fbpx
Wikipedia

NK-33

The NK-33 and NK-43 are rocket engines designed and built in the late 1960s and early 1970s by the Kuznetsov Design Bureau. The NK designation is derived from the initials of chief designer Nikolay Kuznetsov. The NK-33 was among the most powerful LOX/RP-1 rocket engines when it was built, with a high specific impulse and low structural mass. They were intended for the ill-fated Soviet N1F Moon rocket, which was an upgraded version of the N1. The NK-33A rocket engine is now used on the first stage of the Soyuz-2-1v launch vehicle. When the supply of the NK-33 engines are exhausted, Russia will supply the new RD-193 rocket engine. It used to be the first stage engines of the Antares 100 rocket series, although those engines are rebranded the AJ-26 and the newer Antares 200 and Antares 200+ rocket series uses the RD-181 for the first stage engines, which is a modified RD-191, but shares some properties like a single combustion chamber unlike the two combustion chambers used in the RD-180 of the Atlas V and the four combustion chambers used in the RD-170 of the Energia and Zenit rocket families, and the RD-107, RD-108, RD-117, and RD-118 rocket engines used on all of the variants of the Soyuz rocket.

NK-33
The Russian NK-33 was modified and renamed the AJ26-58 by Aerojet. This AJ26-58 is shown on the test stand at John C. Stennis Space Center.
Country of originSoviet Union
Date1970s
DesignerKuznetsov Design Bureau
ManufacturerJSC Kuznetsov (Mashinostroitel)
Application1st/2nd-stage engine
PredecessorNK-15, NK-15V
SuccessorAJ26-58, AJ26-59, AJ26-62
Liquid-fuel engine
PropellantLOX / kerosene
CycleStaged combustion
PumpsTurbopump
Performance
Thrust, vacuum1,680 kN (380,000 lbf)
Thrust, sea-level1,510 kN (340,000 lbf)
Throttle range50–105%
Thrust-to-weight ratio137
Chamber pressure14.83 MPa (2,151 psi)
Specific impulse, vacuum331 seconds (3.25 km/s)
Specific impulse, sea-level297 seconds (2.91 km/s)
Dimensions
Length3.7 m (12 ft)
Diameter2 m (6 ft 7 in)
Dry weight1,240 kg (2,730 lb)
Used in
N-1, Antares 100, Soyuz 2.1-v
References
References[1]

Design Edit

 
Simplified diagram of NK33 rocket engine

The NK-33 series engines are high-pressure, regeneratively cooled oxygen-rich staged combustion cycle bipropellant rocket engines. The turbopumps require subcooled liquid oxygen (LOX) to cool the bearings.[2] These kinds of burners are highly unusual, since their hot, oxygen-rich exhaust tends to attack metal, causing burn-through failures. The United States had not investigated oxygen-rich combustion technologies until the Integrated Powerhead Demonstrator project in the early 2000s.[3] The Soviets, however, perfected the metallurgy behind this method. The nozzle was constructed from corrugated metal, brazed to an outer and inner lining, giving a simple, light, but strong structure. In addition, since the NK-33 uses LOX and RP-1 as propellants, which have similar densities, a single rotating shaft could be used for both turbopumps.[4][failed verification] The NK-33 engine has among the highest thrust-to-weight ratio of any Earth-launchable rocket engine; only the NPO Energomash RD-253 and SpaceX Merlin 1D engines achieve a higher ratio. The specific impulse of the NK-33 is significantly higher than both of these engines. The NK-43 is similar to the NK-33, but is designed for an upper stage, not a first stage. It has a longer nozzle, optimized for operation at altitude, where there is little to no ambient air pressure. This gives it a higher thrust and specific impulse, but makes it longer and heavier. It has a thrust-to-weight ratio of about 120:1.[5]

The predecessors of NK-33 and NK-43 are the earlier NK-15 and NK-15V engines respectively.

The oxygen-rich technology lives on in the RD-170/-171 engines, their RD-180, and recently developed RD-191 derivatives, but these engines have no direct connection to the NK-33 except for the oxygen-rich staged combustion cycle technology, the kerosene/RP-1 fuel, and in case of the RD-191 and its variants like the RD-193 and the RD-181, the single combustion chamber instead of the multiple chambers in previous Russian rocket engines.

History Edit

N-1 Edit

The N-1 launcher originally used NK-15 engines for its first stage and a high-altitude modification (NK-15V) in its second stage. After four consecutive launch failures and no successes, the project was cancelled. While other aspects of the vehicle were being modified or redesigned, Kuznetsov improved his contributions into the NK-33 and NK-43 respectively.[6] The 2nd-generation vehicle was to be called the N-1F. By this point the Moon race was long lost, and the Soviet space program was looking to the Energia as its heavy launcher. No N-1F ever reached the launch pad.[7]

When the N-1 program was shut down, all work on the project was ordered destroyed. A bureaucrat instead took the engines, worth millions of dollars each, and stored them in a warehouse. Word of the engines eventually spread to the US. Nearly 30 years after they were built, rocket engineers were led to the warehouse. One of the engines was later taken to the US, and the precise specification of the engine was demonstrated on a test stand.[7]

Combustion-chamber design Edit

The NK-33 closed-cycle technology works by sending the auxiliary engines' exhaust into the main combustion chamber. This made the engine design unique. This technology was believed to be impossible by Western rocket engineers.[8] The fully heated liquid O2 flows through the pre-burner and into the main chamber in this design. The extremely hot oxygen-rich mixture made the engine dangerous: it was known[by whom?] to melt 3-inch (76 mm) thick castings "like candle wax[citation needed]. One of the controversies in the Kremlin over supplying the engine to the US was that the design of the engine was similar to Russian ICBM engine design. The NK-33's design was used in the later RD-180 engine, which had twice the size of the NK-33. The RD-180 engines were used (as of 2016) to power the Atlas V rocket. This company also acquired a license for the production of new engines.[9][10][11]

Sale of engines to Aerojet Edit

About 60 engines survived in the "Forest of Engines", as described by engineers on a trip to the warehouse. In the mid-1990s, Russia sold 36 engines to Aerojet General for $1.1 million each, shipping them to the company facility in Sacramento CA.[12] During the engine test in Sacramento, the engine hit its specifications.

Aerojet has modified and renamed the updated NK-33 to AJ26-58, AJ-26-59 and AJ26-62, and NK-43 to AJ26-60.[9][10][11][13]

Kistler K-1 Edit

Kistler Aerospace, later called Rocketplane Kistler (RpK), designed their K-1 rocket around three NK-33s and an NK-43. On August 18, 2006, NASA announced that RpK had been chosen to develop Commercial Orbital Transportation Services for the International Space Station. The plan called for demonstration flights between 2008 and 2010. RpK would have received up to $207 million if they met all NASA milestones,[14][15][16] but on September 7, 2007, NASA issued a default letter, warning that it would terminate the COTS agreement with Rocketplane Kistler in 30 days because RpK had not met several contract milestones.[17]

Antares Edit

 
An Antares rocket being rolled out for testing, showing the two NK-33 engines

The initial version of the Orbital Sciences Antares light-to-medium-lift launcher had two modified NK-33 in the first stage, a solid Castor 30-based second stage and an optional solid or hypergolic third stage.[18] The NK-33s were imported from Russia to the United States, modified, and re-designated as Aerojet AJ26s. This involved removing some electrical harnessing, adding U.S. electronics, qualifying it for U.S. propellants, and modifying the steering system.[19]

In 2010 stockpiled NK-33 engines were successfully tested for use by the Orbital Sciences Antares light-to-medium-lift launcher.[19] The Antares rocket was successfully launched from NASA's Wallops Flight Facility on April 21, 2013. This marked the first successful launch of the NK-33 heritage engines built in early 1970s.[20]

Aerojet agreed to recondition sufficient NK-33s to serve Orbital's 16-flight NASA Commercial Resupply Services contract. Beyond that, it had a stockpile of 23 1960s- and 1970s-era engines. Kuznetsov no longer manufactures the engines, so Orbital sought to buy RD-180 engines. Because NPO Energomash's contract with United Launch Alliance prevented this, Orbital sued ULA, alleging anti-trust violations.[21] Aerojet offered to work with Kuznetsov to restart production of new NK-33 engines, to assure Orbital of an ongoing supply.[22] However, manufacturing defects in the engine's liquid-oxygen turbopump and design flaws in the hydraulic balance assembly and thrust bearings were proposed as two possible causes of the 2014 Antares launch failure.[23] As announced on 5 November 2014, Orbital decided to drop the AJ-26 first stage from the Antares and source an alternative engine. On 17 December 2014, Orbital Sciences announced that it would use the NPO Energomash RD-181 on second-generation Antares launch vehicles and had contracted directly with NPO Energomash for up to 60 RD-181 engines. Two engines are used on the first stage of the Antares 100-series.[24]

Current and proposed uses Edit

RSC Energia is proposing an "Aurora-L.SK" launch vehicle, which would use an NK-33 to power the first stage and a Blok DM-SL for the second stage.[25]

Soyuz-2-1v Edit

In the early 2010s the Soyuz launch vehicle family was retrofitted with the NK-33 engine – using the lower weight and greater efficiency to increase payload; the simpler design and use of surplus hardware might actually reduce cost.[26] TsSKB-Progress uses the NK-33 as the first-stage engine of the lightweight version of the Soyuz rocket family, the Soyuz-2-1v.[27] The NK-33A intended for the Soyuz-2-1v was successfully hot-fired on 15 January 2013,[28] following a series of cold-fire and systems tests of the fully assembled Soyuz-1 in 2011–2012.[29] The NK-33 powered rocket was finally designated Soyuz-2-1v, with its maiden flight having taken place on 28 December 2013. One NK-33 engine replaces the Soyuz's central RD-108, with the four boosters of the first stage omitted. A version of the Soyuz rocket with four boosters powered by NK-33 engines (with one engine per booster) has not been built, which results in a reduced payload compared to the Soyuz-2 launch vehicle.

Versions Edit

During the years there have been many versions of this engine:

  • NK-15 (GRAU index 11D51): Initial version for the N1 first stage.
  • NK-15V (GRAU index 11D52): Modified NK-15 optimized for vacuum operation, used on the N1 second stage.
  • NK-33 (GRAU index 11D111): Improved version for the N1F first stage, never flown.
  • NK-43 (GRAU index 11D112): Vacuum-optimized NK-33 for the N1F second stage, never flown.
  • AJ26-58 and AJ26-59: Modified NK-33 by Aerojet Rocketdyne. Planned used on the Kistler K-1.
  • AJ26-62: Modified NK-33 with additional gimbal mechanism by Aerojet Rocketdyne. Used on the Antares 100-series first stage.
  • NK-33A (GRAU index 14D15): Refurbished NK-33. Used on the Soyuz-2-1v first stage.
  • NK-33-1: Uprated NK-33 with gimbal mechanism. Planned used on the Soyuz-2.3 core stage.

Gallery Edit

See also Edit

References Edit

  1. ^ "LRE NC-33 (11D111) and NC-43 (11D112)" (in Russian). Retrieved 1 April 2015.
  2. ^ "Orbital ATK ready for Antares' second life". NASASpaceflight. 21 January 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2016.
  3. ^ U.S. Air Force-NASA Technology Demonstrator Engine for Future Launch Vehicles Successfully Fired During Initial Full Duration Test.
  4. ^ Astronautix NK-33 entry 2002-06-25 at the Wayback Machine.
  5. ^ Astronautix NK-43 entry 2007-10-28 at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Lindroos, Marcus. The Soviet Manned Lunar Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Accessed: 4 October 2011.
  7. ^ a b Clifton, Dan (2001-03-01). "The Engines That Came in from the Cold". Channel 4. London. Ideal World Productions. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
  8. ^ "NK-33 (14D15) rocket engine". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 2016-09-17.
  9. ^ a b . Aerojet. April 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-08-14.
  10. ^ a b Clark, Stephen (2010-12-19). "Taurus 2 main engine passes gimbal steering test". Spaceflight Now. Tonbridge, Kent, UK. from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 2014-01-03.
  11. ^ a b . Mark Wade (Encyclopedia Astronautica). Archived from the original on 2002-06-25. Retrieved 2006-03-25.
  12. ^ "Space Propulsion | Development of U.S. Closed-loop Kerolox Engine Stuck in 2nd Gear - SpaceNews.com". 2013-07-12. Retrieved 2016-09-17.
  13. ^ "MODIFICATION AND VERIFICATION TESTING OF A RUSSIAN NK-33 ROCKET ENGINE FOR REUSABLE AND RESTARTABLE APPLICATIONS" (PDF). Aerojet and N.D. Kuznetsov SSTC. (PDF) from the original on 2019-03-09. Retrieved 2020-08-17.
  14. ^ "NASA selects crew, cargo launch partners". Spaceflight Now. August 18, 2006.
  15. ^ "NASA Selects Crew and Cargo Transportation to Orbit Partners". SpaceRef. August 18, 2006.
  16. ^ Alan Boyle (August 18, 2006). "SpaceX, Rocketplane win spaceship contest". NBC News.
  17. ^ (Press release). Aviation Week. 2007-09-10. Archived from the original on 2011-05-12. Retrieved 2007-09-10.
  18. ^ "Antares" (PDF). Orbital.
  19. ^ a b Clark, Stephen (March 15, 2010). . Spaceflight Now. Archived from the original on 2013-08-13. Retrieved 2010-03-18.
  20. ^ Bill Chappell (21 April 2013). "Antares Rocket Launch Is A Success, In Test Of Orbital Supply Vehicle". NPR.
  21. ^ Dan Leone (June 24, 2013). "Orbital Sues ULA, Seeks RD-180 Engines, $515 Million in Damages". Space News. Archived from the original on October 30, 2013.
  22. ^ Amy Butler (24 June 2013). . Aviation Week and Space Technology. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013.
  23. ^ Clark, Stephen (November 1, 2015). "Two Antares failure probes produce different results". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2015-11-01.
  24. ^ Morring, Frank Jr. (16 December 2014). "Antares Upgrade Will Use RD-181s In Direct Buy From Energomash". Aviation Week. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  25. ^ . Energia. Archived from the original on 2008-05-27. Retrieved 2008-01-15.
  26. ^ "The Soyuz 1 (Soyuz 2-1v) Rocket". Russian Space Web. November 2010.
  27. ^ Zak, Anatoly. "The Soyuz-1 rocket". Russian Space Web. Retrieved 7 March 2010.
  28. ^ "NK-33 Engine Test Successful" (in Russian). Samara Today. 15 January 2013. Retrieved March 3, 2013.
  29. ^ "Kosmonavtika - par Nicolas Pillet".

External links Edit

  • The Engines That Came In From The Cold!, Equinox, Channel Four Television Corporation, 2000. Documentary video on Russian rocket engine development of the NK-33 and its predecessors for the N1 rocket. (NK-33 story starts at 24:15–26:00 (program shuttered in 1974); the 1990s resurgence and eventual sale of the remaining engines from storage starts at 27:25; first use on a US rocket launch in May 2000.)
  • NK-33 specifications & key components design (in Russian)

rocket, engines, designed, built, late, 1960s, early, 1970s, kuznetsov, design, bureau, designation, derived, from, initials, chief, designer, nikolay, kuznetsov, among, most, powerful, rocket, engines, when, built, with, high, specific, impulse, structural, m. The NK 33 and NK 43 are rocket engines designed and built in the late 1960s and early 1970s by the Kuznetsov Design Bureau The NK designation is derived from the initials of chief designer Nikolay Kuznetsov The NK 33 was among the most powerful LOX RP 1 rocket engines when it was built with a high specific impulse and low structural mass They were intended for the ill fated Soviet N1F Moon rocket which was an upgraded version of the N1 The NK 33A rocket engine is now used on the first stage of the Soyuz 2 1v launch vehicle When the supply of the NK 33 engines are exhausted Russia will supply the new RD 193 rocket engine It used to be the first stage engines of the Antares 100 rocket series although those engines are rebranded the AJ 26 and the newer Antares 200 and Antares 200 rocket series uses the RD 181 for the first stage engines which is a modified RD 191 but shares some properties like a single combustion chamber unlike the two combustion chambers used in the RD 180 of the Atlas V and the four combustion chambers used in the RD 170 of the Energia and Zenit rocket families and the RD 107 RD 108 RD 117 and RD 118 rocket engines used on all of the variants of the Soyuz rocket NK 33The Russian NK 33 was modified and renamed the AJ26 58 by Aerojet This AJ26 58 is shown on the test stand at John C Stennis Space Center Country of originSoviet UnionDate1970sDesignerKuznetsov Design BureauManufacturerJSC Kuznetsov Mashinostroitel Application1st 2nd stage enginePredecessorNK 15 NK 15VSuccessorAJ26 58 AJ26 59 AJ26 62Liquid fuel enginePropellantLOX keroseneCycleStaged combustionPumpsTurbopumpPerformanceThrust vacuum1 680 kN 380 000 lbf Thrust sea level1 510 kN 340 000 lbf Throttle range50 105 Thrust to weight ratio137Chamber pressure14 83 MPa 2 151 psi Specific impulse vacuum331 seconds 3 25 km s Specific impulse sea level297 seconds 2 91 km s DimensionsLength3 7 m 12 ft Diameter2 m 6 ft 7 in Dry weight1 240 kg 2 730 lb Used inN 1 Antares 100 Soyuz 2 1 vReferencesReferences 1 Contents 1 Design 2 History 2 1 N 1 2 2 Combustion chamber design 2 3 Sale of engines to Aerojet 2 4 Kistler K 1 2 5 Antares 3 Current and proposed uses 3 1 Soyuz 2 1v 4 Versions 5 Gallery 6 See also 7 References 8 External linksDesign Edit nbsp Simplified diagram of NK33 rocket engineThe NK 33 series engines are high pressure regeneratively cooled oxygen rich staged combustion cycle bipropellant rocket engines The turbopumps require subcooled liquid oxygen LOX to cool the bearings 2 These kinds of burners are highly unusual since their hot oxygen rich exhaust tends to attack metal causing burn through failures The United States had not investigated oxygen rich combustion technologies until the Integrated Powerhead Demonstrator project in the early 2000s 3 The Soviets however perfected the metallurgy behind this method The nozzle was constructed from corrugated metal brazed to an outer and inner lining giving a simple light but strong structure In addition since the NK 33 uses LOX and RP 1 as propellants which have similar densities a single rotating shaft could be used for both turbopumps 4 failed verification The NK 33 engine has among the highest thrust to weight ratio of any Earth launchable rocket engine only the NPO Energomash RD 253 and SpaceX Merlin 1D engines achieve a higher ratio The specific impulse of the NK 33 is significantly higher than both of these engines The NK 43 is similar to the NK 33 but is designed for an upper stage not a first stage It has a longer nozzle optimized for operation at altitude where there is little to no ambient air pressure This gives it a higher thrust and specific impulse but makes it longer and heavier It has a thrust to weight ratio of about 120 1 5 The predecessors of NK 33 and NK 43 are the earlier NK 15 and NK 15V engines respectively The oxygen rich technology lives on in the RD 170 171 engines their RD 180 and recently developed RD 191 derivatives but these engines have no direct connection to the NK 33 except for the oxygen rich staged combustion cycle technology the kerosene RP 1 fuel and in case of the RD 191 and its variants like the RD 193 and the RD 181 the single combustion chamber instead of the multiple chambers in previous Russian rocket engines History EditN 1 Edit The N 1 launcher originally used NK 15 engines for its first stage and a high altitude modification NK 15V in its second stage After four consecutive launch failures and no successes the project was cancelled While other aspects of the vehicle were being modified or redesigned Kuznetsov improved his contributions into the NK 33 and NK 43 respectively 6 The 2nd generation vehicle was to be called the N 1F By this point the Moon race was long lost and the Soviet space program was looking to the Energia as its heavy launcher No N 1F ever reached the launch pad 7 When the N 1 program was shut down all work on the project was ordered destroyed A bureaucrat instead took the engines worth millions of dollars each and stored them in a warehouse Word of the engines eventually spread to the US Nearly 30 years after they were built rocket engineers were led to the warehouse One of the engines was later taken to the US and the precise specification of the engine was demonstrated on a test stand 7 Combustion chamber design Edit The NK 33 closed cycle technology works by sending the auxiliary engines exhaust into the main combustion chamber This made the engine design unique This technology was believed to be impossible by Western rocket engineers 8 The fully heated liquid O2 flows through the pre burner and into the main chamber in this design The extremely hot oxygen rich mixture made the engine dangerous it was known by whom to melt 3 inch 76 mm thick castings like candle wax citation needed One of the controversies in the Kremlin over supplying the engine to the US was that the design of the engine was similar to Russian ICBM engine design The NK 33 s design was used in the later RD 180 engine which had twice the size of the NK 33 The RD 180 engines were used as of 2016 to power the Atlas V rocket This company also acquired a license for the production of new engines 9 10 11 Sale of engines to Aerojet Edit About 60 engines survived in the Forest of Engines as described by engineers on a trip to the warehouse In the mid 1990s Russia sold 36 engines to Aerojet General for 1 1 million each shipping them to the company facility in Sacramento CA 12 During the engine test in Sacramento the engine hit its specifications Aerojet has modified and renamed the updated NK 33 to AJ26 58 AJ 26 59 and AJ26 62 and NK 43 to AJ26 60 9 10 11 13 Kistler K 1 Edit Kistler Aerospace later called Rocketplane Kistler RpK designed their K 1 rocket around three NK 33s and an NK 43 On August 18 2006 NASA announced that RpK had been chosen to develop Commercial Orbital Transportation Services for the International Space Station The plan called for demonstration flights between 2008 and 2010 RpK would have received up to 207 million if they met all NASA milestones 14 15 16 but on September 7 2007 NASA issued a default letter warning that it would terminate the COTS agreement with Rocketplane Kistler in 30 days because RpK had not met several contract milestones 17 Antares Edit nbsp An Antares rocket being rolled out for testing showing the two NK 33 enginesThe initial version of the Orbital Sciences Antares light to medium lift launcher had two modified NK 33 in the first stage a solid Castor 30 based second stage and an optional solid or hypergolic third stage 18 The NK 33s were imported from Russia to the United States modified and re designated as Aerojet AJ26s This involved removing some electrical harnessing adding U S electronics qualifying it for U S propellants and modifying the steering system 19 In 2010 stockpiled NK 33 engines were successfully tested for use by the Orbital Sciences Antares light to medium lift launcher 19 The Antares rocket was successfully launched from NASA s Wallops Flight Facility on April 21 2013 This marked the first successful launch of the NK 33 heritage engines built in early 1970s 20 Aerojet agreed to recondition sufficient NK 33s to serve Orbital s 16 flight NASA Commercial Resupply Services contract Beyond that it had a stockpile of 23 1960s and 1970s era engines Kuznetsov no longer manufactures the engines so Orbital sought to buy RD 180 engines Because NPO Energomash s contract with United Launch Alliance prevented this Orbital sued ULA alleging anti trust violations 21 Aerojet offered to work with Kuznetsov to restart production of new NK 33 engines to assure Orbital of an ongoing supply 22 However manufacturing defects in the engine s liquid oxygen turbopump and design flaws in the hydraulic balance assembly and thrust bearings were proposed as two possible causes of the 2014 Antares launch failure 23 As announced on 5 November 2014 Orbital decided to drop the AJ 26 first stage from the Antares and source an alternative engine On 17 December 2014 Orbital Sciences announced that it would use the NPO Energomash RD 181 on second generation Antares launch vehicles and had contracted directly with NPO Energomash for up to 60 RD 181 engines Two engines are used on the first stage of the Antares 100 series 24 Current and proposed uses EditRSC Energia is proposing an Aurora L SK launch vehicle which would use an NK 33 to power the first stage and a Blok DM SL for the second stage 25 Soyuz 2 1v Edit In the early 2010s the Soyuz launch vehicle family was retrofitted with the NK 33 engine using the lower weight and greater efficiency to increase payload the simpler design and use of surplus hardware might actually reduce cost 26 TsSKB Progress uses the NK 33 as the first stage engine of the lightweight version of the Soyuz rocket family the Soyuz 2 1v 27 The NK 33A intended for the Soyuz 2 1v was successfully hot fired on 15 January 2013 28 following a series of cold fire and systems tests of the fully assembled Soyuz 1 in 2011 2012 29 The NK 33 powered rocket was finally designated Soyuz 2 1v with its maiden flight having taken place on 28 December 2013 One NK 33 engine replaces the Soyuz s central RD 108 with the four boosters of the first stage omitted A version of the Soyuz rocket with four boosters powered by NK 33 engines with one engine per booster has not been built which results in a reduced payload compared to the Soyuz 2 launch vehicle Versions EditDuring the years there have been many versions of this engine NK 15 GRAU index 11D51 Initial version for the N1 first stage NK 15V GRAU index 11D52 Modified NK 15 optimized for vacuum operation used on the N1 second stage NK 33 GRAU index 11D111 Improved version for the N1F first stage never flown NK 43 GRAU index 11D112 Vacuum optimized NK 33 for the N1F second stage never flown AJ26 58 and AJ26 59 Modified NK 33 by Aerojet Rocketdyne Planned used on the Kistler K 1 AJ26 62 Modified NK 33 with additional gimbal mechanism by Aerojet Rocketdyne Used on the Antares 100 series first stage NK 33A GRAU index 14D15 Refurbished NK 33 Used on the Soyuz 2 1v first stage NK 33 1 Uprated NK 33 with gimbal mechanism Planned used on the Soyuz 2 3 core stage Gallery Edit nbsp An Aerojet AJ26 rocket engine being delivered to the John C Stennis Space Center nbsp NASA Administrator Charles Bolden left and John C Stennis Space Center Director Patrick Scheuermann view a test firing of the first Aerojet AJ26 flight engine See also EditComparison of orbital rocket enginesReferences Edit LRE NC 33 11D111 and NC 43 11D112 in Russian Retrieved 1 April 2015 Orbital ATK ready for Antares second life NASASpaceflight 21 January 2016 Retrieved 18 March 2016 U S Air Force NASA Technology Demonstrator Engine for Future Launch Vehicles Successfully Fired During Initial Full Duration Test Astronautix NK 33 entry Archived 2002 06 25 at the Wayback Machine Astronautix NK 43 entry Archived 2007 10 28 at the Wayback Machine Lindroos Marcus The Soviet Manned Lunar Program Massachusetts Institute of Technology Accessed 4 October 2011 a b Clifton Dan 2001 03 01 The Engines That Came in from the Cold Channel 4 London Ideal World Productions Retrieved 2014 01 03 NK 33 14D15 rocket engine www russianspaceweb com Retrieved 2016 09 17 a b Space Lift Propulsion Aerojet April 2011 Archived from the original on 2011 08 14 a b Clark Stephen 2010 12 19 Taurus 2 main engine passes gimbal steering test Spaceflight Now Tonbridge Kent UK Archived from the original on 2013 10 29 Retrieved 2014 01 03 a b NK 33 Mark Wade Encyclopedia Astronautica Archived from the original on 2002 06 25 Retrieved 2006 03 25 Space Propulsion Development of U S Closed loop Kerolox Engine Stuck in 2nd Gear SpaceNews com 2013 07 12 Retrieved 2016 09 17 MODIFICATION AND VERIFICATION TESTING OF A RUSSIAN NK 33 ROCKET ENGINE FOR REUSABLE AND RESTARTABLE APPLICATIONS PDF Aerojet and N D Kuznetsov SSTC Archived PDF from the original on 2019 03 09 Retrieved 2020 08 17 NASA selects crew cargo launch partners Spaceflight Now August 18 2006 NASA Selects Crew and Cargo Transportation to Orbit Partners SpaceRef August 18 2006 Alan Boyle August 18 2006 SpaceX Rocketplane win spaceship contest NBC News RpK s COTS Contract Terminated Press release Aviation Week 2007 09 10 Archived from the original on 2011 05 12 Retrieved 2007 09 10 Antares PDF Orbital a b Clark Stephen March 15 2010 Aerojet confirms Russian engine is ready for duty Spaceflight Now Archived from the original on 2013 08 13 Retrieved 2010 03 18 Bill Chappell 21 April 2013 Antares Rocket Launch Is A Success In Test Of Orbital Supply Vehicle NPR Dan Leone June 24 2013 Orbital Sues ULA Seeks RD 180 Engines 515 Million in Damages Space News Archived from the original on October 30 2013 Amy Butler 24 June 2013 Orbital Frustrated By Lack Of Antares Engine Options Aviation Week and Space Technology Archived from the original on 29 October 2013 Clark Stephen November 1 2015 Two Antares failure probes produce different results Spaceflight Now Retrieved 2015 11 01 Morring Frank Jr 16 December 2014 Antares Upgrade Will Use RD 181s In Direct Buy From Energomash Aviation Week Retrieved 28 December 2014 S P Korolev RSC Energia LAUNCHERS Energia Archived from the original on 2008 05 27 Retrieved 2008 01 15 The Soyuz 1 Soyuz 2 1v Rocket Russian Space Web November 2010 Zak Anatoly The Soyuz 1 rocket Russian Space Web Retrieved 7 March 2010 NK 33 Engine Test Successful in Russian Samara Today 15 January 2013 Retrieved March 3 2013 Kosmonavtika par Nicolas Pillet External links EditThe Engines That Came In From The Cold Equinox Channel Four Television Corporation 2000 Documentary video on Russian rocket engine development of the NK 33 and its predecessors for the N1 rocket NK 33 story starts at 24 15 26 00 program shuttered in 1974 the 1990s resurgence and eventual sale of the remaining engines from storage starts at 27 25 first use on a US rocket launch in May 2000 NK 33 s specifications NK 33 specifications amp key components design in Russian nbsp Wikimedia Commons has media related to NK 33 Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title NK 33 amp oldid 1174378701, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.