fbpx
Wikipedia

Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization

The Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization (Hizb al-lamarkaziyya al-idariyya al-'uthmani) was a political party in the Ottoman Empire founded in January 1913. Based in Cairo, the party called for the reform of the Ottoman provincial administration for Arab provinces through decentralization of power and functions, rather than outright independence.

Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization
الحزب العثماني للامركزية الإدارية
PresidentRafiq al-Azm
SecretaryHaqqi al-Azm
FoundedJanuary 1913
HeadquartersCairo
IdeologyArab interests
Decentralization
Arab nationalism
Christian-Muslim Unity

Most support for the party came from Syrian intellectuals and Muslims, though Christians were encouraged to join as well. The party was accused of being political propagandists affiliated with European imperialists.

History and formation Edit

In the wake of the 1908 Young Turk Revolution, the modus vivendi between the Greater Syrian notables and the Ottoman center was disrupted. The power balance between the local notables and the center, which had characterized Sultan Abdul Hamid II's long rule, gave way as supporters of the Committee of Union of Progress (CUP) were given new political privileges and positions at the expense of individuals seen as loyal to the Sultan.[1] Some contemporary Arab commentators remarked that the CUP's Turkification of administration directly contradicted its spoken ideology of Ottomanization.[2] This discontent surfaced immediately following the start of the 1909 countercoup and took on the form of public celebrations as well as planned assassinations of local CUP activists. With the failure of the coup came increased censorship and surveillance of Greater Syria and a flight of many of its intellectuals, either in forced or self-imposed exile, to Paris and Cairo.[3] As a result of this intellectual diaspora and the Khedive's implicit support of press that may destabilize the Ottoman grip on Syrian lands, Cairo emerged as a political and literary hub providing Syrians with freedoms and networks they didn't have before. Following the April 1912 elections, which, one historian recounts, "were arranged so that Unionists [CUP members] won everywhere",[3] disenfranchised Syrian intellectuals realized they could not work within the CUP's political framework and took to creating an organization to advocate decentralization and provincialization.

The resulting product was the Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization (or the Ottoman Decentralization Party). It was founded in Cairo in January 1913. Its initial executive committee was a 14-man panel consisting of 8 Muslims, 5 Christians (Michel Tueni, Josef Hani, Pierre Tarrad, Doctor Eyub Sabit, Khalil Zeine), and 1 Druze (Rizcullah Arcash).[4] Rafiq al-Azm was its President, and, his cousin, Haqqi al-Azm was its Secretary.[5]

Ideology Edit

The party's primary spoken goal was to attain greater administrative decentralization throughout the empire. Despite this, their activism revolved almost exclusively on the Arab lands, and Greater Syria in particular. They adopted Switzerland's governmental model as their ideal, noting its autonomous cantons as an appropriate solution.[6] Rather than agitating for independence, the party sought to remain within the Ottoman Empire, albeit with improved political representation and autonomy. This resembled that of the Liberal Union, who at the time were the main opposition party in the Parliament.[5]

By the end of 1913, it had become clear to the party that the CUP would not willingly accept their demands.[7] In response, some members of the party began to espouse complete Syrian independence.[8] Though the party seems to also have worked towards this end during World War I, seemingly no formal document declares its policy as such.

Membership and reception Edit

By late 1913, the party, in a loose coalition with other Arabist movements, had developed a sophisticated networks of clubs, associations, organizations, and parties spanning the Empire's Arab provinces.[7] Known branches include Beirut, Damascus, Jaffa,[9] and Basra.[10] For fear of repression, the party's membership and chapters were shrouded in secrecy. This is reflected in instructions passed on from the leadership to a prominent Palestinian activist in 1913: "Each branch will remain secret until the government recognizes the party officially".[8]

The party heavily relied on Egyptian-based press to spread its ideology. As such, it appealed more to the educated, influential elite than it did to the masses. Despite this, many local Syrian notables, who were in favor with the CUP, opposed the party while many illiterate Arabs, who absorbed the ideas through local newspaper readings, supported it.[5]

The First World War Edit

With the outbreak of the war, the Ottoman state tightened its grip on Arab lands significantly. The nascent Arab nationalist movement, faced with the decision of supporting the state or agitating for independence, became divided. Party activity decreased as members adopted different projects away from the party.

By 1915, Jamal Pasha had begun to imprison Arab intellectuals he deemed disloyal. In many cases, they were sentenced on the grounds of treason on evidence either in the form of testimony of local notables or documents left in the French consulate in Beirut.[11] This violent censorship culminated in the targeted executions of journalists and political activists on August 21, 1915 and on May 6, 1916 (also known as Martyrs' Day).

See also Edit

  • Al-Fatat, a similar pre-independence group

References Edit

  1. ^ Khoury, Philip S. (2003). Urban Notables and Arab Nationalism: The Politics of Damascus 1860-1920. Cambridge University Press. pp. 52. ISBN 978-0521533232.
  2. ^ Khoury (2003), p.56
  3. ^ a b Khoury (2003), p.62
  4. ^ Memories of A Turkish Statesman 1913-1919 by Djemal Pasha, p. 231
  5. ^ a b c Khoury (2003), p.63
  6. ^ Rogan, Eugene (2015). The Fall of the Ottomans: The Great War in the Middle East. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0465097425.
  7. ^ a b Khalidi, Rashid I (Winter 1981). "The Press as a Source for Modern Arab Political History: 'Abd al-Ghani al-'Uraisi and al-Mufid". Arab Studies Quarterly. 3 (1): 26. JSTOR 41857558.
  8. ^ a b Tauber, Eliezer (Jan 1997). "Secrecy in Early Arab Nationalist Organizations". Middle Eastern Studies. 33 (1): 122. doi:10.1080/00263209708701145. JSTOR 4283850.
  9. ^ Tauber (1997), p.123
  10. ^ Dawn, C. Ernest (Spring 1962). "The Rise of Arabism in Syria". Middle East Journal. 16 (2): 146. JSTOR 4323468.
  11. ^ Bunton, Martin (2016). A History of The Modern Middle East (6th Ed). Westview Press. p. 145. ISBN 978-0-8133-4980-0.

ottoman, party, administrative, decentralization, hizb, lamarkaziyya, idariyya, uthmani, political, party, ottoman, empire, founded, january, 1913, based, cairo, party, called, reform, ottoman, provincial, administration, arab, provinces, through, decentraliza. The Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization Hizb al lamarkaziyya al idariyya al uthmani was a political party in the Ottoman Empire founded in January 1913 Based in Cairo the party called for the reform of the Ottoman provincial administration for Arab provinces through decentralization of power and functions rather than outright independence Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization الحزب العثماني للامركزية الإداريةPresidentRafiq al AzmSecretaryHaqqi al AzmFoundedJanuary 1913HeadquartersCairoIdeologyArab interestsDecentralizationArab nationalismChristian Muslim UnityMost support for the party came from Syrian intellectuals and Muslims though Christians were encouraged to join as well The party was accused of being political propagandists affiliated with European imperialists Contents 1 History and formation 2 Ideology 3 Membership and reception 4 The First World War 5 See also 6 ReferencesHistory and formation EditIn the wake of the 1908 Young Turk Revolution the modus vivendi between the Greater Syrian notables and the Ottoman center was disrupted The power balance between the local notables and the center which had characterized Sultan Abdul Hamid II s long rule gave way as supporters of the Committee of Union of Progress CUP were given new political privileges and positions at the expense of individuals seen as loyal to the Sultan 1 Some contemporary Arab commentators remarked that the CUP s Turkification of administration directly contradicted its spoken ideology of Ottomanization 2 This discontent surfaced immediately following the start of the 1909 countercoup and took on the form of public celebrations as well as planned assassinations of local CUP activists With the failure of the coup came increased censorship and surveillance of Greater Syria and a flight of many of its intellectuals either in forced or self imposed exile to Paris and Cairo 3 As a result of this intellectual diaspora and the Khedive s implicit support of press that may destabilize the Ottoman grip on Syrian lands Cairo emerged as a political and literary hub providing Syrians with freedoms and networks they didn t have before Following the April 1912 elections which one historian recounts were arranged so that Unionists CUP members won everywhere 3 disenfranchised Syrian intellectuals realized they could not work within the CUP s political framework and took to creating an organization to advocate decentralization and provincialization The resulting product was the Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization or the Ottoman Decentralization Party It was founded in Cairo in January 1913 Its initial executive committee was a 14 man panel consisting of 8 Muslims 5 Christians Michel Tueni Josef Hani Pierre Tarrad Doctor Eyub Sabit Khalil Zeine and 1 Druze Rizcullah Arcash 4 Rafiq al Azm was its President and his cousin Haqqi al Azm was its Secretary 5 Ideology EditThe party s primary spoken goal was to attain greater administrative decentralization throughout the empire Despite this their activism revolved almost exclusively on the Arab lands and Greater Syria in particular They adopted Switzerland s governmental model as their ideal noting its autonomous cantons as an appropriate solution 6 Rather than agitating for independence the party sought to remain within the Ottoman Empire albeit with improved political representation and autonomy This resembled that of the Liberal Union who at the time were the main opposition party in the Parliament 5 By the end of 1913 it had become clear to the party that the CUP would not willingly accept their demands 7 In response some members of the party began to espouse complete Syrian independence 8 Though the party seems to also have worked towards this end during World War I seemingly no formal document declares its policy as such Membership and reception EditBy late 1913 the party in a loose coalition with other Arabist movements had developed a sophisticated networks of clubs associations organizations and parties spanning the Empire s Arab provinces 7 Known branches include Beirut Damascus Jaffa 9 and Basra 10 For fear of repression the party s membership and chapters were shrouded in secrecy This is reflected in instructions passed on from the leadership to a prominent Palestinian activist in 1913 Each branch will remain secret until the government recognizes the party officially 8 The party heavily relied on Egyptian based press to spread its ideology As such it appealed more to the educated influential elite than it did to the masses Despite this many local Syrian notables who were in favor with the CUP opposed the party while many illiterate Arabs who absorbed the ideas through local newspaper readings supported it 5 The First World War EditWith the outbreak of the war the Ottoman state tightened its grip on Arab lands significantly The nascent Arab nationalist movement faced with the decision of supporting the state or agitating for independence became divided Party activity decreased as members adopted different projects away from the party By 1915 Jamal Pasha had begun to imprison Arab intellectuals he deemed disloyal In many cases they were sentenced on the grounds of treason on evidence either in the form of testimony of local notables or documents left in the French consulate in Beirut 11 This violent censorship culminated in the targeted executions of journalists and political activists on August 21 1915 and on May 6 1916 also known as Martyrs Day See also EditAl Fatat a similar pre independence groupReferences Edit Khoury Philip S 2003 Urban Notables and Arab Nationalism The Politics of Damascus 1860 1920 Cambridge University Press pp 52 ISBN 978 0521533232 Khoury 2003 p 56 a b Khoury 2003 p 62 Memories of A Turkish Statesman 1913 1919 by Djemal Pasha p 231 a b c Khoury 2003 p 63 Rogan Eugene 2015 The Fall of the Ottomans The Great War in the Middle East Basic Books ISBN 978 0465097425 a b Khalidi Rashid I Winter 1981 The Press as a Source for Modern Arab Political History Abd al Ghani al Uraisi and al Mufid Arab Studies Quarterly 3 1 26 JSTOR 41857558 a b Tauber Eliezer Jan 1997 Secrecy in Early Arab Nationalist Organizations Middle Eastern Studies 33 1 122 doi 10 1080 00263209708701145 JSTOR 4283850 Tauber 1997 p 123 Dawn C Ernest Spring 1962 The Rise of Arabism in Syria Middle East Journal 16 2 146 JSTOR 4323468 Bunton Martin 2016 A History of The Modern Middle East 6th Ed Westview Press p 145 ISBN 978 0 8133 4980 0 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Ottoman Party for Administrative Decentralization amp oldid 1167535434, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.