fbpx
Wikipedia

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (NAACP LDF, the Legal Defense Fund, or LDF) is an American civil rights organization and law firm based in New York City.

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
AbbreviationLDF
FormationFebruary 12, 1940; 84 years ago (1940-02-12)
TypeNon-profit organization
Headquarters40 Rector Street, 5th floor New York City, New York, 10006 U.S.
Region served
United States
President and Director-Counsel
Janai Nelson
Websitewww.naacpldf.org

LDF is wholly independent and separate from the NAACP.[1] Although LDF can trace its origins to the legal department of the NAACP created by Charles Hamilton Houston in the 1930s,[2][3] Thurgood Marshall founded LDF as a separate legal entity in 1940, which became totally independent from the NAACP in 1957.[1]

Janai Nelson currently serves as the eighth President and Director-Counsel, since March 2022.[4] Previous Director-Counsels include Sherrilyn Ifill (2012–2022), John Payton (2008–2012), Ted Shaw (2004–2008), Elaine Jones (1993–2004), Julius Levonne Chambers (1984–1993), Jack Greenberg (1961–1984), and founder Thurgood Marshall (1940–1961).[5]

About edit

While primarily focused on the civil rights of African Americans in the U.S., LDF states it has "been instrumental in the formation of similar organizations that have replicated its organizational model in order to promote equality for Asian-Americans, Latinos, and women in the United States." LDF has also been involved in "the campaign for human rights throughout the world, including in South Africa, Canada, Brazil, and elsewhere."[1]

LDF's national office is in Manhattan, with regional offices in Washington, D.C. LDF has nearly two dozen staff lawyers and hundreds of cooperating attorneys across the nation.[1]

Areas of activity edit

  • Litigation
  • Advocacy
  • Educational outreach
  • Policy research and monitoring legislation
  • Coalition-building
  • Provides scholarships for exceptional African-American students.

Areas of concern edit

Creation and separation from the NAACP edit

The board of directors of the NAACP created the Legal Defense Fund in 1940 specifically for tax purposes.[6] In 1957, LDF was completely separated from the NAACP and given its own independent board and staff.[6] Although LDF was originally meant to operate in accordance with NAACP policy, after 1961, serious disputes emerged between the two organizations. These disputes ultimately led the NAACP to create its own internal legal department while LDF continued to operate and score significant legal victories as an independent organization.[3][7]

At times, this separation has created considerable confusion in the eyes and minds of the public.[7] In the 1980s, the NAACP unsuccessfully sued LDF for trademark infringement.[3] In its ruling rejecting the NAACP's lawsuit, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recognized that the "universal esteem in which the [NAACP] initials are held is due in significant measure to [LDF's] distinguished record as a civil rights litigator" and that the NAACP has "benefitted from the added luster given to the NAACP initials by the LDF's litigation successes."[3]

Well-known cases edit

Probably the most famous case in the history of LDF was Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark case in 1954 in which the United States Supreme Court explicitly outlawed de jure racial segregation of public education facilities. During the civil rights protests of the 1960s, LDF represented "the legal arm of the civil rights movement" and provided counsel for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., among others.[1]

1930s edit

  • 1935 Murray v. Pearson, removed unconstitutional color bar from the University of Maryland School of Law admission policy. (Managed by Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP before the formal foundation of LDF.)
  • 1938: Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, invalidated state laws that denied African-American students access to all-white state graduate schools when no separate state graduate schools were available for African Americans. (Handled by Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP before the formal foundation of LDF.)

1940s edit

1950s edit

1960s edit

1970s edit

  • 1970: Ali v. The Division of State Athletic Commission, restored Muhammad Ali's boxing license.
  • 1970: Carter v. Jury Commission, approved Federal suits over discrimination in the selection of juries.
  • 1970: Turner v. Fouche, overruled a requirement in Taliaferro County, Georgia that grand jury and school board membership be limited to owners of real property.
  • 1971: Kennedy-Park Homes Association v. City of Lackawanna, forbade a city government from interfering in the construction of low-income housing in a predominantly white section of the city.
  • 1971: Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, upheld intra-district busing to desegregate public schools. However, this issue was contested in the courts for three more decades. In the most recent as of 2004 related cases, the U.S. Supreme Court in April 2002 refused to review Cappachione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and Belk v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, in which lower courts had ruled in favor of the school district.
  • 1971: Haines v. Kerner, upheld the right of prisoners to challenge prison conditions in federal court.
  • 1971: Groppi v. Wisconsin, upheld the right of a criminal defendant in a misdemeanor case to a venue where jurors are not biased against him.
  • 1971: Clay v. United States, struck down Muhammad Ali's conviction for refusing to report for military service.
  • 1971: Griggs v. Duke Power Company, ruled that tests for employment or promotion that produce different outcomes for blacks and whites are prima facie to be presumed discriminatory, and must measure aptitude for the job in question or they cannot be used.
  • 1971: Phillips v. Martin Marietta, ruled that employers may not refuse to hire women with pre-school-aged children unless the same standards are applied to men.
  • 1972: Furman v. Georgia, ruled that the death penalty as then applied in 37 states violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment because there were inadequate standards to guide judges and juries making the decision which defendants will receive a sentence of death. However, under revised laws, U.S. executions resumed in 1977.
  • 1972: Wright v. Council of the City of Emporia and U.S. v. Scotland Neck City Board of Education, ruled against systems' avoiding public school desegregation by the creation of all-white "splinter districts".
  • 1972: Alexander v. Louisiana, accepted the use of statistical evidence to prove racial discrimination in the selection of juries.
  • 1972: Hawkins v. Town of Shaw, banned discrimination in the provision of municipal facilities.
  • 1973: Norwood v. Harrison banned government provision of school books to segregated private schools established to allow whites to avoid public school desegregation.
  • 1973: Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, addressed deliberate de facto school segregation, ruling that where deliberate segregation was shown to have affected a substantial part of a school system, the entire district must ordinarily be desegregated.
  • 1973: Adams v. Richardson, required federal education officials to enforce Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which requires that state universities, public schools, and other institutions that receive federal money may not discriminate by race.
  • 1973: Ham v. South Carolina, ruled that defendants are entitled to have potential jurors interrogated about whether they harbor racial prejudices.
  • 1973: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, ruled that courts should hear cases of alleged unlawful discrimination based on the "minimal showing" that a qualified non-white applied unsuccessfully for a job that either remained open or was filled by a white person.
  • 1973: Mourning v. Family Publication Service, upheld the Truth in lending Act, requiring disclosure of the actual cost of a loan.
  • 1975: Albemarle v. Moody, mandated back pay for victims of job discrimination.
  • 1975: Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1866, passed during Reconstruction, as providing an independent remedy for employment discrimination.
  • 1977: Coker v. Georgia, banned capital punishment for rape, the most racially disproportionate application of the death penalty.
  • 1977: United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v. Carey, provided that states may consider race in drawing electoral districts if necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by avoiding a dilution of minority voting strength.

1980s edit

  • 1980: Luévano v. Campbell, struck down Federal government use of a written test for hiring into nearly 200 entry-level positions because the test disproportionately disqualified African Americans and Latinos.
  • 1980: Enmund v. Florida, struck down a federal "felony murder" statute.
  • 1982: Bob Jones University v. U.S. and Goldboro Christian Schools v. U.S., denied tax exempt status to religious schools that discriminate on the basis of race.
  • 1983: Major v. Treen, overturned a Louisiana gerrymander intended to reduce African-American voting strength.
  • 1984: Gingles v. Edmisten, continued as Thornburg v. Gingles (1986), the Supreme Court ruled that at-large countywide election of state legislators illegally discriminated against black voters, and the Court established the standard for identifying "vote dilution" under the 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act.
  • 1986: Dillard v. Crenshaw County Commission: a district court ordered over 180 of the local government bodies in counties, cities, and school boards in Alabama to change their methods of election because intentionally racially discriminatory state laws had made it extremely difficult for Black voters to elect their preferred candidates to local office.[9]
  • 1987: McClesky v. Kemp: in a 5–4 vote, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected a challenge to Georgia's death penalty and held that statistical evidence showing pervasive racial bias in the administration of the death penalty was not sufficient to invalidate a death sentence.[10]
  • 1988: Jiggets v. Housing Authority of City of Elizabeth: a district court ordered the HUD to spend $4 million to upgrade predominantly black, as well as predominantly white, housing projects in the city, and to implement federal maintenance, tenant selection and other procedures equitably.
  • 1989: Cook v. Ochsner: in a belated coda to Simkins v. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital, a District Court approved a settlement ending a New Orleans hospital's discrimination in emergency room treatment and patient admissions. The settlement also provided increased opportunities for African-American physicians to practice at the hospital.

1990s edit

  • 1990: Missouri v. Jenkins, established that a federal court could order local tax increases to fund magnet schools as a part of a school desegregation order.
  • 1991: Chisom v. Roemer and Houston Lawyers Association v. Attorney General, established that Voting Rights Act applies to the election of judges.
  • 1991: Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. Dowell, established the standard for resolving longstanding school desegregation orders.
  • 1992: Matthews v. Coye and Thompson v. Raiford, compelled California and Texas, respectively, to enforce and implement federal regulations calling for testing of poor children for lead poisoning.
  • 1993: Haynes v. Shoney's: A record court-approved settlement in an employment discrimination case. Shoney's Restaurants agreed to pay African-American employees, applicants, and white managers who resisted the practices, $105 million and to implement aggressive equal employment opportunity measures.[11]
  • 1994: Lawson v. City of Los Angeles and Silva v. City of Los Angeles, led to settlements to end discriminatory use of police dogs in minority neighborhoods.
  • 1995: McKennon v. Nashville Banner: The Supreme Court refused to allow employers to defeat otherwise valid claims of job discrimination by relying on facts they did not know until after the discriminatory decision had been made.
  • 1996: Sheff v. O'Neill: The Supreme Court of Connecticut, in view of the disparities between Hartford public schools and schools in the surrounding suburbs, found the state liable for maintaining racial and ethnic isolation, and ordered the legislative and executive branches to propose a remedy.
  • 1997: Robinson v. Shell Oil Company, determined that a former employee may sue his ex-employer for retaliating against him (by giving a bad job reference) after he filed discrimination charges over his termination.
  • 1998: Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp., determined that a general arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement did not deprive an employee of his right to enforce federal anti-discrimination laws in federal court.
  • 1999: Campaign to Save Our Public Hospitals v. Giuliani, barred New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani's attempt to privatize public hospitals.

2000s edit

  • 2000: Rideau v. Whitley, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit threw out the 28-year-old, third conviction of Wilbert Rideau for murder because of discrimination in the composition of the Grand Jury that originally indicted him more than 40 years earlier. (Rideau was retried, convicted on the lesser charge of manslaughter, and released in 2005.)
  • 2000: Smith v. United States, was resolved when President Clinton commuted the sentence of Kemba Smith. Smith was a young African-American mother whose abusive, domineering boyfriend led her to play a peripheral role (she did not sell drugs but was aware of the selling) in a conspiracy to obtain and distribute crack cocaine. She had been sentenced to a mandatory minimum of 24+12 years in prison even though she was a first-time offender.
  • 2000: Cromartie v. Hunt and Daly v. Hunt, ruled that it is legal to create, for partisan political reasons, a district with a high concentration of minority voters; hence the North Carolina district from which Mel Watt was elected to the House of Representatives was ruled not to be an illegal gerrymander.
  • 2003: Gratz v. Bollinger, ordered the University of Michigan to change admission policies by removing racial quotas in the form of "points", but allowed them to continue to utilize race as a factor in admissions, to admit a diverse entering class of students.
  • 2007: Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, the Supreme Court ruled racial quotas unconstitutional in PK–12 school assignment, but allowed other remedial school integration programs to continue[12]
  • 2009: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, the Supreme Court ruled the Voting Rights Act Section 5 preclearance process constitutional. LDF presented oral argument at the Supreme Court on behalf of a group of African-American voters.[13]

2010s edit

  • 2010: Lewis v. City of Chicago, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the City of Chicago can be held accountable for each and every time it used a hiring practice that arbitrarily blocked qualified minority applicants from employment. LDF presented oral argument in this case in the Supreme Court.[14]
  • 2013: Shelby County v. Holder, the Supreme Court struck down Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act, ending the Section 5 preclearance regime. LDF presented oral argument and represented a group of African-American voters in the Supreme Court.[15]
  • 2013: Fisher v. University of Texas, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action, and remanded the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for a second view. LDF represented the Black Student Alliance and the Black Ex-Students of Texas, Inc.[10]
  • 2014: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Michigan's Proposal 2 voter initiative, which amended the state's constitution to make affirmative action illegal in public employment, public education or public contracting purposes. LDF represented the Plaintiffs challenging Proposal 2.[10]
  • 2016: Fisher v. University of Texas II, Following the remand to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court again upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action. LDF represented the Black Student Alliance and the Black Ex-Students of Texas, Inc. in oral argument before the U.S. Court of Appeals and in an amicus brief in the Supreme Court.[16]
  • 2016: Veasey v. Abbott, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, sitting en banc, held that Texas's 2011 voter photo identification law violated the Voting Rights Act and that there was sufficient evidence to find that the Texas Legislature might have passed the law for the purpose of discriminating against Black and Latino voters. LDF presented oral argument in the Fifth Circuit on behalf of Black students and the Texas League of Young Voters.[17]
  • 2017: Buck v. Davis, the Supreme Court reversed the death sentence of Mr. Duane Buck because Mr. Buck's trial attorney introduced evidence that suggested Mr. Buck was more likely to commit violent acts in the future because he is black. LDF represented and presented oral argument on Mr. Buck's behalf in the Supreme Court.[10]
  • 2018: Stout v. Jefferson County Board of Education and Gardendale Board of Education, The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, blocked the City of Gardendale's attempt to secede from the larger Jefferson County school system because Gardendale's purpose was to create a mostly white school system separate from the more racially diverse Jefferson County schools. LDF represents and presented oral arguments on behalf of Black students opposed to the separation.[18]

2020s edit

  • 2020: LDF v. Barr, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to LDF and ruled that the Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice violated multiple requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, halting the Commission's operations until it was brought into compliance with federal law.[19]
  • 2020: Harding v. Edwards, in September 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction that required Louisiana to extend the early voting period by three days and provided voters at highest risk of serious illness from COVID-19 with the option to vote by mail in the November and December 2020 primary and general elections.[20]
  • 2020: Thomas v. Andino, in May 2020, the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina granted a preliminary junction that prohibited South Carolina from enforcing its witness signature requirement for absentee voters in the June 2020 primary elections. The court found that forcing people to obtain the signature of a third-party witness on their absentee ballot would endanger their health and safety in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.[21]
  • 2020: NAACP v. United States Postal Service, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the US Postal Service's widespread disruptions in mail delivery violated federal law and risked delaying the delivery of mail-in ballots — thereby causing voter disenfranchisement. On October 10, 2020, the court granted a preliminary injunction motion suspending service changes that had disrupted mail delivery. The court issued a series of additional orders leading up to the November 2020 General Election, which required the US Postal Service to take extraordinary measures to ensure the timely delivery of ballots and to provide daily updates about the delivery status of mail-in ballots. LDF represented the NAACP and individuals in the litigation.[22]
  • 2023: Allen v. Milligan, on June 8, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed a preliminary injunction against the State of Alabama's 2021 congressional districts and ruled that Alabama's map is racially discriminatory in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court also upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act in the redistricting context. LDF represented Milligan plaintiffs in the lower courts and presented oral argument on behalf of the Milligan appellees in the Supreme Court.
  • 2024: Robinson v. Ardoin, On June 6, 2022, the middle district of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction against Louisiana’s congressional map, which contained one majority-minority district out of six districts despite Louisiana having a black population of about 30%. While the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declined to stay the ruling, on June 28, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari before judgment and stayed the case pending the outcome of Milligan. After the Milligan decision, on June 26, 2023, the Supreme Court dismissed Louisiana's appeal and ordered the case to be resolved in the lower courts “in advance of the 2024 elections.” After further review, on November 10, 2023, the Fifth Circuit agreed that Louisiana likely violated the Voting Rights Act, and ruled that the Louisiana state legislature must draw a new, fair map by January 15, 2024, or the district court would proceed with trial on the Voting Rights Act claims in early 2024. On January 19, 2024, the Louisiana Legislature responded by drawing a new congressional map that added a second majority-Black district. LDF represented the Robinson plaintiffs in the Supreme Court and lower courts.
  • 2024: Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP, on January 6, 2023, a three-judge district court ruled against the State of South Carolina’s 2021 congressional map and concluded that the map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and intentionally discriminatory in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. The Supreme Court took the case up on direct appeal and heard oral arguments on October 11, 2023. LDF represented the plaintiffs at trial and presented oral argument on their behalf in the Supreme Court.

Prominent LDF alumni edit

A number of prominent attorneys have been affiliated with LDF over the years, including Barack Obama who was an LDF cooperating attorney.[1] The following, non-exhaustive list of LDF alumni demonstrates the breadth of positions these attorneys have held or currently hold in public service, the government, academia, the private sector, and other areas.

References edit

  1. ^ a b c d e f g "Transformative History of the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
  2. ^ "LDF@70: 70 Years of Fulfilling the Promise of Equality" (PDF). Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  3. ^ a b c d "NAACP v. NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., 753 F.2d 131 (D.C. Circuit 1985)". Retrieved November 19, 2010.
  4. ^ "Introducing LDF's New President and Director-Counsel: Janai Nelson". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved April 28, 2022.
  5. ^ "History". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  6. ^ a b . History of the Federal Judiciary. Federal Judicial Center. Archived from the original on February 21, 2014.
  7. ^ a b Hooks (1979)
  8. ^ Tarter, Brent. "Aline Elizabeth Black (1906–1974)". Encyclopedia Virginia. Retrieved August 24, 2015.
  9. ^ (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on July 6, 2020
  10. ^ a b c d "NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
  11. ^ ...
    • Haynes v. Shoney's, 803 F. Supp. 393 (N.D. Fla. March 12, 1992).
    • Haynes v. Shoney's, WL 19915 (N.D. Fla. January 25, 1993).
    • "Notice of proposed class action settlement and consent decree [legal advertisement]". The Times. Munster, Indiana. November 25, 1992. p. C5. Retrieved April 15, 2018 – via Newspapers.com. 
    • Kaczor, Bill (January 26, 1993). "Judge approves racial discrimination settlement". Tallahassee Democrat. p. 7B. Retrieved April 15, 2018 – via Newspapers.com.  
  12. ^ http://www.naacpldf.org/timeline.aspx, The official site provides a Flash-based history of the major cases taken on by LDF. This article has taken extensive portions of this page with the permission of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., the copyright holder of that material.
  13. ^ "Supreme Court Ruling Leaves in Place Core Provision of the Voting Rights Act". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  14. ^ . Archived from the original on November 27, 2010.
  15. ^ "Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  16. ^ "U.S. Supreme Court Ruling Reaffirms the Importance of Diversity in College Admissions". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
  17. ^ "LDF Applauds Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc Decision Finding Texas Voter ID Law Discriminatory". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  18. ^ "LDF Applauds Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc Decision Finding Texas Voter ID Law Discriminatory". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
  19. ^ "LDF v. Barr". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  20. ^ "Harding v. Ewards". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved May 4, 2022.
  21. ^ "Thomas v. Andino". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved October 1, 2020.
  22. ^ "LDF Files Agreement Requiring USPS to Implement Key Measures to Prioritize and Expedite Ballot Delivery in Georgia Runoff Election". NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
  23. ^ "U.S. Senate Confirms EEOC Chair, Two Commissioners and General Counsel". www.eeoc.gov. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  24. ^ Shechet, Ellie (November 2, 2018). "The Most Important Midterm Race is One You Haven't Heard About". Vice. Retrieved June 3, 2019.
  25. ^ Robert L. Carter
  26. ^ Mississippi Freedom Summer
  27. ^ Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education, Green v. County School Board of New Kent County
  28. ^ 'Eric Holder In Profile,' Washington Post, November 18, 2008
  29. ^ 1997-Elaine Jones 2009-05-15 at the Wayback Machine
  30. ^ "The New York Times – Search". topics.nytimes.com. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  31. ^ "David Kendall – Williams & Connolly LLP". www.wc.com. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  32. ^ Holmes, Steven A. (June 12, 1997). "Asian-American Is Named To Top Civil Rights Position". The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  33. ^ "Dennis D. Parker - National Center for Law and Economic Justice".
  34. ^ Weigel, David (August 22, 2012). "Reince Priebus, The Least Interesting Man in the World". Slate. ISSN 1091-2339. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  35. ^ "Theodore M. Shaw". www.law.unc.edu. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  36. ^ "LDF President Ted Shaw Joins Columbia Law Faculty". Columbia Law School. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  37. ^ . Law.columbia.edu. November 9, 1961. Archived from the original on July 28, 2010. Retrieved December 9, 2010.
  38. ^ "NAACP's Theodore Shaw to Discuss "The Continuing Struggle for Racial Justice"". Office of Communications. Retrieved October 25, 2018.
  39. ^ "Meet the people behind the Innocence Project".
  40. ^ "MSNBC Public Relations on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved August 27, 2018.
  41. ^ Mueller, Benjamin (August 31, 2017). "Chairwoman Steps Down at New York City Police Oversight Agency". The New York Times.

Further reading edit

  • Clemon, U. W., and Bryan K. Fair. "Making Bricks Without Straw: The NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the Development of Civil Rights Law in Alabama 1940-1980." Alabama Law Review 52 (2000): 1121+. online
  • Greenberg, Jack. Crusaders in the Courts: Legal Battles of the Civil Rights Movement (2004)
  • Hooks, Benjamin L. "Birth and Separation of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund," Crisis 1979 86(6): 218–220. 0011–1422
  • King, Gilbert. Devil in the Grove: Thurgood Marshall, the Groveland Boys, and the Dawn of a New America (2012) Pulitzer Prize; excerpt
  • Klinetobe, Charles. "Jury Trials and Gerrymanders: The Legal Effort to Maintain Segregation in July of 1957." The Historian 68.2 (2006): 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6563.2006.00141.x
  • Mosnier, L. Joseph. Crafting Law in the Second Reconstruction: Julius Chambers, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and Title VII. (2005).
  • Tauber, Steven C. "The NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the U.S. Supreme Court's Racial Discrimination Decision Making," Social Science Quarterly 1999 80(2): 325–340.
  • Tauber, Steven C. "On Behalf of the Condemned? The Impact of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund on Capital Punishment Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals," Political Research Quarterly 1998 51(1): 191–219.
  • Tushnet, Mark V. Making Civil Rights Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1936–1961 (1994)
  • Ware, Gilbert. "The NAACP-Inc. Fund Alliance: Its Strategy, Power, and Destruction," Journal of Negro Education 1994 63(3): 323–335. in JSTOR
  • Watkins, Steve. The Black O: Racism and Redemption in an American Corporate Empire (2013) specific to the 1993 Haynes v. Shoney's case. portions in Google Books

External links edit

  • NAACP-LDF Official Website
  • Thurgood Marshall Institute at LDF

naacp, legal, defense, educational, fund, naacp, legal, defense, fund, american, civil, rights, organization, firm, based, york, city, abbreviationldfformationfebruary, 1940, years, 1940, typenon, profit, organizationheadquarters40, rector, street, floor, york. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc NAACP LDF the Legal Defense Fund or LDF is an American civil rights organization and law firm based in New York City NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc AbbreviationLDFFormationFebruary 12 1940 84 years ago 1940 02 12 TypeNon profit organizationHeadquarters40 Rector Street 5th floor New York City New York 10006 U S Region servedUnited StatesPresident and Director CounselJanai NelsonWebsitewww naacpldf orgLDF is wholly independent and separate from the NAACP 1 Although LDF can trace its origins to the legal department of the NAACP created by Charles Hamilton Houston in the 1930s 2 3 Thurgood Marshall founded LDF as a separate legal entity in 1940 which became totally independent from the NAACP in 1957 1 Janai Nelson currently serves as the eighth President and Director Counsel since March 2022 4 Previous Director Counsels include Sherrilyn Ifill 2012 2022 John Payton 2008 2012 Ted Shaw 2004 2008 Elaine Jones 1993 2004 Julius Levonne Chambers 1984 1993 Jack Greenberg 1961 1984 and founder Thurgood Marshall 1940 1961 5 Contents 1 About 1 1 Areas of activity 1 2 Areas of concern 2 Creation and separation from the NAACP 3 Well known cases 3 1 1930s 3 2 1940s 3 3 1950s 3 4 1960s 3 5 1970s 3 6 1980s 3 7 1990s 3 8 2000s 3 9 2010s 3 10 2020s 4 Prominent LDF alumni 5 References 6 Further reading 7 External linksAbout editWhile primarily focused on the civil rights of African Americans in the U S LDF states it has been instrumental in the formation of similar organizations that have replicated its organizational model in order to promote equality for Asian Americans Latinos and women in the United States LDF has also been involved in the campaign for human rights throughout the world including in South Africa Canada Brazil and elsewhere 1 LDF s national office is in Manhattan with regional offices in Washington D C LDF has nearly two dozen staff lawyers and hundreds of cooperating attorneys across the nation 1 Areas of activity edit Litigation Advocacy Educational outreach Policy research and monitoring legislation Coalition building Provides scholarships for exceptional African American students Areas of concern edit Education Affirmative action Desegregation Political Participation Voting rights Felony disfranchisement Economic access Employment discrimination Environmental justice Fair housing Criminal justice Opposition to the death penalty Fourth Amendment Sixth AmendmentCreation and separation from the NAACP editThe board of directors of the NAACP created the Legal Defense Fund in 1940 specifically for tax purposes 6 In 1957 LDF was completely separated from the NAACP and given its own independent board and staff 6 Although LDF was originally meant to operate in accordance with NAACP policy after 1961 serious disputes emerged between the two organizations These disputes ultimately led the NAACP to create its own internal legal department while LDF continued to operate and score significant legal victories as an independent organization 3 7 At times this separation has created considerable confusion in the eyes and minds of the public 7 In the 1980s the NAACP unsuccessfully sued LDF for trademark infringement 3 In its ruling rejecting the NAACP s lawsuit the U S Court of Appeals for the D C Circuit recognized that the universal esteem in which the NAACP initials are held is due in significant measure to LDF s distinguished record as a civil rights litigator and that the NAACP has benefitted from the added luster given to the NAACP initials by the LDF s litigation successes 3 Well known cases editProbably the most famous case in the history of LDF was Brown v Board of Education the landmark case in 1954 in which the United States Supreme Court explicitly outlawed de jure racial segregation of public education facilities During the civil rights protests of the 1960s LDF represented the legal arm of the civil rights movement and provided counsel for Dr Martin Luther King Jr among others 1 1930s edit 1935 Murray v Pearson removed unconstitutional color bar from the University of Maryland School of Law admission policy Managed by Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP before the formal foundation of LDF 1938 Missouri ex rel Gaines v Canada invalidated state laws that denied African American students access to all white state graduate schools when no separate state graduate schools were available for African Americans Handled by Thurgood Marshall for the NAACP before the formal foundation of LDF 1940s edit 1940 Abbington v Board of Education of Louisville KY a suit argued by Thurgood Marshall and dropped though the settlement led to the removal of a 15 percent salary discrepancy between black and white teachers in the Louisville Kentucky public schools see NAACP in Kentucky 1940 Alston v School Board of City of Norfolk a federal court order that African American public school teachers be paid salaries equal to whites regardless of race 8 1940 Chambers v Florida overturned the convictions based on coerced confessions of four young black defendants accused of murdering an elderly white man 1944 Smith v Allwright a voting rights case in which the Supreme Court required Texas to allow African Americans to vote in primary elections formerly restricted to whites 1946 Morgan v Virginia desegregated seating on interstate buses 1947 Patton v Mississippi ruled against strategies that excluded African Americans from criminal juries 1948 Shelley v Kraemer overturned racially discriminatory real estate covenants 1948 Sipuel v Board of Regents of Univ of Okla reaffirmed and extended Missouri ex rel Gaines v Canada ruling that Oklahoma could not bar an African American student from its all white law school on the ground that she had not requested the state to provide a separate law school for black students 1950s edit 1950 McLaurin v Oklahoma State Regents ruled against practices of segregation within a formerly all white graduate school insofar as they interfered with meaningful classroom instruction and interaction with other students 1950 Sweatt v Painter ruled against a Texas attempt to circumvent Missouri ex rel Gaines v Canada with a hastily established inferior law school for black students 1953 Barrows v Jackson reaffirmed Shelley v Kraemer preventing state courts from enforcing restrictive covenants 1954 Brown v Board of Education explicitly outlawed de jure racial segregation of public education facilities 1956 Jackson v Rawdon required desegregation of Mansfield High School outside Fort Worth Texas see also Mansfield school desegregation incident 1956 Gayle v Browder overturned segregation of city buses see also Montgomery bus boycott 1957 Fikes v Alabama a further ruling against forced confessions 1958 Cooper v Aaron barred Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus from interfering with the desegregation of Little Rock s Central High School see also Little Rock Nine 1960s edit 1961 Holmes v Danner began the desegregation of the University of Georgia 1962 Meredith v Fair won James Meredith admission to the University of Mississippi 1963 LDF attorneys defended Martin Luther King Jr against contempt charges for demonstrating without a permit in Birmingham Alabama See Letter from Birmingham Jail 1963 Watson v City of Memphis ruled segregation of public parks unconstitutional 1963 Simkins v Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital ended segregation of hospitals that received Federal construction funds 1964 Willis v Pickrick Restaurant ruled against segregation in public facilities such as restaurants Lester Maddox closed his restaurant rather than integrate 1964 McLaughlin v Florida ruled against anti miscegenation laws See also on this issue Eilers v Eilers argued by James A Crumlin Sr details in NAACP in Kentucky 1965 Williams v Wallace made court order to allow a voting rights march in Alabama led by Dr Martin Luther King Jr which had previously been stopped twice by state police 1965 Hamm v City of Rock Hill overturned all convictions of demonstrators participating in civil rights sit ins 1965 Abernathy v Alabama and Thomas v Mississippi reversed state convictions of Alabama and Mississippi Freedom Riders on the basis of Boynton v Virginia 1967 Quarles v Philip Morris overturned the practice of departmental seniority which had forced non white workers to give up their seniority rights when they transferred to better jobs in previously white only departments 1967 Green v County School Board of New Kent County ruled that freedom of choice was an insufficient response to segregated schools 1967 Loving v Virginia ruled that state laws banning interracial marriage anti miscegenation laws in Virginia and 15 other states were unconstitutional because they violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution 1968 Newman v Piggie Park established that prevailing plaintiffs in civil rights act cases are entitled to receive attorneys fees from the losing defendant 1969 Alexander v Holmes County Board of Education ruled that 33 Mississippi school districts must desegregate at once thereby ending the era of foot dragging in school desegregation permitted under the all deliberate speed doctrine of Brown v Board of Education 1969 Shuttlesworth v Birmingham ruled against using the parade permitting process as a means of suppressing First Amendment rights 1969 Thorpe v Housing Authority of Durham ruled that low income public housing tenants could not be summarily evicted 1969 Sniadach v Family Finance Corp required due process for the garnishment of wages 1969 Allen v State Board of Elections guaranteed the right to a write in vote 1970s edit 1970 Ali v The Division of State Athletic Commission restored Muhammad Ali s boxing license 1970 Carter v Jury Commission approved Federal suits over discrimination in the selection of juries 1970 Turner v Fouche overruled a requirement in Taliaferro County Georgia that grand jury and school board membership be limited to owners of real property 1971 Kennedy Park Homes Association v City of Lackawanna forbade a city government from interfering in the construction of low income housing in a predominantly white section of the city 1971 Swann v Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education upheld intra district busing to desegregate public schools However this issue was contested in the courts for three more decades In the most recent as of 2004 update related cases the U S Supreme Court in April 2002 refused to review Cappachione v Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education and Belk v Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education in which lower courts had ruled in favor of the school district 1971 Haines v Kerner upheld the right of prisoners to challenge prison conditions in federal court 1971 Groppi v Wisconsin upheld the right of a criminal defendant in a misdemeanor case to a venue where jurors are not biased against him 1971 Clay v United States struck down Muhammad Ali s conviction for refusing to report for military service 1971 Griggs v Duke Power Company ruled that tests for employment or promotion that produce different outcomes for blacks and whites are prima facie to be presumed discriminatory and must measure aptitude for the job in question or they cannot be used 1971 Phillips v Martin Marietta ruled that employers may not refuse to hire women with pre school aged children unless the same standards are applied to men 1972 Furman v Georgia ruled that the death penalty as then applied in 37 states violated the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment because there were inadequate standards to guide judges and juries making the decision which defendants will receive a sentence of death However under revised laws U S executions resumed in 1977 1972 Wright v Council of the City of Emporia and U S v Scotland Neck City Board of Education ruled against systems avoiding public school desegregation by the creation of all white splinter districts 1972 Alexander v Louisiana accepted the use of statistical evidence to prove racial discrimination in the selection of juries 1972 Hawkins v Town of Shaw banned discrimination in the provision of municipal facilities 1973 Norwood v Harrison banned government provision of school books to segregated private schools established to allow whites to avoid public school desegregation 1973 Keyes v School District No 1 Denver addressed deliberate de facto school segregation ruling that where deliberate segregation was shown to have affected a substantial part of a school system the entire district must ordinarily be desegregated 1973 Adams v Richardson required federal education officials to enforce Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act which requires that state universities public schools and other institutions that receive federal money may not discriminate by race 1973 Ham v South Carolina ruled that defendants are entitled to have potential jurors interrogated about whether they harbor racial prejudices 1973 McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green ruled that courts should hear cases of alleged unlawful discrimination based on the minimal showing that a qualified non white applied unsuccessfully for a job that either remained open or was filled by a white person 1973 Mourning v Family Publication Service upheld the Truth in lending Act requiring disclosure of the actual cost of a loan 1975 Albemarle v Moody mandated back pay for victims of job discrimination 1975 Johnson v Railway Express Agency upheld the Civil Rights Act of 1866 passed during Reconstruction as providing an independent remedy for employment discrimination 1977 Coker v Georgia banned capital punishment for rape the most racially disproportionate application of the death penalty 1977 United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh v Carey provided that states may consider race in drawing electoral districts if necessary to comply with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by avoiding a dilution of minority voting strength 1980s edit 1980 Luevano v Campbell struck down Federal government use of a written test for hiring into nearly 200 entry level positions because the test disproportionately disqualified African Americans and Latinos 1980 Enmund v Florida struck down a federal felony murder statute 1982 Bob Jones University v U S and Goldboro Christian Schools v U S denied tax exempt status to religious schools that discriminate on the basis of race 1983 Major v Treen overturned a Louisiana gerrymander intended to reduce African American voting strength 1984 Gingles v Edmisten continued as Thornburg v Gingles 1986 the Supreme Court ruled that at large countywide election of state legislators illegally discriminated against black voters and the Court established the standard for identifying vote dilution under the 1982 amendments to the Voting Rights Act 1986 Dillard v Crenshaw County Commission a district court ordered over 180 of the local government bodies in counties cities and school boards in Alabama to change their methods of election because intentionally racially discriminatory state laws had made it extremely difficult for Black voters to elect their preferred candidates to local office 9 1987 McClesky v Kemp in a 5 4 vote the U S Supreme Court rejected a challenge to Georgia s death penalty and held that statistical evidence showing pervasive racial bias in the administration of the death penalty was not sufficient to invalidate a death sentence 10 1988 Jiggets v Housing Authority of City of Elizabeth a district court ordered the HUD to spend 4 million to upgrade predominantly black as well as predominantly white housing projects in the city and to implement federal maintenance tenant selection and other procedures equitably 1989 Cook v Ochsner in a belated coda to Simkins v Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital a District Court approved a settlement ending a New Orleans hospital s discrimination in emergency room treatment and patient admissions The settlement also provided increased opportunities for African American physicians to practice at the hospital 1990s edit 1990 Missouri v Jenkins established that a federal court could order local tax increases to fund magnet schools as a part of a school desegregation order 1991 Chisom v Roemer and Houston Lawyers Association v Attorney General established that Voting Rights Act applies to the election of judges 1991 Board of Education of Oklahoma City v Dowell established the standard for resolving longstanding school desegregation orders 1992 Matthews v Coye and Thompson v Raiford compelled California and Texas respectively to enforce and implement federal regulations calling for testing of poor children for lead poisoning 1993 Haynes v Shoney s A record court approved settlement in an employment discrimination case Shoney s Restaurants agreed to pay African American employees applicants and white managers who resisted the practices 105 million and to implement aggressive equal employment opportunity measures 11 1994 Lawson v City of Los Angeles and Silva v City of Los Angeles led to settlements to end discriminatory use of police dogs in minority neighborhoods 1995 McKennon v Nashville Banner The Supreme Court refused to allow employers to defeat otherwise valid claims of job discrimination by relying on facts they did not know until after the discriminatory decision had been made 1996 Sheff v O Neill The Supreme Court of Connecticut in view of the disparities between Hartford public schools and schools in the surrounding suburbs found the state liable for maintaining racial and ethnic isolation and ordered the legislative and executive branches to propose a remedy 1997 Robinson v Shell Oil Company determined that a former employee may sue his ex employer for retaliating against him by giving a bad job reference after he filed discrimination charges over his termination 1998 Wright v Universal Maritime Service Corp determined that a general arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement did not deprive an employee of his right to enforce federal anti discrimination laws in federal court 1999 Campaign to Save Our Public Hospitals v Giuliani barred New York City mayor Rudolph Giuliani s attempt to privatize public hospitals 2000s edit 2000 Rideau v Whitley the U S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit threw out the 28 year old third conviction of Wilbert Rideau for murder because of discrimination in the composition of the Grand Jury that originally indicted him more than 40 years earlier Rideau was retried convicted on the lesser charge of manslaughter and released in 2005 2000 Smith v United States was resolved when President Clinton commuted the sentence of Kemba Smith Smith was a young African American mother whose abusive domineering boyfriend led her to play a peripheral role she did not sell drugs but was aware of the selling in a conspiracy to obtain and distribute crack cocaine She had been sentenced to a mandatory minimum of 24 1 2 years in prison even though she was a first time offender 2000 Cromartie v Hunt and Daly v Hunt ruled that it is legal to create for partisan political reasons a district with a high concentration of minority voters hence the North Carolina district from which Mel Watt was elected to the House of Representatives was ruled not to be an illegal gerrymander 2003 Gratz v Bollinger ordered the University of Michigan to change admission policies by removing racial quotas in the form of points but allowed them to continue to utilize race as a factor in admissions to admit a diverse entering class of students 2007 Parents Involved in Community Schools v Seattle School District No 1 the Supreme Court ruled racial quotas unconstitutional in PK 12 school assignment but allowed other remedial school integration programs to continue 12 2009 Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No 1 v Holder the Supreme Court ruled the Voting Rights Act Section 5 preclearance process constitutional LDF presented oral argument at the Supreme Court on behalf of a group of African American voters 13 2010s edit 2010 Lewis v City of Chicago the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the City of Chicago can be held accountable for each and every time it used a hiring practice that arbitrarily blocked qualified minority applicants from employment LDF presented oral argument in this case in the Supreme Court 14 2013 Shelby County v Holder the Supreme Court struck down Section 4 b of the Voting Rights Act ending the Section 5 preclearance regime LDF presented oral argument and represented a group of African American voters in the Supreme Court 15 2013 Fisher v University of Texas the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action and remanded the case to the U S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for a second view LDF represented the Black Student Alliance and the Black Ex Students of Texas Inc 10 2014 Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Michigan s Proposal 2 voter initiative which amended the state s constitution to make affirmative action illegal in public employment public education or public contracting purposes LDF represented the Plaintiffs challenging Proposal 2 10 2016 Fisher v University of Texas II Following the remand to the U S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit the Supreme Court again upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action LDF represented the Black Student Alliance and the Black Ex Students of Texas Inc in oral argument before the U S Court of Appeals and in an amicus brief in the Supreme Court 16 2016 Veasey v Abbott The U S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc held that Texas s 2011 voter photo identification law violated the Voting Rights Act and that there was sufficient evidence to find that the Texas Legislature might have passed the law for the purpose of discriminating against Black and Latino voters LDF presented oral argument in the Fifth Circuit on behalf of Black students and the Texas League of Young Voters 17 2017 Buck v Davis the Supreme Court reversed the death sentence of Mr Duane Buck because Mr Buck s trial attorney introduced evidence that suggested Mr Buck was more likely to commit violent acts in the future because he is black LDF represented and presented oral argument on Mr Buck s behalf in the Supreme Court 10 2018 Stout v Jefferson County Board of Education and Gardendale Board of Education The U S Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit blocked the City of Gardendale s attempt to secede from the larger Jefferson County school system because Gardendale s purpose was to create a mostly white school system separate from the more racially diverse Jefferson County schools LDF represents and presented oral arguments on behalf of Black students opposed to the separation 18 2020s edit 2020 LDF v Barr the U S District Court for the District of Columbia granted summary judgment to LDF and ruled that the Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice violated multiple requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act halting the Commission s operations until it was brought into compliance with federal law 19 2020 Harding v Edwards in September 2020 the U S District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana granted a preliminary injunction that required Louisiana to extend the early voting period by three days and provided voters at highest risk of serious illness from COVID 19 with the option to vote by mail in the November and December 2020 primary and general elections 20 2020 Thomas v Andino in May 2020 the U S District Court for the District of South Carolina granted a preliminary junction that prohibited South Carolina from enforcing its witness signature requirement for absentee voters in the June 2020 primary elections The court found that forcing people to obtain the signature of a third party witness on their absentee ballot would endanger their health and safety in light of the COVID 19 pandemic 21 2020 NAACP v United States Postal Service the U S District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the US Postal Service s widespread disruptions in mail delivery violated federal law and risked delaying the delivery of mail in ballots thereby causing voter disenfranchisement On October 10 2020 the court granted a preliminary injunction motion suspending service changes that had disrupted mail delivery The court issued a series of additional orders leading up to the November 2020 General Election which required the US Postal Service to take extraordinary measures to ensure the timely delivery of ballots and to provide daily updates about the delivery status of mail in ballots LDF represented the NAACP and individuals in the litigation 22 2023 Allen v Milligan on June 8 2023 the U S Supreme Court affirmed a preliminary injunction against the State of Alabama s 2021 congressional districts and ruled that Alabama s map is racially discriminatory in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act The Supreme Court also upheld the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act in the redistricting context LDF represented Milligan plaintiffs in the lower courts and presented oral argument on behalf of the Milligan appellees in the Supreme Court 2024 Robinson v Ardoin On June 6 2022 the middle district of Louisiana issued a preliminary injunction against Louisiana s congressional map which contained one majority minority district out of six districts despite Louisiana having a black population of about 30 While the U S Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit declined to stay the ruling on June 28 2022 the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari before judgment and stayed the case pending the outcome of Milligan After the Milligan decision on June 26 2023 the Supreme Court dismissed Louisiana s appeal and ordered the case to be resolved in the lower courts in advance of the 2024 elections After further review on November 10 2023 the Fifth Circuit agreed that Louisiana likely violated the Voting Rights Act and ruled that the Louisiana state legislature must draw a new fair map by January 15 2024 or the district court would proceed with trial on the Voting Rights Act claims in early 2024 On January 19 2024 the Louisiana Legislature responded by drawing a new congressional map that added a second majority Black district LDF represented the Robinson plaintiffs in the Supreme Court and lower courts 2024 Alexander v South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP on January 6 2023 a three judge district court ruled against the State of South Carolina s 2021 congressional map and concluded that the map is an unconstitutional racial gerrymander and intentionally discriminatory in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments The Supreme Court took the case up on direct appeal and heard oral arguments on October 11 2023 LDF represented the plaintiffs at trial and presented oral argument on their behalf in the Supreme Court Prominent LDF alumni editA number of prominent attorneys have been affiliated with LDF over the years including Barack Obama who was an LDF cooperating attorney 1 The following non exhaustive list of LDF alumni demonstrates the breadth of positions these attorneys have held or currently hold in public service the government academia the private sector and other areas Debo Adegbile former acting President Director Counsel for LDF 2012 2013 argued twice in the U S Supreme Court in defense of the constitutionality of the Voting Rights Act and a current Commissioner for the United States Civil Rights Commission Derrick A Bell Jr the first tenured African American Harvard Law School professor professor at New York University School of Law and preeminent Critical Race Theorist Victor Allen Bolden a federal judge in the U S District Court for the District of Connecticut Jacqueline A Berrien chair of the U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission appointed by President Obama and confirmed by the Senate on December 22 2010 Immediately prior to her appointment Ms Berrien was the Director of Litigation and Associate Director Counsel for LDF 23 Jocelyn Benson is the Secretary of State of Michigan She is also the former Dean of Wayne State University Law School She was a summer legal intern at LDF 24 Robert L Carter an assistant counsel at LDF until its 1956 separation from the NAACP and an architect of Brown v Board After the separation he replaced Thurgood Marshall as the General Counsel for the NAACP He won numerous cases at the Supreme Court and was a federal judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 25 Julius L Chambers third director counsel of LDF He argued Swann v Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Education which upheld the constitutionality of busing to achieve school desegregation Kristen Clarke the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division since 2021 and former President of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law She previously headed the Civil Rights bureau of the New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman U W Clemon first African American federal judge in Alabama retired from the U S District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and one of the first Black officials elected to the Alabama Senate in modern times William Thaddeus Coleman Jr President emeritus of LDF s board and Secretary of Transportation in the administration of President Gerald Ford Drew S Days III the first African American Assistant Attorney General for the United States Department of Justice s Civil Rights Division and the United States Solicitor General from 1993 to 1996 Marian Wright Edelman founder of the Children s Defense Fund During the Mississippi Freedom Summer she headed LDF s Jackson Mississippi office and handled more than 120 cases 26 Jean E Fairfax organizer educator creator of the division of legal information and community service and director of that division from 1965 to 1984 Jack Greenberg succeeded Thurgood Marshall and served as LDF s second director counsel from 1961 to 1984 Greenberg began as an Assistant Counsel at LDF in 1949 He argued more than 40 of LDF s cases before the Supreme Court including a portion of Brown v Board While he was director counsel LDF successfully defended the civil rights movement ended all deliberate speed in desegregation 27 the first employment discrimination lawsuits in the Supreme Court and brought about a national moratorium on the death penalty After leaving the LDF Greenberg was a professor at Columbia Law School and the former Dean of Columbia College Lani Guinier voting rights advocate and the first African American woman tenured professor at Harvard Law Vanita Gupta the Associate Attorney General of the United States since April 2021 She was formerly the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and acting head of the Civil Rights Division at the U S Department of Justice from October 2014 until January 2017 Dale Ho a federal judge on the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Eric Holder the first African American United States Attorney General Holder was a member of LDF s Board of Directors and interned for LDF as a law student 28 Elaine Jones successfully argued Furman v Georgia LDF s fourth director counsel and the first female director counsel 29 Pamela S Karlan Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division at the U S Department of Justice since January 2021 and the Kenneth and Harle Montgomery Professor of Public Interest Law at Stanford Law School She is frequently mentioned as a potential democratic appointee to the U S Supreme Court 30 David E Kendall a partner at Williams amp Connolly LLP he represented President Bill Clinton during the President s impeachment proceedings He is a former LDF staff attorney and currently a member of its board of directors 31 Bill Lann Lee the first Chinese American Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division 32 Thurgood Marshall LDF founder and the first African American Supreme Court Justice Marshall left LDF in 1961 to become a judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit before going on to become Solicitor General of the United States and Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court Gabrielle Kirk McDonald a former federal judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and a former judge of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia McDonald was one of the first eleven judges elected by the United Nations to serve on the Yugoslav Tribunal and became its president between 1997 and 1999 Natasha C Merle a federal judge for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York Constance Baker Motley the first African American woman to be appointed a Federal Court Judge and the first to argue before the Supreme Court James Nabrit III was an LDF attorney from 1959 1989 Dennis Parker the executive director of the National Center for Law and Economic Justice He formerly was the Chief of the Civil Rights Bureau in the office of the New York Attorney General and prior to that worked for over a dozen years at LDF 33 Deval Patrick the first African American Governor of Massachusetts and only the second African American to be elected governor of any state Cornelia Pillard a federal judge on the U S Court of Appeals for the D C Circuit Reince Priebus served as White House Chief of Staff for President Donald Trump in 2017 He also served as the chairman of the Republican National Committee from 2011 to 2017 He interned for LDF as a law student 34 Constance L Rice civil rights activist and founder of the Advancement Project Spottswood William Robinson III the first African American appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Theodore Shaw Julius L Chambers Distinguished Professor of Law and Director of the Center for Civil Rights at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Professor Shaw served as the fifth president and director counsel 1 35 36 37 38 Christina Swarns the Executive Director of the Innocence Project She previously served as the director of litigation for LDF and in that role argued and won Buck v Davis in the U S Supreme Court She is one of the few African American women to have ever argued a case in the Supreme Court 39 Holly A Thomas a federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Maya Wiley an MSNBC Legal Analyst civil rights activist lawyer and 2021 mayoral candidate for New York City 40 and the Henry Cohen Professor of Urban Policy and Management at The New School Wiley is also the former board chair 41 of the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board and former counsel to the Mayor of New York City Bill de Blasio References edit a b c d e f g Transformative History of the NAACP Legal Defense amp Educational Fund NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved June 3 2019 LDF 70 70 Years of Fulfilling the Promise of Equality PDF Retrieved November 19 2010 a b c d NAACP v NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc 753 F 2d 131 D C Circuit 1985 Retrieved November 19 2010 Introducing LDF s New President and Director Counsel Janai Nelson NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved April 28 2022 History NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved November 13 2018 a b Bush v Orleans Parish School Board and the Desegregation of New Orleans Schools History of the Federal Judiciary Federal Judicial Center Archived from the original on February 21 2014 a b Hooks 1979 Tarter Brent Aline Elizabeth Black 1906 1974 Encyclopedia Virginia Retrieved August 24 2015 A Timeline of LDF s over 75 Year History of Defending Voting Rights in Alabama PDF archived from the original PDF on July 6 2020 a b c d NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved June 3 2019 Haynes v Shoney s 803 F Supp 393 N D Fla March 12 1992 Haynes v Shoney s WL 19915 N D Fla January 25 1993 Notice of proposed class action settlement and consent decree legal advertisement The Times Munster Indiana November 25 1992 p C5 Retrieved April 15 2018 via Newspapers com nbsp Kaczor Bill January 26 1993 Judge approves racial discrimination settlement Tallahassee Democrat p 7B Retrieved April 15 2018 via Newspapers com nbsp http www naacpldf org timeline aspx The official site provides a Flash based history of the major cases taken on by LDF This article has taken extensive portions of this page with the permission of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc the copyright holder of that material Supreme Court Ruling Leaves in Place Core Provision of the Voting Rights Act NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved October 25 2018 NAACP Legal Defense Fund Succeeds in Defending Rights of 6 000 African American Applicants for Chicago Firefighter Jobs NAACP LDF Archived from the original on November 27 2010 Shelby County Alabama v Holder NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved October 25 2018 U S Supreme Court Ruling Reaffirms the Importance of Diversity in College Admissions NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved June 3 2019 LDF Applauds Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc Decision Finding Texas Voter ID Law Discriminatory NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved October 25 2018 LDF Applauds Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals En Banc Decision Finding Texas Voter ID Law Discriminatory NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved June 3 2019 LDF v Barr NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved October 1 2020 Harding v Ewards NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved May 4 2022 Thomas v Andino NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved October 1 2020 LDF Files Agreement Requiring USPS to Implement Key Measures to Prioritize and Expedite Ballot Delivery in Georgia Runoff Election NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Retrieved December 24 2020 U S Senate Confirms EEOC Chair Two Commissioners and General Counsel www eeoc gov Retrieved October 25 2018 Shechet Ellie November 2 2018 The Most Important Midterm Race is One You Haven t Heard About Vice Retrieved June 3 2019 Robert L Carter Mississippi Freedom Summer Alexander v Holmes County Board of Education Green v County School Board of New Kent County Eric Holder In Profile Washington Post November 18 2008 1997 Elaine Jones Archived 2009 05 15 at the Wayback Machine The New York Times Search topics nytimes com Retrieved October 25 2018 David Kendall Williams amp Connolly LLP www wc com Retrieved October 25 2018 Holmes Steven A June 12 1997 Asian American Is Named To Top Civil Rights Position The New York Times Retrieved October 25 2018 Dennis D Parker National Center for Law and Economic Justice Weigel David August 22 2012 Reince Priebus The Least Interesting Man in the World Slate ISSN 1091 2339 Retrieved October 25 2018 Theodore M Shaw www law unc edu Retrieved October 25 2018 LDF President Ted Shaw Joins Columbia Law Faculty Columbia Law School Retrieved October 25 2018 Columbia Law School Full Time Faculty Theodore M Shaw Law columbia edu November 9 1961 Archived from the original on July 28 2010 Retrieved December 9 2010 NAACP s Theodore Shaw to Discuss The Continuing Struggle for Racial Justice Office of Communications Retrieved October 25 2018 Meet the people behind the Innocence Project MSNBC Public Relations on Twitter Twitter Retrieved August 27 2018 Mueller Benjamin August 31 2017 Chairwoman Steps Down at New York City Police Oversight Agency The New York Times Further reading editClemon U W and Bryan K Fair Making Bricks Without Straw The NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the Development of Civil Rights Law in Alabama 1940 1980 Alabama Law Review 52 2000 1121 onlineGreenberg Jack Crusaders in the Courts Legal Battles of the Civil Rights Movement 2004 Hooks Benjamin L Birth and Separation of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Crisis 1979 86 6 218 220 0011 1422 King Gilbert Devil in the Grove Thurgood Marshall the Groveland Boys and the Dawn of a New America 2012 Pulitzer Prize excerptKlinetobe Charles Jury Trials and Gerrymanders The Legal Effort to Maintain Segregation in July of 1957 The Historian 68 2 2006 221 240 https doi org 10 1111 j 1540 6563 2006 00141 x Mosnier L Joseph Crafting Law in the Second Reconstruction Julius Chambers the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and Title VII 2005 Tauber Steven C The NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the U S Supreme Court s Racial Discrimination Decision Making Social Science Quarterly 1999 80 2 325 340 Tauber Steven C On Behalf of the Condemned The Impact of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund on Capital Punishment Decision Making in the U S Courts of Appeals Political Research Quarterly 1998 51 1 191 219 Tushnet Mark V Making Civil Rights Law Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court 1936 1961 1994 Ware Gilbert The NAACP Inc Fund Alliance Its Strategy Power and Destruction Journal of Negro Education 1994 63 3 323 335 in JSTOR Watkins Steve The Black O Racism and Redemption in an American Corporate Empire 2013 specific to the 1993 Haynes v Shoney s case portions in Google BooksExternal links editNAACP LDF Official Website Thurgood Marshall Institute at LDF Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund amp oldid 1197907316, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.