fbpx
Wikipedia

Prevalence of circumcision

The prevalence of circumcision is the percentage of males in a given population who have been circumcised, with the procedure most commonly being performed as a part of preventive healthcare, a religious obligation, or cultural practice. Yosha & Bolnick & Koyle (2012) states that circumcision rates are likely to increase during the "first half of the twenty-first century".[1]

Map of circumcision prevalence, based on a 2007 WHO report
  Widespread, near-universal: >80% prevalence
  Widespread, common: 20–80% prevalence
  Uncommon: <20% prevalence
  N/A

Since 2010, both the World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS have been promoting a higher rate of circumcision prevalence as a prevention against HIV transmission and some STIs in areas with high HIV transmission and low circumcision rates.[2][3][4][5] According to Hay & Levin, 2012, around 50% of all circumcisions worldwide are performed for reasons of preventive healthcare, while the other 50% are predominately performed for religious or cultural reasons.[6]

Overview edit

Present edit

Rates vary widely, from over 90% in Israel and many Muslim-majority countries, 86.3% in South Korea, to 80% in the United States, to 58% in Australia, to 45% in South Africa, to 20.7% in the United Kingdom, to under 1% in Japan and Honduras.[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]

In 2016, the global prevalence of circumcision was estimated to be around 38%, with notable increases of circumcision prevalence seen in the United States, the Middle East; and Africa; major medical organizations have promoted a higher rate of circumcision in Africa as a preventive against the spread of HIV/AIDS.[14][16] In 2020, the World Health Organization reiterated that it is an efficacious prophylactic intervention if carried out by medical professionals under safe conditions in areas of high HIV/AIDS prevalence.[17][18]

Between 2008 and 2010, circumcision prevalence and incidence in the United States were estimated to be around 80%. Wolters Kluwer estimated that closer to 80% of males in 2021 were circumcised.[19][9] The continent of Africa, similarly, has widely adopted the practice as a preventive measure against the spread of HIV. While it has overwhelming prevalence in the Muslim world and in Israel due to the religious beliefs of most Muslims and Jews; however, some non-Muslim groups living within Muslim-majority countries, such as Armenians and Assyrians, do not practice it.[20] It is prevalent in some Muslim-majority countries in southeast Asia such as Indonesia and Malaysia; however, the WHO states that there is "little non-religious circumcision in Asia, with the exceptions of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines".[11] In parts of Africa it is often practiced as part of tribal customs from Christians, Muslims and Animists. In contrast, rates are much lower in most of Europe, parts of southern Africa, most of Asia, Oceania and Latin America, constituting South America, Central America, the Caribbean and Mexico.[21] Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom are examples of countries that have seen a decline in male circumcision in recent decades, while there have been indications of increasing demand in southern Africa, partly for preventive reasons due to the HIV epidemic there.[22]

Africa edit

Studies suggest that about 62% of African males are circumcised.[23] However, the rate varies widely between different regions, and among ethnic and religious groups, with Muslim North Africans practising it for religious reasons, central Africans as part of ethnic rituals or local custom, and some traditionally non-circumcising populations in the South recently adopting the practice due to measures by the World Health Organisation to prevent AIDS.[24] Williams, B.G. et al. commented that: "Most of the currently available data on the prevalence of [male circumcision] are several decades old, while several of the recent studies were carried out as adjuncts to demographic and health surveys and were not designed to determine the prevalence of male circumcision."[25]

Prevalence of circumcision in Africa
Country WHO

(2006)[26]

Williams et al

(2006)[25]

Morris et al

(2016)[13][27]

  Angola >80 66 57.5
  Central African Republic 20–80 67 63
  Chad >80 64 73.5
  Republic of the Congo >80 70 70
  Democratic Republic of the Congo >80 70 97.2
  Gabon >80 93 99.2
  Burundi <20 2 61.7
  Djibouti >80 94 96.5
  Eritrea >80 95 97.2
  Ethiopia >80 76 92.2
  Kenya >80 84 91.2
  Rwanda <20 10 13.3
  Somalia >80 93 93.5
  Sudan 20–80 47 39.4
  Tanzania 20–80 70 72
  Uganda 20–80 25 26.7
  Botswana <20 25 15.1
  Lesotho 20–80 0 52
  Malawi <20 17 21.6
  Mozambique 20–80 56 47.4
  Namibia <20 15 25.5
  South Africa 20–80 35 44.7
  Eswatini <20 50 8.2
  Zambia <20 12 21.6
  Zimbabwe <20 10 9.2
  Benin >80 84 92.9
  Burkina Faso >80 89 88.3
  Cameroon >80 93 94
  Equatorial Guinea >80 86 87
  Gambia >80 90 94.5
  Ghana >80 95 91.6
  Guinea >80 83 84.2
  Guinea-Bissau >80 91 93.3
  Côte d'Ivoire 20–80 93 96.7
  Liberia >80 70 97.7
  Mali >80 95 86
  Mauritania >80 78 99.2
  Niger >80 92 95.5
  Nigeria >80 81 98.9
  Senegal >80 89 93.5
  Sierra Leone >80 90 96.1
  Togo >80 93 95.2

Less than 20% edit

Botswana, Rwanda, Eswatini, Zimbabwe.[13][27]

Between 20% and 80% edit

Angola, Burundi, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo (Rep), Lesotho, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia.[13][27]

South Africa edit

It is estimated that 48.7% of males are circumcised in South Africa.[13] One national study reported that 54.2% of black Africans were circumcised, with 32.1% of those traditionally circumcised and 13.4% circumcised for medical reasons.[28]

More than 80% edit

Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Congo (Dem Rep), Cote d'Ivoire, Djibouti, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Mali, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Togo.[13][27]

Americas edit

Less than 20% edit

Less than 20% of the population are circumcised in Argentina, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Lucia, The Bahamas, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, Venezuela.[26]

The Bahamas edit

The reported circumcision rate for younger individuals (age 15–18) is 16.7% (2019).[29]

Argentina edit

The circumcision rate among homosexual men in Buenos Aires is reported to be 13% (2013).[30]

Brazil edit

The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6.9%.[31] The reported rate is 13% in Rio de Janeiro, indicating possible differences between urban and rural rates.[32]

Colombia edit

The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6.9%.[31]

Between 20% and 80% edit

Mexico edit

In 2006 the prevalence of circumcision in Mexico was estimated to be 10% to 31%.[33] A recent (2020) HIV study conducted in Mexico City found a participant circumcision rate of 23% (255 / 1118).[34]

Puerto Rico edit

In 2012 a random sample of male visitors to a STI center in San Juan were surveyed on various topics, the reported circumcision rate was 32.4%.[35]

Canada edit

 
Rate of neonatal circumcision by province according to the Maternity Experiences Survey in 2006–2007[36]

Circumcision in Canada followed the pattern of other English speaking countries, with the practice being adopted during the 1900s on hygienic grounds, but with the rate of circumcision declining in the latter part of the 20th century, particularly after a new policy position was released in 1975.[37][38] The Canadian Paediatric Society estimated that, in 1970, 48 percent of males were circumcised.[39] However, studies conducted in 1977–1978 revealed a wide variation in the incidence of circumcision between different provinces and territories. For example, Yukon reported a rate of 74.8 percent, while Newfoundland reported an incidence of 1.9 to 2.4 percent.[40] The rate continued to drop, with the newborn circumcision rate in Ontario in 1994–95 dropping to 29.9%.[41]

A survey of Canadian maternity practices conducted in 2006/2007, and published in 2009 by the national public health agency, found a newborn circumcision rate of 31.9%.[36] Rates varied markedly across the country, from close to zero in Newfoundland and Labrador to 44.3% in Alberta and 43.7% in Ontario. In 2015, the Canadian Paediatric Society used those statistics in determining the national circumcision rate it currently quotes.[36][42]

A more recent survey conducted in 2011 on expecting couples in Saskatchewan (average age 30.3) found the circumcision rate of the male participants to be 61%.[43]

Table: Percentage of mothers reporting having their baby circumcised, by region (2006/07) [36]
Province/Territory % Province/Territory %
Alberta 44.3 New Brunswick 18.0
Ontario 43.7 Quebec 12.3
Prince Edward Island 39.2 Northwest Territories 9.7
Saskatchewan 35.6 Nova Scotia 6.8
Canada 31.9 Newfoundland and Labrador *
Manitoba 31.6 Nunavut *
British Columbia 30.2 Yukon *
* Numerator too small for rate calculation

Over 80% edit

United States edit

As of 2014, an estimated 80.5% of American men are circumcised, and the prevalence of the procedure is considered to be near-universal in the country.[14][44] The CDC has estimated the present rate of circumcision in the United States to be 81%; Morris et al. found a somewhat lower present incidence of 77% in 2010. During the 2000s, the prevalence of circumcision in men aged 14–59 differed by race: 91 percent of non-Hispanic white men, 76 percent of black men, and 44 percent of Hispanic men (of any race) were circumcised, according to Mayo Clinic Proceedings.[14] Wolters Kluwer estimated that closer to 80% of males in 2021 were circumcised.[19]

Medicaid funding for infant circumcision used to be available in every state, but starting with California in 1982, 18 states (Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah, and Washington) had eliminated Medicaid coverage of routine circumcision by July 2011.[45] One study in the Midwest of the U.S. found that this had no effect on the newborn circumcision rate but it did affect the demand for circumcision at a later time.[46] Another study, published in early 2009, found a difference in the neonatal male circumcision rate of 24% between states with and without Medicaid coverage. The study was controlled for other factors such as the percentage of Hispanic patients.[47]

The CDC uses two data sources to track circumcision rates. The first is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which records circumcisions performed at any time at any location. The second is the National Hospital Discharge Survey (NHDS), which does not record circumcisions performed outside the hospital setting or those performed at any age following discharge from the birth hospitalization.[48] Methodologically flawed calculations throughout the 2000s and 2010s showed the rate decreasing off of these statistics, but this data is believed to be misleading due to an increasing trend of performing neonatal circumcisions outside of hospitals, a trend not reflected in hospital discharge data.[19][49][50]

Circumcision was the second-most common procedure performed on patients under one year of age, after routine inoculations and prophylactic vaccinations.[51] There are various explanations for why the infant circumcision rate in the United States is different from comparable countries. Many parents' decisions about circumcision are preconceived, which may contribute to the high rate of elective circumcision.[52] Brown & Brown (1987) reported the most correlated factor is whether the father is circumcised.[53]

Asia edit

Less than 20% edit

Armenia, Bhutan, Burma, China, Cambodia, Hong Kong,[54] India, Japan, Laos, Mongolia, Nepal, North Korea, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam.[26]

India edit

According to the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) the overall circumcision rate in India is 16%.[55]

China edit

The overall prevalence of circumcision in China is reported to be 14%.[13]

Hong Kong edit

A sample of children aged < 12 found a circumcision rate of 3.4% (1982).[54] A survey on men who regularly visit female sex workers from 2012 found a circumcision rate of 28%.[56]

Singapore edit

The prevalence of circumcision in Singapore is estimated to be 14.9%.[13]

Taiwan edit

It is estimated that the circumcision rate for men aged 20–40 is between 10 and 15%.[57]

Cambodia edit

The overall prevalence of circumcision in Cambodia is reported to be 3.5%.[31]

Between 20% and 80% edit

Indonesia, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, and South Korea.[58]

South Korea edit

Circumcision is largely a modern-day phenomenon in South Korea. While during the twentieth century the rate of circumcision increased to around 80%, virtually no circumcision was performed prior to 1945, as it was against Korea's long and strong tradition of preserving the body as a gift from parents.[58][better source needed] A 2001 study of 20-year-old South Korean men found that 78% were circumcised.[59] At the time, the authors commented that "South Korea has possibly the largest absolute number of teenage or adult circumcisions anywhere in the world. Because circumcision started through contact with the American military during the Korean War, South Korea has an unusual history of circumcision." According to a 2002 study, 86.3% of South Korean males aged 14–29 were circumcised.[8] In 2012, it is the case of 75.8% of the same age group. Only after 1999 has some information against circumcision become available (at the time of the 2012 study, only 3% of Korean internet sites, using the most popular Korean search engine Naver, were against indiscriminate circumcision and 97% were for).[58] The authors of the study speculate "that the very existence of information about the history of Korean circumcision, its contrary nature relative to a longstanding tradition, its introduction by the US military, etc., has been extremely influential on the decision-making process regarding circumcision."[58]

More than 80% edit

Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh,[13] Bahrain, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Israel,[60] Pakistan,[13] Jordan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, the Philippines,[31] Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, the United Arab Emirates and Yemen.[26]

The overall prevalence of circumcision (tuli) in the Philippines is reported to be 92.5%. Most circumcisions in the Philippines are performed between the ages of 11 and 13.[61][62]

Europe edit

Less than 20% edit

Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany,[63] Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Serbia, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine,[26] and the United Kingdom.[64]

Germany (10.9 - 18.8%) edit

In Germany, the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents found in 2007 that 10.9% of boys aged 0–17 had been circumcised.[63] An online survey of 110,964 German youth (aged ≥ 12) found a circumcision rate of 18.8% (as of March 2023).[65] The majority of the procedures (69%) were performed for medical reasons, while 19% were performed on religious grounds.

United Kingdom (15.8%) edit

A national survey on sexual attitudes in 2000 found that 15.8% of men or boys in the United Kingdom (ages 16–44) were circumcised by their parents' choosing, while 11.7% of 16- to 19-year-olds, and 19.6% of 40- to 44-year-olds said they had been circumcised. Apart from black Caribbeans, men born overseas were more likely to be circumcised.[64] Rickwood et al. reported that the proportion of English boys circumcised for medical reasons had fallen from 35% in the early 1930s to 6.5% by the mid-1980s. As of 2000 an estimated 3.8% of male children in the UK were being circumcised for medical reasons by the age of 15.[66] The researchers stated that too many boys, especially under the age of 5, were still being circumcised because of a misdiagnosis of phimosis. They called for a target to reduce the percentage to 2%.

The Netherlands (9 - 16%) edit

Among participants of the HELIUS study, recruited between 2011 and 2015 (age 18–70), the circumcision rate for Dutch men without a migration background was 9%. The rate was > 95% for men of Moroccan, Turkish or Ghanaian background.[67] A small study from 2019 that recruited homosexual men suffering from various STD's found that 16% of the participants were circumcised.[68]

France (14%) edit

In France, according to a telephone survey (TNS Sofres Institute, 2008), 14% of men are circumcised.[69]

Bulgaria (13.4%) edit

The circumcision rate in Bulgaria is estimated to be 13.4%.[13]

Russia (11.8%) edit

The circumcision rate in Russia is estimated to be 11.8%.[13]

Sweden (11.8%) edit

A study on hypospadias in 2016 recruited a control group (i.e. men without hypospadias) via the Swedish Population Registry; the reported circumcision rate of the controls was 11.8% with a mean age was 33.[70]

Denmark (1.6 - 7%) edit

In 1986, 511 out of approximately 478,000 Danish boys aged 0–14 years were circumcised. This corresponds to a cumulative national circumcision rate of around 1.6% by the age of 15 years.[71]

A recent survey (2017-2018) called Project SEXUS surveyed 62,675 Danes aged 15–89 years on sexual topics. The survey found the male circumcision rate to be 7%. Of the respondents 5% were circumcised for medical or other reasons, while 2% were circumcised for religious or traditional reasons.[72]

Spain (6.6%) edit

The overall prevalence of circumcision in Spain is reported to be 6.6%.[13]

Poland (5%) edit

A 2017 survey of Polish university students (average age - 25) found a circumcision rate of 5%.[73] This figure is an estimate and fully representative only for students of the university where the survey took place. A 2016 study estimated a prevalence rate of 0.11% in total population.[13]

Slovenia (8.5%) edit

In Slovenia, a 1999–2001 national probability sample of the general population aged 18–49 years found that overall, 4.5% of Slovenian male citizens reported being circumcised. Prevalence strongly varied across religious groups, with 92.4% of Muslims being circumcised, 1.7% of Roman Catholics, 0% of other religious affiliations (Evangelic, Serbian Orthodox, other), and 7.1% of those with no religious affiliation.[74]

The circumcision rate was reported to be 8.5% in 2016.[13]

Finland (2-4%) edit

In Finland, the overall prevalence of circumcision is 2–4%, according to a recent publication by the Finnish Health Ministry.[75]

Croatia (1.34%) edit

A 2016 report found that the circumcision rate in Croatia was 1.34%.[13]

Between 20% and 80% edit

 
Circumcision rate by region in Albania for males aged 15–49, 2017–2018

Belgium,[76][77] Albania, Kosovo, North Macedonia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina.[26]

Bosnia-Herzegovina (58.7% or 41.6%) edit

In Bosnia-Herzegovina the circumcision rate was 58.7% in 2018.[78] This study shows shows 41.6% of circumcision rate in Bosnia-Herzegovina.[79]

Albania (36.8% or 47.7%) edit

In Albania during the years 2008–09 the percentage of men age 15–49 who reported having been circumcised was 47.7%.[80] In the years 2017–18 the circumcision rate in Albania had declined to 36.8%.[81]

Belgium (~ 22%) edit

A study on genital sensitivity from 2013 recruited ~1400 adult men through leaflets randomly distributed at railway stations in Belgium. In this study 22.6% of the participants reported being circumcised.[76] The majority identified as being Caucasian with only a very small minority reporting being Asian, Arabic or African. In another more recent (2023) and similarly designed study on genital sensitivity 21.7% (152 out of 702) of participants reported being circumcised.[77]

According to data from the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI or RIZIV), the number of circumcisions performed in Belgium amounted to 25,286 in the year of 2011. The vast majority of the procedures were performed on individuals aged < 16 years old. If this rate remains stable it is estimated that over time the circumcision rate for boys aged 16 will reach 31.71%.[82]

Over 80% edit

Kosovo (91.7%), Azerbaijan (98.5%) and Turkey (98.6%).[13]

Oceania edit

Australia edit

Circumcision reached its peak in Australia in the 1950s with a rate of more than 80%, but has steadily fallen to an estimated 26% in 2012. The rate of circumcision has dropped rapidly over the years. It is estimated that roughly 80 percent of males 35 and under are not circumcised.[83]

The Australian Longitudinal Study of Health and Relationships is a computer assisted telephone interview of males aged 16–64 that uses a nationally representative population sample.[84] In 2005 the interview found that the prevalence of circumcision in Australia was roughly 58%. Circumcision status was more common with males over 30 than males under 30, and more common with males who were born in Australia. 66% of males born in Australia were circumcised and less than 1/3 of males under 30 were circumcised.[7] There has been a decline in the rate of infant circumcision in Australia.[11][85] The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) estimated in 2010 that 10 to 20 percent of newborn boys are being circumcised,[86] but the prevalence of male circumcision is much higher due to the presence of older circumcised males remaining in the population.[87] Medicare Australia records show the number of males younger than six months that underwent circumcision dropped from 19,663 in 2007/08 to 6,309 (4%) in 2016/17.[88]

New Zealand edit

According to the World Health Organisation, fewer than 20% of males are circumcised in New Zealand in 2007.[11] In New Zealand routine circumcision for which there is no medical indication is uncommon and no longer publicly funded within the public hospital system.[89] In a study of men born in 1972–1973 in Dunedin, 40.2% were circumcised.[90] In a study of men born in 1977 in Christchurch, 26.1% were circumcised.[91] A 1991 survey conducted in Waikato found that 7% of male infants were circumcised.[92]

Pacific Islands edit

Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries.[89]

See also edit

References and notes edit

Notes edit

References edit

  1. ^ Yosha, Assaf; Bolnick, David; Koyle, Martin (2012). Surgical Guide to Circumcision. Springer Publishing. pp. 256–257. ISBN 978-1-4471-2858-8. It seems likely that in the near future revised recommendations, taking a more positive attitude to circumcision, are likely in many English-speaking countries. What of the future? Current medical advice and public health projects now underway seem to point to a worldwide increase in circumcision rates in the first half of the twenty-first century.
  2. ^ Staff. "Sexually transmitted infections (STIs)". World Health Organization. from the original on 11 June 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2022.
  3. ^ Leach, Penelope (2010). The Essential First Year. Dorling Kindersley Limited. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-7566-6331-5.
  4. ^ Perry, Shannon; Hockenberry, Marilyn; Cashion, Mary; Rhodes Alden, Kathryn; Olshansky, Ellen; Leonard Lowdermilk, Deitra (2022). "Nursing Care of the Newborn and Family". Maternal Child Nursing Care. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 978-0-323-82587-0. The World Health Organization recognizes male circumcision as an important intervention in reducing the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV in men.
  5. ^ Manual for early infant male circumcision under local anaesthesia (PDF). Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010. (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2022. Retrieved 31 May 2022.
  6. ^ Hay W, Levin M (25 June 2012). Current Diagnosis and Treatment Pediatrics 21/E. McGraw Hill Professional. pp. 18–19. ISBN 978-0-07-177971-5. from the original on 18 January 2016.
  7. ^ a b Ferris JA, Richters J, Pitts MK, Shelley JM, Simpson JM, Ryall R, Smith AM (April 2010). "Circumcision in Australia: further evidence on its effects on sexual health and wellbeing". Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 34 (2): 160–4. doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00501.x. PMID 23331360.
  8. ^ a b Pang MG, Kim DS (January 2002). "Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea: history and underlying causes". BJU International. 89 (1): 48–54. doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02545.x. PMID 11849160.
  9. ^ a b Introcaso, Camille E.; Xu, Fujie; Kilmarx, Peter H.; Zaidi, Akbar; Markowitz, Lauri E. (July 2013). "Prevalence of Circumcision Among Men and Boys Aged 14 to 59 Years in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005–2010". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 40 (7): 521–525. doi:10.1097/01.OLQ.0000430797.56499.0d. PMID 23965763. S2CID 31883301.
  10. ^ Homfray, Virginia; Tanton, Clare; Mitchell, Kirstin R.; Miller, Robert F.; Field, Nigel; Macdowall, Wendy; Wellings, Kaye; Sonnenberg, Pam; Johnson, Anne M.; Mercer, Catherine H. (July 2015). "Examining the association between male circumcision and sexual function". AIDS. 29 (11): 1411–1416. doi:10.1097/QAD.0000000000000745. PMC 4502984. PMID 26091302. The prevalence of male circumcision in Britain was 20.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 19.3–21.8].
  11. ^ a b c d Weiss H, Polonsky J, Bailey R, Hankins C, Halperin D, Schmid G (2007). Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety, and acceptability (PDF). Geneva: World Health Organization. p. 8. ISBN 978-92-4-159616-9. OCLC 425961131. (PDF) from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 15 January 2023.
  12. ^ "Neonatal and child male circumcision: a global review" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2010. p. 8. (PDF) from the original on 20 September 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2015.
  13. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, Hankins CA (1 March 2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14 (1): 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
  14. ^ a b c d Morris, Brian J.; Bailis, Stefan A.; Wiswell, Thomas E. (1 May 2014). "Circumcision Rates in the United States: Rising or Falling? What Effect Might the New Affirmative Pediatric Policy Statement Have?". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 89 (5): 677–686. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001. ISSN 0025-6196. PMID 24702735.
  15. ^ Hart-Cooper, G. D.; Tao, G.; Stock, J. A.; Hoover, K. W. (20 October 2014). "Circumcision of Privately Insured Males Aged 0 to 18 Years in the United States". Pediatrics. 134 (5): 950–956. doi:10.1542/peds.2014-1007. PMID 25332502. S2CID 14839564.
  16. ^ Morris, Brian J; Wamai, Richard G; Henebeng, Esther B; Tobian, Aaron AR; Klausner, Jeffrey D; Banerjee, Joya; Hankins, Catherine A (1 March 2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14: 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. ISSN 1478-7954. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
  17. ^ "Preventing HIV through safe voluntary medical male circumcision for adolescent boys and men in generalized HIV epidemics: recommendations and key considerations". www.who.int. from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
  18. ^ "Circumcision Rates in Sub-Saharan Africa Spike After Partnership with Local Religious Leaders". WCM Newsroom. from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
  19. ^ a b c Baskin, Laurence (29 April 2021). Lockwood, Charles; Wilcox, Duncan; Eckler, Kristen (eds.). "Patient education: Circumcision in baby boys (Beyond the Basics)". UpToDate. from the original on 22 November 2022. Retrieved 22 November 2022. ...this is probably an underestimate of the true incidence of circumcised males, which is likely closer to 80 percent...
  20. ^ Vardanyan, Astrik N (2013). "Reclaiming Circumcision: Armenian Stories". Genital Cutting: Protecting Children from Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements. pp. 307–315. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6407-1_20. ISBN 978-94-007-6406-4.
  21. ^ Drain PK, Halperin DT, Hughes JP, Klausner JD, Bailey RC (November 2006). "Male circumcision, religion, and infectious diseases: an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries". BMC Infectious Diseases. 6 (1): 172. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-172. PMC 1764746. PMID 17137513.
  22. ^ Wise, Jacqui (2006). "Demand for male circumcision rises in a bid to prevent HIV". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 84 (7): 509–511. PMC 2627386. PMID 16878217. As a result, there are already indications of increasing demand for male circumcision in traditionally non-circumcising societies in Southern Africa.
  23. ^ Taiwo Lawal; et al. (April 2017). "Circumcision and its effects in Africa". Translational Andrology and Urology. 6 (2): 149–157. doi:10.21037/tau.2016.12.02. PMC 5422680. PMID 28540221.
  24. ^ . National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. December 2006. Archived from the original on 9 March 2010.
  25. ^ a b Williams BG, Lloyd-Smith JO, Gouws E, Hankins C, Getz WM, Hargrove J, de Zoysa I, Dye C, Auvert B (July 2006). "The potential impact of male circumcision on HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa". PLOS Medicine. 3 (7): e262. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030262. PMC 1489185. PMID 16822094.
  26. ^ a b c d e f "Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention: insert 2" (PDF). World Health Organisation. p. 2.
  27. ^ a b c d Morris BJ, Wamai RG, Henebeng EB, Tobian AA, Klausner JD, Banerjee J, Hankins CA (4 April 2016). "Erratum to: Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14 (1): 11. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0080-6. PMC 4820865. PMID 27051352.
  28. ^ Peltzer K, Onoya D, Makonko E, Simbayi L (2014). "Prevalence and acceptability of male circumcision in South Africa". African Journal of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicines. 11 (4): 126–30. doi:10.4314/ajtcam.v11i4.19. PMC 4202407. PMID 25392591.
  29. ^ George, Clemon; Roberts, Robin; Deveaux, Lynette; Brennen, Delon F.P.; Read, Stanley E. (20 August 2019). ""Getting to Zero New HIV Infections in the Caribbean": Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Male Circumcision Among Adolescent Males in The Bahamas". American Journal of Men's Health. 13 (4): 1557988319872074. doi:10.1177/1557988319872074. ISSN 1557-9883. PMC 6704421. PMID 31431104.
  30. ^ Pando, María A.; Balan, Ivan C.; Dolezal, Curtis; Marone, Ruben; Barreda, Victoria; Carballo-Dieguez, Alex; Avila, María M. (6 June 2013). "Low frequency of male circumcision and unwillingness to be circumcised among MSM in Buenos Aires, Argentina: association with sexually transmitted infections". Journal of the International AIDS Society. 16 (1): 18500. doi:10.7448/IAS.16.1.18500. ISSN 1758-2652. PMC 3676535. PMID 23746302.
  31. ^ a b c d Castellsagué X, Peeling RW, Franceschi S, de Sanjosé S, Smith JS, Albero G, Díaz M, Herrero R, Muñoz N, Bosch FX (November 2005). "Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female partners of circumcised and uncircumcised adult men". American Journal of Epidemiology. 162 (9): 907–16. doi:10.1093/aje/kwi284. PMID 16177149.
  32. ^ Périssé, André R. S.; Schechter, Mauro; Blattner, William (1 April 2009). "Association Between Male Circumcision and Prevalent HIV Infections in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil". Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 50 (4): 435–437. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3181958591. ISSN 1525-4135. PMC 2864635. PMID 19322041.
  33. ^ Van Howe RS, Cold CJ, Lajous M, Lazcano-Ponce E, Mueller N (February 2006). "Human papillomavirus link to circumcision is misleading". Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention. 15 (2): 405, author reply 405–6. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0818. PMID 16492939. Circumcision is not usually performed by public sector health care providers in Mexico and we estimate the prevalence to be 10% to 31%, depending on the population.
  34. ^ Dávila‐Conn, Vanessa; García‐Morales, Claudia; Matías‐Florentino, Margarita; López‐Ortiz, Eduardo; Paz‐Juárez, Héctor E.; Beristain‐Barreda, Ángeles; Cárdenas‐Sandoval, Miroslava; Tapia‐Trejo, Daniela; López‐Sánchez, Dulce M.; Becerril‐Rodríguez, Manuel; García‐Esparza, Pedro; Macías‐González, Israel; Iracheta‐Hernández, Patricia; Weaver, Steven; Wertheim, Joel O. (2021). "Characteristics and growth of the genetic HIV transmission network of Mexico City during 2020". Journal of the International AIDS Society. 24 (11): e25836. doi:10.1002/jia2.25836. ISSN 1758-2652. PMC 8583431. PMID 34762774.
  35. ^ Rodriguez‐Diaz, Carlos E.; Clatts, Michael C.; Jovet‐Toledo, Gerardo G.; Vargas‐Molina, Ricardo L.; Goldsamt, Lloyd A.; García, Hermes (1 November 2012). "More than Foreskin: Circumcision Status, History of HIV/STI, and Sexual Risk in a Clinic‐Based Sample of Men in Puerto Rico". The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 9 (11): 2933–2937. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02871.x. ISSN 1743-6095. PMID 22897699. from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
  36. ^ a b c d "Data Tables — The Maternity Experiences Survey (MES) 2006–2007 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey" (PDF). Public Health Agency of Canada. p. 267. (PDF) from the original on 8 October 2009. Retrieved 29 April 2009.
  37. ^ "Newborn male circumcision | Canadian Paediatric Society". from the original on 11 April 2023. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  38. ^ "Circumcision Policy Statements". www.cirp.org. from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2016.
  39. ^ . CMAJ. 154 (6): 769–80. March 1996. PMC 1487803. PMID 8634956. Archived from the original on 23 October 2007.
  40. ^ Wirth JL (November 1980). "Current circumcision practices: Canada". Pediatrics. 66 (5): 705–8. doi:10.1542/peds.66.5.705. PMID 7432876. S2CID 35235748. from the original on 6 January 2016. Retrieved 24 April 2012.
  41. ^ Goel, V., ed. (May 1996). Patterns of Health Care in Ontario, 2nd edition (PDF). Canadian Medical Association. pp. 295. ISBN 978-0-920169-79-7.
  42. ^ Sorakan ST, Finlay JC, Jefferies AL (2015). "Newborn male circumcision". Paediatr Child Health. 20 (6): 311–5. doi:10.1093/pch/20.6.311. PMC 4578472. PMID 26435672. from the original on 30 October 2019. Retrieved 12 February 2016.
  43. ^ Rediger, Chris; Muller, Andries J. (1 February 2013). "Parents' rationale for male circumcision". Canadian Family Physician. 59 (2): e110–e115. ISSN 0008-350X. PMC 3576965. PMID 23418252. from the original on 26 October 2023. Retrieved 14 March 2023.
  44. ^ Introcaso, Camille E. (July 2013). "Prevalence of Circumcision Among Men and Boys Aged 14 to 59 Years in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005–2010". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. 40 (7): 521–525. doi:10.1097/01.OLQ.0000430797.56499.0d. PMID 23965763. S2CID 31883301.
  45. ^ Adler PW (December 2011). "Is it lawful to use Medicaid to pay for circumcision?". Journal of Law and Medicine. 19 (2): 335–53. PMID 22320007.
  46. ^ Quayle SS, Coplen DE, Austin PF (October 2003). "The effect of health care coverage on circumcision rates among newborns". The Journal of Urology. 170 (4 Pt 2): 1533–6, discussion 1536. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000091215.99513.0f. PMID 14501653.
  47. ^ Leibowitz AA, Desmond K, Belin T (January 2009). "Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States". American Journal of Public Health. 99 (1): 138–45. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.134403. PMC 2636604. PMID 19008503. The mean mewborn male circumcision rate was 55.9%. When we controlled for other factors, hospitals in states in which Medicaid covers routine male circumcision had circumcision rates that were 24 percentage points higher than did hospitals in states without such coverage (P < .001).
  48. ^ Morris BJ, Bailis SA, Wiswell TE (May 2014). "Circumcision rates in the United States: rising or falling? What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have?". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 89 (5): 677–86. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.01.001. PMID 24702735.
  49. ^ Waskett, Jake H. (August 2007). "Hospital Discharge Data Underestimate Circumcision Rates". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 34 (8): 624. doi:10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3180de2120. ISSN 0148-5717. PMID 17667534. from the original on 27 November 2022. Retrieved 16 December 2022. Researchers should be aware that infant circumcision rates [in the United States] are likely to be significantly higher than hospital discharge data might suggest.
  50. ^ Fairbanks-Rossi, Lisa. "Fretting over Foreskin". Inlander. from the original on 4 October 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2021.
  51. ^ Pfuntner A., Wier L.M., Stocks C. Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U.S. Hospitals, 2011. HCUP Statistical Brief No. 165. October 2013. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. [1] 24 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
  52. ^ . 1999 AMA Interim Meeting: Summaries and Recommendations of Council on Scientific Affairs Reports. American Medical Association. December 1999. p. 17. Archived from the original on 5 July 2007. Retrieved 13 June 2006.
  53. ^ Brown MS, Brown CA (1987). "Circumcision decision: prominence of social concerns". Pediatrics. 60 (2): 215–9. doi:10.1542/peds.80.2.215. PMID 3615091. S2CID 245205819. from the original on 18 August 2012. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
  54. ^ a b "An Outpatient Observation of the Foreskin Among Chinese Children in Hong Kong" (PDF). Singapore Medical Journal. 24 (2). April 1982. (PDF) from the original on 24 June 2018. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
  55. ^ "National Family Health Survey". rchiips.org. from the original on 3 October 2021. Retrieved 15 March 2023.
  56. ^ Wang, Zixin; Lau, Joseph T. F.; Gu, Jing (2012). "Acceptability of circumcision among clients of female sex worker in Hong Kong". AIDS and Behavior. 16 (7): 1836–1845. doi:10.1007/s10461-011-0088-7. ISSN 1573-3254. PMID 22080385. S2CID 23556728.
  57. ^ Chen, Chia Hung; Cheng, Wei-Ming; Fan, Yu-Hua; Chang, Tung-Ping (9 February 2023). "Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan". Scientific Reports. 13 (1): 2313. Bibcode:2023NatSR..13.2313C. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20140-8. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 9911792. PMID 36759665. S2CID 256667132.
  58. ^ a b c d Kim D, Koo SA, Pang MG (December 2012). "Decline in male circumcision in South Korea". BMC Public Health. 12: 1067. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-1067. PMC 3526493. PMID 23227923.
  59. ^ Ku JH, Kim ME, Lee NK, Park YH (February 2003). "Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea: community based survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 79 (1): 65–7. doi:10.1136/sti.79.1.65. PMC 1744613. PMID 12576619.
  60. ^ Or, Meital Yasur-Beit (November 2006). "Israel teaches WHO about circumcision". Ynetnews. ynet news. from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2007.
  61. ^ Darby R (August 2011). "Routine peripubertal circumcision?". CMAJ. 183 (11): 1283–4. doi:10.1503/cmaj.111-2060. PMC 3153524. PMID 21825054.
  62. ^ Ong, Christine (29 May 2008). . Channel News Asia. MediaCorp. Archived from the original on 4 January 2011. Retrieved 27 August 2012.
  63. ^ a b Kamtsiuris P, Bergmann E, Rattay P, Schlaud M (2007). "[Use of medical services. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)]" [Use of medical services. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz (in German). 50 (5–6): 836–50. doi:10.1007/s00103-007-0247-1. PMID 17514470. S2CID 29786579.
  64. ^ a b Dave SS, Fenton KA, Mercer CH, Erens B, Wellings K, Johnson AM (December 2003). "Male circumcision in Britain: findings from a national probability sample survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 79 (6): 499–500. doi:10.1136/sti.79.6.499. PMC 1744763. PMID 14663134.
  65. ^ Scholz, Benjamin. "jungsfragen – Niemand geht dumm ins Bett!". jungsfragen.de (in German). from the original on 14 March 2023. Retrieved 1 March 2023.
  66. ^ Rickwood AM, Kenny SE, Donnell SC (September 2000). "Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys: survey of trends in practice". BMJ. 321 (7264): 792–3. doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7264.792. PMC 27490. PMID 11009516.
  67. ^ Alberts, C. J.; Michel, A.; Bruisten, S.; Snijder, M. B.; Prins, M.; Waterboer, T.; Schim van der Loeff, M. F. (1 June 2017). "High-risk human papillomavirus seroprevalence in men and women of six different ethnicities in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: The HELIUS study". Papillomavirus Research. 3: 57–65. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2017.01.003. ISSN 2405-8521. PMC 5883189. PMID 28720457.
  68. ^ Van Bilsen, Ward P.H.; Kovaleva, Alexandra; Bleeker, Maaike C.G.; King, Audrey J.; Bruisten, Sylvia M.; Brokking, Wilma; De Vries, Henry J.C.; Meijer, Chris J.L.M.; Schim Van Der Loeff, Maarten F. (2019). "HPV infections and flat penile lesions of the penis in men who have sex with men". Papillomavirus Research. 8: 100173. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100173. PMC 6595232. PMID 31226447.
  69. ^ Telephone survey of the TNS Sofres Institute (commissioned by Manix), 2008 8 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
  70. ^ Örtqvist, L.; Fossum, M.; Andersson, M.; Nordenström, A.; Frisén, L.; Holmdahl, G.; Nordenskjöld, A. (2017). "Sexuality and fertility in men with hypospadias; improved outcome". Andrology. 5 (2): 286–293. doi:10.1111/andr.12309. ISSN 2047-2927. PMID 27992969. S2CID 207012229.
  71. ^ Frisch M, Friis S, Kjaer SK, Melbye M (December 1995). "Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population (Denmark 1943–90)". BMJ. 311 (7018): 1471. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7018.1471. PMC 2543732. PMID 8520335.
  72. ^ name. "Projekt SEXUS". www.projektsexus.dk (in Danish). from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
  73. ^ Ganczak, Maria (20 October 2017). "Polish medical students' attitudes regarding male circumcision as a strategy to HIV prevention". European Journal of Public Health. 27 (3). doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx189.036.
  74. ^ Klavs I, Hamers FF (February 2008). "Male circumcision in Slovenia: results from a national probability sample survey". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 84 (1): 49–50. doi:10.1136/sti.2007.027524. PMID 17881413. S2CID 24535897.
  75. ^ Maija K, Taskinen S. "Esinahan kirurgia" (PDF). (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  76. ^ a b Bronselaer, Guy A.; Schober, Justine M.; Meyer-Bahlburg, Heino F.L.; T'Sjoen, Guy; Vlietinck, Robert; Hoebeke, Piet B. (2013). "Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort: Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity". BJU International. 111 (5): 820–827. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x. PMID 23374102. S2CID 25379775. from the original on 24 February 2020. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
  77. ^ a b Claeys, Wietse; Bronselaer, Guy; Lumen, Nicolaas; Hoebeke, Piet; Spinoit, Anne‐Françoise (2023). "The self‐assessment of genital anatomy, sexual function, and genital sensation (SAGASF‐M) questionnaire in a Belgian Dutch‐speaking male population: A validating study". Andrology. 11 (3): 489–500. doi:10.1111/andr.13348. ISSN 2047-2919. PMID 36426587. S2CID 253880096. from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
  78. ^ (PDF). Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017–18. Institute of Statistics (Albania). p. 247. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 January 2019.
  79. ^ Morris, Brian J.; Wamai, Richard G.; Henebeng, Esther B.; Tobian, Aaron AR; Klausner, Jeffrey D.; Banerjee, Joya; Hankins, Catherine A. (2016). "Estimation of country-specific and global prevalence of male circumcision". Population Health Metrics. 14: 4. doi:10.1186/s12963-016-0073-5. PMC 4772313. PMID 26933388.
  80. ^ "12.10 Male Circumcision" (PDF). Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2008–09. March 2010. p. 203. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  81. ^ Institute of Statistics, Institute of Public Health, and ICF. 2018. Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017-18. Tirana, Albania: Institute of Statistics, Institute of Public Health, and ICF. (2017–2018). "Albania DHS, 2017-18 - Final Report (English)". from the original on 4 June 2023. Retrieved 8 June 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  82. ^ "Trends in pediatric circumcision in Belgium and the Brussels University Hospital from 1994 to 2012 | Scriptieprijs". scriptiebank.be. from the original on 13 March 2023. Retrieved 13 March 2023.
  83. ^ "Incidence and prevalence of circumcision in Australia". Circumcision Information Australia. January 2013. from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
  84. ^ Smith AM, Pitts MK, Shelley JM, Richters J, Ferris J (July 2007). "The Australian longitudinal study of health and relationships". BMC Public Health. 7: 139. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-139. PMC 1931435. PMID 17608953.
  85. ^ Richters J, Smith AM, de Visser RO, Grulich AE, Rissel CE (August 2006). "Circumcision in Australia: prevalence and effects on sexual health". International Journal of STD & AIDS. 17 (8): 547–54. doi:10.1258/095646206778145730. PMID 16925903. S2CID 24396989.
  86. ^ . Royal Australasian College of Physicians. September 2010. Archived from the original on 10 February 2013. Retrieved 24 May 2021.
  87. ^ The incidence of circumcision in Australia was very high until 1971 when it started a steep decline. Consequently, circumcised males tend to be older.
  88. ^ Rashida Yosufzai (19 February 2018). "Why is the number of male circumcisions declining in Australia?". SBS News. from the original on 30 April 2019. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
  89. ^ a b Afsari M, Beasley SW, Maoate K, Heckert K (March 2002). "Attitudes of Pacific parents to circumcision of boys". Pacific Health Dialog. 9 (1): 29–33. PMID 12737414. Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries.
  90. ^ Dickson N, van Roode T, Paul C (August 2005). "Herpes simplex virus type 2 status at age 26 is not related to early circumcision in a birth cohort". Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 32 (8): 517–9. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000161296.58095.ab. PMID 16041257. S2CID 34088021.
  91. ^ Fergusson DM, Boden JM, Horwood LJ (November 2006). "Circumcision status and risk of sexually transmitted infection in young adult males: an analysis of a longitudinal birth cohort". Pediatrics. 118 (5): 1971–7. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1175. PMID 17079568. S2CID 72751030.
  92. ^ Lawrenson RA (May 1991). "Current practice of neonatal circumcision in the Waikato". The New Zealand Medical Journal. 104 (911): 184–5. PMID 1898442.

prevalence, circumcision, confused, with, prevalence, female, circumcision, prevalence, circumcision, percentage, males, given, population, have, been, circumcised, with, procedure, most, commonly, being, performed, part, preventive, healthcare, religious, obl. Not to be confused with prevalence of female circumcision The prevalence of circumcision is the percentage of males in a given population who have been circumcised with the procedure most commonly being performed as a part of preventive healthcare a religious obligation or cultural practice Yosha amp Bolnick amp Koyle 2012 states that circumcision rates are likely to increase during the first half of the twenty first century 1 Map of circumcision prevalence based on a 2007 WHO report Widespread near universal gt 80 prevalence Widespread common 20 80 prevalence Uncommon lt 20 prevalence N ASince 2010 both the World Health Organization and Joint United Nations Programme on HIV AIDS have been promoting a higher rate of circumcision prevalence as a prevention against HIV transmission and some STIs in areas with high HIV transmission and low circumcision rates 2 3 4 5 According to Hay amp Levin 2012 around 50 of all circumcisions worldwide are performed for reasons of preventive healthcare while the other 50 are predominately performed for religious or cultural reasons 6 Contents 1 Overview 1 1 Present 2 Africa 2 1 Less than 20 2 2 Between 20 and 80 2 2 1 South Africa 2 3 More than 80 3 Americas 3 1 Less than 20 3 1 1 The Bahamas 3 1 2 Argentina 3 1 3 Brazil 3 1 4 Colombia 3 2 Between 20 and 80 3 2 1 Mexico 3 2 2 Puerto Rico 3 2 3 Canada 3 3 Over 80 3 3 1 United States 4 Asia 4 1 Less than 20 4 1 1 India 4 1 2 China 4 1 3 Hong Kong 4 1 4 Singapore 4 1 5 Taiwan 4 1 6 Cambodia 4 2 Between 20 and 80 4 2 1 South Korea 4 3 More than 80 5 Europe 5 1 Less than 20 5 1 1 Germany 10 9 18 8 5 1 2 United Kingdom 15 8 5 1 3 The Netherlands 9 16 5 1 4 France 14 5 1 5 Bulgaria 13 4 5 1 6 Russia 11 8 5 1 7 Sweden 11 8 5 1 8 Denmark 1 6 7 5 1 9 Spain 6 6 5 1 10 Poland 5 5 1 11 Slovenia 8 5 5 1 12 Finland 2 4 5 1 13 Croatia 1 34 5 2 Between 20 and 80 5 2 1 Bosnia Herzegovina 58 7 or 41 6 5 2 2 Albania 36 8 or 47 7 5 2 3 Belgium 22 5 3 Over 80 6 Oceania 6 1 Australia 6 2 New Zealand 6 3 Pacific Islands 7 See also 8 References and notes 8 1 Notes 8 2 ReferencesOverview editPresent edit Rates vary widely from over 90 in Israel and many Muslim majority countries 86 3 in South Korea to 80 in the United States to 58 in Australia to 45 in South Africa to 20 7 in the United Kingdom to under 1 in Japan and Honduras 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 In 2016 the global prevalence of circumcision was estimated to be around 38 with notable increases of circumcision prevalence seen in the United States the Middle East and Africa major medical organizations have promoted a higher rate of circumcision in Africa as a preventive against the spread of HIV AIDS 14 16 In 2020 the World Health Organization reiterated that it is an efficacious prophylactic intervention if carried out by medical professionals under safe conditions in areas of high HIV AIDS prevalence 17 18 Between 2008 and 2010 circumcision prevalence and incidence in the United States were estimated to be around 80 Wolters Kluwer estimated that closer to 80 of males in 2021 were circumcised 19 9 The continent of Africa similarly has widely adopted the practice as a preventive measure against the spread of HIV While it has overwhelming prevalence in the Muslim world and in Israel due to the religious beliefs of most Muslims and Jews however some non Muslim groups living within Muslim majority countries such as Armenians and Assyrians do not practice it 20 It is prevalent in some Muslim majority countries in southeast Asia such as Indonesia and Malaysia however the WHO states that there is little non religious circumcision in Asia with the exceptions of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines 11 In parts of Africa it is often practiced as part of tribal customs from Christians Muslims and Animists In contrast rates are much lower in most of Europe parts of southern Africa most of Asia Oceania and Latin America constituting South America Central America the Caribbean and Mexico 21 Australia Canada Ireland New Zealand and the United Kingdom are examples of countries that have seen a decline in male circumcision in recent decades while there have been indications of increasing demand in southern Africa partly for preventive reasons due to the HIV epidemic there 22 Africa editStudies suggest that about 62 of African males are circumcised 23 However the rate varies widely between different regions and among ethnic and religious groups with Muslim North Africans practising it for religious reasons central Africans as part of ethnic rituals or local custom and some traditionally non circumcising populations in the South recently adopting the practice due to measures by the World Health Organisation to prevent AIDS 24 Williams B G et al commented that Most of the currently available data on the prevalence of male circumcision are several decades old while several of the recent studies were carried out as adjuncts to demographic and health surveys and were not designed to determine the prevalence of male circumcision 25 Prevalence of circumcision in Africa Country WHO 2006 26 Williams et al 2006 25 Morris et al 2016 13 27 nbsp Angola gt 80 66 57 5 nbsp Central African Republic 20 80 67 63 nbsp Chad gt 80 64 73 5 nbsp Republic of the Congo gt 80 70 70 nbsp Democratic Republic of the Congo gt 80 70 97 2 nbsp Gabon gt 80 93 99 2 nbsp Burundi lt 20 2 61 7 nbsp Djibouti gt 80 94 96 5 nbsp Eritrea gt 80 95 97 2 nbsp Ethiopia gt 80 76 92 2 nbsp Kenya gt 80 84 91 2 nbsp Rwanda lt 20 10 13 3 nbsp Somalia gt 80 93 93 5 nbsp Sudan 20 80 47 39 4 nbsp Tanzania 20 80 70 72 nbsp Uganda 20 80 25 26 7 nbsp Botswana lt 20 25 15 1 nbsp Lesotho 20 80 0 52 nbsp Malawi lt 20 17 21 6 nbsp Mozambique 20 80 56 47 4 nbsp Namibia lt 20 15 25 5 nbsp South Africa 20 80 35 44 7 nbsp Eswatini lt 20 50 8 2 nbsp Zambia lt 20 12 21 6 nbsp Zimbabwe lt 20 10 9 2 nbsp Benin gt 80 84 92 9 nbsp Burkina Faso gt 80 89 88 3 nbsp Cameroon gt 80 93 94 nbsp Equatorial Guinea gt 80 86 87 nbsp Gambia gt 80 90 94 5 nbsp Ghana gt 80 95 91 6 nbsp Guinea gt 80 83 84 2 nbsp Guinea Bissau gt 80 91 93 3 nbsp Cote d Ivoire 20 80 93 96 7 nbsp Liberia gt 80 70 97 7 nbsp Mali gt 80 95 86 nbsp Mauritania gt 80 78 99 2 nbsp Niger gt 80 92 95 5 nbsp Nigeria gt 80 81 98 9 nbsp Senegal gt 80 89 93 5 nbsp Sierra Leone gt 80 90 96 1 nbsp Togo gt 80 93 95 2 Less than 20 edit Botswana Rwanda Eswatini Zimbabwe 13 27 Between 20 and 80 edit Angola Burundi Central African Republic Chad Congo Rep Lesotho Malawi Mozambique Namibia South Africa Sudan Tanzania Uganda Zambia 13 27 South Africa edit It is estimated that 48 7 of males are circumcised in South Africa 13 One national study reported that 54 2 of black Africans were circumcised with 32 1 of those traditionally circumcised and 13 4 circumcised for medical reasons 28 More than 80 edit Benin Burkina Faso Cameroon Congo Dem Rep Cote d Ivoire Djibouti Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Ethiopia Gabon Gambia Ghana Guinea Guinea Bissau Kenya Liberia Mali Mauritania Niger Nigeria Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia Togo 13 27 Americas editLess than 20 edit Less than 20 of the population are circumcised in Argentina Belize Bolivia Brazil Chile Colombia Costa Rica Cuba Dominican Republic El Salvador Ecuador French Guiana Guatemala Guyana Haiti Honduras Jamaica Nicaragua Panama Paraguay Peru Saint Lucia The Bahamas Trinidad and Tobago Uruguay Venezuela 26 The Bahamas edit The reported circumcision rate for younger individuals age 15 18 is 16 7 2019 29 Argentina edit The circumcision rate among homosexual men in Buenos Aires is reported to be 13 2013 30 Brazil edit The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6 9 31 The reported rate is 13 in Rio de Janeiro indicating possible differences between urban and rural rates 32 Colombia edit The overall prevalence of circumcision is reported to be 6 9 31 Between 20 and 80 edit Mexico edit In 2006 the prevalence of circumcision in Mexico was estimated to be 10 to 31 33 A recent 2020 HIV study conducted in Mexico City found a participant circumcision rate of 23 255 1118 34 Puerto Rico edit In 2012 a random sample of male visitors to a STI center in San Juan were surveyed on various topics the reported circumcision rate was 32 4 35 Canada edit nbsp Rate of neonatal circumcision by province according to the Maternity Experiences Survey in 2006 2007 36 Circumcision in Canada followed the pattern of other English speaking countries with the practice being adopted during the 1900s on hygienic grounds but with the rate of circumcision declining in the latter part of the 20th century particularly after a new policy position was released in 1975 37 38 The Canadian Paediatric Society estimated that in 1970 48 percent of males were circumcised 39 However studies conducted in 1977 1978 revealed a wide variation in the incidence of circumcision between different provinces and territories For example Yukon reported a rate of 74 8 percent while Newfoundland reported an incidence of 1 9 to 2 4 percent 40 The rate continued to drop with the newborn circumcision rate in Ontario in 1994 95 dropping to 29 9 41 A survey of Canadian maternity practices conducted in 2006 2007 and published in 2009 by the national public health agency found a newborn circumcision rate of 31 9 36 Rates varied markedly across the country from close to zero in Newfoundland and Labrador to 44 3 in Alberta and 43 7 in Ontario In 2015 the Canadian Paediatric Society used those statistics in determining the national circumcision rate it currently quotes 36 42 A more recent survey conducted in 2011 on expecting couples in Saskatchewan average age 30 3 found the circumcision rate of the male participants to be 61 43 Table Percentage of mothers reporting having their baby circumcised by region 2006 07 36 Province Territory Province Territory Alberta 44 3 New Brunswick 18 0Ontario 43 7 Quebec 12 3Prince Edward Island 39 2 Northwest Territories 9 7Saskatchewan 35 6 Nova Scotia 6 8Canada 31 9 Newfoundland and Labrador Manitoba 31 6 Nunavut British Columbia 30 2 Yukon Numerator too small for rate calculationOver 80 edit United States edit As of 2014 an estimated 80 5 of American men are circumcised and the prevalence of the procedure is considered to be near universal in the country 14 44 The CDC has estimated the present rate of circumcision in the United States to be 81 Morris et al found a somewhat lower present incidence of 77 in 2010 During the 2000s the prevalence of circumcision in men aged 14 59 differed by race 91 percent of non Hispanic white men 76 percent of black men and 44 percent of Hispanic men of any race were circumcised according to Mayo Clinic Proceedings 14 Wolters Kluwer estimated that closer to 80 of males in 2021 were circumcised 19 Medicaid funding for infant circumcision used to be available in every state but starting with California in 1982 18 states Arizona California Colorado Florida Idaho Louisiana Maine Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nevada North Carolina North Dakota Oregon South Carolina Utah and Washington had eliminated Medicaid coverage of routine circumcision by July 2011 45 One study in the Midwest of the U S found that this had no effect on the newborn circumcision rate but it did affect the demand for circumcision at a later time 46 Another study published in early 2009 found a difference in the neonatal male circumcision rate of 24 between states with and without Medicaid coverage The study was controlled for other factors such as the percentage of Hispanic patients 47 The CDC uses two data sources to track circumcision rates The first is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey NHANES which records circumcisions performed at any time at any location The second is the National Hospital Discharge Survey NHDS which does not record circumcisions performed outside the hospital setting or those performed at any age following discharge from the birth hospitalization 48 Methodologically flawed calculations throughout the 2000s and 2010s showed the rate decreasing off of these statistics but this data is believed to be misleading due to an increasing trend of performing neonatal circumcisions outside of hospitals a trend not reflected in hospital discharge data 19 49 50 Circumcision was the second most common procedure performed on patients under one year of age after routine inoculations and prophylactic vaccinations 51 There are various explanations for why the infant circumcision rate in the United States is different from comparable countries Many parents decisions about circumcision are preconceived which may contribute to the high rate of elective circumcision 52 Brown amp Brown 1987 reported the most correlated factor is whether the father is circumcised 53 Asia editLess than 20 edit Armenia Bhutan Burma China Cambodia Hong Kong 54 India Japan Laos Mongolia Nepal North Korea Papua New Guinea Singapore Sri Lanka Taiwan Thailand Vietnam 26 India edit According to the National Family Health Survey NFHS 4 the overall circumcision rate in India is 16 55 China edit The overall prevalence of circumcision in China is reported to be 14 13 Hong Kong edit A sample of children aged lt 12 found a circumcision rate of 3 4 1982 54 A survey on men who regularly visit female sex workers from 2012 found a circumcision rate of 28 56 Singapore edit The prevalence of circumcision in Singapore is estimated to be 14 9 13 Taiwan edit It is estimated that the circumcision rate for men aged 20 40 is between 10 and 15 57 Cambodia edit The overall prevalence of circumcision in Cambodia is reported to be 3 5 31 Between 20 and 80 edit Indonesia Kazakhstan Malaysia and South Korea 58 South Korea edit Circumcision is largely a modern day phenomenon in South Korea While during the twentieth century the rate of circumcision increased to around 80 virtually no circumcision was performed prior to 1945 as it was against Korea s long and strong tradition of preserving the body as a gift from parents 58 better source needed A 2001 study of 20 year old South Korean men found that 78 were circumcised 59 At the time the authors commented that South Korea has possibly the largest absolute number of teenage or adult circumcisions anywhere in the world Because circumcision started through contact with the American military during the Korean War South Korea has an unusual history of circumcision According to a 2002 study 86 3 of South Korean males aged 14 29 were circumcised 8 In 2012 it is the case of 75 8 of the same age group Only after 1999 has some information against circumcision become available at the time of the 2012 study only 3 of Korean internet sites using the most popular Korean search engine Naver were against indiscriminate circumcision and 97 were for 58 The authors of the study speculate that the very existence of information about the history of Korean circumcision its contrary nature relative to a longstanding tradition its introduction by the US military etc has been extremely influential on the decision making process regarding circumcision 58 More than 80 edit Afghanistan Azerbaijan Bangladesh 13 Bahrain Brunei Iran Iraq Israel 60 Pakistan 13 Jordan Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lebanon Oman Palestine the Philippines 31 Qatar Saudi Arabia Syria Tajikistan Turkey Turkmenistan Uzbekistan the United Arab Emirates and Yemen 26 The overall prevalence of circumcision tuli in the Philippines is reported to be 92 5 Most circumcisions in the Philippines are performed between the ages of 11 and 13 61 62 Europe editLess than 20 edit Armenia Austria Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic Cyprus Denmark Estonia Finland France Georgia Germany 63 Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Malta Moldova The Netherlands Norway Poland Portugal Romania Russia Slovakia Slovenia Spain Serbia Sweden Switzerland Ukraine 26 and the United Kingdom 64 Germany 10 9 18 8 edit In Germany the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents found in 2007 that 10 9 of boys aged 0 17 had been circumcised 63 An online survey of 110 964 German youth aged 12 found a circumcision rate of 18 8 as of March 2023 65 The majority of the procedures 69 were performed for medical reasons while 19 were performed on religious grounds United Kingdom 15 8 edit A national survey on sexual attitudes in 2000 found that 15 8 of men or boys in the United Kingdom ages 16 44 were circumcised by their parents choosing while 11 7 of 16 to 19 year olds and 19 6 of 40 to 44 year olds said they had been circumcised Apart from black Caribbeans men born overseas were more likely to be circumcised 64 Rickwood et al reported that the proportion of English boys circumcised for medical reasons had fallen from 35 in the early 1930s to 6 5 by the mid 1980s As of 2000 update an estimated 3 8 of male children in the UK were being circumcised for medical reasons by the age of 15 66 The researchers stated that too many boys especially under the age of 5 were still being circumcised because of a misdiagnosis of phimosis They called for a target to reduce the percentage to 2 The Netherlands 9 16 edit Among participants of the HELIUS study recruited between 2011 and 2015 age 18 70 the circumcision rate for Dutch men without a migration background was 9 The rate was gt 95 for men of Moroccan Turkish or Ghanaian background 67 A small study from 2019 that recruited homosexual men suffering from various STD s found that 16 of the participants were circumcised 68 France 14 edit In France according to a telephone survey TNS Sofres Institute 2008 14 of men are circumcised 69 Bulgaria 13 4 edit The circumcision rate in Bulgaria is estimated to be 13 4 13 Russia 11 8 edit The circumcision rate in Russia is estimated to be 11 8 13 Sweden 11 8 edit A study on hypospadias in 2016 recruited a control group i e men without hypospadias via the Swedish Population Registry the reported circumcision rate of the controls was 11 8 with a mean age was 33 70 Denmark 1 6 7 edit In 1986 511 out of approximately 478 000 Danish boys aged 0 14 years were circumcised This corresponds to a cumulative national circumcision rate of around 1 6 by the age of 15 years 71 A recent survey 2017 2018 called Project SEXUS surveyed 62 675 Danes aged 15 89 years on sexual topics The survey found the male circumcision rate to be 7 Of the respondents 5 were circumcised for medical or other reasons while 2 were circumcised for religious or traditional reasons 72 Spain 6 6 edit The overall prevalence of circumcision in Spain is reported to be 6 6 13 Poland 5 edit A 2017 survey of Polish university students average age 25 found a circumcision rate of 5 73 This figure is an estimate and fully representative only for students of the university where the survey took place A 2016 study estimated a prevalence rate of 0 11 in total population 13 Slovenia 8 5 edit In Slovenia a 1999 2001 national probability sample of the general population aged 18 49 years found that overall 4 5 of Slovenian male citizens reported being circumcised Prevalence strongly varied across religious groups with 92 4 of Muslims being circumcised 1 7 of Roman Catholics 0 of other religious affiliations Evangelic Serbian Orthodox other and 7 1 of those with no religious affiliation 74 The circumcision rate was reported to be 8 5 in 2016 13 Finland 2 4 edit In Finland the overall prevalence of circumcision is 2 4 according to a recent publication by the Finnish Health Ministry 75 Croatia 1 34 edit A 2016 report found that the circumcision rate in Croatia was 1 34 13 Between 20 and 80 edit nbsp Circumcision rate by region in Albania for males aged 15 49 2017 2018Belgium 76 77 Albania Kosovo North Macedonia and Bosnia and Herzegovina 26 Bosnia Herzegovina 58 7 or 41 6 edit In Bosnia Herzegovina the circumcision rate was 58 7 in 2018 78 This study shows shows 41 6 of circumcision rate in Bosnia Herzegovina 79 Albania 36 8 or 47 7 edit In Albania during the years 2008 09 the percentage of men age 15 49 who reported having been circumcised was 47 7 80 In the years 2017 18 the circumcision rate in Albania had declined to 36 8 81 Belgium 22 edit A study on genital sensitivity from 2013 recruited 1400 adult men through leaflets randomly distributed at railway stations in Belgium In this study 22 6 of the participants reported being circumcised 76 The majority identified as being Caucasian with only a very small minority reporting being Asian Arabic or African In another more recent 2023 and similarly designed study on genital sensitivity 21 7 152 out of 702 of participants reported being circumcised 77 According to data from the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance NIHDI or RIZIV the number of circumcisions performed in Belgium amounted to 25 286 in the year of 2011 The vast majority of the procedures were performed on individuals aged lt 16 years old If this rate remains stable it is estimated that over time the circumcision rate for boys aged 16 will reach 31 71 82 Over 80 edit Kosovo 91 7 Azerbaijan 98 5 and Turkey 98 6 13 Oceania editAustralia edit Circumcision reached its peak in Australia in the 1950s with a rate of more than 80 but has steadily fallen to an estimated 26 in 2012 The rate of circumcision has dropped rapidly over the years It is estimated that roughly 80 percent of males 35 and under are not circumcised 83 The Australian Longitudinal Study of Health and Relationships is a computer assisted telephone interview of males aged 16 64 that uses a nationally representative population sample 84 In 2005 the interview found that the prevalence of circumcision in Australia was roughly 58 Circumcision status was more common with males over 30 than males under 30 and more common with males who were born in Australia 66 of males born in Australia were circumcised and less than 1 3 of males under 30 were circumcised 7 There has been a decline in the rate of infant circumcision in Australia 11 85 The Royal Australasian College of Physicians RACP estimated in 2010 that 10 to 20 percent of newborn boys are being circumcised 86 but the prevalence of male circumcision is much higher due to the presence of older circumcised males remaining in the population 87 Medicare Australia records show the number of males younger than six months that underwent circumcision dropped from 19 663 in 2007 08 to 6 309 4 in 2016 17 88 New Zealand edit According to the World Health Organisation fewer than 20 of males are circumcised in New Zealand in 2007 11 In New Zealand routine circumcision for which there is no medical indication is uncommon and no longer publicly funded within the public hospital system 89 In a study of men born in 1972 1973 in Dunedin 40 2 were circumcised 90 In a study of men born in 1977 in Christchurch 26 1 were circumcised 91 A 1991 survey conducted in Waikato found that 7 of male infants were circumcised 92 Pacific Islands edit Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries 89 See also editGenital modification and mutilationReferences and notes editNotes edit References edit Yosha Assaf Bolnick David Koyle Martin 2012 Surgical Guide to Circumcision Springer Publishing pp 256 257 ISBN 978 1 4471 2858 8 It seems likely that in the near future revised recommendations taking a more positive attitude to circumcision are likely in many English speaking countries What of the future Current medical advice and public health projects now underway seem to point to a worldwide increase in circumcision rates in the first half of the twenty first century Staff Sexually transmitted infections STIs World Health Organization Archived from the original on 11 June 2023 Retrieved 24 December 2022 Leach Penelope 2010 The Essential First Year Dorling Kindersley Limited p 30 ISBN 978 0 7566 6331 5 Perry Shannon Hockenberry Marilyn Cashion Mary Rhodes Alden Kathryn Olshansky Ellen Leonard Lowdermilk Deitra 2022 Nursing Care of the Newborn and Family Maternal Child Nursing Care Elsevier Health Sciences ISBN 978 0 323 82587 0 The World Health Organization recognizes male circumcision as an important intervention in reducing the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV in men Manual for early infant male circumcision under local anaesthesia PDF Geneva World Health Organization 2010 Archived PDF from the original on 23 April 2022 Retrieved 31 May 2022 Hay W Levin M 25 June 2012 Current Diagnosis and Treatment Pediatrics 21 E McGraw Hill Professional pp 18 19 ISBN 978 0 07 177971 5 Archived from the original on 18 January 2016 a b Ferris JA Richters J Pitts MK Shelley JM Simpson JM Ryall R Smith AM April 2010 Circumcision in Australia further evidence on its effects on sexual health and wellbeing Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 34 2 160 4 doi 10 1111 j 1753 6405 2010 00501 x PMID 23331360 a b Pang MG Kim DS January 2002 Extraordinarily high rates of male circumcision in South Korea history and underlying causes BJU International 89 1 48 54 doi 10 1046 j 1464 410x 2002 02545 x PMID 11849160 a b Introcaso Camille E Xu Fujie Kilmarx Peter H Zaidi Akbar Markowitz Lauri E July 2013 Prevalence of Circumcision Among Men and Boys Aged 14 to 59 Years in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005 2010 Sexually Transmitted Diseases 40 7 521 525 doi 10 1097 01 OLQ 0000430797 56499 0d PMID 23965763 S2CID 31883301 Homfray Virginia Tanton Clare Mitchell Kirstin R Miller Robert F Field Nigel Macdowall Wendy Wellings Kaye Sonnenberg Pam Johnson Anne M Mercer Catherine H July 2015 Examining the association between male circumcision and sexual function AIDS 29 11 1411 1416 doi 10 1097 QAD 0000000000000745 PMC 4502984 PMID 26091302 The prevalence of male circumcision in Britain was 20 7 95 confidence interval CI 19 3 21 8 a b c d Weiss H Polonsky J Bailey R Hankins C Halperin D Schmid G 2007 Male circumcision global trends and determinants of prevalence safety and acceptability PDF Geneva World Health Organization p 8 ISBN 978 92 4 159616 9 OCLC 425961131 Archived PDF from the original on 15 July 2015 Retrieved 15 January 2023 Neonatal and child male circumcision a global review PDF World Health Organization 2010 p 8 Archived PDF from the original on 20 September 2018 Retrieved 12 April 2015 a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Morris BJ Wamai RG Henebeng EB Tobian AA Klausner JD Banerjee J Hankins CA 1 March 2016 Estimation of country specific and global prevalence of male circumcision Population Health Metrics 14 1 4 doi 10 1186 s12963 016 0073 5 PMC 4772313 PMID 26933388 a b c d Morris Brian J Bailis Stefan A Wiswell Thomas E 1 May 2014 Circumcision Rates in the United States Rising or Falling What Effect Might the New Affirmative Pediatric Policy Statement Have Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89 5 677 686 doi 10 1016 j mayocp 2014 01 001 ISSN 0025 6196 PMID 24702735 Hart Cooper G D Tao G Stock J A Hoover K W 20 October 2014 Circumcision of Privately Insured Males Aged 0 to 18 Years in the United States Pediatrics 134 5 950 956 doi 10 1542 peds 2014 1007 PMID 25332502 S2CID 14839564 Morris Brian J Wamai Richard G Henebeng Esther B Tobian Aaron AR Klausner Jeffrey D Banerjee Joya Hankins Catherine A 1 March 2016 Estimation of country specific and global prevalence of male circumcision Population Health Metrics 14 4 doi 10 1186 s12963 016 0073 5 ISSN 1478 7954 PMC 4772313 PMID 26933388 Preventing HIV through safe voluntary medical male circumcision for adolescent boys and men in generalized HIV epidemics recommendations and key considerations www who int Archived from the original on 3 October 2021 Retrieved 3 October 2021 Circumcision Rates in Sub Saharan Africa Spike After Partnership with Local Religious Leaders WCM Newsroom Archived from the original on 3 October 2021 Retrieved 3 October 2021 a b c Baskin Laurence 29 April 2021 Lockwood Charles Wilcox Duncan Eckler Kristen eds Patient education Circumcision in baby boys Beyond the Basics UpToDate Archived from the original on 22 November 2022 Retrieved 22 November 2022 this is probably an underestimate of the true incidence of circumcised males which is likely closer to 80 percent Vardanyan Astrik N 2013 Reclaiming Circumcision Armenian Stories Genital Cutting Protecting Children from Medical Cultural and Religious Infringements pp 307 315 doi 10 1007 978 94 007 6407 1 20 ISBN 978 94 007 6406 4 Drain PK Halperin DT Hughes JP Klausner JD Bailey RC November 2006 Male circumcision religion and infectious diseases an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries BMC Infectious Diseases 6 1 172 doi 10 1186 1471 2334 6 172 PMC 1764746 PMID 17137513 Wise Jacqui 2006 Demand for male circumcision rises in a bid to prevent HIV Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84 7 509 511 PMC 2627386 PMID 16878217 As a result there are already indications of increasing demand for male circumcision in traditionally non circumcising societies in Southern Africa Taiwo Lawal et al April 2017 Circumcision and its effects in Africa Translational Andrology and Urology 6 2 149 157 doi 10 21037 tau 2016 12 02 PMC 5422680 PMID 28540221 Questions and answers NIAID sponsored adult male circumcision trials in Kenya and Uganda National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases December 2006 Archived from the original on 9 March 2010 a b Williams BG Lloyd Smith JO Gouws E Hankins C Getz WM Hargrove J de Zoysa I Dye C Auvert B July 2006 The potential impact of male circumcision on HIV in Sub Saharan Africa PLOS Medicine 3 7 e262 doi 10 1371 journal pmed 0030262 PMC 1489185 PMID 16822094 a b c d e f Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention insert 2 PDF World Health Organisation p 2 a b c d Morris BJ Wamai RG Henebeng EB Tobian AA Klausner JD Banerjee J Hankins CA 4 April 2016 Erratum to Estimation of country specific and global prevalence of male circumcision Population Health Metrics 14 1 11 doi 10 1186 s12963 016 0080 6 PMC 4820865 PMID 27051352 Peltzer K Onoya D Makonko E Simbayi L 2014 Prevalence and acceptability of male circumcision in South Africa African Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines 11 4 126 30 doi 10 4314 ajtcam v11i4 19 PMC 4202407 PMID 25392591 George Clemon Roberts Robin Deveaux Lynette Brennen Delon F P Read Stanley E 20 August 2019 Getting to Zero New HIV Infections in the Caribbean Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Male Circumcision Among Adolescent Males in The Bahamas American Journal of Men s Health 13 4 1557988319872074 doi 10 1177 1557988319872074 ISSN 1557 9883 PMC 6704421 PMID 31431104 Pando Maria A Balan Ivan C Dolezal Curtis Marone Ruben Barreda Victoria Carballo Dieguez Alex Avila Maria M 6 June 2013 Low frequency of male circumcision and unwillingness to be circumcised among MSM in Buenos Aires Argentina association with sexually transmitted infections Journal of the International AIDS Society 16 1 18500 doi 10 7448 IAS 16 1 18500 ISSN 1758 2652 PMC 3676535 PMID 23746302 a b c d Castellsague X Peeling RW Franceschi S de Sanjose S Smith JS Albero G Diaz M Herrero R Munoz N Bosch FX November 2005 Chlamydia trachomatis infection in female partners of circumcised and uncircumcised adult men American Journal of Epidemiology 162 9 907 16 doi 10 1093 aje kwi284 PMID 16177149 Perisse Andre R S Schechter Mauro Blattner William 1 April 2009 Association Between Male Circumcision and Prevalent HIV Infections in Rio de Janeiro Brazil Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 50 4 435 437 doi 10 1097 QAI 0b013e3181958591 ISSN 1525 4135 PMC 2864635 PMID 19322041 Van Howe RS Cold CJ Lajous M Lazcano Ponce E Mueller N February 2006 Human papillomavirus link to circumcision is misleading Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers amp Prevention 15 2 405 author reply 405 6 doi 10 1158 1055 9965 EPI 05 0818 PMID 16492939 Circumcision is not usually performed by public sector health care providers in Mexico and we estimate the prevalence to be 10 to 31 depending on the population Davila Conn Vanessa Garcia Morales Claudia Matias Florentino Margarita Lopez Ortiz Eduardo Paz Juarez Hector E Beristain Barreda Angeles Cardenas Sandoval Miroslava Tapia Trejo Daniela Lopez Sanchez Dulce M Becerril Rodriguez Manuel Garcia Esparza Pedro Macias Gonzalez Israel Iracheta Hernandez Patricia Weaver Steven Wertheim Joel O 2021 Characteristics and growth of the genetic HIV transmission network of Mexico City during 2020 Journal of the International AIDS Society 24 11 e25836 doi 10 1002 jia2 25836 ISSN 1758 2652 PMC 8583431 PMID 34762774 Rodriguez Diaz Carlos E Clatts Michael C Jovet Toledo Gerardo G Vargas Molina Ricardo L Goldsamt Lloyd A Garcia Hermes 1 November 2012 More than Foreskin Circumcision Status History of HIV STI and Sexual Risk in a Clinic Based Sample of Men in Puerto Rico The Journal of Sexual Medicine 9 11 2933 2937 doi 10 1111 j 1743 6109 2012 02871 x ISSN 1743 6095 PMID 22897699 Archived from the original on 26 October 2023 Retrieved 15 March 2023 a b c d Data Tables The Maternity Experiences Survey MES 2006 2007 Canadian Maternity Experiences Survey PDF Public Health Agency of Canada p 267 Archived PDF from the original on 8 October 2009 Retrieved 29 April 2009 Newborn male circumcision Canadian Paediatric Society Archived from the original on 11 April 2023 Retrieved 9 September 2023 Circumcision Policy Statements www cirp org Archived from the original on 9 February 2019 Retrieved 28 July 2016 Neonatal circumcision revisited Fetus and Newborn Committee Canadian Paediatric Society CMAJ 154 6 769 80 March 1996 PMC 1487803 PMID 8634956 Archived from the original on 23 October 2007 Wirth JL November 1980 Current circumcision practices Canada Pediatrics 66 5 705 8 doi 10 1542 peds 66 5 705 PMID 7432876 S2CID 35235748 Archived from the original on 6 January 2016 Retrieved 24 April 2012 Goel V ed May 1996 Patterns of Health Care in Ontario 2nd edition PDF Canadian Medical Association pp 295 ISBN 978 0 920169 79 7 Sorakan ST Finlay JC Jefferies AL 2015 Newborn male circumcision Paediatr Child Health 20 6 311 5 doi 10 1093 pch 20 6 311 PMC 4578472 PMID 26435672 Archived from the original on 30 October 2019 Retrieved 12 February 2016 Rediger Chris Muller Andries J 1 February 2013 Parents rationale for male circumcision Canadian Family Physician 59 2 e110 e115 ISSN 0008 350X PMC 3576965 PMID 23418252 Archived from the original on 26 October 2023 Retrieved 14 March 2023 Introcaso Camille E July 2013 Prevalence of Circumcision Among Men and Boys Aged 14 to 59 Years in the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2005 2010 Sexually Transmitted Diseases American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association 40 7 521 525 doi 10 1097 01 OLQ 0000430797 56499 0d PMID 23965763 S2CID 31883301 Adler PW December 2011 Is it lawful to use Medicaid to pay for circumcision Journal of Law and Medicine 19 2 335 53 PMID 22320007 Quayle SS Coplen DE Austin PF October 2003 The effect of health care coverage on circumcision rates among newborns The Journal of Urology 170 4 Pt 2 1533 6 discussion 1536 doi 10 1097 01 ju 0000091215 99513 0f PMID 14501653 Leibowitz AA Desmond K Belin T January 2009 Determinants and policy implications of male circumcision in the United States American Journal of Public Health 99 1 138 45 doi 10 2105 AJPH 2008 134403 PMC 2636604 PMID 19008503 The mean mewborn male circumcision rate was 55 9 When we controlled for other factors hospitals in states in which Medicaid covers routine male circumcision had circumcision rates that were 24 percentage points higher than did hospitals in states without such coverage P lt 001 Morris BJ Bailis SA Wiswell TE May 2014 Circumcision rates in the United States rising or falling What effect might the new affirmative pediatric policy statement have Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89 5 677 86 doi 10 1016 j mayocp 2014 01 001 PMID 24702735 Waskett Jake H August 2007 Hospital Discharge Data Underestimate Circumcision Rates Sexually Transmitted Diseases 34 8 624 doi 10 1097 OLQ 0b013e3180de2120 ISSN 0148 5717 PMID 17667534 Archived from the original on 27 November 2022 Retrieved 16 December 2022 Researchers should be aware that infant circumcision rates in the United States are likely to be significantly higher than hospital discharge data might suggest Fairbanks Rossi Lisa Fretting over Foreskin Inlander Archived from the original on 4 October 2021 Retrieved 4 October 2021 Pfuntner A Wier L M Stocks C Most Frequent Procedures Performed in U S Hospitals 2011 HCUP Statistical Brief No 165 October 2013 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville MD 1 Archived 24 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine Report 10 of the Council on Scientific Affairs I 99 Neonatal Circumcision 1999 AMA Interim Meeting Summaries and Recommendations of Council on Scientific Affairs Reports American Medical Association December 1999 p 17 Archived from the original on 5 July 2007 Retrieved 13 June 2006 Brown MS Brown CA 1987 Circumcision decision prominence of social concerns Pediatrics 60 2 215 9 doi 10 1542 peds 80 2 215 PMID 3615091 S2CID 245205819 Archived from the original on 18 August 2012 Retrieved 19 July 2012 a b An Outpatient Observation of the Foreskin Among Chinese Children in Hong Kong PDF Singapore Medical Journal 24 2 April 1982 Archived PDF from the original on 24 June 2018 Retrieved 12 March 2021 National Family Health Survey rchiips org Archived from the original on 3 October 2021 Retrieved 15 March 2023 Wang Zixin Lau Joseph T F Gu Jing 2012 Acceptability of circumcision among clients of female sex worker in Hong Kong AIDS and Behavior 16 7 1836 1845 doi 10 1007 s10461 011 0088 7 ISSN 1573 3254 PMID 22080385 S2CID 23556728 Chen Chia Hung Cheng Wei Ming Fan Yu Hua Chang Tung Ping 9 February 2023 Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan Scientific Reports 13 1 2313 Bibcode 2023NatSR 13 2313C doi 10 1038 s41598 022 20140 8 ISSN 2045 2322 PMC 9911792 PMID 36759665 S2CID 256667132 a b c d Kim D Koo SA Pang MG December 2012 Decline in male circumcision in South Korea BMC Public Health 12 1067 doi 10 1186 1471 2458 12 1067 PMC 3526493 PMID 23227923 Ku JH Kim ME Lee NK Park YH February 2003 Circumcision practice patterns in South Korea community based survey Sexually Transmitted Infections 79 1 65 7 doi 10 1136 sti 79 1 65 PMC 1744613 PMID 12576619 Or Meital Yasur Beit November 2006 Israel teaches WHO about circumcision Ynetnews ynet news Archived from the original on 9 December 2018 Retrieved 29 March 2007 Darby R August 2011 Routine peripubertal circumcision CMAJ 183 11 1283 4 doi 10 1503 cmaj 111 2060 PMC 3153524 PMID 21825054 Ong Christine 29 May 2008 Philippine doctors question medical benefits of circumcision Channel News Asia MediaCorp Archived from the original on 4 January 2011 Retrieved 27 August 2012 a b Kamtsiuris P Bergmann E Rattay P Schlaud M 2007 Use of medical services Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents KiGGS Use of medical services Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents KiGGS Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz in German 50 5 6 836 50 doi 10 1007 s00103 007 0247 1 PMID 17514470 S2CID 29786579 a b Dave SS Fenton KA Mercer CH Erens B Wellings K Johnson AM December 2003 Male circumcision in Britain findings from a national probability sample survey Sexually Transmitted Infections 79 6 499 500 doi 10 1136 sti 79 6 499 PMC 1744763 PMID 14663134 Scholz Benjamin jungsfragen Niemand geht dumm ins Bett jungsfragen de in German Archived from the original on 14 March 2023 Retrieved 1 March 2023 Rickwood AM Kenny SE Donnell SC September 2000 Towards evidence based circumcision of English boys survey of trends in practice BMJ 321 7264 792 3 doi 10 1136 bmj 321 7264 792 PMC 27490 PMID 11009516 Alberts C J Michel A Bruisten S Snijder M B Prins M Waterboer T Schim van der Loeff M F 1 June 2017 High risk human papillomavirus seroprevalence in men and women of six different ethnicities in Amsterdam the Netherlands The HELIUS study Papillomavirus Research 3 57 65 doi 10 1016 j pvr 2017 01 003 ISSN 2405 8521 PMC 5883189 PMID 28720457 Van Bilsen Ward P H Kovaleva Alexandra Bleeker Maaike C G King Audrey J Bruisten Sylvia M Brokking Wilma De Vries Henry J C Meijer Chris J L M Schim Van Der Loeff Maarten F 2019 HPV infections and flat penile lesions of the penis in men who have sex with men Papillomavirus Research 8 100173 doi 10 1016 j pvr 2019 100173 PMC 6595232 PMID 31226447 Telephone survey of the TNS Sofres Institute commissioned by Manix 2008 Archived 8 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine Ortqvist L Fossum M Andersson M Nordenstrom A Frisen L Holmdahl G Nordenskjold A 2017 Sexuality and fertility in men with hypospadias improved outcome Andrology 5 2 286 293 doi 10 1111 andr 12309 ISSN 2047 2927 PMID 27992969 S2CID 207012229 Frisch M Friis S Kjaer SK Melbye M December 1995 Falling incidence of penis cancer in an uncircumcised population Denmark 1943 90 BMJ 311 7018 1471 doi 10 1136 bmj 311 7018 1471 PMC 2543732 PMID 8520335 name Projekt SEXUS www projektsexus dk in Danish Archived from the original on 13 March 2023 Retrieved 13 March 2023 Ganczak Maria 20 October 2017 Polish medical students attitudes regarding male circumcision as a strategy to HIV prevention European Journal of Public Health 27 3 doi 10 1093 eurpub ckx189 036 Klavs I Hamers FF February 2008 Male circumcision in Slovenia results from a national probability sample survey Sexually Transmitted Infections 84 1 49 50 doi 10 1136 sti 2007 027524 PMID 17881413 S2CID 24535897 Maija K Taskinen S Esinahan kirurgia PDF Archived PDF from the original on 4 March 2016 Retrieved 20 October 2015 a b Bronselaer Guy A Schober Justine M Meyer Bahlburg Heino F L T Sjoen Guy Vlietinck Robert Hoebeke Piet B 2013 Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity BJU International 111 5 820 827 doi 10 1111 j 1464 410X 2012 11761 x PMID 23374102 S2CID 25379775 Archived from the original on 24 February 2020 Retrieved 13 March 2023 a b Claeys Wietse Bronselaer Guy Lumen Nicolaas Hoebeke Piet Spinoit Anne Francoise 2023 The self assessment of genital anatomy sexual function and genital sensation SAGASF M questionnaire in a Belgian Dutch speaking male population A validating study Andrology 11 3 489 500 doi 10 1111 andr 13348 ISSN 2047 2919 PMID 36426587 S2CID 253880096 Archived from the original on 13 March 2023 Retrieved 13 March 2023 13 HIV AIDS Related Knowledge Attitudes and Behavior PDF Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017 18 Institute of Statistics Albania p 247 Archived from the original PDF on 10 January 2019 Morris Brian J Wamai Richard G Henebeng Esther B Tobian Aaron AR Klausner Jeffrey D Banerjee Joya Hankins Catherine A 2016 Estimation of country specific and global prevalence of male circumcision Population Health Metrics 14 4 doi 10 1186 s12963 016 0073 5 PMC 4772313 PMID 26933388 12 10 Male Circumcision PDF Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2008 09 March 2010 p 203 Archived PDF from the original on 9 October 2022 Retrieved 10 December 2015 Institute of Statistics Institute of Public Health and ICF 2018 Albania Demographic and Health Survey 2017 18 Tirana Albania Institute of Statistics Institute of Public Health and ICF 2017 2018 Albania DHS 2017 18 Final Report English Archived from the original on 4 June 2023 Retrieved 8 June 2023 a href Template Cite web html title Template Cite web cite web a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Trends in pediatric circumcision in Belgium and the Brussels University Hospital from 1994 to 2012 Scriptieprijs scriptiebank be Archived from the original on 13 March 2023 Retrieved 13 March 2023 Incidence and prevalence of circumcision in Australia Circumcision Information Australia January 2013 Archived from the original on 6 October 2018 Retrieved 26 June 2018 Smith AM Pitts MK Shelley JM Richters J Ferris J July 2007 The Australian longitudinal study of health and relationships BMC Public Health 7 139 doi 10 1186 1471 2458 7 139 PMC 1931435 PMID 17608953 Richters J Smith AM de Visser RO Grulich AE Rissel CE August 2006 Circumcision in Australia prevalence and effects on sexual health International Journal of STD amp AIDS 17 8 547 54 doi 10 1258 095646206778145730 PMID 16925903 S2CID 24396989 Circumcision of Male Infants Royal Australasian College of Physicians September 2010 Archived from the original on 10 February 2013 Retrieved 24 May 2021 The incidence of circumcision in Australia was very high until 1971 when it started a steep decline Consequently circumcised males tend to be older Rashida Yosufzai 19 February 2018 Why is the number of male circumcisions declining in Australia SBS News Archived from the original on 30 April 2019 Retrieved 26 June 2018 a b Afsari M Beasley SW Maoate K Heckert K March 2002 Attitudes of Pacific parents to circumcision of boys Pacific Health Dialog 9 1 29 33 PMID 12737414 Circumcision for cultural reasons is routine in Pacific Island countries Dickson N van Roode T Paul C August 2005 Herpes simplex virus type 2 status at age 26 is not related to early circumcision in a birth cohort Sexually Transmitted Diseases 32 8 517 9 doi 10 1097 01 olq 0000161296 58095 ab PMID 16041257 S2CID 34088021 Fergusson DM Boden JM Horwood LJ November 2006 Circumcision status and risk of sexually transmitted infection in young adult males an analysis of a longitudinal birth cohort Pediatrics 118 5 1971 7 doi 10 1542 peds 2006 1175 PMID 17079568 S2CID 72751030 Lawrenson RA May 1991 Current practice of neonatal circumcision in the Waikato The New Zealand Medical Journal 104 911 184 5 PMID 1898442 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Prevalence of circumcision amp oldid 1182360497, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.