fbpx
Wikipedia

2008 Massachusetts Question 2

The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative, also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2, was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil penalties on adults possessing an ounce or less of marijuana. The initiative appeared on the November 4, 2008, ballot in Massachusetts.

Question 2
Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative
Results
Choice
Votes %
Yes 1,949,704 65.25%
No 1,038,523 34.75%
Valid votes 2,988,227 100.00%
Invalid or blank votes 0 0.00%
Total votes 2,988,227 100.00%

The measure was passed on Nov 4.[1] and became public law on January 2, 2009

Question 2:

  • Replaced criminal penalties with a US$100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place.
  • Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reports for minor marijuana related infractions.
  • Maintained then-current penalties for selling, growing, and trafficking marijuana, as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of marijuana.
  • The law requires additional penalties for minors such as Parental notification, compulsory drug awareness program, and 10 hours community service that was not required under prior law. It also requires a larger US$1,000 fine and possible delinquency proceedings for those under 17 if they do not complete the requirements of the law.

The law represents a break with prior law in Massachusetts, where people charged with marijuana possession faced criminal penalties of up to six months in jail and a US$500 fine, as well as a CORI report being filed.

On Tuesday, September 10, 2008, a city councillor in Worcester called for a vote on a measure to express the opposition by the city of Worcester to the initiative. The city council rejected and voted down the measure by a 10-1 vote, with the only vote for the measure coming from the councillor that requested the vote.[2]

Supporters edit

The Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy is the leading proponent of the initiative.[3]

Organizations edit

Individuals edit

  • Paul T. Breeden - President/CEO Boston Live Magazine/Boston Live Charity Fund Inc.
  • Ronald Ansin, ACLU, philanthropist
  • Charles H. Baron, Esq., Boston College School of Law
  • Jack Cole, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
  • Michael D. Cutler, Esq.
  • Richard Elliott Doblin, PhD, MAPS
  • Sergeant Howard Donohue, a 33-year veteran of the Boston Police Department
  • Lester Grinspoon, M.D., associate professor emeritus of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School
  • John H. Halpern, M.D., assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School
  • Massachusetts state Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Second Middlesex), chair of the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs and Vice-Chair of the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight
  • Wendy Kaminer, Esq., ACLU, author, journalist
  • Woody Kaplan, ACLU, philanthropist
  • Thomas R. Kiley, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley
  • Karen Klein, Brandeis University, Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform
  • Lanny Kutakoff, Partakers, Inc.
  • Dr. Robert Meenan, dean of the Boston University School of Public Health
  • Lieutenant Thomas Nolan, a 30-year veteran of the Boston Police Department who now teaches criminology at Boston University
  • Massachusetts state Rep. Frank Smizik (D-Fifteenth Norfolk), chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture
  • Carl Valvo, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley
  • Ernest "Tony" Windsor, Esq., Massachusetts Law Reform Institute
  • George Soros - Hedge Fund Manager
  • Massachusetts State Rep. Jim O'Day (D-fourteenth Worcester)[5]

Religious Leaders edit

  • Rev. Jean Alexander, Auburndale
  • Rabbi Alan Alpert, Leominster
  • Rev. Molly Baskette, Somerville
  • Father Richard Beaulieu, Winchester
  • Rev. Jim Bronwell, Barre
  • Rev. Suzanne Brunnquell, Pittsfield
  • Rev. Sarah Buteux, Amherst
  • Rev. Dr. Jan Carlsson-Bull, Cohasset
  • Rev. Thomas Carlton, Ludlow
  • Rev. Stephen Cook
  • Father Richard Crowley, Middleboro
  • Rev. C. Edward Deyton, Andover
  • Father Thomas Dilorenzo, Winthrop
  • Rev. Jonathan Drury, Andover
  • Rev. Leigh Dry, Hopkinton
  • Rev. Kathrene Duhon, Great Barrington
  • Rev. Lisa Durkee Abbott, West Brookfield
  • Rev. Dr. Dorothy May Emerson, Billerica
  • Rev. Marc Fredette, Waltham
  • Rev. Tamarack Garlow, Ashley Falls
  • Rev. John Gibbons, Bedford
  • Rev. Jamie Green, West Groton
  • Rev. Edward Hardy, Abington
  • Rev. William Hobbs, Athol
  • Rev. Dr. Anne Ierardi, Yarmouthport
  • Ms. Marion Jansen, Great Barrington
  • Rev. David Johnson, Plymouth
  • Rev. Bill Leggett, Milford
  • Father John Lis, Williamsburg
  • Rev. Jeffrey Long-Middleton, Acton
  • Rev. Ian Lynch, Brimfield
  • Rev. Art McDonald, Essex
  • Rabbi Richard Messing, North Easton
  • Rev. Stephen Philbrick, Cummington
  • Rev. Susie Phoenix, Lee
  • Rev. Katherine Reis, Rockport
  • Rev. Edmund Robinson, Chatham
  • Rev. Ken Sawyer, Wayland
  • Rev. Dr. Victor Scalise, Somerville
  • Rev. Warren Scamman, Windsor
  • Rev. Richard Schlak, Foxboro
  • Rev. Stephen Shick, Hudson
  • Rev. Judith Smith-Valley, Brewster
  • Rev. Paul Sprecher, Hingham
  • Rev. C. William Steelman, Nantucket
  • Rev. Rachel Tedesco, Taunton
  • Rev. Jonathan Tetherly, Chicopee
  • Rev. Patricia Tummino, Middleboro
  • Rabbi Andrew Vogel, Brookline
  • Rev. Vicki Woods, Worcester
  • Rev. Dr. Judith Wright, Boylston

Newspaper Editorial endorsements edit

  • The Daily Free Press
  • The Bay state Banner
  • The Harvard Crimson
  • The Newton TAB
  • The Milford Daily News
  • The Springfield Republican
  • The Metrowest Daily News
  • The Daily News Tribune
  • The Brookline TAB
  • The Fall River Herald News
  • The Danvers Herald
  • MIT Tech

Polls edit

A Suffolk University / WHDH Channel 7 poll has shown that 72 percent of Greater Boston residents are in favor of replacing criminal penalties with civil fines for carrying an ounce or less of marijuana. "The public may be signaling that pursuing small-time marijuana users is a waste of taxpayer resources," said David Paleologos, director of the Political Research Bureau at Suffolk University. "This issue suggests there is a libertarian streak in the thinking of the Massachusetts voter." The poll was conducted with 400 residents between July 31 and August 3, 2008.[6]

A FastTrack poll by WBZ TV /Survey USA on September 17 showed that 69% of all Massachusetts voters would favor either decriminalization or legalization. It was broken down to 30% want it remain a crime, 31% want it changed to a civil fine and 38% would like it to be legalized completely. The poll had a margin of error of 4.5%.[7]

Arguments in favor edit

Supporting arguments advanced by the proponents include:[8]

  • It would save Massachusetts US$130 million per year, according to a 2002 report by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron.
  • Instances of minor marijuana possession would no longer affect if people can obtain jobs, housing, and student loans.
  • Currently there are about 2.8 million CORI records on file for a population of 6 million.
  • Small convictions have been shown to have little or no impact on drug use.

History edit

The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (also known as the Shafer Commission) was created by Public Law 91-513 in 1972 to study marijuana abuse in the United States. It published its findings in a report called Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding and recommended that the president should decriminalize possession of marijuana in amounts that constituted "simple possession".[9]

So far 30 non-binding public policy questions calling for civil fines for possession of marijuana rather than criminal penalties have passed in legislative districts throughout Massachusetts since 2000. These questions were passed with an average of 62% of the vote in favor. No Public policy question related to replacing criminal penalties with civil fines has ever failed in the state of Massachusetts.[10]

The Joint Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee of the Massachusetts General Court voted 6-1 in favor of a bill that would have made possession of less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine.[11]

Funding edit

Billionaire George Soros made an initial contribution of $400,000. The committee has also received $750,000 cash as well as about $320,000 in donated time and services from the Marijuana Policy Project, an organization created to reform marijuana laws in the United States. According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the committee has raised approximately $1,250,000 to help pass the measure with $40,060.90 remaining.[12]

Opposition edit

The Coalition for Safe Streets, a committee organized to oppose Question 2, launched a statewide campaign Sept. 5 to defeat the measure. Jonathan W. Blodgett, the Essex County District Attorney serves as the Coalition's treasurer and chairman.

Michael O'Keefe, the president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association, is opposed to the initiative. He believes that the measure will lead to an increase in minors using the drug by sending the wrong message to them.

The O'Keefe Committee is one of ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts that have contributed to the Coalition.[13]

William Breault, chairman of the Main South Alliance for Public Safety in Worcester, also plans to oppose this initiative.

Funding edit

According to Campaign Finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts have contributed approximately $2,275 each to the Coalition along with a donation of $2,500 from the Worcester County Deputy Sheriffs Association as well as a few other donors for a total of approx $60,000, after expenditures they have $0 to fight the initiative and $2,601.92 in outstanding liabilities.[14]

Controversies edit

On September 17, 2008, the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy filed complaints with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance and the Attorney General's office against the Massachusetts District Attorney Association, the 11 state district attorneys and O'Neill and Associates, a Boston public relations firm. Violations of the campaign finance law could result in up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.[15][16]

Also, Middlesex District Attorney Gerry Leone has stated that in the event the majority of voters in the State of Massachusetts were to pass the initiative, he will attempt to override the vote and defeat it in an appellate process.[17]

Alleged Complaints edit

  • Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to, attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could.
  • CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site, a violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative. The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved, "any person may carry and use marijuana at any time," which is untrue.

Petition drive to qualify edit

The support group collected over 105,000 signatures, far exceeding the requirement of 66,593 valid signatures. Since Massachusetts is an indirect initiative state, this meant that the Massachusetts State Legislature had to take up the proposed measure. Since the legislature declined to act on it by early May, the supporters then had until June 18, 2008, to collect another 11,099 signatures to ensure that the initiative is placed on the November 2008 statewide ballot, a goal at which they succeeded.[18][19][20]

Results edit

Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative[21][22]
Choice Votes %
  Yes 1,949,704 65.25
No 1,038,523 34.75
Valid votes 2,988,227 96.30
Invalid or blank votes 114,768 3.70
Total votes 3,102,995 100.00
Registered voters/turnout 4,220,488 73.52

Enactment edit

As per Massachusetts law, the initiative became public law on January 2, 2009, 30 days from the date it was presented to the Governor's Council and certified.

See also edit

References edit

  1. ^ "States issue verdicts on gay rights, abortion". NBC News. 2008-11-05. Retrieved 2010-09-15.
  2. ^ "City of Worcester Council Journal for 09/09/2008". www.worcesterma.gov. Retrieved 2020-04-02.
  3. ^ Sensible Marijuana Policy
  4. ^ Youth Education called strength of marijuana bill
  5. ^ Worcester Magazine - Up in Smoke
  6. ^ The Daily Cannabinoid: "Massachusetts Looks To Turn Over New Leaf On Pot," Aug 15, 2008
  7. ^ WBZ-TV Video Archive
  8. ^ Boston Herald: "Marijuana measures head to voters, Hill," Jan. 27, 2008
  9. ^ Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding - 1972 Report
  10. ^ MPP-New poll shows 71% in favor of Massachusetts decriminalization initiative!
  11. ^ Milliote, Gregg. "Marijuana fight nears". The Herald News. Fall River, Mass. Retrieved 2007-06-06.
  12. ^ Committee for sensible marijuana policy donations 2008-10-05 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ^ Cape Cod Today: "District attorney opposes decriminalization of marijuana," Sep 8, 2008
  14. ^ Coalition for safe streets finance reports
  15. ^ Boston.com: "Supporters of marijuana ballot question lodge complaint," Sep 18, 2008
  16. ^ Berkshire Eagle: "Marijuana proponents take on state attorneys," Sep 18, 2008
  17. ^ The Boston Phoenix "Blunt object" Sep 24, 2008
  18. ^ Boston Globe: "4 ballot petitions clear 1st obstacle," Nov. 24, 2007
  19. ^ Boston Globe: "Proposal to decriminalize pot clears a hurdle," Nov, 21, 2007
  20. ^ Massachusetts Law Updates: "Proposals to decriminalize marijuana," February 1, 2008
  21. ^ (PDF). Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth. 2008-12-17. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-02-25. Retrieved 2008-11-05.
  22. ^ "Enrollment Breakdown as of 15 October 2008" (PDF). Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth. 2008-10-30. Retrieved 2008-11-05.

External links edit

  • Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy
  • Sensible Marijuana Policy Ballot Language
  • Attorney General's Opinion 07-09
  • Campaign finance registration statement of support committee
  • Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Radio spot
  • Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Television spots

2008, massachusetts, question, sensible, marijuana, policy, initiative, also, known, massachusetts, ballot, question, initiated, state, statute, that, replaced, prior, criminal, penalties, with, civil, penalties, adults, possessing, ounce, less, marijuana, ini. The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2 was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil penalties on adults possessing an ounce or less of marijuana The initiative appeared on the November 4 2008 ballot in Massachusetts Question 2Sensible Marijuana Policy InitiativeResultsChoice Votes Yes 1 949 704 65 25 No 1 038 523 34 75 Valid votes 2 988 227 100 00 Invalid or blank votes 0 0 00 Total votes 2 988 227 100 00 County resultsMunicipality resultsPrecinct resultsYes 80 90 70 80 60 70 50 60 No 60 70 50 60 Other No votes The measure was passed on Nov 4 1 and became public law on January 2 2009Question 2 Replaced criminal penalties with a US 100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information CORI reports for minor marijuana related infractions Maintained then current penalties for selling growing and trafficking marijuana as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of marijuana The law requires additional penalties for minors such as Parental notification compulsory drug awareness program and 10 hours community service that was not required under prior law It also requires a larger US 1 000 fine and possible delinquency proceedings for those under 17 if they do not complete the requirements of the law The law represents a break with prior law in Massachusetts where people charged with marijuana possession faced criminal penalties of up to six months in jail and a US 500 fine as well as a CORI report being filed On Tuesday September 10 2008 a city councillor in Worcester called for a vote on a measure to express the opposition by the city of Worcester to the initiative The city council rejected and voted down the measure by a 10 1 vote with the only vote for the measure coming from the councillor that requested the vote 2 Contents 1 Supporters 1 1 Organizations 1 2 Individuals 1 3 Religious Leaders 1 4 Newspaper Editorial endorsements 1 5 Polls 1 6 Arguments in favor 1 7 History 1 8 Funding 2 Opposition 2 1 Funding 3 Controversies 3 1 Alleged Complaints 4 Petition drive to qualify 5 Results 6 Enactment 7 See also 8 References 9 External linksSupporters editThe Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy is the leading proponent of the initiative 3 Organizations edit National Association of Social Workers Massachusetts Chapter Greater Boston Civil Rights Coalition Criminal Justice Policy Coalition American Civil Liberties Union National Law Enforcement Against Prohibition American Civil Liberties Union Massachusetts chapter National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition Inc aka MassCann Univ of Massachusetts Amherst Cannabis Reform Coalition not part of prev listed group MassCann Union of Minority Neighborhoods The Boston Worker s Alliance Marijuana Policy Project Brookline Police Department 4 Individuals edit Paul T Breeden President CEO Boston Live Magazine Boston Live Charity Fund Inc Ronald Ansin ACLU philanthropist Charles H Baron Esq Boston College School of Law Jack Cole Law Enforcement Against Prohibition Michael D Cutler Esq Richard Elliott Doblin PhD MAPS Sergeant Howard Donohue a 33 year veteran of the Boston Police Department Lester Grinspoon M D associate professor emeritus of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School John H Halpern M D assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School Massachusetts state Sen Patricia Jehlen D Second Middlesex chair of the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs and Vice Chair of the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight Wendy Kaminer Esq ACLU author journalist Woody Kaplan ACLU philanthropist Thomas R Kiley Esq Cosgrove Eisenberg amp Kiley Karen Klein Brandeis University Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform Lanny Kutakoff Partakers Inc Dr Robert Meenan dean of the Boston University School of Public Health Lieutenant Thomas Nolan a 30 year veteran of the Boston Police Department who now teaches criminology at Boston University Massachusetts state Rep Frank Smizik D Fifteenth Norfolk chair of the Joint Committee on Environment Natural Resources and Agriculture Carl Valvo Esq Cosgrove Eisenberg amp Kiley Ernest Tony Windsor Esq Massachusetts Law Reform Institute George Soros Hedge Fund Manager Massachusetts State Rep Jim O Day D fourteenth Worcester 5 Religious Leaders edit Rev Jean Alexander Auburndale Rabbi Alan Alpert Leominster Rev Molly Baskette Somerville Father Richard Beaulieu Winchester Rev Jim Bronwell Barre Rev Suzanne Brunnquell Pittsfield Rev Sarah Buteux Amherst Rev Dr Jan Carlsson Bull Cohasset Rev Thomas Carlton Ludlow Rev Stephen Cook Father Richard Crowley Middleboro Rev C Edward Deyton Andover Father Thomas Dilorenzo Winthrop Rev Jonathan Drury Andover Rev Leigh Dry Hopkinton Rev Kathrene Duhon Great Barrington Rev Lisa Durkee Abbott West Brookfield Rev Dr Dorothy May Emerson Billerica Rev Marc Fredette Waltham Rev Tamarack Garlow Ashley Falls Rev John Gibbons Bedford Rev Jamie Green West Groton Rev Edward Hardy Abington Rev William Hobbs Athol Rev Dr Anne Ierardi Yarmouthport Ms Marion Jansen Great Barrington Rev David Johnson Plymouth Rev Bill Leggett Milford Father John Lis Williamsburg Rev Jeffrey Long Middleton Acton Rev Ian Lynch Brimfield Rev Art McDonald Essex Rabbi Richard Messing North Easton Rev Stephen Philbrick Cummington Rev Susie Phoenix Lee Rev Katherine Reis Rockport Rev Edmund Robinson Chatham Rev Ken Sawyer Wayland Rev Dr Victor Scalise Somerville Rev Warren Scamman Windsor Rev Richard Schlak Foxboro Rev Stephen Shick Hudson Rev Judith Smith Valley Brewster Rev Paul Sprecher Hingham Rev C William Steelman Nantucket Rev Rachel Tedesco Taunton Rev Jonathan Tetherly Chicopee Rev Patricia Tummino Middleboro Rabbi Andrew Vogel Brookline Rev Vicki Woods Worcester Rev Dr Judith Wright Boylston Newspaper Editorial endorsements edit The Daily Free Press The Bay state Banner The Harvard Crimson The Newton TAB The Milford Daily News The Springfield Republican The Metrowest Daily News The Daily News Tribune The Brookline TAB The Fall River Herald News The Danvers Herald MIT Tech Polls edit A Suffolk University WHDH Channel 7 poll has shown that 72 percent of Greater Boston residents are in favor of replacing criminal penalties with civil fines for carrying an ounce or less of marijuana The public may be signaling that pursuing small time marijuana users is a waste of taxpayer resources said David Paleologos director of the Political Research Bureau at Suffolk University This issue suggests there is a libertarian streak in the thinking of the Massachusetts voter The poll was conducted with 400 residents between July 31 and August 3 2008 6 A FastTrack poll by WBZ TV Survey USA on September 17 showed that 69 of all Massachusetts voters would favor either decriminalization or legalization It was broken down to 30 want it remain a crime 31 want it changed to a civil fine and 38 would like it to be legalized completely The poll had a margin of error of 4 5 7 Arguments in favor edit Supporting arguments advanced by the proponents include 8 It would save Massachusetts US 130 million per year according to a 2002 report by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron Instances of minor marijuana possession would no longer affect if people can obtain jobs housing and student loans Currently there are about 2 8 million CORI records on file for a population of 6 million Small convictions have been shown to have little or no impact on drug use History edit The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse also known as the Shafer Commission was created by Public Law 91 513 in 1972 to study marijuana abuse in the United States It published its findings in a report called Marihuana A Signal of Misunderstanding and recommended that the president should decriminalize possession of marijuana in amounts that constituted simple possession 9 So far 30 non binding public policy questions calling for civil fines for possession of marijuana rather than criminal penalties have passed in legislative districts throughout Massachusetts since 2000 These questions were passed with an average of 62 of the vote in favor No Public policy question related to replacing criminal penalties with civil fines has ever failed in the state of Massachusetts 10 The Joint Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee of the Massachusetts General Court voted 6 1 in favor of a bill that would have made possession of less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine 11 Funding edit Billionaire George Soros made an initial contribution of 400 000 The committee has also received 750 000 cash as well as about 320 000 in donated time and services from the Marijuana Policy Project an organization created to reform marijuana laws in the United States According to campaign finance reports as of November 1 2008 the committee has raised approximately 1 250 000 to help pass the measure with 40 060 90 remaining 12 Opposition editThe Coalition for Safe Streets a committee organized to oppose Question 2 launched a statewide campaign Sept 5 to defeat the measure Jonathan W Blodgett the Essex County District Attorney serves as the Coalition s treasurer and chairman Michael O Keefe the president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association is opposed to the initiative He believes that the measure will lead to an increase in minors using the drug by sending the wrong message to them The O Keefe Committee is one of ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts that have contributed to the Coalition 13 William Breault chairman of the Main South Alliance for Public Safety in Worcester also plans to oppose this initiative Funding edit According to Campaign Finance reports as of November 1 2008 the ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts have contributed approximately 2 275 each to the Coalition along with a donation of 2 500 from the Worcester County Deputy Sheriffs Association as well as a few other donors for a total of approx 60 000 after expenditures they have 0 to fight the initiative and 2 601 92 in outstanding liabilities 14 Controversies editOn September 17 2008 the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy filed complaints with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance and the Attorney General s office against the Massachusetts District Attorney Association the 11 state district attorneys and O Neill and Associates a Boston public relations firm Violations of the campaign finance law could result in up to 1 year in jail and a 1 000 fine 15 16 Also Middlesex District Attorney Gerry Leone has stated that in the event the majority of voters in the State of Massachusetts were to pass the initiative he will attempt to override the vote and defeat it in an appellate process 17 Alleged Complaints edit Under Massachusetts law it is illegal to solicit receive or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited received and spent donations before they were legally allowed to attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site a violation of Massachusetts election law which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved any person may carry and use marijuana at any time which is untrue Petition drive to qualify editThe support group collected over 105 000 signatures far exceeding the requirement of 66 593 valid signatures Since Massachusetts is an indirect initiative state this meant that the Massachusetts State Legislature had to take up the proposed measure Since the legislature declined to act on it by early May the supporters then had until June 18 2008 to collect another 11 099 signatures to ensure that the initiative is placed on the November 2008 statewide ballot a goal at which they succeeded 18 19 20 Results editSensible Marijuana Policy Initiative 21 22 Choice Votes nbsp Yes 1 949 704 65 25 No 1 038 523 34 75 Valid votes 2 988 227 96 30 Invalid or blank votes 114 768 3 70 Total votes 3 102 995 100 00 Registered voters turnout 4 220 488 73 52Enactment editAs per Massachusetts law the initiative became public law on January 2 2009 30 days from the date it was presented to the Governor s Council and certified See also editMassachusetts 2008 ballot measures Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008References edit States issue verdicts on gay rights abortion NBC News 2008 11 05 Retrieved 2010 09 15 City of Worcester Council Journal for 09 09 2008 www worcesterma gov Retrieved 2020 04 02 Sensible Marijuana Policy Youth Education called strength of marijuana bill Worcester Magazine Up in Smoke The Daily Cannabinoid Massachusetts Looks To Turn Over New Leaf On Pot Aug 15 2008 WBZ TV Video Archive Boston Herald Marijuana measures head to voters Hill Jan 27 2008 Marihuana A Signal of Misunderstanding 1972 Report MPP New poll shows 71 in favor of Massachusetts decriminalization initiative Milliote Gregg Marijuana fight nears The Herald News Fall River Mass Retrieved 2007 06 06 Committee for sensible marijuana policy donations Archived 2008 10 05 at the Wayback Machine Cape Cod Today District attorney opposes decriminalization of marijuana Sep 8 2008 Coalition for safe streets finance reports Boston com Supporters of marijuana ballot question lodge complaint Sep 18 2008 Berkshire Eagle Marijuana proponents take on state attorneys Sep 18 2008 The Boston Phoenix Blunt object Sep 24 2008 Boston Globe 4 ballot petitions clear 1st obstacle Nov 24 2007 Boston Globe Proposal to decriminalize pot clears a hurdle Nov 21 2007 Massachusetts Law Updates Proposals to decriminalize marijuana February 1 2008 2008 Return of Votes Complete PDF Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth 2008 12 17 Archived from the original PDF on 2015 02 25 Retrieved 2008 11 05 Enrollment Breakdown as of 15 October 2008 PDF Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth 2008 10 30 Retrieved 2008 11 05 External links editCommittee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Sensible Marijuana Policy Ballot Language Attorney General s Opinion 07 09 Campaign finance registration statement of support committee Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Radio spot Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Television spots Retrieved from https en wikipedia org w index php title 2008 Massachusetts Question 2 amp oldid 1216902830, wikipedia, wiki, book, books, library,

article

, read, download, free, free download, mp3, video, mp4, 3gp, jpg, jpeg, gif, png, picture, music, song, movie, book, game, games.