This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (September 2015)
Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd is a cited case in New Zealand regarding repudiation.[1][2]
Andrew & Gaye Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd & Regency Designer Homes Ltd
Decided
29 March 2001
Transcript(s)
High Court judgment
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting
Nicholson J
Backgroundedit
In 1999, the Oxborough's entered into a contract with a builder to build them a house, with construction to start in March, and to be completed by July.
However, early on in the build, the Oxboroughs complained about some of the workmanship, resulting in the builders in May to start remedial work to the house.
In August, the Oxboroughs informed the builders that they were cancelling the contract, claiming that the builder was repudiating the contract, and demanding that the builder to remove the nearly completed house and to refund all the money they had previously paid the builder.
Heldedit
The evidence did not prove that the builders did not intend to complete the contract.
Referencesedit
^Chetwin, Maree; Graw, Stephen; Tiong, Raymond (2006). An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand (4th ed.). Thomson Brookers. p. 349. ISBN0-86472-555-8.
oxborough, north, harbour, builders, this, article, orphan, other, articles, link, please, introduce, links, this, page, from, related, articles, find, link, tool, suggestions, september, 2015, cited, case, zealand, regarding, repudiation, courthigh, court, ze. This article is an orphan as no other articles link to it Please introduce links to this page from related articles try the Find link tool for suggestions September 2015 Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd is a cited case in New Zealand regarding repudiation 1 2 Oxborough v North Harbour Builders LtdCourtHigh Court of New ZealandFull case nameAndrew amp Gaye Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd amp Regency Designer Homes LtdDecided29 March 2001Transcript s High Court judgmentCourt membershipJudge s sittingNicholson JBackground editIn 1999 the Oxborough s entered into a contract with a builder to build them a house with construction to start in March and to be completed by July However early on in the build the Oxboroughs complained about some of the workmanship resulting in the builders in May to start remedial work to the house In August the Oxboroughs informed the builders that they were cancelling the contract claiming that the builder was repudiating the contract and demanding that the builder to remove the nearly completed house and to refund all the money they had previously paid the builder Held editThe evidence did not prove that the builders did not intend to complete the contract References edit Chetwin Maree Graw Stephen Tiong Raymond 2006 An introduction to the Law of Contract in New Zealand 4th ed Thomson Brookers p 349 ISBN 0 86472 555 8 Walker Campbell 2004 Butterworths Student Companion Contract 4th ed LexisNexis pp 199 200 ISBN 0 408 71770 X Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Oxborough v North Harbour Builders Ltd amp oldid 1084649490, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,
