Robert Louis Schulz is a political activist and the Founder and Chairman of the We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, a non-profit education and research organization with the declared mission "to protect and defend individual Rights as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States."
An engineer by training, Schulz has filed over one hundred court actions on a pro se basis, against government actions he asserts are unconstitutional deprivations of individual liberty.[citation needed]
In 1994, Schulz was on the New York State ballot as the Libertarian candidate for Governor, after nominee Howard Stern dropped out of the race.[1]
In 2006, Schulz was under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in connection with an alleged failure to file federal income tax returns for years 2001 through 2004.[2]
Injunction against Schulzedit
On August 9, 2007, the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an order including an injunction permanently barring Schulz and his We the People Foundation from (1) advising or instructing persons or entities that they are not required to file federal tax returns or pay federal taxes (see Tax protester arguments); (2) selling or furnishing any materials purporting to enable individuals to discontinue or stop withholding or paying federal taxes; (3) instructing, advising or assisting anyone to stop withholding or stop paying federal employment or income taxes; and (4) obstructing or advising anyone to obstruct IRS examinations, collections, or other IRS proceedings.[3] The court found that Schulz and the We the People Foundation were engaging in illegal activity that was exposing individuals to criminal liability in connection with federal income taxes. In February 2008, that decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. In its decision, the Court of Appeals stated:
The district court found that defendants' illegal activities were harming individuals, who were exposing themselves to criminal liability by following the defendants' ill-conceived instructions. ... Requiring defendants to provide the identity and contact information of the recipients of the tax materials enables the government to monitor the defendants' obligation under the injunction to provide a copy of the district court's order to recipients of the tax materials. Moreover, the district court found that the defendants' illegal actions were harming the government ... Requiring defendants to provide the identity and contact information [ . . . ] enables the government to monitor whether the recipients of defendants' materials are violating the tax laws. Thus, we find no abuse of discretion with respect to the district court's imposition of the reporting requirements in Paragraph C of the injunction.[4]
Contempt proceedingedit
On April 7, 2008, the government filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York, asking the court to hold Robert L. Schulz and the We the People Foundation in civil contempt of court for failure to comply with the court order requiring Schulz to turn over, to the government, the names and contact information of the individuals who had received tax materials from the Foundation.[5] On April 28, 2008, the District Court issued an order holding Schulz and the other defendants in contempt of court, imposing fines of $2,000 per day[6] on Schulz, the We the People Foundation, and the We the People Congress, effective retroactively to April 28, 2008, if the defendants did not comply with the court order by 4:00 p.m. on Monday, May 5, 2008.[7] At 3:55 pm on May 5, 2008, Schulz filed a document with the court asserting that he had turned the material over to the United States attorney's office earlier that day.[8]
Other activitiesedit
On December 1, 2008, Schulz questioned whether President-elect Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States. He placed an ad which he claimed to be worth "tens of thousands" of dollars in the Chicago Tribune to express his foundation's belief.[9] The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has published an article asserting that in 2009, Schulz began "to play a key role in building a larger movement, one with concerns that went far beyond challenging the legality of taxes and Obama's holding the office of president."[10] The SPLC asserts that Schulz has been playing a "key, and little-noticed, part in the dramatic expansion of the radical right...."[11]
Referencesedit
^Schulz v. Williams, vol. 44, November 1, 1994, p. 48, retrieved 2019-08-27
^See generally Schulz v. United States, 2006-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,481 (D. Neb. 2006), aff'd per curiam, 2007-2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) paragr. 50,701 (8th Cir. 2007).
^Decision and Order, Aug. 9, 2007, docket entry 30, United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress, case no. 1:07-cv-0352, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
^United States v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress, Inc., Feb. 22, 2008, per curiam opinion, p. 3 & 4, case no. 07-3729-cv, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
^Brief in Support of Motion for Contempt, April 7, 2008, docket entry 50, United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress, case no. 1:07-cv-0352, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
^Reismann, Nick (2008-05-01). "Fort Ann tax protester cited for contempt of court". The Post-Star. Retrieved 2015-12-27.
^Decision and Order, April 28, 2008, docket entry 54, United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress, case no. 1:07-cv-0352, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
^"Declaration #15 by Defendant Schulz," May 5, 2008, docket entry 58, United States of America v. Robert L. Schulz, We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, Inc., and We the People Congress, case no. 1:07-cv-0352, United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
^Olkon, Sara; Janega, James. "Tax activist's ad challenges Obama's eligibility for office". Chicago Tribune. Retrieved 2015-12-27.
^Heidi Beirich, with contribution by Janet Smith, "Midwifing the Militias," Intelligence Report, Southern Poverty Law Center, Spring 2010, Issue Number 137, at [1].
robert, schulz, other, people, named, robert, schulz, robert, schulz, disambiguation, robert, louis, schulz, political, activist, founder, chairman, people, foundation, constitutional, education, profit, education, research, organization, with, declared, missi. For other people named Robert Schulz see Robert Schulz disambiguation Robert Louis Schulz is a political activist and the Founder and Chairman of the We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education a non profit education and research organization with the declared mission to protect and defend individual Rights as guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States An engineer by training Schulz has filed over one hundred court actions on a pro se basis against government actions he asserts are unconstitutional deprivations of individual liberty citation needed In 1994 Schulz was on the New York State ballot as the Libertarian candidate for Governor after nominee Howard Stern dropped out of the race 1 Contents 1 Federal tax problems 1 1 Injunction against Schulz 1 2 Contempt proceeding 2 Other activities 3 References 4 External linksFederal tax problems editIn 2006 Schulz was under investigation by the Internal Revenue Service IRS in connection with an alleged failure to file federal income tax returns for years 2001 through 2004 2 Injunction against Schulz edit On August 9 2007 the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York issued an order including an injunction permanently barring Schulz and his We the People Foundation from 1 advising or instructing persons or entities that they are not required to file federal tax returns or pay federal taxes see Tax protester arguments 2 selling or furnishing any materials purporting to enable individuals to discontinue or stop withholding or paying federal taxes 3 instructing advising or assisting anyone to stop withholding or stop paying federal employment or income taxes and 4 obstructing or advising anyone to obstruct IRS examinations collections or other IRS proceedings 3 The court found that Schulz and the We the People Foundation were engaging in illegal activity that was exposing individuals to criminal liability in connection with federal income taxes In February 2008 that decision was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit In its decision the Court of Appeals stated The district court found that defendants illegal activities were harming individuals who were exposing themselves to criminal liability by following the defendants ill conceived instructions Requiring defendants to provide the identity and contact information of the recipients of the tax materials enables the government to monitor the defendants obligation under the injunction to provide a copy of the district court s order to recipients of the tax materials Moreover the district court found that the defendants illegal actions were harming the government Requiring defendants to provide the identity and contact information enables the government to monitor whether the recipients of defendants materials are violating the tax laws Thus we find no abuse of discretion with respect to the district court s imposition of the reporting requirements in Paragraph C of the injunction 4 Contempt proceeding edit On April 7 2008 the government filed a motion in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York asking the court to hold Robert L Schulz and the We the People Foundation in civil contempt of court for failure to comply with the court order requiring Schulz to turn over to the government the names and contact information of the individuals who had received tax materials from the Foundation 5 On April 28 2008 the District Court issued an order holding Schulz and the other defendants in contempt of court imposing fines of 2 000 per day 6 on Schulz the We the People Foundation and the We the People Congress effective retroactively to April 28 2008 if the defendants did not comply with the court order by 4 00 p m on Monday May 5 2008 7 At 3 55 pm on May 5 2008 Schulz filed a document with the court asserting that he had turned the material over to the United States attorney s office earlier that day 8 Other activities editOn December 1 2008 Schulz questioned whether President elect Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States He placed an ad which he claimed to be worth tens of thousands of dollars in the Chicago Tribune to express his foundation s belief 9 The Southern Poverty Law Center SPLC has published an article asserting that in 2009 Schulz began to play a key role in building a larger movement one with concerns that went far beyond challenging the legality of taxes and Obama s holding the office of president 10 The SPLC asserts that Schulz has been playing a key and little noticed part in the dramatic expansion of the radical right 11 References edit Schulz v Williams vol 44 November 1 1994 p 48 retrieved 2019 08 27 See generally Schulz v United States 2006 2 U S Tax Cas CCH paragr 50 481 D Neb 2006 aff d per curiam 2007 2 U S Tax Cas CCH paragr 50 701 8th Cir 2007 Decision and Order Aug 9 2007 docket entry 30 United States of America v Robert L Schulz We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc and We the People Congress case no 1 07 cv 0352 United States District Court for the Northern District of New York United States v Robert L Schulz We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc and We the People Congress Inc Feb 22 2008 per curiam opinion p 3 amp 4 case no 07 3729 cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Brief in Support of Motion for Contempt April 7 2008 docket entry 50 United States of America v Robert L Schulz We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc and We the People Congress case no 1 07 cv 0352 United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Reismann Nick 2008 05 01 Fort Ann tax protester cited for contempt of court The Post Star Retrieved 2015 12 27 Decision and Order April 28 2008 docket entry 54 United States of America v Robert L Schulz We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc and We the People Congress case no 1 07 cv 0352 United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Declaration 15 by Defendant Schulz May 5 2008 docket entry 58 United States of America v Robert L Schulz We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education Inc and We the People Congress case no 1 07 cv 0352 United States District Court for the Northern District of New York Olkon Sara Janega James Tax activist s ad challenges Obama s eligibility for office Chicago Tribune Retrieved 2015 12 27 Heidi Beirich with contribution by Janet Smith Midwifing the Militias Intelligence Report Southern Poverty Law Center Spring 2010 Issue Number 137 at 1 Id External links editDaniel B Evans et al Robert Schulz from Tax Protester Dossiers Gurus and Other Big Fish We The People Foundation Archives Appearances on C SPAN Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Robert L Schulz amp oldid 1155430235, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
