fbpx
Wikipedia

Smythe's Megalith

Smythe's Megalith, also known as the Warren Farm Chamber, was a chambered long barrow east of Blue Bell Hill, north of Maidstone, in the south-eastern English county of Kent, close to Aylesford village and the hamlet of Sandling.

Smythe's Megalith
Clement Smythe's 1822 sketch of the chamber at Smythe's Megalith. It was destroyed the same day it was discovered.
Location within Kent
Coordinates51°19′N 0°31′E / 51.317°N 0.517°E / 51.317; 0.517 (approx.)
TypeLong barrow

Probably constructed in the 4th millennium BCE, during Britain's Early Neolithic period, it was discovered in 1822, at which point it was dismantled. Built out of earth and at least five local sarsen megaliths, the long barrow consisted of a roughly rectangular earthen tumulus with a stone chamber in its eastern end. Human remains were deposited into this chamber.

Archaeologists have established that the monument was built by pastoralist communities shortly after the introduction of agriculture to Britain from continental Europe. Although representing part of an architectural tradition of long barrow building widespread across Neolithic Europe, Smythe's Megalith belonged to a localised regional variant produced in the vicinity of the River Medway, now known as the Medway Megaliths.

Several of the Medway Megaliths still survive: Coldrum Long Barrow, Addington Long Barrow, and Chestnuts Long Barrow are on the river's western side, while Kit's Coty House, the Little Kit's Coty House, and the Coffin Stone are on the eastern side nearer to Smythe's Megalith. Close to the site of the lost monument is the White Horse Stone, a standing stone that may have once been part of another chambered long barrow.

The site may have been ransacked during the Middle Ages, as other Medway Megaliths were. By the early 19th century it was buried beneath soil, largely due to millennia of hillwash coming down from the adjacent Blue Bell Hill. In 1822, it was discovered by farm labourers ploughing the land; the local antiquarians Clement Smythe and Thomas Charles were called in to examine it. Shortly after, the labourers pulled away the stones and dispersed most of the human remains, destroying the monument. Smythe and Charles produced, but did not publish, reports on their findings, and these have been discussed by archaeologists since the mid-20th century.

Location edit

Smythe's Megalith was located on the south-facing combe of Blue Bell Hill, within the vicinity of Warren Farm, near the village of Aylesford in the south-eastern English county of Kent.[1] The location where it was found lies in a large field now to the east of the A229 dual carriageway.[2] Nothing of the monument can now be seen and the specific location cannot be publicly accessed.[2]

Context edit

The Early Neolithic was a revolutionary period of British history. Between 4500 and 3800 BCE, it saw a widespread change in lifestyle as the communities living in the British Isles adopted agriculture as their primary form of subsistence, abandoning the hunter-gatherer lifestyle that had characterised the preceding Mesolithic period.[3] This came about through contact with continental European societies, although it is unclear to what extent this can be attributed to an influx of migrants or to indigenous Mesolithic Britons adopting agricultural technologies from the continent.[4] The region of modern Kent would have been key for the arrival of continental European settlers and visitors, because of its position on the estuary of the River Thames and its proximity to the continent.[5]

Britain was then largely forested;[6] widespread forest clearance did not occur in Kent until the Late Bronze Age (c.1000 to 700 BCE).[7] Environmental data from the vicinity of the White Horse Stone, a putatively prehistoric monolith near the River Medway, supports the idea that the area was still largely forested in the Early Neolithic, covered by a woodland of oak, ash, hazel/alder and amygdaloideae.[8] Throughout most of Britain, there is little evidence of cereal or permanent dwellings from this period, leading archaeologists to believe that the island's Early Neolithic economy was largely pastoral, relying on herding cattle, with people living a nomadic or semi-nomadic life.[9]

Medway Megaliths edit

 
The construction of long barrows and related funerary monuments took place in various parts of Europe during the Early Neolithic (known distribution pictured)

Across Western Europe, the Early Neolithic marks the first period in which humans built monumental structures in the landscape.[10] These constructs include chambered long barrows, rectangular or oval earthen tumuli which had a chamber built into one end. Some of these chambers were constructed from timber, although others were built using large stones, now known as "megaliths".[11] The long barrows often served as tombs, housing the physical remains of the dead within their chamber.[12] Individuals were rarely buried alone in the Early Neolithic, instead being interred in collective burials with other members of their community.[13] These chambered tombs were built all along the Western European seaboard during the Early Neolithic, from southeastern Spain up to southern Sweden, taking in most of the British Isles;[14] the architectural tradition was introduced to Britain from continental Europe in the first half of the fourth millennium BCE.[15] Although there are stone buildings—like Göbekli Tepe in modern Turkey—which predate them, the chambered long barrows constitute humanity's first widespread tradition of construction using stone.[16]

Although now all ruined and not retaining their original appearance,[17] at the time of construction the Medway Megaliths would have been some of the largest and most visually imposing Early Neolithic funerary monuments in Britain.[18] Grouped along the River Medway as it cuts through the North Downs,[19] they constitute the most southeasterly group of megalithic monuments in the British Isles,[20] and the only megalithic group in eastern England.[21] The archaeologists Brian Philp and Mike Dutto deemed the Medway Megaliths to be "some of the most interesting and well known" archaeological sites in Kent,[22] while the archaeologist Paul Ashbee described them as "the most grandiose and impressive structures of their kind in southern England".[23]

The megaliths can be divided into two separate clusters: one to the west of the River Medway and the other on Blue Bell Hill to the east, with a distance between the two clusters of between 8 and 10 kilometres (5 and 6 miles).[24] The western group includes Coldrum Long Barrow, Addington Long Barrow, and the Chestnuts Long Barrow.[25] The eastern group consists of Smythe's Megalith, Kit's Coty House, Little Kit's Coty House, the Coffin Stone, and several other stones which might have once been parts of chambered tombs, most notably the White Horse Stone.[26] It is not known if they were all built at the same time, or whether they were constructed in succession,[27] while similarly it is not known if they each served the same function or whether there was a hierarchy in their usage.[28]

 
Map of the Medway Megaliths around the River Medway

The Medway long barrows all conformed to the same general design plan,[29] and all aligned on an east to west axis.[29] Each had a stone chamber at the eastern end of the mound, and they each probably had a stone facade flanking the entrance.[29] The chambers were constructed from sarsen, a dense, hard, and durable stone that occurs naturally throughout Kent, having formed out of silicified sand from the Eocene epoch. Early Neolithic builders would have selected blocks from the local area, and then transported them to the site of the monument to be erected.[30]

These common architectural features among the Medway Megaliths indicate a strong regional cohesion with no direct parallels elsewhere in the British Isles.[31] For instance, they would have been taller than most other chambered long barrows in Britain, with internal heights of up to 3.8 metres (10 feet).[32] Nevertheless, as with other regional groupings of Early Neolithic long barrows—like the Cotswold-Severn group in south-western Britain—there are also various idiosyncrasies in the different monuments, such as Coldrum's rectilinear shape, the Chestnut Long Barrow's facade, and the long, thin mounds at Addington and Kit's Coty.[33] These variations might have been caused by the monuments being altered over the course of their use.[34]

The builders were probably influenced by pre-existing tomb-shrines.[35] It is not known if these people had grown up locally, or moved into the Medway area from elsewhere.[35] Based on a stylistic analysis of their architectural designs, the archaeologist Stuart Piggott thought that the plan behind the Medway Megaliths had originated in the area around the Low Countries;[36] conversely, Glyn Daniel thought their design derived from Scandinavia,[37] John H. Evans thought Germany,[38] and Ronald F. Jessup suggested an influence from the Cotswold-Severn group.[39] Ashbee noted that their close clustering in the same area was reminiscent of the megalithic tomb-shrine traditions of continental Northern Europe,[23] and emphasised that the megaliths were a regional manifestation of a tradition widespread across Early Neolithic Europe.[40] He nevertheless stressed that a precise place of origin was "impossible to indicate" with the available evidence.[41]

Design edit

 
One of Clement Smythe's two illustrations of the monument

The part of the chambered long barrow that was discovered was a stone chamber composed of four large stones.[2] The stones used were sarsens.[42] The northern stone measured 2.3 metres (7 ft 6 in) by 1.4 metres (4 ft 9 in) by 0.36 metres (1 ft 2 in).[43] The southern stone measured 2.1 metres (7 ft) by 1.8 metres (5 ft 9 in) by 0.69 metres (2 ft 3 in).[43] The third stone, on the western side, measured 0.91 metres (3 ft) by 1.2 metres (4 ft) by 0.46 metres (1 ft 6 in).[43] A fourth, smaller stone, measuring 0.91 metres (3 ft) by 0.61 metres (2 ft) by 0.30 metres (1 ft), was placed to prevent the north stone falling onto its southern counterpart.[44] This may have once been used to divide the chamber in two.[45] Given the recorded dimensions of the stones, Ashbee suggested that the chamber may have once measured 6.1 metres (20 ft) in length and could have included as many as ten sarsen stones in its original construction.[45] He also suggested that it would have had a height of around 1.2 metres (4 ft), making it one of the smaller chambers in the Medway region; the chamber at Kits Cot House, for instance, reached over 1.8 metres (6 ft) in height, and that at Chestnuts Long Barrow reached a height of about 2.7 metres (9 ft).[46]

Below these megaliths was a flat stone, measuring 1.2 metres (4 ft) in length and 0.91 metres (3 ft) in width.[43] Lying atop this stone were human remains, reportedly aligned in an east to west orientation.[43] Ashbee noted that such paving stones are rare in recorded chambered tombs, and suggested that it might instead have once been a cover stone that sat atop the chamber, but which had been knocked down at some point in the monument's history. In this scenario, the bones found atop it would have to have been disturbed from their original position.[45] Also on the flat stone, near to the human remains, was the skull of a mole.[47] A small sherd of unglazed pottery was also found with the bones.[43] This need not have dated from the original period of the site's construction; as found at other, better-recorded sites, chambered long barrows could remain open for centuries or millennia after they were built, during which time other material was placed inside.[48] For instance, small sherds of Beaker pottery, dating from the Late Neolithic, were found at Kit's Coty House, and the sherd found at Smythe's Megalith might also date from this period.[48]

 
The Smythe's Megalith chamber may have looked like the surviving (and reconstructed) example at Coldrum Long Barrow (pictured)

At the time of the site's discovery, there was no apparent barrow, in part because the ground level of the area had been raised by millennia of hillwash coming down from further up Blue Bell Hill.[49] However, as a result of what is known of this architectural style from better-recorded sites, it is apparent that this stone chamber would have been located at the eastern end of a long earthen barrow.[45] Ashbee noted that this could have reached a length of 55 metres (180 feet).[45] It may be that kerbstones also lined the sides of this barrow, as is evident at several other of the Medway Megaliths; Ashbee suggested that this could have contained as many as 110 or 120 sarsen stones.[45] The monument may have had ditches flanking its sides, and chalk rubble collected in digging these ditches may have been piled up to help form the barrow.[50]

During the Early Neolithic, the site may have been close to other chambered long barrows; the White Horse Stone, for instance, is nearby and may have once been part of the chamber of a long barrow.[51] Various sarsen stones have been found in the vicinity of both, again perhaps reflecting the remnants of since-destroyed long barrows.[51] To the south of the White Horse Stone was a building—termed "Structure 4806" by its excavators in the 2000s—that was constructed in the Early Neolithic period.[52] Radiocarbon dating from the site suggests a usage date of between 4110-3820 and 3780-3530 calibrated BCE.[53] 18 metres (59 ft) long and 8 metres (26 ft) wide, it was a longhouse of a type known from across various parts of Europe.[54] If it had been a domestic residence, its size would mean that it was only "occupied by a small number of occupants, probably no more than a small family group".[55] A smaller, circular building approximately 3.75 metres (12 ft) in diameter was present just to the south-east of the longhouse;[56] there was little dating evidence for this, but what existed suggested a Late Neolithic origin.[57] The archaeologists who excavated these buildings suggested that they might have been "houses of the living" that were intervisible with the "houses of the dead", including Smythe's Megalith. Alternately, they suggested that the longhouse was "part of the funerary tradition", used in preparing "the remains of the dead or for communal activities such as feasting".[58]

Human remains edit

Analysis of the bones found in the chamber took place in the 1820s. At the time, it was noted that most of the bones were broken into small pieces—something the examiner believed had been caused by the workmen who recovered them—but that they included pieces of skull, ribs, thigh, leg, and arm bones.[44] There were two right sides of mandibles and two portions of ulnae including the olecranon, indicating that the remains of at least two individuals were present in the chamber.[47] Analysis of the recovered teeth showed that the molars were worn down and flattened, indicating that the deceased had been of middle age.[47]

Later history edit

 
Smythe's Megalith was found on the lower slope of Blue Bell Hill.

Around 200 metres (660 ft) away from the Neolithic houses, a settlement was established on a spur of higher ground during the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age. This included several round houses and deep pits cut into the underlying chalk. These pits were perhaps originally used for corn storage, although were later infilled with ceramics, iron objects, animal bone, and two human burials.[59] The archaeologists who investigated the site believed that this material was not just domestic refuse but had been deposited with greater meaning as part of a ritualistic act.[60]

Ashbee suggested that the chambered long barrow may have remained visible into the Middle Ages, and at this point may have been damaged by individuals digging into it.[61] In support of this idea, he highlighted that the archaeological excavation of Chestnuts Long Barrow had confirmed that that long barrow had been deliberately damaged in the 12th or 13th century.[62] Similar claims of medieval destruction have also been made for Lower Kit's Coty House,[63] Kit's Coty House, Coldrum Long Barrow, and Addington Long Barrow.[64] Ashbee suggested that this destruction was probably due to iconoclasm, believing that the burial of the stones likely indicated that medieval Christian zealots had tried to deliberately destroy and defame the pre-Christian monument.[65]

Conversely, the archaeologist John Alexander believed that this damage resulted from a robbery by medieval treasure hunters.[66] Supporting this idea is comparative evidence, with the Close Roll of 1237 ordering the opening of barrows on the Isle of Wight in search for treasure, a practice that may have spread to Kent around the same time.[64] Alexander believed that the destruction may have been brought about by a special commissioner, highlighting that the "expertness and thoroughness of the robbery"—as evidenced at Chestnuts—would have necessitated resources beyond that which a local community could likely produce.[64]

Discovery and investigation edit

In 1822,[a] workmen were ploughing in a field at Warren Farm when they found that their ploughs were repeatedly striking stones beneath the surface. Removing the topsoil, they discovered three large stones several inches below. The farm's owner, George Fowle of Cobtree Manor, called in two men from Maidstone to inspect the monument: the antiquarian and historian Clement Taylor Smythe, and Thomas Charles, a doctor who lived in Maidstone and who had founded a museum at Chillington House.[69] With Smythe present, the workmen removed the soil around the three stones, also revealing a smaller stone as part of the construct. As it was revealed, Smythe became aware of its similarity to the nearby Kit's Coty House.[67] The stones were then removed, likely with the assistance of horses, destroying what remained of the monument.[70]

The following day, the workmen returned to the site, where they dug deeper and revealed a flat stone on which the human remains were found; Smythe was not present on this occasion.[67] The workmen threw most of the human remains to the side, but some were collected by Smythe and analysed by Charles.[67]

Reporting edit

 
The field in which Smythe's Megalith was found, photographed in February 2014

A brief article announcing the discovery appeared in the Maidstone Journal on 4 July 1822.[71] The information included in that article was largely repeated in an issue of the Gentleman's Magazine later that year.[71] The latter also featured some brief discussion as to who the deceased individuals in the chamber had been, speculating that it was "some chief slain in the battle fought here between Vortimer, King of Britain, and the Saxons".[72] A second description of the site appeared in Gentleman's Magazine in 1834, written by S. C. Lampreys.[73]

About a year after the discovery, Smythe wrote an account in which he included both a sketch and plan of the chamber.[74] Smythe's original report was not published at the time,[67] but deposited in the archive of Maidstone Museum.[75] In this unpublished document, he referred to the monument as a "British Tomb" or a "Druidical Monument".[76] The document was only published in 1948, in an article written for the Archaeologia Cantiana journal by the archaeologist John H. Evans.[75] Evans noted that "meagre and incomplete as it is", "we must be grateful" for this document "when we remember the unrecorded destruction wrought throughout the centuries upon this interesting and isolated megalithic necropolis".[77]

Alongside Smythe's report, a second brief account was produced and placed in the museum, likely written by Charles and again published in Evans' 1948 article.[78] Ashbee later related that both of the reports written in the 1820s were "brief but valuable" and "in many ways in advance of their age".[79] He noted that the destruction of prehistoric monuments during this "age of agricultural development" would have been quite commonplace and thus these antiquarians' records—written "almost half a century before the emergence of the outlines of present-day prehistory" as a field of scholarly study—were particularly important.[80]

In the 1920s, the archaeologist O. G. S. Crawford accessed the Maidstone Museum archives to determine the probable location of Smythe's Megalith. He then included the site in his 1924 Ordnance Survey guide to archaeological sites in southeastern England.[75] In 1955, several substantial stones were also found in the area.[75] In 2000, Ashbee stated that some of the kerbstones had "recently come to light, buried in the ditches" of the monument.[81]

References edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ In his original report, Smythe claimed that the monument was discovered in "the summer of 1823", and this date was copied by Evans in his 1948 publication,[67] and subsequently also by Philp and Dutto.[2] Ashbee later noted that such a date was incorrect, for the monument was discovered in early 1822, after which a report about it appeared in the Maidstone Journal in July.[68]

Footnotes edit

  1. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 1, 8.
  2. ^ a b c d Philp & Dutto 2005, p. 11.
  3. ^ Hutton 1991, pp. 16–17.
  4. ^ Hutton 1991, p. 16; Ashbee 1999, p. 272; Hutton 2013, pp. 34–35.
  5. ^ Holgate 1981, pp. 230–231.
  6. ^ Hutton 2013, p. 37.
  7. ^ Barclay et al. 2006, p. 20.
  8. ^ Barclay et al. 2006, pp. 25–26.
  9. ^ Champion 2007, pp. 73–74; Hutton 2013, p. 33.
  10. ^ Hutton 1991, p. 19; Hutton 2013, p. 37.
  11. ^ Hutton 1991, p. 19; Hutton 2013, p. 40.
  12. ^ Hutton 1991, p. 19.
  13. ^ Malone 2001, p. 103.
  14. ^ Hutton 2013, p. 40.
  15. ^ Malone 2001, pp. 103–104; Hutton 2013, p. 41.
  16. ^ Hutton 2013, p. 41.
  17. ^ Holgate 1981, p. 225; Champion 2007, p. 78.
  18. ^ Champion 2007, p. 76.
  19. ^ Wysocki et al. 2013, p. 1.
  20. ^ Garwood 2012, p. 1.
  21. ^ Holgate 1981, p. 221.
  22. ^ Philp & Dutto 2005, p. 1.
  23. ^ a b Ashbee 1999, p. 269.
  24. ^ Ashbee 1993, pp. 60–61; Champion 2007, p. 78; Wysocki et al. 2013, p. 1.
  25. ^ Ashbee 2005, p. 101; Champion 2007, pp. 76–77.
  26. ^ Ashbee 2005, p. 101; Champion 2007, p. 78.
  27. ^ Holgate 1981, p. 223.
  28. ^ Holgate 1981, pp. 223, 225.
  29. ^ a b c Champion 2007, p. 78.
  30. ^ Ashbee 1993, p. 58; Champion 2007, p. 78.
  31. ^ Holgate 1981, p. 225; Wysocki et al. 2013, p. 3.
  32. ^ Killick 2010, p. 339.
  33. ^ Wysocki et al. 2013, p. 3.
  34. ^ Ashbee 1993, p. 60.
  35. ^ a b Holgate 1981, p. 227.
  36. ^ Piggott 1935, p. 122.
  37. ^ Daniel 1950, p. 161.
  38. ^ Evans 1950, pp. 77−80.
  39. ^ Jessup 1970, p. 111.
  40. ^ Ashbee 1999, p. 271.
  41. ^ Ashbee 1993, p. 57.
  42. ^ Ashbee 2003, p. 7.
  43. ^ a b c d e f Evans 1948, p. 135; Ashbee 2003, p. 6.
  44. ^ a b Evans 1948, pp. 135, 137; Ashbee 2003, p. 6.
  45. ^ a b c d e f Ashbee 2003, p. 10.
  46. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 11–12.
  47. ^ a b c Evans 1948, p. 137; Ashbee 2003, p. 6.
  48. ^ a b Ashbee 2003, p. 11.
  49. ^ Ashbee 1993, p. 86; Ashbee 2005, p. 104.
  50. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 10–11.
  51. ^ a b Ashbee 2005, p. 106.
  52. ^ Barclay et al. 2006, pp. 30–31.
  53. ^ Barclay et al. 2006, p. 46.
  54. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, pp. 450–451.
  55. ^ Barclay et al. 2006, p. 44.
  56. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, p. 451.
  57. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, p. 451; Barclay et al. 2006, pp. 71–72.
  58. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, p. 452.
  59. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, pp. 452–453.
  60. ^ Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000, p. 453.
  61. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 8–10.
  62. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 8–9.
  63. ^ Ashbee 2005, p. 104.
  64. ^ a b c Alexander 1961, p. 25.
  65. ^ Ashbee 1993, pp. 64–65.
  66. ^ Alexander 1961, p. 29.
  67. ^ a b c d e Evans 1948, p. 135.
  68. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 1, 5.
  69. ^ Evans 1948, p. 135; Ashbee 2003, p. 1.
  70. ^ Evans 1948, pp. 135, 138; Ashbee 2003, p. 8.
  71. ^ a b Ashbee 2003, p. 3.
  72. ^ Ashbee 2003, p. 4.
  73. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 3–5.
  74. ^ Evans 1948, p. 137; Ashbee 2003, pp. 1, 3.
  75. ^ a b c d Ashbee 2003, p. 5.
  76. ^ Evans 1948, p. 135; Ashbee 2003, p. 5.
  77. ^ Evans 1948, p. 140.
  78. ^ Evans 1948, p. 137; Ashbee 2003, p. 5.
  79. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 6–7.
  80. ^ Ashbee 2003, pp. 12, 13.
  81. ^ Ashbee 2000, p. 333.

Bibliography edit

  • Alexander, John (1961). "The Excavation of the Chestnuts Megalithic Tomb at Addington, Kent" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 76: 1–57.
  • Ashbee, Paul (1993). "The Medway Megaliths in Perspective" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 111: 57–112.
  • Ashbee, Paul (1999). "The Medway Megaliths in a European Context" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 119: 269–284.
  • Ashbee, Paul (2000). "The Medway's Megalithic Long Barrows" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 120: 319–345.
  • Ashbee, Paul (2003). "The Warren Farm Chamber: A Reconsideration" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 123: 1–15.
  • Ashbee, Paul (2005). Kent in Prehistoric Times. Stroud: Tempus. ISBN 978-0752431369.
  • Barclay, Alistair; Fitzpatrick, Andrew P.; Hayden, Chris; Stafford, Elizabeth (2006). The Prehistoric Landscape at White Horse Stone, Aylesford, Kent (Report). Oxford: Oxford Wessex Archaeology Joint Venture (London and Continental Railways).
  • Champion, Timothy (2007). "Prehistoric Kent". In John H. Williams (ed.). The Archaeology of Kent to AD 800. Woodbridge: Boydell Press and Kent County Council. pp. 67–133. ISBN 9780851155807.
  • Daniel, Glynn E. (1950). The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Evans, John H. (1948). "Smythe's Megalith" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 61: 135–140.
  • Evans, John H. (1950). "Kentish Megalith Types" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 63: 63–81.
  • Garwood, P. (2012). "The Medway Valley Prehistoric Landscapes Project". PAST: The Newsletter of the Prehistoric Society. The Prehistoric Society. 72: 1–3.
  • Holgate, Robin (1981). "The Medway Megaliths and Neolithic Kent" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Kent Archaeological Society. 97: 221–234.
  • Hutton, Ronald (1991). The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles: Their Nature and Legacy. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-17288-8.
  • Hutton, Ronald (2013). Pagan Britain. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-197716.
  • Jessup, Ronald F. (1970). South-East England. London: Thames and Hudson.
  • Killick, Sian (2010). "Neolithic Landscape and Experience: The Medway Megaliths" (PDF). Archaeologia Cantiana. Vol. 130. Kent Archaeological Society. pp. 339–349.
  • Malone, Caroline (2001). Neolithic Britain and Ireland. Stroud: Tempus. ISBN 978-0-7524-1442-3.
  • Oxford Archaeological Unit (2000). "White Horse Stone: A Neolithic Longhouse". Current Archaeology. 168: 450–453.
  • Philp, Brian; Dutto, Mike (2005). The Medway Megaliths (third ed.). Kent: Kent Archaeological Trust.
  • Piggott, Stuart (1935). "A Note on the Relative Chronology of the English Long Barrows". Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 1: 115–126. doi:10.1017/s0079497x00022246.
  • Wysocki, Michael; Griffiths, Seren; Hedges, Robert; Bayliss, Alex; Higham, Tom; Fernandez-Jalvo, Yolanda; Whittle, Alasdair (2013). "Dates, Diet and Dismemberment: Evidence from the Coldrum Megalithic Monument, Kent". Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society. 79: 1–30. doi:10.1017/ppr.2013.10.

External links edit

smythe, megalith, also, known, warren, farm, chamber, chambered, long, barrow, east, blue, bell, hill, north, maidstone, south, eastern, english, county, kent, close, aylesford, village, hamlet, sandling, clement, smythe, 1822, sketch, chamber, destroyed, same. Smythe s Megalith also known as the Warren Farm Chamber was a chambered long barrow east of Blue Bell Hill north of Maidstone in the south eastern English county of Kent close to Aylesford village and the hamlet of Sandling Smythe s MegalithClement Smythe s 1822 sketch of the chamber at Smythe s Megalith It was destroyed the same day it was discovered Location within KentCoordinates51 19 N 0 31 E 51 317 N 0 517 E 51 317 0 517 approx TypeLong barrowProbably constructed in the 4th millennium BCE during Britain s Early Neolithic period it was discovered in 1822 at which point it was dismantled Built out of earth and at least five local sarsen megaliths the long barrow consisted of a roughly rectangular earthen tumulus with a stone chamber in its eastern end Human remains were deposited into this chamber Archaeologists have established that the monument was built by pastoralist communities shortly after the introduction of agriculture to Britain from continental Europe Although representing part of an architectural tradition of long barrow building widespread across Neolithic Europe Smythe s Megalith belonged to a localised regional variant produced in the vicinity of the River Medway now known as the Medway Megaliths Several of the Medway Megaliths still survive Coldrum Long Barrow Addington Long Barrow and Chestnuts Long Barrow are on the river s western side while Kit s Coty House the Little Kit s Coty House and the Coffin Stone are on the eastern side nearer to Smythe s Megalith Close to the site of the lost monument is the White Horse Stone a standing stone that may have once been part of another chambered long barrow The site may have been ransacked during the Middle Ages as other Medway Megaliths were By the early 19th century it was buried beneath soil largely due to millennia of hillwash coming down from the adjacent Blue Bell Hill In 1822 it was discovered by farm labourers ploughing the land the local antiquarians Clement Smythe and Thomas Charles were called in to examine it Shortly after the labourers pulled away the stones and dispersed most of the human remains destroying the monument Smythe and Charles produced but did not publish reports on their findings and these have been discussed by archaeologists since the mid 20th century Contents 1 Location 2 Context 2 1 Medway Megaliths 3 Design 3 1 Human remains 4 Later history 5 Discovery and investigation 5 1 Reporting 6 References 6 1 Notes 6 2 Footnotes 6 3 Bibliography 7 External linksLocation editSmythe s Megalith was located on the south facing combe of Blue Bell Hill within the vicinity of Warren Farm near the village of Aylesford in the south eastern English county of Kent 1 The location where it was found lies in a large field now to the east of the A229 dual carriageway 2 Nothing of the monument can now be seen and the specific location cannot be publicly accessed 2 Context editThe Early Neolithic was a revolutionary period of British history Between 4500 and 3800 BCE it saw a widespread change in lifestyle as the communities living in the British Isles adopted agriculture as their primary form of subsistence abandoning the hunter gatherer lifestyle that had characterised the preceding Mesolithic period 3 This came about through contact with continental European societies although it is unclear to what extent this can be attributed to an influx of migrants or to indigenous Mesolithic Britons adopting agricultural technologies from the continent 4 The region of modern Kent would have been key for the arrival of continental European settlers and visitors because of its position on the estuary of the River Thames and its proximity to the continent 5 Britain was then largely forested 6 widespread forest clearance did not occur in Kent until the Late Bronze Age c 1000 to 700 BCE 7 Environmental data from the vicinity of the White Horse Stone a putatively prehistoric monolith near the River Medway supports the idea that the area was still largely forested in the Early Neolithic covered by a woodland of oak ash hazel alder and amygdaloideae 8 Throughout most of Britain there is little evidence of cereal or permanent dwellings from this period leading archaeologists to believe that the island s Early Neolithic economy was largely pastoral relying on herding cattle with people living a nomadic or semi nomadic life 9 Medway Megaliths edit nbsp The construction of long barrows and related funerary monuments took place in various parts of Europe during the Early Neolithic known distribution pictured Across Western Europe the Early Neolithic marks the first period in which humans built monumental structures in the landscape 10 These constructs include chambered long barrows rectangular or oval earthen tumuli which had a chamber built into one end Some of these chambers were constructed from timber although others were built using large stones now known as megaliths 11 The long barrows often served as tombs housing the physical remains of the dead within their chamber 12 Individuals were rarely buried alone in the Early Neolithic instead being interred in collective burials with other members of their community 13 These chambered tombs were built all along the Western European seaboard during the Early Neolithic from southeastern Spain up to southern Sweden taking in most of the British Isles 14 the architectural tradition was introduced to Britain from continental Europe in the first half of the fourth millennium BCE 15 Although there are stone buildings like Gobekli Tepe in modern Turkey which predate them the chambered long barrows constitute humanity s first widespread tradition of construction using stone 16 Although now all ruined and not retaining their original appearance 17 at the time of construction the Medway Megaliths would have been some of the largest and most visually imposing Early Neolithic funerary monuments in Britain 18 Grouped along the River Medway as it cuts through the North Downs 19 they constitute the most southeasterly group of megalithic monuments in the British Isles 20 and the only megalithic group in eastern England 21 The archaeologists Brian Philp and Mike Dutto deemed the Medway Megaliths to be some of the most interesting and well known archaeological sites in Kent 22 while the archaeologist Paul Ashbee described them as the most grandiose and impressive structures of their kind in southern England 23 The megaliths can be divided into two separate clusters one to the west of the River Medway and the other on Blue Bell Hill to the east with a distance between the two clusters of between 8 and 10 kilometres 5 and 6 miles 24 The western group includes Coldrum Long Barrow Addington Long Barrow and the Chestnuts Long Barrow 25 The eastern group consists of Smythe s Megalith Kit s Coty House Little Kit s Coty House the Coffin Stone and several other stones which might have once been parts of chambered tombs most notably the White Horse Stone 26 It is not known if they were all built at the same time or whether they were constructed in succession 27 while similarly it is not known if they each served the same function or whether there was a hierarchy in their usage 28 nbsp Map of the Medway Megaliths around the River MedwayThe Medway long barrows all conformed to the same general design plan 29 and all aligned on an east to west axis 29 Each had a stone chamber at the eastern end of the mound and they each probably had a stone facade flanking the entrance 29 The chambers were constructed from sarsen a dense hard and durable stone that occurs naturally throughout Kent having formed out of silicified sand from the Eocene epoch Early Neolithic builders would have selected blocks from the local area and then transported them to the site of the monument to be erected 30 These common architectural features among the Medway Megaliths indicate a strong regional cohesion with no direct parallels elsewhere in the British Isles 31 For instance they would have been taller than most other chambered long barrows in Britain with internal heights of up to 3 8 metres 10 feet 32 Nevertheless as with other regional groupings of Early Neolithic long barrows like the Cotswold Severn group in south western Britain there are also various idiosyncrasies in the different monuments such as Coldrum s rectilinear shape the Chestnut Long Barrow s facade and the long thin mounds at Addington and Kit s Coty 33 These variations might have been caused by the monuments being altered over the course of their use 34 The builders were probably influenced by pre existing tomb shrines 35 It is not known if these people had grown up locally or moved into the Medway area from elsewhere 35 Based on a stylistic analysis of their architectural designs the archaeologist Stuart Piggott thought that the plan behind the Medway Megaliths had originated in the area around the Low Countries 36 conversely Glyn Daniel thought their design derived from Scandinavia 37 John H Evans thought Germany 38 and Ronald F Jessup suggested an influence from the Cotswold Severn group 39 Ashbee noted that their close clustering in the same area was reminiscent of the megalithic tomb shrine traditions of continental Northern Europe 23 and emphasised that the megaliths were a regional manifestation of a tradition widespread across Early Neolithic Europe 40 He nevertheless stressed that a precise place of origin was impossible to indicate with the available evidence 41 Design edit nbsp One of Clement Smythe s two illustrations of the monumentThe part of the chambered long barrow that was discovered was a stone chamber composed of four large stones 2 The stones used were sarsens 42 The northern stone measured 2 3 metres 7 ft 6 in by 1 4 metres 4 ft 9 in by 0 36 metres 1 ft 2 in 43 The southern stone measured 2 1 metres 7 ft by 1 8 metres 5 ft 9 in by 0 69 metres 2 ft 3 in 43 The third stone on the western side measured 0 91 metres 3 ft by 1 2 metres 4 ft by 0 46 metres 1 ft 6 in 43 A fourth smaller stone measuring 0 91 metres 3 ft by 0 61 metres 2 ft by 0 30 metres 1 ft was placed to prevent the north stone falling onto its southern counterpart 44 This may have once been used to divide the chamber in two 45 Given the recorded dimensions of the stones Ashbee suggested that the chamber may have once measured 6 1 metres 20 ft in length and could have included as many as ten sarsen stones in its original construction 45 He also suggested that it would have had a height of around 1 2 metres 4 ft making it one of the smaller chambers in the Medway region the chamber at Kits Cot House for instance reached over 1 8 metres 6 ft in height and that at Chestnuts Long Barrow reached a height of about 2 7 metres 9 ft 46 Below these megaliths was a flat stone measuring 1 2 metres 4 ft in length and 0 91 metres 3 ft in width 43 Lying atop this stone were human remains reportedly aligned in an east to west orientation 43 Ashbee noted that such paving stones are rare in recorded chambered tombs and suggested that it might instead have once been a cover stone that sat atop the chamber but which had been knocked down at some point in the monument s history In this scenario the bones found atop it would have to have been disturbed from their original position 45 Also on the flat stone near to the human remains was the skull of a mole 47 A small sherd of unglazed pottery was also found with the bones 43 This need not have dated from the original period of the site s construction as found at other better recorded sites chambered long barrows could remain open for centuries or millennia after they were built during which time other material was placed inside 48 For instance small sherds of Beaker pottery dating from the Late Neolithic were found at Kit s Coty House and the sherd found at Smythe s Megalith might also date from this period 48 nbsp The Smythe s Megalith chamber may have looked like the surviving and reconstructed example at Coldrum Long Barrow pictured At the time of the site s discovery there was no apparent barrow in part because the ground level of the area had been raised by millennia of hillwash coming down from further up Blue Bell Hill 49 However as a result of what is known of this architectural style from better recorded sites it is apparent that this stone chamber would have been located at the eastern end of a long earthen barrow 45 Ashbee noted that this could have reached a length of 55 metres 180 feet 45 It may be that kerbstones also lined the sides of this barrow as is evident at several other of the Medway Megaliths Ashbee suggested that this could have contained as many as 110 or 120 sarsen stones 45 The monument may have had ditches flanking its sides and chalk rubble collected in digging these ditches may have been piled up to help form the barrow 50 During the Early Neolithic the site may have been close to other chambered long barrows the White Horse Stone for instance is nearby and may have once been part of the chamber of a long barrow 51 Various sarsen stones have been found in the vicinity of both again perhaps reflecting the remnants of since destroyed long barrows 51 To the south of the White Horse Stone was a building termed Structure 4806 by its excavators in the 2000s that was constructed in the Early Neolithic period 52 Radiocarbon dating from the site suggests a usage date of between 4110 3820 and 3780 3530 calibrated BCE 53 18 metres 59 ft long and 8 metres 26 ft wide it was a longhouse of a type known from across various parts of Europe 54 If it had been a domestic residence its size would mean that it was only occupied by a small number of occupants probably no more than a small family group 55 A smaller circular building approximately 3 75 metres 12 ft in diameter was present just to the south east of the longhouse 56 there was little dating evidence for this but what existed suggested a Late Neolithic origin 57 The archaeologists who excavated these buildings suggested that they might have been houses of the living that were intervisible with the houses of the dead including Smythe s Megalith Alternately they suggested that the longhouse was part of the funerary tradition used in preparing the remains of the dead or for communal activities such as feasting 58 Human remains edit Analysis of the bones found in the chamber took place in the 1820s At the time it was noted that most of the bones were broken into small pieces something the examiner believed had been caused by the workmen who recovered them but that they included pieces of skull ribs thigh leg and arm bones 44 There were two right sides of mandibles and two portions of ulnae including the olecranon indicating that the remains of at least two individuals were present in the chamber 47 Analysis of the recovered teeth showed that the molars were worn down and flattened indicating that the deceased had been of middle age 47 Later history edit nbsp Smythe s Megalith was found on the lower slope of Blue Bell Hill Around 200 metres 660 ft away from the Neolithic houses a settlement was established on a spur of higher ground during the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age This included several round houses and deep pits cut into the underlying chalk These pits were perhaps originally used for corn storage although were later infilled with ceramics iron objects animal bone and two human burials 59 The archaeologists who investigated the site believed that this material was not just domestic refuse but had been deposited with greater meaning as part of a ritualistic act 60 Ashbee suggested that the chambered long barrow may have remained visible into the Middle Ages and at this point may have been damaged by individuals digging into it 61 In support of this idea he highlighted that the archaeological excavation of Chestnuts Long Barrow had confirmed that that long barrow had been deliberately damaged in the 12th or 13th century 62 Similar claims of medieval destruction have also been made for Lower Kit s Coty House 63 Kit s Coty House Coldrum Long Barrow and Addington Long Barrow 64 Ashbee suggested that this destruction was probably due to iconoclasm believing that the burial of the stones likely indicated that medieval Christian zealots had tried to deliberately destroy and defame the pre Christian monument 65 Conversely the archaeologist John Alexander believed that this damage resulted from a robbery by medieval treasure hunters 66 Supporting this idea is comparative evidence with the Close Roll of 1237 ordering the opening of barrows on the Isle of Wight in search for treasure a practice that may have spread to Kent around the same time 64 Alexander believed that the destruction may have been brought about by a special commissioner highlighting that the expertness and thoroughness of the robbery as evidenced at Chestnuts would have necessitated resources beyond that which a local community could likely produce 64 Discovery and investigation editIn 1822 a workmen were ploughing in a field at Warren Farm when they found that their ploughs were repeatedly striking stones beneath the surface Removing the topsoil they discovered three large stones several inches below The farm s owner George Fowle of Cobtree Manor called in two men from Maidstone to inspect the monument the antiquarian and historian Clement Taylor Smythe and Thomas Charles a doctor who lived in Maidstone and who had founded a museum at Chillington House 69 With Smythe present the workmen removed the soil around the three stones also revealing a smaller stone as part of the construct As it was revealed Smythe became aware of its similarity to the nearby Kit s Coty House 67 The stones were then removed likely with the assistance of horses destroying what remained of the monument 70 The following day the workmen returned to the site where they dug deeper and revealed a flat stone on which the human remains were found Smythe was not present on this occasion 67 The workmen threw most of the human remains to the side but some were collected by Smythe and analysed by Charles 67 Reporting edit nbsp The field in which Smythe s Megalith was found photographed in February 2014A brief article announcing the discovery appeared in the Maidstone Journal on 4 July 1822 71 The information included in that article was largely repeated in an issue of the Gentleman s Magazine later that year 71 The latter also featured some brief discussion as to who the deceased individuals in the chamber had been speculating that it was some chief slain in the battle fought here between Vortimer King of Britain and the Saxons 72 A second description of the site appeared in Gentleman s Magazine in 1834 written by S C Lampreys 73 About a year after the discovery Smythe wrote an account in which he included both a sketch and plan of the chamber 74 Smythe s original report was not published at the time 67 but deposited in the archive of Maidstone Museum 75 In this unpublished document he referred to the monument as a British Tomb or a Druidical Monument 76 The document was only published in 1948 in an article written for the Archaeologia Cantiana journal by the archaeologist John H Evans 75 Evans noted that meagre and incomplete as it is we must be grateful for this document when we remember the unrecorded destruction wrought throughout the centuries upon this interesting and isolated megalithic necropolis 77 Alongside Smythe s report a second brief account was produced and placed in the museum likely written by Charles and again published in Evans 1948 article 78 Ashbee later related that both of the reports written in the 1820s were brief but valuable and in many ways in advance of their age 79 He noted that the destruction of prehistoric monuments during this age of agricultural development would have been quite commonplace and thus these antiquarians records written almost half a century before the emergence of the outlines of present day prehistory as a field of scholarly study were particularly important 80 In the 1920s the archaeologist O G S Crawford accessed the Maidstone Museum archives to determine the probable location of Smythe s Megalith He then included the site in his 1924 Ordnance Survey guide to archaeological sites in southeastern England 75 In 1955 several substantial stones were also found in the area 75 In 2000 Ashbee stated that some of the kerbstones had recently come to light buried in the ditches of the monument 81 References editNotes edit In his original report Smythe claimed that the monument was discovered in the summer of 1823 and this date was copied by Evans in his 1948 publication 67 and subsequently also by Philp and Dutto 2 Ashbee later noted that such a date was incorrect for the monument was discovered in early 1822 after which a report about it appeared in the Maidstone Journal in July 68 Footnotes edit Ashbee 2003 pp 1 8 a b c d Philp amp Dutto 2005 p 11 Hutton 1991 pp 16 17 Hutton 1991 p 16 Ashbee 1999 p 272 Hutton 2013 pp 34 35 Holgate 1981 pp 230 231 Hutton 2013 p 37 Barclay et al 2006 p 20 Barclay et al 2006 pp 25 26 Champion 2007 pp 73 74 Hutton 2013 p 33 Hutton 1991 p 19 Hutton 2013 p 37 Hutton 1991 p 19 Hutton 2013 p 40 Hutton 1991 p 19 Malone 2001 p 103 Hutton 2013 p 40 Malone 2001 pp 103 104 Hutton 2013 p 41 Hutton 2013 p 41 Holgate 1981 p 225 Champion 2007 p 78 Champion 2007 p 76 Wysocki et al 2013 p 1 Garwood 2012 p 1 Holgate 1981 p 221 Philp amp Dutto 2005 p 1 a b Ashbee 1999 p 269 Ashbee 1993 pp 60 61 Champion 2007 p 78 Wysocki et al 2013 p 1 Ashbee 2005 p 101 Champion 2007 pp 76 77 Ashbee 2005 p 101 Champion 2007 p 78 Holgate 1981 p 223 Holgate 1981 pp 223 225 a b c Champion 2007 p 78 Ashbee 1993 p 58 Champion 2007 p 78 Holgate 1981 p 225 Wysocki et al 2013 p 3 Killick 2010 p 339 Wysocki et al 2013 p 3 Ashbee 1993 p 60 a b Holgate 1981 p 227 Piggott 1935 p 122 Daniel 1950 p 161 Evans 1950 pp 77 80 Jessup 1970 p 111 Ashbee 1999 p 271 Ashbee 1993 p 57 Ashbee 2003 p 7 a b c d e f Evans 1948 p 135 Ashbee 2003 p 6 a b Evans 1948 pp 135 137 Ashbee 2003 p 6 a b c d e f Ashbee 2003 p 10 Ashbee 2003 pp 11 12 a b c Evans 1948 p 137 Ashbee 2003 p 6 a b Ashbee 2003 p 11 Ashbee 1993 p 86 Ashbee 2005 p 104 Ashbee 2003 pp 10 11 a b Ashbee 2005 p 106 Barclay et al 2006 pp 30 31 Barclay et al 2006 p 46 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 pp 450 451 Barclay et al 2006 p 44 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 p 451 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 p 451 Barclay et al 2006 pp 71 72 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 p 452 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 pp 452 453 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 p 453 Ashbee 2003 pp 8 10 Ashbee 2003 pp 8 9 Ashbee 2005 p 104 a b c Alexander 1961 p 25 Ashbee 1993 pp 64 65 Alexander 1961 p 29 a b c d e Evans 1948 p 135 Ashbee 2003 pp 1 5 Evans 1948 p 135 Ashbee 2003 p 1 Evans 1948 pp 135 138 Ashbee 2003 p 8 a b Ashbee 2003 p 3 Ashbee 2003 p 4 Ashbee 2003 pp 3 5 Evans 1948 p 137 Ashbee 2003 pp 1 3 a b c d Ashbee 2003 p 5 Evans 1948 p 135 Ashbee 2003 p 5 Evans 1948 p 140 Evans 1948 p 137 Ashbee 2003 p 5 Ashbee 2003 pp 6 7 Ashbee 2003 pp 12 13 Ashbee 2000 p 333 Bibliography edit Alexander John 1961 The Excavation of the Chestnuts Megalithic Tomb at Addington Kent PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 76 1 57 Ashbee Paul 1993 The Medway Megaliths in Perspective PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 111 57 112 Ashbee Paul 1999 The Medway Megaliths in a European Context PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 119 269 284 Ashbee Paul 2000 The Medway s Megalithic Long Barrows PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 120 319 345 Ashbee Paul 2003 The Warren Farm Chamber A Reconsideration PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 123 1 15 Ashbee Paul 2005 Kent in Prehistoric Times Stroud Tempus ISBN 978 0752431369 Barclay Alistair Fitzpatrick Andrew P Hayden Chris Stafford Elizabeth 2006 The Prehistoric Landscape at White Horse Stone Aylesford Kent Report Oxford Oxford Wessex Archaeology Joint Venture London and Continental Railways Champion Timothy 2007 Prehistoric Kent In John H Williams ed The Archaeology of Kent to AD 800 Woodbridge Boydell Press and Kent County Council pp 67 133 ISBN 9780851155807 Daniel Glynn E 1950 The Prehistoric Chamber Tombs of England and Wales Cambridge Cambridge University Press Evans John H 1948 Smythe s Megalith PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 61 135 140 Evans John H 1950 Kentish Megalith Types PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 63 63 81 Garwood P 2012 The Medway Valley Prehistoric Landscapes Project PAST The Newsletter of the Prehistoric Society The Prehistoric Society 72 1 3 Holgate Robin 1981 The Medway Megaliths and Neolithic Kent PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Kent Archaeological Society 97 221 234 Hutton Ronald 1991 The Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles Their Nature and Legacy Oxford and Cambridge Blackwell ISBN 978 0 631 17288 8 Hutton Ronald 2013 Pagan Britain New Haven and London Yale University Press ISBN 978 0 300 197716 Jessup Ronald F 1970 South East England London Thames and Hudson Killick Sian 2010 Neolithic Landscape and Experience The Medway Megaliths PDF Archaeologia Cantiana Vol 130 Kent Archaeological Society pp 339 349 Malone Caroline 2001 Neolithic Britain and Ireland Stroud Tempus ISBN 978 0 7524 1442 3 Oxford Archaeological Unit 2000 White Horse Stone A Neolithic Longhouse Current Archaeology 168 450 453 Philp Brian Dutto Mike 2005 The Medway Megaliths third ed Kent Kent Archaeological Trust Piggott Stuart 1935 A Note on the Relative Chronology of the English Long Barrows Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 1 115 126 doi 10 1017 s0079497x00022246 Wysocki Michael Griffiths Seren Hedges Robert Bayliss Alex Higham Tom Fernandez Jalvo Yolanda Whittle Alasdair 2013 Dates Diet and Dismemberment Evidence from the Coldrum Megalithic Monument Kent Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 79 1 30 doi 10 1017 ppr 2013 10 External links editSmythe s Megalith at The Megalithic Portal Smythe s Megalith at The Modern Antiquarian Smythe s Megalith at Kent County Council website Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Smythe 27s Megalith amp oldid 1187475120, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.