fbpx
Wikipedia

Floating signifier

A floating signifier (also sometimes referred to as an empty signifier,[1] but Ernesto Laclau separates both concepts) is a signifier without a referent in semiotics and discourse analysis, such as a word that points to no actual object and has no agreed upon meaning. The term open signifier is sometimes used as a synonym due to the empty signifier's nature to "resist the constitution of any unitary meaning" thus enabling its ability to remain open to different meanings in different contexts.[2]

Definition

Claude Lévi-Strauss originated this term,[3] where he identifies terms like mana (magical mystical substance of which the magic is formed)[4] "to represent an undetermined quantity of signification, in itself void of meaning and thus apt to receive any meaning". Daniel Chandler defines the term as "a signifier with a vague, highly variable, unspecifiable or non-existent signified".[5] As such a "floating signifier" may "mean different things to different people: they may stand for many or even any signifieds; they may mean whatever their interpreters want them to mean". Such a floating signifier—which is said to possess "symbolic value zero"—necessarily results to "allow symbolic thought to operate despite the contradiction inherent in it".[6] In Emancipation(s), Ernesto Laclau frames the empty signifier in the context of social interactions. For Laclau, the empty signifier is the hegemonic representative of a collection of various demands, constituting a chain of equivalence whose members are distinguished through a differential logic (as in elements exist only in their differences to one another) but combine through an equivalential one. This chain of unsatisfied demands create an unfulfilled totality, inside of which one signifier subordinates the rest and assumes representation of the rest via a hegemonic process. The signifiers "empty" vs. "floating" are distinct conceptually yet in practice meld as explained by Laclau: "As we can see, the categories of ‘empty’ and ‘floating’ signifiers are structurally different. The first concerns the construction of a popular identity once the presence of a stable frontier is taken for granted; the second tries conceptually to apprehend the logic of the displacements of that frontier."[7] In an interview in December 2013, Laclau clarified the distinction with an example:

 
Solidarity flag displayed at the Monument to the Fallen Shipyard Workers, Gdańsk, Poland

Laclau exemplified an empty signifier with the case of the Solidarność movement led by Lech Walesa at the Lenin shipyards in Gdansk, Poland, in 1980. At the beginning, the demands of this movement were linked to a set of precise demands of the workers of the ship industry. However, they started to be employed in the context in which many other demands in different areas were also articulated. At the end, Solidarność became the signifier of something much broader. When this universality comes about, it cuts off the connection between the signifier and the signified. In the case of Solidarność, in the beginning it had a signifier but then, because the appeal increased too much, the reference to a particular signified was diluted.


A floating signifier is different. It can be connected to different contexts, so the function of meaning therein is fully realized. Even when it is ambiguous, it is not empty. It fluctuates between different forms of articulation in different projects.[8]

Because the signifier moves between projects, it is said not to be empty but floating.[8]

Uses and examples

The Oxford Dictionary of Critical Theory gives the usage example that "Fredric Jameson suggests that the shark in the Jaws series of films is an empty signifier because it is susceptible to multiple and even contradictory interpretations, suggesting that it does not have a specific meaning itself, but functions primarily as a vehicle for absorbing meanings that viewers want to impose upon it."[9]

The notion of floating signifiers can be applied to concepts such as race[10] and gender, as a way of asserting that the word is more concrete than the concept it describes, where the concept may not be stable, but the word is. It is often applied to non-linguistic signs, such as the example of the Rorschach inkblot test. Roland Barthes, while not using the term "floating signifier" explicitly, referred specifically to non-linguistic signs as being so open to interpretation that they constituted a "floating chain of signifieds."[5] For example, the American flag is at once a signifier of the geographical nation it represents, of patriotism to that nation, of the nation's set of governmental policies or of the ideologies associated with it such as liberty. Depending on the context, the flag can carry either positive or negative significance.

The concept is used in some more textual forms of postmodernism, which rejects the strict anchoring of particular signifiers to particular signifieds and argues against the concept that there are any ultimate determinable meanings to words or signs. For example, Jacques Derrida speaks of the "freeplay" of signifiers: arguing that they are not fixed to their signifieds but point beyond themselves to other signifiers in an "indefinite referral of signifier to signified."[5]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Oxford Reference Overview: floating signifier". Oxford University Press.
  2. ^ Kornak 2015.
  3. ^ Lévi-Strauss (1987), pp. 63–64.
  4. ^ "Oomph definition". Thefreedictionary.com.
  5. ^ a b c Chandler, Daniel. . aber.ac.uk. Archived from the original on 2010-01-04.
  6. ^ Jeffrey Mehlman, The "Floating Signifier": From Lévi-Strauss to Lacan, Yale French Studies, No. 48, French Freud: Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis. (1972), pp. 10–37.
  7. ^ Laclau 2005, p. 133.
  8. ^ a b Moraes 2014.
  9. ^ Buchanan 2018.
  10. ^ "Race: a Floating Signifier? Stuart Hall speech". caffeine_sparks.

Bibliography

  • Buchanan, Ian (2018). A Dictionary of Critical Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780198794790.
  • Kornak, Jacek (2015). "Judith Butler's Queer Conceptual Politics". Redescriptions. 18 (1). doi:10.7227/R.18.1.4.
  • Laclau, Ernesto (2005). On Populist Reason. London/ Brooklyn, NY: Verso. ISBN 978-1-78873-133-1.
  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1987) [1950]. Introduction to Marcel Mauss. Translated by Baker, Felicity. London: Routledge. ISBN 9780710090669.
  • Moraes, Silvia Elisabeth (2014). "Global Citizenship as a Floating Signifier" (PDF). International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning. 6 (2). doi:10.18546/IJDEGL.06.2.03. ISSN 1756-526X. Retrieved April 26, 2021.

External links

  • Semiotics for Beginners: Modality and Representation
  • SBF Glossary

floating, signifier, floating, signifier, also, sometimes, referred, empty, signifier, ernesto, laclau, separates, both, concepts, signifier, without, referent, semiotics, discourse, analysis, such, word, that, points, actual, object, agreed, upon, meaning, te. A floating signifier also sometimes referred to as an empty signifier 1 but Ernesto Laclau separates both concepts is a signifier without a referent in semiotics and discourse analysis such as a word that points to no actual object and has no agreed upon meaning The term open signifier is sometimes used as a synonym due to the empty signifier s nature to resist the constitution of any unitary meaning thus enabling its ability to remain open to different meanings in different contexts 2 Contents 1 Definition 2 Uses and examples 3 See also 4 References 5 Bibliography 6 External linksDefinition EditClaude Levi Strauss originated this term 3 where he identifies terms like mana magical mystical substance of which the magic is formed 4 to represent an undetermined quantity of signification in itself void of meaning and thus apt to receive any meaning Daniel Chandler defines the term as a signifier with a vague highly variable unspecifiable or non existent signified 5 As such a floating signifier may mean different things to different people they may stand for many or even any signifieds they may mean whatever their interpreters want them to mean Such a floating signifier which is said to possess symbolic value zero necessarily results to allow symbolic thought to operate despite the contradiction inherent in it 6 In Emancipation s Ernesto Laclau frames the empty signifier in the context of social interactions For Laclau the empty signifier is the hegemonic representative of a collection of various demands constituting a chain of equivalence whose members are distinguished through a differential logic as in elements exist only in their differences to one another but combine through an equivalential one This chain of unsatisfied demands create an unfulfilled totality inside of which one signifier subordinates the rest and assumes representation of the rest via a hegemonic process The signifiers empty vs floating are distinct conceptually yet in practice meld as explained by Laclau As we can see the categories of empty and floating signifiers are structurally different The first concerns the construction of a popular identity once the presence of a stable frontier is taken for granted the second tries conceptually to apprehend the logic of the displacements of that frontier 7 In an interview in December 2013 Laclau clarified the distinction with an example Solidarity flag displayed at the Monument to the Fallen Shipyard Workers Gdansk Poland Laclau exemplified an empty signifier with the case of the Solidarnosc movement led by Lech Walesa at the Lenin shipyards in Gdansk Poland in 1980 At the beginning the demands of this movement were linked to a set of precise demands of the workers of the ship industry However they started to be employed in the context in which many other demands in different areas were also articulated At the end Solidarnosc became the signifier of something much broader When this universality comes about it cuts off the connection between the signifier and the signified In the case of Solidarnosc in the beginning it had a signifier but then because the appeal increased too much the reference to a particular signified was diluted A floating signifier is different It can be connected to different contexts so the function of meaning therein is fully realized Even when it is ambiguous it is not empty It fluctuates between different forms of articulation in different projects 8 Because the signifier moves between projects it is said not to be empty but floating 8 Uses and examples EditThe Oxford Dictionary of Critical Theory gives the usage example that Fredric Jameson suggests that the shark in the Jaws series of films is an empty signifier because it is susceptible to multiple and even contradictory interpretations suggesting that it does not have a specific meaning itself but functions primarily as a vehicle for absorbing meanings that viewers want to impose upon it 9 The notion of floating signifiers can be applied to concepts such as race 10 and gender as a way of asserting that the word is more concrete than the concept it describes where the concept may not be stable but the word is It is often applied to non linguistic signs such as the example of the Rorschach inkblot test Roland Barthes while not using the term floating signifier explicitly referred specifically to non linguistic signs as being so open to interpretation that they constituted a floating chain of signifieds 5 For example the American flag is at once a signifier of the geographical nation it represents of patriotism to that nation of the nation s set of governmental policies or of the ideologies associated with it such as liberty Depending on the context the flag can carry either positive or negative significance The concept is used in some more textual forms of postmodernism which rejects the strict anchoring of particular signifiers to particular signifieds and argues against the concept that there are any ultimate determinable meanings to words or signs For example Jacques Derrida speaks of the freeplay of signifiers arguing that they are not fixed to their signifieds but point beyond themselves to other signifiers in an indefinite referral of signifier to signified 5 See also EditGlittering generalityReferences Edit Oxford Reference Overview floating signifier Oxford University Press Kornak 2015 Levi Strauss 1987 pp 63 64 Oomph definition Thefreedictionary com a b c Chandler Daniel Semiotics for Beginners aber ac uk Archived from the original on 2010 01 04 Jeffrey Mehlman The Floating Signifier From Levi Strauss to Lacan Yale French Studies No 48 French Freud Structural Studies in Psychoanalysis 1972 pp 10 37 Laclau 2005 p 133 a b Moraes 2014 Buchanan 2018 Race a Floating Signifier Stuart Hall speech caffeine sparks Bibliography EditBuchanan Ian 2018 A Dictionary of Critical Theory Oxford University Press ISBN 9780198794790 Kornak Jacek 2015 Judith Butler s Queer Conceptual Politics Redescriptions 18 1 doi 10 7227 R 18 1 4 Laclau Ernesto 2005 On Populist Reason London Brooklyn NY Verso ISBN 978 1 78873 133 1 Levi Strauss Claude 1987 1950 Introduction to Marcel Mauss Translated by Baker Felicity London Routledge ISBN 9780710090669 Moraes Silvia Elisabeth 2014 Global Citizenship as a Floating Signifier PDF International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning 6 2 doi 10 18546 IJDEGL 06 2 03 ISSN 1756 526X Retrieved April 26 2021 External links EditSemiotics for Beginners Modality and Representation SBF Glossary Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Floating signifier amp oldid 1073392228, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.