S1909/A2840 is a bill that was passed by the New Jersey Legislature in December 2003, and signed into law by Governor James McGreevey on January 4, 2004, that permits human cloning for the purpose of developing and harvesting human stem cells. Specifically, it legalizes the process of cloning a human embryo, and implanting the clone into a womb, provided that the clone is then aborted and used for medical research. The legislation was sponsored by Senators Richard Codey (D-Essex) and Barbara Buono, and Assembly members Neil M. Cohen (D-Union), John F. McKeon, Mims Hackett (D-Essex), and Joan M. Quigley (D-Hudson). The enactment of this law will enable researchers to find cures for debilitating and deadly diseases.
Supporters of the legislation hailed it as promoting medical progress through science, giving hope for the development of treatments for debilitating diseases such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and diabetes. Assemblyman Neil Cohen lauded it as "not the most significant law we'll write this session—but this century." Paralyzed actor Christopher Reeve, who believed that such legislation may hasten the development of methods to reverse paralysis, testified in support of the bill.
However, Congressmen Chris Smith, Mike Ferguson, and Scott Garrett assailed it, saying, "This legislation will launch New Jersey blindly into the vanguard of terrible human-rights violations and grisly human experimentation." They also claim that, in practice, once a clone is developing in a womb, there is nothing that will prevent it from leading to "the world's first human clone being born and starting a horrible new era of human history." New Jersey's Catholic bishops condemned the newly legalized process as violating "a central tenet of all civilized codes on human experimentation beginning with the Nuremberg Code...[It approves] doing deadly harm to a member of the human species solely for the sake of potential benefit to others."
Related policies around the worldedit
SCNT is currently legal for research purposes in the United Kingdom, having been incorporated into the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in 2001. Permission must be obtained from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in order to perform or attempt SCNT.
In the United States, the practice remains legal, as it has not been addressed by federal law.
In 2005, the United Nations adopted a proposal submitted by Costa Rica, calling on member states to "prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life." This phrase may include SCNT, depending on interpretation.
The Council of Europe's Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and its Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Being appear to ban SCNT. Of the council's 45 member states, the convention has been signed by 31 and ratified by 18. The Additional Protocol has been signed by 29 member nations and ratified by 14.
Cloning: present uses and promises National Institutes of Health, Paper giving background information on cloning in general and SCNT from The Office of Science Policy Analysis
^ Andy Coghlan, "Cloning opponents fear loopholes in new UK law," New Scientist (November 23, 2001, retrieved October 6, 2006)
^ "Chapter 5: Legal and Policy Considerations. Cloning Human Beings" Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, June 1997. Accessed 21 Oct 06
^ United Nations, "General Assembly Adopts United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning By Vote of 84-34-37," press release (August 3, 2005, retrieved October 6, 2006)
^ Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine (April 4, 1997, retrieved October 6, 2006); Council of Europe, Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine, on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Being (January 12, 1998, retrieved October 6, 2006)
January 01, 1970
s1909, a2840, bill, that, passed, jersey, legislature, december, 2003, signed, into, governor, james, mcgreevey, january, 2004, that, permits, human, cloning, purpose, developing, harvesting, human, stem, cells, specifically, legalizes, process, cloning, human. S1909 A2840 is a bill that was passed by the New Jersey Legislature in December 2003 and signed into law by Governor James McGreevey on January 4 2004 that permits human cloning for the purpose of developing and harvesting human stem cells Specifically it legalizes the process of cloning a human embryo and implanting the clone into a womb provided that the clone is then aborted and used for medical research The legislation was sponsored by Senators Richard Codey D Essex and Barbara Buono and Assembly members Neil M Cohen D Union John F McKeon Mims Hackett D Essex and Joan M Quigley D Hudson The enactment of this law will enable researchers to find cures for debilitating and deadly diseases Contents 1 Views regarding the legislation 2 Related policies around the world 3 See also 4 External linksViews regarding the legislation editSupporters of the legislation hailed it as promoting medical progress through science giving hope for the development of treatments for debilitating diseases such as Parkinson s disease Alzheimer s disease cancer and diabetes Assemblyman Neil Cohen lauded it as not the most significant law we ll write this session but this century Paralyzed actor Christopher Reeve who believed that such legislation may hasten the development of methods to reverse paralysis testified in support of the bill However Congressmen Chris Smith Mike Ferguson and Scott Garrett assailed it saying This legislation will launch New Jersey blindly into the vanguard of terrible human rights violations and grisly human experimentation They also claim that in practice once a clone is developing in a womb there is nothing that will prevent it from leading to the world s first human clone being born and starting a horrible new era of human history New Jersey s Catholic bishops condemned the newly legalized process as violating a central tenet of all civilized codes on human experimentation beginning with the Nuremberg Code It approves doing deadly harm to a member of the human species solely for the sake of potential benefit to others Related policies around the world editSCNT is currently legal for research purposes in the United Kingdom having been incorporated into the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act in 2001 Permission must be obtained from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority in order to perform or attempt SCNT In the United States the practice remains legal as it has not been addressed by federal law In 2005 the United Nations adopted a proposal submitted by Costa Rica calling on member states to prohibit all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life This phrase may include SCNT depending on interpretation The Council of Europe s Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and its Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Being appear to ban SCNT Of the council s 45 member states the convention has been signed by 31 and ratified by 18 The Additional Protocol has been signed by 29 member nations and ratified by 14 See also editTherapeutic cloningExternal links editNew Jersey Legislature website State of New Jersey Commission on Science and Technology Stem Cell Research in New Jersey Stem Cell Law Welcomed by Researchers by Laura Mansnerus January 6 2004 The New York Times State of Cloning by Kathryn Jean Lopez January 5 2004 National Review Cloning present uses and promises National Institutes of Health Paper giving background information on cloning in general and SCNT from The Office of Science Policy Analysis Andy Coghlan Cloning opponents fear loopholes in new UK law New Scientist November 23 2001 retrieved October 6 2006 Chapter 5 Legal and Policy Considerations Cloning Human Beings Report and Recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission June 1997 Accessed 21 Oct 06 United Nations General Assembly Adopts United Nations Declaration on Human Cloning By Vote of 84 34 37 press release August 3 2005 retrieved October 6 2006 Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine April 4 1997 retrieved October 6 2006 Council of Europe Additional Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine on the Prohibition of Cloning Human Being January 12 1998 retrieved October 6 2006 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title S1909 A2840 amp oldid 1166185186, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
