fbpx
Wikipedia

Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces

In mathematics, the Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces describes the dimension of linear systems on an algebraic surface. The classical form of it was first given by Castelnuovo (1896, 1897), after preliminary versions of it were found by Max Noether (1886) and Enriques (1894). The sheaf-theoretic version is due to Hirzebruch.

Statement edit

One form of the Riemann–Roch theorem states that if D is a divisor on a non-singular projective surface then

 

where χ is the holomorphic Euler characteristic, the dot . is the intersection number, and K is the canonical divisor. The constant χ(0) is the holomorphic Euler characteristic of the trivial bundle, and is equal to 1 + pa, where pa is the arithmetic genus of the surface. For comparison, the Riemann–Roch theorem for a curve states that χ(D) = χ(0) + deg(D).

Noether's formula edit

Noether's formula states that

 

where χ=χ(0) is the holomorphic Euler characteristic, c12 = (K.K) is a Chern number and the self-intersection number of the canonical class K, and e = c2 is the topological Euler characteristic. It can be used to replace the term χ(0) in the Riemann–Roch theorem with topological terms; this gives the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces.

Relation to the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem edit

For surfaces, the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem is essentially the Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces combined with the Noether formula. To see this, recall that for each divisor D on a surface there is an invertible sheaf L = O(D) such that the linear system of D is more or less the space of sections of L. For surfaces the Todd class is  , and the Chern character of the sheaf L is just  , so the Hirzebruch–Riemann–Roch theorem states that

 

Fortunately this can be written in a clearer form as follows. First putting D = 0 shows that

      (Noether's formula)

For invertible sheaves (line bundles) the second Chern class vanishes. The products of second cohomology classes can be identified with intersection numbers in the Picard group, and we get a more classical version of Riemann Roch for surfaces:

 

If we want, we can use Serre duality to express h2(O(D)) as h0(O(K − D)), but unlike the case of curves there is in general no easy way to write the h1(O(D)) term in a form not involving sheaf cohomology (although in practice it often vanishes).

Early versions edit

The earliest forms of the Riemann–Roch theorem for surfaces were often stated as an inequality rather than an equality, because there was no direct geometric description of first cohomology groups. A typical example is given by Zariski (1995, p. 78), which states that

 

where

  • r is the dimension of the complete linear system |D| of a divisor D (so r = h0(O(D)) −1)
  • n is the virtual degree of D, given by the self-intersection number (D.D)
  • π is the virtual genus of D, equal to 1 + (D.D + K.D)/2
  • pa is the arithmetic genus χ(OF) − 1 of the surface
  • i is the index of speciality of D, equal to dim H0(O(K − D)) (which by Serre duality is the same as dim H2(O(D))).

The difference between the two sides of this inequality was called the superabundance s of the divisor D. Comparing this inequality with the sheaf-theoretic version of the Riemann–Roch theorem shows that the superabundance of D is given by s = dim H1(O(D)). The divisor D was called regular if i = s = 0 (or in other words if all higher cohomology groups of O(D) vanish) and superabundant if s > 0.

References edit

  • Topological Methods in Algebraic Geometry by Friedrich Hirzebruch ISBN 3-540-58663-6
  • Zariski, Oscar (1995), Algebraic surfaces, Classics in Mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-58658-6, MR 1336146
  • Smith, Roy. "On Classical Riemann Roch and Hirzebruch's generalization" (PDF). Department of Mathematics Boyd Research and Education Center University of Georgia.

riemann, roch, theorem, surfaces, mathematics, describes, dimension, linear, systems, algebraic, surface, classical, form, first, given, castelnuovo, 1896, 1897, after, preliminary, versions, were, found, noether, 1886, enriques, 1894, sheaf, theoretic, versio. In mathematics the Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces describes the dimension of linear systems on an algebraic surface The classical form of it was first given by Castelnuovo 1896 1897 after preliminary versions of it were found by Max Noether 1886 and Enriques 1894 The sheaf theoretic version is due to Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem for surfacesFieldAlgebraic geometryFirst proof byGuido Castelnuovo Max Noether Federigo EnriquesFirst proof in1886 1894 1896 1897GeneralizationsAtiyah Singer index theoremGrothendieck Riemann Roch theoremHirzebruch Riemann Roch theoremConsequencesRiemann Roch theorem Contents 1 Statement 2 Noether s formula 3 Relation to the Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem 4 Early versions 5 ReferencesStatement editOne form of the Riemann Roch theorem states that if D is a divisor on a non singular projective surface then x D x 0 1 2 D D K displaystyle chi D chi 0 tfrac 1 2 D D K nbsp where x is the holomorphic Euler characteristic the dot is the intersection number and K is the canonical divisor The constant x 0 is the holomorphic Euler characteristic of the trivial bundle and is equal to 1 pa where pa is the arithmetic genus of the surface For comparison the Riemann Roch theorem for a curve states that x D x 0 deg D Noether s formula editNoether s formula states that x c 1 2 c 2 12 K K e 12 displaystyle chi frac c 1 2 c 2 12 frac K K e 12 nbsp where x x 0 is the holomorphic Euler characteristic c12 K K is a Chern number and the self intersection number of the canonical class K and e c2 is the topological Euler characteristic It can be used to replace the term x 0 in the Riemann Roch theorem with topological terms this gives the Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces Relation to the Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem editFor surfaces the Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem is essentially the Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces combined with the Noether formula To see this recall that for each divisor D on a surface there is an invertible sheaf L O D such that the linear system of D is more or less the space of sections of L For surfaces the Todd class is 1 c 1 X 2 c 1 X 2 c 2 X 12 displaystyle 1 c 1 X 2 c 1 X 2 c 2 X 12 nbsp and the Chern character of the sheaf L is just 1 c 1 L c 1 L 2 2 displaystyle 1 c 1 L c 1 L 2 2 nbsp so the Hirzebruch Riemann Roch theorem states that x D h 0 L h 1 L h 2 L 1 2 c 1 L 2 1 2 c 1 L c 1 X 1 12 c 1 X 2 c 2 X displaystyle begin aligned chi D amp h 0 L h 1 L h 2 L amp frac 1 2 c 1 L 2 frac 1 2 c 1 L c 1 X frac 1 12 left c 1 X 2 c 2 X right end aligned nbsp Fortunately this can be written in a clearer form as follows First putting D 0 shows that x 0 1 12 c 1 X 2 c 2 X displaystyle chi 0 frac 1 12 left c 1 X 2 c 2 X right nbsp Noether s formula For invertible sheaves line bundles the second Chern class vanishes The products of second cohomology classes can be identified with intersection numbers in the Picard group and we get a more classical version of Riemann Roch for surfaces x D x 0 1 2 D D D K displaystyle chi D chi 0 frac 1 2 D D D K nbsp If we want we can use Serre duality to express h2 O D as h0 O K D but unlike the case of curves there is in general no easy way to write the h1 O D term in a form not involving sheaf cohomology although in practice it often vanishes Early versions editThe earliest forms of the Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces were often stated as an inequality rather than an equality because there was no direct geometric description of first cohomology groups A typical example is given by Zariski 1995 p 78 which states that r n p p a 1 i displaystyle r geq n pi p a 1 i nbsp where r is the dimension of the complete linear system D of a divisor D so r h0 O D 1 n is the virtual degree of D given by the self intersection number D D p is the virtual genus of D equal to 1 D D K D 2 pa is the arithmetic genus x OF 1 of the surface i is the index of speciality of D equal to dim H0 O K D which by Serre duality is the same as dim H2 O D The difference between the two sides of this inequality was called the superabundance s of the divisor D Comparing this inequality with the sheaf theoretic version of the Riemann Roch theorem shows that the superabundance of D is given by s dim H1 O D The divisor D was called regular if i s 0 or in other words if all higher cohomology groups of O D vanish and superabundant if s gt 0 References editTopological Methods in Algebraic Geometry by Friedrich Hirzebruch ISBN 3 540 58663 6 Zariski Oscar 1995 Algebraic surfaces Classics in Mathematics Berlin New York Springer Verlag ISBN 978 3 540 58658 6 MR 1336146 Smith Roy On Classical Riemann Roch and Hirzebruch s generalization PDF Department of Mathematics Boyd Research and Education Center University of Georgia Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Riemann Roch theorem for surfaces amp oldid 1159563494, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.