Blood–brain barrier

The blood–brain barrier (BBB) is a highly selective semipermeable border of endothelial cells that regulates the transfer of solutes and chemicals between the circulatory system and the central nervous system, thus protecting the brain from harmful or unwanted substances in the blood.^[1] The blood–brain barrier is formed by endothelial cells of the capillary wall, astrocyte end-feet ensheathing the capillary, and pericytes embedded in the capillary basement membrane.^[2] This system allows the passage of some small molecules by passive diffusion, as well as the selective and active transport of various nutrients, ions, organic anions, and macromolecules such as glucose and amino acids that are crucial to neural function.^[3]

Blood–brain barrier
Solute permeability at the BBB vs. choroid plexus
Details
System	Neuroimmune system
Identifiers
Acronym(s)	BBB
MeSH	D001812
Anatomical terminology [edit on Wikidata]

The blood–brain barrier restricts the passage of pathogens, the diffusion of solutes in the blood, and large or hydrophilic molecules into the cerebrospinal fluid, while allowing the diffusion of hydrophobic molecules (O₂, CO₂, hormones) and small non-polar molecules.^[4][5] Cells of the barrier actively transport metabolic products such as glucose across the barrier using specific transport proteins.^[6] The barrier also restricts the passage of peripheral immune factors, like signaling molecules, antibodies, and immune cells, into the CNS, thus insulating the brain from damage due to peripheral immune events.^[7]

Specialized brain structures participating in sensory and secretory integration within brain neural circuits—the circumventricular organs and choroid plexus—have in contrast highly permeable capillaries.^[8]

Structure

 

Part of a network of capillaries supplying brain cells

 

The astrocytes type 1 surrounding capillaries in the brain

 

Sketch showing constitution of blood vessels inside the brain

The BBB results from the selectivity of the tight junctions between the endothelial cells of brain capillaries, restricting the passage of solutes.^[1] At the interface between blood and the brain, endothelial cells are adjoined continuously by these tight junctions, which are composed of smaller subunits of transmembrane proteins, such as occludin, claudins (such as Claudin-5), junctional adhesion molecule (such as JAM-A).^[6] Each of these tight junction proteins is stabilized to the endothelial cell membrane by another protein complex that includes scaffolding proteins such as tight junction protein 1 (ZO1) and associated proteins.^[6]

The BBB is composed of endothelial cells restricting passage of substances from the blood more selectively than endothelial cells of capillaries elsewhere in the body.^[9] Astrocyte cell projections called astrocytic feet (also known as "glia limitans") surround the endothelial cells of the BBB, providing biochemical support to those cells.^[10] The BBB is distinct from the quite similar blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, which is a function of the choroidal cells of the choroid plexus, and from the blood-retinal barrier, which can be considered a part of the whole realm of such barriers.^[11]

Not all vessels in the human brain exhibit BBB properties. Some examples of this include the circumventricular organs, the roof of the third and fourth ventricles, capillaries in the pineal gland on the roof of the diencephalon and the pineal gland. The pineal gland secretes the hormone melatonin "directly into the systemic circulation",^[12] thus melatonin is not affected by the blood–brain barrier.^[13]

Development

The BBB appears to be functional by the time of birth. P-glycoprotein, a transporter, exists already in the embryonal endothelium.^[14]

Measurement of brain uptake of various blood-borne solutes showed that newborn endothelial cells were functionally similar to those in adults,^[15] indicating that a selective BBB is operative at birth.

In mice, Claudin-5 loss during development is lethal and results in size-selective loosening of the BBB.^[16]

Function

See also: Neuroimmune system

The blood–brain barrier acts effectively to protect brain tissue from circulating pathogens and other potentially toxic substances.^[17] Accordingly, blood-borne infections of the brain are rare.^[1] Infections of the brain that do occur are often difficult to treat. Antibodies are too large to cross the blood–brain barrier, and only certain antibiotics are able to pass.^[18] In some cases, a drug has to be administered directly into the cerebrospinal fluid where it can enter the brain by crossing the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier.^[19][20]

Circumventricular organs

Main article: Circumventricular organs

Circumventricular organs (CVOs) are individual structures located adjacent to the fourth ventricle or third ventricle in the brain, and are characterized by dense capillary beds with permeable endothelial cells unlike those of the blood–brain barrier.^[21][22] Included among CVOs having highly permeable capillaries are the area postrema, subfornical organ, vascular organ of the lamina terminalis, median eminence, pineal gland, and three lobes of the pituitary gland.^[21][23]

Permeable capillaries of the sensory CVOs (area postrema, subfornical organ, vascular organ of the lamina terminalis) enable rapid detection of circulating signals in systemic blood, while those of the secretory CVOs (median eminence, pineal gland, pituitary lobes) facilitate transport of brain-derived signals into the circulating blood.^[21][22] Consequently, the CVO permeable capillaries are the point of bidirectional blood–brain communication for neuroendocrine function.^[21][23][24]

Specialized permeable zones

The border zones between brain tissue "behind" the blood–brain barrier and zones "open" to blood signals in certain CVOs contain specialized hybrid capillaries that are leakier than typical brain capillaries, but not as permeable as CVO capillaries. Such zones exist at the border of the area postrema—nucleus tractus solitarii (NTS),^[25] and median eminence—hypothalamic arcuate nucleus.^[24][26] These zones appear to function as rapid transit regions for brain structures involved in diverse neural circuits—like the NTS and arcuate nucleus—to receive blood signals which are then transmitted into neural output.^[24][25] The permeable capillary zone shared between the median eminence and hypothalamic arcuate nucleus is augmented by wide pericapillary spaces, facilitating bidirectional flow of solutes between the two structures, and indicating that the median eminence is not only a secretory organ, but may also be a sensory organ.^[24][26]

Therapeutic research

As a drug target

The blood–brain barrier is formed by the brain capillary endothelium and excludes from the brain 100% of large-molecule neurotherapeutics and more than 98% of all small-molecule drugs.^[1] Overcoming the difficulty of delivering therapeutic agents to specific regions of the brain presents a major challenge to treatment of most brain disorders.^[27][28] In its neuroprotective role, the blood–brain barrier functions to hinder the delivery of many potentially important diagnostic and therapeutic agents to the brain. Therapeutic molecules and antibodies that might otherwise be effective in diagnosis and therapy do not cross the BBB in adequate amounts to be clinically effective.^[27] The BBB represents an obstacle to some drugs reaching the brain, thus to overcome this barrier some peptides able to naturally cross the BBB have been widely investigated as a drug delivery system.^[29]

Mechanisms for drug targeting in the brain involve going either "through" or "behind" the BBB. Modalities for drug delivery to the brain in unit doses through the BBB entail its disruption by osmotic means, or biochemically by the use of vasoactive substances, such as bradykinin,^[30] or even by localized exposure to high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).^[31]

Other methods used to get through the BBB may entail the use of endogenous transport systems, including carrier-mediated transporters, such as glucose and amino acid carriers, receptor-mediated transcytosis for insulin or transferrin, and the blocking of active efflux transporters such as p-glycoprotein.^[27] Some studies have shown that vectors targeting BBB transporters, such as the transferrin receptor, have been found to remain entrapped in brain endothelial cells of capillaries, instead of being ferried across the BBB into the targeted area.^[27][32]

Nanoparticles

Main article: Nanoparticles for drug delivery to the brain

Nanotechnology is under preliminary research for its potential to facilitate the transfer of drugs across the BBB.^[27][33][34] Capillary endothelial cells and associated pericytes may be abnormal in tumors and the blood–brain barrier may not always be intact in brain tumors.^[34] Other factors, such as astrocytes, may contribute to the resistance of brain tumors to therapy using nanoparticles.^[35] Fat soluble molecules less than 400 daltons in mass can freely diffuse past the BBB through lipid mediated passive diffusion.^[36]

Damage in injury and disease

The blood–brain barrier may become damaged in select neurological diseases, as indicated by neuroimaging studies of Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, epilepsy, ischemic stroke,^{[17][37][38][39]} and brain trauma,^[27] and in systemic diseases, such as liver failure.^[1] Effects such as impaired glucose transport and endothelial degeneration may lead to metabolic dysfunction within the brain, and an increased permeability of the BBB to proinflammatory factors, potentially allowing antibiotics and phagocytes to move across the BBB.^[1][27]

Prediction

There have been many attempts to correlate the experimental blood–brain barrier permeability with physicochemical properties. In 1988, the first QSAR study of brain–blood distribution conducted reported the in vivo values in rats for a large number of H2 receptor histamine agonists.^[40]

The first papers modelling blood-brain barrier permeability identified three properties, i.e., molecular volume, lipophilicity, and hydrogen bonding potential, as contributing to solute transport through the blood-brain barrier.^[41] A 2022 dataset selected different classification models^[42] based on molecular fingerprints,^[43] MACCS166 keys^[44] and molecular descriptors.^[45]

History

A 1898 study observed that low-concentration "bile salts" failed to affect behavior when injected into the blood of animals. Thus, in theory, the salts failed to enter the brain.^[46]

Two years later, Max Lewandowsky may have been the first to coin the term "blood–brain barrier" in 1900, referring to the hypothesized semipermeable membrane.^[47] There is some debate over the creation of the term blood–brain barrier as it is often attributed to Lewandowsky, but it does not appear in his papers. The creator of the term may have been Lina Stern.^[48] Stern was a Russian scientist who published her work in Russian and French. Due to the language barrier between her publications and English-speaking scientists, this could have made her work a lesser-known origin of the term.

All the while, bacteriologist Paul Ehrlich was studying staining, a procedure that is used in many microscopy studies to make fine biological structures visible using chemical dyes.^[49] As Ehrlich injected some of these dyes (notably the aniline dyes that were then widely used), the dye stained all of the organs of some kinds of animals except for their brains.^[49] At that time, Ehrlich attributed this lack of staining to the brain simply not picking up as much of the dye.^[47]

However, in a later experiment in 1913, Edwin Goldmann (one of Ehrlich's students) injected the dye directly into the cerebrospinal fluid of animal brains. He found then the brains did become dyed, but the rest of the body did not, demonstrating the existence of a compartmentalization between the two. At that time, it was thought that the blood vessels themselves were responsible for the barrier, since no obvious membrane could be found.

See also

• blood–ocular barrier – Physical barrier between the local blood vessels and most parts of the eye itself
• blood–retinal barrier – Part of the blood–ocular barrier that prevents certain substances from entering the retina
• blood–saliva barrier – Semipermeable biological barrier
• blood–spinal cord barrier – Semipermeable anatomical interface
• blood–testis barrier – Physical barrier between the blood vessels and the seminiferous tubules of animal testes

References

1. Daneman R, Prat A (January 2015). "The blood-brain barrier". Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 7 (1): a020412. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a020412. PMC 4292164. PMID 25561720.
2. Ballabh P, Braun A, Nedergaard M (June 2004). "The blood-brain barrier: an overview: structure, regulation, and clinical implications". Neurobiology of Disease. 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2003.12.016. PMID 15207256. S2CID 2202060.
3. Gupta S, Dhanda S, Sandhir R (2019). "Anatomy and physiology of blood-brain barrier". In Gao H, Gao X (eds.). Brain Targeted Drug Delivery System. Academic Press. pp. 7–31. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814001-7.00002-0. ISBN 978-0-12-814001-7. S2CID 91847478. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
4. Obermeier B, Daneman R, Ransohoff RM (December 2013). "Development, maintenance and disruption of the blood-brain barrier". Nature Medicine. 19 (12): 1584–96. doi:10.1038/nm.3407. PMC 4080800. PMID 24309662.
5. Kadry H, Noorani B, Cucullo L (November 2020). "A blood-brain barrier overview on structure, function, impairment, and biomarkers of integrity". Fluids Barriers CNS. 17 (1): 69. doi:10.1186/s12987-020-00230-3. PMC 7672931. PMID 33208141.
6. Stamatovic SM, Keep RF, Andjelkovic AV (September 2008). "Brain endothelial cell-cell junctions: how to "open" the blood brain barrier". Current Neuropharmacology. 6 (3): 179–92. doi:10.2174/157015908785777210. PMC 2687937. PMID 19506719.
7. Muldoon LL, Alvarez JI, Begley DJ, Boado RJ, Del Zoppo GJ, Doolittle ND, et al. (January 2013). "Immunologic privilege in the central nervous system and the blood-brain barrier". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 33 (1): 13–21. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2012.153. PMC 3597357. PMID 23072749.
8. Kaur C, Ling EA (September 2017). "The circumventricular organs". Histology and Histopathology. 32 (9): 879–892. doi:10.14670/HH-11-881. PMID 28177105.
9. van Leeuwen LM, Evans RJ, Jim KK, Verboom T, Fang X, Bojarczuk A, et al. (February 2018). "A transgenic zebrafish model for the in vivo study of the blood and choroid plexus brain barriers using claudin 5". Biology Open. 7 (2): bio030494. doi:10.1242/bio.030494. PMC 5861362. PMID 29437557.
10. Abbott NJ, Rönnbäck L, Hansson E (January 2006). "Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier". Nature Reviews. Neuroscience. 7 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1038/nrn1824. PMID 16371949. S2CID 205500476.
11. Hamilton RD, Foss AJ, Leach L (December 2007). "Establishment of a human in vitro model of the outer blood-retinal barrier". Journal of Anatomy. 211 (6): 707–16. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00812.x. PMC 2375847. PMID 17922819. 
12. Pritchard TC, Alloway KD (1999). Medical Neuroscience (1st ed.). Fence Creek Publishing. pp. 76–77. ISBN 978-1-889325-29-3. OCLC 41086829.
13. Gilgun-Sherki Y, Melamed E, Offen D (June 2001). "Oxidative stress induced-neurodegenerative diseases: the need for antioxidants that penetrate the blood brain barrier". Neuropharmacology. 40 (8): 959–75. doi:10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00019-3. PMID 11406187. S2CID 15395925.
14. Tsai CE, Daood MJ, Lane RH, Hansen TW, Gruetzmacher EM, Watchko JF (January 2002). "P-glycoprotein expression in mouse brain increases with maturation". Biology of the Neonate. 81 (1): 58–64. doi:10.1159/000047185. PMID 11803178. S2CID 46815691.
15. Braun LD, Cornford EM, Oldendorf WH (January 1980). "Newborn rabbit blood-brain barrier is selectively permeable and differs substantially from the adult". Journal of Neurochemistry. 34 (1): 147–52. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1980.tb04633.x. PMID 7452231. S2CID 21944159.
16. Nitta T, Hata M, Gotoh S, Seo Y, Sasaki H, Hashimoto N, et al. (May 2003). "Size-selective loosening of the blood-brain barrier in claudin-5-deficient mice". The Journal of Cell Biology. 161 (3): 653–60. doi:10.1083/jcb.200302070. PMC 2172943. PMID 12743111.
17. Abdullahi W, Tripathi D, Ronaldson PT (September 2018). "Blood-brain barrier dysfunction in ischemic stroke: targeting tight junctions and transporters for vascular protection". American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 315 (3): C343–C356. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00095.2018. PMC 6171039. PMID 29949404.
18. Raza MW, Shad A, Pedler SJ, Karamat KA (March 2005). "Penetration and activity of antibiotics in brain abscess". Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan. 15 (3): 165–167. PMID 15808097.
19. Pardridge WM (January 2011). "Drug transport in brain via the cerebrospinal fluid". Fluids and Barriers of the CNS. 8 (1): 7. doi:10.1186/2045-8118-8-7. PMC 3042981. PMID 21349155.
20. Chen Y, Imai H, Ito A, Saito N (2013). "Novel modified method for injection into the cerebrospinal fluid via the cerebellomedullary cistern in mice". Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis. 73 (2): 304–311. doi:10.55782/ane-2013-1938. PMID 23823990.
21. Gross PM, Weindl A (December 1987). "Peering through the windows of the brain". Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 7 (6): 663–72. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.1987.120. PMID 2891718.
22. Gross PM (1992). "Chapter 31: Circumventricular organ capillaries". Circumventricular Organs and Brain Fluid Environment - Molecular and Functional Aspects. Progress in Brain Research. Vol. 91. pp. 219–33. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)62338-9. ISBN 9780444814197. PMID 1410407.
23. Miyata S (2015). "New aspects in fenestrated capillary and tissue dynamics in the sensory circumventricular organs of adult brains". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 9: 390. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00390. PMC 4621430. PMID 26578857.
24. Rodríguez EM, Blázquez JL, Guerra M (April 2010). "The design of barriers in the hypothalamus allows the median eminence and the arcuate nucleus to enjoy private milieus: the former opens to the portal blood and the latter to the cerebrospinal fluid". Peptides. 31 (4): 757–76. doi:10.1016/j.peptides.2010.01.003. PMID 20093161. S2CID 44760261.
25. Gross PM, Wall KM, Pang JJ, Shaver SW, Wainman DS (December 1990). "Microvascular specializations promoting rapid interstitial solute dispersion in nucleus tractus solitarius". The American Journal of Physiology. 259 (6 Pt 2): R1131-8. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1990.259.6.R1131. PMID 2260724.
26. Shaver SW, Pang JJ, Wainman DS, Wall KM, Gross PM (March 1992). "Morphology and function of capillary networks in subregions of the rat tuber cinereum". Cell and Tissue Research. 267 (3): 437–48. doi:10.1007/BF00319366. PMID 1571958. S2CID 27789146.
27. Sweeney MD, Sagare AP, Zlokovic BV (March 2018). "Blood-brain barrier breakdown in Alzheimer disease and other neurodegenerative disorders". Nature Reviews. Neurology. 14 (3): 133–150. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.188. PMC 5829048. PMID 29377008.
28. Harilal S, Jose J, Parambi DG, Kumar R, Unnikrishnan MK, Uddin MS, et al. (July 2020). "Revisiting the blood-brain barrier: A hard nut to crack in the transportation of drug molecules". Brain Research Bulletin. 160: 121–140. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2020.03.018. PMID 32315731. S2CID 215807970.
29. de Oliveira EC, da Costa KS, Taube PS, Lima AH, Junior CS (2022-03-25). "Biological Membrane-Penetrating Peptides: Computational Prediction and Applications". Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 12: 838259. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2022.838259. PMC 8992797. PMID 35402305.
30. Marcos-Contreras OA, Martinez de Lizarrondo S, Bardou I, Orset C, Pruvost M, Anfray A, et al. (November 2016). "Hyperfibrinolysis increases blood-brain barrier permeability by a plasmin- and bradykinin-dependent mechanism". Blood. 128 (20): 2423–2434. doi:10.1182/blood-2016-03-705384. PMID 27531677.
31. McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K (May 2008). "Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index". Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. 34 (5): 834–40. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.10.016. PMC 2442477. PMID 18207311.
32. Wiley DT, Webster P, Gale A, Davis ME (May 2013). "Transcytosis and brain uptake of transferrin-containing nanoparticles by tuning avidity to transferrin receptor". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 110 (21): 8662–7. Bibcode:2013PNAS..110.8662W. doi:10.1073/pnas.1307152110. PMC 3666717. PMID 23650374.
33. Krol S, Macrez R, Docagne F, Defer G, Laurent S, Rahman M, et al. (March 2013). "Therapeutic benefits from nanoparticles: the potential significance of nanoscience in diseases with compromise to the blood brain barrier". Chemical Reviews. 113 (3): 1877–903. doi:10.1021/cr200472g. PMID 23157552.
34. Silva GA (December 2008). "Nanotechnology approaches to crossing the blood-brain barrier and drug delivery to the CNS". BMC Neuroscience. 9 (Suppl 3): S4. doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-S3-S4. PMC 2604882. PMID 19091001.
35. Hashizume H, Baluk P, Morikawa S, McLean JW, Thurston G, Roberge S, et al. (April 2000). "Openings between defective endothelial cells explain tumor vessel leakiness". The American Journal of Pathology. 156 (4): 1363–80. doi:10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65006-7. PMC 1876882. PMID 10751361.
36. Souza RM, da Silva IC, Delgado AB, da Silva PH, Costa VR (2018). "Focused ultrasound and Alzheimer's disease A systematic review". Dementia & Neuropsychologia. 12 (4): 353–359. doi:10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-040003. PMC 6289486. PMID 30546844.
37. Turner RJ, Sharp FR (2016-03-04). "Implications of MMP9 for Blood Brain Barrier Disruption and Hemorrhagic Transformation Following Ischemic Stroke". Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 10: 56. doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00056. PMC 4777722. PMID 26973468.
38. Mracsko E, Veltkamp R (2014-11-20). "Neuroinflammation after intracerebral hemorrhage". Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 8: 388. doi:10.3389/fncel.2014.00388. PMC 4238323. PMID 25477782.
39. Alluri H, Wiggins-Dohlvik K, Davis ML, Huang JH, Tharakan B (October 2015). "Blood-brain barrier dysfunction following traumatic brain injury". Metabolic Brain Disease. 30 (5): 1093–1104. doi:10.1007/s11011-015-9651-7. PMID 25624154. S2CID 17688028.
40. Young RC, Mitchell RC, Brown TH, et al. (March 1988). "Development of a new physicochemical model for brain penetration and its application to the design of centrally acting H2 receptor histamine antagonists". Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 31 (3): 656–671. doi:10.1021/jm00398a028. eISSN 1520-4804. ISSN 0022-2623. PMID 2894467.
41. Zhang L, Zhu H, Oprea TI, Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (14 June 2008). "QSAR Modeling of the Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability for Diverse Organic Compounds". Pharmaceutical Research. 25 (8): 1902–1914. doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9609-0. eISSN 1573-904X. ISSN 0724-8741. PMID 18553217. S2CID 22184045.
42. Mauri A, Bertola M (2022). "Alvascience: A New Software Suite for the QSAR Workflow Applied to the Blood–Brain Barrier Permeability". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 23 (12882): 12882. doi:10.3390/ijms232112882. PMC 9655980. PMID 36361669.
43. Rogers D, Hahn M (2010-05-24). "Extended-Connectivity Fingerprints". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 50 (5): 742–754. doi:10.1021/ci100050t. ISSN 1549-9596. PMID 20426451.
44. Durant JL, Leland BA, Henry DR, Nourse JG (2002-11-01). "Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery". Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 42 (6): 1273–1280. doi:10.1021/ci010132r. ISSN 0095-2338. PMID 12444722.
45. Todeschini R, Consonni V (2009-07-15). Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry (1 ed.). Wiley. doi:10.1002/9783527628766. ISBN 978-3-527-31852-0.
46. Biedl A, Kraus R (1898). "Über eine bisher unbekannte toxische Wirkung der Gallensäuren auf das Zentralnervensystem" [A previously unknown toxic effect of bile acids on the central nervous system]. Zentralblatt Inn Med. 19: 1185–1200. Google Scholar: 4353654721035571173
47. "History of Blood-Brain Barrier". Davis Lab. The University of Arizona. Retrieved 2023-11-02.
48. Saunders NR, Dreifuss JJ, Dziegielewska KM, Johansson PA, Habgood MD, Møllgård K, Bauer HC (2014). "The rights and wrongs of blood-brain barrier permeability studies: a walk through 100 years of history". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 8: 404. doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00404. ISSN 1662-453X. PMC 4267212. PMID 25565938.
49. Saunders NR, Dziegielewska KM, Møllgård K, Habgood MD (2015). "Markers for blood-brain barrier integrity: how appropriate is Evans blue in the twenty-first century and what are the alternatives?". Frontiers in Neuroscience. 9: 385. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00385. PMC 4624851. PMID 26578854.