Geri Halliwell's departure from British girl group the Spice Girls on 27 May 1998 was the subject of a lawsuit by Aprilia World Service B.V. (AWS), a manufacturer of motorcycles and scooters. On 9 March 1998, Halliwell informed the other members of the Spice Girls of her intention to withdraw from the group, yet the group signed an agreement with AWS on 24 March and again on 30 April, and participated in a commercial photo shoot on 4 May in Milan, eventually concluding a contract with AWS on 6 May 1998. The Court of Appeal of England and Wales held that their conduct constituted a misrepresentation by giving the impression that Halliwell intended to remain part of the group in the foreseeable future, allowing AWS to rescind their contract with the Spice Girls.[1][2]
See alsoedit
Referencesedit
^ abSpice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BV [2002] EWCA Civ 15; [2002] EMLR 27 CA.
^ abMcKendrick, Ewan (2010). "Chapter 17: Misrepresentation". Contract Law – Text, Cases, Materials, 4th edition. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 588–592. ISBN978-0-19-957979-2.
This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
spice, girls, aprilia, world, service, 2002, ewca, leading, english, contract, case, concerning, misrepresentation, conduct, courtcourt, appealdecided24, january, 2002citation, 2002, ewca, 15transcript, keywordsmisrepresentation, geri, halliwell, departure, fr. Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BV 2002 EWCA Civ 15 is the leading English contract law case concerning misrepresentation by conduct 1 2 Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BVCourtCourt of AppealDecided24 January 2002Citation s 2002 EWCA Civ 15Transcript s 1 KeywordsMisrepresentation Geri Halliwell s departure from British girl group the Spice Girls on 27 May 1998 was the subject of a lawsuit by Aprilia World Service B V AWS a manufacturer of motorcycles and scooters On 9 March 1998 Halliwell informed the other members of the Spice Girls of her intention to withdraw from the group yet the group signed an agreement with AWS on 24 March and again on 30 April and participated in a commercial photo shoot on 4 May in Milan eventually concluding a contract with AWS on 6 May 1998 The Court of Appeal of England and Wales held that their conduct constituted a misrepresentation by giving the impression that Halliwell intended to remain part of the group in the foreseeable future allowing AWS to rescind their contract with the Spice Girls 1 2 See also editReferences edit a b Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BV 2002 EWCA Civ 15 2002 EMLR 27 CA a b McKendrick Ewan 2010 Chapter 17 Misrepresentation Contract Law Text Cases Materials 4th edition Oxford New York Oxford University Press pp 588 592 ISBN 978 0 19 957979 2 nbsp This case law article is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Spice Girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service BV amp oldid 1148246175, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
