The progressive stack is a technique used to give marginalized groups a greater chance to speak.[1] It is sometimes an introduction to, or stepping stone to, consensus decision-making in which simple majorities have less power. The technique works by allowing people to speak on the basis of race, sex, and other group membership, with preference given to members of groups that are considered the most marginalized.
The progressive stack technique attempts to counter what its proponents believe is a flaw in traditional representative democracy, where the majority is heard while the minority or non-dominant groups are silenced or ignored.[1] In practice, "majority culture" may be interpreted by progressive stack practitioners to mean white people, heterosexual people, or men while non-dominant groups include women, people who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer, people of color, and very young or older people.[2][3]
The "stack" in the Occupy movement is the list of speakers who are commenting on proposals or asking questions in public meetings. Anyone can request to be added to the stack. In meetings that don't use the progressive stack, people typically speak in the order they were added to the queue. In meetings that use the progressive stack, people from non-dominant groups are allowed to speak before people from dominant groups, by facilitators, or stack-keepers, urging speakers to "step forward, or step back" based on which racial, age, or gender group they belong to.[4]
Criticismedit
A. Barton Hinkle, a columnist for the Richmond Times-Dispatch, has expressed the opinion that "lining up speakers by race and gender might not seem fair on an individual level", and suggests that proponents of the progressive stack care more about class struggle than individual concerns.[5]
^ abPenny, Laurie (16 October 2011). "Protest by consensus: Laurie Penny on Madrid's Occupy". New Statesman. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
^Mott, Meg (8 November 2011). "Wicca roots". Brattleboro Reformer. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
^Quattrochi, Gina (9 November 2011). . Gay City News. Archived from the original on 9 January 2012. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
^Seltzer, Sarah (29 October 2011). "Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street?". The Nation. Retrieved 11 November 2011.
^Hinkle, A. Barton (4 November 2011). "OWS protesters have strange ideas about fairness". Richmond Times-Dispatch. Retrieved 11 February 2022.
January 01, 1970
progressive, stack, progressive, stack, technique, used, give, marginalized, groups, greater, chance, speak, sometimes, introduction, stepping, stone, consensus, decision, making, which, simple, majorities, have, less, power, technique, works, allowing, people. The progressive stack is a technique used to give marginalized groups a greater chance to speak 1 It is sometimes an introduction to or stepping stone to consensus decision making in which simple majorities have less power The technique works by allowing people to speak on the basis of race sex and other group membership with preference given to members of groups that are considered the most marginalized Contents 1 Overview 2 Criticism 3 See also 4 ReferencesOverview editThe progressive stack technique attempts to counter what its proponents believe is a flaw in traditional representative democracy where the majority is heard while the minority or non dominant groups are silenced or ignored 1 In practice majority culture may be interpreted by progressive stack practitioners to mean white people heterosexual people or men while non dominant groups include women people who are lesbian gay bisexual transgender or queer people of color and very young or older people 2 3 The stack in the Occupy movement is the list of speakers who are commenting on proposals or asking questions in public meetings Anyone can request to be added to the stack In meetings that don t use the progressive stack people typically speak in the order they were added to the queue In meetings that use the progressive stack people from non dominant groups are allowed to speak before people from dominant groups by facilitators or stack keepers urging speakers to step forward or step back based on which racial age or gender group they belong to 4 Criticism editA Barton Hinkle a columnist for the Richmond Times Dispatch has expressed the opinion that lining up speakers by race and gender might not seem fair on an individual level and suggests that proponents of the progressive stack care more about class struggle than individual concerns 5 See also editIntersectionalityReferences edit a b Penny Laurie 16 October 2011 Protest by consensus Laurie Penny on Madrid s Occupy New Statesman Retrieved 11 November 2011 Mott Meg 8 November 2011 Wicca roots Brattleboro Reformer Retrieved 11 November 2011 Quattrochi Gina 9 November 2011 When the System Itself is the Problem Gay City News Archived from the original on 9 January 2012 Retrieved 11 February 2022 Seltzer Sarah 29 October 2011 Where Are the Women at Occupy Wall Street The Nation Retrieved 11 November 2011 Hinkle A Barton 4 November 2011 OWS protesters have strange ideas about fairness Richmond Times Dispatch Retrieved 11 February 2022 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Progressive stack amp oldid 1219146748, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
