fbpx
Wikipedia

Battle of Franklin

The Battle of Franklin was fought on November 30, 1864, in Franklin, Tennessee, as part of the Franklin–Nashville Campaign of the American Civil War. It was one of the worst disasters of the war for the Confederate States Army. Confederate Lieutenant General (LTG) John Bell Hood's Army of Tennessee conducted numerous frontal assaults against fortified positions occupied by the Union forces under Major General (MGEN) John Schofield and was unable to prevent Schofield from executing a planned, orderly withdrawal to Nashville.

Battle of Franklin
Part of the American Civil War

Battle of Franklin, by Kurz and Allison (1891)
DateNovember 30, 1864 (1864-11-30)
Location35°55′03″N 86°52′24″W / 35.9174°N 86.8733°W / 35.9174; -86.8733
Result

Inconclusive

  • Union army continues retreat to Nashville
  • Confederate General claims victory
Belligerents
 United States (Union)  Confederate States
Commanders and leaders
John Schofield
David S. Stanley
John Bell Hood
Units involved
Army of the Ohio Army of Tennessee
Strength
27,000[1] 27,000-31,000[1]
Casualties and losses
2,326 (total: 189 killed, 1,033 wounded, 1,104 missing/captured)[1]

The Confederate assault of six infantry divisions containing eighteen brigades with 100 regiments numbering almost 20,000 men, sometimes called the "Pickett's Charge of the West", resulted in devastating losses to the men and the leadership of the Army of Tennessee—fourteen Confederate generals (six killed, seven wounded, and one captured) and 55 regimental commanders were casualties. After its defeat against MGEN George H. Thomas in the subsequent Battle of Nashville, the Army of Tennessee retreated with barely half the men with which it had begun the short offensive, and was effectively destroyed as a fighting force for the remainder of the war.

The 1864 Battle of Franklin was the second military action in the vicinity; a battle in 1863 was a minor action associated with a reconnaissance in force by Confederate cavalry leader MGEN Earl Van Dorn on April 10.

Background edit

Military situation edit

 
Kentucky-Northern Tennessee, 1864
 
Southern Tennessee-Alabama, 1864
 
Map of the Franklin–Nashville Campaign
  Confederate
  Union

Following his defeat in the Atlanta Campaign, Hood had hoped to lure MGEN William T. Sherman into battle by disrupting his railroad supply line from Chattanooga to Atlanta. After a brief period in which he pursued Hood, Sherman decided instead to cut his main army off from these lines and "live off the land" in his famed March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah. By doing so, he would avoid having to defend hundreds of miles of supply lines against constant raids, through which he predicted he would lose "a thousand men monthly and gain no result" against Hood's army.[4]

Sherman's march left the aggressive Hood unoccupied, and his Army of Tennessee had several options in attacking Sherman or falling upon his rear lines. The task of defending Tennessee and the rearguard against Hood fell to MGEN George H. Thomas, commander of the Army of the Cumberland. The principal forces available in Middle Tennessee were IV Corps of the Army of the Cumberland, commanded by MGEN David S. Stanley, and XXIII Corps of the Army of the Ohio, commanded by MGEN John Schofield, with a total strength of about 30,000. Another 30,000 troops under Thomas's command were in or moving toward Nashville.[5]

Rather than trying to chase Sherman in Georgia, Hood decided that he would attempt a major offensive northward, even though his invading force of 39,000 would be outnumbered by the 60,000 Union troops in Tennessee. He would move north into Tennessee and try to defeat portions of Thomas's army in detail before they could concentrate, seize the important manufacturing and supply center of Nashville, and continue north into Kentucky, possibly as far as the Ohio River.[6]

Hood even expected to pick up 20,000 recruits from Tennessee and Kentucky in his path of victory and then join up with Robert E. Lee's army in Virginia, a plan that historian James M. McPherson describes as "scripted in never-never land."[7][8] Hood had recovered from but was affected by a couple of serious physical battle wounds to a leg and arm, which caused him pain and limited his mobility. Hood spent the first three weeks of November quietly supplying the Army of Tennessee in northern Alabama in preparation for his offensive.[9]

Road to Franklin, November 21–29 edit

The Army of Tennessee marched north from Florence, Alabama, on November 21, and indeed managed to surprise the Union forces, the two halves of which were 75 miles (121 km) apart at Pulaski, Tennessee and at Nashville. With a series of fast marches that covered 70 miles (110 km) in three days, Hood tried to maneuver between the two armies to destroy each in detail. But Union general Schofield, commanding Stanley's IV Corps as well as his own XXIII Corps, reacted correctly with a rapid retreat from Pulaski to Columbia, which held an important bridge over the Duck River on the turnpike north. Despite suffering losses from MGEN Nathan Bedford Forrest's cavalry along the way, the Federals were able to reach Columbia and erect fortifications just hours before the Confederates arrived on November 24. From November 24 to 29, Schofield managed to block Hood at this crossing, and the "Battle of Columbia" was a series of mostly bloodless skirmishes and artillery bombardments while both sides re-gathered their armies.[10]

On November 28, Thomas directed Schofield to begin preparations for a withdrawal north to Franklin. He was incorrectly expecting that MGEN A. J. Smith's XVI Corps arrival from Missouri was imminent and he wanted the combined force to defend against Hood on the line of the Harpeth River at Franklin instead of the Duck River at Columbia. Meanwhile, early on the morning of November 29, Hood sent Benjamin F. Cheatham's and Alexander P. Stewart's corps north on a flanking march. They crossed the Duck River at Davis's Ford east of Columbia, while two divisions of Stephen D. Lee's corps and most of the army's artillery remained on the southern bank to deceive Schofield into thinking a general assault was planned against Columbia.[11]

Now that Hood had outflanked him by noon on November 29, Schofield's army was in critical danger. His command was split at that time between his supply wagons and artillery and part of the IV Corps, which he had sent to Spring Hill nearly ten miles north of Columbia, and the rest of the IV and XXIII corps marching from Columbia to join them. In the Battle of Spring Hill that afternoon and night, Hood had a golden opportunity to intercept and destroy the Union troops and their supply wagons, as his forces had already reached the turnpike separating the Union forces by nightfall. However, because of a series of command failures along with Hood's premature confidence that he had trapped Schofield, the Confederates failed to stop or even inflict much damage to the Union forces during the night.

Schofield was criticized by the Lost Cause myth for moving slowly in reaction to Hood and being only lucky to escape, but his subordinates defended his reaction as a careful balance between the safety of his army and his mission to delay Hood from striking Nashville before Thomas had amassed all his forces.[12][note 3] Through decisive leadership and good luck, both the Union infantry and supply train managed to pass Spring Hill unscathed by dawn on November 29, and soon occupied the town of Franklin 12 miles (19 km) to the north.[14] That morning, Hood was surprised and furious to discover Schofield's unexpected escape. Hood ordered his army to resume its pursuit north to Franklin.[15]

Union defensive plans edit

Schofield's advance guard arrived in Franklin at about 4:30 a.m. on November 30, after a forced march north from Spring Hill. Brigadier General (BGEN) Jacob Cox, commander of the 3rd Division, temporarily assumed command of the XXIII Corps and immediately began preparing strong defensive positions around the deteriorated entrenchments originally constructed for a previous engagement in 1863.[16][17]

Schofield decided to defend at Franklin with his back to the river because he had no pontoon bridges available that would enable his men to cross the river. The bridges had been left behind in his retreat from Columbia because they lacked wagons to transport them, and pontoons requested from Thomas in Nashville had not arrived. Schofield needed time to repair the permanent bridges spanning the river—a burned wagon bridge and an intact railroad bridge. He ordered his engineers to rebuild the wagon bridge and to lay planking over the undamaged railroad bridge to enable it to carry wagons and troops. His supply train parked in the side streets to keep the main pike open, while wagons continued to cross the river, first via a ford next to the burned-out pike bridge, and later in the afternoon by the two makeshift bridges. By the beginning of the assault, nearly all the supply wagons were across the Harpeth and on the road to Nashville.[18]

By noon, the Union works were ready.[19] The line, based on the prior year's fortifications, formed an approximate semicircle around the town from northwest to southeast. The other half of the circle was the Harpeth River. Counterclockwise from the northwest were the divisions of Kimball (IV Corps), Ruger (XXIII Corps), and Reilly (XXIII Corps). There was a gap in the line where the Columbia Pike (present day U.S. Route 31) entered the outskirts of the town, left open to allow passage of the wagons. About 200 feet (61 m) behind this gap, a 150-yard "retrenchment" line was constructed of dirt and rails, which was intended to be a barrier to traffic, not a full-fledged defensive earthwork. (The gap was also defended by the guns of Battery A, 1st Kentucky Artillery. The men of the 44th Missouri also extended the retrenchment line to the west along their front with hastily dug trenches.) The actual earthworks in the southern portion of the line were formidable. Attacking infantry would be confronted by a ditch about four feet wide and two to three feet deep, then a wall of earth and wooden fence rails four feet above normal ground level, and finally a trench three to four feet deep in which the defenders stood, aiming their weapons through narrow "head gaps" formed by logs. In the southeast portion of the line, Osage-orange shrubs formed an almost impenetrable abatis. Just behind the center of the line stood the Carter House, appropriated as Cox's headquarters. Just east of the pike was the Carter cotton gin building, around which a minor salient occurred in the Union earthworks. Schofield established his headquarters in the Alpheus Truett House, a half mile north of the Harpeth on the Nashville Pike, although he would spend most of his time during the battle in Fort Granger, built in 1863 as an artillery position northeast of the town.[20]

Two Union brigades were positioned about a half mile forward of the main line. George D. Wagner's division[note 4] had been the last to arrive from Spring Hill, and after briefly stopping at Winstead Hill before Hood arrived, he ordered his brigades under COLs Emerson Opdycke, John Q. Lane, and Joseph Conrad (who had replaced Luther Bradley, wounded at Spring Hill) to stop halfway to the Union line and dig in as best they could on the flat ground. Stanley had earlier ordered Wagner to hold Winstead Hill with two brigades and relieve Opdycke (who had been the tail end of the rear guard) until dark unless he was pressed,[22] and it is possible that Wagner somehow translated these orders into the notion that he was supposed to hold a line south of the main position with all his division. Opdycke considered Wagner's order to be ridiculous and had already been directed by Stanley to retire within the works;[22] he marched his brigade through the Union line and into a reserve position behind the gap through which the Columbia Pike passed.[23] At 12:00, when the other U.S. forces had finished their fortifications, these two brigades had not even started digging in.[19][note 5] Conrad's and Lane's brigades had few entrenching tools and used mainly bayonets, cups, and their hands.[21]

Wood's division of IV Corps and all of Wilson's cavalry were posted north of the Harpeth to watch for any flanking attempt. Schofield planned to withdraw his infantry across the river by 18:00. if Hood had not arrived by then. As Hood approached, Schofield initially assumed the Confederates were demonstrating as they had at Columbia, planning to cross the Harpeth and turn the Union position. He did not suspect that Hood would be rash enough to attack the strong defensive line.[25]

Hood's arrival and plan edit

 
View north from Hood's headquarters on Winstead Hill (engraving from Battles and Leaders of the Civil War)

Hood's army began to arrive on Winstead Hill, two miles (3 km) south of Franklin, around 13:00 Hood ordered a frontal assault in the dwindling afternoon light—sunset would be at 16:34 that day—against the Union force, a decision that caused dismay among his top generals. Forrest argued unsuccessfully that if he were given a division of infantry to accompany his cavalry, he could flank Schofield out of his position "within an hour." Frank Cheatham told Hood, "I do not like the looks of this fight; the enemy has an excellent position and is well fortified." But Hood countered that he would rather fight a Federal force that had had only a few hours to build defenses, instead of Nashville where "they have been strengthening themselves for three years." Patrick Cleburne observed the enemy fortifications as being formidable, but he told the commanding general that he would either take the enemy's works or fall in the attempt.[note 6] He later remarked to Brigadier General (BGEN) Daniel C. Govan, "Well, Govan, if we are to die, let us die like men."[27]

I hereupon decided, before the enemy would be able to reach his stronghold at Nashville, to make that same afternoon another and final effort to overtake and rout him, and drive him in the Big Harpeth river at Franklin, since I could no longer hope to get between him and Nashville, by reason of the short distance from Franklin to that city, and the advantage which the Federals enjoyed in the possession of the direct road.

LTG John Bell Hood, Advance and Retreat[28]

Some popular histories assert that Hood acted rashly in a fit of rage, resentful that the Federal army had slipped past his troops the night before at Spring Hill and that he wanted to discipline his army by ordering them to assault against strong odds. Recent scholarship discounts this as unlikely, as it was not only militarily foolish, but Hood was observed to be determined, not angry, by the time he arrived in Franklin.[29][note 7] His move was very much in keeping with the behavior of Lee and his subordinates in the Army of Northern Virginia in that aggressive action frequently gains one the initiative in combat.[31]

Regardless of Hood's personal motivations, his specific objective was to try to crush Schofield before he and his troops could escape to Nashville. He was concerned that if he attempted to turn Schofield by crossing the Harpeth and getting between him and Nashville, the maneuver would be time-consuming and the open terrain of the area would reveal his movements prematurely, causing Schofield to simply withdraw again.[29] The Confederates began moving forward at 16:00, with Cheatham's corps on the left of the assault and Stewart's on the right. Bate's division, on the left, was delayed in reaching its starting point as it marched around Winstead Hill, a movement that delayed the start of the entire army. Hood divided Forrest's cavalry—Chalmer's division on the far left, beyond Bate, and Buford and Jackson with Forrest, covering Stewart and facing the fords on the Harpeth. Lee's corps, and almost all of the army's artillery, had not yet arrived from Columbia. Hood's attacking force, about 19–20,000 men, was arguably understrength for the mission he assigned—traversing two miles (3 km) of open ground with only two batteries of artillery support and then assaulting prepared fortifications.[32]

Opposing forces edit

Union edit

Principal Union commanders

MGEN John M. Schofield, commander of the Army of the Ohio, led a force of about 27,000 consisting of:

Confederate edit

Principal Confederate commanders

LTG John Bell Hood's[35] [note 9] Army of Tennessee, at 39,000 men, constituted the second-largest remaining army of the Confederacy, ranking in strength only after Gen. Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. The army consisted of the corps of:

At Franklin, about 27,000 Confederates were engaged, primarily from the corps of Cheatham, Stewart, and Forrest, and Johnson's division of Lee's corps.[1]

Battle edit

Initial contact edit

 
Hood's approach and attacks against Wagner's advanced line
  Confederate
  Union
 
Confederate attacks and Opdycke's counterattack, 16:30–19:00.

Hood's attack initially enveloped the 3,000 men in two brigades under Lane and Conrad, which attempted to stand their ground behind inadequate fieldworks and without anchored flanks, but quickly collapsed under the pressure. As Wagner exhorted his men to stand fast, they let loose a single strong volley of rifle fire, and a two-gun section of Battery G, 1st Ohio Light Artillery, fired canister, but then many of the veteran soldiers of the two brigades stampeded back on the Columbia Pike to the main breastworks, while some untried replacements were reluctant to move under fire and were captured. Nearly 700 of Wagner's men were taken prisoner. The fleeing troops were closely pursued by the Confederates, and a cry was repeated along the line, "Go into the works with them." The pursued and pursuers were so intermingled that defenders in the breastworks had to hold their fire to avoid hitting their comrades.[37]

Breakthrough and repulse in the Federal center edit

The Union's momentary inability to defend the opening in the works caused a weak spot in its line at the Columbia Pike from the Carter House to the cotton gin. The Confederate divisions of Cleburne, Brown, and French converged on this front and a number of their troops broke through the now not-so-solid Federal defenses on either side.[38][39][40] The 100th Ohio Infantry, of Reilly's brigade, was driven back from its position to the east of the pike and Colonel (COL) Silas A. Strickland's brigade (Ruger's division) was forced to withdraw back to the Carter House. The left wing of the 72nd Illinois Infantry was swept away and rallied on the 183rd Ohio Infantry, in reserve at the retrenchment, which prompted the remainder of the 72nd to withdraw back to that line. In a matter of minutes, the Confederates had penetrated 50 yards deep into the center of the Federal line.[41]

As the Confederates poured men into the breach, reserve regiments on both sides of the pike, the 44th Missouri and 100th Ohio stood their ground, but were in danger of being overwhelmed. At this time, Emerson Opdycke's brigade was in reserve, positioned in columns of regiments facing north in a meadow about 200 yards north of the Carter House. Opdycke quickly repositioned his veterans into line of battle, straddling the road, and they were confronted by masses of fleeing Union soldiers, pursued by Confederates. Opdycke ordered his brigade forward to the works. At the same time, his corps commander, David Stanley, arrived on the scene. He later wrote, "I saw Opdycke near the center of his line urging his men forward. I gave the Colonel no orders as I saw him engaged in doing the very thing to save us, to get possession of our line again." As he rode forward, Stanley had his horse shot out from under him and a bullet passed through the back of his neck, putting him temporarily out of action.[42]

At the same time as Opdycke's counterattack west of the pike, the reserve elements of Reilly's division (the 12th Kentucky Infantry, 16th Kentucky Infantry, and 175th Ohio Infantry Regiment[note 10]) had stood their ground and served as a rally line for survivors of Strickland's and Wagner's divisions.[22] Together they sealed the breach. Hand-to-hand fighting around the Carter House and the pike was furious and desperate, employing such weapons as bayonets, rifle butts, entrenching tools, axes, and picks.[44] When they ran out of cannonballs, they began to use pine cones from the surrounding trees.[citation needed]

For years afterward, the ferocity of the combat at extremely close quarters made the battle stand out in many of the veterans' memories. The historian, Jonathan Steplyk noted that the involvement of the field officers alongside their troops in the "frenzied brawl" showed the desperation with which they fought as regimental officers were normally expected to lead and inspire their men instead of getting directly involved. Many a field-grade officer in the U.S. forces actually used their swords as weapons that day. After having his horse shot out from under him and taking a bullet, Arthur MacArthur ran through a Confederate major who had just shot him in the chest.[45] Opdycke riding his horse emptied his pistol at the Rebels and then dismounted to use it as club until it broke; grabbing a musket, he began clubbing the enemy with that.[45] Steplyk writes that a reason the combat may have stood out so vividly for veterans was because the closeness was so exceptional; many of the Army of the Ohio and the Army of Tennessee had fought since Shiloh, but this combat was the first time they saw the bayonet and musket butt used with such abandon.[45]

Firing continued around the Carter house and gardens for hours. Many in Brown's division were driven back to the Federal earthworks, where many were pinned down for the remainder of the evening, unable to either advance or flee. Each side fired through embrasures or over the top of the parapets at close range in an attempt to dislodge the other. Brown's division suffered significant losses, including Brown, who was wounded, and all four of his brigade commanders were casualties. Brown's brigade under BGEN George W. Gordon had angled to the right during the advance, joining Cleburne's division to the east of the pike. Their attack near the cotton gin was driven back from the breastworks and was then subjected to devastating cross fire from Reilly's brigade to their front and the brigade of COL John S. Casement, on Reilly's right. Cleburne was killed in the attack and 14 of his brigade and regimental commanders were casualties.[46]

That some Union troops were armed with Spencer and Henry repeating rifles added to the otherwise considerable advantages of the defenders. Near the Carter House, 350 men of the 12th Kentucky and 65th Illinois fired 16-shot, lever-action Henry rifles, the predecessors to the Winchester repeating rifle. These rifles, capable of at least 15 to 30 shots per minute, which gave these men several times more firepower than typical infantrymen with the more common muzzle-loading rifle-muskets.[47]

Repulse on the Federal left edit

While fighting raged at the center of the Union line, the Confederates of Stewart's corps also advanced against the Union left. Because the Harpeth River flowed in that area from southeast to northwest, the brigade found itself moving through a space getting progressively narrower, squeezing brigades together into a compressed front, delaying their movements and reducing their unit cohesion. Walthall's division was pressured so much from the right that it temporarily fell in front of Cleburne's advance. They were all subjected to fierce artillery fire not only from the main Union line, but also from the batteries across the river at Fort Granger. They also had significant difficulty pushing through the strong osage-orange abatis.[48] Loring's division launched two attacks against the Union brigade of COL Israel N. Stiles and both were repulsed with heavy losses. Artillery firing canister rounds directly down the railroad cut prevented any attempt to flank the Union position. BGEN John Adams attempted to rally his brigade by galloping his horse directly onto the earthworks. As he attempted to seize the flag of the 65th Illinois, he and his horse were both shot and killed. The brigade of BGEN Winfield S. Featherston began falling back under heavy fire when its division commander, MGEN William W. Loring, confronted them, shouting, "Great God. Do I command cowards?" He attempted to inspire his men by sitting on his horse in full view of the Federal lines for over a minute and amazingly emerged unharmed, but the brigade made no further progress.[49]

Walthall's division, intermixed partially with Loring's division because of the confusion that resulted from the narrow space, struck Casement's and Reilly's brigades in multiple waves of brigade assaults—probably as many as six distinct attacks. All of these assaults were turned back with heavy losses. The brigade of BGEN William A. Quarles was able to push through the abatis and reached the Federal earthworks, where it was pinned down by murderous crossfire. Quarles was wounded in the left arm and at the end of the battle the highest-ranking officer standing in his brigade was a captain.[50]

Failures on the Confederate left and center edit

MGEN William B. Bate's division had a long distance to march to reach its assigned objective on the Union right and when he gave the final order to attack it was almost dark. First contact with the enemy came around the Everbright Mansion, the home of Rebecca Bostick, and the Confederates pushed aside Union sharpshooters and swept past the house. However, Bate's left flank was not being protected as he expected by Chalmers's cavalry division, and they received enfilade fire. To protect the flank, Bate ordered the Florida Brigade, temporarily commanded by COL Robert Bullock, to move from its reserve position to his left flank. This not only delayed the advance, but provided only a single line to attack the Union fortifications, leaving no reserve. Chalmers's troopers had actually engaged the Federal right by this time (the brigades of COL Isaac M. Kirby and BGEN Walter C. Whitaker of Kimball's division), fighting dismounted, but Bate was unaware of it because the two forces were separated by rolling ground and orchards. Neither Bate nor Chalmers made any progress and they withdrew.[51]

Hood, who remained at his headquarters on Winstead Hill, was still convinced that he could pierce the Federal line. At about 19:00, he deployed the only division of Stephen D. Lee's corps that had arrived, commanded by MGEN Edward "Allegheny" Johnson, to assist Cheatham's effort. They moved north on the west side of the Columbia Turnpike and passed around Privet Knob, Cheatham's headquarters, but were unfamiliar with the terrain in the dark and Cheatham told Lee he had no staff officer left who could guide them. Both Bate and Cheatham warned Lee not to fire indiscriminately against the Federal works because Confederates were pinned down there on the outside. Johnson's men lost their unit alignments in the dark and had significant difficulties attacking the works just to the west of the Carter House. They were repulsed after a single assault with heavy losses.[52]

Cavalry actions edit

In addition to Chalmers's actions in the west, across the river to the east Confederate cavalry commander Forrest attempted to turn the Union left. His two divisions on Stewart's right (BGENs Abraham Buford II and William H. Jackson) engaged some Federal cavalry pickets and pushed them back. They crossed the Harpeth at Hughes Ford, about 3 miles (4.8 km) upstream from Franklin. When Union cavalry commander BGEN James H. Wilson learned at 15:00 that Forrest was crossing the river, he ordered his division under BGEN Edward Hatch to move south from his position on the Brentwood Turnpike and attack Forrest from the front. He ordered BGEN John T. Croxton's brigade to move against Forrest's flank and held COL Thomas J. Harrison's brigade in reserve. The dismounted cavalrymen of Hatch's division charged the Confederate cavalrymen, also dismounted, and drove them back across the river. Some of Croxton's men were armed with seven-shot Spencer carbines, which had a devastating effect on the Confederate line. Wilson was proud of his men's accomplishment because this was the first time that Forrest had been defeated by a smaller force in a standup fight during the war.[53]

Aftermath edit

The annals of war may long be searched for a parallel to the desperate valor of the charge of the Army of Tennessee at Franklin, a charge which has been called "the greatest drama in American history." Perhaps its only rival for macabre distinction would be Pickett's Charge at Gettysburg. A comparison of the two may be of interest. Pickett's total loss at Gettysburg was 1,354 (this is not an accurate number, the number of casualties during Pickett's Charge actually exceeded 6500 in less than an hour); at Franklin the Army of Tennessee lost over 6,000 dead and wounded. Pickett's charge was made after a volcanic artillery preparation of two hours had battered the defending line. Hood's army charged without any preparation. Pickett's charge was across an open space of perhaps a mile. The advance at Franklin was for two miles in the open, in full view of the enemy's works, and exposed to their fire. The defenders at Gettysburg were protected only by a stone wall. Schofield's men at Franklin had carefully constructed works, with trench and parapet. Pickett's charge was totally repulsed. The charge of Brown and Cleburne penetrated deep into the breastworks, to part of which they clung until the enemy retired. Pickett, once repelled, retired from the field. The Army of Tennessee renewed their charge, time after time. Pickett survived his charge unscathed. Cleburne was killed, and eleven other general officers were killed, wounded or captured. "Pickett's charge at Gettysburg" has come to be a synonym for unflinching courage in the raw. The slaughter-pen at Franklin even more deserves the gory honor.

Stanley F. Horn, The Army of Tennessee[54] [note 11]

Following the failure of Johnson's assault, Hood decided to end offensive actions for the evening and began to plan for a resumed series of attacks in the morning. Schofield ordered his infantry to cross the river, starting at 23:00, despite objections from Cox that withdrawal was no longer necessary and that Hood was weakened and should be counter-attacked. Schofield had received orders from Thomas to evacuate earlier that day—before Hood's attack began—and he was happy to take advantage of them despite the changed circumstances. Although there was a period in which the Union army was vulnerable, outside its works and straddling the river, Hood did not attempt to take advantage of it during the night. The Union army began entering the breastworks at Nashville at noon on December 1, with Hood's damaged army in pursuit.[55]

The damaged Confederate force was left in control of Franklin, but its enemy had escaped again. Although he had briefly come close to breaking through in the vicinity of the Columbia Turnpike, Hood was unable to destroy Schofield or prevent his withdrawal to link up with Thomas in Nashville. And his unsuccessful result came with a frightful cost. The Union commanding general claimed that the Confederates suffered 6,252 casualties, including 1,750 killed and 3,800 wounded, but this is not corroborated by Confederate reports. An estimated 2,000 others suffered less serious wounds and returned to duty before the Battle of Nashville.

More importantly, the military leadership in the West was decimated, including the loss of perhaps the best division commander of either side, Patrick Cleburne, who was killed in action. Fourteen Confederate generals (six killed, seven wounded, and one captured) and 55 regimental commanders were casualties. Five generals killed in action at Franklin were Cleburne, John Adams, Hiram B. Granbury, States Rights Gist, and Otho F. Strahl. A sixth general, John C. Carter, was mortally wounded and died later on December 10. The wounded generals were John C. Brown, Francis M. Cockrell, Zachariah C. Deas, Arthur M. Manigault, Thomas M. Scott, and Jacob H. Sharp. One general, BGEN George W. Gordon, was captured.[56][note 12] Also among the dead was Tod Carter, the middle child of the Carter family. Having enlisted in the Confederate army three years earlier, Carter had returned to his hometown for the first time since then, only to be wounded in battle just a few hundred yards away from his own house. He was found by his family after the battle, and died early in the next day.[57]

Historian Andrew Bledsoe writes that the "wastage" of the officer corps "irreparably harmed [Hood's] army's morale, disrupted its command structure, and deprived it of talented and experienced commanders.""[58] He further cites the timing of the attack, just before twilight, as a key factor combined with the fact that most officers were mounted to preserve their command and control in the fading light, a "result of logical, and terrible, deliberation".[59]

Union losses were reported as only 189 killed, 1,033 wounded, and 1,104 missing. It is possible that the number of casualties was under-reported by Schofield because of the confusion during his army's hasty nighttime evacuation of Franklin.[note 13] The Union wounded were left behind in Franklin. Many of the prisoners, including all captured wounded and medical personnel, were recovered on December 18 when Union forces re-entered Franklin in pursuit of Hood.

The Army of Tennessee was badly damaged at Franklin. Nevertheless, rather than retreat and risk the army dissolving through desertions, Hood advanced his 26,500 man force against the Union army now combined under Thomas, firmly entrenched at Nashville which numbered more than 60,000. Hood and his department commander Gen. P.G.T. Beauregard requested reinforcements, but none were available. Strongly outnumbered and exposed to the elements, Hood was attacked by Thomas on December 15–16 at the Battle of Nashville,[60] defeated decisively and pursued aggressively, retreating to Mississippi with just under 20,000 men. The Army of Tennessee never fought again as an effective force and Hood's career was ruined.[61]

Perhaps surprisingly, some Confederate soldiers claimed that Franklin was a victory. James Lanning of the 25th Alabama Infantry wrote in his diary, “victory is ours but very dearly bought.” Confederate artilleryman William Ritter believed, “the charge was a brilliant one and was successful, as part of the enemy’s line was captured.” Joseph Boyce of the 1st Missouri Infantry acknowledged that many men considered Franklin a victory for the Confederate army since it held the battlefield at the end of the fighting. However, Boyce, who was wounded at Franklin, also noted “two such victories will wipe out any army.”[62]

Hood's continued pursuit of Schofield after suffering defeat at Franklin and his refusal to withdraw before the battle of Nashville caused Schofield to remark "I doubt if any soldiers in the world ever needed more cumulative evidence to convince them that they were beaten."[57]

In his Pulitzer Prize-winning book Battle Cry of Freedom, James M. McPherson wrote, "Having proved even to Hood's satisfaction that they could assault breastworks, the Army of Tennessee had shattered itself beyond the possibility of ever doing so again.[63] David J. Eicher wrote that Hood "had in effect mortally wounded his army at Franklin."[1]

Battlefield today edit

 
Preserved areas of the Franklin battlefield around the Union defensive line
 
2010 Civil War reenactment, Carter House

The Carter House, which stands today and is open to visitors, was located at the center of the Union position. The site covers about 15 acres (61,000 m2). The house and outbuildings still show hundreds of bullet holes. The Carnton Plantation, home to the McGavock family during the battle, also still stands and is likewise open to the public. The Carnton Plantation home was one of 44 Franklin homes serving as a hospital, often with 30 wounded in each small room of the house. Confederate soldiers of Stewart's Corps swept past Carnton toward the left wing of the Union army and the house and outbuildings were converted into the largest field hospital present after the battle. Adjacent to Carnton is the McGavock Confederate Cemetery, where 1,481 Southern soldiers killed in the battle are buried. Adjacent to the 48 acres (19 ha) surrounding Carnton is another 110 acres (45 ha) of battlefield, formerly the Franklin Country Club golf course, which is currently being converted to a city park.[64]

Much of the rest of the Franklin battlefield has been lost to commercial development. The spot where Gen. Cleburne fell, for instance, was covered until late 2005 by a Pizza Hut restaurant. City officials and historic-preservation groups have recently placed a new emphasis on saving what remains of the land over which the battle raged.

In 2006, 0.5 acres (0.20 ha) of land bordering the southwestern end of the Carter House property was acquired with help of the American Battlefield Trust and local organizations. This land was part of 2 acres (0.81 ha) that made up the Carter Family Garden, which during the battle saw tremendous fighting and was part of a brief Confederate breakthrough. After the purchase, a house, out-buildings, and a swimming pool were removed. During excavation of the original Federal entrenchments some human bones were found.

Starting in 2005, the area around the intersection of Columbia Ave. and Cleburne St. has seen a serious renewed effort to reclaim that area to be the heart of a future battlefield park. The location of the former Pizza Hut is now the home to Cleburne Park. The property where the Carter Cotton Gin was located during the battle was purchased in 2005. In 2008 the property behind this location and where the Federal line crossed Columbia Ave. was purchased and in May 2010 the property east of the Gin location and where part of the Gin may have stood was also purchased. All these locations have houses on them that will be either sold and moved or torn down. Preservation organizations plan to reconstruct both the Carter Cotton Gin and some of the Federal entrenchments.[65]

On November 24, 2010, the State of Tennessee awarded a $960,000 enhancement grant from the Tennessee Department of Transportation to help purchase the property where the Domino's Pizza and mini-mart is located. A local preservation organization is also hoping to purchase 16 acres of land in two parcels: five acres located southwest of what is now a small park called the Collin's Farm located at the southeast corner of the Lewisburg Pike and the Nashville and Decatur Railroad that was preserved a few years ago; and 11 acres located near the corner of Lewisburg Pike and Carnton Lane.[66] The American Battlefield Trust and its federal, state and local partners have acquired and preserved more than 180 acres (0.73 km2) of the battlefield in more than a dozen different transactions since 1996[67]

Hugh A. Garland Jr., the son of slavery advocate and Andrew Jackson supporter Hugh A. Garland was a Confederate casualty in the battle.

In popular culture edit

In the book Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell, the character Rhett Butler mentions that he fought at Franklin.

See also edit

References edit

Footnotes

  1. ^ "Our loss in killed, wounded, and prisoners was 4,500."
  2. ^ "During the month of November: Killed, 1089; wounded, 3131; total, 4220. These casualties include the bloody battle of Franklin, Tenn., fought, November 30, 1864."
  3. ^ Per Cox:
    "It is necessary to keep this phase of the situation very clearly in mind ; for Schofield's critics have made the delibcratencss of his retreat a favorite point for attack ; overlooking the pressure upon him to make it still more so, and the indisputable fact that, had he hastened his movement by a single day, Thomas's concentration would have been balked by Hood's intercepting the railway trains that were bringing Steedman's two divisions from Chattanooga to Nashville."[13]
  4. ^ Wagner's division was a mix of veterans and green troops who had been recruited six to eight weeks beforehnd. Following the cues of their veteran colleagues, they were well aware of the vulnerability of their position south of the main line.[21]
  5. ^ A few days after his ill-considered position was overrun in the Confederate advance, Wagner was relieved of command at his own request. Jacobson has termed his decision to stand there "reckless discretion."[24]
  6. ^ The Lost Cause myth has ushed the narrative that Cleburne was resigned to his fate, but recently discovered papers show that according to a lot opf his peers, Cleburne felt that he and Cheatham were responsible for the failure at Spring Hill, and that Cleburne was aiming to redeem himself and his division.[26]
  7. ^ For examples of the popular view promoting Hood's anger and resentment, see Sword, McPherson & Gottlieb, and Nevin.[30]
  8. ^ Although Schofield was the commander of the Army of the Ohio through 1865, historians of the campaign do not always use this designation for the combination of corps assembled against Hood, referring in some cases only to the "Federal Army."[34]
  9. ^ At the start of the Atlanta Campaign, Hood was appointed a temporary "full" general, but this appointment was never confirmed by the Confederate Congress and was later rescinded.
  10. ^ The 175th Ohio was a green regiment that had only been formed in October 1864.[43]
  11. ^ Horn understates the losses of Pickett's Charge. Pickett's division alone suffered 2,655 casualties (498 killed, 643 wounded, 833 wounded and captured, and 681 captured, unwounded) and total Confederate losses during the three-division attack were 6,555. Thus, total casualties were somewhat comparable, although the loss in senior officers at Franklin was far worse—more so than Horn's 1941 description states.
  12. ^ Jacobson presents a full list of all of the officers who were casualties during the battle.
  13. ^ Current unpublished research by Carter House historian David Fraley has identified Union killed at Franklin to be in excess of 600 and perhaps as many as 800. However, this list may include men who had fought at Franklin and died in captivity or in the Sultana explosion in April 1865.

Citations

  1. ^ a b c d e Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 774.
  2. ^ U.S. War Dept., Official Records, Vol. 45/1, p. 654- Reports of General John B. Hood, C. S, Army, commanding Army of Tennessee, February 15, 1865, pp. 652-662
  3. ^ Foard (1892), p. 133.
  4. ^ Connelly (2001), pp. 477–478; Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), pp. 736–737; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 29–30; McPherson (1988), pp. 808; Sword (1993), pp. 45–46.
  5. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), p. 41; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), p. 179; Welcher (1989), p. 583.
  6. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), p. 180; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989); Nevin (1986), p. 82; Sword (1993), pp. 68, 72–73.
  7. ^ McPherson (1988), p. 811.
  8. ^ BoFT The Battle of Franklin.
  9. ^ McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), p. 180; Sword (1993), pp. 68–70, 74.
  10. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 770; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), pp. 181–182; Nevin (1986), p. 88; Sword (1993), pp. 93–95; Welcher (1989), p. 588.
  11. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 770; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 53, 55, 72–75; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), pp. 180–182; Nevin (1986), pp. 82–83, 88; Sword (1993), pp. 84, 89, 91; Welcher (1989), pp. 586–588.
  12. ^ Cox (1897), p. 22.
  13. ^ Cox (1897), pp. 22–23.
  14. ^ McDonough & Connelly (1983), p. 10.
  15. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 771; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 105–168; Kennedy (1998), p. 392; Sword (1993), pp. 124–154; Welcher (1989), pp. 588–590.
  16. ^ Steplyk (2016), p. 83.
  17. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 772; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 199–203; Sword (1993), pp. 159–160; Welcher (1989), pp. 590–591.
  18. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), p. 198; Sword (1993), p. 167; Welcher (1989), pp. 591–593.
  19. ^ a b Steplyk (2016), p. 85.
  20. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 772; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 208–212; Sword (1993), p. 167; Welcher (1989), p. 593.
  21. ^ a b Steplyk (2016), p. 86.
  22. ^ a b c BOFT, Franklin Myths.
  23. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 219–21, 228, 230; Sword (1993), pp. 170–171; Welcher (1989), p. 594.
  24. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), p. 230; Steplyk (2016), p. 86.
  25. ^ Sword (1993), pp. 197–98; Welcher (1989), pp. 593, 597.
  26. ^ Hood & Hood (2015), p. 238.
  27. ^ Hood (2013), p. 35; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 241–42, 247; Nevin (1986), pp. 98–100; Sword (1993), pp. 178–180; White (2019), p. 1.
  28. ^ Hood (1996), p. 291.
  29. ^ a b Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 239–240.
  30. ^ McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), pp. 188–189; Nevin (1986), pp. 95–96; Sword (1993), p. 179.
  31. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), p. 239.
  32. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 243–247; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), p. 189; Sword (1993), p. 180; Welcher (1989), p. 595.
  33. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), pp. 770, 774; Sword (1993), pp. 448–451.
  34. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 452; Welcher (1989), pp. 599, 611.
  35. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 769.
  36. ^ Sword (1993), pp. 444–47.
  37. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 259–260, 273–274, 278–282; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), pp. 189–191; Nevin (1986), p. 103; Sword (1993), pp. 189–196.
  38. ^ ABT 10 Facts: The Battle of Franklin.
  39. ^ NPS, Battle Summary: Franklin.
  40. ^ ABT Franklin: The Valley of Death.
  41. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 259–260, 273–274, 278–282; McPherson & Gottlieb (1989), p. 191; Nevin (1986), p. 105; Sword (1993), pp. 194–196; Welcher (1989), p. 595.
  42. ^ Foote (1974), p. 673; Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 319–328; Nevin (1986), p. 112; Sword (1993), pp. 199–206; Welcher (1989), p. 595.
  43. ^ ABT Baptism of Fire, An Interview with Eric Jacobson.
  44. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 3328–29, 322; Nevin (1986), p. 112; Welcher (1989), pp. 595–596.
  45. ^ a b c Steplyk (2016), p. 92.
  46. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 323, 308, 315, 310, 286; Nevin (1986), pp. 114–115; Sword (1993), pp. 221–224; Welcher (1989), p. 596.
  47. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 286–287, 329–330.
  48. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 244, 262, 285; Sword (1993), p. 292; Welcher (1989), pp. 596–597.
  49. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 299–305, 339–343; Nevin (1986), pp. 114–115; Sword (1993), pp. 216–218, 226–227.
  50. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 292–293; Sword (1993), pp. 218–219; Welcher (1989), p. 597.
  51. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 356–358; Sword (1993), pp. 238–242.
  52. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 377–385; Sword (1993), pp. 245–247.
  53. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 358–363; Sword (1993), p. 241; Welcher (1989), p. 598.
  54. ^ Horn (1941), pp. 402–403.
  55. ^ Nevin (1986), pp. 117–118.
  56. ^ Jacobson & Rupp (2007), pp. 418–420.
  57. ^ a b CW, Ten Facts About the Battle of Franklin.
  58. ^ Bledsoe (2016), p. 67.
  59. ^ Bledsoe (2016), p. 68-69.
  60. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 776; Esposito (1959), p. 153; Kennedy (1998), p. 397; Sword (1993), p. 312; Welcher (1989), p. 602.
  61. ^ Eicher, McPherson & McPherson (2001), p. 775-780.
  62. ^ Thrasher2021, p. 188.
  63. ^ McPherson (1988), p. 813.
  64. ^ NPS, CWSAC report update.
  65. ^ Brentwood, Carter Cotton Gin.
  66. ^ Tennessean, Small strip mall, Domino's Pizza.
  67. ^ ABT, Franklin Battlefield.

Bibliography

  • Bledsoe, Andrew S. (2016). "The Destruction of the Army of Tennessee's Officer Corps at the Battle of Franklin". In Woodworth, Steven E.; Grear, Charles D. (eds.). The Tennessee Campaign of 1864 (PDF). Civil War Campaigns in the Heartland (1st ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 66–80. ISBN 978-0-8093-3453-7. OCLC 934434159.
  • Connelly, Thomas Lawrence (2001). Autumn of Glory: The Army of Tennessee, 1862--1865. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2738-4. OCLC 47948904.
  • Eicher, David J.; McPherson, James M.; McPherson, James Alan (2001). The Longest Night: A Military History of the Civil War (PDF) (1st ed.). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. p. 990. ISBN 978-0-7432-1846-7. LCCN 2001034153. OCLC 231931020. Retrieved July 6, 2020.
  • Esposito, Vincent J. (1959). West Point Atlas of American Wars. New York, NY: Frederick A. Praeger Publishers. ISBN 978-0-8050-3391-5. OCLC 60298522. Retrieved July 6, 2020.
  • Foard, A. J. (1892). "Report of Surgeon A. J. Foard, Medical Director, Army of Tennessee". Minutes of the Third Annual Meeting and Reunion. Richmond, VA: United Confederate Veterans. 3: 133.
  • Hood, Stephen M. (2013). John Bell Hood: The Rise, Fall, and Resurrection of a Confederate General. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie. p. 335. ISBN 978-1-61121-140-5. OCLC 818954790.
  • Hood, John Bell; Hood, Stephen M. (2015). The Lost Papers of Confederate General John Bell Hood. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-61121-182-5. OCLC 865494675.
  • Horn, Stanley F. (1941). The Army of Tennessee: A Military History. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company. p. 489. OCLC 1065174533.
  • Jacobson, Eric A.; Rupp, Richard A. (2007). For Cause & for Country: A Study of the Affair at Spring Hill & the Battle of Franklin. Franklin, TN: O'More Publishing. ISBN 978-0-9717444-4-8. OCLC 428436180.
  • Kennedy, Frances H., ed. (1998). The Civil War Battlefield Guide (Kindle) (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co. ISBN 0-395-74012-6. Retrieved June 24, 2020.
  • McPherson, James M.; Gottlieb, Richard (1989). Battle Chronicles of the Civil war. Vol. 4. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company ; Collier Macmillan Publishers. ISBN 978-0-02-920661-4. OCLC 1164541109.
  • McPherson, James M. (1988). Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (PDF). Oxford History of the United States (1st ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. p. 904. ISBN 978-0-19-503863-7. OCLC 7577667.
  • Nevin, David (1986). Sherman's March: Atlanta To The Sea. Alexandria, VA: Silver Burdett. ISBN 9780809448128. OCLC 1003113620.
  • Sword, Wiley (1993). The Confederacy's Last Hurrah: Spring Hill, Franklin, and Nashville. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. ISBN 9780700606504. OCLC 1285470936.
  • Steplyk, Jonathan M. (2016). "Killing at Franklin: Anatomy of Slaughter". In Woodworth, Steven E.; Grear, Charles D. (eds.). The Tennessee Campaign of 1864 (PDF). Civil War Campaigns in the Heartland (1st ed.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. pp. 81–104. ISBN 978-0-8093-3453-7. OCLC 934434159.
  • Thrasher, C.D. (2021). Suffering in the Army of Tennessee: A Social History of the Confederate Army of the Heartland from the Battles for Atlanta to the Retreat from Nashville. Voices of the Civil War series. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. ISBN 978-1-62190-641-4. Retrieved May 26, 2023.
  • Welcher, Frank Johnson (1989). The Western Theater. The Union Army, 1861-1865: Organization and Operations. Vol. 2. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-36454-8. OCLC 1089613807.
  • White, William Lee (2019). Let Us Die Like Men: The Battle of Franklin, November 30, 1864. El Dorado Hills, CA: Savas Beatie LLC. ISBN 978-1-61121-296-9. OCLC 1004981755.
  • "Franklin Battlefield". American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved May 17, 2023.
  • "10 Facts: The Battle of Franklin". www.battlefields.org. American Battlefield Trust. October 8, 2022. Retrieved May 28, 2023.
  • "Book: Baptism of Fire, An Interview with Eric Jacobson". www.battlefields.org. American Battlefield Trust. October 8, 2022. Retrieved May 28, 2023.
  • Cartwright, Thomas Y. (October 8, 2022). "Franklin: The Valley of Death". www.battlefields.org. American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved May 28, 2023.
  • . nps.gov. U.S. National Park Service. January 19, 2004. Archived from the original on October 6, 2014. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  • "CWSAC report update" (PDF). nps.gov. U.S. National Park Service. January 15, 2003. Retrieved September 14, 2017.
  • . civilwar.org. Archived from the original on November 4, 2016. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
  • "Carter Cotton Gin foundation unearthed during excavation". Brentwood Homepage. May 14, 2015. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
  • "Small Strip Mall, Domino's Pizza to give way to new battlefield park". tennessean.com. Tennessean. November 30, 2010. Retrieved November 3, 2016.
  • "The Battle of Franklin". The Battle of Franklin Trust. July 18, 2022. Retrieved May 31, 2023.
  • Jacobson, Eric A (May 4, 2023). Chalkboard History: Franklin Myths (YouTube). Franklin, TN: The Battle of Franklin Trust. Event occurs at 23:40. Retrieved May 31, 2023.
Memoirs and primary sources
  • Cox, Jacob D. (1897). The Battle of Franklin, Tennessee, November 30, 1864 : a monograph. New York: C. Scribner's Sons. LCCN 03026860. OCLC 559888956.
  • Hood, John Bell (1996). Advance and retreat : personal experiences in the United States and Confederate States armies. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-585-26794-4. OCLC 45727510.. First published 1880 for the Hood Orphan Memorial Fund by G.T. Beauregard.
  • U.S. War Department (1889). Operations in Kentucky, Southwest Virginia, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, and North Georgia. November 14, 1864-January 22, 1865., Part I - Reports, Union and Confederate Correspondence, etc. The War of the Rebellion: A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. Vol. XLV-LVII-I. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 53–55, 663. hdl:2027/coo.31924077743031. OCLC 857196196.  This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.

Further reading

  • Foote, Shelby (1974). The Civil War Volume III: Red River to Appomattox (Random House 2011 ed.). New York, NY: Random House. pp. 1, 120. ISBN 978-1-4090-7858-6. OCLC 1004975561.
  • McDonough, James L.; Connelly, Thomas Lawrence (1983). Five Tragic Hours: The Battle of Franklin. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press. p. 217. ISBN 978-0-87049-396-6. OCLC 10891021.
  • "Letter, Alonzo Wolverton to his sister Roseltha olverton Goble, December 4, 1864". Wolverton Family Letters. Archives of Ontario. Retrieved September 8, 2018.

External links edit

  • : , histories, photos, and preservation news (Civil War Trust)
  • Animated map of the Battle of Franklin (Civil War Trust)
  • A blog-database for descendants of the Battle of Franklin
  • Google Map of the Battle of Franklin January 8, 2021, at the Wayback Machine
  • Battle of Franklin.net
  • Animated history of the Franklin-Nashville Campaign July 8, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  • Save the Franklin Battlefield, Inc.
  • Carter House Museum
  • Carnton Plantation
  • , Tennessee Civil War Preservation Association
  • On this date in Civil War history – Battle of Franklin – November 30, 1864

battle, franklin, this, article, about, battle, 1864, minor, battle, previous, year, 1863, other, uses, disambiguation, fought, november, 1864, franklin, tennessee, part, franklin, nashville, campaign, american, civil, worst, disasters, confederate, states, ar. This article is about the battle in 1864 For the minor battle the previous year see Battle of Franklin 1863 For other uses see Battle of Franklin disambiguation The Battle of Franklin was fought on November 30 1864 in Franklin Tennessee as part of the Franklin Nashville Campaign of the American Civil War It was one of the worst disasters of the war for the Confederate States Army Confederate Lieutenant General LTG John Bell Hood s Army of Tennessee conducted numerous frontal assaults against fortified positions occupied by the Union forces under Major General MGEN John Schofield and was unable to prevent Schofield from executing a planned orderly withdrawal to Nashville Battle of FranklinPart of the American Civil WarBattle of Franklin by Kurz and Allison 1891 DateNovember 30 1864 1864 11 30 LocationFranklin Tennessee35 55 03 N 86 52 24 W 35 9174 N 86 8733 W 35 9174 86 8733ResultInconclusive Union army continues retreat to Nashville Confederate General claims victoryBelligerents United States Union Confederate StatesCommanders and leadersJohn Schofield David S StanleyJohn Bell HoodUnits involvedArmy of the OhioArmy of TennesseeStrength27 000 1 27 000 31 000 1 Casualties and losses2 326 total 189 killed 1 033 wounded 1 104 missing captured 1 Hood s report for the month of November 4 500 2 note 1 3 note 2 The Confederate assault of six infantry divisions containing eighteen brigades with 100 regiments numbering almost 20 000 men sometimes called the Pickett s Charge of the West resulted in devastating losses to the men and the leadership of the Army of Tennessee fourteen Confederate generals six killed seven wounded and one captured and 55 regimental commanders were casualties After its defeat against MGEN George H Thomas in the subsequent Battle of Nashville the Army of Tennessee retreated with barely half the men with which it had begun the short offensive and was effectively destroyed as a fighting force for the remainder of the war The 1864 Battle of Franklin was the second military action in the vicinity a battle in 1863 was a minor action associated with a reconnaissance in force by Confederate cavalry leader MGEN Earl Van Dorn on April 10 Contents 1 Background 1 1 Military situation 1 2 Road to Franklin November 21 29 1 3 Union defensive plans 1 4 Hood s arrival and plan 2 Opposing forces 2 1 Union 2 2 Confederate 3 Battle 3 1 Initial contact 3 2 Breakthrough and repulse in the Federal center 3 3 Repulse on the Federal left 3 4 Failures on the Confederate left and center 3 5 Cavalry actions 4 Aftermath 4 1 Battlefield today 5 In popular culture 6 See also 7 References 8 External linksBackground editMilitary situation edit Main articles Franklin Nashville Campaign and Battle of Spring Hill Further information Atlanta Campaign Sherman s March to the Sea Western Theater of the American Civil War and American Civil War nbsp Kentucky Northern Tennessee 1864 nbsp Southern Tennessee Alabama 1864 nbsp Map of the Franklin Nashville Campaign Confederate UnionFollowing his defeat in the Atlanta Campaign Hood had hoped to lure MGEN William T Sherman into battle by disrupting his railroad supply line from Chattanooga to Atlanta After a brief period in which he pursued Hood Sherman decided instead to cut his main army off from these lines and live off the land in his famed March to the Sea from Atlanta to Savannah By doing so he would avoid having to defend hundreds of miles of supply lines against constant raids through which he predicted he would lose a thousand men monthly and gain no result against Hood s army 4 Sherman s march left the aggressive Hood unoccupied and his Army of Tennessee had several options in attacking Sherman or falling upon his rear lines The task of defending Tennessee and the rearguard against Hood fell to MGEN George H Thomas commander of the Army of the Cumberland The principal forces available in Middle Tennessee were IV Corps of the Army of the Cumberland commanded by MGEN David S Stanley and XXIII Corps of the Army of the Ohio commanded by MGEN John Schofield with a total strength of about 30 000 Another 30 000 troops under Thomas s command were in or moving toward Nashville 5 Rather than trying to chase Sherman in Georgia Hood decided that he would attempt a major offensive northward even though his invading force of 39 000 would be outnumbered by the 60 000 Union troops in Tennessee He would move north into Tennessee and try to defeat portions of Thomas s army in detail before they could concentrate seize the important manufacturing and supply center of Nashville and continue north into Kentucky possibly as far as the Ohio River 6 Hood even expected to pick up 20 000 recruits from Tennessee and Kentucky in his path of victory and then join up with Robert E Lee s army in Virginia a plan that historian James M McPherson describes as scripted in never never land 7 8 Hood had recovered from but was affected by a couple of serious physical battle wounds to a leg and arm which caused him pain and limited his mobility Hood spent the first three weeks of November quietly supplying the Army of Tennessee in northern Alabama in preparation for his offensive 9 Road to Franklin November 21 29 edit The Army of Tennessee marched north from Florence Alabama on November 21 and indeed managed to surprise the Union forces the two halves of which were 75 miles 121 km apart at Pulaski Tennessee and at Nashville With a series of fast marches that covered 70 miles 110 km in three days Hood tried to maneuver between the two armies to destroy each in detail But Union general Schofield commanding Stanley s IV Corps as well as his own XXIII Corps reacted correctly with a rapid retreat from Pulaski to Columbia which held an important bridge over the Duck River on the turnpike north Despite suffering losses from MGEN Nathan Bedford Forrest s cavalry along the way the Federals were able to reach Columbia and erect fortifications just hours before the Confederates arrived on November 24 From November 24 to 29 Schofield managed to block Hood at this crossing and the Battle of Columbia was a series of mostly bloodless skirmishes and artillery bombardments while both sides re gathered their armies 10 On November 28 Thomas directed Schofield to begin preparations for a withdrawal north to Franklin He was incorrectly expecting that MGEN A J Smith s XVI Corps arrival from Missouri was imminent and he wanted the combined force to defend against Hood on the line of the Harpeth River at Franklin instead of the Duck River at Columbia Meanwhile early on the morning of November 29 Hood sent Benjamin F Cheatham s and Alexander P Stewart s corps north on a flanking march They crossed the Duck River at Davis s Ford east of Columbia while two divisions of Stephen D Lee s corps and most of the army s artillery remained on the southern bank to deceive Schofield into thinking a general assault was planned against Columbia 11 Now that Hood had outflanked him by noon on November 29 Schofield s army was in critical danger His command was split at that time between his supply wagons and artillery and part of the IV Corps which he had sent to Spring Hill nearly ten miles north of Columbia and the rest of the IV and XXIII corps marching from Columbia to join them In the Battle of Spring Hill that afternoon and night Hood had a golden opportunity to intercept and destroy the Union troops and their supply wagons as his forces had already reached the turnpike separating the Union forces by nightfall However because of a series of command failures along with Hood s premature confidence that he had trapped Schofield the Confederates failed to stop or even inflict much damage to the Union forces during the night Schofield was criticized by the Lost Cause myth for moving slowly in reaction to Hood and being only lucky to escape but his subordinates defended his reaction as a careful balance between the safety of his army and his mission to delay Hood from striking Nashville before Thomas had amassed all his forces 12 note 3 Through decisive leadership and good luck both the Union infantry and supply train managed to pass Spring Hill unscathed by dawn on November 29 and soon occupied the town of Franklin 12 miles 19 km to the north 14 That morning Hood was surprised and furious to discover Schofield s unexpected escape Hood ordered his army to resume its pursuit north to Franklin 15 Union defensive plans edit Schofield s advance guard arrived in Franklin at about 4 30 a m on November 30 after a forced march north from Spring Hill Brigadier General BGEN Jacob Cox commander of the 3rd Division temporarily assumed command of the XXIII Corps and immediately began preparing strong defensive positions around the deteriorated entrenchments originally constructed for a previous engagement in 1863 16 17 Schofield decided to defend at Franklin with his back to the river because he had no pontoon bridges available that would enable his men to cross the river The bridges had been left behind in his retreat from Columbia because they lacked wagons to transport them and pontoons requested from Thomas in Nashville had not arrived Schofield needed time to repair the permanent bridges spanning the river a burned wagon bridge and an intact railroad bridge He ordered his engineers to rebuild the wagon bridge and to lay planking over the undamaged railroad bridge to enable it to carry wagons and troops His supply train parked in the side streets to keep the main pike open while wagons continued to cross the river first via a ford next to the burned out pike bridge and later in the afternoon by the two makeshift bridges By the beginning of the assault nearly all the supply wagons were across the Harpeth and on the road to Nashville 18 By noon the Union works were ready 19 The line based on the prior year s fortifications formed an approximate semicircle around the town from northwest to southeast The other half of the circle was the Harpeth River Counterclockwise from the northwest were the divisions of Kimball IV Corps Ruger XXIII Corps and Reilly XXIII Corps There was a gap in the line where the Columbia Pike present day U S Route 31 entered the outskirts of the town left open to allow passage of the wagons About 200 feet 61 m behind this gap a 150 yard retrenchment line was constructed of dirt and rails which was intended to be a barrier to traffic not a full fledged defensive earthwork The gap was also defended by the guns of Battery A 1st Kentucky Artillery The men of the 44th Missouri also extended the retrenchment line to the west along their front with hastily dug trenches The actual earthworks in the southern portion of the line were formidable Attacking infantry would be confronted by a ditch about four feet wide and two to three feet deep then a wall of earth and wooden fence rails four feet above normal ground level and finally a trench three to four feet deep in which the defenders stood aiming their weapons through narrow head gaps formed by logs In the southeast portion of the line Osage orange shrubs formed an almost impenetrable abatis Just behind the center of the line stood the Carter House appropriated as Cox s headquarters Just east of the pike was the Carter cotton gin building around which a minor salient occurred in the Union earthworks Schofield established his headquarters in the Alpheus Truett House a half mile north of the Harpeth on the Nashville Pike although he would spend most of his time during the battle in Fort Granger built in 1863 as an artillery position northeast of the town 20 Two Union brigades were positioned about a half mile forward of the main line George D Wagner s division note 4 had been the last to arrive from Spring Hill and after briefly stopping at Winstead Hill before Hood arrived he ordered his brigades under COLs Emerson Opdycke John Q Lane and Joseph Conrad who had replaced Luther Bradley wounded at Spring Hill to stop halfway to the Union line and dig in as best they could on the flat ground Stanley had earlier ordered Wagner to hold Winstead Hill with two brigades and relieve Opdycke who had been the tail end of the rear guard until dark unless he was pressed 22 and it is possible that Wagner somehow translated these orders into the notion that he was supposed to hold a line south of the main position with all his division Opdycke considered Wagner s order to be ridiculous and had already been directed by Stanley to retire within the works 22 he marched his brigade through the Union line and into a reserve position behind the gap through which the Columbia Pike passed 23 At 12 00 when the other U S forces had finished their fortifications these two brigades had not even started digging in 19 note 5 Conrad s and Lane s brigades had few entrenching tools and used mainly bayonets cups and their hands 21 Wood s division of IV Corps and all of Wilson s cavalry were posted north of the Harpeth to watch for any flanking attempt Schofield planned to withdraw his infantry across the river by 18 00 if Hood had not arrived by then As Hood approached Schofield initially assumed the Confederates were demonstrating as they had at Columbia planning to cross the Harpeth and turn the Union position He did not suspect that Hood would be rash enough to attack the strong defensive line 25 Hood s arrival and plan edit nbsp View north from Hood s headquarters on Winstead Hill engraving from Battles and Leaders of the Civil War Hood s army began to arrive on Winstead Hill two miles 3 km south of Franklin around 13 00 Hood ordered a frontal assault in the dwindling afternoon light sunset would be at 16 34 that day against the Union force a decision that caused dismay among his top generals Forrest argued unsuccessfully that if he were given a division of infantry to accompany his cavalry he could flank Schofield out of his position within an hour Frank Cheatham told Hood I do not like the looks of this fight the enemy has an excellent position and is well fortified But Hood countered that he would rather fight a Federal force that had had only a few hours to build defenses instead of Nashville where they have been strengthening themselves for three years Patrick Cleburne observed the enemy fortifications as being formidable but he told the commanding general that he would either take the enemy s works or fall in the attempt note 6 He later remarked to Brigadier General BGEN Daniel C Govan Well Govan if we are to die let us die like men 27 I hereupon decided before the enemy would be able to reach his stronghold at Nashville to make that same afternoon another and final effort to overtake and rout him and drive him in the Big Harpeth river at Franklin since I could no longer hope to get between him and Nashville by reason of the short distance from Franklin to that city and the advantage which the Federals enjoyed in the possession of the direct road LTG John Bell Hood Advance and Retreat 28 Some popular histories assert that Hood acted rashly in a fit of rage resentful that the Federal army had slipped past his troops the night before at Spring Hill and that he wanted to discipline his army by ordering them to assault against strong odds Recent scholarship discounts this as unlikely as it was not only militarily foolish but Hood was observed to be determined not angry by the time he arrived in Franklin 29 note 7 His move was very much in keeping with the behavior of Lee and his subordinates in the Army of Northern Virginia in that aggressive action frequently gains one the initiative in combat 31 Regardless of Hood s personal motivations his specific objective was to try to crush Schofield before he and his troops could escape to Nashville He was concerned that if he attempted to turn Schofield by crossing the Harpeth and getting between him and Nashville the maneuver would be time consuming and the open terrain of the area would reveal his movements prematurely causing Schofield to simply withdraw again 29 The Confederates began moving forward at 16 00 with Cheatham s corps on the left of the assault and Stewart s on the right Bate s division on the left was delayed in reaching its starting point as it marched around Winstead Hill a movement that delayed the start of the entire army Hood divided Forrest s cavalry Chalmer s division on the far left beyond Bate and Buford and Jackson with Forrest covering Stewart and facing the fords on the Harpeth Lee s corps and almost all of the army s artillery had not yet arrived from Columbia Hood s attacking force about 19 20 000 men was arguably understrength for the mission he assigned traversing two miles 3 km of open ground with only two batteries of artillery support and then assaulting prepared fortifications 32 Opposing forces editUnion edit Further information Union order of battle Principal Union commanders nbsp MGENJohn Schofield nbsp MGENDavid S Stanley nbsp BGENJacob D Cox nbsp MGENJames H WilsonMGEN John M Schofield commander of the Army of the Ohio led a force of about 27 000 consisting of IV Corps commanded by MGEN David S Stanley with divisions commanded by BGENs Nathan Kimball George D Wagner and Thomas J Wood XXIII Corps normally commanded by Schofield but temporarily commanded at Franklin by BGEN Jacob D Cox with divisions commanded by BGENs Thomas H Ruger and James W Reilly Cavalry Corps commanded by MGEN James H Wilson with divisions commanded by BGEN Edward M McCook Edward Hatch Richard W Johnson and Joseph F Knipe 33 note 8 Confederate edit Further information Confederate order of battle Principal Confederate commanders nbsp LTGJohn Bell Hood nbsp MGENBenjamin F Cheatham nbsp LTGStephen D Lee nbsp LTGAlexander P Stewart nbsp MGENNathan Bedford ForrestLTG John Bell Hood s 35 note 9 Army of Tennessee at 39 000 men constituted the second largest remaining army of the Confederacy ranking in strength only after Gen Robert E Lee s Army of Northern Virginia The army consisted of the corps of MGEN Benjamin F Cheatham with divisions commanded by Maj Gens Patrick R Cleburne John C Brown and William B Bate LTG Stephen D Lee with divisions commanded by Maj Gens Edward Allegheny Johnson Carter L Stevenson and Henry D Clayton Only Johnson s division played an active role at Franklin LTG Alexander P Stewart with divisions commanded by MGEN William W Loring Samuel G French and Edward C Walthall Cavalry forces under MGEN Nathan Bedford Forrest with divisions commanded by BGEN James R Chalmers Abraham Buford and William H Jackson 36 At Franklin about 27 000 Confederates were engaged primarily from the corps of Cheatham Stewart and Forrest and Johnson s division of Lee s corps 1 Battle editInitial contact edit nbsp Hood s approach and attacks against Wagner s advanced line Confederate Union nbsp Confederate attacks and Opdycke s counterattack 16 30 19 00 Hood s attack initially enveloped the 3 000 men in two brigades under Lane and Conrad which attempted to stand their ground behind inadequate fieldworks and without anchored flanks but quickly collapsed under the pressure As Wagner exhorted his men to stand fast they let loose a single strong volley of rifle fire and a two gun section of Battery G 1st Ohio Light Artillery fired canister but then many of the veteran soldiers of the two brigades stampeded back on the Columbia Pike to the main breastworks while some untried replacements were reluctant to move under fire and were captured Nearly 700 of Wagner s men were taken prisoner The fleeing troops were closely pursued by the Confederates and a cry was repeated along the line Go into the works with them The pursued and pursuers were so intermingled that defenders in the breastworks had to hold their fire to avoid hitting their comrades 37 Breakthrough and repulse in the Federal center edit The Union s momentary inability to defend the opening in the works caused a weak spot in its line at the Columbia Pike from the Carter House to the cotton gin The Confederate divisions of Cleburne Brown and French converged on this front and a number of their troops broke through the now not so solid Federal defenses on either side 38 39 40 The 100th Ohio Infantry of Reilly s brigade was driven back from its position to the east of the pike and Colonel COL Silas A Strickland s brigade Ruger s division was forced to withdraw back to the Carter House The left wing of the 72nd Illinois Infantry was swept away and rallied on the 183rd Ohio Infantry in reserve at the retrenchment which prompted the remainder of the 72nd to withdraw back to that line In a matter of minutes the Confederates had penetrated 50 yards deep into the center of the Federal line 41 As the Confederates poured men into the breach reserve regiments on both sides of the pike the 44th Missouri and 100th Ohio stood their ground but were in danger of being overwhelmed At this time Emerson Opdycke s brigade was in reserve positioned in columns of regiments facing north in a meadow about 200 yards north of the Carter House Opdycke quickly repositioned his veterans into line of battle straddling the road and they were confronted by masses of fleeing Union soldiers pursued by Confederates Opdycke ordered his brigade forward to the works At the same time his corps commander David Stanley arrived on the scene He later wrote I saw Opdycke near the center of his line urging his men forward I gave the Colonel no orders as I saw him engaged in doing the very thing to save us to get possession of our line again As he rode forward Stanley had his horse shot out from under him and a bullet passed through the back of his neck putting him temporarily out of action 42 At the same time as Opdycke s counterattack west of the pike the reserve elements of Reilly s division the 12th Kentucky Infantry 16th Kentucky Infantry and 175th Ohio Infantry Regiment note 10 had stood their ground and served as a rally line for survivors of Strickland s and Wagner s divisions 22 Together they sealed the breach Hand to hand fighting around the Carter House and the pike was furious and desperate employing such weapons as bayonets rifle butts entrenching tools axes and picks 44 When they ran out of cannonballs they began to use pine cones from the surrounding trees citation needed For years afterward the ferocity of the combat at extremely close quarters made the battle stand out in many of the veterans memories The historian Jonathan Steplyk noted that the involvement of the field officers alongside their troops in the frenzied brawl showed the desperation with which they fought as regimental officers were normally expected to lead and inspire their men instead of getting directly involved Many a field grade officer in the U S forces actually used their swords as weapons that day After having his horse shot out from under him and taking a bullet Arthur MacArthur ran through a Confederate major who had just shot him in the chest 45 Opdycke riding his horse emptied his pistol at the Rebels and then dismounted to use it as club until it broke grabbing a musket he began clubbing the enemy with that 45 Steplyk writes that a reason the combat may have stood out so vividly for veterans was because the closeness was so exceptional many of the Army of the Ohio and the Army of Tennessee had fought since Shiloh but this combat was the first time they saw the bayonet and musket butt used with such abandon 45 Firing continued around the Carter house and gardens for hours Many in Brown s division were driven back to the Federal earthworks where many were pinned down for the remainder of the evening unable to either advance or flee Each side fired through embrasures or over the top of the parapets at close range in an attempt to dislodge the other Brown s division suffered significant losses including Brown who was wounded and all four of his brigade commanders were casualties Brown s brigade under BGEN George W Gordon had angled to the right during the advance joining Cleburne s division to the east of the pike Their attack near the cotton gin was driven back from the breastworks and was then subjected to devastating cross fire from Reilly s brigade to their front and the brigade of COL John S Casement on Reilly s right Cleburne was killed in the attack and 14 of his brigade and regimental commanders were casualties 46 That some Union troops were armed with Spencer and Henry repeating rifles added to the otherwise considerable advantages of the defenders Near the Carter House 350 men of the 12th Kentucky and 65th Illinois fired 16 shot lever action Henry rifles the predecessors to the Winchester repeating rifle These rifles capable of at least 15 to 30 shots per minute which gave these men several times more firepower than typical infantrymen with the more common muzzle loading rifle muskets 47 Repulse on the Federal left edit While fighting raged at the center of the Union line the Confederates of Stewart s corps also advanced against the Union left Because the Harpeth River flowed in that area from southeast to northwest the brigade found itself moving through a space getting progressively narrower squeezing brigades together into a compressed front delaying their movements and reducing their unit cohesion Walthall s division was pressured so much from the right that it temporarily fell in front of Cleburne s advance They were all subjected to fierce artillery fire not only from the main Union line but also from the batteries across the river at Fort Granger They also had significant difficulty pushing through the strong osage orange abatis 48 Loring s division launched two attacks against the Union brigade of COL Israel N Stiles and both were repulsed with heavy losses Artillery firing canister rounds directly down the railroad cut prevented any attempt to flank the Union position BGEN John Adams attempted to rally his brigade by galloping his horse directly onto the earthworks As he attempted to seize the flag of the 65th Illinois he and his horse were both shot and killed The brigade of BGEN Winfield S Featherston began falling back under heavy fire when its division commander MGEN William W Loring confronted them shouting Great God Do I command cowards He attempted to inspire his men by sitting on his horse in full view of the Federal lines for over a minute and amazingly emerged unharmed but the brigade made no further progress 49 Walthall s division intermixed partially with Loring s division because of the confusion that resulted from the narrow space struck Casement s and Reilly s brigades in multiple waves of brigade assaults probably as many as six distinct attacks All of these assaults were turned back with heavy losses The brigade of BGEN William A Quarles was able to push through the abatis and reached the Federal earthworks where it was pinned down by murderous crossfire Quarles was wounded in the left arm and at the end of the battle the highest ranking officer standing in his brigade was a captain 50 Failures on the Confederate left and center edit MGEN William B Bate s division had a long distance to march to reach its assigned objective on the Union right and when he gave the final order to attack it was almost dark First contact with the enemy came around the Everbright Mansion the home of Rebecca Bostick and the Confederates pushed aside Union sharpshooters and swept past the house However Bate s left flank was not being protected as he expected by Chalmers s cavalry division and they received enfilade fire To protect the flank Bate ordered the Florida Brigade temporarily commanded by COL Robert Bullock to move from its reserve position to his left flank This not only delayed the advance but provided only a single line to attack the Union fortifications leaving no reserve Chalmers s troopers had actually engaged the Federal right by this time the brigades of COL Isaac M Kirby and BGEN Walter C Whitaker of Kimball s division fighting dismounted but Bate was unaware of it because the two forces were separated by rolling ground and orchards Neither Bate nor Chalmers made any progress and they withdrew 51 Hood who remained at his headquarters on Winstead Hill was still convinced that he could pierce the Federal line At about 19 00 he deployed the only division of Stephen D Lee s corps that had arrived commanded by MGEN Edward Allegheny Johnson to assist Cheatham s effort They moved north on the west side of the Columbia Turnpike and passed around Privet Knob Cheatham s headquarters but were unfamiliar with the terrain in the dark and Cheatham told Lee he had no staff officer left who could guide them Both Bate and Cheatham warned Lee not to fire indiscriminately against the Federal works because Confederates were pinned down there on the outside Johnson s men lost their unit alignments in the dark and had significant difficulties attacking the works just to the west of the Carter House They were repulsed after a single assault with heavy losses 52 Cavalry actions edit In addition to Chalmers s actions in the west across the river to the east Confederate cavalry commander Forrest attempted to turn the Union left His two divisions on Stewart s right BGENs Abraham Buford II and William H Jackson engaged some Federal cavalry pickets and pushed them back They crossed the Harpeth at Hughes Ford about 3 miles 4 8 km upstream from Franklin When Union cavalry commander BGEN James H Wilson learned at 15 00 that Forrest was crossing the river he ordered his division under BGEN Edward Hatch to move south from his position on the Brentwood Turnpike and attack Forrest from the front He ordered BGEN John T Croxton s brigade to move against Forrest s flank and held COL Thomas J Harrison s brigade in reserve The dismounted cavalrymen of Hatch s division charged the Confederate cavalrymen also dismounted and drove them back across the river Some of Croxton s men were armed with seven shot Spencer carbines which had a devastating effect on the Confederate line Wilson was proud of his men s accomplishment because this was the first time that Forrest had been defeated by a smaller force in a standup fight during the war 53 Aftermath editThe annals of war may long be searched for a parallel to the desperate valor of the charge of the Army of Tennessee at Franklin a charge which has been called the greatest drama in American history Perhaps its only rival for macabre distinction would be Pickett s Charge at Gettysburg A comparison of the two may be of interest Pickett s total loss at Gettysburg was 1 354 this is not an accurate number the number of casualties during Pickett s Charge actually exceeded 6500 in less than an hour at Franklin the Army of Tennessee lost over 6 000 dead and wounded Pickett s charge was made after a volcanic artillery preparation of two hours had battered the defending line Hood s army charged without any preparation Pickett s charge was across an open space of perhaps a mile The advance at Franklin was for two miles in the open in full view of the enemy s works and exposed to their fire The defenders at Gettysburg were protected only by a stone wall Schofield s men at Franklin had carefully constructed works with trench and parapet Pickett s charge was totally repulsed The charge of Brown and Cleburne penetrated deep into the breastworks to part of which they clung until the enemy retired Pickett once repelled retired from the field The Army of Tennessee renewed their charge time after time Pickett survived his charge unscathed Cleburne was killed and eleven other general officers were killed wounded or captured Pickett s charge at Gettysburg has come to be a synonym for unflinching courage in the raw The slaughter pen at Franklin even more deserves the gory honor Stanley F Horn The Army of Tennessee 54 note 11 Following the failure of Johnson s assault Hood decided to end offensive actions for the evening and began to plan for a resumed series of attacks in the morning Schofield ordered his infantry to cross the river starting at 23 00 despite objections from Cox that withdrawal was no longer necessary and that Hood was weakened and should be counter attacked Schofield had received orders from Thomas to evacuate earlier that day before Hood s attack began and he was happy to take advantage of them despite the changed circumstances Although there was a period in which the Union army was vulnerable outside its works and straddling the river Hood did not attempt to take advantage of it during the night The Union army began entering the breastworks at Nashville at noon on December 1 with Hood s damaged army in pursuit 55 The damaged Confederate force was left in control of Franklin but its enemy had escaped again Although he had briefly come close to breaking through in the vicinity of the Columbia Turnpike Hood was unable to destroy Schofield or prevent his withdrawal to link up with Thomas in Nashville And his unsuccessful result came with a frightful cost The Union commanding general claimed that the Confederates suffered 6 252 casualties including 1 750 killed and 3 800 wounded but this is not corroborated by Confederate reports An estimated 2 000 others suffered less serious wounds and returned to duty before the Battle of Nashville More importantly the military leadership in the West was decimated including the loss of perhaps the best division commander of either side Patrick Cleburne who was killed in action Fourteen Confederate generals six killed seven wounded and one captured and 55 regimental commanders were casualties Five generals killed in action at Franklin were Cleburne John Adams Hiram B Granbury States Rights Gist and Otho F Strahl A sixth general John C Carter was mortally wounded and died later on December 10 The wounded generals were John C Brown Francis M Cockrell Zachariah C Deas Arthur M Manigault Thomas M Scott and Jacob H Sharp One general BGEN George W Gordon was captured 56 note 12 Also among the dead was Tod Carter the middle child of the Carter family Having enlisted in the Confederate army three years earlier Carter had returned to his hometown for the first time since then only to be wounded in battle just a few hundred yards away from his own house He was found by his family after the battle and died early in the next day 57 Historian Andrew Bledsoe writes that the wastage of the officer corps irreparably harmed Hood s army s morale disrupted its command structure and deprived it of talented and experienced commanders 58 He further cites the timing of the attack just before twilight as a key factor combined with the fact that most officers were mounted to preserve their command and control in the fading light a result of logical and terrible deliberation 59 Union losses were reported as only 189 killed 1 033 wounded and 1 104 missing It is possible that the number of casualties was under reported by Schofield because of the confusion during his army s hasty nighttime evacuation of Franklin note 13 The Union wounded were left behind in Franklin Many of the prisoners including all captured wounded and medical personnel were recovered on December 18 when Union forces re entered Franklin in pursuit of Hood The Army of Tennessee was badly damaged at Franklin Nevertheless rather than retreat and risk the army dissolving through desertions Hood advanced his 26 500 man force against the Union army now combined under Thomas firmly entrenched at Nashville which numbered more than 60 000 Hood and his department commander Gen P G T Beauregard requested reinforcements but none were available Strongly outnumbered and exposed to the elements Hood was attacked by Thomas on December 15 16 at the Battle of Nashville 60 defeated decisively and pursued aggressively retreating to Mississippi with just under 20 000 men The Army of Tennessee never fought again as an effective force and Hood s career was ruined 61 Perhaps surprisingly some Confederate soldiers claimed that Franklin was a victory James Lanning of the 25th Alabama Infantry wrote in his diary victory is ours but very dearly bought Confederate artilleryman William Ritter believed the charge was a brilliant one and was successful as part of the enemy s line was captured Joseph Boyce of the 1st Missouri Infantry acknowledged that many men considered Franklin a victory for the Confederate army since it held the battlefield at the end of the fighting However Boyce who was wounded at Franklin also noted two such victories will wipe out any army 62 Hood s continued pursuit of Schofield after suffering defeat at Franklin and his refusal to withdraw before the battle of Nashville caused Schofield to remark I doubt if any soldiers in the world ever needed more cumulative evidence to convince them that they were beaten 57 In his Pulitzer Prize winning book Battle Cry of Freedom James M McPherson wrote Having proved even to Hood s satisfaction that they could assault breastworks the Army of Tennessee had shattered itself beyond the possibility of ever doing so again 63 David J Eicher wrote that Hood had in effect mortally wounded his army at Franklin 1 Battlefield today edit This section needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources Battle of Franklin news newspapers books scholar JSTOR November 2017 Learn how and when to remove this template message Main article Franklin Battlefield nbsp Preserved areas of the Franklin battlefield around the Union defensive line nbsp 2010 Civil War reenactment Carter HouseThe Carter House which stands today and is open to visitors was located at the center of the Union position The site covers about 15 acres 61 000 m2 The house and outbuildings still show hundreds of bullet holes The Carnton Plantation home to the McGavock family during the battle also still stands and is likewise open to the public The Carnton Plantation home was one of 44 Franklin homes serving as a hospital often with 30 wounded in each small room of the house Confederate soldiers of Stewart s Corps swept past Carnton toward the left wing of the Union army and the house and outbuildings were converted into the largest field hospital present after the battle Adjacent to Carnton is the McGavock Confederate Cemetery where 1 481 Southern soldiers killed in the battle are buried Adjacent to the 48 acres 19 ha surrounding Carnton is another 110 acres 45 ha of battlefield formerly the Franklin Country Club golf course which is currently being converted to a city park 64 Much of the rest of the Franklin battlefield has been lost to commercial development The spot where Gen Cleburne fell for instance was covered until late 2005 by a Pizza Hut restaurant City officials and historic preservation groups have recently placed a new emphasis on saving what remains of the land over which the battle raged In 2006 0 5 acres 0 20 ha of land bordering the southwestern end of the Carter House property was acquired with help of the American Battlefield Trust and local organizations This land was part of 2 acres 0 81 ha that made up the Carter Family Garden which during the battle saw tremendous fighting and was part of a brief Confederate breakthrough After the purchase a house out buildings and a swimming pool were removed During excavation of the original Federal entrenchments some human bones were found Starting in 2005 the area around the intersection of Columbia Ave and Cleburne St has seen a serious renewed effort to reclaim that area to be the heart of a future battlefield park The location of the former Pizza Hut is now the home to Cleburne Park The property where the Carter Cotton Gin was located during the battle was purchased in 2005 In 2008 the property behind this location and where the Federal line crossed Columbia Ave was purchased and in May 2010 the property east of the Gin location and where part of the Gin may have stood was also purchased All these locations have houses on them that will be either sold and moved or torn down Preservation organizations plan to reconstruct both the Carter Cotton Gin and some of the Federal entrenchments 65 On November 24 2010 the State of Tennessee awarded a 960 000 enhancement grant from the Tennessee Department of Transportation to help purchase the property where the Domino s Pizza and mini mart is located A local preservation organization is also hoping to purchase 16 acres of land in two parcels five acres located southwest of what is now a small park called the Collin s Farm located at the southeast corner of the Lewisburg Pike and the Nashville and Decatur Railroad that was preserved a few years ago and 11 acres located near the corner of Lewisburg Pike and Carnton Lane 66 The American Battlefield Trust and its federal state and local partners have acquired and preserved more than 180 acres 0 73 km2 of the battlefield in more than a dozen different transactions since 1996 67 Hugh A Garland Jr the son of slavery advocate and Andrew Jackson supporter Hugh A Garland was a Confederate casualty in the battle In popular culture editIn the book Gone with the Wind by Margaret Mitchell the character Rhett Butler mentions that he fought at Franklin See also edit nbsp American Civil War portalArmies in the American Civil War Franklin Nashville campaign List of costliest American Civil War land battles Sherman s March Troop engagements of the American Civil War 1864References editFootnotes Our loss in killed wounded and prisoners was 4 500 During the month of November Killed 1089 wounded 3131 total 4220 These casualties include the bloody battle of Franklin Tenn fought November 30 1864 Per Cox It is necessary to keep this phase of the situation very clearly in mind for Schofield s critics have made the delibcratencss of his retreat a favorite point for attack overlooking the pressure upon him to make it still more so and the indisputable fact that had he hastened his movement by a single day Thomas s concentration would have been balked by Hood s intercepting the railway trains that were bringing Steedman s two divisions from Chattanooga to Nashville 13 Wagner s division was a mix of veterans and green troops who had been recruited six to eight weeks beforehnd Following the cues of their veteran colleagues they were well aware of the vulnerability of their position south of the main line 21 A few days after his ill considered position was overrun in the Confederate advance Wagner was relieved of command at his own request Jacobson has termed his decision to stand there reckless discretion 24 The Lost Cause myth has ushed the narrative that Cleburne was resigned to his fate but recently discovered papers show that according to a lot opf his peers Cleburne felt that he and Cheatham were responsible for the failure at Spring Hill and that Cleburne was aiming to redeem himself and his division 26 For examples of the popular view promoting Hood s anger and resentment see Sword McPherson amp Gottlieb and Nevin 30 Although Schofield was the commander of the Army of the Ohio through 1865 historians of the campaign do not always use this designation for the combination of corps assembled against Hood referring in some cases only to the Federal Army 34 At the start of the Atlanta Campaign Hood was appointed a temporary full general but this appointment was never confirmed by the Confederate Congress and was later rescinded The 175th Ohio was a green regiment that had only been formed in October 1864 43 Horn understates the losses of Pickett s Charge Pickett s division alone suffered 2 655 casualties 498 killed 643 wounded 833 wounded and captured and 681 captured unwounded and total Confederate losses during the three division attack were 6 555 Thus total casualties were somewhat comparable although the loss in senior officers at Franklin was far worse more so than Horn s 1941 description states Jacobson presents a full list of all of the officers who were casualties during the battle Current unpublished research by Carter House historian David Fraley has identified Union killed at Franklin to be in excess of 600 and perhaps as many as 800 However this list may include men who had fought at Franklin and died in captivity or in the Sultana explosion in April 1865 Citations a b c d e Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 774 U S War Dept Official Records Vol 45 1 p 654 Reports of General John B Hood C S Army commanding Army of Tennessee February 15 1865 pp 652 662 Foard 1892 p 133 Connelly 2001 pp 477 478 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 pp 736 737 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 29 30 McPherson 1988 pp 808 Sword 1993 pp 45 46 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 p 41 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 p 179 Welcher 1989 p 583 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 p 180 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 Nevin 1986 p 82 Sword 1993 pp 68 72 73 McPherson 1988 p 811 BoFT The Battle of Franklin McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 p 180 Sword 1993 pp 68 70 74 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 770 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 pp 181 182 Nevin 1986 p 88 Sword 1993 pp 93 95 Welcher 1989 p 588 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 770 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 53 55 72 75 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 pp 180 182 Nevin 1986 pp 82 83 88 Sword 1993 pp 84 89 91 Welcher 1989 pp 586 588 Cox 1897 p 22 Cox 1897 pp 22 23 McDonough amp Connelly 1983 p 10 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 771 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 105 168 Kennedy 1998 p 392 Sword 1993 pp 124 154 Welcher 1989 pp 588 590 Steplyk 2016 p 83 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 772 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 199 203 Sword 1993 pp 159 160 Welcher 1989 pp 590 591 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 p 198 Sword 1993 p 167 Welcher 1989 pp 591 593 a b Steplyk 2016 p 85 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 772 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 208 212 Sword 1993 p 167 Welcher 1989 p 593 a b Steplyk 2016 p 86 a b c BOFT Franklin Myths Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 219 21 228 230 Sword 1993 pp 170 171 Welcher 1989 p 594 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 p 230 Steplyk 2016 p 86 Sword 1993 pp 197 98 Welcher 1989 pp 593 597 Hood amp Hood 2015 p 238 Hood 2013 p 35 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 241 42 247 Nevin 1986 pp 98 100 Sword 1993 pp 178 180 White 2019 p 1 Hood 1996 p 291 a b Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 239 240 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 pp 188 189 Nevin 1986 pp 95 96 Sword 1993 p 179 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 p 239 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 243 247 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 p 189 Sword 1993 p 180 Welcher 1989 p 595 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 pp 770 774 Sword 1993 pp 448 451 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 452 Welcher 1989 pp 599 611 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 769 Sword 1993 pp 444 47 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 259 260 273 274 278 282 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 pp 189 191 Nevin 1986 p 103 Sword 1993 pp 189 196 ABT 10 Facts The Battle of Franklin NPS Battle Summary Franklin ABT Franklin The Valley of Death Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 259 260 273 274 278 282 McPherson amp Gottlieb 1989 p 191 Nevin 1986 p 105 Sword 1993 pp 194 196 Welcher 1989 p 595 Foote 1974 p 673 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 319 328 Nevin 1986 p 112 Sword 1993 pp 199 206 Welcher 1989 p 595 ABT Baptism of Fire An Interview with Eric Jacobson Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 3328 29 322 Nevin 1986 p 112 Welcher 1989 pp 595 596 a b c Steplyk 2016 p 92 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 323 308 315 310 286 Nevin 1986 pp 114 115 Sword 1993 pp 221 224 Welcher 1989 p 596 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 286 287 329 330 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 244 262 285 Sword 1993 p 292 Welcher 1989 pp 596 597 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 299 305 339 343 Nevin 1986 pp 114 115 Sword 1993 pp 216 218 226 227 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 292 293 Sword 1993 pp 218 219 Welcher 1989 p 597 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 356 358 Sword 1993 pp 238 242 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 377 385 Sword 1993 pp 245 247 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 358 363 Sword 1993 p 241 Welcher 1989 p 598 Horn 1941 pp 402 403 Nevin 1986 pp 117 118 Jacobson amp Rupp 2007 pp 418 420 a b CW Ten Facts About the Battle of Franklin Bledsoe 2016 p 67 Bledsoe 2016 p 68 69 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 776 Esposito 1959 p 153 Kennedy 1998 p 397 Sword 1993 p 312 Welcher 1989 p 602 Eicher McPherson amp McPherson 2001 p 775 780 Thrasher2021 p 188 McPherson 1988 p 813 NPS CWSAC report update Brentwood Carter Cotton Gin Tennessean Small strip mall Domino s Pizza ABT Franklin Battlefield Bibliography Bledsoe Andrew S 2016 The Destruction of the Army of Tennessee s Officer Corps at the Battle of Franklin In Woodworth Steven E Grear Charles D eds The Tennessee Campaign of 1864 PDF Civil War Campaigns in the Heartland 1st ed Carbondale IL Southern Illinois University Press pp 66 80 ISBN 978 0 8093 3453 7 OCLC 934434159 Connelly Thomas Lawrence 2001 Autumn of Glory The Army of Tennessee 1862 1865 Baton Rouge LA Louisiana State University Press ISBN 978 0 8071 2738 4 OCLC 47948904 Eicher David J McPherson James M McPherson James Alan 2001 The Longest Night A Military History of the Civil War PDF 1st ed New York NY Simon amp Schuster p 990 ISBN 978 0 7432 1846 7 LCCN 2001034153 OCLC 231931020 Retrieved July 6 2020 Esposito Vincent J 1959 West Point Atlas of American Wars New York NY Frederick A Praeger Publishers ISBN 978 0 8050 3391 5 OCLC 60298522 Retrieved July 6 2020 Foard A J 1892 Report of Surgeon A J Foard Medical Director Army of Tennessee Minutes of the Third Annual Meeting and Reunion Richmond VA United Confederate Veterans 3 133 Hood Stephen M 2013 John Bell Hood The Rise Fall and Resurrection of a Confederate General El Dorado Hills CA Savas Beatie p 335 ISBN 978 1 61121 140 5 OCLC 818954790 Hood John Bell Hood Stephen M 2015 The Lost Papers of Confederate General John Bell Hood El Dorado Hills CA Savas Beatie p 284 ISBN 978 1 61121 182 5 OCLC 865494675 Horn Stanley F 1941 The Army of Tennessee A Military History Indianapolis Bobbs Merrill Company p 489 OCLC 1065174533 Jacobson Eric A Rupp Richard A 2007 For Cause amp for Country A Study of the Affair at Spring Hill amp the Battle of Franklin Franklin TN O More Publishing ISBN 978 0 9717444 4 8 OCLC 428436180 Kennedy Frances H ed 1998 The Civil War Battlefield Guide Kindle 2nd ed Boston MA Houghton Mifflin Co ISBN 0 395 74012 6 Retrieved June 24 2020 McPherson James M Gottlieb Richard 1989 Battle Chronicles of the Civil war Vol 4 New York NY Macmillan Publishing Company Collier Macmillan Publishers ISBN 978 0 02 920661 4 OCLC 1164541109 McPherson James M 1988 Battle Cry of Freedom The Civil War Era PDF Oxford History of the United States 1st ed Oxford UK Oxford University Press p 904 ISBN 978 0 19 503863 7 OCLC 7577667 Nevin David 1986 Sherman s March Atlanta To The Sea Alexandria VA Silver Burdett ISBN 9780809448128 OCLC 1003113620 Sword Wiley 1993 The Confederacy s Last Hurrah Spring Hill Franklin and Nashville Lawrence KS University Press of Kansas ISBN 9780700606504 OCLC 1285470936 Steplyk Jonathan M 2016 Killing at Franklin Anatomy of Slaughter In Woodworth Steven E Grear Charles D eds The Tennessee Campaign of 1864 PDF Civil War Campaigns in the Heartland 1st ed Carbondale IL Southern Illinois University Press pp 81 104 ISBN 978 0 8093 3453 7 OCLC 934434159 Thrasher C D 2021 Suffering in the Army of Tennessee A Social History of the Confederate Army of the Heartland from the Battles for Atlanta to the Retreat from Nashville Voices of the Civil War series Knoxville TN University of Tennessee Press ISBN 978 1 62190 641 4 Retrieved May 26 2023 Welcher Frank Johnson 1989 The Western Theater The Union Army 1861 1865 Organization and Operations Vol 2 Bloomington Indiana University Press ISBN 978 0 253 36454 8 OCLC 1089613807 White William Lee 2019 Let Us Die Like Men The Battle of Franklin November 30 1864 El Dorado Hills CA Savas Beatie LLC ISBN 978 1 61121 296 9 OCLC 1004981755 Franklin Battlefield American Battlefield Trust Retrieved May 17 2023 10 Facts The Battle of Franklin www battlefields org American Battlefield Trust October 8 2022 Retrieved May 28 2023 Book Baptism of Fire An Interview with Eric Jacobson www battlefields org American Battlefield Trust October 8 2022 Retrieved May 28 2023 Cartwright Thomas Y October 8 2022 Franklin The Valley of Death www battlefields org American Battlefield Trust Retrieved May 28 2023 Franklin nps gov U S National Park Service January 19 2004 Archived from the original on October 6 2014 Retrieved September 14 2017 CWSAC report update PDF nps gov U S National Park Service January 15 2003 Retrieved September 14 2017 Ten Facts About the Battle of Franklin civilwar org Archived from the original on November 4 2016 Retrieved November 3 2016 Carter Cotton Gin foundation unearthed during excavation Brentwood Homepage May 14 2015 Retrieved November 3 2016 Small Strip Mall Domino s Pizza to give way to new battlefield park tennessean com Tennessean November 30 2010 Retrieved November 3 2016 The Battle of Franklin The Battle of Franklin Trust July 18 2022 Retrieved May 31 2023 Jacobson Eric A May 4 2023 Chalkboard History Franklin Myths YouTube Franklin TN The Battle of Franklin Trust Event occurs at 23 40 Retrieved May 31 2023 Memoirs and primary sources dd Cox Jacob D 1897 The Battle of Franklin Tennessee November 30 1864 a monograph New York C Scribner s Sons LCCN 03026860 OCLC 559888956 Hood John Bell 1996 Advance and retreat personal experiences in the United States and Confederate States armies Lincoln NE University of Nebraska Press ISBN 978 0 585 26794 4 OCLC 45727510 First published 1880 for the Hood Orphan Memorial Fund by G T Beauregard U S War Department 1889 Operations in Kentucky Southwest Virginia Tennessee Mississippi Alabama and North Georgia November 14 1864 January 22 1865 Part I Reports Union and Confederate Correspondence etc The War of the Rebellion A Compilation of the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies Vol XLV LVII I Washington DC U S Government Printing Office pp 53 55 663 hdl 2027 coo 31924077743031 OCLC 857196196 nbsp This article incorporates text from this source which is in the public domain Further reading Foote Shelby 1974 The Civil War Volume III Red River to Appomattox Random House 2011 ed New York NY Random House pp 1 120 ISBN 978 1 4090 7858 6 OCLC 1004975561 McDonough James L Connelly Thomas Lawrence 1983 Five Tragic Hours The Battle of Franklin Knoxville TN University of Tennessee Press p 217 ISBN 978 0 87049 396 6 OCLC 10891021 Letter Alonzo Wolverton to his sister Roseltha olverton Goble December 4 1864 Wolverton Family Letters Archives of Ontario Retrieved September 8 2018 External links edit nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to Battle of Franklin Battle of Franklin Battle Maps histories photos and preservation news Civil War Trust Animated map of the Battle of Franklin Civil War Trust A blog database for descendants of the Battle of Franklin Google Map of the Battle of Franklin Archived January 8 2021 at the Wayback Machine Battle of Franklin net Animated history of the Franklin Nashville Campaign Archived July 8 2011 at the Wayback Machine Save the Franklin Battlefield Inc Carter House Museum Carnton Plantation McGavock Confederate Cemetery West Point Atlas map Battles of Spring Hill and Franklin Historic map of Franklin Tennessee Civil War Preservation Association John Bell Hood Society s defense of Hood s 1864 Tennessee campaign On this date in Civil War history Battle of Franklin November 30 1864 Portal nbsp United States Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Battle of Franklin amp oldid 1205150433, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.