fbpx
Wikipedia

Megaproject

A megaproject is an extremely large-scale investment project.[1] According to the Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management, "Megaprojects are large-scale, complex ventures that typically cost $1 billion or more, take many years to develop and build, involve multiple public and private stakeholders, are transformational, and impact millions of people".[2] However, $1 billion is not a constraint in defining megaprojects; in some contexts a relative approach is needed, such as in developing countries, where a much smaller project (such as one with a $100 million budget) could constitute a megaproject. Therefore, a more general definition is "Megaprojects are temporary endeavours (i.e. projects) characterised by: large investment commitment, vast complexity (especially in organisational terms), and long-lasting impact on the economy, the environment, and society".[3]

Itaipu Dam, an example of a 20th-century megaproject
The Trans-Siberian Railway and other railways in the Asiatic part of the Russian Empire in 1900—an important 19th-century megaproject

Bent Flyvbjerg, a professor at the Saïd Business School of the University of Oxford says that globally, megaprojects make up 8 percent of total global GDP.[4] Megaprojects refer not only to construction projects but also decommissioning projects, which are projects that can reach multi-billion budgets, and have a high level of innovation and complexity, and are affected by a number of techno-socio-economic and organizational challenges.[5][6]

The OFCCP Mega Construction Project (Megaproject) Program involves projects valued at over $35 million.[7]

Planning bias edit

Care in the project development process is required to reduce any possible optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation, as a curious paradox exists in which more and more megaprojects are being proposed despite their consistently poor performance against initial forecasts of budget, schedule, and benefits.[8]

Downsides edit

Megaprojects are often affected by corruption, leading to higher cost and lower benefit.[9]

According to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), megaprojects are characterized both by "extreme complexity (both in technical and human terms) and by a long record of poor delivery".[1] Megaprojects attract a lot of public attention because of substantial impacts on communities, environment, and budgets, and the high costs involved.[10] Megaprojects can also be defined as "initiatives that are physical, very expensive, and public".[11]

Examples edit

Megaprojects include special economic zones, public buildings, power plants, dams, airports, hospitals, seaports, bridges, highways, tunnels, railways, wastewater projects, oil and natural gas extraction projects, aerospace projects, weapons systems, information technology systems, large-scale sporting events and, more recently, mixed use waterfront redevelopments; however, the most common megaprojects are in the categories of hydroelectric facilities, nuclear power plants, and large public transportation projects. Megaprojects can also include large-scale high-cost initiatives in scientific research and infrastructure, such as the sequencing of the human genome, a significant global advance in genetics and biotechnology.

According to Bent Flyvbjerg, "As a general rule of thumb, 'megaprojects' are measured in billions of dollars, 'major projects' in hundreds of millions, and 'projects' in millions and tens of millions."[4]

Rationale edit

The logic[by whom?] on which many of the typical megaprojects are built is collective benefits; for example electricity for everybody (who can pay), road access (for those that have cars), etc. They may also serve as a means to open frontiers.[12] Megaprojects have been criticised for their top-down planning processes and their ill effects on certain communities. Large scale projects often advantage one group of people while disadvantaging another, for instance, the Three Gorges Dam in China, the largest hydroelectric project in the world,[13] required the displacement of 1.2 million farmers.[14][15] In the 1970s, the highway revolts in some Western nations saw urban activists opposing government plans to demolish buildings for freeway route construction, on the basis that such demolitions would unfairly disadvantage the urban working class and benefit commuters.[16] Anti-nuclear protests against proposed nuclear power plants in the United States and Germany prevented developments due to environmental and social concerns.[citation needed]

More recently,[when?] new types of megaprojects have been identified that no longer follow the old models of being singular and monolithic in their purposes, but have become quite flexible and diverse, such as waterfront redevelopment schemes that seem to offer something to everybody.[clarification needed][citation needed] However, just like the old megaprojects, the new ones also foreclose "upon a wide variety of social practices, reproducing rather than resolving urban inequality and disenfranchisement".[17] Because of their plethora of land uses "these mega-projects inhibit the growth of oppositional and contestational practices".[17] The collective benefits that are often the underlying logic of a mega-project, are here reduced to an individualized form of public benefit.

Flyvbjerg argues that policymakers are attracted to megaprojects for four reasons:

  • Technological sublime: the rapture that engineers and technologists get from building large and innovative projects, pushing the boundaries for what technology can do.
  • Political sublime: the rapture politicians get from building monuments to themselves and for their causes.
  • Economic sublime: the delight business people and trade unions receive from the profits and jobs created by megaprojects.
  • Aesthetic sublime: the pleasure designers and people who appreciate good design get from building, using, and looking at something very large that is also iconically beautiful.[4]

Economics edit

Proponents of infrastructure-based development advocate for funding large-scale projects to create long-term economic benefits. Investing in megaprojects in order to stimulate the general economy has been a popular policy measure since the economic crisis of the 1930s. Recent examples are the 2008–2009 Chinese economic stimulus program, the 2008 European Union stimulus plan, and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.

Megaprojects often raise capital based on expected returns—though projects often go overbudget and over time, and market conditions like commodity prices can change.[18] Concern at cost overruns is often expressed by critics of megaprojects during the planning phase. Bent Flyvbjerg has noted the existence of incentives to overstate income, underestimate costs, and exaggerate future social and economic benefits due to lack of accountability and risk-sharing mechanisms.[19] If the megaproject is delivered in a country with relevant corruption the likelihood and magnitude of having overbudgets increases.[20]

One of the most challenging aspects of megaprojects is obtaining sufficient funding. Alan Altshuler and David Luberoff have found that creative and politically adept political leadership is required to secure resources as well as generate public support, mollify critics, and manage conflict through many years of planning, authorization and implementation.[21] Other challenges faced by those planning megaprojects include laws and regulations that empower community groups, contested information and methodologies, high levels of uncertainty, avoiding impacts on neighborhoods and the environment, and attempting to solve a wicked problem.[22]

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ a b "Megaproject: The Effective Design and Delivery of Megaprojects in the EU". European Cooperation in Science and Technology.
  2. ^ Flyvbjerg, Bent (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management. Oxford University Press. p. 2. ISBN 978-0198732242.
  3. ^ Brookes, Naomi J.; Locatelli, Giorgio (2015-10-01). "Power plants as megaprojects: Using empirics to shape policy, planning, and construction management" (PDF). Utilities Policy. 36: 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2015.09.005. S2CID 8165155.
  4. ^ a b c Flyvbjerg, Bent (7 Apr 2014). "What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why: An Overview". Project Management Journal. 45 (2): 6–19. arXiv:1409.0003. Bibcode:2014arXiv1409.0003F. doi:10.1002/pmj.21409. S2CID 153469512. SSRN 2424835.
  5. ^ Invernizzi, Diletta Colette; Locatelli, Giorgio; Brookes, Naomi J. (October 2017). "Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry: A responsible approach towards better performance". International Journal of Project Management. 35 (7): 1350–1364. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.12.002.
  6. ^ Invernizzi, Diletta Colette; Locatelli, Giorgio; Grönqvist, Marcus; Brookes, Naomi J. (2019-01-28). . International Journal of Project Management. 37 (5): 668–683. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.004. ISSN 0263-7863. S2CID 115941020. Archived from the original on 1 Feb 2019. Alt URL
  7. ^ "Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs: Mega Construction Project Program".
  8. ^ Bent Flyvbjerg, Nils Bruzelius and Werner Rothengatter, Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition (Cambridge UK, Cambridge University Press, 2003). ISBN 0-521-00946-4
  9. ^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mariani, Giacomo; Sainati, Tristano; Greco, Marco (2017-04-01). "Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room!". International Journal of Project Management. 35 (3): 252–268. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.010.
  10. ^ "Project Delivery Defined". Federal Highway Administration. Prior to the enactment of SAFETEA-LU in August 2005, projects with over $1 billion in construction costs were designated as "Mega Projects". SAFETEA-LU has lowered the monetary threshold from an estimated total cost of $1 billion to $500 million or greater, and the term "Mega Project" has since been eliminated and replaced with the term "Major Project."
  11. ^ Alan Altshuler and David Luberoff, Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2003). ISBN 0-8157-0129-2
  12. ^ "The Political Economy of Very Large Space Projects". Journal of Evolution and Technology. November 1999. Retrieved 16 November 2015.
  13. ^ . Xinhua. 1 January 2014. Archived from the original on January 2, 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  14. ^ "Millions forced out by China dam". BBC News. 2007-10-12. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
  15. ^ Julie Chao (2001-05-15). "Relocation for Giant Dam Inflames Chinese Peasants". National Geographic. Retrieved 2008-01-20.
  16. ^ Gillham, Oliver; MacLean, Alex (2002), The Limitless City: A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate, Island Press, ISBN 978-1-55963-833-3
  17. ^ a b Lehrer, U.; Laidley, J. (2008). "Old Mega-projects Newly Packaged? Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 32 (4): 786–803. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00830.x.
  18. ^ "Crude Oil's Fall Pressures Energy Megaprojects". Wall Street Journal. 8 Dec 2014.
  19. ^ Flyvberg, B., Bruzelius, N., Rothengatter, W. Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  20. ^ Locatelli, Giorgio; Mariani, Giacomo; Sainati, Tristano; Greco, Marco (2017-04-01). "Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room!". International Journal of Project Management. 35 (3): 252–268. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.09.010.
  21. ^ Altshuler, Alan and David Luberoff. Mega-Projects: The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2003.
  22. ^ Plotch, Philip Mark. What's Taking So Long? Identifying the Underlying Causes of Delays in Planning Transportation Megaprojects in the United States. Journal of Planning Literature. Available online January 8, 2015.

External links edit

megaproject, this, article, lend, undue, weight, opinion, flyvbjerg, please, help, improve, rewriting, balanced, fashion, that, contextualizes, different, points, view, september, 2023, learn, when, remove, this, template, message, list, megaprojects, list, me. This article may lend undue weight to the opinion of Flyvbjerg et al Please help improve it by rewriting it in a balanced fashion that contextualizes different points of view September 2023 Learn how and when to remove this template message For a list of megaprojects see List of megaprojects For a list of megaprojects specifically related to transportation see List of transport megaprojects A megaproject is an extremely large scale investment project 1 According to the Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management Megaprojects are large scale complex ventures that typically cost 1 billion or more take many years to develop and build involve multiple public and private stakeholders are transformational and impact millions of people 2 However 1 billion is not a constraint in defining megaprojects in some contexts a relative approach is needed such as in developing countries where a much smaller project such as one with a 100 million budget could constitute a megaproject Therefore a more general definition is Megaprojects are temporary endeavours i e projects characterised by large investment commitment vast complexity especially in organisational terms and long lasting impact on the economy the environment and society 3 Itaipu Dam an example of a 20th century megaprojectThe Trans Siberian Railway and other railways in the Asiatic part of the Russian Empire in 1900 an important 19th century megaprojectBent Flyvbjerg a professor at the Said Business School of the University of Oxford says that globally megaprojects make up 8 percent of total global GDP 4 Megaprojects refer not only to construction projects but also decommissioning projects which are projects that can reach multi billion budgets and have a high level of innovation and complexity and are affected by a number of techno socio economic and organizational challenges 5 6 The OFCCP Mega Construction Project Megaproject Program involves projects valued at over 35 million 7 Contents 1 Planning bias 2 Downsides 3 Examples 4 Rationale 5 Economics 6 See also 7 References 8 External linksPlanning bias editMain article Planning fallacy Care in the project development process is required to reduce any possible optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation as a curious paradox exists in which more and more megaprojects are being proposed despite their consistently poor performance against initial forecasts of budget schedule and benefits 8 Downsides editMegaprojects are often affected by corruption leading to higher cost and lower benefit 9 According to the European Cooperation in Science and Technology COST megaprojects are characterized both by extreme complexity both in technical and human terms and by a long record of poor delivery 1 Megaprojects attract a lot of public attention because of substantial impacts on communities environment and budgets and the high costs involved 10 Megaprojects can also be defined as initiatives that are physical very expensive and public 11 Examples editMain articles List of megaprojects and List of transport megaprojects Megaprojects include special economic zones public buildings power plants dams airports hospitals seaports bridges highways tunnels railways wastewater projects oil and natural gas extraction projects aerospace projects weapons systems information technology systems large scale sporting events and more recently mixed use waterfront redevelopments however the most common megaprojects are in the categories of hydroelectric facilities nuclear power plants and large public transportation projects Megaprojects can also include large scale high cost initiatives in scientific research and infrastructure such as the sequencing of the human genome a significant global advance in genetics and biotechnology According to Bent Flyvbjerg As a general rule of thumb megaprojects are measured in billions of dollars major projects in hundreds of millions and projects in millions and tens of millions 4 Rationale editThe logic by whom on which many of the typical megaprojects are built is collective benefits for example electricity for everybody who can pay road access for those that have cars etc They may also serve as a means to open frontiers 12 Megaprojects have been criticised for their top down planning processes and their ill effects on certain communities Large scale projects often advantage one group of people while disadvantaging another for instance the Three Gorges Dam in China the largest hydroelectric project in the world 13 required the displacement of 1 2 million farmers 14 15 In the 1970s the highway revolts in some Western nations saw urban activists opposing government plans to demolish buildings for freeway route construction on the basis that such demolitions would unfairly disadvantage the urban working class and benefit commuters 16 Anti nuclear protests against proposed nuclear power plants in the United States and Germany prevented developments due to environmental and social concerns citation needed More recently when new types of megaprojects have been identified that no longer follow the old models of being singular and monolithic in their purposes but have become quite flexible and diverse such as waterfront redevelopment schemes that seem to offer something to everybody clarification needed citation needed However just like the old megaprojects the new ones also foreclose upon a wide variety of social practices reproducing rather than resolving urban inequality and disenfranchisement 17 Because of their plethora of land uses these mega projects inhibit the growth of oppositional and contestational practices 17 The collective benefits that are often the underlying logic of a mega project are here reduced to an individualized form of public benefit Flyvbjerg argues that policymakers are attracted to megaprojects for four reasons Technological sublime the rapture that engineers and technologists get from building large and innovative projects pushing the boundaries for what technology can do Political sublime the rapture politicians get from building monuments to themselves and for their causes Economic sublime the delight business people and trade unions receive from the profits and jobs created by megaprojects Aesthetic sublime the pleasure designers and people who appreciate good design get from building using and looking at something very large that is also iconically beautiful 4 Economics editProponents of infrastructure based development advocate for funding large scale projects to create long term economic benefits Investing in megaprojects in order to stimulate the general economy has been a popular policy measure since the economic crisis of the 1930s Recent examples are the 2008 2009 Chinese economic stimulus program the 2008 European Union stimulus plan and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Megaprojects often raise capital based on expected returns though projects often go overbudget and over time and market conditions like commodity prices can change 18 Concern at cost overruns is often expressed by critics of megaprojects during the planning phase Bent Flyvbjerg has noted the existence of incentives to overstate income underestimate costs and exaggerate future social and economic benefits due to lack of accountability and risk sharing mechanisms 19 If the megaproject is delivered in a country with relevant corruption the likelihood and magnitude of having overbudgets increases 20 One of the most challenging aspects of megaprojects is obtaining sufficient funding Alan Altshuler and David Luberoff have found that creative and politically adept political leadership is required to secure resources as well as generate public support mollify critics and manage conflict through many years of planning authorization and implementation 21 Other challenges faced by those planning megaprojects include laws and regulations that empower community groups contested information and methodologies high levels of uncertainty avoiding impacts on neighborhoods and the environment and attempting to solve a wicked problem 22 See also editList of megaprojects List of transport megaprojects Macro engineering Megastructure Reference class forecasting Optimism bias Megaprojects and Risk When Technology FailsReferences edit a b Megaproject The Effective Design and Delivery of Megaprojects in the EU European Cooperation in Science and Technology Flyvbjerg Bent 2017 The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management Oxford University Press p 2 ISBN 978 0198732242 Brookes Naomi J Locatelli Giorgio 2015 10 01 Power plants as megaprojects Using empirics to shape policy planning and construction management PDF Utilities Policy 36 57 66 doi 10 1016 j jup 2015 09 005 S2CID 8165155 a b c Flyvbjerg Bent 7 Apr 2014 What You Should Know About Megaprojects and Why An Overview Project Management Journal 45 2 6 19 arXiv 1409 0003 Bibcode 2014arXiv1409 0003F doi 10 1002 pmj 21409 S2CID 153469512 SSRN 2424835 Invernizzi Diletta Colette Locatelli Giorgio Brookes Naomi J October 2017 Managing social challenges in the nuclear decommissioning industry A responsible approach towards better performance International Journal of Project Management 35 7 1350 1364 doi 10 1016 j ijproman 2016 12 002 Invernizzi Diletta Colette Locatelli Giorgio Gronqvist Marcus Brookes Naomi J 2019 01 28 Applying value management when it seems that there is no value to be managed the case of nuclear decommissioning International Journal of Project Management 37 5 668 683 doi 10 1016 j ijproman 2019 01 004 ISSN 0263 7863 S2CID 115941020 Archived from the original on 1 Feb 2019 Alt URL Office of Federal Contractor Compliance Programs Mega Construction Project Program Bent Flyvbjerg Nils Bruzelius and Werner Rothengatter Megaprojects and Risk An Anatomy of Ambition Cambridge UK Cambridge University Press 2003 ISBN 0 521 00946 4 Locatelli Giorgio Mariani Giacomo Sainati Tristano Greco Marco 2017 04 01 Corruption in public projects and megaprojects There is an elephant in the room International Journal of Project Management 35 3 252 268 doi 10 1016 j ijproman 2016 09 010 Project Delivery Defined Federal Highway Administration Prior to the enactment of SAFETEA LU in August 2005 projects with over 1 billion in construction costs were designated as Mega Projects SAFETEA LU has lowered the monetary threshold from an estimated total cost of 1 billion to 500 million or greater and the term Mega Project has since been eliminated and replaced with the term Major Project Alan Altshuler and David Luberoff Mega Projects The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment Washington DC Brookings Institution 2003 ISBN 0 8157 0129 2 The Political Economy of Very Large Space Projects Journal of Evolution and Technology November 1999 Retrieved 16 November 2015 Three Gorges breaks world record for hydropower generation Xinhua 1 January 2014 Archived from the original on January 2 2015 Retrieved 2 January 2015 Millions forced out by China dam BBC News 2007 10 12 Retrieved 2008 01 20 Julie Chao 2001 05 15 Relocation for Giant Dam Inflames Chinese Peasants National Geographic Retrieved 2008 01 20 Gillham Oliver MacLean Alex 2002 The Limitless City A Primer on the Urban Sprawl Debate Island Press ISBN 978 1 55963 833 3 a b Lehrer U Laidley J 2008 Old Mega projects Newly Packaged Waterfront Redevelopment in Toronto International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 4 786 803 doi 10 1111 j 1468 2427 2008 00830 x Crude Oil s Fall Pressures Energy Megaprojects Wall Street Journal 8 Dec 2014 Flyvberg B Bruzelius N Rothengatter W Megaprojects and Risk An Anatomy of Ambition Cambridge Cambridge University Press Locatelli Giorgio Mariani Giacomo Sainati Tristano Greco Marco 2017 04 01 Corruption in public projects and megaprojects There is an elephant in the room International Journal of Project Management 35 3 252 268 doi 10 1016 j ijproman 2016 09 010 Altshuler Alan and David Luberoff Mega Projects The Changing Politics of Urban Public Investment Washington D C Brookings Institution 2003 Plotch Philip Mark What s Taking So Long Identifying the Underlying Causes of Delays in Planning Transportation Megaprojects in the United States Journal of Planning Literature Available online January 8 2015 External links edit 1 Mega project eu a website run by European Cooperation in Science and Technology Borovoye Biocity megaproject of Bionic City for Kazakhstan S Rastorguev M Kudryashov 2008 Catalogue of Catastrophe list of troubled large projects Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title Megaproject amp oldid 1181149162, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.