary Thomas Bateman, while excavating a tumulus at the Benty Grange farm in western Derbyshire. They were presumably buried as part of an entire hanging bowl. The grave had probably been looted by the time of Bateman's excavation, but still contained high-status objects suggestive of a richly furnished burial, including the hanging bowl and the boar-crested Benty Grange helmet.

Benty Grange hanging bowl
Reconstructed escutcheon design[note 1]
MaterialBronze, enamel
Discovered1848
Benty Grange farm, Monyash, Derbyshire, England
53°10′29.7″N 1°46′58.8″W / 53.174917°N 1.783000°W / 53.174917; -1.783000
Discovered byThomas Bateman
Present location
RegistrationJ93.1190; AN1893.276

The surviving escutcheons are made of enameled bronze and are 40 mm (1.6 in) in diameter. They show three dolphin-like creatures arranged in a circle, each biting the tail of the one ahead of it. Their bodies and the background are made of enamel, likely all yellow; the creatures' outlines and eyes are tinned or silvered, as are the borders of the escutcheons. Although three escutcheons from a hanging bowl at Faversham also contain dolphin-like creatures, the Benty Grange design is most closely paralleled by Insular manuscripts, particularly figures in the Durham Gospel Fragment and the Book of Durrow. Surviving illustrations of the third escutcheon show that it was of a different size and style, exhibiting a scroll-like pattern. It parallels the basal disc of a hanging bowl from Winchester and may have been originally placed at the bottom of the Benty Grange bowl.

What remains of one escutcheon belongs to Museums Sheffield and as of 2023 was in the collection of the Weston Park Museum. The other is held by the Ashmolean Museum at the University of Oxford; as of 2023, it was not on display.

Hanging bowls edit

 
A 7th-century hanging bowl, with two hook escutcheons visible, found at Baginton

Hanging bowls are thin-walled bronze vessels with three or four equidistant hooks around the rim for suspension. They are a fixture of Late Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, and Viking archaeology and art, spanning approximately 400 AD to 1100 AD.[1] The hooks project from escutcheons: bronze plates or frames that are usually circular or oval, that are frequently elaborately decorated, and that are riveted or soldered (or occasionally both) to the bowl.[2] Basal escutcheons, also known as basal discs, would sometimes sit at the base of the interior.[3] A 2005 catalogue of hanging bowls identified approximately 174 known examples, around 68 of which were relatively complete.[4] Within the British Isles, England accounted for 117, Scotland for 7, and Ireland for 17; elsewhere, Norway accounted for 26, and the remainder of Europe for 7.[4]

The purpose of hanging bowls, and their places of manufacture, is unknown.[2] They appear to have been manufactured by Celtic makers in Britain in the post-Roman period; examples were also used by Anglo-Saxons (who likely received bowls via trade) and, later, by Vikings.[5][6] One possibility is that they were originally made by populations outside the sphere of Anglo-Saxon control, such as in the Severn Valley in southwest England and the Moray Firth in Scotland, and—as the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms extended their territories—were manufactured in progressively northern places, such as Dál Riata, Strathclyde, and Pictland, with the tradition ultimately taking root in Ireland also.[6][7]

Many suggestions have been made regarding the original use of hanging bowls, including their use as lamps or lamp reflectors,[8] votive vessels hung in churches,[9] vessels for liturgical use such as washing hands or communion vessels,[10][11] sanctuary lamps, wayside drinking vessels of the sort Edwin of Northumbria is said to have provided for travelers,[12] finger bowls,[13] scale pans for weighing wool,[14] magnetic compasses, food containers, holy water stoups, wash basins, and ceremonial vessels used in mead halls.[15][16] When they were acquired by Anglo-Saxons and Vikings, the bowls likely took on even more uses.[15] Whatever their original functional purpose, by the seventh century, hanging bowls appear to have been increasingly associated with wealth and the status of their owners;[17] during the seventh and early eighth centuries hanging bowls were a common feature in richly furnished Anglo-Saxon graves.[18] By this point, the role of hanging bowls as a status symbol may have been more important than any functional purpose.[17]

Description edit

 
The INI monogram in the Durham Gospel Fragment contains similar fish-like creatures.

Two escutcheons are all that remain of the Benty Grange hanging bowl.[19] They are made of enamelled bronze and are 40 mm (1.6 in) in diameter.[19] They have the same design and plain frames, parts of which survive.[19] Both escutcheons are fragmentary; enough survives of each for the design to be reconstructed,[19] and, because of overlapping segments, for it to be certain that they represent two distinct pieces.[20] Whether they are hook or basal escutcheons is uncertain, but a contemporary watercolour by Llewellynn Jewitt suggests that a hook was present at excavation, and an iron ring, 2 millimetres in width and 16 in diameter, stuck to the back of one fragment may have been part of a suspension chain.[19] The decomposed enamel background appears uniformly yellow to the eye,[21] as it did when excavated.[22][23][24] A yellow-creatures-on-red-background colour scheme has alternatively been claimed,[25][26][27] but no evidence for such a layout has been presented.[21] As sampling of the enamel was not permitted when one of the escutcheons was analysed in 1968, the all-yellow hypothesis is not definitive.[28][note 2]

The reconstructed design shows three ribbon-style creatures resembling dolphins or fish, depicted in and arranged in a circle with each biting the tail of the one in front.[19] The bodies are defined by their outlines.[20] They are limbless, the tails curled in a circle, the jaws long and curved, and slightly ajar; the bitten tails pass under each creature's upper jaw and over its lower, but are missing where one would expect to see them passing through the gap between jaws.[19] Each creature has a small eye shaped like a pointed oval.[19] The outer borders of the discs, the plain frames, and the contours and eyes of the creatures are all tinned or silvered.[19]

Surviving records of the third escutcheon indicate that it was of a different style and size.[19][20] Drawings by Bateman and Jewitt show it with a scroll pattern and small piece of frame.[20][22][32] It appears to have been about half the size of the other two, and may have originally been placed at the bottom of the hanging bowl.[19]

The escutcheons were presumably part of an entire hanging bowl when buried.[19] Nothing else survives.[19] A mass of corroded chainwork discovered 6 feet (1.8 m) away, which survives only in illustrations by Jewitt and descriptions by Bateman,[33][34] is unlikely to be related; although a large and intricate chain was found with a cauldron from Sutton Hoo, the Benty Grange chains appear dissimilar.[35] The Benty Grange chainwork was also probably too heavy to have been used to suspend the hanging bowl.[35]

Parallels edit

 
Similar dolphin-like creatures from the Book of Durrow

The dolphin-like designs on the Benty Grange hanging bowl are paralleled by designs on other escutcheons, and even more closely by designs on medieval illuminated manuscripts.[25][36] Three escutcheons from a hanging bowl found in Faversham show creatures that also look like dolphins,[37][38][39] but with more detailed bodies;[36] a better parallel is with a disc found near the Lullingstone hanging bowl which dates to the late seventh century and is also decorated with dolphin-like creatures.[40][41] Two other sixth- or seventh-century discs, found in Chilton and Coltishall, also depict intertwined serpent-like creatures attempting to eat their own tails.[42][43] The third escutcheon from Benty Grange, meanwhile, surviving only in illustration, is most closely paralleled by the basal disc of the Winchester hanging bowl.[44][45]

Even closer parallels to the Benty Grange designs are found in manuscript illustrations.[36] Bateman remarked on this as early as 1861, noting that similar patterns were used in "several manuscripts of the [seventh] Century, for the purpose of decorating the initial letters".[24][46] Metalwork designs like those on the Benty Grange escutcheons may have inspired aspects of the manuscript art.[47][48] In particular, the mid-seventh-century Durham Gospel Fragment contains two similar fish-like motifs contained within the lateral stroke of the INI monogram that introduces the Gospel of Mark.[20][49] The Book of Durrow also contains an illustration of similarly linked yellow dolphin-like creatures.[47][48]

Date edit

The Benty Grange hanging bowl is dated by most experts to the second half of the seventh century, based on its design and the associated finds from the barrow in which it was found.[44] Given the presence of a helmet and cup with silver crosses, wrote Audrey Ozanne, "[t]he straightforward interpretation of this find would seem to be that it dates from a period subsequent to the official introduction of Christianity into Mercia in 655".[50][51][52] The surviving escutcheons also suggest a date in the mid-seventh century, given their resemblance to the illustrations in the Durham Gospel Fragment and the Book of Durrow;[53][54] the Winchester hanging bowl's basal disc, which the third Benty Grange escutcheon resembles, has traditionally been given the same date.[26][55]

Discovery edit

Location edit

 
Benty Grange Farm, in the parish of Monyash in the Derbyshire Dales district

The hanging bowl was discovered in a barrow on the Benty Grange farm in Derbyshire,[56] in what is now the Peak District National Park.[57] Thomas Bateman, an archaeologist and antiquarian who led the excavation,[note 3] described Benty Grange as "a high and bleak situation";[56] its barrow, which still survives, is prominently located by a major Roman road,[60] now roughly parallel to the A515 in the area,[61] possibly to display the burial to passing travellers.[62][63] The barrow is one of several tumuli in the vicinity and may have also been designed to share the skyline with two other nearby monuments, Arbor Low stone circle and Gib Hill barrow.[62][64]

The seventh-century Peak District was a small buffer province between Mercia and Northumbria, occupied, according to the Tribal Hidage, by the Anglo-Saxon Pecsæte.[65][66][note 4] The area came under the control of the Mercian kingdom around the eighth century;[66] the Benty Grange and other rich barrows suggest that the Pecsæte may have had their own dynasty beforehand, but there is no written evidence for this.[65]

Excavation edit

Bateman excavated the barrow on 3 May 1848.[56] Although he did not mention it in his account, he was probably not the first person to dig up the grave.[71] The fact that the objects were found in two clusters 6 feet (1.8 m) apart, and that other objects that normally accompany a helmet, such as a sword and shield, were absent,[72] suggests that the grave had previously been looted.[71] Given the size of the mound, an alternative (or additional) explanation is that it originally contained two burials, only one of which Bateman discovered.[73][note 5]

The barrow comprises a circular central mound approximately 15 m (50 ft) in diameter and 0.6 m (2 ft) high, an encircling fosse about 1 m (3.3 ft) wide and 0.3 m (1 ft) deep, and outer penannular earthworks around 3 m (10 ft) wide and 0.2 m (0.66 ft) high.[73] The entire structure measures approximately 23 by 22 m (75 by 72 ft).[73] Bateman suggested a body once lay at its centre, flat against the original surface of the soil;[56][75] what he described as the one remnant, strands of hair, is now thought to be from a cloak of fur, cowhide or something similar.[76] The recovered objects were found in two clusters.[71][77][78] One cluster was found in the area of the supposed hair, the other about 6 ft (1.8 m) to the west.[77][78] In the latter area Bateman described "a large mass of oxydized iron" which, when removed and washed, presented itself as a jumbled collection of chainwork, a six-pronged piece of iron resembling a hayfork, and the boar crested Benty Grange helmet.[79][80][81]

In the area of the supposed hair, Bateman described "a curious assemblage of ornaments", which were difficult to remove successfully from the hardened earth.[56][77] This included a cup identified as leather but probably of wood,[82][83] approximately 3 in (7.6 cm) in diameter at the mouth.[56][22] Its rim was edged with silver,[56] and its surface was "decorated by four wheel-shaped ornaments and two crosses of thin silver, affixed by pins of the same metal, clenched inside".[24] Also found were "a knot of very fine wire", some "thin bone variously ornamented with lozenges &c." attached to silk, but that soon decayed when exposed to air, and the Benty Grange hanging bowl.[22][32][46] As Bateman described it

The other articles found in the same situation are principally personal ornaments, of the same scroll pattern as those figured at page 25 of the Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire;[84]—of these enamels, there were two upon copper, with silver frames; and another of some composition which fell to dust almost immediately: the prevailing colour in all is yellow.[22]

 
A contemporary watercolour by Llewellynn Jewitt depicts the surviving escutcheons, top, fragments of the third escutcheon, second-to-bottom row, and associated finds.

Bateman closed his 1848 account of the excavation by noting the "particularly corrosive nature of the soil",[85] which by 1861 he said "has generally been the case in tumuli in Derbyshire".[86] He suggested that this was the result of "a mixing or tempering with some corrosive liquid; the result of which is the presence of thin ochrey veins in the earth, and the decomposition of nearly the whole of the human remains."[86] Bateman's friend Llewellynn Jewitt, an artist and antiquarian who frequently accompanied Bateman on excavations,[87] painted four watercolours of the finds, parts of which were included in Bateman's 1848 account.[88][note 6] This was more than Jewitt produced for any other of their excavations, a mark of the importance that they assigned to the Benty Grange barrow.[88]

The hanging bowl escutcheons entered Bateman's extensive collection. On 27 October 1848 he reported his discoveries, including the helmet, cup, and hanging bowl, at a meeting of the British Archaeological Association,[90][91][92] and in 1855 they were catalogued along with other objects from the Benty Grange barrow.[93] In 1861 Bateman died at age 39,[59] and in 1876 his son, Thomas W. Bateman, loaned the collection to the town council (the Corporation of Sheffield).[94] It was displayed at the Weston Park Museum through 1893, at which point the younger Bateman, having spent his father's fortune, was forced to sell by order of chancery.[95][96] The Corporation of Sheffield purchased many of the objects that had been excavated in Yorkshire, Derbyshire, and Staffordshire, including the helmet, the cup fittings, and one of the hanging bowl escutcheons; other pieces were dispersed by Sotheby's,[96][97] and later in 1893 the second escutcheon was presented to the Ashmolean Museum at the University of Oxford by Sir John Evans.[98] As of 2021 and 2023, respectively, the escutcheons remain in the collections of the two museums.[99][98]

The Benty Grange barrow was designated a scheduled monument on 23 October 1970.[73] The list entry notes that "[a]lthough the centre of Benty Grange [barrow] has been partially disturbed by excavation, the monument is otherwise undisturbed and retains significant archaeological remains."[73] It goes on to note that further excavation would yield new information.[73] The surrounding fields were designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest in 2013, and are used for agricultural.[100] The nearby farmhouse was renovated between 2012 and 2014;[101][102] as of 2023 is used as a holiday cottage.[103]

Publication edit

Bateman published an article on the Benty Grange excavation in October 1848, five months after excavating the barrow, in The Journal of the British Archaeological Association.[104] The finds were included in his 1855 catalogue of his collection,[105] and shortly before his death, Bateman revised and expanded upon his 1848 account in his 1861 book Ten Years' Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills.[106] Llewellynn Jewitt commented upon the finds, including the hanging bowl, in his 1870 book Grave-Mounds and their Contents.[107]

The hanging bowl was one of the first to be discovered, and in 1898 John Romilly Allen included it among 16 examples in the first English article to discuss hanging bowls as a distinct class of artefact.[108][109] It was frequently mentioned in the literature thereafter,[36] including reconstructions by T. D. Kendrick in 1932 and 1938,[110][111] Françoise Henry in 1936,[112] Audrey Ozanne in 1962–1963,[113] George Speake in 1980,[114] and Jane Brenan in 1991.[115] Rupert Bruce-Mitford published a chapter on the Benty Grange burial in 1974, focusing on the helmet,[116] and published what he termed a definitive reconstruction of the escutcheons in 1987;[117] in his posthumous 2005 work A Corpus of Late Celtic Hanging-Bowls he added a full description of the hanging bowl, and a colour reconstruction of the escutcheons.[118]

Notes edit

  1. ^ After Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pl. 3.
  2. ^ Very few hanging bowl escutcheons have yellow rather than red enamel.[29][30] Many that appear yellow actually contain deteriorated red enamel; such enamel tends to be chalky or powdery instead of glassy, and visibly red enamel may remain underneath.[29][31] Françoise Henry stated in 1936 that the Benty Grange escutcheons were yellow-on-red,[25] as did Günther Haseloff [de] in 1990[27]—although he incorrectly attributed the two-colour theory to Rupert Bruce-Mitford.[21] Bruce-Mitford, who conducted the 1968 analysis on the escutcheon at the Weston Park Museum, wrote that "[n]o slightest trace of red can be detected in the depths or fractures of the background or the body-filling so far as these are visible".[28] Because sampling was not permitted, he termed the all-yellow colour scheme "a working hypothesis" while also noting that the bodies "are certainly yellow".[28] Otherwise, they would probably be yellow-on-red.[28]
  3. ^ Bateman excavated more than 500 barrows in his lifetime, earning him the moniker "The Barrow Knight".[58][59]
  4. ^ The Tribal Hidage is a list of territories south of the Humber, sized by hides, which were used as a measure of taxation.[67] Though the list has been variously dated between the mid-seventh and the late-eighth centuries, it may mix earlier and later calculations, and include information from as late as the tenth century;[68][69] it survives in several manuscripts, the latest of which dates to around the eleventh century.[70]
  5. ^ Llewellynn Jewitt suggested in 1870 that there had been two burials, writing that "In this mound, although a curious and unique helmet, the silver mountings of a leather drinking-cup, some highly interesting and beautiful enamelled ornaments, and other objects, as well as indications of the garments, remained, not a vestige of the body, with the exception of some of the hair, was to be seen. The lovely and delicate form of the female and the form of the stalwart warrior or noble had alike returned to their parent earth, leaving no trace behind, save the enamel of her teeth and traces of his hair alone, while the ornaments they wore and took pride in, and the surroundings of their stations, remained to tell their tale at this distant date."[74]
  6. ^ The four watercolours are now in the collection of the Weston Park Museum.[88][33][34][89]

References edit

  1. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 3, 34.
  2. ^ a b Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 3.
  3. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 11.
  4. ^ a b Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 3–5.
  5. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 29–30.
  6. ^ a b Webster 2012, pp. 101–102.
  7. ^ Youngs 2009, p. 228.
  8. ^ Henry 1936, pp. 211–213.
  9. ^ McRoberts 1963, pp. 304–305.
  10. ^ Liestøl 1953.
  11. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1987, p. 31.
  12. ^ Colgrave & Mynors 1969, p. 193.
  13. ^ Small, Thomas & Wilson 1973, pp. 110–111.
  14. ^ Mitchell 1923, p. 71 n.31.
  15. ^ a b Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 30.
  16. ^ Fowler 1968, pp. 287–288.
  17. ^ a b Brenan 1991, p. 135.
  18. ^ Geake 1999.
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 119.
  20. ^ a b c d e Bruce-Mitford 1974, p. 250 n.5.
  21. ^ a b c Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 77, 119.
  22. ^ a b c d e Bateman 1848b, p. 277.
  23. ^ Bateman 1855, p. 160.
  24. ^ a b c Bateman 1861, p. 29.
  25. ^ a b c Henry 1936, p. 236.
  26. ^ a b Ozanne 1962–1963, pp. 20–22.
  27. ^ a b Haseloff 1990, p. 162.
  28. ^ a b c d Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 77.
  29. ^ a b Brown 1981, pp. 230–231.
  30. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 76–77.
  31. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 76.
  32. ^ a b Bateman 1861, pp. 29–30.
  33. ^ a b Museums Sheffield chainwork 1.
  34. ^ a b Museums Sheffield chainwork 2.
  35. ^ a b Bruce-Mitford 1974, p. 250 n.6.
  36. ^ a b c d Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 120.
  37. ^ British Museum Faversham 1.
  38. ^ British Museum Faversham 2.
  39. ^ British Museum Faversham 3.
  40. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 72, 120, 175, 428.
  41. ^ Vierck 1970, p. 45.
  42. ^ Portable Antiquities Scheme Chilton 2017.
  43. ^ Portable Antiquities Scheme Coltishall 2017.
  44. ^ a b Ozanne 1962–1963, p. 22.
  45. ^ Winchester hanging bowl.
  46. ^ a b Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 224–225.
  47. ^ a b Kendrick 1938, pp. 100–101.
  48. ^ a b Haseloff 1958, pp. 87–88.
  49. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1987, p. 37.
  50. ^ Ozanne 1962–1963, p. 20.
  51. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, p. 242.
  52. ^ Longley 1975, p. 25.
  53. ^ Henry 1936, pp. 218, 236.
  54. ^ Brenan 1991, pp. 68, 72.
  55. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 132–136.
  56. ^ a b c d e f g Bateman 1861, p. 28.
  57. ^ Lester 1987, p. 34.
  58. ^ Goss 1889, p. 176.
  59. ^ a b Howarth 1899, p. v.
  60. ^ Ozanne 1962–1963, p. 35.
  61. ^ Derbyshire Historic Environment Record.
  62. ^ a b Brown 2017, p. 21.
  63. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, p. 224.
  64. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 223–224.
  65. ^ a b Yorke 1990, pp. 9–12, 102, 106, 108.
  66. ^ a b Keynes 2014, p. 312.
  67. ^ Kirby 1991, p. 9.
  68. ^ Kirby 1991, pp. 9–11.
  69. ^ Blair 2014.
  70. ^ Yorke 1990, pp. 9–10.
  71. ^ a b c Bruce-Mitford 1974, p. 229.
  72. ^ Smith 1908, p. 68.
  73. ^ a b c d e f Historic England Benty Grange.
  74. ^ Jewitt 1870, p. 211.
  75. ^ Bateman 1848b, p. 276.
  76. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 223, pl. 73.
  77. ^ a b c Bateman 1848b, pp. 276–277.
  78. ^ a b Bateman 1861, pp. 28–30.
  79. ^ Bateman 1848b, pp. 277–278.
  80. ^ Bateman 1861, pp. 30–32.
  81. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 225–227.
  82. ^ Allen 1898, pp. 46–47, 47 n.a.
  83. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 223, 223 n.4.
  84. ^ Bateman 1848a, p. 25.
  85. ^ Bateman 1848b, p. 279.
  86. ^ a b Bateman 1861, p. 32.
  87. ^ Goss 1889, pp. 170–171, 175–176, 249, 301.
  88. ^ a b c Museums Sheffield escutcheon watercolour.
  89. ^ Museums Sheffield helmet watercolour.
  90. ^ The Times 1848.
  91. ^ The Morning Post 1848.
  92. ^ The Ipswich Journal 1848.
  93. ^ Bateman 1855, pp. 159–160.
  94. ^ Howarth 1899, p. iii.
  95. ^ Rushforth 2004, pp. 114–115.
  96. ^ a b Howarth 1899, pp. iii–iv, 244.
  97. ^ Rushforth 2004, p. 115.
  98. ^ a b Ashmolean Museum.
  99. ^ Museums Sheffield escutcheon.
  100. ^ Natural England Benty Grange SSSI.
  101. ^ Peak District Applications 2012.
  102. ^ BentyGrange Twitter 2014.
  103. ^ Peak Venues Benty Grange.
  104. ^ Bateman 1848a.
  105. ^ Bateman 1855.
  106. ^ Bateman 1861.
  107. ^ Jewitt 1870, pp. 211, 248–257, 260–261.
  108. ^ Allen 1898, pp. 46–47.
  109. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, p. 8.
  110. ^ Kendrick 1932, p. 178.
  111. ^ Kendrick 1938, p. 100.
  112. ^ Henry 1936, p. 235.
  113. ^ Ozanne 1962–1963, p. 21.
  114. ^ Speake 1980, fig. 11c.
  115. ^ Brenan 1991, p. 188.
  116. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1974, pp. 223–252.
  117. ^ Bruce-Mitford 1987, pp. 35, 37.
  118. ^ Bruce-Mitford & Raven 2005, pp. 119–120, pl. 3b.

Bibliography edit

  • Allen, John Romilly (1898). "Metal Bowls of the Late-Celtic and Anglo-Saxon Periods". Archaeologia. LVI. London: Society of Antiquaries of London: 39–56. doi:10.1017/s0261340900003842.  
  • "Anglo-Saxon Antiquities". The Times. No. 20, 007. London. 30 October 1848. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.  
  • "Anglo-Saxon Antiquities". The Morning Post. No. 23, 370. London. 1 November 1848. p. 2 – via Newspapers.com.  
  • "Anglo-Saxon Antiquities". The Ipswich Journal. No. 5, 713. Ipswich. 4 November 1848. p. 4 – via Newspapers.com.  
  • "Anglo-Saxon bronze hanging bowl". Hampshire Cultural Trust. Retrieved 9 July 2021.  
  • Bateman, Thomas (1848a). Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire and the Sepulchral Usages of its Inhabitants, from the Most Remote Ages to the Reformation. London: John Russell Smith.  
  • Bateman, Thomas (October 1848b). "Description of the Contents of a Saxon Barrow". The Journal of the British Archaeological Association. IV (3). London: Henry George Bohn: 276–279. doi:10.1080/00681288.1848.11886866.  
  • Bateman, Thomas (1855). A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities and Miscellaneous Objects Preserved in the Museum of Thomas Bateman, at Lomberdale House, Derbyshire. Bakewell: James Gratton.  
  • Bateman, Thomas (1861). "Barrows: Benty Grange Near Monyash". Ten Years' Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills, in the Counties of Derby, Stafford, and York, from 1848 to 1858; with Notices of Some Former Discoveries, Hitherto Unpublished, and Remarks on the Crania and Pottery from the Mounds. London: John Russell Smith. pp. 28–33.  
  • Benty Grange [@BentyGrange] (22 August 2014). "We are proud to open the doors to Benty Grange to our first guests. We couldn't have done it without @PeakVenues . THANKS" (Tweet). Retrieved 10 February 2018 – via Twitter.  
  • "Benty Grange – Barn Conversion – Peak Venues". Peak Venues. Retrieved 5 November 2023.  
  • "Benty Grange SSSI". Designated Sites. Natural England. Retrieved 18 December 2023.
  • Blair, John (2014). "The Tribal Hidage". In Lapidge, Michael; Blair, John; Keynes, Simon & Scragg, Donald (eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 473–475. doi:10.1002/9781118316061.ch20. ISBN 978-0-470-65632-7.  
  • Brenan, Jane (1991). Hanging Bowls and their Contexts: An Archaeological Survey of Their Socio-Economic Significance from the Fifth to Seventh Centuries A.D. British Archaeological Reports. Vol. 220. Tempus Reparatum. ISBN 0-86054-724-8.
  • Brown, Antony (October 2017). (PDF). ARS Ltd Reports. 2017 (82). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 February 2018.  
  • Brown, David (1981). "Swastika Patterns". In Evison, Vera Ivy (ed.). Angles, Saxons, and Jutes: Essays Presented to J. N. L. Myres. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 227–240. ISBN 978-0-19-813402-2.
  • Bruce-Mitford, Rupert (1974). Aspects of Anglo-Saxon Archaeology: Sutton Hoo and Other Discoveries. London: Victor Gollancz Limited. ISBN 0-575-01704-X.
  • Bruce-Mitford, Rupert (1987). "Ireland and the Hanging Bowls – A Review". In Ryan, Michael (ed.). Ireland and Insular Art, A.D. 500–1200: Proceedings of a Conference at University College Cork, 31 October – 3 November 1985. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy. pp. 30–39. ISBN 0-901714-54-2.
  • Bruce-Mitford, Rupert & Raven, Sheila (2005). A Corpus of Late Celtic Hanging-Bowls with an Account of the Bowls Found in Scandinavia. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-813410-7.
  • Colgrave, Bertram & Mynors, R. A. B., eds. (1969). Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Oxford Medieval Tests. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  
  • "Escutcheon of hanging bowl". Ashmolean Museum. University of Oxford. Retrieved 5 November 2023.  
  • Fowler, Elizabeth (1968). "Hanging Bowls". In Coles, John Morton & Simpson, Derek Douglas Alexander (eds.). Studies in Ancient Europe: Essays Presented to Stuart Piggott. Leicester: Leicester University Press. pp. 287–310. ISBN 0-7185-1079-8.
  • "Fragments of enamelled escutcheon from Benty Grange". I Dig Sheffield. Museums Sheffield. Retrieved 31 July 2018.  
  • Goss, William Henry (1889). The Life and Death of Llewellynn Jewitt, F.S.A., Etc., with Fragmentary Memoirs of Some of his Famous Literary and Artistic Friends, Especially of Samuel Carter Hall, F.S.A., Etc. London: Henry Gray.  
  • "hanging bowl (.1248.'70)". The British Museum Collection Online. The British Museum. Retrieved 21 July 2021.  
  • "hanging bowl (.1248.a.'70)". The British Museum Collection Online. The British Museum. Retrieved 21 July 2021.  
  • "hanging bowl (.1248.b.'70)". The British Museum Collection Online. The British Museum. Retrieved 21 July 2021.  
  • Haseloff, Günther (1958). "Fragments of a Hanging-Bowl from Bekesbourne, Kent, and Some Ornamental Problems" (PDF). Medieval Archaeology. 2. Translated by de Paor, Liam: 72–103. doi:10.1080/00766097.1958.11735474.  
  • Haseloff, Günther (1990). Email im frühen Mittelalter: Frühchristliche Kunst von der Spätantike bis zu den Karolingern [Enamel in the Early Middle Ages: Early Christian Art from Late Antiquity to the Carolingians] (in German). Marburg: Hitzeroth. ISBN 3-89398-020-2.
  • Henry, Françoise (31 December 1936). "Hanging Bowls". The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland. 7th series. VI (II). Dublin: Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland: 209–246. JSTOR 25513828.  
  • Henry's original drawing available at "Sketch of Benty Grange escutcheon". UCD Digital Library. University College Dublin. Retrieved 2 April 2020.  
  • Historic England. "Benty Grange hlaew, Monyash (1013767)". National Heritage List for England. Retrieved 10 February 2018.  
  • Howarth, Elijah (1899). Catalogue of the Bateman Collection of Antiquities in the Sheffield Public Museum. London: Dulau and Co.  
  • Geake, Helen (1999). "When Were Hanging Bowls Deposited in Anglo-Saxon Graves?" (PDF). Medieval Archaeology. 43: 1–18. doi:10.1080/00766097.1999.11735623.  
  • Jewitt, Llewellynn (1870). Grave-Mounds and their Contents: A Manual of Archæology, as Exemplified in the Burials of the Celtic, the Romano-British, and the Anglo-Saxon Periods. London: Groombridge and Sons.  
  • Kendrick, T. D. (June 1932). "British Hanging Bowls". Antiquity. VI (22): 161–184. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00006700. S2CID 163210163.  
  • Kendrick, T. D. (1938). Anglo-Saxon Art to A.D. 900. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.  
  • Keynes, Simon (2014). "Mercia". In Lapidge, Michael; Blair, John; Keynes, Simon & Scragg, Donald (eds.). The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo-Saxon England (2nd ed.). Chichester: Blackwell Publishing. pp. 311–313. doi:10.1002/9781118316061.ch13. ISBN 978-0-470-65632-7.  
  • Kirby, David Peter (1991). "The Tribal Hidage". The Earliest English Kings. London: Unwin Hyman. pp. 9–12. ISBN 0-04-445691-3.
  • Lester, Geoff (Fall 1987). "The Anglo-Saxon Helmet from Benty Grange, Derbyshire" (PDF). Old English Newsletter. 21 (1): 34–35. ISSN 0030-1973.  
  • Liestøl, Aslak (1953). "The Hanging Bowl, a Liturgical and Domestic Vessel". Acta Archaeologica. XXIV: 163–170. ISSN 0065-101X.
  • Longley, David (1975). Hanging-Bowls, Penannular Brooches and the Anglo-Saxon Connexion. British Archaeological Reports. Vol. 22.
  • McRoberts, David (1963). "The Ecclesiastical Significance of the St Ninian's Isle Treasure". Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. XCIV. Edinburgh: Society of Antiquaries of Scotland: 301–314. doi:10.9750/PSAS.094.301.314.
  • Mitchell, Hugh Parker (February 1923). "Flotsam of Later Anglo-Saxon Art: I". The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs. LXII (CCXXXIX): 63–72. JSTOR 861685.
  • Ozanne, Audrey (1962–1963). "The Peak Dwellers" (PDF). Medieval Archaeology. 6–7: 15–52. doi:10.1080/00766097.1962.11735659.  
  • "Record ID: BERK-F72627 – Early Medieval Mount". Portable Antiquities Scheme. 13 March 2017. Retrieved 4 November 2023.  
  • "Record ID: ESS-806BCA – Early Medieval Mount". Portable Antiquities Scheme. 20 April 2017. Retrieved 4 November 2023.  
  • Rushforth, Rebecca (2004). "The Barrow Knight, the Bristol Bibliographer, and a Lost Old English Prayer". Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society. XIII (1): 112–131. JSTOR 41154940.  
  • "Site record MDR11318 – Roman Road ('The Street') (conjectural route of), Buxton to Derby, High Peak and Derbyshire Dales". Derbyshire Historic Environment Record. Derbyshire County Council. 27 September 2023. Retrieved 9 November 2023.  
  • Small, Alan; Thomas, Charles & Wilson, David M. (1973). St. Ninian's Isle and its Treasure: Text. Vol. I. London: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-714101-3.
  • Smith, Reginald Allender (1908). "Untitled [Notes on Brooches, Bronze Hanging-Bowls, and Enamelled Mounts]". Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London. 2nd series. XXII. London: Society of Antiquaries of London: 63–86. doi:10.1017/S0950797300002158.  
  • Speake, George (1980). Anglo-Saxon Animal Art. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-813194-1. LCCN 79-41091.
  • Vierck, Hayo (December 1970). "Cortina Tripodis: Zu Aufhängung und Gebrauch subrömischer Hängebecken aus Britannien und Irland". Frühmittelalterliche Studien (in German). 4: 8–52. doi:10.1515/9783110242041.8. S2CID 188786864.  
  • "Watercolour of finds from Benty Grange including escutcheon and cup fittings". I Dig Sheffield. Museums Sheffield. Retrieved 5 December 2018.  
  • "Watercolour Showing Fragments of Metal Chainwork". I Dig Sheffield. Museums Sheffield. Retrieved 3 August 2018.  
  • "Watercolour Showing Fragments of Metal Chainwork". I Dig Sheffield. Museums Sheffield. Retrieved 3 August 2018.  
  • "Watercolour showing the helmet from Benty Grange". I Dig Sheffield. Museums Sheffield. Retrieved 5 December 2018.  
  • Webster, Leslie (2012). Anglo-Saxon Art: A New History. London: The British Museum Press. ISBN 978-0-7141-2809-2.
  • (PDF). Peak District National Park Authority. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2017. Retrieved 10 February 2018.  
  • Yorke, Barbara (1990). Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-16639-X.

benty, grange, hanging, bowl, fragmentary, anglo, saxon, artifact, from, seventh, century, that, remains, parts, escutcheons, bronze, frames, that, usually, circular, elaborately, decorated, that, along, outside, interior, base, hanging, bowl, third, disintegr. The Benty Grange hanging bowl is a fragmentary Anglo Saxon artifact from the seventh century AD All that remains are parts of two escutcheons bronze frames that are usually circular and elaborately decorated and that sit along the outside of the rim or at the interior base of a hanging bowl A third one disintegrated soon after excavation and it no longer survives The escutcheons were found in 1848 by the antiquary Thomas Bateman while excavating a tumulus at the Benty Grange farm in western Derbyshire They were presumably buried as part of an entire hanging bowl The grave had probably been looted by the time of Bateman s excavation but still contained high status objects suggestive of a richly furnished burial including the hanging bowl and the boar crested Benty Grange helmet Benty Grange hanging bowlReconstructed escutcheon design note 1 MaterialBronze enamelDiscovered1848Benty Grange farm Monyash Derbyshire England53 10 29 7 N 1 46 58 8 W 53 174917 N 1 783000 W 53 174917 1 783000Discovered byThomas BatemanPresent locationWeston Park Museum SheffieldAshmolean Museum OxfordRegistrationJ93 1190 AN1893 276The surviving escutcheons are made of enameled bronze and are 40 mm 1 6 in in diameter They show three dolphin like creatures arranged in a circle each biting the tail of the one ahead of it Their bodies and the background are made of enamel likely all yellow the creatures outlines and eyes are tinned or silvered as are the borders of the escutcheons Although three escutcheons from a hanging bowl at Faversham also contain dolphin like creatures the Benty Grange design is most closely paralleled by Insular manuscripts particularly figures in the Durham Gospel Fragment and the Book of Durrow Surviving illustrations of the third escutcheon show that it was of a different size and style exhibiting a scroll like pattern It parallels the basal disc of a hanging bowl from Winchester and may have been originally placed at the bottom of the Benty Grange bowl What remains of one escutcheon belongs to Museums Sheffield and as of 2023 was in the collection of the Weston Park Museum The other is held by the Ashmolean Museum at the University of Oxford as of 2023 it was not on display Contents 1 Hanging bowls 2 Description 3 Parallels 4 Date 5 Discovery 5 1 Location 5 2 Excavation 5 3 Publication 6 Notes 7 References 8 BibliographyHanging bowls edit nbsp A 7th century hanging bowl with two hook escutcheons visible found at BagintonHanging bowls are thin walled bronze vessels with three or four equidistant hooks around the rim for suspension They are a fixture of Late Celtic Anglo Saxon and Viking archaeology and art spanning approximately 400 AD to 1100 AD 1 The hooks project from escutcheons bronze plates or frames that are usually circular or oval that are frequently elaborately decorated and that are riveted or soldered or occasionally both to the bowl 2 Basal escutcheons also known as basal discs would sometimes sit at the base of the interior 3 A 2005 catalogue of hanging bowls identified approximately 174 known examples around 68 of which were relatively complete 4 Within the British Isles England accounted for 117 Scotland for 7 and Ireland for 17 elsewhere Norway accounted for 26 and the remainder of Europe for 7 4 The purpose of hanging bowls and their places of manufacture is unknown 2 They appear to have been manufactured by Celtic makers in Britain in the post Roman period examples were also used by Anglo Saxons who likely received bowls via trade and later by Vikings 5 6 One possibility is that they were originally made by populations outside the sphere of Anglo Saxon control such as in the Severn Valley in southwest England and the Moray Firth in Scotland and as the Anglo Saxon kingdoms extended their territories were manufactured in progressively northern places such as Dal Riata Strathclyde and Pictland with the tradition ultimately taking root in Ireland also 6 7 Many suggestions have been made regarding the original use of hanging bowls including their use as lamps or lamp reflectors 8 votive vessels hung in churches 9 vessels for liturgical use such as washing hands or communion vessels 10 11 sanctuary lamps wayside drinking vessels of the sort Edwin of Northumbria is said to have provided for travelers 12 finger bowls 13 scale pans for weighing wool 14 magnetic compasses food containers holy water stoups wash basins and ceremonial vessels used in mead halls 15 16 When they were acquired by Anglo Saxons and Vikings the bowls likely took on even more uses 15 Whatever their original functional purpose by the seventh century hanging bowls appear to have been increasingly associated with wealth and the status of their owners 17 during the seventh and early eighth centuries hanging bowls were a common feature in richly furnished Anglo Saxon graves 18 By this point the role of hanging bowls as a status symbol may have been more important than any functional purpose 17 Description edit nbsp The INI monogram in the Durham Gospel Fragment contains similar fish like creatures Two escutcheons are all that remain of the Benty Grange hanging bowl 19 They are made of enamelled bronze and are 40 mm 1 6 in in diameter 19 They have the same design and plain frames parts of which survive 19 Both escutcheons are fragmentary enough survives of each for the design to be reconstructed 19 and because of overlapping segments for it to be certain that they represent two distinct pieces 20 Whether they are hook or basal escutcheons is uncertain but a contemporary watercolour by Llewellynn Jewitt suggests that a hook was present at excavation and an iron ring 2 millimetres in width and 16 in diameter stuck to the back of one fragment may have been part of a suspension chain 19 The decomposed enamel background appears uniformly yellow to the eye 21 as it did when excavated 22 23 24 A yellow creatures on red background colour scheme has alternatively been claimed 25 26 27 but no evidence for such a layout has been presented 21 As sampling of the enamel was not permitted when one of the escutcheons was analysed in 1968 the all yellow hypothesis is not definitive 28 note 2 The reconstructed design shows three ribbon style creatures resembling dolphins or fish depicted in and arranged in a circle with each biting the tail of the one in front 19 The bodies are defined by their outlines 20 They are limbless the tails curled in a circle the jaws long and curved and slightly ajar the bitten tails pass under each creature s upper jaw and over its lower but are missing where one would expect to see them passing through the gap between jaws 19 Each creature has a small eye shaped like a pointed oval 19 The outer borders of the discs the plain frames and the contours and eyes of the creatures are all tinned or silvered 19 Surviving records of the third escutcheon indicate that it was of a different style and size 19 20 Drawings by Bateman and Jewitt show it with a scroll pattern and small piece of frame 20 22 32 It appears to have been about half the size of the other two and may have originally been placed at the bottom of the hanging bowl 19 The escutcheons were presumably part of an entire hanging bowl when buried 19 Nothing else survives 19 A mass of corroded chainwork discovered 6 feet 1 8 m away which survives only in illustrations by Jewitt and descriptions by Bateman 33 34 is unlikely to be related although a large and intricate chain was found with a cauldron from Sutton Hoo the Benty Grange chains appear dissimilar 35 The Benty Grange chainwork was also probably too heavy to have been used to suspend the hanging bowl 35 Parallels edit nbsp Similar dolphin like creatures from the Book of DurrowThe dolphin like designs on the Benty Grange hanging bowl are paralleled by designs on other escutcheons and even more closely by designs on medieval illuminated manuscripts 25 36 Three escutcheons from a hanging bowl found in Faversham show creatures that also look like dolphins 37 38 39 but with more detailed bodies 36 a better parallel is with a disc found near the Lullingstone hanging bowl which dates to the late seventh century and is also decorated with dolphin like creatures 40 41 Two other sixth or seventh century discs found in Chilton and Coltishall also depict intertwined serpent like creatures attempting to eat their own tails 42 43 The third escutcheon from Benty Grange meanwhile surviving only in illustration is most closely paralleled by the basal disc of the Winchester hanging bowl 44 45 Even closer parallels to the Benty Grange designs are found in manuscript illustrations 36 Bateman remarked on this as early as 1861 noting that similar patterns were used in several manuscripts of the seventh Century for the purpose of decorating the initial letters 24 46 Metalwork designs like those on the Benty Grange escutcheons may have inspired aspects of the manuscript art 47 48 In particular the mid seventh century Durham Gospel Fragment contains two similar fish like motifs contained within the lateral stroke of the INI monogram that introduces the Gospel of Mark 20 49 The Book of Durrow also contains an illustration of similarly linked yellow dolphin like creatures 47 48 Date editThe Benty Grange hanging bowl is dated by most experts to the second half of the seventh century based on its design and the associated finds from the barrow in which it was found 44 Given the presence of a helmet and cup with silver crosses wrote Audrey Ozanne t he straightforward interpretation of this find would seem to be that it dates from a period subsequent to the official introduction of Christianity into Mercia in 655 50 51 52 The surviving escutcheons also suggest a date in the mid seventh century given their resemblance to the illustrations in the Durham Gospel Fragment and the Book of Durrow 53 54 the Winchester hanging bowl s basal disc which the third Benty Grange escutcheon resembles has traditionally been given the same date 26 55 Discovery editLocation edit nbsp Benty Grange Farm in the parish of Monyash in the Derbyshire Dales districtThe hanging bowl was discovered in a barrow on the Benty Grange farm in Derbyshire 56 in what is now the Peak District National Park 57 Thomas Bateman an archaeologist and antiquarian who led the excavation note 3 described Benty Grange as a high and bleak situation 56 its barrow which still survives is prominently located by a major Roman road 60 now roughly parallel to the A515 in the area 61 possibly to display the burial to passing travellers 62 63 The barrow is one of several tumuli in the vicinity and may have also been designed to share the skyline with two other nearby monuments Arbor Low stone circle and Gib Hill barrow 62 64 The seventh century Peak District was a small buffer province between Mercia and Northumbria occupied according to the Tribal Hidage by the Anglo Saxon Pecsaete 65 66 note 4 The area came under the control of the Mercian kingdom around the eighth century 66 the Benty Grange and other rich barrows suggest that the Pecsaete may have had their own dynasty beforehand but there is no written evidence for this 65 Excavation edit Bateman excavated the barrow on 3 May 1848 56 Although he did not mention it in his account he was probably not the first person to dig up the grave 71 The fact that the objects were found in two clusters 6 feet 1 8 m apart and that other objects that normally accompany a helmet such as a sword and shield were absent 72 suggests that the grave had previously been looted 71 Given the size of the mound an alternative or additional explanation is that it originally contained two burials only one of which Bateman discovered 73 note 5 The barrow comprises a circular central mound approximately 15 m 50 ft in diameter and 0 6 m 2 ft high an encircling fosse about 1 m 3 3 ft wide and 0 3 m 1 ft deep and outer penannular earthworks around 3 m 10 ft wide and 0 2 m 0 66 ft high 73 The entire structure measures approximately 23 by 22 m 75 by 72 ft 73 Bateman suggested a body once lay at its centre flat against the original surface of the soil 56 75 what he described as the one remnant strands of hair is now thought to be from a cloak of fur cowhide or something similar 76 The recovered objects were found in two clusters 71 77 78 One cluster was found in the area of the supposed hair the other about 6 ft 1 8 m to the west 77 78 In the latter area Bateman described a large mass of oxydized iron which when removed and washed presented itself as a jumbled collection of chainwork a six pronged piece of iron resembling a hayfork and the boar crested Benty Grange helmet 79 80 81 In the area of the supposed hair Bateman described a curious assemblage of ornaments which were difficult to remove successfully from the hardened earth 56 77 This included a cup identified as leather but probably of wood 82 83 approximately 3 in 7 6 cm in diameter at the mouth 56 22 Its rim was edged with silver 56 and its surface was decorated by four wheel shaped ornaments and two crosses of thin silver affixed by pins of the same metal clenched inside 24 Also found were a knot of very fine wire some thin bone variously ornamented with lozenges amp c attached to silk but that soon decayed when exposed to air and the Benty Grange hanging bowl 22 32 46 As Bateman described it The other articles found in the same situation are principally personal ornaments of the same scroll pattern as those figured at page 25 of the Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire 84 of these enamels there were two upon copper with silver frames and another of some composition which fell to dust almost immediately the prevailing colour in all is yellow 22 nbsp A contemporary watercolour by Llewellynn Jewitt depicts the surviving escutcheons top fragments of the third escutcheon second to bottom row and associated finds Bateman closed his 1848 account of the excavation by noting the particularly corrosive nature of the soil 85 which by 1861 he said has generally been the case in tumuli in Derbyshire 86 He suggested that this was the result of a mixing or tempering with some corrosive liquid the result of which is the presence of thin ochrey veins in the earth and the decomposition of nearly the whole of the human remains 86 Bateman s friend Llewellynn Jewitt an artist and antiquarian who frequently accompanied Bateman on excavations 87 painted four watercolours of the finds parts of which were included in Bateman s 1848 account 88 note 6 This was more than Jewitt produced for any other of their excavations a mark of the importance that they assigned to the Benty Grange barrow 88 The hanging bowl escutcheons entered Bateman s extensive collection On 27 October 1848 he reported his discoveries including the helmet cup and hanging bowl at a meeting of the British Archaeological Association 90 91 92 and in 1855 they were catalogued along with other objects from the Benty Grange barrow 93 In 1861 Bateman died at age 39 59 and in 1876 his son Thomas W Bateman loaned the collection to the town council the Corporation of Sheffield 94 It was displayed at the Weston Park Museum through 1893 at which point the younger Bateman having spent his father s fortune was forced to sell by order of chancery 95 96 The Corporation of Sheffield purchased many of the objects that had been excavated in Yorkshire Derbyshire and Staffordshire including the helmet the cup fittings and one of the hanging bowl escutcheons other pieces were dispersed by Sotheby s 96 97 and later in 1893 the second escutcheon was presented to the Ashmolean Museum at the University of Oxford by Sir John Evans 98 As of 2021 and 2023 respectively the escutcheons remain in the collections of the two museums 99 98 The Benty Grange barrow was designated a scheduled monument on 23 October 1970 73 The list entry notes that a lthough the centre of Benty Grange barrow has been partially disturbed by excavation the monument is otherwise undisturbed and retains significant archaeological remains 73 It goes on to note that further excavation would yield new information 73 The surrounding fields were designated a Site of Special Scientific Interest in 2013 and are used for agricultural 100 The nearby farmhouse was renovated between 2012 and 2014 101 102 as of 2023 is used as a holiday cottage 103 Publication edit Bateman published an article on the Benty Grange excavation in October 1848 five months after excavating the barrow in The Journal of the British Archaeological Association 104 The finds were included in his 1855 catalogue of his collection 105 and shortly before his death Bateman revised and expanded upon his 1848 account in his 1861 book Ten Years Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills 106 Llewellynn Jewitt commented upon the finds including the hanging bowl in his 1870 book Grave Mounds and their Contents 107 The hanging bowl was one of the first to be discovered and in 1898 John Romilly Allen included it among 16 examples in the first English article to discuss hanging bowls as a distinct class of artefact 108 109 It was frequently mentioned in the literature thereafter 36 including reconstructions by T D Kendrick in 1932 and 1938 110 111 Francoise Henry in 1936 112 Audrey Ozanne in 1962 1963 113 George Speake in 1980 114 and Jane Brenan in 1991 115 Rupert Bruce Mitford published a chapter on the Benty Grange burial in 1974 focusing on the helmet 116 and published what he termed a definitive reconstruction of the escutcheons in 1987 117 in his posthumous 2005 work A Corpus of Late Celtic Hanging Bowls he added a full description of the hanging bowl and a colour reconstruction of the escutcheons 118 Notes edit After Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pl 3 Very few hanging bowl escutcheons have yellow rather than red enamel 29 30 Many that appear yellow actually contain deteriorated red enamel such enamel tends to be chalky or powdery instead of glassy and visibly red enamel may remain underneath 29 31 Francoise Henry stated in 1936 that the Benty Grange escutcheons were yellow on red 25 as did Gunther Haseloff de in 1990 27 although he incorrectly attributed the two colour theory to Rupert Bruce Mitford 21 Bruce Mitford who conducted the 1968 analysis on the escutcheon at the Weston Park Museum wrote that n o slightest trace of red can be detected in the depths or fractures of the background or the body filling so far as these are visible 28 Because sampling was not permitted he termed the all yellow colour scheme a working hypothesis while also noting that the bodies are certainly yellow 28 Otherwise they would probably be yellow on red 28 Bateman excavated more than 500 barrows in his lifetime earning him the moniker The Barrow Knight 58 59 The Tribal Hidage is a list of territories south of the Humber sized by hides which were used as a measure of taxation 67 Though the list has been variously dated between the mid seventh and the late eighth centuries it may mix earlier and later calculations and include information from as late as the tenth century 68 69 it survives in several manuscripts the latest of which dates to around the eleventh century 70 Llewellynn Jewitt suggested in 1870 that there had been two burials writing that In this mound although a curious and unique helmet the silver mountings of a leather drinking cup some highly interesting and beautiful enamelled ornaments and other objects as well as indications of the garments remained not a vestige of the body with the exception of some of the hair was to be seen The lovely and delicate form of the female and the form of the stalwart warrior or noble had alike returned to their parent earth leaving no trace behind save the enamel of her teeth and traces of his hair alone while the ornaments they wore and took pride in and the surroundings of their stations remained to tell their tale at this distant date 74 The four watercolours are now in the collection of the Weston Park Museum 88 33 34 89 References edit Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 3 34 a b Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 3 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 11 a b Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 3 5 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 29 30 a b Webster 2012 pp 101 102 Youngs 2009 p 228 Henry 1936 pp 211 213 McRoberts 1963 pp 304 305 Liestol 1953 Bruce Mitford 1987 p 31 Colgrave amp Mynors 1969 p 193 Small Thomas amp Wilson 1973 pp 110 111 Mitchell 1923 p 71 n 31 a b Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 30 Fowler 1968 pp 287 288 a b Brenan 1991 p 135 Geake 1999 a b c d e f g h i j k l m Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 119 a b c d e Bruce Mitford 1974 p 250 n 5 a b c Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 77 119 a b c d e Bateman 1848b p 277 Bateman 1855 p 160 a b c Bateman 1861 p 29 a b c Henry 1936 p 236 a b Ozanne 1962 1963 pp 20 22 a b Haseloff 1990 p 162 a b c d Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 77 a b Brown 1981 pp 230 231 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 76 77 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 76 a b Bateman 1861 pp 29 30 a b Museums Sheffield chainwork 1 a b Museums Sheffield chainwork 2 a b Bruce Mitford 1974 p 250 n 6 a b c d Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 120 British Museum Faversham 1 British Museum Faversham 2 British Museum Faversham 3 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 72 120 175 428 Vierck 1970 p 45 Portable Antiquities Scheme Chilton 2017 Portable Antiquities Scheme Coltishall 2017 a b Ozanne 1962 1963 p 22 Winchester hanging bowl a b Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 224 225 a b Kendrick 1938 pp 100 101 a b Haseloff 1958 pp 87 88 Bruce Mitford 1987 p 37 Ozanne 1962 1963 p 20 Bruce Mitford 1974 p 242 Longley 1975 p 25 Henry 1936 pp 218 236 Brenan 1991 pp 68 72 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 132 136 a b c d e f g Bateman 1861 p 28 Lester 1987 p 34 Goss 1889 p 176 a b Howarth 1899 p v Ozanne 1962 1963 p 35 Derbyshire Historic Environment Record a b Brown 2017 p 21 Bruce Mitford 1974 p 224 Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 223 224 a b Yorke 1990 pp 9 12 102 106 108 a b Keynes 2014 p 312 Kirby 1991 p 9 Kirby 1991 pp 9 11 Blair 2014 Yorke 1990 pp 9 10 a b c Bruce Mitford 1974 p 229 Smith 1908 p 68 a b c d e f Historic England Benty Grange Jewitt 1870 p 211 Bateman 1848b p 276 Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 223 pl 73 a b c Bateman 1848b pp 276 277 a b Bateman 1861 pp 28 30 Bateman 1848b pp 277 278 Bateman 1861 pp 30 32 Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 225 227 Allen 1898 pp 46 47 47 n a Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 223 223 n 4 Bateman 1848a p 25 Bateman 1848b p 279 a b Bateman 1861 p 32 Goss 1889 pp 170 171 175 176 249 301 a b c Museums Sheffield escutcheon watercolour Museums Sheffield helmet watercolour The Times 1848 The Morning Post 1848 The Ipswich Journal 1848 Bateman 1855 pp 159 160 Howarth 1899 p iii Rushforth 2004 pp 114 115 a b Howarth 1899 pp iii iv 244 Rushforth 2004 p 115 a b Ashmolean Museum Museums Sheffield escutcheon Natural England Benty Grange SSSI Peak District Applications 2012 BentyGrange Twitter 2014 Peak Venues Benty Grange Bateman 1848a Bateman 1855 Bateman 1861 Jewitt 1870 pp 211 248 257 260 261 Allen 1898 pp 46 47 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 p 8 Kendrick 1932 p 178 Kendrick 1938 p 100 Henry 1936 p 235 Ozanne 1962 1963 p 21 Speake 1980 fig 11c Brenan 1991 p 188 Bruce Mitford 1974 pp 223 252 Bruce Mitford 1987 pp 35 37 Bruce Mitford amp Raven 2005 pp 119 120 pl 3b Bibliography edit nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Benty Grange hanging bowl Allen John Romilly 1898 Metal Bowls of the Late Celtic and Anglo Saxon Periods Archaeologia LVI London Society of Antiquaries of London 39 56 doi 10 1017 s0261340900003842 nbsp Anglo Saxon Antiquities The Times No 20 007 London 30 October 1848 p 4 via Newspapers com nbsp Anglo Saxon Antiquities The Morning Post No 23 370 London 1 November 1848 p 2 via Newspapers com nbsp Anglo Saxon Antiquities The Ipswich Journal No 5 713 Ipswich 4 November 1848 p 4 via Newspapers com nbsp Anglo Saxon bronze hanging bowl Hampshire Cultural Trust Retrieved 9 July 2021 nbsp Bateman Thomas 1848a Vestiges of the Antiquities of Derbyshire and the Sepulchral Usages of its Inhabitants from the Most Remote Ages to the Reformation London John Russell Smith nbsp Bateman Thomas October 1848b Description of the Contents of a Saxon Barrow The Journal of the British Archaeological Association IV 3 London Henry George Bohn 276 279 doi 10 1080 00681288 1848 11886866 nbsp Bateman Thomas 1855 A Descriptive Catalogue of the Antiquities and Miscellaneous Objects Preserved in the Museum of Thomas Bateman at Lomberdale House Derbyshire Bakewell James Gratton nbsp Bateman Thomas 1861 Barrows Benty Grange Near Monyash Ten Years Digging in Celtic and Saxon Grave Hills in the Counties of Derby Stafford and York from 1848 to 1858 with Notices of Some Former Discoveries Hitherto Unpublished and Remarks on the Crania and Pottery from the Mounds London John Russell Smith pp 28 33 nbsp Benty Grange BentyGrange 22 August 2014 We are proud to open the doors to Benty Grange to our first guests We couldn t have done it without PeakVenues THANKS Tweet Retrieved 10 February 2018 via Twitter nbsp Benty Grange Barn Conversion Peak Venues Peak Venues Retrieved 5 November 2023 nbsp Benty Grange SSSI Designated Sites Natural England Retrieved 18 December 2023 Blair John 2014 The Tribal Hidage In Lapidge Michael Blair John Keynes Simon amp Scragg Donald eds The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo Saxon England 2nd ed Chichester Blackwell Publishing pp 473 475 doi 10 1002 9781118316061 ch20 ISBN 978 0 470 65632 7 nbsp Brenan Jane 1991 Hanging Bowls and their Contexts An Archaeological Survey of Their Socio Economic Significance from the Fifth to Seventh Centuries A D British Archaeological Reports Vol 220 Tempus Reparatum ISBN 0 86054 724 8 Brown Antony October 2017 Dowlow Quarry ROMP Environmental Statement Appendix 10 2 Setting Assessment PDF ARS Ltd Reports 2017 82 Archived from the original PDF on 10 February 2018 nbsp Brown David 1981 Swastika Patterns In Evison Vera Ivy ed Angles Saxons and Jutes Essays Presented to J N L Myres Oxford Clarendon Press pp 227 240 ISBN 978 0 19 813402 2 Bruce Mitford Rupert 1974 Aspects of Anglo Saxon Archaeology Sutton Hoo and Other Discoveries London Victor Gollancz Limited ISBN 0 575 01704 X Bruce Mitford Rupert 1987 Ireland and the Hanging Bowls A Review In Ryan Michael ed Ireland and Insular Art A D 500 1200 Proceedings of a Conference at University College Cork 31 October 3 November 1985 Dublin Royal Irish Academy pp 30 39 ISBN 0 901714 54 2 Bruce Mitford Rupert amp Raven Sheila 2005 A Corpus of Late Celtic Hanging Bowls with an Account of the Bowls Found in Scandinavia Oxford Oxford University Press ISBN 978 0 19 813410 7 Colgrave Bertram amp Mynors R A B eds 1969 Bede s Ecclesiastical History of the English People Oxford Medieval Tests Oxford Clarendon Press nbsp Escutcheon of hanging bowl Ashmolean Museum University of Oxford Retrieved 5 November 2023 nbsp Fowler Elizabeth 1968 Hanging Bowls In Coles John Morton amp Simpson Derek Douglas Alexander eds Studies in Ancient Europe Essays Presented to Stuart Piggott Leicester Leicester University Press pp 287 310 ISBN 0 7185 1079 8 Fragments of enamelled escutcheon from Benty Grange I Dig Sheffield Museums Sheffield Retrieved 31 July 2018 nbsp Goss William Henry 1889 The Life and Death of Llewellynn Jewitt F S A Etc with Fragmentary Memoirs of Some of his Famous Literary and Artistic Friends Especially of Samuel Carter Hall F S A Etc London Henry Gray nbsp hanging bowl 1248 70 The British Museum Collection Online The British Museum Retrieved 21 July 2021 nbsp hanging bowl 1248 a 70 The British Museum Collection Online The British Museum Retrieved 21 July 2021 nbsp hanging bowl 1248 b 70 The British Museum Collection Online The British Museum Retrieved 21 July 2021 nbsp Haseloff Gunther 1958 Fragments of a Hanging Bowl from Bekesbourne Kent and Some Ornamental Problems PDF Medieval Archaeology 2 Translated by de Paor Liam 72 103 doi 10 1080 00766097 1958 11735474 nbsp Haseloff Gunther 1990 Email im fruhen Mittelalter Fruhchristliche Kunst von der Spatantike bis zu den Karolingern Enamel in the Early Middle Ages Early Christian Art from Late Antiquity to the Carolingians in German Marburg Hitzeroth ISBN 3 89398 020 2 Henry Francoise 31 December 1936 Hanging Bowls The Journal of the Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 7th series VI II Dublin Royal Society of Antiquaries of Ireland 209 246 JSTOR 25513828 nbsp Henry s original drawing available at Sketch of Benty Grange escutcheon UCD Digital Library University College Dublin Retrieved 2 April 2020 nbsp Historic England Benty Grange hlaew Monyash 1013767 National Heritage List for England Retrieved 10 February 2018 nbsp Howarth Elijah 1899 Catalogue of the Bateman Collection of Antiquities in the Sheffield Public Museum London Dulau and Co nbsp Geake Helen 1999 When Were Hanging Bowls Deposited in Anglo Saxon Graves PDF Medieval Archaeology 43 1 18 doi 10 1080 00766097 1999 11735623 nbsp Jewitt Llewellynn 1870 Grave Mounds and their Contents A Manual of Archaeology as Exemplified in the Burials of the Celtic the Romano British and the Anglo Saxon Periods London Groombridge and Sons nbsp Kendrick T D June 1932 British Hanging Bowls Antiquity VI 22 161 184 doi 10 1017 S0003598X00006700 S2CID 163210163 nbsp Kendrick T D 1938 Anglo Saxon Art to A D 900 London Methuen amp Co Ltd nbsp Keynes Simon 2014 Mercia In Lapidge Michael Blair John Keynes Simon amp Scragg Donald eds The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Anglo Saxon England 2nd ed Chichester Blackwell Publishing pp 311 313 doi 10 1002 9781118316061 ch13 ISBN 978 0 470 65632 7 nbsp Kirby David Peter 1991 The Tribal Hidage The Earliest English Kings London Unwin Hyman pp 9 12 ISBN 0 04 445691 3 Lester Geoff Fall 1987 The Anglo Saxon Helmet from Benty Grange Derbyshire PDF Old English Newsletter 21 1 34 35 ISSN 0030 1973 nbsp Liestol Aslak 1953 The Hanging Bowl a Liturgical and Domestic Vessel Acta Archaeologica XXIV 163 170 ISSN 0065 101X Longley David 1975 Hanging Bowls Penannular Brooches and the Anglo Saxon Connexion British Archaeological Reports Vol 22 McRoberts David 1963 The Ecclesiastical Significance of the St Ninian s Isle Treasure Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland XCIV Edinburgh Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 301 314 doi 10 9750 PSAS 094 301 314 Mitchell Hugh Parker February 1923 Flotsam of Later Anglo Saxon Art I The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs LXII CCXXXIX 63 72 JSTOR 861685 Ozanne Audrey 1962 1963 The Peak Dwellers PDF Medieval Archaeology 6 7 15 52 doi 10 1080 00766097 1962 11735659 nbsp Record ID BERK F72627 Early Medieval Mount Portable Antiquities Scheme 13 March 2017 Retrieved 4 November 2023 nbsp Record ID ESS 806BCA Early Medieval Mount Portable Antiquities Scheme 20 April 2017 Retrieved 4 November 2023 nbsp Rushforth Rebecca 2004 The Barrow Knight the Bristol Bibliographer and a Lost Old English Prayer Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society XIII 1 112 131 JSTOR 41154940 nbsp Site record MDR11318 Roman Road The Street conjectural route of Buxton to Derby High Peak and Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire Historic Environment Record Derbyshire County Council 27 September 2023 Retrieved 9 November 2023 nbsp Small Alan Thomas Charles amp Wilson David M 1973 St Ninian s Isle and its Treasure Text Vol I London Oxford University Press ISBN 0 19 714101 3 Smith Reginald Allender 1908 Untitled Notes on Brooches Bronze Hanging Bowls and Enamelled Mounts Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of London 2nd series XXII London Society of Antiquaries of London 63 86 doi 10 1017 S0950797300002158 nbsp Speake George 1980 Anglo Saxon Animal Art Oxford Clarendon Press ISBN 0 19 813194 1 LCCN 79 41091 Vierck Hayo December 1970 Cortina Tripodis Zu Aufhangung und Gebrauch subromischer Hangebecken aus Britannien und Irland Fruhmittelalterliche Studien in German 4 8 52 doi 10 1515 9783110242041 8 S2CID 188786864 nbsp Watercolour of finds from Benty Grange including escutcheon and cup fittings I Dig Sheffield Museums Sheffield Retrieved 5 December 2018 nbsp Watercolour Showing Fragments of Metal Chainwork I Dig Sheffield Museums Sheffield Retrieved 3 August 2018 nbsp Watercolour Showing Fragments of Metal Chainwork I Dig Sheffield Museums Sheffield Retrieved 3 August 2018 nbsp Watercolour showing the helmet from Benty Grange I Dig Sheffield Museums Sheffield Retrieved 5 December 2018 nbsp Webster Leslie 2012 Anglo Saxon Art A New History London The British Museum Press ISBN 978 0 7141 2809 2 Weekly List of Applications Validated by the Authority Applications validated between 18 072012 24 07 2012 PDF Peak District National Park Authority Archived from the original PDF on 24 June 2017 Retrieved 10 February 2018 nbsp Yorke Barbara 1990 Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo Saxon England London Routledge ISBN 0 415 16639 X Republished as an ebook as Yorke Barbara 2003 1990 Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo Saxon England PDF London Routledge ISBN 0 203 44730 1 nbsp Youngs Susan 2009 Anglo Saxon Irish and British Relations Hanging Bowls Reconsidered In Graham Campbell James amp Ryan Michael eds Anglo Saxon Irish Relations before the Vikings Oxford Oxford University Press pp 205 230 doi 10 5871 bacad 9780197264508 003 0009 ISBN 978 0 19 726450 8 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Benty Grange hanging bowl amp oldid 1211198456, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.