Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi (consul 133 BC)

For other people with the same name, see Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi.

Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi (c. 180 – 112 BC) was a Roman politician and historian. He created the first permanent jury court in Rome (quaestio perpetua) to try cases related to provincial corruption during his plebeian tribunate in 146 BC. He also fought, not entirely successfully, in the First Servile War. He was consul in 133 BC and censor in 120 BC.

Later in life, he wrote the Annales, a history of Rome from its foundation through to at least 146 BC and probably his own time; only 49 fragments of the Annales survive, preserved in other works. Consisting of seven or eight books, it was the first history to split up Roman history into a year-by-year account.

Family

Piso belonged to the plebeian gens Calpurnia, which emerged during the First Punic War and was of Etruscan descent.^[1] The Pisones were the most important family of the gens and remained on the fore of Roman politics during the Empire; their first member was Gaius Calpurnius Piso, praetor in 211, also grandfather of this Piso.^[2] The praetor of 211 had two sons, Gaius, the first consul of the gens in 180 who also earned a triumph for his successful command in Spain in 186, and Lucius, only known as ambassador to the Achaean League in 198; the latter was the father of the historian.^[3] The next generation of the Calpurnii Pisones had an impressive number of consuls – four in 16 years – as in addition to Piso's own consulship in 133, his cousins Lucius Caesoninus, Gnaeus, and Quintus were also consuls, respectively in 148, 138 and 135.^[4] Piso was likely born between 182 and 179.^[5]

This Piso had a homonymous son, who was later praetor in 112 BC.^[6] The son's line eventually produced the Gaius Calpurnius Piso who was the husband of Cicero's daughter Tullia.^[7]

Career

Tribunate and lex Calpurnia

Piso probably did his ten-year military service between 165 and 152.^[4] Piso is first mentioned in the sources as plebeian tribune in 149. The previous year, the propraetor Servius Sulpicius Galba had slaughtered eight or nine thousand Lusitanians through treachery. After accepting their unconditional surrender in good faith, he rounded up entire Lusitanian communities, disarmed them, and then massacred their male populations en masse before enslaving the remainder.^[8][9]

When Galba returned to Rome in 149, he was sued before the people by Lucius Scribonius Libo, Piso's colleague as tribune of the plebs; despite Cato the Censor's vehement support of the accusation, Galba was acquitted.^[8] Both Cato and Piso had clients in Spain who were worried by Galba's exactions; they asked their patrons to protect them. Piso therefore brought the lex Calpurnia de repetundis, which established the first permanent criminal court to judge Roman governors' provincial misdeeds.^[10] Before 149, governors were judged by an ad hoc court which was only sometimes created for that purpose.^[11]

The lex Calpurnia provided that the peregrine praetor directed the court and chose the jurors from the senate; governors found guilty had to repay the sums extorted.^[12] The law was a milestone in Roman criminal law – it "provided the model for other permanent criminal tribunals" in the future^[13] – and reflected the concern in the senate that unchecked gubernatorial avarice and disregard for norms of war would alienate provincial populations and harm Rome's foreign reputation.^[14]

Praetorship

 

The area controlled by the slaves during the First Servile War.

Piso was certainly praetor before 135 BC, as the lex Villia required a three-year wait between holding two magistracies (and Piso was consul in 133). The dominant opinion among modern scholars is that Piso served as praetor in Sicily in a year between 138 and 136, and he was defeated by the revolted slaves of Eunus during the First Servile War.^[15][16] However, knowledge of this war is very poor, and mostly comes from epitomes deriving from the lost books of Livy's Ab Urbe Condita. The only mention of Piso as praetor in ancient sources is found in the epitome of Florus (dating from the 2nd century AD), who says that "The camps even of praetors (the utmost disgrace of war) were taken by him [Eunus]; nor will I shrink from giving their names; they were the camps of [Manlius], Lentulus, Piso, and Hypsaeus".^[17][18] From there, it has been assumed that Florus gave the names of the successive Sicilian praetors in reverse chronological order between 138 and 135.^[19]

Corey Brennan, a classicist, nevertheless notes that Florus is often careless in his chronology, and also frequently mixes commanders' titles. What he calls "praetor" could have been legate, quaestor, praetor, or even consul.^[20] Therefore, Brennan suggests instead that Piso did not serve in Sicily as praetor, but only as consul in 133.^[21] Since Florus tells Piso was defeated, it would be very strange to see him winning the consular election at the first possible occasion: the other identified commanders fared far more poorly, either disappearing from history altogether or waiting many years until their consulships.^[22][23]

Consulship

Piso was elected consul for 133 BC with Publius Mucius Scaevola as his colleague.^[24] Scaevola and Piso are respectively described as consul prior and posterior, which means the comitia centuriata elected Scaevola first.^[25] He was assigned Sicily as his province and commanded the war against the slaves,^[26] while Scaevola remained in Rome. Sicily was initially given to a praetor, but since the praetors sent in 136 and 135 against the revolted slaves were defeated, the senate dispatched a consul in 134 to deal with them; however, the previous consul, Gaius Fulvius Flaccus, did nothing of note.

Piso probably picked the praetor Marcus Perperna to serve with him in Sicily, because he was a homo novus with an Etruscan background.^[27] He likely started his campaign by taking Morgantina and besieging Henna, the epicentre of the rebellion, because several sling bullets bearing his name have been found in the area.^[28] Then, Piso might have left the conduct of the siege to Perperna while he campaigned in another part of Sicily.^[29] The First Servile War ended the following year when the consul Publius Rupilius captured Tauromenium and Perperna took Henna.^[27][30]

Gracchan opposition

Since Piso was in Sicily during his entire consulship, ancient sources do not tell his attitude towards Tiberius Gracchus, who as plebeian tribune moved an ambitious set of reforms to redistribute Roman public lands. It is generally assumed that Piso was among his opponents, because he was later an outspoken enemy of Gaius Gracchus (Tiberius' younger brother), but several politicians initially supported Tiberius and later opposed his reforms or his attempt to be reelected as tribune, starting with Scaevola, Piso's consular colleague.^[31] D C Earl suggests that Piso initially regarded Tiberius' program with a "benevolent neutrality" as he had connections with the Fulvii Flacci and the patrician Claudii, who were Gracchan allies.^[32]

The main anecdote for Piso's opposition is an anecdote placed in his mouth by Cicero. According to Cicero, after Gaius Gracchus passed a law establishing a subsidised grain supply over Piso's opposition, Piso appeared in the queue and when Gaius enquired as to his hypocrisy, he responded "I'm not keen, Gracchus... on you getting the idea of sharing out my property man by man, but if that's what you're going to do, I'll take my cut".^[33][34][35]

Censorship

Piso was elected censor in 120 together with the plebeian Quintus Caecilius Metellus Baliaricus.^[36] The Fasti Capitolini are missing for these years, but since later writers citing or mentioning Piso tell he was censor, he must have been censor in 120 as it is the only year available. As a result, nothing is known of the censors' activity, apart that they likely reappointed Publius Cornelius Lentulus as princeps senatus.^[37]

The censors' election took place in the aftermath of the murder of Gaius Gracchus and his supporters in 121, which saw the domination of the conservative faction led by the powerful Caecilii Metelli family, and further indicates Piso's conservative background.^[38]

The Annales

At the end of his life, Piso wrote a history of Rome, following several earlier Roman statesmen who wrote history, such as Cato the Censor, or Aulus Postumius Albinus. Among the 19 mentions of Piso's work found in ancient sources, 16 call it Annales, suggesting that was Piso's title.^[39][40][41] The last dated fragment of the Annales deals with the fourth ludi saeculares, an event taking place in 146, so Piso likely started his book after this date. As there are an unusual number of references to censorial activity in the Annales' fragments, it is probable that Piso wrote them in his later years, after his own censorship in 120, a situation similar to that of Cato who composed the Origines in his last years.^[42] Moreover, later authors who cite Piso often call him Censorius ("the censor"), suggesting he was already an ex-censor when he wrote it.^[43][44] This additional name might have been used by Piso in his work.^[43]

The Annales were written in at least seven books, from the legendary foundation of Rome by Aeneas to Piso's own times. Like most other Roman historians, Piso devoted a significant portion of the work to mythologic times and the Regal period, covered in the first book.^[40] The second book likely covered the beginnings of the Republic to a milestone event such as the Fall of Veii in 396, or the Sack of Rome in 387. The third book probably described the events up to the War against Pyrrhus (280–275) or the First Punic War (264–241).^[45] The chronology for the remaining four books is lacking; Piso possibly wrote about the events down to the second half of the 2nd century by covering one generation per book.^[46] The majority of modern historians think that Piso continued his work after the last fragment dated from 146 in order to describe the events of his consulship and censorship.^[47] The existence of an 8th book has been suggested, in which Piso could have written an apologia of his political deeds during his magistracies.^[45][48]

His historical account, now lost and known to us from only forty-nine short quotations or paraphrases, was written in a simple style of Latin.^[49] He also was likely the first to have incorporated material from the annales maximi – the records kept by the pontiffs – into a historical work.^[50] He also revised the genealogy of the Tarquins, connecting Tarquinius Superbus as grandson of Tarquinius Priscus rather than as son due to chronological improbability of a direct relationship when taking into account the intervening 44-year reign of Servius Tullius.^[51] Later historians relied upon his work, though many did not find it satisfactory. Cicero considered his work jejune, and Livy did not consider him fully reliable, due to his tendency to moralize and politicize the histories that he recounted.^[52][53] Aulus Gellius, however, an admirer of its archaic style, commended the work and quoted the only major fragment that has survived until today.^[53]

Moreover, the early 19th-century iconoclastic historian, Barthold Georg Niebuhr, wrote that Piso was the first Roman historian to introduce systematic forgeries.^[52] Despite its shortcomings, Piso's historical work is important because it was the first time that an account was structured into individual years, making it the earliest history to follow the so-called "annalistic scheme."^[54] Modern historians also value the fragments contained in it as reflecting earlier traditions free from latter-day inventions and insertions.^[55]

List of fragments

Cornell n°	Forsythe n°	Peter n°	Piso's book n°	author	ref.	subject
1	2	1	1	Varro	Rust. ii. 1 § 9	Etymology of Italy
2	4	41	1	Lactantius	Inst. i. 6 § 9	Name of a Sibyl
3	5		1	OGR	x. 1-2	Aeneas in Italy
4	6		1	OGR	xiii. 8	Suicide of Amata
5	9	3	1	Diodorus	i. 75 § 4 – 84 § 1	Story of Romulus and Remus
6	4	4	1	Servius	Aen. ii. 761	The Roman asylum
7	11	5	1	Diodorus	ii. 38 § 2 – 40 § 3	Story of Tarpeia
8	12	6	1	Varro	Ling. v. 148, 149	Etymology of the Lacus Curtius
9	14	7	1	Tertullian	Spect. v. 8	Creation of the Tarpeian/Capitoline Games by Romulus
10	13	8	1	Aulus Gellius	xi. 14	Romulus' wine consumption
11	15	9	1	Varro	Ling. v. 165	Foundation of the Temple of Janus
12	17	10	1	Pliny the Elder	HN, ii. 140	Numa summoning thunderbolts
13	18	12	1	Plutarch	Numa, 21 § 7	Death of King Numa Pompilius
14	19	11	1	Pliny the Elder	HN, xiii. 84–87	Quintus Petillius burns Numa's books
15a	17	10	1	Pliny the Elder	HN, ii. 140	Numa summoning thunderbolts
15b	20	13	1	Pliny the Elder	HN, xxviii. 13, 14	Death of King Tullus Hostilius
16	21	14	1	Diodorus	iv. 15 § 5	First census of Servius Tullius
17	23	17	1	Priscian	GL, ii. 497	Marriage of Tarquin's daughter?
18	22A	15	1 or 2	Diodorus	iv. 7 § 1–5	Descendants of Tarquin
19	24	17	1 or 2	Livy	i. 55 § 7–9	Construction cost of the Temple of Jupiter
20	26	19	2	Aulus Gellius	xv. 29	Abdication of L. Tarquinius Collatinus in 509
21	25	18	2	Priscian	GL, ii. 510, 511	Rape of Lucretia?
22	27	20	2 or 3	Pliny the Elder	HN, xxxiv. 29	Building of the statue of Cloelia in 508 or 507
23	28	21	2 or 3	Pliny the Elder	HN, xxxiii. 38	Gold crown given by A. Postumius Albus after his victory in 499
24	29	22	2 or 3	Livy	ii. 32 § 3	First Secession of the Plebs in 494
25	30	23	2 or 3	Livy	ii. 58 § 1, 2	Number of the tribune of the plebs in 471
26	31	24	2 or 3	Diodorus	xii. 4 § 2–5	Murder of Spurius Maelius by Gaius Servilius Ahala
27	32	25	2 or 3	Diodorus	xii. 9 § 3	First celebration of the lectisternium in 399
28	36	26	2 or 3	Livy	ix. 44 § 2–4	Name of the consuls in 308 and 305
29	37	27	3	Aulus Gellius	vii. 9	Gnaeus Flavius' aedileship in 304
30	38	28	3–7	Livy	x. 9 § 12, 13	Names of the aediles in 299
31	39	29	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, xvi. 192	Building time of the fleet during the First Punic War, in 263
32	40	30	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, viii. 16, 17	Elephants during the triumph of L. Caecilius Metellus in 250
33	41	31	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, xvi. 192	Triumph of Gaius Papirius Maso on the Alban mount.in 231
34	42	32	3–7	Livy	xxv. 39 § 11–17	Aftermath of the Upper Baetis, and victories of L. Marcius in 211
35	43	33	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, xviii. 41–43	Trial of Gaius Furius Chresimus in 191
36	44	34	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, xxxiv. 14	Riches brought to Rome by Gnaeus Manlius Vulso in 187
37	45	35	3–7	Pliny the Elder	HN, iii. 131	M. Claudius Marcellus destroys a Gallic town near Aquileia in 186
38	46	36	3–7	Censorinus	17 § 13	Date of the 6th saeculum

See also

• Annals & Annalists
• Roman historiography

References

Citations

1. Forsythe 1994, pp. 3–4.
2. Forsythe 1994, pp. 1–2.
3. Forsythe 1994, pp. 8–9.
4. Forsythe 1994, p. 12.
5. Forsythe 1994, pp. 12–13.
6. Zmeskal 2009, p. 61.
7. Zmeskal 2009, pp. 61–62, 272.
8. Gruen 1968, p. 12; Forsythe 1994, p. 14.
9. Baker 2021, pp. 185–87, 198–199 nn. 22–26, citing, among others, App. Hisp. 59–60; Liv. Per. 49.
10. Broughton 1951, p. 459.
11. Lintott 1999, p. 158, citing Cic. Brut. 27; Verr. 3.195, 4.56; Off. 2.75. Constitution of an ad hoc tribunal was usually after a senatorial recommendation to that effect. Lintott 1999, p. 157.
12. Brennan 2000, pp. 235–36.
13. Lintott 1999, p. 158.
14. Forsythe 1994, pp. 16, 17; Baker 2021, p. 188.
15. Broughton 1951, pp. 483 n. 1, 484, tentatively placing Piso's praetorship in 138. Sumner 1973, p. 59 notes that evidence of his praetorship is "virtually non-existent".
16. Forsythe 1994, pp. 17, 19.
17. Florus, ii. 7.
18. Brennan 1993, pp. 163, 164.
19. Broughton 1951, p. 483 n. 1.
20. Brennan 1993, p. 165 n. 1.
21. Brennan 1993, pp. 166, 167 n. 1, 184.
22. Forsythe 1994, pp. 19, 20 (note 49).
23. Brennan 1993, p. 167 n. 1.
24. Broughton 1951, p. 492.
25. Taylor & Broughton 1949, p. 6.
26. Broughton 1951, p. 492, citing Val. Max. 2.7.9, 4.3.10; Frontin. Str. 4.1.26; Oros. 5.9.6.
27. Forsythe 1994, pp. 20–21.
28. Badian 2016; Broughton 1951, p. 492; CIL I, 847.
29. Forsythe 1994, p. 20.
30. Broughton 1951, p. 498, citing Flor. 2.7.8, who reports that Perperna took Enna by famine.
31. Earl 1960, pp. 291–92.
32. Earl 1960, pp. 293, 296–97.
33. Beard, Mary (2015). SPQR: a history of ancient Rome (1st ed.). New York: Liveright Publishing. p. 299. ISBN 978-0-87140-423-7. OCLC 902661394.
34. Garnsey & Rathbone 1985, p. 20; Cic. Tusc. 3.20.48.
35. Cicero (2009) [1st century BC]. Cicero on the Emotions: Tusculan Disputations 3 and 4. Translated by Graver, Margaret. University of Chicago Press. Book 3 § 48 = p. 23. ISBN 978-0-226-30519-6. 'I would prefer that you refrain from distributing my property to the people, Gracchus; but if you do it, I want my share'
36. Broughton 1951, p. 523. "Piso... must be dated to this censorship since the [c]ensors of all other possible years, including 108, are known".
37. Ryan 1998, pp. 187–189, 223.
38. Forsythe 1994, p. 34.
39. Forsythe 1994, pp. 38–39.
40. Chassignet 1999, p. xxii.
41. Popjoy, M P. "L. Calpurnius Piso Frugi". In Cornell (2013), p. 234.
42. Forsythe 1994, pp. 32–34.
43. Forsythe 1994, p. 35.
44. Popjoy 2013, p. 234, says that the latter argument is the stronger of the two.
45. Forsythe 1994, p. 39.
46. Chassignet 1999, p. xxii–xxiii.
47. Chassignet 1999, p. xxiv.
48. Chassignet 1999, p. xxv.
49. Forsythe, Gary (2012). "Calpurnius Piso Frugi, Lucius". Encyclopedia of Ancient History. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah08030. ISBN 9781405179355.
50. Forsythe 2005, p. 72.
51. Forsythe 2005, p. 97.
52. Browne, Robert William (1853). A History of Roman Classical Literature. Philadelphia: Blanchard and Lea. p. 183. Retrieved 1 September 2016. Piso was the first Roman historian to introduce systematic forgeries.
53. Badian 2016.
54. Feldherr, Andrew; Hardy, Grant (2011). The Oxford History of Historical Writing. Vol. 1. Oxford University Press. p. 266. ISBN 9780191036781. Retrieved 2 September 2016.
55. See eg Forsythe 2005, p. 326, using fragments of Piso to show a late change to the identifies of the curule aediles of 299 BC by Licinius Macer.

Modern sources

• Badian, Ernst (2016-03-07) [2012 in OCD⁴]. "Calpurnius Piso Frugi, Lucius". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Classics. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.1312. ISBN 978-0-19-938113-5. Retrieved 2023-04-28.
• Baker, Gabriel David (2021). Spare no one: mass violence in Roman warfare. Lanham, Maryland. ISBN 978-1-5381-1220-5. OCLC 1182021748.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Brennan, T Corey (1993). "The commanders in the First Sicilian Slave War". Rivista di Filologia e Istruzione Classica. 121: 153–84. doi:10.7282/T3639S55.
• Brennan, T Corey (2000). The praetorship in the Roman Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-511459-0. OCLC 41503761. (Two volumes.)
• Broughton, Thomas Robert Shannon (1951). The magistrates of the Roman republic. Vol. 1. New York: American Philological Association.
• Chassignet, Martine, ed. (1999). L'annalistique romaine. Vol. 2. Paris: Les belles lettres. ISBN 2-251-01392-X. OCLC 35205019.
• Cornell, Tim; et al., eds. (2013). The fragments of the Roman historians. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-927705-6. OCLC 859181028.
• Earl, D C (1960). "Calpurnii Pisones in the second century BC". Athenaeum. 38. Pavia: 283–98. ProQuest 1300400937.
• Forsythe, Gary (1994). The historian L Calpurnius Piso Frugi and the Roman annalistic tradition. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. ISBN 0-8191-9742-4. OCLC 31130983.
• Forsythe, Gary (2005). A critical history of early Rome. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94029-1. OCLC 70728478.
• Garnsey, Peter; Rathbone, Dominic (1985). "The background to the grain law of Gaius Gracchus". Journal of Roman Studies. 75: 20–25. doi:10.2307/300649. ISSN 1753-528X. JSTOR 300649. S2CID 159639695.
• Gruen, Erich S (1968). Roman politics and the criminal courts, 149-78 B.C. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-28421-0. OCLC 576654216.
• Lintott, Andrew (1999). Constitution of the Roman republic. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926108-6. Reprinted 2009.
• Münzer, F; Cichorius, C (1896). "Calpurnius 96" . Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft (in German). Vol. III, 1. Stuttgart: Butcher. cols. 1392–95 – via Wikisource.
• Peter, Hermann, ed. (1914). Historicorum Romanorum reliquiae. Vol. 1 has title:Veterum historicorum romanorum reliquiae (in Latin). Leipzig.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) (Two volumes.)
• Ryan, Francis X (1998). Rank and participation in the republican senate. Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN 978-3-515-07093-5.
• Sumner, G V (1973). The orators in Cicero's Brutus: prosopography and chronology. Heritage. University of Toronto Press. ISBN 9781487585532. JSTOR 10.3138/j.ctvcj2j22.
• Taylor, L R; Broughton, T R S (1949). "The Order of the Two Consuls' Names in the Yearly Lists". Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome. 19: 1–14. doi:10.2307/4238618. ISSN 0065-6801. JSTOR 4238618.
• Zmeskal, Klaus (2009). Adfinitas (in German). Vol. 1. Passau: Verlag Karl Stutz. ISBN 978-3-88849-304-1.

Ancient sources

• Aulus Gellius, Attic Nights.
• Censorinus, De Die Natali.
• Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca historica.
• Florus, Epitome of Roman History (English translation by John Selby Watson on Wikisource)
• Livy, Ab Urbe Condita Libri.
• Origo gentis romanae.
• Pliny the Elder, Historia Naturalis (English translation by Harris Rackham, W.H.S. Jones, and D.E. Eichholz on Wikisource).
• Plutarch, Parallel lives (Numa).

Political offices
Preceded by Scipio Aemilianus II Gaius Fulvius Flaccus	Roman consul 133 BC With: Publius Mucius Scaevola	Succeeded by P. Popillius Laenas Publius Rupilius