fbpx
Wikipedia

WikiProject

January 13, 2023

For Wikipedia's page on WikiProjects for editors, see WP:WikiProject.

A WikiProject, or Wikiproject, is a Wikimedia movement affinity group for contributors with shared goals. WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki, Wikipedia, and exist to varying degrees within sister projects such as Wiktionary, Wikiquote, Wikidata, and Wikisource. They also exist in different languages, and translation of articles is a form of their collaboration. During the COVID-19 pandemic, CBS News noted the role of Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine in maintaining the accuracy of articles related to the disease.[1] Another WikiProject that has drawn attention is WikiProject Women Scientists, which was profiled by Smithsonian for its efforts to improve coverage of women scientists which the profile noted had "helped increase the number of female scientists on Wikipedia from around 1,600 to over 5,000".[2]

On Wikipedia

Some Wikipedia WikiProjects are substantial enough to engage in cooperative activities with outside organizations relevant to the field at issue. For example, in 2014 Cochrane announced that it had entered into a partnership with Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine, "to support sharing relevant Cochrane Evidence in Wikipedia’s health articles and to develop strategies to keep Wikipedia’s health-related content up to date, unbiased, and of high quality."[3]

Wikipedia has thousands of WikiProjects, primarily divided between specific topical areas and performing specific maintenance tasks.[4][5] One task commonly performed by topical WikiProjects on Wikipedia is the assessment of the quality of articles that fall within that topic area.[6] In Wikipedia and sister projects, WikiProject pages are located in project space,[4] and the meta information regarding the association between the article and the WikiProject is usually included on the talk page of the article.[6] WikiProjects provide an additional avenue for engagement between editors with similar interests, and have thereby been found to increase the productivity of such editors.[7] In order to spur participation and concentrate effectiveness, WikiProjects on Wikipedia may engage in activities like having a "collaboration of the week",[8] or designating one article to be improved to the point of achieving "featured" status.[9] The WikiProject Council is a group of editors that assists with the development of active WikiProjects, and acts as a central point for inter-WikiProject discussion and collaboration.

A 2008 academic study of Wikipedia concluded that participation in WikiProjects substantially improved the chances of an editor becoming an administrator, finding that one Wikipedia policy edit or WikiProject edit is worth ten article edits,[10] and concluding:

Merely performing a lot of production work is insufficient for "promotion" in Wikipedia. Candidates’ article edits were weak predictors of success. They also have to demonstrate more managerial behavior. Diverse experience and contributions to the development of policies and WikiProjects were stronger predictors of RfA success. This is consistent with the findings that Wikipedia is a bureaucracy[11] and that coordination work has increased substantially.[12][13] [...] Participation in Wikipedia policy and WikiProjects was not predictive of adminship prior to 2006, suggesting the community as a whole is beginning to prioritize policymaking and organization experience over simple article-level coordination.

WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality

For related Wikipedia administration pages see Wikipedia:Content assessment.

The English Wikipedia currently has over 2,000 WikiProjects, with varying degrees of activity.[14][self-published source?][15][self-published source?]

In 2007, the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles.[16][self-published source?] Articles are rated by WikiProjects. The range of quality classes begins with "Stub" (very short pages), followed by "Start", "C" and "B" (in increasing order of quality). Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes: either "A", "good article" or the highest, "featured article". Of the about 4.4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015, about 7,000 (0.16%) are a featured article or a featured list. One featured article per day, as selected by editors, appears on the main page of Wikipedia.[17][18] According to research in 2021, WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has the most quality content in terms of good articles and featured articles. This is unusual, due to the project's narrow scope and member count of only around 100.[19]

The articles can also be rated for importance by WikiProjects. Currently,[when?] there are 5 importance categories: "low", "mid", "high", "top", and "???" for unclassified/unsure level. For a particular article, different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels.

The Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team has developed a table (shown below) that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance, on the English Wikipedia. If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects, then the highest rating is used in the table and bar-chart.

Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors.[20] A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles.[21]

All rated articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low ??? Total
  FA 1,491 2,334 2,292 1,706 172 7,995
  FL 166 618 699 650 106 2,239
  A 329 649 763 547 87 2,375
  GA 2,964 6,751 13,660 17,241 1,654 42,270
B 15,534 29,877 48,726 55,837 16,778 166,752
C 15,555 49,207 121,236 251,101 73,232 510,331
Start 18,729 89,925 395,328 1,413,538 383,728 2,301,248
Stub 4,277 31,907 279,165 2,625,369 819,513 3,760,231
List 4,538 15,932 49,640 170,811 72,040 312,961
Assessed 63,583 227,200 911,509 4,536,800 1,367,310 7,106,402
Unassessed 114 447 1,185 15,070 396,089 412,905
Total 63,697 227,647 912,694 4,551,870 1,763,399 7,519,307
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
Top
High
Medium
Low
???
  •   Featured articles
  •   Featured lists
  •   A-class articles
  •   Good articles
  •   B-class articles
  •   C-class articles
  •   Start-class articles
  •   Stub articles
  •   Lists
  •   Unassessed articles and lists
[Note: The table above (prepared by the Wikipedia Version 1.0 Editorial Team) is automatically updated daily by User:WP 1.0 bot, but the bar-chart is not auto-updated.]

WikiProject Medicine

WikiProject Medicine, formed in 2004, is a Wikipedia WikiProject dedicated to improving coverage of medicine-related topics.[22][23][24] It has over 200 active volunteers, including James Heilman. About half of the volunteers are health care professionals or students.[22][23] The project has established contacts with organizations such as World Health Organization, National Institutes of Health, United States National Library of Medicine, and Cancer Research UK, and succeeded in creating several Wikipedian in residence programs at medical institutions.[24]

A 2011 review of the project efforts praised it for assessing the vast majority of medical articles on Wikipedia (at that time about 25,000), at the same time remarking that only around 70 have been assessed as high quality. The reviewer also suggested improvements to the Wikipedia system, such as making article assessment more prominent to the readers, and requesting that reviewers leave notes on how to improve low quality articles.[22] In 2012, a dedicated American NGO, Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF), was formed to support it.[23][25][26][24] A 2016 review noted that the number of high quality articles has improved to about 80, noting that one of them (on dengue fever) was even formatted and republished in a peer reviewed journal. The review praised the efforts of the volunteers, but noted that participation levels are too low to promise any significant improvements in the thousands of lower-quality articles, calling for more medical practitioners to volunteer their time on Wikipedia. Regarding the quality of articles, the review also pointed that readability (complexity) of Wikipedia articles may be too high for its intended audience, and encouraged the Wikipedia volunteers to review this aspect.[24][27]

WikiProject Medicine during the COVID-19 pandemic

CBS News described the role of Wikipedia's WikiProject Medicine in making Wikipedia a source of medical information relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that a project member "edits and reviews all the medical content on Wikipedia", but also providing the caveat that "even though medical pages are strictly monitored by the WikiProject team, and hot topics that get a lot of page views are carefully edited, inaccurate information persists on some of Wikipedia's less-read pages".[1]

References

  1. ^ a b Laudato, Anthony (May 24, 2020). "The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information". CBS News.
  2. ^ Daley, Jason (March 15, 2016). "How a College Student Led the WikiProject Women Scientists". Smithsonian Magazine.
  3. ^ "Improving the quality of Wikipedia articles using Cochrane evidence". Cochrane. Retrieved November 19, 2019.
  4. ^ a b Phoebe Ayers, Charles Matthews, Ben Yates, How Wikipedia Works: And how You Can be a Part of it (2008), p. 213.
  5. ^ Broughton, John (2008). Wikipedia – The Missing Manual. O'Reilly Media. pp. 165–175.
  6. ^ a b Huijing Deng, Bernadetta Tarigan, Mihai Grigore, Juliana Sutanto, "Understanding the ‘Quality Motion’ of Wikipedia Articles Through Semantic Convergence Analysis", HCI in Business: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9191 (July 21, 2015), p. 64-75.
  7. ^ Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 207, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  8. ^ Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 38, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  9. ^ Robert E. Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Building Successful Online Communities (2012), p. 85, "WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain, like military history, sports, or medicine".
  10. ^ Burke, Moira; Kraut, Robert (2008). "Taking up the mop". Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08. p. 3441. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358871. ISBN 978-1-60558-012-8. S2CID 5868576.
  11. ^ Butler, Brian; Joyce, Elisabeth; Pike, Jacqueline (2008). "Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy". Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '08. p. 1101. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357227. ISBN 9781605580111. S2CID 15211227.
  12. ^ Kittur, Aniket; Suh, Bongwon; Pendleton, Bryan A.; and Chi, Ed H. (2007). "He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia". Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 453–462. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240698. ISBN 978-1-59593-593-9. S2CID 17493296.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ Viegas, Fernanda B.; Wattenberg, Martin; Kriss, Jesse; van Ham, Frank (2007). "Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia". 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences: 575–582. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.210.1057. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2007.511. ISBN 978-0-7695-2755-0. S2CID 5293547.
  14. ^ Wikipedia:Wikiprojects
  15. ^ Wikipedia:Database reports/WikiProjects by changes
  16. ^ Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment
  17. ^ Poderi, Giacomo (8 April 2009). "Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia". First Monday. doi:10.5210/fm.v14i5.2365. Retrieved July 13, 2010.
  18. ^ Fernanda B. Viégas; Martin Wattenberg & Matthew M. McKeon (July 22, 2007). "The Hidden Order of Wikipedia" (PDF). Visual Communication Lab, IBM Research. Retrieved October 30, 2007. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ^ Jemielniak, Dariusz; Rychwalska, Agnieszka; Talaga, Szymon; Ziembowicz, Karolina (September 2021). "Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones: The most successful crowd-sourced knowledge project with near real-time coverage of extreme weather phenomena". Weather and Climate Extremes. 33 – via ScienceDirect.
  20. ^ Poderi, Giacomo, Wikipedia and the Featured Articles: How a Technological System Can Produce Best Quality Articles, Master thesis, University of Maastricht, October 2008.
  21. ^ Lindsey, David (April 5, 2010). "Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia's featured articles". First Monday. 15 (4). Retrieved January 29, 2017.
  22. ^ a b c Trevena, L. (2011-06-08). "WikiProject Medicine". BMJ. 342 (jun08 3): d3387. doi:10.1136/bmj.d3387. ISSN 0959-8138. PMID 21653617. S2CID 206893220.
  23. ^ a b c James, Richard (October 2016). "WikiProject Medicine: Creating Credibility in Consumer Health". Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 16 (4): 344–351. doi:10.1080/15323269.2016.1221284. ISSN 1532-3269. S2CID 79020792.
  24. ^ a b c d Murray, Terry (2015-03-03). "WikiProject Medicine making progress". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 187 (4): 245. doi:10.1503/cmaj.109-4982. ISSN 0820-3946. PMC 4347770. PMID 25646285.
  25. ^ "Wiki Project Med - Meta". meta.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 2021-10-19.
  26. ^ Shafee, Thomas; Masukume, Gwinyai; Kipersztok, Lisa; Das, Diptanshu; Häggström, Mikael; Heilman, James (2017-11-01). "Evolution of Wikipedia's medical content: past, present and future". J Epidemiol Community Health. 71 (11): 1122–1129. doi:10.1136/jech-2016-208601. ISSN 0143-005X. PMC 5847101. PMID 28847845.
  27. ^ Heilman, James M; Wolff, Jacob De; Beards, Graham M; Basden, Brian J (2014-10-02). "Dengue fever: a Wikipedia clinical review". Open Medicine. 8 (4): e105–e115. ISSN 1911-2092. PMC 4242787. PMID 25426178.

External links

January 13, 2023
wikiproject, wikipedia, page, editors, wikiproject, wikimedia, movement, affinity, group, contributors, with, shared, goals, prevalent, within, largest, wiki, wikipedia, exist, varying, degrees, within, sister, projects, such, wiktionary, wikiquote, wikidata, . For Wikipedia s page on WikiProjects for editors see WP WikiProject A WikiProject or Wikiproject is a Wikimedia movement affinity group for contributors with shared goals WikiProjects are prevalent within the largest wiki Wikipedia and exist to varying degrees within sister projects such as Wiktionary Wikiquote Wikidata and Wikisource They also exist in different languages and translation of articles is a form of their collaboration During the COVID 19 pandemic CBS News noted the role of Wikipedia s WikiProject Medicine in maintaining the accuracy of articles related to the disease 1 Another WikiProject that has drawn attention is WikiProject Women Scientists which was profiled by Smithsonian for its efforts to improve coverage of women scientists which the profile noted had helped increase the number of female scientists on Wikipedia from around 1 600 to over 5 000 2 Contents 1 On Wikipedia 1 1 WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality 2 WikiProject Medicine 2 1 WikiProject Medicine during the COVID 19 pandemic 3 References 4 External linksOn Wikipedia EditSome Wikipedia WikiProjects are substantial enough to engage in cooperative activities with outside organizations relevant to the field at issue For example in 2014 Cochrane announced that it had entered into a partnership with Wikipedia s WikiProject Medicine to support sharing relevant Cochrane Evidence in Wikipedia s health articles and to develop strategies to keep Wikipedia s health related content up to date unbiased and of high quality 3 Wikipedia has thousands of WikiProjects primarily divided between specific topical areas and performing specific maintenance tasks 4 5 One task commonly performed by topical WikiProjects on Wikipedia is the assessment of the quality of articles that fall within that topic area 6 In Wikipedia and sister projects WikiProject pages are located in project space 4 and the meta information regarding the association between the article and the WikiProject is usually included on the talk page of the article 6 WikiProjects provide an additional avenue for engagement between editors with similar interests and have thereby been found to increase the productivity of such editors 7 In order to spur participation and concentrate effectiveness WikiProjects on Wikipedia may engage in activities like having a collaboration of the week 8 or designating one article to be improved to the point of achieving featured status 9 The WikiProject Council is a group of editors that assists with the development of active WikiProjects and acts as a central point for inter WikiProject discussion and collaboration A 2008 academic study of Wikipedia concluded that participation in WikiProjects substantially improved the chances of an editor becoming an administrator finding that one Wikipedia policy edit or WikiProject edit is worth ten article edits 10 and concluding Merely performing a lot of production work is insufficient for promotion in Wikipedia Candidates article edits were weak predictors of success They also have to demonstrate more managerial behavior Diverse experience and contributions to the development of policies and WikiProjects were stronger predictors of RfA success This is consistent with the findings that Wikipedia is a bureaucracy 11 and that coordination work has increased substantially 12 13 Participation in Wikipedia policy and WikiProjects was not predictive of adminship prior to 2006 suggesting the community as a whole is beginning to prioritize policymaking and organization experience over simple article level coordination WikiProjects and assessments of article importance and quality Edit For related Wikipedia administration pages see Wikipedia Content assessment The English Wikipedia currently has over 2 000 WikiProjects with varying degrees of activity 14 self published source 15 self published source In 2007 the English Wikipedia introduced an assessment scale of the quality of articles 16 self published source Articles are rated by WikiProjects The range of quality classes begins with Stub very short pages followed by Start C and B in increasing order of quality Community peer review is needed for the article to enter one of the highest quality classes either A good article or the highest featured article Of the about 4 4 million articles and lists assessed as of March 2015 about 7 000 0 16 are a featured article or a featured list One featured article per day as selected by editors appears on the main page of Wikipedia 17 18 According to research in 2021 WikiProject Tropical Cyclones has the most quality content in terms of good articles and featured articles This is unusual due to the project s narrow scope and member count of only around 100 19 The articles can also be rated for importance by WikiProjects Currently when there are 5 importance categories low mid high top and for unclassified unsure level For a particular article different WikiProjects may assign different importance levels The Wikipedia Version 1 0 Editorial Team has developed a table shown below that displays data of all rated articles by quality and importance on the English Wikipedia If an article or list receives different ratings by two or more WikiProjects then the highest rating is used in the table and bar chart Researcher Giacomo Poderi found that articles tend to reach featured status via the intensive work of a few editors 20 A 2010 study found unevenness in quality among featured articles and concluded that the community process is ineffective in assessing the quality of articles 21 All rated articles by quality and importanceQuality ImportanceTop High Mid Low Total FA 1 491 2 334 2 292 1 706 172 7 995 FL 166 618 699 650 106 2 239 A 329 649 763 547 87 2 375 GA 2 964 6 751 13 660 17 241 1 654 42 270B 15 534 29 877 48 726 55 837 16 778 166 752C 15 555 49 207 121 236 251 101 73 232 510 331Start 18 729 89 925 395 328 1 413 538 383 728 2 301 248Stub 4 277 31 907 279 165 2 625 369 819 513 3 760 231List 4 538 15 932 49 640 170 811 72 040 312 961Assessed 63 583 227 200 911 509 4 536 800 1 367 310 7 106 402Unassessed 114 447 1 185 15 070 396 089 412 905Total 63 697 227 647 912 694 4 551 870 1 763 399 7 519 307500 000 1 000 000 1 500 000 2 000 000 2 500 000 3 000 000 Top High Medium Low Featured articles Featured lists A class articles Good articles B class articles C class articles Start class articles Stub articles Lists Unassessed articles and lists Note The table above prepared by the Wikipedia Version 1 0 Editorial Team is automatically updated daily by User WP 1 0 bot but the bar chart is not auto updated WikiProject Medicine EditWikiProject Medicine formed in 2004 is a Wikipedia WikiProject dedicated to improving coverage of medicine related topics 22 23 24 It has over 200 active volunteers including James Heilman About half of the volunteers are health care professionals or students 22 23 The project has established contacts with organizations such as World Health Organization National Institutes of Health United States National Library of Medicine and Cancer Research UK and succeeded in creating several Wikipedian in residence programs at medical institutions 24 A 2011 review of the project efforts praised it for assessing the vast majority of medical articles on Wikipedia at that time about 25 000 at the same time remarking that only around 70 have been assessed as high quality The reviewer also suggested improvements to the Wikipedia system such as making article assessment more prominent to the readers and requesting that reviewers leave notes on how to improve low quality articles 22 In 2012 a dedicated American NGO Wiki Project Med Foundation WPMEDF was formed to support it 23 25 26 24 A 2016 review noted that the number of high quality articles has improved to about 80 noting that one of them on dengue fever was even formatted and republished in a peer reviewed journal The review praised the efforts of the volunteers but noted that participation levels are too low to promise any significant improvements in the thousands of lower quality articles calling for more medical practitioners to volunteer their time on Wikipedia Regarding the quality of articles the review also pointed that readability complexity of Wikipedia articles may be too high for its intended audience and encouraged the Wikipedia volunteers to review this aspect 24 27 WikiProject Medicine during the COVID 19 pandemic Edit CBS News described the role of Wikipedia s WikiProject Medicine in making Wikipedia a source of medical information relating to the COVID 19 pandemic noting that a project member edits and reviews all the medical content on Wikipedia but also providing the caveat that even though medical pages are strictly monitored by the WikiProject team and hot topics that get a lot of page views are carefully edited inaccurate information persists on some of Wikipedia s less read pages 1 References Edit a b Laudato Anthony May 24 2020 The rise of Wikipedia as a source of medical information CBS News Daley Jason March 15 2016 How a College Student Led the WikiProject Women Scientists Smithsonian Magazine Improving the quality of Wikipedia articles using Cochrane evidence Cochrane Retrieved November 19 2019 a b Phoebe Ayers Charles Matthews Ben Yates How Wikipedia Works And how You Can be a Part of it 2008 p 213 Broughton John 2008 Wikipedia The Missing Manual O Reilly Media pp 165 175 a b Huijing Deng Bernadetta Tarigan Mihai Grigore Juliana Sutanto Understanding the Quality Motion of Wikipedia Articles Through Semantic Convergence Analysis HCI in Business Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol 9191 July 21 2015 p 64 75 Robert E Kraut Paul Resnick Sara Kiesler Building Successful Online Communities 2012 p 207 WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain like military history sports or medicine Robert E Kraut Paul Resnick Sara Kiesler Building Successful Online Communities 2012 p 38 WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain like military history sports or medicine Robert E Kraut Paul Resnick Sara Kiesler Building Successful Online Communities 2012 p 85 WikiProjects are groups of editors who work together on articles within a domain like military history sports or medicine Burke Moira Kraut Robert 2008 Taking up the mop Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 08 p 3441 doi 10 1145 1358628 1358871 ISBN 978 1 60558 012 8 S2CID 5868576 Butler Brian Joyce Elisabeth Pike Jacqueline 2008 Don t look now but we ve created a bureaucracy Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 08 p 1101 doi 10 1145 1357054 1357227 ISBN 9781605580111 S2CID 15211227 Kittur Aniket Suh Bongwon Pendleton Bryan A and Chi Ed H 2007 He says she says conflict and coordination in Wikipedia Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Association for Computing Machinery pp 453 462 doi 10 1145 1240624 1240698 ISBN 978 1 59593 593 9 S2CID 17493296 a href Template Cite book html title Template Cite book cite book a CS1 maint multiple names authors list link Viegas Fernanda B Wattenberg Martin Kriss Jesse van Ham Frank 2007 Talk Before You Type Coordination in Wikipedia 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 575 582 CiteSeerX 10 1 1 210 1057 doi 10 1109 HICSS 2007 511 ISBN 978 0 7695 2755 0 S2CID 5293547 Wikipedia Wikiprojects Wikipedia Database reports WikiProjects by changes Wikipedia Version 1 0 Editorial Team Assessment Poderi Giacomo 8 April 2009 Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia First Monday doi 10 5210 fm v14i5 2365 Retrieved July 13 2010 Fernanda B Viegas Martin Wattenberg amp Matthew M McKeon July 22 2007 The Hidden Order of Wikipedia PDF Visual Communication Lab IBM Research Retrieved October 30 2007 a href Template Cite journal html title Template Cite journal cite journal a Cite journal requires journal help Jemielniak Dariusz Rychwalska Agnieszka Talaga Szymon Ziembowicz Karolina September 2021 Wikiproject Tropical Cyclones The most successful crowd sourced knowledge project with near real time coverage of extreme weather phenomena Weather and Climate Extremes 33 via ScienceDirect Poderi Giacomo Wikipedia and the Featured Articles How a Technological System Can Produce Best Quality Articles Master thesis University of Maastricht October 2008 Lindsey David April 5 2010 Evaluating quality control of Wikipedia s featured articles First Monday 15 4 Retrieved January 29 2017 a b c Trevena L 2011 06 08 WikiProject Medicine BMJ 342 jun08 3 d3387 doi 10 1136 bmj d3387 ISSN 0959 8138 PMID 21653617 S2CID 206893220 a b c James Richard October 2016 WikiProject Medicine Creating Credibility in Consumer Health Journal of Hospital Librarianship 16 4 344 351 doi 10 1080 15323269 2016 1221284 ISSN 1532 3269 S2CID 79020792 a b c d Murray Terry 2015 03 03 WikiProject Medicine making progress Canadian Medical Association Journal 187 4 245 doi 10 1503 cmaj 109 4982 ISSN 0820 3946 PMC 4347770 PMID 25646285 Wiki Project Med Meta meta wikimedia org Retrieved 2021 10 19 Shafee Thomas Masukume Gwinyai Kipersztok Lisa Das Diptanshu Haggstrom Mikael Heilman James 2017 11 01 Evolution of Wikipedia s medical content past present and future J Epidemiol Community Health 71 11 1122 1129 doi 10 1136 jech 2016 208601 ISSN 0143 005X PMC 5847101 PMID 28847845 Heilman James M Wolff Jacob De Beards Graham M Basden Brian J 2014 10 02 Dengue fever a Wikipedia clinical review Open Medicine 8 4 e105 e115 ISSN 1911 2092 PMC 4242787 PMID 25426178 External links EditWikiProject Medicine Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title WikiProject amp oldid 1125113615, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.