Tutankhamun's mummy

Tutankhamun's mummy was discovered by English Egyptologist Howard Carter and his team on 28 October 1925 in tomb KV62 of Egypt's Valley of the Kings.^[1] Tutankhamun was the 13th pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty of the New Kingdom of Egypt, making his mummy over 3,300 years old.^[2] Tutankhamun's mummy is the only royal mummy to have been found entirely undisturbed.^[3]

Tutankhamun's mummy

The mummy of Tutankhamun as photographed in 1926
Location	KV62, Valley of the Kings
Date discovered	28 October 1925
Excavated by	Howard Carter

The burial chamber was found in 1922, but was not opened until a year later. Two years passed between the discovery of the tomb and that of the mummy and its famous death mask. The discovery of the tomb as a whole was one of the most significant and famous archeological discoveries in modern times. There has been much speculation about the king's life and cause of death since very little information about him is known.^[4]

King Tutankhamun

Main article: Tutankhamun

Tutankhamun was the 13th pharaoh of the 18th Dynasty of the New Kingdom and ruled for about a decade c. 1355–1346 BCE. A majority of his reign was devoted to restoring Egyptian culture, including religious and political policies; his predecessor and father Akhenaten had altered many Egyptian cultural aspects during his reign, and one of Tutankhamun's many restoration policies included changing the political capital from Akhenaten's Amarna back to Memphis. After an initial examination of the 3,300-year-old mummy, it was estimated that Tutankhamun was a teenager of approximately 19 years of age when he died.^[5] Since it was believed that Tutankhamun became king as a child no more than ten years old, many refer to him as the "Boy-King" or "Child-King". Following the discovery of Tutankhamun's mummy, much debate has arisen as to his exact cause of death. This has led to numerous medical studies and procedures performed on his remains. As medical technology has advanced throughout the years, new techniques have been utilized on the mummy to discover the true age, genealogy, and cause of death of the young pharaoh, speculated by some to be from a blow to the head, battle wound, or a chariot accident, so that some of the mysteries surrounding the "Boy-King" might finally be resolved.

Discovery of tomb and mummy

Main articles: Discovery of the tomb of Tutankhamun and Tomb of Tutankhamun

 

Cross-section of shrines and sarcophagi in KV62

In 1914 Howard Carter and his sponsor George Herbert, 5th Earl of Carnarvon obtained the concession to excavate in the Valley of the Kings. Carter believed the Valley contained at least one more royal tomb, that of Tutankhamun. Excavators working for Theodore M. Davis, the previous holder of the concession, had discovered artefacts bearing his name clustered in the centre of the Valley, including the small pit tomb KV58, which Davis declared to be Tutankhamun's tomb. However, Carter believed that the king's tomb was still undiscovered, hidden under piles of debris from earlier excavations. Following a systematic clearance that began in 1917, Carter's team would discover the real tomb of Tutankhamun on 4 November 1922.^[6]

 

The unbroken seal securing the doors of the second or third shrine^[7]

The tomb was robbed twice in antiquity but overall much of it was left intact and some areas including the burial chamber appeared to be left unscathed.^[8] Ancient robbers had entered the chamber and unsealed the doors of the outermost of the series of shrines that surrounded Tutankhamun's sarcophagus. However, the doors of the second and third shrines were intact, sealed with stamped cords; the doors of the innermost shrine were left unsealed in antiquity.^[9][10] These unbroken seals, with no evidence of re-sealing, indicated that the 3300 year old burial of the king was intact.^[11] Over the course of eighty days, the shrines were dismantled and removed from the chamber.^[12] On 3 January 1924, the doors of the third and fourth (innermost) shrines were opened, revealing the king's sarcophagus, of yellow quartzite with a granite lid tinted to match.^[13]

On 12 February 1924, the lid of the sarcophagus was raised in the presence of Egyptian government officials and Egyptologists.^[14][15] Within lay the 2.1-metre (7 ft) long outermost mummiform coffin of gilded wood, covered by linen shrouds. The shrouds were rolled back, revealing the coffin bore the portrait of the king, his face and hands of a lighter-coloured gold alloy than the rest of the coffin, "conveying an impression of the greyness of death".^[16] Around the vulture and uraeus on his brow was placed a "tiny wreath of flowers...still retaining their colour".^[17] The sarcophagus lid was left suspended, as a tour was scheduled for reporters the following day, along with the wives of Carter's collaborators. The visit of the wives was refused by government officials, a note from Mohammed Pasha Zaghlul informed Carter that the wives would need permission to visit. Carter and his team, citing "impossible restrictions and discourtesies" resigned in protest, closing the tomb and suspending work.^[18] Under the direction of the Egyptian government, Pierre Lacau was ordered to cut the locks on the tomb and secure the sarcophagus lid.^[19] After a series of events, including the cancellation of the excavation permit, his unsuccessfully suing of the Antiquities Service, and a lecture-tour of America, Carter would return to the excavation in late January 1925 after reaching a new agreement regarding the continued clearance of the tomb.^[20]

The nested coffins were opened the following excavation season, in late 1925.^[21] The lid of the outermost coffin, secured by silver pins with gilded heads, was raised on its silver handles to reveal a second mummiform coffin, extensively inlaid with coloured glass, wreathed with floral garlands and shrouded in "gossamer thin linen, much darkened and decayed".^[22] This second coffin showed "distinct signs of the effect of some form of dampness", a fact that Carter found "disconcerting" as it indicated the presence of humidity within the coffins, suggesting the king's mummy would not be as well preserved as hoped.^[22] This middle coffin fitted tightly within the outermost, lacked handles and was "exceedingly" heavy. The silver pins securing the lid were withdrawn as far as possible, wrapped with copper wire, and the basin of the outermost coffin was lowered back into the sarcophagus, leaving the middle coffin free, quickly being supported by a wooden tray. The pins were removed, and the lid raised by means of four metal eyelets screwed on to serve as handles. The innermost coffin, made of solid gold, was covered with a red shroud, save for the face, and wore a large floral collar.^[23] It was covered from chest to ankles with unguents, which filled the space between the two coffins and stuck them firmly together.^[24] The narrow space between the coffins meant the gold nails that secured the lid could not be withdrawn, and were instead "removed piecemeal" with screwdrivers. Finally, on 28 October 1925,^[25] the "lid was raised by its golden handles and the mummy of the king was disclosed."^[26]

The wrapped mummy

 

Tutankhamun's mummy within the innermost coffin, as revealed in late October 1925

Before us, occupying the whole of the interior of the golden coffin, was an impressive, neat and carefully made mummy, over which had been poured anointing unguents as in the outside of its coffin - again in great quantity - consolidated and blackened by age.^[26]

Tutankhamun's wrapped mummy lay at a slight angle within the coffin. The level of dark unguents differed between the right and left sides, suggesting that the coffin had tilted, presumably while being lowered into the sarcophagus.^[27] The life-like curves of the body were reproduced with layers of padding beneath the tight outer shroud.^[28] Covering the head and shoulders of the mummy was a gold mask, which had fallen back slightly, its "gaze straight up to the heavens."^[29] Characterised by Carter as a "beautiful and unique specimen of ancient portraiture"^[30] it depicts the king as the god Osiris with a curled divine beard and wearing the striped nemes-headdress with vulture and uraeus emblems at the brow. Over the shoulders the mask takes the form of a broad collar with falcon-headed terminals. At the throat was a separate triple stranded necklace of faience, red and yellow gold disc beads. The mask is extensively inlaid with coloured glass, faience, and stones including lapis lazuli, carnelian, feldspar, and obsidian. The back of the mask is inscribed with Chapter 151b of the Book of the Dead.^[31]

Sewn onto the shroud immediately below the mask were a pair of separate gold hands, holding a decayed crook and flail. Between the hands sat a large resin scarab, bearing the image of the Bennu-bird and inscribed with Chapter 29b of the Book of the Dead, suspended on flexible straps originally prepared for Ankhkeperure. Below these were gold mummy bands with inlaid text, originating from a large gold ba-bird with outstretched wings. The mummy bands were constructed of separate gold plaques linked together along the sides by strings of tiny beads. They overlaid the vertical and horizontal fabric bands that secured the shroud at the centre front, biceps, hips, knees, and ankles. The text of the single vertical band has speeches by Nut and Geb while the four horizontal bands declare the deceased king is "honoured before" the funerary deities Anubis, Osiris, Hapi, Qebehsenuef, and Duamutef. Along the sides, the bands became "festoons of even more ornate straps" attached to the horizontal bands and made of "elaborate small inlaid gold plaques" in the forms of djeds, tyets, uraei, and cartouches. The bands too had originally been prepared for Ankhkheperure and were altered to fit Tutankhamun.^[32][33]

The outer wrappings and ornaments of Tutankhamun's mummy were in a deteriorated state. Carter estimated that "something like two bucketsful" of unguents had been poured over the mummy,^[34] which was a source of humidity within the closed coffins. Additionally, the unguents had undergone a chemical reaction, characterised by Carter as "a kind of slow spontaneous combustion", which carbonised the linen wrappings.^[35] The combination of heat and humidity had negatively affected the trappings of the mummy too. The crook and flail had disintegrated, the resin scarab was cracked, and the threads securing the separate hands and mummy bands were decayed, rendering the whole assemblage very fragile and which "fell apart at the slightest touch".^[36] Furthermore, the unguents had hardened over the millennia, sticking the mummy and mask to the bottom of the coffin. Attempts were made to separate the mummy from the inner and middle coffin troughs by placing them in the midday sun for several hours, with the temperature reaching 65 °C (149 °F).^[37] However, the mummy remained "firmly fixed" to the coffin so the initial examination was carried out in situ.^[38]

Initial examination

 

Anatomist Douglas Derry makes the first incision into the wrappings of Tutankhamun's mummy.^[28]

Unwrapping

The unwrapping and examination of Tutankhamun's mummy began at 9:45am on 11 November 1925 in the outer corridor of KV15.^[39] Carter had intended the examination to take place at the start of the excavation season in October but it had been delayed by a month to allow Pierre Lacau to attend.^[40] It was conducted by the anatomists Douglas Derry, the professor of anatomy at Cairo's School of Medicine, and Saleh Hamdi Bey, the former head of the same school.^[41] Those present on the first day included government officials, Egyptologists, and members of Carter's team. The external ornaments of the mummy had been removed, except for the firmly-stuck mask.^[39] This examination was an unprecedented opportunity to study the methods and techniques used in the wrapping of a royal mummy.^[35] However, the outermost layers of linen were very fragile making it immediately apparent that "no orderly unwrapping was possible".^[42] Instead, the fabric was stabilised with a very thin layer of liquid paraffin wax before a central incision was made from the edge of the mask to the ankles, and the fabric was peeled back and removed in pieces.^[43][44]

The removal of the top layers of bandages exposed the first of the 150 objects included within the "voluminous" wrappings of the king's mummy.^[33][44] These items were distributed across many bandage layers and were often grouped together. They included personal jewellery worn by the king in life; ceremonial items of clothing; weapons, including an iron-bladed dagger now known to be made of meteoric iron; and funerary jewellery and amulets, the quantity, materials, and positions of which were dictated by the Book of the Dead, to protect and assist the deceased king in his journey to the afterlife.^[33] The examination slowed to allow the careful exposure, recording, and photographing of the objects.^[43]

The inner bandages were in worse condition than the exterior layers, having been reduced to dust.^[28] As a result, the exact wrapping method and arrangement of the padding and sheets was for the most part "impossible to follow".^[43] In general, the wrapping techniques and methods conformed to what was seen on other noble mummies of the same era.^[45] Large quantities of folded linen pads were used over the torso and thighs to provide shape. The outermost and innermost bandages were of extremely fine linen while the middle layers of bandages were of coarser fabric. Elaborate bandaging was noted over the shoulders and chest, with bandages criss-crossed over the shoulders and around the torso; a similar arrangement was seen around the crotch.^[46] The limbs were first separately wrapped, as were the fingers and toes, which were capped with gold finger and toe stalls, placed after the first layers of bandages had been applied. On the feet were gold foil sandals.^[47]

The first part of Tutankhamun's mummy to be exposed was his lower legs and feet, with the examination being carried out from the feet upwards.^[48] The body proved to be in very poor condition, being a "greyish-white colour, very brittle and exhibiting numerous cracks".^[49] The better preserved state of other royal mummies may be due to their robbery soon after burial, before the oils and resins could soak through the wrappings.^[50] It was hoped that Tutankhamun's mummy could be separated from the coffin by removing some of the outer layers of bandaging. However, the resins and unguents had penetrated the wrappings, adhering the body itself to the coffin. Ultimately, the body had to be chiseled out.^[44] The torso was cut in half at the level of the hips to remove the pelvis and legs from the coffin. The arms were disarticulated at the shoulders, elbows, and wrists in order to continue the unwrapping of the torso and to remove bracelets;^[51][52] each body part was treated with hot paraffin wax to stabilise it.^[45] The hands and feet were later reattached with resin.^[53] Lastly, hot knives were used to remove the head and neck from the mask.^[51][54] To view the condition of the teeth, Derry made an incision around the inner edge of the jaw and across the throat; this damage was repaired with resin.^[55] This thorough disarticulation of the body gave clear views of the ends of each of the relevant bones, allowing the anatomists to make an accurate estimate of the king's age.^[51] Tutankhamun was estimated to be eighteen at the time of his death and of slight build, with a projected height in life of 1.68 metres (5.5 ft).^[56]

The examination of Tutankhamun's mummy concluded on 19 November 1925.^[57] The dismembered mummy was placed on wooden tray filled with sand, surrounded by a packing of cotton wool and fabric bandages.^[58] The beaded linen skull-cap on the head and broad collar on the chest were treated with a layer of wax and left in place.^[59][60] The body was returned to the outermost coffin within the sarcophagus on the morning of 23 October 1926.^[61]

Description of the mummy

 

Tutankhamun's mummified head wearing a linen skull-cap with beaded uraei with Aten cartouches at the centres of their hoods.^[62]

The mummy was in poor condition, being a greyish colour, and covered in numerous cracks. The head was a darker colour but in much the same condition. Spots of natron, the drying agent used in the mummification process, were present on the head and shoulders.^[54] Tutankhamun's face, when finally revealed, had a "serene and placid countenance", recognisable from his monuments.^[63] He was noted as bearing a close resemblance to the KV55 mummy, having the same uncommon broad and low (platycephalic) skull shape. This similarity indicated a close genetic relationship to the royal line; it was previously thought he had gained the throne only through marriage to Akhenaten's daughter Ankhesenamun.^[64] His head was shaved, and wore a tight-fitting linen cap with a gold brow-band and a beaded design of uraei. The eyes, with long eyelashes, were partly open; no padding had been placed in the orbits. The nose was flattened by the layers of bandaging and the nostrils were plugged with rolls of resin-soaked linen. The brain had been removed through the nose and resin introduced into the skull cavity. The top lip had drawn back a little to reveal large front teeth which were smeared with resin. The face was clean-shaven; on the left cheek near the ear was a "rounded depression...resembling a scab." The "small and well made" ears were pierced for earrings, the hole measuring 7.5 millimetres (0.30 in) in diameter.^[65][66]

The chest was covered by a large bib-like broad collar of small blue and yellow glass beads edged with gold sequins and drop beads.^[67] The arms were bent at the elbows and the forearms positioned parallel, left over right, over the torso.^[68] The fingers were sheathed in gold stalls.^[69] The organs were removed through an embalming incision approximately 86 millimetres (3.4 in) long, running from the navel to the left hip bone. This location is different to other royal mummies of that time period, who have the incision running from hip to groin.^[59] This cut was covered by an embalming plate, although not placed directly on the skin but in the bandage layers above.^[49] The body cavity packed with resin-soaked linen which had set to "rock-like hardness".^[59] The king's penis was wrapped separately and placed into an erect (ithyphallic) position, held in place by the crossed bandages; Derry could not say if he was circumcised. No pubic hair was evident, and the scrotum was flattened against the perineum.^[49] The toes were covered by gold stalls and the feet wore gold sandals.^[70]

Objects within the wrappings

Many items were included within and placed throughout the layers of bandaging on the royal mummy. Some objects, such as the gold foil jewellery and amulets, were purely funerary in nature, while others like the bracelets and pectorals were worn by the king in life. In the bandage layers of the head, Tutankhamun wore various forms of headwear including an inlaid gold fillet^[71] and a padded khat-headdress with a gold brow band, flexible gold uraeus, and Nekhbet-vulture with open wings across the top of the head.^[72] An iron headrest amulet was found at the back of the head^[71] and a four-stranded bead necklace was across the throat.^[73]

Around his neck were twenty amulets of various forms and materials including stones such as a red jasper tyet, a green feldspar was-sceptre, and a carnelian snake head, all suspended on gold wires. Eight further amulets were of sheet gold in various forms including uraei, vultures, and a human-headed winged snake, were tied around the neck by strings.^[74] The chest and upper torso was covered in thirty-five objects such as sheet gold collars; flexible inlaid collars; a resin scarab on a long wire; bracelets; and large pectoral necklaces distributed over thirteen bandage layers.^[67]

Tutankhamun's forearms were covered from elbow to wrist with 11 bracelets (seven on the right arm and six on the left), all of which were likely worn in life, and bore devices of scarabs, eyes of Horus, and display a wide variety of techniques and materials.^[75] Rings of various materials including gold, stone, and resin were also included in the wrappings, with a group of five over the right wrist, and eight beside the left wrist.^[67] Tutankhamun wore two gold rings on the middle and ring fingers of his left hand; the bezels depict a kneeling king presenting a figure of the goddess Maat, and a lunar barque atop a lapis lazuli background respectively.^[69]

On the abdomen were Y and T-shaped sheet gold amulets; several necklaces, including a broad collar of dark blue faience beads; a bracelet or armlet; and a bead girdle. Around his waist and hips were two gold foil girdles with ceremonial tails; each had an associated kilt apron laid over the thighs (one of beadwork, and one of flexible inlaid gold plates) and dagger on the right side.^[76] One of these daggers had an iron blade,^[77] now known to be made of meteoric iron.^[78] Additionally, seven bracelets or armlets and four inlaid collars were placed over the knees and shins.^[79]

Later studies

1968 x-rays

 

An X-ray of Tutankhamun's head showing two levels of resin inside the skull

In 1968 R. G. Harrison, a professor of anatomy, used a portable x-ray machine to re-examine the mummy of Tutankhamun. Harrison quickly discovered that Carter had dismembered the mummy, something that is not mentioned in his publication. The mummy, surrounded by cotton wool and secured by modern bandages, had deteriorated since last photographed by Carter's team in 1926. The beaded skull-cap had disappeared, as had most of the skin on the head; the eyes appeared to be wide open, and the ears were largely destroyed. The beaded collar was gone, as was the front wall of the king's chest; stray beads from this necklace were seen scattered in the torso on the x-rays. The limbs had been moved and further disarticulated, with the left hand and thumb of the right hand found in the sand under the body.^[80][81] Although not mentioned by Harrison, the king's penis was also missing.^[81] The additional damage to the mummy and the removal of the skullcap and collar likely occurred during World War II,^[60] and components suggested to be from the collar have since appeared on the antiquities market.^[82]

The x-rays revealed two levels of resin inside the skull. One was introduced when the body was lying on its back, pooling at the back of the head; the other when the head was tilted far back, settling at the top of the skull. Also present in the skull cavity were small bone fragments which Harrison initially believed to be the result of the embalming process. The fact that skull fragments were discovered led many to assume the king was murdered by a blow to the head, but the X-ray could not support or discredit this theory. His age at death was again estimated to be around 18, with a projected height in life of 168.9 centimetres (5 ft 6.5 in).^[80] Serological analysis undertaken by the same team determined that Tutankhamun and the KV55 mummy had the same blood group, further indicating a familial relationship.^[83]

2005 CT scan

On January 15, 2005, under the direction of Zahi Hawass, Tutankhamun's mummy was removed from his tomb and a CT scan was performed using a portable machine. The scan allowed for accurate forensic reconstruction of his body and face, as well as further evidence of his cause of death. The results showed that the bone fragments inside the skull had moved, indicating that traumatic injury to the head happened after death, and murder due to blunt force trauma was ruled out. He also had a small cleft palate that probably went unnoticed, and the elongated shape of his skull was within the normal range and appeared to be a family trait. Based on bone maturity and his wisdom teeth, Tutankhamun was confirmed to be 19 years old at the time of his death. The CT scan proved Tutankhamun was in good health and did not show any signs of disease. The study suggested that a previously unnoticed leg fracture may have contributed to his death.^[84][85]

DNA testing

From September 2007 to October 2009, eleven royal mummies of the New Kingdom's 18th Dynasty underwent extensive genetic and radiological testing. A team of doctors, under the leadership of Zahi Hawass, took DNA samples from bone tissue of the eleven mummies to determine a family pedigree and to determine if any familial or pathological diseases caused Tutankhamun's death. The study was able to provide a five-generation pedigree, and the KV55 mummy and the KV35 Younger Lady were identified as Tutankhamun's sibling parents.^[86] Four of the mummies, including Tutankhamun, were shown to have had malaria. Based on all the data, the study concluded the most likely cause of death for the young king was the combination of avascular necrosis, malaria and a leg fracture.^[87]

Health

Further information: Tutankhamun § Health and death

Tutankhamun's mummy has been studied to provide more information about his general health and to look for any conditions that may have contributed to his death. Analysis of the body is complicated by the poor condition of the mummy and damage sustained during its disarticulation. The many varying results of the studies "highlight the complexities of palaeopathology: how a single individual, who has been studied in detail by so many groups, can yield so many and sometimes contradictory" results.^[88]

The initial 1925 examination did not mention any signs of disease, and the first x-ray study ruled out tuberculosis.^[89] Subsequently, a wide variety of health conditions have been proposed for Tutankhamun, based on both his unusual depiction in art and his mummy. The theorised conditions are many and varied; those that involve internal organs or soft tissue are hard to prove due to their mummified state.^[90] Those that affect fertility such as an adrenal tumor, Klinefelter syndrome, or Fröhlich syndrome (adiposogenital dystrophy) are disproven by his fathering of two daughters. Disorders that produce gynecomastia such as aromatase excess syndrome, or the proposed "Tutankhamun syndrome", or affect the ribs and sternum such as pectus carinatum (pigeon chest) cannot be proven as the front wall of the chest is missing. His skull shape, although unusual, shows no signs of resulting from Antley–Bixler syndrome or Marfan syndrome.^[87] Inherited temporal lobe epilepsy, suggested to explain the increased religiosity in the reigns of his immediate predecessors and their early deaths, has little physical evidence to support it.^[91]

In 2010, a team led by Zahi Hawass diagnosed Tutankhamun with a clubbed left foot with avascular necrosis of the second and third metatarsals (Köhler disease II).^[92] However, the diagnosis of clubfoot is disputed.^[93] The 1960s x-ray report noted no abnormalities and characterises both feet as "cramped" by bandaging.^[94] James Gamble suggests that the foot is not clubbed but a result of Tutankhamun habitually walking on the outside of his foot due to the pain caused by the necrosis.^[95] Depictions of Tutankhamun doing archery while seated and the presence of 130 canes in the tomb was used as evidence to support Hawass's claim that Tutankhamun had a walking impairment.^[87] However, both are indications of prestige, not a reflection of their owner's health.^[96] Depictions of kings shooting while seated date back to the Old Kingdom and canes were common symbols of status in ancient Egypt and frequently included in burials.^[97][98] The canes show no sign of heavy use and his footwear shows even wear on both feet.^[99]

DNA testing revealed the presence of Plasmodium falciparum, the most severe type of malaria.^[87]

Cause of death

Since the discovery of Tutankhamun's mummy, there has been a lot of speculation and theories on the exact cause of death, which until recent studies had been hard to prove with the evidence and data available. While it was a widely debated topic for many Egyptologists, it had also spread to the general public as popular culture has come up with many conspiracy theories that played out in movies, TV shows, and fictional books. Author James Patterson has even recently written his own take in his book, The Murder of King Tut.^[100] There are many educated and respected Egyptologists as well as trained professionals in other fields^[101][102] who have devoted a lot of time researching Tutankhamun and who have varying beliefs to his cause of death. Some have stood by their theories even in light of new evidence. Some of the theories are better known and supported than others.

The initial examination of the mummy reported the body showed "no traces of the cause or causes of the young king's death".^[103] Bone fragments seen inside the skull in the 1960s x-rays led Harrison to propose that Tutankhamun died from a blow to the head. This has led to "endless speculation as to whether (or how) the king was brutally attacked or murdered",^[91] with Tutankhamun's vizier Ay considered the most likely culprit as he stood to gain the most from the young king's early death and ultimately succeeded him as pharaoh.^[104][101] It is now known that they are a result of the mummy's modern unwrapping as the fragments are loose inside the skull^[105] and there is no evidence of bone thinning or calcified membranes indicative of a fatal blow to the head.^[106] Death as a result of a brain tumor^[107][108] was also not supported by anatomical studies.^[109]

An accidental death is often suggested, with varying causes. A chariot crash resulting in either a fatal fall or being run over, a kick from a horse, or trauma sustained in an attack by a hippopotamus are all put forward to explain his early death and the apparent trauma to his chest. Frank Rühli and Salima Ikram consider the latter two theories unlikely. They suggest that as the king was apparently an experienced charioteer (six were found in his tomb), he would be unlikely to stand in range of a horse kick. Additionally, even if a hippo was encountered, his bodyguards would have protected him; Thutmose III was protected by his guards from an attacking elephant while hunting.^[110]

The most recent CT study lead by Hawass has attributed Tutankhamun's early death to a combination of multiple factors including a leg fracture and malaria. The fracture of the left leg has resin within it, indicating an associated open wound was present at the time of death. They suggest that the fracture was the result of a fall, and turned fatal either through infection or in combination with a severe malarial infection.^[87][111] However, Christian Timmann and Christian Meyer have argued that sickle cell anemia better fits the pathologies exhibited by the king. They suggest that the sickle-cell disease turned fatal when Tutankhamun also contracted severe malaria. He is expected to have been homozygous recessive for the sickle cell gene, thus making him not immune to severe malaria, which would have been fatal.^[112] This suggestion has been called "interesting and plausible" by the Egyptian team.^[113]

Mummification style

Regardless of the exact cause, it is clear that the young king's death was unexpected. The placement of the mummy's embalming incision is unique.^[114] This, combined with the two levels of resin inside his skull, have led to suggestions that an initial mummification was carried out by an inexperienced embalmer. His arms are crossed horizontally over the torso instead of diagonally over the chest, and his penis was embalmed in an erect position.^[115] Salima Ikram has suggested that these variations are deliberate, and a reflection of the restoration of traditional ancient Egyptian religion during his reign. The position of his arms, with elbows jutting, combined with his ithyphallic pose and the copious use of dark oils and resins, make the dead king into the very image of Osiris, god of the dead and regeneration.^[116] Marianne Eaton-Krauss cautions that royal mummifications were not standardised in the Eighteenth Dynasty and the known mummies of rulers closest to Tutankhamun, those of Amenhotep III and the KV55 mummy, are largely skeletonised and cannot be used for comparison.^[117]

Christine El Mahdy, an Egyptologist, uses the original assumption from Carter's examination that Tutankhamun had a quick burial ceremony since some elements of the mummification appeared rushed, as proof that he needed to be buried quickly following his unexpected death because the man who was next in line for the throne wanted to avoid a power struggle that might have occurred if the burial process had taken too long. By speeding up the burial ceremony, the new pharaoh maintained order in Egypt.^[118]

Implications and impact of discovery

The royal bloodline that Tutankhamun's family shared ended with the death of the young pharaoh, and with that came a question of the legitimacy of the following rulers.^[85] His tomb was the only one discovered that was not very disturbed by grave robbers, which allowed Carter to uncover many artifacts and the untouched mummy. It gave amazing insight into the royal burials, mummification, and tombs of the New Kingdom's 18th Dynasty.^[119] Since its discovery and widespread popularity, it has led to DNA testing done on it and other mummies from the time period that now give a proven family tree for many of the royalty during the 18th Dynasty.^[87] Since his death was unexpected and either poorly recorded or simply the records were lost over the years, with the discovery of his mummy and advances in modern technology, there is now strong and supported evidence as to Tutankhamun's death, and with that one of Egypt's most popular mysteries appears to have been solved.

A public interest in archaeology rose after the discovery of the mummy.^[4]

The examination of the king's mummy was little-reported in both Arab and Western media at the time. Ikram observes that "the king's body was of less interest to the public than his treasures, or the alleged curse", which continued to be published on into the 1930s, after the clearance of the tomb was completed.^[120]

Current location

 

Tutankhamun's mummy displayed in a climate-controlled case within his tomb

In 1926, following the conclusion of the initial examination, Tutankhamun's mummy was placed back into his gilded outermost coffin, which was then put back into the sarcophagus; a sheet of glass was placed over the top, allowing visitors to view the coffin.^[80]

On 4 November 2007, 85 years to the day after Carter's discovery, Tutankhamun's mummy was placed on display in his underground tomb at Luxor, when the linen-wrapped mummy was removed from its golden coffin to a climate-controlled glass box. The case was designed to prevent the heightened rate of decomposition caused by the humidity and warmth from tourists visiting the tomb.^[121]

As of mid-2022, there are plans to move his body to the Grand Egyptian Museum in Cairo, to be displayed together with the entire contents of his tomb.^[122]

See also

• List of Egyptian mummies (royalty)

References

Citations

1. Carter 1927.
2. Carter & Mace 1923.
3. Ikram 2022, p. 11.
4. Mace 1975.
5. Eaton-Krauss 2001, pp. 452–453.
6. Carter & Mace 1923, pp. 75–87.
7. Carter 1927, p. 241.
8. James 2001.
9. Reeves 1990, p. 100.
10. Carter & Mace 1923, p. 183.
11. Carter 1927, pp. 33–34.
12. Carter 1927, pp. 42–47.
13. James 2000, p. 327.
14. James 2000, p. 333.
15. Carter 1925, pp. 49–51.
16. Carter 1927, p. 52.
17. Carter 1927, pp. 52–53.
18. James 2000, pp. 336–337.
19. James 2000, p. 346.
20. James 2000, pp. 336–383.
21. Carter 1927, p. 64.
22. Carter 1927, p. 72.
23. Carter 1927, pp. 74–79.
24. Carter 1927, pp. 79–82.
25. Carter 1925.
26. Carter 1927, pp. 82–83.
27. Carter 1927, p. 107.
28. Reeves 1990, p. 116.
29. Carter 1925b.
30. Carter 1927, p. 83.
31. Reeves 1990, pp. 111–114.
32. Carter 1927, pp. 83–85.
33. Reeves 1990, p. 114.
34. Carter 1927, p. 87.
35. Carter 1927, p. 101.
36. Carter 1927, p. 86.
37. Carter 1927, pp. 86–87.
38. Derry 1927, p. 148.
39. Carter 1927, pp. 106–107.
40. James 2000, p. 396.
41. Ikram 2021, p. 205.
42. Derry 1927, pp. 148–149.
43. Derry 1927, p. 149.
44. Carter 1927, p. 108.
45. Leek 1972, p. 6.
46. Derry 1927, pp. 150–151.
47. Derry 1927, p. 151.
48. Carter 1927, p. 109.
49. Derry 1927, p. 156.
50. Carter 1927, p. 102.
51. Leek 1972, pp. 12–13, 18.
52. Ikram 2022, p. 14.
53. Hawass et al. 2007, p. 160.
54. Reeves 1990, p. 117.
55. Leek 1972, pp. 1–18.
56. Derry 1927, pp. 157–160.
57. Leek 1972, p. 8.
58. Harrison & Abdalla 1972, p. 9.
59. Derry 1927, p. 155.
60. Forbes, Ikram & Kamrin 2007.
61. Carter 1926.
62. Carter 1927, p. 113.
63. Carter 1927, pp. 113, 116.
64. Carter 1927, p. 114.
65. Derry 1927, pp. 152–155.
66. Leek 1972, p. 14.
67. Carter 1927, p. 127.
68. Carter 1927, p. 128.
69. Carter 1927, pp. 129–130.
70. Carter 1927, p. 137.
71. Carter 1927, p. 110.
72. Carter 1927, pp. 112–113.
73. Carter 1927, p. 118.
74. Carter 1927, pp. 116–117.
75. Carter 1927, p. 129.
76. Carter 1927, pp. 130–135.
77. Carter 1927, pp. 134–135.
78. Comelli et al. 2016.
79. Carter 1927, pp. 136–137.
80. Harrison & Abdalla 1972.
81. Ikram 2022.
82. Gabolde 2016.
83. Harrison, Connolly & Abdalla 1969.
84. Hawass et al. 2007.
85. Williams 2005.
86. Hawass et al. 2010, p. 641.
87. Hawass et al. 2010.
88. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 4.
89. Harrison & Abdalla 1972, p. 12.
90. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 5.
91. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 7.
92. Hawass et al. 2010, pp. 642–643.
93. Marchant 2011.
94. Harrison & Abdalla 1972, p. 13.
95. Gamble 2010.
96. Eaton-Krauss 2016, p. 105.
97. Johnson 2015, p. 22.
98. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 6.
99. Ikram 2022, p. 20.
100. Patterson & Dugard 2009.
101. King, Cooper & DeNevi 2006.
102. Timmann & Meyer 2010.
103. Carter 1927, p. 139.
104. Brier 1998.
105. Hawass & Saleem 2016, pp. 101–102.
106. Boyer et al. 2003.
107. El Mahdy 1999, p. 303.
108. Doherty 2002.
109. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 9.
110. Rühli & Ikram 2013, p. 8.
111. Hawass & Saleem 2016, pp. 96–97.
112. Timmann & Meyer 2010, p. 1279.
113. Marchant 2010.
114. Hawass & Saleem 2016, p. 206.
115. Ikram 2013.
116. Ikram 2013, pp. 298–300.
117. Eaton-Krauss 2016, pp. 103–104.
118. El Mahdy 1999, p. 298.
119. Carter & Mace 1977.
120. Ikram 2021, p. 208.
121. McCarthy 2007.
122. Ikram 2022, pp. 20–21.

Bibliography

• Boyer, R.S.; Rodin, E.A.; Grey, T.C.; Connolly, R.C. (2003). "The skull and cervical spine radiographs of Tutankhamen: a critical appraisal" (PDF). AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 24 (6): 1142–7. PMC 8149017. PMID 12812942. Retrieved 15 September 2019.
• Brier, Bob (1998). The Murder of Tutankhamen : a true story. New York: Berkley Books. ISBN 978-0-425-16689-5. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Carter, Howard; Mace, A. C. (1923). The Tomb of Tutankhamen Volume I. London: Cassell and Company. Retrieved 26 August 2022.
• Carter, Howard (1925). "4th Season Exacavation Journal: 28 Oct. 1925". Tutankhamun: Anatomy of an Excavation. The Griffith Institute. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
• Carter, Howard (1925b). "4th Season Exacavation Journal: 29 Oct. 1925". Tutankhamun: Anatomy of an Excavation. The Griffith Institute. Retrieved 18 August 2022.
• Carter, Howard (1926). "5th Season Excavation Journal: 23 Oct. 1926". Tutankhamun: Anatomy of an Excavation. The Griffith Institute. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
• Carter, Howard (1927). The Tomb of Tutankhamen Volume II. London: Cassell and Company. Retrieved 14 May 2022.
• Carter, Howard; Mace, A. C. (1977). The Discovery of the Tomb of Tutankhamen. New York: Dover Publications. ISBN 978-0-486-23500-4. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Comelli, Daniela; D'orazio, Massimo; Folco, Luigi; El-Halwagy, Mahmud; Frizzi, Tommaso; Alberti, Roberto; Capogrosso, Valentina; Elnaggar, Abdelrazek; Hassan, Hala; Nevin, Austin; Porcelli, Franco; Rashed, Mohamed G.; Valentini, Gianluca (July 2016). "The meteoritic origin of Tutankhamun's iron dagger blade". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 51 (7): 1301–1309. Bibcode:2016M&PS...51.1301C. doi:10.1111/maps.12664. hdl:11568/794614. S2CID 36279444. Retrieved 8 October 2022.
• Derry, Douglas (1927). "Appendix I: Report Upon The Examination Of Tut-Ankh-Amen's Mummy". The Tomb of Tutankhamen Volume II. By Carter, Howard. London: Cassell and Company. pp. 143–161. Retrieved 14 May 2022.
• Doherty, Paul (2002). The Mysterious Death of Tutankhamun. New York: Carroll & Graf. ISBN 978-0-7867-1075-1. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Eaton-Krauss, Marianne (2001). "Tutankhamun". In Redford, Donald B. (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 452–453. ISBN 9780195187656. Retrieved 29 July 2023.
• Eaton-Krauss, Marianne (2016). The Unknown Tutankhamun. New York: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-47257-561-6.
• El Mahdy, Christine (1999). Tutankhamen : the life and death of a boy-king. New York: St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-26241-9. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Forbes, Dennis; Ikram, Salima; Kamrin, Janice (2007). "Tutankhamen's Missing Ribs". KMT. 18 (1): 51–56. Retrieved 22 August 2022.
• Gabolde, Marc (2016). "An Egyptian Gold Necklace for Sale" (PDF). HAL. Retrieved 31 August 2022.
• Gamble, James G. (23 June 2010). "King Tutankhamun's Family and Demise". JAMA. 303 (24): 2472, author reply 2473–5. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.820. PMID 20571009.
• Gilbert, Katherine Stoddert; Holt, Joan K.; Hudson, Sara, eds. (1976). Treasures of Tutankhamun. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. ISBN 0-87099-156-6.
• Harrison, R. G.; Abdalla, A. B. (March 1972). "The remains of Tutankhamun". Antiquity. 46 (181): 8–14. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00053072. S2CID 162450016.
• Harrison, R. G.; Connolly, R. C.; Abdalla, A. (October 1969). "Kinship of Smenkhkare and Tutankhamen Demonstrated Serologically". Nature. 224 (5217): 325–326. doi:10.1038/224325b0. PMID 4898924. S2CID 4206015.
• Hawass, Z.; Shafik, M.; Rühli, F. J.; Selim, A.; El-Sheikh, E.; Abdel Fatah, S.; Amer, H.; Gaballa, F.; Gamal Eldin, A.; Egarter-Vigl, E.; Gostner, P. (2007). "Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Pharaoh Tutankhamun, ca. 1300 BC". Annales du Service des Antiquités de l'Égypte. 81: 159–174.
• Hawass, Zahi; Gad, Yehia Z.; Ismail, Somaia; Khairat, Rabab; Fathalla, Dina; Hasan, Naglaa; Ahmed, Amal; Elleithy, Hisham; Ball, Markus; Gaballah, Fawzi; Wasef, Sally; Fateen, Mohamed; Amer, Hany; Gostner, Paul; Selim, Ashraf; Zink, Albert; Pusch, Carsten M. (17 February 2010). "Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun's Family". JAMA. 303 (7): 638–647. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.121. ISSN 0098-7484. PMID 20159872. Retrieved 2 August 2022.
• Hawass, Zahi; Saleem, Sahar (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0. OCLC 1078493215.
• Ikram, Salima (2013). "Some Thoughts on the Mummification of King Tutankhamun" (PDF). Études et Travaux (Institut des Cultures Méditerranéennes et Orientales de l'Académie Polonaise des Sciences). XXVI: 291–301. Retrieved 8 May 2020.
• Ikram, Salima (2021). "An Epistolary Footnote: Howard Carter, Saleh Hamdi Bey, and Tutankhamun's Mummy". In Ullmann, Martina; Pieke, Gabriele; Hoffmann, Friedhelm; Bayer, Christian (eds.). Up and down the Nile : ägyptologische Studien für Regine Schulz. Münster. pp. 205–208. ISBN 978-3-96327-084-0. Retrieved 15 December 2022.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
• Ikram, Salima (2022). "The Most Famous Mummy of All is Nebkheperure Tutankhamen's". KMT: A Modern Journal of Ancient Egypt. 33 (2): 10–21.
• James, T. G. H. (2000). Howard Carter: The Path to Tutankhamun, Second Edition. I. B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-86064-615-7. Retrieved 16 December 2022.
• James, T.G.H. (2001). "Carter, Howard". In Redford, Donald B. (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt (2005 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195187656.
• Johnson, W. Raymond (2015). "A Royal Fishing and Fowling Talatat Scene from Amarna" (PDF). The Akhetaten Sun. 21 (2): 14–24. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
• King, Michael R.; Cooper, Gregory M.; DeNevi, Don (2006). Who Killed King Tut? : using modern forensics to solve a 3,300-year-old mystery : with new data on the Egyptian CT scan. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. ISBN 978-1-59102-401-9. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Leek, F. Filce (1972). The Human Remains From The Tomb of Tut'ankhamun. Oxford: Griffith Institute.
• Mace, Arthur C. (1975). "Work at the Tomb of Tutankhamun". The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin. 33 (2): 96–108. doi:10.2307/3258745. JSTOR 3258745. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Marchant, Jo (25 June 2010). "Tutankhamen 'killed by sickle-cell disease'". New Scientist. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
• Marchant, Jo (2011). "Ancient DNA: Curse of the Pharaoh's DNA". Nature. 472 (7344): 404–406. Bibcode:2011Natur.472..404M. doi:10.1038/472404a. PMID 21525906.
• Markel, H. (17 February 2010). "King Tutankhamun, modern medical science, and the expanding boundaries of historical inquiry". JAMA. 303 (7): 667–668. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.153. PMID 20159878.
• McCarthy, Michael (5 October 2007). . The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 5 November 2007.
• Patterson, James; Dugard, Martin (2009). The Murder of King Tut : the plot to kill the child king : a nonfiction thriller (2010 ed.). New York: Little, Brown and Co. ISBN 978-0-316-03404-3. Retrieved 5 August 2022.
• Paulshock, Bernadine Z. (11 July 1980). "Tutankhamun and His Brothers". JAMA. 244 (2): 160–164. doi:10.1001/jama.1980.03310020036024.
• Reeves, Nicholas (1990). The Complete Tutankhamun : The King, The Tomb, The Royal Treasure (2007 ed.). London: Thames and Hudson. ISBN 0500278105. Retrieved 18 July 2022.
• Rühli, F.J.; Ikram, S. (2013). "Purported medical diagnoses of Pharaoh Tutankhamun, c. 1325 BC-". HOMO. 65 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1016/j.jchb.2013.08.006. PMID 24616928. Retrieved 17 December 2022.
• Timmann, Christian; Meyer, Christian G. (23 June 2010). "King Tutankhamun's Family and Demise". JAMA. 303 (24): 2473, author reply 2473–5. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.822. PMID 20571010.
• Walshe, J.M. (January 1973). "Tutankhamun: Klinefelter's Or Wilson's?". The Lancet. 301 (7794): 109–110. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(73)90516-3. PMID 4118642.
• Williams, A. R. (2005). "Modern Technology Reopens the Ancient Case of King Tut". National Geographic. 207 (6): 2–21.

Further reading

• Marchant, Jo (2013). The Shadow King: The Bizarre Afterlife of King Tut's Mummy. Boston, Massachusetts: Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0306821332.

External links

•   Media related to Tutankhamun's mummy at Wikimedia Commons
• Howard Carter's diaries at the Griffith Institute