Dethronement of Sigismund III act issued by rokosz June 24, 1607 near Warsaw
The rebellion was sparked by several grievances, including the King's attempts to reduce the power of the magnates and increase the power of the royal court. The rebellion was supported by both Protestant and Catholic magnates; although religious tensions were a factor, the rebels' grievances were broader and reflected more general concerns about the country's direction. The rebels initially achieved some successes with unconventional tactics but were ultimately defeated in a series of battles in early 1607, which had significant repercussions for the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth by further weakening an already unstable political system and contributing to a decline in the King's power and prestige.[1]
The Polish nobles who gathered at the rokosz formed a konfederacja and outlined their demands in 67 articles. They demanded Sigismund III's dethronement for breaching the Henrician Articles and the expulsion of the Jesuits from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. They further demanded for the Sejm (Parliament) to appoint state officials, instead of the King; for local officials to be elected, not appointed, and for Protestants' rights to be expanded and protected.
The 1607 Sejm rejected those demands. Meanwhile, the rebel nobles gathered in Guzów. In 1607, the Royal Army, led by HetmanJan Karol Chodkiewicz, was sent to pacify the rebels. A full-scale battle ensued on July 5 or 6 (sources vary), with 200 casualties, which resulted in the victory of the royal forces.
17th century depiction of the rebellion.
By 1609, the rebellion was over. Two years after the start of the revolt, the rebellious nobles formally surrendered to the king at the 1609 meeting of the Sejm, which became known as the Pacification Sejm. In return, the rebels were granted leniency. Many royal supporters, including Hetman Chodkiewicz, had successfully argued for amnesty for the rebels.
Despite the failure of the rebellion, it ruined any chance that Sigismund III had to strengthen his role in the government. The Polish historian Oskar Halecki wrote:
"The first rebellion in Polish history had sinister consequences. Royalty lost, to great extent, the moral prestige it had enjoyed.... The Polish constitution was henceforth regarded as sacrosanct and the king had to renounce not only the idea of making any far-reaching changes in it, but even any reform."[2]
After the rebellion, King Sigismund attempted to funnel the nobles' restless energy into external wars. That was one factor that led to the official Commonwealth involvement in the Polish-Muscovite War (1609–18), which followed the Dimitriads (1605–09).
^"Zebrzydowski Rebellion | Polish history | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2023-03-09.
^Oskar Halecki, Antony Polonsky, A history of Poland, Routledge, 1978, ISBN0-7100-8647-4, Google Print, p.144
Further readingEdit
Kate Wilson, The jewel of liberty stolen?: The Rokosz of Sandomierz and Polish Dissent, paper at Graduate Conference in Central European Studies, The Contours of Legitimacy in Central Europe, Oxford, PDF
October 21, 2023
zebrzydowski, rebellion, zebrzydowski, rebellion, polish, rokosz, zebrzydowskiego, sandomierz, rebellion, polish, rokosz, sandomierski, rokosz, semi, legal, rebellion, polish, lithuanian, commonwealth, against, king, sigismund, vasa, rokosz, formed, august, 16. Zebrzydowski s rebellion Polish rokosz Zebrzydowskiego or the Sandomierz rebellion Polish rokosz sandomierski was a rokosz semi legal rebellion in the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth against King Sigismund III Vasa The rokosz formed on 5 August 1606 by Mikolaj Zebrzydowski Jan Szczesny Herburt Stanislaw Stadnicki Aleksander Jozef Lisowski and Janusz Radziwill in Stezyca and Lublin was caused by the growing dissatisfaction with the King among the szlachta Polish nobility In particular the rebels disapproved of the King s efforts to limit the power of the nobles his attempts to weaken the Sejm Polish Parliament and to introduce a hereditary monarchy in place of the elective one The rebellion 1606 1609 ended in the defeat of the rebels but the szlachta in return for their surrender now controlled the monarchy in the Polish Lithuanian political system Dethronement of Sigismund III act issued by rokosz June 24 1607 near WarsawThe rebellion was sparked by several grievances including the King s attempts to reduce the power of the magnates and increase the power of the royal court The rebellion was supported by both Protestant and Catholic magnates although religious tensions were a factor the rebels grievances were broader and reflected more general concerns about the country s direction The rebels initially achieved some successes with unconventional tactics but were ultimately defeated in a series of battles in early 1607 which had significant repercussions for the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth by further weakening an already unstable political system and contributing to a decline in the King s power and prestige 1 Contents 1 History 2 See also 3 References 4 Further readingHistory EditThe Polish nobles who gathered at the rokosz formed a konfederacja and outlined their demands in 67 articles They demanded Sigismund III s dethronement for breaching the Henrician Articles and the expulsion of the Jesuits from the Polish Lithuanian Commonwealth They further demanded for the Sejm Parliament to appoint state officials instead of the King for local officials to be elected not appointed and for Protestants rights to be expanded and protected The 1607 Sejm rejected those demands Meanwhile the rebel nobles gathered in Guzow In 1607 the Royal Army led by Hetman Jan Karol Chodkiewicz was sent to pacify the rebels A full scale battle ensued on July 5 or 6 sources vary with 200 casualties which resulted in the victory of the royal forces nbsp 17th century depiction of the rebellion By 1609 the rebellion was over Two years after the start of the revolt the rebellious nobles formally surrendered to the king at the 1609 meeting of the Sejm which became known as the Pacification Sejm In return the rebels were granted leniency Many royal supporters including Hetman Chodkiewicz had successfully argued for amnesty for the rebels Despite the failure of the rebellion it ruined any chance that Sigismund III had to strengthen his role in the government The Polish historian Oskar Halecki wrote The first rebellion in Polish history had sinister consequences Royalty lost to great extent the moral prestige it had enjoyed The Polish constitution was henceforth regarded as sacrosanct and the king had to renounce not only the idea of making any far reaching changes in it but even any reform 2 After the rebellion King Sigismund attempted to funnel the nobles restless energy into external wars That was one factor that led to the official Commonwealth involvement in the Polish Muscovite War 1609 18 which followed the Dimitriads 1605 09 See also EditLubomirski s Rokosz Chicken War Nihil noviReferences Edit Zebrzydowski Rebellion Polish history Britannica www britannica com Retrieved 2023 03 09 Oskar Halecki Antony Polonsky A history of Poland Routledge 1978 ISBN 0 7100 8647 4 Google Print p 144Further reading EditKate Wilson The jewel of liberty stolen The Rokosz of Sandomierz and Polish Dissent paper at Graduate Conference in Central European Studies The Contours of Legitimacy in Central Europe Oxford PDF Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Zebrzydowski rebellion amp oldid 1153186920, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
