fbpx
Wikipedia

Neo-Chalcedonism

Neo-Chalcedonism (also neo-Chalcedonianism) was a sixth-century theological movement in the Byzantine empire.[1] The term however is quite recent, first appearing in a 1909 work by J. Lebon.

Overview edit

The main preoccupation of neo-Chalcedonians was specifying the nature of the hypostatic union of two natures in Christ, which was left vague in the definition of Chalcedon. The dyophysite neo-chaldeconians were chiefly opposed by the monophysites, who increasingly labelled them Nestorians, that is, deniers of the deity of Christ.[2]

Major neo-Chalcedonians include Nephalios, John of Caesarea and Leontios of Jerusalem. They sought a middle ground with the so-called "verbal" (moderate) monophysites. They emphasised the synthesis of natures in Christ, employing a word favoured by the verbal monophysites, and the hypostatic as opposed to natural union of the natures. They continued to accept the proposition that only "one of the Trinity has suffered" and the twelve anathemas of Cyril of Alexandria.[2]

The movement achieved supremacy in Egypt during the pontificates of Anastasius I (559–69, 593–99) and Gregory (569–93) of Antioch. Emperor Justinian I accepted the neo-Chalcedonian interpretation, and it was approved officially at the Second Council of Constantinople in 553. This provoked the Schism of the Three Chapters, which lasted over a century.[2]

References edit

  1. ^ Karl-Heinz Uthemann, Christus, Kosmos, Diatribe: Themen der frühen Kirche als Beitrag zu einer historischen Theologie, De Gruyter, 2005
  2. ^ a b c Alexander Kazhdan, "Neo-chalcedonism", The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, ed. Alexander Kazhdan (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

Further reading edit

  • Allen, Pauline. "Neo-Chalcedonism and the Patriarchs of the Late Sixth Century". Byzantion 50 (1980): 5–17.
  • Gray, P. "Neo-Chalcedonianism and the Tradition: From Patristic to Byzantine Theology". Byzantinische Forschungen 8 (1982): 61–70.
  • Helmer, S. Der Neuchalkedonismus. Bonn, 1962.
  • Lebon, J. "Le monophysisme sevérien". Louvain, 1909.
  • Moeller, C. "Un représentant de la christologie néochalcédonienne au début du VIe siècle en Orient: Nephalius d'Alexandrie". Revue d'histoire ecclésiastique 40 (1944–45): 73–140.
  • Moeller, C. "Le chalcédonisme et le néo-chalcédonisme en Orient de 451 à la fin du VIe siècle". Das Konzil von Chalkedon, vol. 1 (Würzburg, 1951): 666–96.
  • Ostrogorsky, George (1956). History of the Byzantine State. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • Meyendorff, John (1989). Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions: The Church 450–680 A.D. The Church in history. Vol. 2. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press. ISBN 9780881410563.

chalcedonism, confused, with, chalcedonianism, also, chalcedonianism, sixth, century, theological, movement, byzantine, empire, term, however, quite, recent, first, appearing, 1909, work, lebon, overview, editthe, main, preoccupation, chalcedonians, specifying. Not to be confused with Non Chalcedonianism Neo Chalcedonism also neo Chalcedonianism was a sixth century theological movement in the Byzantine empire 1 The term however is quite recent first appearing in a 1909 work by J Lebon Overview editThe main preoccupation of neo Chalcedonians was specifying the nature of the hypostatic union of two natures in Christ which was left vague in the definition of Chalcedon The dyophysite neo chaldeconians were chiefly opposed by the monophysites who increasingly labelled them Nestorians that is deniers of the deity of Christ 2 Major neo Chalcedonians include Nephalios John of Caesarea and Leontios of Jerusalem They sought a middle ground with the so called verbal moderate monophysites They emphasised the synthesis of natures in Christ employing a word favoured by the verbal monophysites and the hypostatic as opposed to natural union of the natures They continued to accept the proposition that only one of the Trinity has suffered and the twelve anathemas of Cyril of Alexandria 2 The movement achieved supremacy in Egypt during the pontificates of Anastasius I 559 69 593 99 and Gregory 569 93 of Antioch Emperor Justinian I accepted the neo Chalcedonian interpretation and it was approved officially at the Second Council of Constantinople in 553 This provoked the Schism of the Three Chapters which lasted over a century 2 References edit Karl Heinz Uthemann Christus Kosmos Diatribe Themen der fruhen Kirche als Beitrag zu einer historischen Theologie De Gruyter 2005 a b c Alexander Kazhdan Neo chalcedonism The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium ed Alexander Kazhdan Oxford Oxford University Press 2005 Further reading editAllen Pauline Neo Chalcedonism and the Patriarchs of the Late Sixth Century Byzantion 50 1980 5 17 Gray P Neo Chalcedonianism and the Tradition From Patristic to Byzantine Theology Byzantinische Forschungen 8 1982 61 70 Helmer S Der Neuchalkedonismus Bonn 1962 Lebon J Le monophysisme severien Louvain 1909 Moeller C Un representant de la christologie neochalcedonienne au debut du VIe siecle en Orient Nephalius d Alexandrie Revue d histoire ecclesiastique 40 1944 45 73 140 Moeller C Le chalcedonisme et le neo chalcedonisme en Orient de 451 a la fin du VIe siecle Das Konzil von Chalkedon vol 1 Wurzburg 1951 666 96 Ostrogorsky George 1956 History of the Byzantine State Oxford Basil Blackwell Meyendorff John 1989 Imperial Unity and Christian Divisions The Church 450 680 A D The Church in history Vol 2 Crestwood NY St Vladimir s Seminary Press ISBN 9780881410563 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Neo Chalcedonism amp oldid 1172789032, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.