The company, Patrick Stevedores applied for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia,[1] which itself was an appeal from a decision by Justice Tony North of the Federal Court upon an application for urgent interlocutory relief which had been brought by the Maritime Union of Australia.[2] The notice of motion seeking the interlocutory orders from North J was filed on 6 April 1998, and the litigation went from that original step to a decision of the High Court within a single month.
The orders made by North J sought to unravel a set of arrangements which had been made within the Patrick group of companies, arrangements which were found to give rise to an arguable case that there had been a conspiracy to injure the MUA members in their employment, contrary to the protections of the Workplace Relations Act 1996. Those orders were upheld on appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2024)
Judgmentedit
The High Court upheld the substance of the orders, but modified them to acknowledge that ultimately it was a question for the administrators of the company whether it resumed trading.
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2024)
^Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [1998] FCA 397, (1998) 77 FCR 478 (23 April 1998), Federal Court (Full Court).
^Maritime Union of Australia v Patrick Stevedores Operations No 1 Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 397, (1998) 77 FCR 456 (21 April 1998), Federal Court.
Referencesedit
Dabscheck, Braham (1 December 1998). "The Waterfront Dispute: Of Vendetta and the Australian Way". The Economic and Labour Relations Review. 9 (2): 155–187. doi:10.1177/103530469800900201. ISSN 1035-3046. S2CID 155022484.
This article related to Australian law is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.
patrick, stevedores, operations, maritime, union, australia, 1998, australian, labour, case, high, court, which, culminated, legal, aspects, 1998, australian, waterfront, dispute, which, major, stevedoring, operation, patrick, group, companies, sought, replace. Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia 1998 HCA 30 is an Australian labour law case in the High Court which culminated the legal aspects of the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute in which a major stevedoring operation the Patrick group of companies sought to replace its largely unionised workforce with a non union workforce Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of AustraliaCourtHigh Court of AustraliaDecided4 May 1998Citation s 1998 HCA 30 1998 195 CLR 1Court membershipJudge s sittingGaudron McHugh Gummow Kirby Hayne amp Callinan JJ Contents 1 Facts 2 Judgment 3 See also 4 Notes 5 ReferencesFacts editThe company Patrick Stevedores applied for special leave to appeal from a decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia 1 which itself was an appeal from a decision by Justice Tony North of the Federal Court upon an application for urgent interlocutory relief which had been brought by the Maritime Union of Australia 2 The notice of motion seeking the interlocutory orders from North J was filed on 6 April 1998 and the litigation went from that original step to a decision of the High Court within a single month The orders made by North J sought to unravel a set of arrangements which had been made within the Patrick group of companies arrangements which were found to give rise to an arguable case that there had been a conspiracy to injure the MUA members in their employment contrary to the protections of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 Those orders were upheld on appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court This section needs expansion You can help by adding to it January 2024 Judgment editThe High Court upheld the substance of the orders but modified them to acknowledge that ultimately it was a question for the administrators of the company whether it resumed trading This section needs expansion You can help by adding to it January 2024 See also editAustralian labour lawNotes edit Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia 1998 FCA 397 1998 77 FCR 478 23 April 1998 Federal Court Full Court Maritime Union of Australia v Patrick Stevedores Operations No 1 Pty Ltd 1998 FCA 397 1998 77 FCR 456 21 April 1998 Federal Court References editDabscheck Braham 1 December 1998 The Waterfront Dispute Of Vendetta and the Australian Way The Economic and Labour Relations Review 9 2 155 187 doi 10 1177 103530469800900201 ISSN 1035 3046 S2CID 155022484 nbsp This article related to Australian law is a stub You can help Wikipedia by expanding it vte Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia amp oldid 1193281008, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
