United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a serviceman could not file a tort action against the federal government even though the government secretly administered doses of LSD to him as part of an experimental program, because his injuries were found by the lower court to be service-related.
In February 1958, James B. Stanley, a master sergeant in the Army stationed at Fort Knox, Kentucky, volunteered for a chemical warfare testing program. Stanley was administered lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) in a US Army plan to test the effects of the drug on human subjects. Stanley claimed he was unknowingly given the drug.[1]
Stanley claimed that as a result of the LSD exposure, he suffered from hallucinations, periods of incoherence, and memory loss due to his unawareness of having taken the drug. He suffered severe personality changes that led to his discharge and the dissolution of his marriage.
Stanley filed a lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) alleging negligence in the administration, supervision, and subsequent monitoring of the experimental program.
After granting certiorari, the Supreme Court held that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to give orders to dismiss FTCA claims. The Supreme Court also held there was no Bivens claim for the serviceman's injuries because the lower court ruled the injuries occurred during Stanley's military service.
Aftermathedit
In 1994 Congress passed a private claims bill to redress the case. In 1996 an arbitration panel awarded Stanley $400,577 (the maximum amount allowed under the bill) after a 2-1 vote.[2]
Referencesedit
^Norbert Ehrenfreund (2007). The Nuremberg Legacy: How the Nazi War Crimes Trials Changed the Course of History. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 151. ISBN978-0-230-61078-1.
^Bob Erlandson, Ex-sergeant compensated for LSD experiments Tests by Army, CIA done at Edgewood, March 07, 1996, Baltimore Sun
External linksedit
Text of United States v. Stanley, 483U.S. 669 (1987) is available from:JustiaLibrary of CongressOyez (oral argument audio)
Tom Bowman, Former sergeant seeks compensation for LSD testing at Edgewood Arsenal, July 11, 1991, Baltimore Sun
Oral history interview with James Stanley
April 10, 2024
united, states, stanley, this, article, needs, additional, citations, verification, please, help, improve, this, article, adding, citations, reliable, sources, unsourced, material, challenged, removed, find, sources, news, newspapers, books, scholar, jstor, ju. This article needs additional citations for verification Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources Unsourced material may be challenged and removed Find sources United States v Stanley news newspapers books scholar JSTOR June 2013 Learn how and when to remove this template message United States v Stanley 483 U S 669 1987 was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a serviceman could not file a tort action against the federal government even though the government secretly administered doses of LSD to him as part of an experimental program because his injuries were found by the lower court to be service related United States v StanleySupreme Court of the United StatesArgued April 21 1987Decided June 25 1987Full case nameUnited States et al v James B StanleyCitations483 U S 669 more 107 S Ct 3054 97 L Ed 2d 550 1987 U S LEXIS 2890 55 U S L W 5101ArgumentOral argumentHoldingServicemen may not maintain a Bivens action for injuries arising out of activity incident to service Court membershipChief Justice William Rehnquist Associate Justices William J Brennan Jr Byron WhiteThurgood Marshall Harry BlackmunLewis F Powell Jr John P StevensSandra Day O Connor Antonin ScaliaCase opinionsMajorityScalia joined by Rehnquist White Blackmun Powell Brennan Marshall Stevens O Connor part I Concur dissentBrennan joined by Marshall Stevens part III Concur dissentO Connor Contents 1 Background 2 Opinion of the Court 3 Aftermath 4 References 5 External linksBackground editIn February 1958 James B Stanley a master sergeant in the Army stationed at Fort Knox Kentucky volunteered for a chemical warfare testing program Stanley was administered lysergic acid diethylamide LSD in a US Army plan to test the effects of the drug on human subjects Stanley claimed he was unknowingly given the drug 1 Stanley claimed that as a result of the LSD exposure he suffered from hallucinations periods of incoherence and memory loss due to his unawareness of having taken the drug He suffered severe personality changes that led to his discharge and the dissolution of his marriage Stanley filed a lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act FTCA alleging negligence in the administration supervision and subsequent monitoring of the experimental program The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the serviceman could assert his claims under the FTCA and refused to dismiss the serviceman s Bivens claims Opinion of the Court editAfter granting certiorari the Supreme Court held that the circuit court had no jurisdiction to give orders to dismiss FTCA claims The Supreme Court also held there was no Bivens claim for the serviceman s injuries because the lower court ruled the injuries occurred during Stanley s military service Aftermath editIn 1994 Congress passed a private claims bill to redress the case In 1996 an arbitration panel awarded Stanley 400 577 the maximum amount allowed under the bill after a 2 1 vote 2 References edit Norbert Ehrenfreund 2007 The Nuremberg Legacy How the Nazi War Crimes Trials Changed the Course of History Palgrave Macmillan p 151 ISBN 978 0 230 61078 1 Bob Erlandson Ex sergeant compensated for LSD experiments Tests by Army CIA done at Edgewood March 07 1996 Baltimore SunExternal links editText of United States v Stanley 483 U S 669 1987 is available from Justia Library of Congress Oyez oral argument audio Tom Bowman Former sergeant seeks compensation for LSD testing at Edgewood Arsenal July 11 1991 Baltimore Sun Oral history interview with James Stanley Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title United States v Stanley amp oldid 1175152054, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
