fbpx
Wikipedia

Discourse analysis

May 04, 2023

Discourse analysis (DA), or discourse studies, is an approach to the analysis of written, vocal, or sign language use, or any significant semiotic event.

The objects of discourse analysis (discourse, writing, conversation, communicative event) are variously defined in terms of coherent sequences of sentences, propositions, speech, or turns-at-talk. Contrary to much of traditional linguistics, discourse analysts not only study language use 'beyond the sentence boundary' but also prefer to analyze 'naturally occurring' language use, not invented examples.[1] Text linguistics is a closely related field. The essential difference between discourse analysis and text linguistics is that discourse analysis aims at revealing socio-psychological characteristics of a person/persons rather than text structure.[2]

Discourse analysis has been taken up in a variety of disciplines in the humanities and social sciences, including linguistics, education, sociology, anthropology, social work, cognitive psychology, social psychology, area studies, cultural studies, international relations, human geography, environmental science, communication studies, biblical studies, public relations, argumentation studies, and translation studies, each of which is subject to its own assumptions, dimensions of analysis, and methodologies.

History

Early use of the term

The ancient Greeks (among others) had much to say on discourse; however, there is ongoing discussion about whether Austria-born Leo Spitzer's Stilstudien (Style Studies) of 1928 is the earliest example of discourse analysis (DA). Michel Foucault translated it into French.[3] However, the term first came into general use following the publication of a series of papers by Zellig Harris from 1952[citation needed] reporting on work from which he developed transformational grammar in the late 1930s. Formal equivalence relations among the sentences of a coherent discourse are made explicit by using sentence transformations to put the text in a canonical form. Words and sentences with equivalent information then appear in the same column of an array.

This work progressed over the next four decades (see references) into a science of sublanguage analysis (Kittredge & Lehrberger 1982), culminating in a demonstration of the informational structures in texts of a sublanguage of science, that of Immunology, (Harris et al. 1989)[4] and a fully articulated theory of linguistic informational content (Harris 1991).[5] During this time, however, most linguists ignored such developments in favor of a succession of elaborate theories of sentence-level syntax and semantics.[6]

In January 1953, a linguist working for the American Bible Society, James A. Lauriault/Loriot, needed to find answers to some fundamental errors in translating Quechua, in the Cuzco area of Peru. Following Harris's 1952 publications, he worked over the meaning and placement of each word in a collection of Quechua legends with a native speaker of Quechua and was able to formulate discourse rules that transcended the simple sentence structure. He then applied the process to Shipibo, another language of Eastern Peru. He taught the theory at the [7] Summer Institute of Linguistics in Norman, Oklahoma, in the summers of 1956 and 1957 and entered the [8] University of Pennsylvania to study with Harris in the interim year. He tried to publish a paper [9]Shipibo Paragraph Structure, but it was delayed until 1970 (Loriot & Hollenbach 1970).[citation needed] In the meantime, Kenneth Lee Pike, a professor at University of Michigan,[10] Ann Arbor, taught the theory, and one of his students, Robert E. Longacre developed it in his writings. Harris's methodology disclosing the correlation of form with meaning was developed into a system for the computer-aided analysis of natural language by a team led by Naomi Sager at NYU, which has been applied to a number of sublanguage domains, most notably to medical informatics. The software for the Medical Language Processor is publicly available on SourceForge.

In the humanities

In the late 1960s and 1970s, and without reference to this prior work, a variety of other approaches to a new cross-discipline of DA began to develop in most of the humanities and social sciences concurrently with, and related to, other disciplines. These include semiotics, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, and pragmatics. Many of these approaches, especially those influenced by the social sciences, favor a more dynamic study of oral talk-in-interaction. An example is [11]"conversational analysis", which was influenced by the Sociologist Harold Garfinkel,[12] the founder of Ethnomethodology.

Foucault

In Europe, Michel Foucault became one of the key theorists of the subject, especially of discourse, and wrote The Archaeology of Knowledge. In this context, the term 'discourse' no longer refers to formal linguistic aspects, but to institutionalized patterns of knowledge that become manifest in disciplinary structures and operate by the connection of knowledge and power. Since the 1970s, Foucault's works have had an increasing impact especially on discourse analysis in the field of social sciences. Thus, in modern European social sciences, one can find a wide range of different approaches working with Foucault's definition of discourse and his theoretical concepts. Apart from the original context in France, there is, since 2005, a broad discussion on socio-scientific discourse analysis in Germany. Here, for example, the sociologist Reiner Keller developed his widely recognized 'Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD)'.[13] Following the sociology of knowledge by Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann, Keller argues that our sense of reality in everyday life and thus the meaning of every object, action and event is the product of a permanent, routinized interaction. In this context, SKAD has been developed as a scientific perspective that is able to understand the processes of 'The Social Construction of Reality' on all levels of social life by combining the prementioned Michel Foucault's theories of discourse and power while also introducing the theory of knowledge by Berger/Luckmann. Whereas the latter primarily focus on the constitution and stabilization of knowledge on the level of interaction, Foucault's perspective concentrates on institutional contexts of the production and integration of knowledge, where the subject mainly appears to be determined by knowledge and power. Therefore, the 'Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse' can also be seen as an approach to deal with the vividly discussed micro–macro problem in sociology.[citation needed]

Perspectives

The following are some of the specific theoretical perspectives and analytical approaches used in linguistic discourse analysis:

Although these approaches emphasize different aspects of language use, they all view language as social interaction and are concerned with the social contexts in which discourse is embedded.

Often a distinction is made between 'local' structures of discourse (such as relations among sentences, propositions, and turns) and 'global' structures, such as overall topics and the schematic organization of discourses and conversations. For instance, many types of discourse begin with some kind of global 'summary', in titles, headlines, leads, abstracts, and so on.

A problem for the discourse analyst is to decide when a particular feature is relevant to the specification required. A question many linguists ask is: "Are there general principles which will determine the relevance or nature of the specification?[17]"[citation needed]

Topics of interest

Topics of discourse analysis include:[18]

Prominent academics

Political discourse

See also: Public sphere and Social media use in politics

Political discourse is the text and talk of professional politicians or political institutions, such as presidents and prime ministers and other members of government, parliament or political parties, both at the local, national and international levels, includes both the speaker and the audience.[20]

Political discourse analysis is a field of discourse analysis which focuses on discourse in political forums (such as debates, speeches, and hearings) as the phenomenon of interest. Policy analysis requires discourse analysis to be effective from the post-positivist perspective.[21][22]

Political discourse is the formal exchange of reasoned views as to which of several alternative courses of action should be taken to solve a societal problem.[23][24]

Corporate discourse

Corporate discourse can be broadly defined as the language used by corporations. It encompasses a set of messages that a corporation sends out to the world (the general public, the customers and other corporations) and the messages it uses to communicate within its own structures (the employees and other stakeholders).[25]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Discourse Analysis—What Speakers Do in Conversation". Linguistic Society of America. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  2. ^ "Yatsko's Computational Linguistics Laboratory". yatsko.zohosites.com. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  3. ^ Elden, Stuart (2016-11-10). "When did Foucault translate Leo Spitzer?". Progressive Geographies.
  4. ^ Hardy, Donald E., -- (1991-04-01). "The foundations of linguistic theory: Selected writings of Roy Harris Ed. by Nigel Love (review)". Language. 67 (3). ISSN 1535-0665.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  5. ^ Hardy, Donald E., -- (1991-04-01). "The foundations of linguistic theory: Selected writings of Roy Harris Ed. by Nigel Love (review)". Language. 67 (3). ISSN 1535-0665.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ John Corcoran, then a colleague of Harris in Linguistics at University of Pennsylvania, summarized and critically examined the development of Harris’s thought on discourse through 1969 in lectures attended by Harris’ colleagues and students in Philadelphia and Cambridge.
    Corcoran, John (1972). Plötz, Senta (ed.). "Harris on the Structures of Language". Transformationelle Analyse. Frankfurt: Athenäum Verlag: 275–292.
  7. ^ "SIL International". SIL International. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  8. ^ "University of Pennsylvania |". www.upenn.edu. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  9. ^ Loriot, James; Hollenbach, Barbara (1970). "Shipibo Paragraph Structure". Foundations of Language. 6 (1): 43–66. ISSN 0015-900X. JSTOR 25000427.
  10. ^ "University of Michigan". umich.edu. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  11. ^ "Conversational Analysis | Encyclopedia.com". www.encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  12. ^ Lynch, Michael (2011-07-13). "Harold Garfinkel obituary". The Guardian. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  13. ^ Keller, Reiner (March 2011). "The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD)". Human Studies. 34 (1): 43–65. doi:10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z. ISSN 0163-8548. S2CID 143674874.
  14. ^ James, Carl (June 1993). "What is applied linguistics?". International Journal of Applied Linguistics. 3 (1): 17–32. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.1993.tb00041.x. ISSN 0802-6106.
  15. ^ Barbey, Aron K.; Colom, Roberto; Grafman, Jordan (January 2014). "Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension: a human lesion study". Brain. 137 (1): 277–287. doi:10.1093/brain/awt312. ISSN 1460-2156. PMC 3954106. PMID 24293267.
  16. ^ Yates, Diana. "Researchers map brain areas vital to understanding language". news.illinois.edu. University of Illinois. Retrieved 2019-11-25.
  17. ^ E Shaw, Sara; Bailey, Julia (October 2009). "Discourse analysis: what is it and why is it relevant to family practice?". Family Practice. 26 (5): 413–419. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmp038. ISSN 0263-2136. PMC 2743732. PMID 19556336.
  18. ^ Van Dijk, Teun (2005-01-01). "Critical discourse analysis". In Schiffrin, Deborah; Tannen, Deborah; Hamilton, Heidi E. (eds.). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Malden, Massachusetts, USA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. pp. 352–371. doi:10.1002/9780470753460. ISBN 978-0-470-75346-0.
  19. ^ Sutanto, Haryo; Purbaningrum, Dwi (2022-12-29). "Representation of Power and Ideology on Jokowi's Speech". WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi. 21 (2): 238–251. doi:10.32509/wacana.v21i2.2143. ISSN 2598-7402. S2CID 255654982.
  20. ^ Kitaeva, Elena; Ozerova, Olga (2019). Intertextuality in Political Discourse. Language, Power, and Ideology in Political Writing: Emerging Research and Opportunities. Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies. pp. 143–170. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-9444-4.ch007. ISBN 9781522594444. S2CID 197717211. Retrieved 2020-12-03.
  21. ^ Wortham, Stanton; Kim, Deoksoon; May, Stephen, eds. (2017). Discourse and Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02243-7. ISBN 978-3-319-02242-0.
  22. ^ Hult, F.M. (2015). "Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis". In Hult, F.M.; Johnson, D.C (eds.). Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning: A Practical Guide (First ed.). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley. pp. 217–31. ISBN 978-1-118-33984-8. OCLC 905699853..
  23. ^ Johnson, David W.; Johnson, Roger T. (2000). "Civil political discourse in a democracy: The contribution of psychology". Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology. 6 (4): 291–317. doi:10.1207/S15327949PAC0604_01. ISSN 1532-7949.
  24. ^ Sutanto, Haryo; Purbaningrum, Dwi (2022-12-29). "Representation of Power and Ideology on Jokowi's Speech". WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi. 21 (2): 238–251. doi:10.32509/wacana.v21i2.2143. ISSN 2598-7402. S2CID 255654982.
  25. ^ Breeze, Ruth (2013). Corporate Discourse. London: Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN 978-1-4411-7753-7. OCLC 852898361.

External links

  • DiscourseNet. International Association for Discourse Studies
  • The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program and Measures of the Referential Process.
  • Statement concerning James Loriot, p. 9
  • A discourse analysis related international conference You can find some information and events related to Metadiscourse Across Genres by visiting MAG 2017 website

May 04, 2023
discourse, analysis, discourse, studies, approach, analysis, written, vocal, sign, language, significant, semiotic, event, objects, discourse, analysis, discourse, writing, conversation, communicative, event, variously, defined, terms, coherent, sequences, sen. Discourse analysis DA or discourse studies is an approach to the analysis of written vocal or sign language use or any significant semiotic event The objects of discourse analysis discourse writing conversation communicative event are variously defined in terms of coherent sequences of sentences propositions speech or turns at talk Contrary to much of traditional linguistics discourse analysts not only study language use beyond the sentence boundary but also prefer to analyze naturally occurring language use not invented examples 1 Text linguistics is a closely related field The essential difference between discourse analysis and text linguistics is that discourse analysis aims at revealing socio psychological characteristics of a person persons rather than text structure 2 Discourse analysis has been taken up in a variety of disciplines in the humanities and social sciences including linguistics education sociology anthropology social work cognitive psychology social psychology area studies cultural studies international relations human geography environmental science communication studies biblical studies public relations argumentation studies and translation studies each of which is subject to its own assumptions dimensions of analysis and methodologies Contents 1 History 1 1 Early use of the term 1 2 In the humanities 1 3 Foucault 2 Perspectives 3 Topics of interest 4 Prominent academics 4 1 Political discourse 4 2 Corporate discourse 5 See also 6 References 7 External linksHistory EditThe examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject You may improve this article discuss the issue on the talk page or create a new article as appropriate December 2010 Learn how and when to remove this template message Early use of the term Edit The ancient Greeks among others had much to say on discourse however there is ongoing discussion about whether Austria born Leo Spitzer s Stilstudien Style Studies of 1928 is the earliest example of discourse analysis DA Michel Foucault translated it into French 3 However the term first came into general use following the publication of a series of papers by Zellig Harris from 1952 citation needed reporting on work from which he developed transformational grammar in the late 1930s Formal equivalence relations among the sentences of a coherent discourse are made explicit by using sentence transformations to put the text in a canonical form Words and sentences with equivalent information then appear in the same column of an array This work progressed over the next four decades see references into a science of sublanguage analysis Kittredge amp Lehrberger 1982 culminating in a demonstration of the informational structures in texts of a sublanguage of science that of Immunology Harris et al 1989 4 and a fully articulated theory of linguistic informational content Harris 1991 5 During this time however most linguists ignored such developments in favor of a succession of elaborate theories of sentence level syntax and semantics 6 In January 1953 a linguist working for the American Bible Society James A Lauriault Loriot needed to find answers to some fundamental errors in translating Quechua in the Cuzco area of Peru Following Harris s 1952 publications he worked over the meaning and placement of each word in a collection of Quechua legends with a native speaker of Quechua and was able to formulate discourse rules that transcended the simple sentence structure He then applied the process to Shipibo another language of Eastern Peru He taught the theory at the 7 Summer Institute of Linguistics in Norman Oklahoma in the summers of 1956 and 1957 and entered the 8 University of Pennsylvania to study with Harris in the interim year He tried to publish a paper 9 Shipibo Paragraph Structure but it was delayed until 1970 Loriot amp Hollenbach 1970 citation needed In the meantime Kenneth Lee Pike a professor at University of Michigan 10 Ann Arbor taught the theory and one of his students Robert E Longacre developed it in his writings Harris s methodology disclosing the correlation of form with meaning was developed into a system for the computer aided analysis of natural language by a team led by Naomi Sager at NYU which has been applied to a number of sublanguage domains most notably to medical informatics The software for the Medical Language Processor is publicly available on SourceForge In the humanities Edit In the late 1960s and 1970s and without reference to this prior work a variety of other approaches to a new cross discipline of DA began to develop in most of the humanities and social sciences concurrently with and related to other disciplines These include semiotics psycholinguistics sociolinguistics and pragmatics Many of these approaches especially those influenced by the social sciences favor a more dynamic study of oral talk in interaction An example is 11 conversational analysis which was influenced by the Sociologist Harold Garfinkel 12 the founder of Ethnomethodology Foucault Edit In Europe Michel Foucault became one of the key theorists of the subject especially of discourse and wrote The Archaeology of Knowledge In this context the term discourse no longer refers to formal linguistic aspects but to institutionalized patterns of knowledge that become manifest in disciplinary structures and operate by the connection of knowledge and power Since the 1970s Foucault s works have had an increasing impact especially on discourse analysis in the field of social sciences Thus in modern European social sciences one can find a wide range of different approaches working with Foucault s definition of discourse and his theoretical concepts Apart from the original context in France there is since 2005 a broad discussion on socio scientific discourse analysis in Germany Here for example the sociologist Reiner Keller developed his widely recognized Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse SKAD 13 Following the sociology of knowledge by Peter L Berger and Thomas Luckmann Keller argues that our sense of reality in everyday life and thus the meaning of every object action and event is the product of a permanent routinized interaction In this context SKAD has been developed as a scientific perspective that is able to understand the processes of The Social Construction of Reality on all levels of social life by combining the prementioned Michel Foucault s theories of discourse and power while also introducing the theory of knowledge by Berger Luckmann Whereas the latter primarily focus on the constitution and stabilization of knowledge on the level of interaction Foucault s perspective concentrates on institutional contexts of the production and integration of knowledge where the subject mainly appears to be determined by knowledge and power Therefore the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse can also be seen as an approach to deal with the vividly discussed micro macro problem in sociology citation needed Perspectives EditThe following are some of the specific theoretical perspectives and analytical approaches used in linguistic discourse analysis Applied linguistics an interdisciplinary perspective on linguistic analysis 14 Cognitive neuroscience of discourse comprehension 15 16 Cognitive psychology studying the production and comprehension of discourse Conversation analysis Critical discourse analysis Discursive psychology Emergent grammar Ethnography of communication Functional grammar Interactional sociolinguistics Mediated Stylistics Pragmatics Response based therapy counselling Rhetoric Stylistics linguistics Sublanguage analysis Tagmemics Text linguistics Variation analysisAlthough these approaches emphasize different aspects of language use they all view language as social interaction and are concerned with the social contexts in which discourse is embedded Often a distinction is made between local structures of discourse such as relations among sentences propositions and turns and global structures such as overall topics and the schematic organization of discourses and conversations For instance many types of discourse begin with some kind of global summary in titles headlines leads abstracts and so on A problem for the discourse analyst is to decide when a particular feature is relevant to the specification required A question many linguists ask is Are there general principles which will determine the relevance or nature of the specification 17 citation needed Topics of interest EditTopics of discourse analysis include 18 The various levels or dimensions of discourse such as sounds intonation etc gestures syntax the lexicon style rhetoric meanings speech acts moves strategies turns and other aspects of interaction Genres of discourse various types of discourse in politics the media education science business etc The relations between discourse and the emergence of syntactic structure The relations between text discourse and context The relations between discourse and power 19 The relations between discourse and interaction The relations between discourse and cognition and memory Lexical densityProminent academics EditMarc Angenot Johannes Angermuller Mikhail Bakhtin Roland Barthes Emile Benveniste Jean Paul Benzecri Jan Blommaert Georges Canguilhem Teun van DijkOswald Ducrot Norman Fairclough Michel Foucault Heidi E Hamilton Roman Jakobson Barbara Johnstone Dominique Maingueneau Sinfree Makoni Damon MayaffreMichel Pecheux Jonathan Potter Paul Ricœur Georges Elia Sarfati Ferdinand de Saussure Deborah Schiffrin Deborah Tannen Margaret Wetherell Ruth Wodak Political discourse Edit See also Public sphere and Social media use in politics Political discourse is the text and talk of professional politicians or political institutions such as presidents and prime ministers and other members of government parliament or political parties both at the local national and international levels includes both the speaker and the audience 20 Political discourse analysis is a field of discourse analysis which focuses on discourse in political forums such as debates speeches and hearings as the phenomenon of interest Policy analysis requires discourse analysis to be effective from the post positivist perspective 21 22 Political discourse is the formal exchange of reasoned views as to which of several alternative courses of action should be taken to solve a societal problem 23 24 Corporate discourse Edit Corporate discourse can be broadly defined as the language used by corporations It encompasses a set of messages that a corporation sends out to the world the general public the customers and other corporations and the messages it uses to communicate within its own structures the employees and other stakeholders 25 See also EditActor policy debate Critical discourse analysis Dialogical analysis Discourse representation theory Frame analysis Communicative action Essex School of discourse analysis Ethnolinguistics Foucauldian discourse analysis Interpersonal communication Linguistic anthropology Narrative analysis Pragmatics Rhetoric Sociolinguistics Statement analysis Stylistics linguistics WorldviewReferences Edit Discourse Analysis What Speakers Do in Conversation Linguistic Society of America Retrieved 2019 11 25 Yatsko s Computational Linguistics Laboratory yatsko zohosites com Retrieved 2019 11 25 Elden Stuart 2016 11 10 When did Foucault translate Leo Spitzer Progressive Geographies Hardy Donald E 1991 04 01 The foundations of linguistic theory Selected writings of Roy Harris Ed by Nigel Love review Language 67 3 ISSN 1535 0665 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Hardy Donald E 1991 04 01 The foundations of linguistic theory Selected writings of Roy Harris Ed by Nigel Love review Language 67 3 ISSN 1535 0665 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link John Corcoran then a colleague of Harris in Linguistics at University of Pennsylvania summarized and critically examined the development of Harris s thought on discourse through 1969 in lectures attended by Harris colleagues and students in Philadelphia and Cambridge Corcoran John 1972 Plotz Senta ed Harris on the Structures of Language Transformationelle Analyse Frankfurt Athenaum Verlag 275 292 SIL International SIL International Retrieved 2020 12 03 University of Pennsylvania www upenn edu Retrieved 2020 12 03 Loriot James Hollenbach Barbara 1970 Shipibo Paragraph Structure Foundations of Language 6 1 43 66 ISSN 0015 900X JSTOR 25000427 University of Michigan umich edu Retrieved 2020 12 03 Conversational Analysis Encyclopedia com www encyclopedia com Retrieved 2020 12 03 Lynch Michael 2011 07 13 Harold Garfinkel obituary The Guardian Retrieved 2020 12 03 Keller Reiner March 2011 The Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse SKAD Human Studies 34 1 43 65 doi 10 1007 s10746 011 9175 z ISSN 0163 8548 S2CID 143674874 James Carl June 1993 What is applied linguistics International Journal of Applied Linguistics 3 1 17 32 doi 10 1111 j 1473 4192 1993 tb00041 x ISSN 0802 6106 Barbey Aron K Colom Roberto Grafman Jordan January 2014 Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension a human lesion study Brain 137 1 277 287 doi 10 1093 brain awt312 ISSN 1460 2156 PMC 3954106 PMID 24293267 Yates Diana Researchers map brain areas vital to understanding language news illinois edu University of Illinois Retrieved 2019 11 25 E Shaw Sara Bailey Julia October 2009 Discourse analysis what is it and why is it relevant to family practice Family Practice 26 5 413 419 doi 10 1093 fampra cmp038 ISSN 0263 2136 PMC 2743732 PMID 19556336 Van Dijk Teun 2005 01 01 Critical discourse analysis In Schiffrin Deborah Tannen Deborah Hamilton Heidi E eds The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Malden Massachusetts USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd pp 352 371 doi 10 1002 9780470753460 ISBN 978 0 470 75346 0 Sutanto Haryo Purbaningrum Dwi 2022 12 29 Representation of Power and Ideology on Jokowi s Speech WACANA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi 21 2 238 251 doi 10 32509 wacana v21i2 2143 ISSN 2598 7402 S2CID 255654982 Kitaeva Elena Ozerova Olga 2019 Intertextuality in Political Discourse Language Power and Ideology in Political Writing Emerging Research and Opportunities Advances in Linguistics and Communication Studies pp 143 170 doi 10 4018 978 1 5225 9444 4 ch007 ISBN 9781522594444 S2CID 197717211 Retrieved 2020 12 03 Wortham Stanton Kim Deoksoon May Stephen eds 2017 Discourse and Education Cham Springer International Publishing doi 10 1007 978 3 319 02243 7 ISBN 978 3 319 02242 0 Hult F M 2015 Making policy connections across scales using nexus analysis In Hult F M Johnson D C eds Research Methods in Language Policy and Planning A Practical Guide First ed Chichester West Sussex Wiley pp 217 31 ISBN 978 1 118 33984 8 OCLC 905699853 Johnson David W Johnson Roger T 2000 Civil political discourse in a democracy The contribution of psychology Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology 6 4 291 317 doi 10 1207 S15327949PAC0604 01 ISSN 1532 7949 Sutanto Haryo Purbaningrum Dwi 2022 12 29 Representation of Power and Ideology on Jokowi s Speech WACANA Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi 21 2 238 251 doi 10 32509 wacana v21i2 2143 ISSN 2598 7402 S2CID 255654982 Breeze Ruth 2013 Corporate Discourse London Bloomsbury Academic ISBN 978 1 4411 7753 7 OCLC 852898361 External links EditDiscourseNet International Association for Discourse Studies The Discourse Attributes Analysis Program and Measures of the Referential Process Linguistic Society of America Discourse Analysis by Deborah Tannen Discourse Analysis by Z Harris Daniel L Everett Documenting Languages The View from the Brazilian Amazon Statement concerning James Loriot p 9 A discourse analysis related international conference You can find some information and events related to Metadiscourse Across Genres by visiting MAG 2017 website Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Discourse analysis amp oldid 1146369658, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.