fbpx
Wikipedia

Tipsy Coachman

The Tipsy Coachman doctrine is a rule of law that upholds in a higher court a correct conclusion, despite flawed reasoning by the judge in a lower court. In other words, the lower judgment was right but for the wrong reason.

The colorful "tipsy coachman" label comes from a 19th-century Georgia case, Lee v. Porter, 63 Ga 345, 346 (1879), in which the Georgia Supreme Court, noting that the "human mind is so constituted that in many instances it finds the truth when wholly unable to find the way that leads to it", quoted from Oliver Goldsmith's Retaliation: A Poem written in 1774:

Here, waiter, more wine, let me sit while I'm able,
'Till all my companions sink under the table;
Then, with chaos and blunders encircling my head,
Let me ponder, and tell what I think of the dead.
...

Here lies honest William, whose heart was a mint,
While the owner ne'er knew half the good that was in't;
The pupil of impulse, it forced him along,
His conduct still right, with his argument wrong;
Still aiming at honour, yet fearing to roam,
The coachman was tipsy, the chariot drove home;
Would you ask for his merits, alas! he had none,
What was good was spontaneous, his faults were his own.

The Florida Supreme Court explained the doctrine in a 2002 appeal from a second-degree murder conviction:

We start with the proposition that generally, if a claim is not raised in the [trial] court, it will not be considered on appeal. However, notwithstanding this principle, in some circumstances, even though a trial court's ruling is based on improper reasoning, the ruling will be upheld if there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling.

This longstanding principle of appellate law, sometimes referred to as the 'tipsy coachman' doctrine, allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that reaches the right result but for the wrong reasons so long as there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record.

— Robertson v. State, 829 So. 2d 901, 906 (Fla. 2002) (internal citations and punctuation omitted)

External links edit

tipsy, coachman, doctrine, rule, that, upholds, higher, court, correct, conclusion, despite, flawed, reasoning, judge, lower, court, other, words, lower, judgment, right, wrong, reason, colorful, tipsy, coachman, label, comes, from, 19th, century, georgia, cas. The Tipsy Coachman doctrine is a rule of law that upholds in a higher court a correct conclusion despite flawed reasoning by the judge in a lower court In other words the lower judgment was right but for the wrong reason The colorful tipsy coachman label comes from a 19th century Georgia case Lee v Porter 63 Ga 345 346 1879 in which the Georgia Supreme Court noting that the human mind is so constituted that in many instances it finds the truth when wholly unable to find the way that leads to it quoted from Oliver Goldsmith s Retaliation A Poem written in 1774 Here waiter more wine let me sit while I m able Till all my companions sink under the table Then with chaos and blunders encircling my head Let me ponder and tell what I think of the dead Here lies honest William whose heart was a mint While the owner ne er knew half the good that was in t The pupil of impulse it forced him along His conduct still right with his argument wrong Still aiming at honour yet fearing to roam The coachman was tipsy the chariot drove home Would you ask for his merits alas he had none What was good was spontaneous his faults were his own The Florida Supreme Court explained the doctrine in a 2002 appeal from a second degree murder conviction We start with the proposition that generally if a claim is not raised in the trial court it will not be considered on appeal However notwithstanding this principle in some circumstances even though a trial court s ruling is based on improper reasoning the ruling will be upheld if there is any theory or principle of law in the record which would support the ruling This longstanding principle of appellate law sometimes referred to as the tipsy coachman doctrine allows an appellate court to affirm a trial court that reaches the right result but for the wrong reasons so long as there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record Robertson v State 829 So 2d 901 906 Fla 2002 internal citations and punctuation omitted External links editAn exhaustive article addressing the applicability of the principle can be found in The Florida Bar Journal at http www floridabar org DIVCOM JN JNJournal01 nsf c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a 31a5fce82d401c5e8525739f004c7f9e OpenDocument In yet another article in The Florida Bar Journal the efficacy of the principle is questioned at http www floridabar org DIVCOM JN JNJournal01 nsf c0d731e03de9828d852574580042ae7a c0109640122fbcde852573050052d2ed OpenDocument Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Tipsy Coachman amp oldid 1217384197, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.