1934 German referendum

A referendum on merging the posts of Chancellor and President was held in Nazi Germany on 19 August 1934,^[1] seventeen days after the death of President Paul von Hindenburg. The German leadership sought to gain approval for Adolf Hitler's assumption of supreme power. The referendum was associated with widespread intimidation of voters, and Hitler used the resultant large "yes" vote to claim public support to succeed Hindenburg as the de facto head of state of Germany. In fact, he had assumed presidential powers immediately upon Hindenburg's death and used the referendum to legitimise that move and take the title Führer und Reichskanzler (Führer and Reich Chancellor).

1934 German referendum

19 August 1934
The office of the President of the Reich is unified with the office of the Chancellor. Consequently all former powers of the President of the Reich are transmitted to the Führer and Chancellor of the Reich Adolf Hitler. He himself nominates his substitute. Do you, German man and German woman, approve of this regulation provided by this law?
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 38,394,848 89.93% No 4,300,370 10.07% Valid votes 42,695,218 97.99% Invalid or blank votes 873,668 2.01% Total votes 43,568,886 100.00% Registered voters/turnout 45,552,059 95.65%

Banner with the campaign message "Yes to the Führer!" on a school building in Fürth

Background

Hitler had known as early as April 1934 that Hindenburg would likely be dead by the end of the year. He spent much of the runup working to get the armed forces to support him as Hindenburg's successor.^[2] That summer, in the wake of escalating Nazi excesses, Hindenburg threatened to sack Hitler and declare martial law unless Hitler took immediate steps to end the tension.^[3] This episode reminded Hitler that Hindenburg's power to dismiss him was the only check on his power. With the passage of the Enabling Act and the banning of all parties other than the Nazis a year earlier, there was no other remedy by which Hitler could be legally removed from office.^[4] Hitler responded by ordering the Night of the Long Knives, in which several SA leaders, most notably Ernst Röhm, were murdered along with several of Hitler's other past rivals.^[5]

On 1 August, with Hindenburg's death imminent, Hitler had the cabinet pass the Law Concerning the Head of State of the German Reich. It stipulated that upon Hindenburg's death, the offices of president (head of state) and chancellor (head of government) would be merged under the title of Leader and Chancellor (Führer und Reichskanzler).^{[6][page needed]} Hindenburg died the following day, and two hours later, Hitler issued a decree announcing that in accordance with the new law, he had assumed the president's powers.^[7] He publicly argued that the presidency had become so linked with Hindenburg that the title should not be used again.^[8]

Immediately after Hindenburg's death on 2 August, defence minister and commander-in-chief Werner von Blomberg ordered all members of the Reichswehr (armed forces) to take an oath to Hitler.^[9]

When Hindenburg dictated his testament in May, he included as his "last wish" for Hitler to restore the Hohenzollern monarchy. His son, Oskar von Hindenburg, passed the testament on to Vice Chancellor Franz von Papen, who, in turn, gave it to Hitler on 14 August. The next day, 15 August, Hitler had it published without any indication of Hindenburg's "last wish".^[9]

Conduct

 

The Law on the Head of State of the German Reich of August 1

Voters were asked the question:

The office of the President of the Reich is unified with the office of the Chancellor. Consequently all former powers of the President of the Reich are transmitted to the Führer and Chancellor of the Reich Adolf Hitler. He himself nominates his substitute.

Do you, German man and German woman, approve of this regulation provided by this Law?^[10]

The government used widespread intimidation and electoral fraud to secure a large "yes" vote. This included stationing storm troopers at polling stations and forcibly escorting clubs and societies to polling stations. In some places, polling booths were removed, or banners reading "only traitors enter here" hung over the entrances to discourage secret voting. In addition, many ballot papers were pre-marked with "yes" votes, spoiled ballot papers were frequently counted as having been "yes" votes and many "no" votes were recorded to have been in favour of the referendum question. The extent of the fraud meant that in some areas, the number of votes recorded to have been cast was greater than the number of people able to vote.^[11]

However, the Nazis also made little effort to prevent either the casting or tabulation of negative or invalid votes in districts that were known to have large populations of Jews, Poles and other ethnic minorities. As was the case in the November 1933 elections, the first held after the Nazis seized full power, the leadership considered the expected unfavourable results in such areas to be useful in their propaganda as proof of disloyalty to the Reich.

The relative lack of support in Hamburg in 1933 prompted Hitler to declare a national holiday on 17 August 1934 so that he could address the German people directly over the 4.3 million registered radio sets.^[12]

The referendum itself, as well as all efforts to make Hitler head of state, violated the Enabling Act. Although it gave Hitler the right to pass laws that were contrary to the constitution, it stated that the president's powers were to remain "undisturbed", which has long been interpreted to forbid any attempt to tamper with the presidency. The constitution had also previously been amended in 1932 to make the president of the High Court of Justice (Erwin Bumke by 1934), not the chancellor, first in the line of succession to the presidency and even then only on an interim basis until fresh elections.^[13]

Results

Officially, "yes" easily won with slightly less than 90% of the vote.^[14] Support for merging the offices of president and chancellor was greatest in East Prussia, where official figures show that 96% voted in favour.^[15] Support was lowest in urban districts. It was least strong in Hamburg, where just under 80% voted affirmatively (20.4% against).^[16] In Berlin, 18.5% of votes were negative and every district reported a negative vote share greater than 10%. In the former Communist stronghold of Wedding, just under 20% voted against.^[17] Overall support for the government was lower than in the referendum of 12 November 1933, when the government had received support from 95.1% of the total electorate.^[18]

Some in the Nazi leadership were disappointed by the results of the referendum.^[19] For instance, Joseph Goebbels' diary entry for 22 August speaks of the referendum as a failure: "Initial results: very bad. Then better. Finally over 38 million for the Führer. I expected more. The Catholics failed Rosenberg!"^[20] Nevertheless, historian Ian Kershaw has judged that even after accounting for the manipulation of the voting process, the results "reflected the fact that Hitler had the backing, much of it fervently enthusiastic, of the great majority of the German people" at the time.^[19]

Choice		Votes	%
For		38,394,848	89.93
Against		4,300,370	10.07
Total		42,695,218	100.00
Valid votes		42,695,218	97.99
Invalid/blank votes		873,668	2.01
Total votes		43,568,886	100.00
Registered voters/turnout		45,552,059	95.65
Source: Nohlen & Stöver^[21]

References

Footnotes

1. Nohlen & Stöver 2010, p. 762.
2. Shirer 1960, pp. 214–215.
3. Evans 2005, p. 30.
4. Shirer 1960, p. 219.
5. Evans 2005, pp. 30, 35–36.
6. Overy 2004.
7. Shirer 1960, p. 226.
8. Evans 2005, p. 42.
9. Winkler 2006, pp. 38–39.
10. Shu 2014, p. 4.
11. Evans 2005, p. 110.
12. Zurcher 1935, p. 94.
13. Shirer 1960, p. 229.
14. Urban 2011, p. 43.
15. Zurcher 1935, p. 96.
16. Reichsanzeiger 1934, p. 1.
17. Birchall 1934, p. 5.
18. Urban 2011, p. 42–43.
19. Kershaw 1998, p. 526.
20. Urban 2011, p. 43 (footnote 4).
21. Nohlen & Stöver 2010, p. 770.

Sources

• Birchall, Frederick T. (20 August 1934). "Hitler endorsed by 9 to 1 in poll on his dictatorship, but opposition is doubled; absolute power is won". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
• "Deutsche Reichsanzeiger und Preußische Staatsanzeiger" (in German). Berlin. 6 September 1934. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
• Evans, Richard J. (May 2005). Winder, Simon; Moyers, Scott (eds.). The Third Reich in Power. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-1-59420-074-8.
• Kershaw, Ian (1998). Hitler, 1889–1936: Hubris. London: Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-013363-9.
• Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip (31 December 2010). Elections in Europe: a data handbook (1st ed.). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. ISBN 978-3-8329-5609-7. OCLC 617565273.
• Overy, Richard (2004). The Dictators: Hitler's Germany, Stalin's Russia. London: W. W. Norton. ISBN 0393020304.
• Shirer, William (1960). The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-831-77404-2.
• Shu, Min (27 May 2014). (PDF). Waseda University. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 February 2017. Retrieved 7 October 2023.
• Urban, Markus (2011). "The Self-Staging of a Plebiscitary Dictatorship: The NS-Regime Between 'Uniformed Reichstag', Referendum and Reichsparteitag". In Jessen, Ralph; Richter, Hedwig (eds.). Voting for Hitler and Stalin: Elections Under 20th Century Dictatorships. New York: Campus Verlag. ISBN 978-3-593-39489-3. OCLC 1330862582.
• Winkler, Heinrich August (2006). Germany: The Long Road West, Volume II (1933–1990). Oxford University Press.
• Zurcher, Arnold J. (1935). "The Hitler Referenda". American Political Science Review. 29 (1). doi:10.2307/1947171. JSTOR 1947171. S2CID 146390292.