Underwater acoustic communication

Underwater acoustic communication is a technique of sending and receiving messages in water.^[1] There are several ways of employing such communication but the most common is by using hydrophones. Underwater communication is difficult due to factors such as multi-path propagation, time variations of the channel, small available bandwidth and strong signal attenuation, especially over long ranges. Compared to terrestrial communication, underwater communication has low data rates because it uses acoustic waves instead of electromagnetic waves.

Example of multi-path propagation

At the beginning of the 20th century some ships communicated by underwater bells as well as using the system for navigation. Submarine signals were at the time competitive with the primitive maritime radionavigation.^[2] The later Fessenden oscillator allowed communication with submarines.

Types of modulation used for underwater acoustic communications

In general the modulation methods developed for radio communications can be adapted for underwater acoustic communications (UAC). However some of the modulation schemes are more suited to the unique underwater acoustic communication channel than others. Some of the modulation methods used for UAC are as follows:

• Frequency-shift keying (FSK)
• Phase-shift keying (PSK)
• Frequency-hopping spread spectrum (FHSS)
• Direct-sequence spread spectrum (DSSS)
• Frequency and pulse-position modulation (FPPM and PPM)
• Multiple frequency-shift keying (MFSK)
• Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM)

The following is a discussion on the different types of modulation and their utility to UAC.

Frequency-shift keying

FSK is the earliest form of modulation used for acoustic modems. FSK usually employs two distinct frequencies to modulate data; for example, frequency F1 to indicate bit 0 and frequency F2 to indicate bit 1. Hence a binary string can be transmitted by alternating these two frequencies depending on whether it is a 0 or 1. The receiver can be as simple as having analogue matched filters to the two frequencies and a level detector to decide if a 1 or 0 was received. This is a relatively easy form of modulation and therefore used in the earliest acoustic modems. However more sophisticated demodulator using digital signal processors (DSP) can be used in the present day.

The biggest challenge FSK faces in the UAC is multi-path reflections. With multi-path (particularly in UAC) several strong reflections can be present at the receiving hydrophone and the threshold detectors become confused, thus severely limiting the use of this type of UAC to vertical channels. Adaptive equalization methods have been tried with limited success. Adaptive equalization tries to model the highly reflective UAC channel and subtract the effects from the received signal. The success has been limited due to the rapidly varying conditions and the difficulty to adapt in time.

Phase-shift keying

Phase-shift keying (PSK) is a digital modulation scheme that conveys data by changing (modulating) the phase of a reference signal (the carrier wave). The signal is impressed into the magnetic field x,y area by varying the sine and cosine inputs at a precise time. It is widely used for wireless LANs , RFID and Bluetooth communication.

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing

Orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) is a digital multi-carrier modulation scheme. OFDM conveys data on several parallel data channels by incorporating closely spaced orthogonal sub-carrier signals.

OFDM is a favorable communication scheme in underwater acoustic communications thanks to its resilience against frequency selective channels with long delay spreads.^[3][4][5]

Use of vector sensors

Compared to a scalar pressure sensor, such as a hydrophone, which measures the scalar acoustic field component, a vector sensor measures the vector field components such as acoustic particle velocities. Vector sensors can be categorized into inertial and gradient sensors.^[6]

Vector sensors have been widely researched over the past few decades.^[7][8] Many vector sensor signal processing algorithms have been designed.^[9]

Underwater vector sensor applications have been focused on sonar and target detection.^[8] They have also been proposed to be used as underwater multi‐channel communication receivers and equalizers.^[10] Other researchers have used arrays of scalar sensors as multi‐channel equalizers and receivers.^[11][12]

Applications

Underwater telephone

The underwater telephone, also known as UQC, AN/WQC-2, or Gertrude, was used by the U.S. Navy in 1945 ^[13] after in Kiel, Germany, in 1935 different realizations at sea were demonstrated.^[14] The terms UQC and AN/WQC-2 follow the nomenclature of the Joint Electronics Type Designation System.^[15] The type designation "UQC" stands for General Utility (multi use), Sonar and Underwater Sound and Communications (Receiving/Transmitting, two way). The "W" in WQC stands for Water Surface and Underwater combined. The underwater telephone is used on all crewed submersibles and many Naval surface ships in operation. Voice or an audio tone (morse code) communicated through the UQC are heterodyned to a high pitch for acoustic transmission through water.^[16]

JANUS

In April 2017, NATO's Centre for Maritime Research and Experimentation announced^[17] the approval of JANUS, a standardized protocol to transmit digital information underwater using acoustic sound (like modems and fax machines do over telephone lines).^[18] Documented in STANAG 4748, it uses 900 Hz to 60 kHz frequencies at distances of up to 28 kilometres (17 mi).^[19][20] It is available for use with military and civilian, NATO and non-NATO devices; it was named after the Roman god of gateways, openings, etc.

The JANUS specification (ANEP-87) provides for a flexible plug-in-based payload scheme. A baseline JANUS packet consists of 64 bits to which further arbitrary data (Cargo) can be appended.^[21] This enables multiple different applications such as Emergency location, Underwater AIS (Automatic Identification System), and Chat. An example of an Emergency Position and Status message is the following JSON representation^[22][23]:

{  "ClassUserID":0,  "ApplicationType":3,  "Nationality":"PT",  "Latitude":"38.386547",  "Longitude":"-9.055858",  "Depth":"16",  "Speed":"1.400000",  "Heading":"0.000000",  "O2":"17.799999",  "CO2":"5.000000",  "CO":"76.000000",  "H2":"3.500000",  "Pressure":"45.000000",  "Temperature":"21.000000",  "Survivors":"43",  "MobilityFlag":"1",  "ForwardingCapability":"1",  "TxRxFlag":"0",  "ScheduleFlag":"0" } 

This Emergency Position and Status Message (Class ID 0 Application 3 Plug-in) message shows a Portuguese submarine at 38.386547 latitude -9.055858 longitude at a depth of 16 meters. It is moving north at 1.4 meters per second, and has 43 survivors on board and shows the environmental conditions.

Underwater messaging

Commercial hardware products have been designed to enable two-way underwater messaging between scuba divers.^[24][25] These support sending from a list of pre-defined messages from a dive computer using acoustic communication.

Research efforts have also explored the use of smartphones in water-proof cases for underwater communication, using acoustic modem hardware as phone attachments^[26] as well as using a software app without any additional hardware.^[27] The Android software app, AquaApp, from University of Washington uses the microphones and speakers on existing smartphones and smart watches to enable underwater acoustic communication.^[28] It had been tested to send digital messages using smartphones between divers at distances of up to 100 m.^[27]

See also

• Acoustic communication in aquatic animals
• Acoustic communication in fish
• Telecommunications
• Acoustic release – Oceanographic device recovery method
• Underwater acoustics – Study of the propagation of sound in water

References

1. I. F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, "Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks: Research Challenges," Ad Hoc Networks (Elsevier), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257-279, March 2005.
2. "Submarine Signaling on Steamships". www.ggarchives.com. Retrieved 2016-01-18.
3. E. Demirors, G. Sklivanitis, T. Melodia, S. N. Batalama, and D. A. Pados, "Software-defined Underwater Acoustic Networks: Toward a High-rate Real-time Reconfigurable Modem," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 64 – 71, November 2015.
4. S. Zhou and Z.-H. Wang, OFDM for Underwater Acoustic Communications. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2014.
5. E. Demirors, G. Sklivanitis, G.E. Santagati, T. Melodia, and S. N. Batalama, "Design of A Software-defined Underwater Acoustic Modem with Real-time Physical Layer Adaptation Capabilities," in Proc. of ACM Intl. Conf. on Underwater Networks & Systems (WUWNet), Rome, Italy, November 2014.
6. Gabrielson, T. B. (2001). Design problems and limitations in vector sensors (PDF). Workshop on Directional Acoustic Sensors. Newport, RI. p. 29.
7. Proc. AIP Conf. Acoustic Particle Velocity Sensors: Design, Performance, and Applications, Mystic, CT, 1995.
8. A. Nehorai and E. Paldi, “Acoustic vector-sensor array processing,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 42, pp. 2481–2491, 1994.
9. K. T. Wong & H. Chi, "Beam Patterns of an Underwater Acoustic Vector Hydrophone Located Away from any Reflecting Boundary," IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 628-637, July 2002.
10. A. Abdi and H. Guo, “A new compact multichannel receiver for underwater wireless communication networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 8, pp. 3326‐3329, 2009.
11. T. C. Yang, “Temporal resolutions of time-reversal and passive phase conjugation for underwater acoustic communications,” IEEE J. Oceanic Eng., vol. 28, pp. 229–245, 2003.
12. M. Stojanovic, J. A. Catipovic, and J. G. Proakis, “Reduced-complexity spatial and temporal processing of underwater acoustic communication signals,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., vol. 98, pp. 961–972, 1995.
13. Quazi, A.; Konrad, W. (March 1982). "Underwater Acoustic Communications". IEEE Comm Magazine. pp. 24–29.
14. Nissen, I. (March 2017). "GERTRUDE - 80 years underwater telephony". DAGA 2017. pp. 1–13.
15. "Acoustic influence of underwater mobile survey vehicles on the soundscape of Pacific rockfish habitat". pubs.aip.org. Retrieved 2023-07-03.
16. "How is sound used to communicate underwater?". Discovery of Sound in the Sea. University of Rhode Island. 2021.
17. "A new era of digital underwater communications". NATO. 2017-04-27.
18. "JANUS Community Wiki".
19. Brown, Eric (2017-08-15). "The Internet of Underwater Things: Open Source JANUS Standard for Undersea Communications". Linux.com. The Linux Foundation.
20. Nacini, Francesca (2017-05-04). "JANUS creates a new era for digital underwater communications". Robohub.
21. "ANEP-87 Ed: A, Ver. 1, DIGITAL UNDERWATER SIGNALLING STANDARD FOR NETWORK NODE DISCOVERY & INTEROPERABILITY". NATO Standardization Office. March 2017.
22. "Popoto User's Guide PMM5021" (PDF). p. 44.
23. "JANUS Community Wiki | Class User Id: 002 Underwater AIS". JANUS Community Wiki. Retrieved 2023-07-15.
24. "Israel's UTC brings text-messaging underwater [VIDEO]". ISRAEL21c. 2008-02-04. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
25. "Ultrasonic dive computer lets divers communicate through "pings"". New Atlas. 2019-02-08. Retrieved 2022-08-30.
26. Restuccia, Francesco; Demirors, Emrecan; Melodia, Tommaso (2017-11-06). "ISonar". Proceedings of the International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems. Halifax NS Canada: ACM. pp. 1–9. doi:10.1145/3148675.3148710. ISBN 978-1-4503-5561-2. S2CID 11584770.
27. Chen, Tuochao; Chan, Justin; Gollakota, Shyamnath (2022-08-22). "Underwater messaging using mobile devices". Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2022 Conference. Amsterdam Netherlands: ACM. pp. 545–559. doi:10.1145/3544216.3544258. ISBN 978-1-4503-9420-8. S2CID 251496040.
28. "Finally, an underwater messaging app". TechCrunch. 29 August 2022. Retrieved 2022-08-30.

External links

• Jarrot, A., Ioana, C., Quinquis, A. (2005), "Denoising underwater signals propagating through multi-path channels", Europe Oceans 2005, IEEE, pp. 501-506 Vol. 1, doi:10.1109/OCEANSE.2005.1511765, ISBN 0-7803-9103-9, S2CID 32055087
• DSPComm – underwater acoustic modem manufacturer
• uWAVE - the smallest underwater acoustic modem
• NetSim UWAN - underwater acoustic network simulation