fbpx
Wikipedia

Marco Antonio de Dominis

Marco Antonio de Dominis (Croatian: Markantun de Dominis; 1560 – 7 September 1624) was a Dalmatian ecclesiastic, archbishop of Split and Primate of Dalmatia and all Croatia, adjudged heretic of the Catholic faith, polymath and man of science.


Markantun de Dominis
Marco Antonio de Dominis
Archbishop of Split
Primate of Dalmatia and all Croatia
Portrait from De Republica Ecclesiastica (1610)
ChurchRoman Catholic
ArchdioceseSplit
SeeSplit
Appointed15 November 1602
In office1602–1616
PredecessorIvan Dominik Marcot
SuccessorSfortia Ponzoni
Other post(s)Bishop of Senj (1600–1602)
Dean of Windsor (1619–1622)
Orders
ConsecrationOctober 1600
Personal details
Born
Marco Antonio De Dominis

1560
Died7 September 1624 (aged 64)
Rome, Papal States
Styles of
Markantun de Dominis
Reference styleThe Most Reverend
Spoken styleYour Excellency
Religious styleArchbishop
Primate

Early life edit

He was born on the island of Rab[1] (today part of Croatia), off the coast of Dalmatia, in a noble family of Dalmatian origin.[a] Educated at the Illyrian College at Loreto and at the University of Padua, he entered the Society of Jesus in 1579 and taught mathematics, logic, and rhetoric at Padua and Brescia, Italy.

He was educated by the Jesuits in their colleges at Loreto and Padua, and is supposed by some to have joined the Society; the more usual opinion, however, is that he was dissuaded from doing so by Cardinal Aldobrandini. For some time he was employed as a teacher at Verona, a professor of mathematics at Padua, and a professor of rhetoric and philosophy at Brescia.[3]

Religious politics edit

In 1596 he was, through imperial influence, appointed Bishop of Senj and Modruš in Croatia in August 1600, and transferred in November 1602 to the archiepiscopal see of Split. His endeavors to reform the church soon brought him into conflict with his suffragans; and the interference of the papal court with his rights as metropolitan, an attitude intensified by the quarrel between the Papacy and Venice, made his position intolerable. This, at any rate, is the account given in his own apology, the Consilium profectionis in which he also states that it was these troubles that led him to those researches into ecclesiastical law, church history, and dogmatic theology, which, while confirming him in his love for the ideal of the true Catholic Church, convinced him that the papal system was far from approximating to it.[3]

He sided with Venice, in whose territory his diocese was situated, during the quarrel between Pope Paul V and the Republic (1606–7). That fact, combined with a correspondence with Paolo Sarpi and conflicts with his clergy and fellow bishops, which culminated in the loss of an important financial case in the Roman Curia, led to the resignation of his office in favor of a relative and his retirement to Venice.

To England edit

Threatened by the Inquisition, he prepared to apostatize, entered into communication with the English ambassador to Venice, Sir Henry Wotton, and having been assured of a welcome, left for England in 1616.

On his way there, he published at Heidelberg a violent attack on Rome: Scogli del Christiano naufragio, afterwards reprinted in England. He was received with open arms by James I, who quartered him upon Archbishop Abbot of Canterbury, called on the other bishops to pay him a pension, and granted him precedence after the Archbishops of Canterbury and York. De Dominis wrote a number of anti-Roman sermons, published his often reprinted chief work, De Republicâ Ecclesiasticâ contra Primatum Papæ (Vol. 1, 1617; vol. II, 1620, London; Vol. III, 1622, Hanau), and took part, as assistant, in the consecration of George Montaigne as Bishop of Lincoln, and Nicolas Felton as Bishop of Bristol on 14 December 1617. In that same year, James I made him Dean of Windsor and granted him the Mastership of the Savoy.

Contemporary writers give no pleasant account of him, describing him as fat, irascible, pretentious and very avaricious; but his ability was undoubted, and in the theological controversies of the time he soon took a foremost place. His published attacks on the papacy succeeded each other in rapid succession: the Papatus Romanus, issued anonymously (London, 1617; Frankfort, 1618); the Scogli del naufragio Christiano, written in Switzerland (London, (?) 1618), of which English, French and German translations also appeared; and a Sermon preached in Italian before the king.[3]

But his principal work was the De republica ecclesiastica, of which the first part after revision by Anglican theologians was published under royal patronage in London (1617), in which he set forth with a great display of erudition his theory of the church. In the main it is an elaborate treatise on the historic organization of the church, its principal note being its insistence on the divine prerogatives of the Catholic episcopate as against the encroachments of the papal monarchy. In 1619 Dominis published in London from a manuscript Paolo Sarpi's Historia del Concilio Tridentino.[3] This history of the Council of Trent appeared in Italian, with an anti-Roman title page and letter dedicatory to James I. The manuscript had been obtained from Sarpi for George Abbot by his agent Nathaniel Brent.[4]

His vanity, avarice, and irascibility soon lost him his English friends; the projected Spanish marriage of Prince Charles made him anxious about the security of his position in England, and the election of Pope Gregory XV (9 February 1621) furnished him with an occasion of intimating, through Catholic diplomatists in England, his wish to return to Rome.

The king's anger was aroused when De Dominis announced his intention (16 January 1622), and Star-Chamber proceedings for illegal correspondence with Rome were threatened. Eventually he was allowed to depart, but his chests of hoarded money were seized by the king's men, and only restored in response to a piteous personal appeal to the king.

Return to Rome edit

Once out of England, his attacks upon the English Church were as violent as had been those on the Papacy, and in Sui Reditus ex Anglia Consilium (Paris, 1623) he recanted all he had written in his Consilium Profectionis (London, 1616), declaring that he had deliberately lied in all that he had said against Rome. After a stay of six months in Brussels he proceeded to Rome, where he lived on a pension assigned him by the Pope. On the death of Pope Gregory XV on 8 July 1623 the pension ceased, and irritation loosened his tongue.

Coming into conflict with the Inquisition he was declared a relapsed heretic and was confined to the Castel Sant'Angelo. He there died a natural death in September 1624.[5]

Even his death did not end his trial. His case was continued after his death, and on 20 December 1624 judgment was pronounced over his corpse in the Church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva. His heresy was declared manifest, and by order of the Inquisition his body was taken from the coffin, dragged through the streets of Rome, and publicly burned in the Campo di Fiore together with his works, on 21 December 1624.[6]

By a strange irony, the publication of his Reditus consilium was subsequently forbidden in Venice because of its uncompromising advocacy of the supremacy of the Pope over the temporal powers. As a theologian and an ecclesiastic Dominis was thoroughly discredited; as a man of science he was more happy.[3]

Scientific work edit

 
From theory of the rainbow

In 1611 he published, at Venice, a scientific work entitled: Tractatus de radiis visus et lucis in vitris, perspectivis et iride, in which, according to Isaac Newton, he was the first to develop the theory of the rainbow by drawing attention to the fact that in each raindrop the light undergoes two refractions and an intermediate reflection. His claim to that distinction is, however, disputed in favor of Descartes.

In 1625 his work "Euripus, seu de fluxu et refluxu maris sententia" was published posthumously in Rome. It is an important source for the strange story of the theory of tides. It contains an exact but qualitative, luni-solar explanation of the phaenomena. This explanation is directly connected with the later developments.[7]

Representations edit

De Dominis was caricatured in Thomas Middleton's 1624 play A Game at Chess. He is portrayed as the cynical 'Fat Bishop of Spalato' who changes faiths as much as it suits him.

See also edit

Explanatory notes edit

  1. ^ In one of letters written by Fulgenzio Micanzio addressed to William Cavendish, 1st Earl of Devonshire and translated by Thomas Hobbes, Micanzio introduced De Dominis to William Cavendish as a man born in a noble Dalmatian family: "He was born of a principall family of a Dalmatia called in that tongue Domnianich which we would call De Dominis".[2]

References edit

  1. ^ "A Field Guide to the English Clergy' Butler-Gallie, F p144: London, Oneworld Publications, 2018 ISBN 9781786074416
  2. ^ Devonshire Collections, Chatsworth, Hobbes group, Translation of Italian Letters (73Aa)
  3. ^ a b c d e   One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Dominis, Marco Antonio de". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 403–404.
  4. ^ Patterson, WB (1997), King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom, p. 247.
  5. ^ "Ifrån Room then 7. dato". Hermes Gothicus (in Swedish). p. 26.
  6. ^ Chisholm 1911.
  7. ^ Bonelli, Federico; Russo, Lucio (1996), "Crisogono, De Dominis and the Origins of the Modern Theory of the Tides", British Journal for the History of Science, 29, Cambridge University Press: 385–401, doi:10.1017/s0007087400034713, S2CID 144963471.

Sources edit

  •   This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainHerbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Marco Antonio de Dominis". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.

Further reading edit

  • Benrath, Karl (1898), Herzog-Hauck (ed.), Realencyklopdie, vol. iv, p. 781, where a full bibliography is given.
  • Newland, Henry Garrett (1859), Life and Contemporaneous Church History of Antonio de Dominis, Oxford{{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link).

External links edit

  • Perry, George Gresley (1888). "Dominis, Marco Antonio de" . In Stephen, Leslie (ed.). Dictionary of National Biography. Vol. 15. London: Smith, Elder & Co.
  • "Dominis, Marco Anton De (DMNS617MA)". A Cambridge Alumni Database. University of Cambridge.
  • De Dominis's (1611) De radiis visus et lucis in vitris perspectivis et iride – digital facsimile from the Linda Hall Library
  • Markantun de Dominis in Croatian encyclopaedias and lexicons
  • Markantun de Dominis in French lexicographic editions and libraries in the 17th century

marco, antonio, dominis, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor, 20. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Marco Antonio de Dominis news newspapers books scholar JSTOR May 2014 Learn how and when to remove this message Marco Antonio de Dominis Croatian Markantun de Dominis 1560 7 September 1624 was a Dalmatian ecclesiastic archbishop of Split and Primate of Dalmatia and all Croatia adjudged heretic of the Catholic faith polymath and man of science The Most ReverendMarkantun de DominisMarco Antonio de DominisArchbishop of SplitPrimate of Dalmatia and all CroatiaPortrait from De Republica Ecclesiastica 1610 ChurchRoman CatholicArchdioceseSplitSeeSplitAppointed15 November 1602In office1602 1616PredecessorIvan Dominik MarcotSuccessorSfortia PonzoniOther post s Bishop of Senj 1600 1602 Dean of Windsor 1619 1622 OrdersConsecrationOctober 1600Personal detailsBornMarco Antonio De Dominis1560Rab CroatiaDied7 September 1624 aged 64 Rome Papal States Styles of Markantun de DominisReference styleThe Most ReverendSpoken styleYour ExcellencyReligious styleArchbishopPrimate Contents 1 Early life 2 Religious politics 3 To England 4 Return to Rome 5 Scientific work 6 Representations 7 See also 8 Explanatory notes 9 References 10 Sources 11 Further reading 12 External linksEarly life editHe was born on the island of Rab 1 today part of Croatia off the coast of Dalmatia in a noble family of Dalmatian origin a Educated at the Illyrian College at Loreto and at the University of Padua he entered the Society of Jesus in 1579 and taught mathematics logic and rhetoric at Padua and Brescia Italy He was educated by the Jesuits in their colleges at Loreto and Padua and is supposed by some to have joined the Society the more usual opinion however is that he was dissuaded from doing so by Cardinal Aldobrandini For some time he was employed as a teacher at Verona a professor of mathematics at Padua and a professor of rhetoric and philosophy at Brescia 3 Religious politics editIn 1596 he was through imperial influence appointed Bishop of Senj and Modrus in Croatia in August 1600 and transferred in November 1602 to the archiepiscopal see of Split His endeavors to reform the church soon brought him into conflict with his suffragans and the interference of the papal court with his rights as metropolitan an attitude intensified by the quarrel between the Papacy and Venice made his position intolerable This at any rate is the account given in his own apology the Consilium profectionis in which he also states that it was these troubles that led him to those researches into ecclesiastical law church history and dogmatic theology which while confirming him in his love for the ideal of the true Catholic Church convinced him that the papal system was far from approximating to it 3 He sided with Venice in whose territory his diocese was situated during the quarrel between Pope Paul V and the Republic 1606 7 That fact combined with a correspondence with Paolo Sarpi and conflicts with his clergy and fellow bishops which culminated in the loss of an important financial case in the Roman Curia led to the resignation of his office in favor of a relative and his retirement to Venice To England editThreatened by the Inquisition he prepared to apostatize entered into communication with the English ambassador to Venice Sir Henry Wotton and having been assured of a welcome left for England in 1616 On his way there he published at Heidelberg a violent attack on Rome Scogli del Christiano naufragio afterwards reprinted in England He was received with open arms by James I who quartered him upon Archbishop Abbot of Canterbury called on the other bishops to pay him a pension and granted him precedence after the Archbishops of Canterbury and York De Dominis wrote a number of anti Roman sermons published his often reprinted chief work De Republica Ecclesiastica contra Primatum Papae Vol 1 1617 vol II 1620 London Vol III 1622 Hanau and took part as assistant in the consecration of George Montaigne as Bishop of Lincoln and Nicolas Felton as Bishop of Bristol on 14 December 1617 In that same year James I made him Dean of Windsor and granted him the Mastership of the Savoy Contemporary writers give no pleasant account of him describing him as fat irascible pretentious and very avaricious but his ability was undoubted and in the theological controversies of the time he soon took a foremost place His published attacks on the papacy succeeded each other in rapid succession the Papatus Romanus issued anonymously London 1617 Frankfort 1618 the Scogli del naufragio Christiano written in Switzerland London 1618 of which English French and German translations also appeared and a Sermon preached in Italian before the king 3 But his principal work was the De republica ecclesiastica of which the first part after revision by Anglican theologians was published under royal patronage in London 1617 in which he set forth with a great display of erudition his theory of the church In the main it is an elaborate treatise on the historic organization of the church its principal note being its insistence on the divine prerogatives of the Catholic episcopate as against the encroachments of the papal monarchy In 1619 Dominis published in London from a manuscript Paolo Sarpi s Historia del Concilio Tridentino 3 This history of the Council of Trent appeared in Italian with an anti Roman title page and letter dedicatory to James I The manuscript had been obtained from Sarpi for George Abbot by his agent Nathaniel Brent 4 His vanity avarice and irascibility soon lost him his English friends the projected Spanish marriage of Prince Charles made him anxious about the security of his position in England and the election of Pope Gregory XV 9 February 1621 furnished him with an occasion of intimating through Catholic diplomatists in England his wish to return to Rome The king s anger was aroused when De Dominis announced his intention 16 January 1622 and Star Chamber proceedings for illegal correspondence with Rome were threatened Eventually he was allowed to depart but his chests of hoarded money were seized by the king s men and only restored in response to a piteous personal appeal to the king Return to Rome editOnce out of England his attacks upon the English Church were as violent as had been those on the Papacy and in Sui Reditus ex Anglia Consilium Paris 1623 he recanted all he had written in his Consilium Profectionis London 1616 declaring that he had deliberately lied in all that he had said against Rome After a stay of six months in Brussels he proceeded to Rome where he lived on a pension assigned him by the Pope On the death of Pope Gregory XV on 8 July 1623 the pension ceased and irritation loosened his tongue Coming into conflict with the Inquisition he was declared a relapsed heretic and was confined to the Castel Sant Angelo He there died a natural death in September 1624 5 Even his death did not end his trial His case was continued after his death and on 20 December 1624 judgment was pronounced over his corpse in the Church of Santa Maria sopra Minerva His heresy was declared manifest and by order of the Inquisition his body was taken from the coffin dragged through the streets of Rome and publicly burned in the Campo di Fiore together with his works on 21 December 1624 6 By a strange irony the publication of his Reditus consilium was subsequently forbidden in Venice because of its uncompromising advocacy of the supremacy of the Pope over the temporal powers As a theologian and an ecclesiastic Dominis was thoroughly discredited as a man of science he was more happy 3 Scientific work edit nbsp From theory of the rainbow In 1611 he published at Venice a scientific work entitled Tractatus de radiis visus et lucis in vitris perspectivis et iride in which according to Isaac Newton he was the first to develop the theory of the rainbow by drawing attention to the fact that in each raindrop the light undergoes two refractions and an intermediate reflection His claim to that distinction is however disputed in favor of Descartes In 1625 his work Euripus seu de fluxu et refluxu maris sententia was published posthumously in Rome It is an important source for the strange story of the theory of tides It contains an exact but qualitative luni solar explanation of the phaenomena This explanation is directly connected with the later developments 7 Representations editDe Dominis was caricatured in Thomas Middleton s 1624 play A Game at Chess He is portrayed as the cynical Fat Bishop of Spalato who changes faiths as much as it suits him See also editIn necessariis unitas in dubiis libertas in omnibus caritasExplanatory notes edit In one of letters written by Fulgenzio Micanzio addressed to William Cavendish 1st Earl of Devonshire and translated by Thomas Hobbes Micanzio introduced De Dominis to William Cavendish as a man born in a noble Dalmatian family He was born of a principall family of a Dalmatia called in that tongue Domnianich which we would call De Dominis 2 References edit A Field Guide to the English Clergy Butler Gallie F p144 London Oneworld Publications 2018 ISBN 9781786074416 Devonshire Collections Chatsworth Hobbes group Translation of Italian Letters 73Aa a b c d e nbsp One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain Chisholm Hugh ed 1911 Dominis Marco Antonio de Encyclopaedia Britannica Vol 8 11th ed Cambridge University Press pp 403 404 Patterson WB 1997 King James VI and I and the Reunion of Christendom p 247 Ifran Room then 7 dato Hermes Gothicus in Swedish p 26 Chisholm 1911 Bonelli Federico Russo Lucio 1996 Crisogono De Dominis and the Origins of the Modern Theory of the Tides British Journal for the History of Science 29 Cambridge University Press 385 401 doi 10 1017 s0007087400034713 S2CID 144963471 Sources edit nbsp This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain Herbermann Charles ed 1913 Marco Antonio de Dominis Catholic Encyclopedia New York Robert Appleton Company Further reading editBenrath Karl 1898 Herzog Hauck ed Realencyklopdie vol iv p 781 where a full bibliography is given Newland Henry Garrett 1859 Life and Contemporaneous Church History of Antonio de Dominis Oxford a href Template Citation html title Template Citation citation a CS1 maint location missing publisher link External links edit nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Marco Antonio de Dominis Perry George Gresley 1888 Dominis Marco Antonio de In Stephen Leslie ed Dictionary of National Biography Vol 15 London Smith Elder amp Co Dominis Marco Anton De DMNS617MA A Cambridge Alumni Database University of Cambridge De Dominis s 1611 De radiis visus et lucis in vitris perspectivis et iride digital facsimile from the Linda Hall Library Markantun de Dominis in Croatian encyclopaedias and lexicons Markantun de Dominis in French lexicographic editions and libraries in the 17th century Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Marco Antonio de Dominis amp oldid 1210017354, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.