Mühleberg Nuclear Power Plant
The Mühleberg Nuclear Power Plant (German: Kernkraftwerk Mühleberg, KKM) is a formerly operational nuclear power plant in the Mühleberg municipality in the Canton of Berne, Switzerland. Operated by BKW FMB Energie AG, the plant generated power from 6 November 1972 until 20 December 2019. Nuclear decommissioning of the plant began January 2020 and is currently forecasted to be completed by 2034.[1]
| Mühleberg Nuclear Power Plant | |
|---|---|
Mühleberg Nuclear Power Plant | |
| Country | Switzerland |
| Location | Mühleberg (BE) |
| Coordinates | 46°58′8″N 7°16′5″E / 46.96889°N 7.26806°E |
| Status | Closed and being prepared for nuclear decommissioning |
| Construction began | 1967 – 1971 |
| Commission date | 6 November 1972 |
| Decommission date | 20 December 2019 |
| Operator(s) | BKW FMB Energie AG |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | BWR |
| Reactor supplier | General Electric |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 × 355 MW |
| Make and model | 2 (Brown Boveri) |
| Nameplate capacity | 355 MW |
| Capacity factor | 95.6% |
| Annual net output | 2,973 GW·h |
| External links | |
| Website | Official website |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
History edit
Mühleberg 1 edit
In parallel with the planning of Beznau 1, the then Bernische Kraftwerke AG decided to build a second nuclear power plant in the canton of Berne. Mühleberg was identified as possible location and the Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) approved this choice on 21 July 1965. Two years later, on 21 March 1967, a first partial construction permit was issued, followed on 7 March 1968 by the final one.
The reactor entered criticality in March 1971 but, due to a fire in the turbine housing, the plant had to be shut down for repairs. It started commercial operation on 6 November 1972.[2]
KKM was the only Swiss nuclear power plant that did not have an unlimited operating license. Due to the problems noticed during the commissioning and to some ongoing tests on the emergency cooling systems performed in the United States, until 1980 it received a series of six-month license extensions, then increased to one year.[3] They were followed by a five-year, a seven-year, and a ten-year license extension. These extensions were justified by technical improvements the operator was instructed to perform.[3] The operating license was extended again in 1998 and was due to expire on 31 December 2012;[2] however, an unlimited license was granted on 21 December 2009.
The plant had requested a limitation removal in 1990 and again in 1996, but they were both rejected by the Swiss Federal Council for political and technical reasons.[3][4] A third request pending since 2005 at the SFOE was accepted on 21 December 2009.[5]
Acceptance of the power plant by the local population has varied. When KKM was built there was little opposition to nuclear energy, but the situation rapidly changed after the accident at Three Mile Island. In 1992 a public referendum in the canton of Berne rejected granting an unlimited operating license to the power plant, with 51% voting against.[3] In 2003, 68% of the population rejected the initiative named Strom ohne Atom, that proposed that the plant should be shut down by 2005 to be replaced by non-nuclear power generation.[6] A similar proposal at cantonal level had already been rejected in 2000 by 64% of voters.[7] In 2006 the Bernese government put forward a medium-term energy strategy including the renunciation to nuclear power.[8] The Swiss parliament, however, noted this and withheld its approval, delegating any decision on an eventual shutdown to the federal authorities.[9] The same organ in 2007 urged the Bernese government to work towards granting an unlimited operating license.[10]
The plant was shut down on 20 December 2019 at 12:30am local time.[11][12]
Mühleberg 2 edit
The operators, Axpo and BKW, announced through their subsidiary company, Resun AG, on 4 December 2008 that they had submitted to federal authorities a framework permit application to build two new nuclear reactors, one of which would be in Mühleberg.[13] Although precise technical specifications were not defined, the reactor of choice should be of 3rd generation light water type with a net electric power between 1200 and 1600 MW. Cooling should be ensured by a hybrid tower.[14] Following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster the permit application was suspended indefinitely.[15]
Technical specifications edit
Reactor and generators edit
The KKM consists of a single boiling water reactor (BWR) of type 4 provided by General Electric Technical Services Company (GETSCO), a then subsidiary of General Electric specialized in nuclear power plants. All the 240 assemblies contain uranium oxide rods. The pressurized vessel has a diameter of 4.04 m and is 19 m high, has a wall thickness of 10.2 cm and operates at 288 °C and 72 bar.[16]
The thermal power of 1097 MW was converted into 355 MW of net electrical power by two Brown Boveri steam turbine generators connected to the 220 kV and 50 kV grids. The power output was increased in 1990 from the original 320 MW.[17]
The system was cooled with water pumped from the Aar. This increased the river temperature by 1.3 °C, on average.[18]
| Unit | Type | Net electrical capacity | Gross electrical capacity | Construction start | Critical state | Connected to electricity grid | Commercial operation | Shutdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mühleberg | BWR | 355 MW | 372 MW | Mar. 1967 | Mar. 1971 | Jul. 1971 | Nov. 1972 | Dec. 2019 |
Safety measures edit
As with all Swiss nuclear power plants, the KKM is subjected to a periodic complete safety assessment. The most recent one took place in 2007.[19]
The reactor is hosted in a five-floor concrete-steel building. The walls have a thickness of 60 cm. In its lowest, partially underground part is located the 1.7–1.8 m thick steel and concrete pressure suppression drywell. The structure is able to withstand an earthquake. In case of a plane crash, however, the building could be damaged. The reactor would nevertheless remain intact due to the five 30–50 cm thick insoles and the massive drywell.[20]
The reactor was fed with water through two loops, each provided with its own pump. A third pump served as reserve.
The emergency cooling of the core is entrusted to three independent systems. A doubly redundant low pressure core spray with a 2·100% heat removal capacity is activated in case of leaks any size in the coolant system. Small leaks may be compensated by the redundant alternate low pressure system (ALPS).
By loss of cooling agent in the drywell, the excessive water will spread into a torus-shaped pressure-suppression pool. The 4000 m3 big torus is filled with 2000 m3 water[21] and is in turn cooled by a redundant torus cooling system and a redundant shutdown and torus cooling system with a total of 4·100% residual heat removal capacity.
Emergency power is provided through two connections with the nearby Mühleberg Hydroelectric Power Plant and three diesel generators.
In 1989, the SUSAN (Selbstständiges, unabhängiges System zur Abfuhr der Nachzerfallswärme) emergency building started operation. Bunkerized and partially underground, its function is to ensure an emergency shutdown of the reactor even in case of extreme external agents like plane crashes or simultaneous downfall of the dams upstream the plant with resulting submergence of the structures. Amongst others it contains the RCIC, the ALPS, the TCS and two of the three emergency diesel generators.
Waste management edit
The KKM yearly produces around 35–38 m3 of low and medium level radioactive waste. The waste is compressed in situ and transferred to the Central Interim Storage Facility (ZZL) in Würenlingen for conditioning. BKW-staff estimated the storage capabilities on the KKM-site to last at least until 2022. Due to the 2006 moratorium on the recycling of spent fuel, the entire stock of exhausted rods is now transferred to the ZZL for storage.[19]
Cracks in some parts edit
Major concerns about the safety of the reactor arose from the formation of cracks in the so-called core shroud inside the reactor vessel since the 1990s. This is due to steel corrosion by the coolant. Notwithstanding the countermeasures (reinforcements of the shell, chemical additives in the coolant), the cracks were increasing in length year after year. The longest crack is one third of the limit allowed by the safety specifications and it was expected that by 2012 it woulde be still less than half this value. The situation is continuously monitored and other chemical measures for its stabilization are being tested.[22]
In 1986, due to the presence of similar cracks, some components of the cooling water circulation loop had to be exchanged. A substitution of the core shroud or the pressure vessel was however not considered necessary by the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (ENSI) that confirmed that the power plant was able to operate safely at least until 2012, when the license expired provisionally.[19]
Nuclear events edit
| Year[23] | INES level | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 2015 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | TBA |
| 2014 | 8 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 8 |
| 2013 | 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 13 |
| 2008 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 2007 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 2006 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| 2005 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 2004 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 2003 | 4 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 4 |
| 2002 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| 2001 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 2000 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |
| 1999 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 |
| 1998 | – | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| 1997 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 3 |
| 1996 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2 |
| 1995 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| Sources: 2014[24] · 2013[25] · 2012[26] | |||||||||
Until the definitive shutdown in 2019, no operative nuclear event (INES level 1 or above) had occurred. Since 1995 one anomaly of INES 1 took place.
Level 1 events edit
1998 edit
- During a routine check of the reactor protection system in June 1998, a technician opened a steam relief valve in error. The steam that escaped condensed within the torus and heated the water it contained. After 14 minutes the raised temperature within the torus triggered an emergency shutdown of the reactor. The opening of the incorrect valve and the delay before the control room staff reacted appropriately led the event to be classified as INES level 1 (Swiss scale level B).[27]
Significant events before 1995 edit
- In September 1986 a faulty filter in the reconditioning unit for low and middle-active waste leaked a small quantity of radioactive aerosol. As result the surrounding area now shows an anthropogenic average dose rate of 0.0051 mSv/y (status 2007).[28] For comparison the corresponding Swiss legal limit for population exposure is 0.3 mSv/y[29] and the natural dose in the Mühleberg region achieves 1 mSv/y.[30]
- In July 1971, during systems tests prior to full commercial operation, some turbine oil ignited. The fire caused heavy damage to the turbine's housing, including cables connected to safety systems. Sufficient safety system connections remained to allow the reactor to be shut down. The nuclear part of the plant was not affected, but the power generation systems needed extensive repairs. The incident caused the start of commercial operation to be significantly delayed.[31]
March 2012: court-order to scrap the reactor edit
After the request by an anti-nuclear group the Federal Administrative Court of Switzerland ruled in March 2012 that BKW FMB Energy should shut down the reactor by mid-2013. In its rulings the court cited the incomplete repair of cracks in the structures inside the reactor. Besides this the verdict mentioned the safety concerns related to the plant's earthquake resistance.[32] Nevertheless, the Swiss NPPs - Mühleberg included - are judged to be robust against natural hazards like earthquakes by expert organisations like the ENSI and recently as well in the international peer review by the European Nuclear Security Regulators Group (ENSREG). The mentioned scrap decision was only ordered by the court under the circumstance that safe operation can't be demonstrated until mid-2013.[33]
See also edit
References edit
- ^ "Switzerland to shut down first nuclear reactor". le News. 18 December 2019. Retrieved 23 December 2019.
- ^ a b Swiss Federal Office of Energy (23 January 2006), , archived from the original on 3 October 2008, retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ a b c d Swiss Federal Council (14 December 1992), Decision of the Federal Council on the request for an unlimited operating license, retrieved 11 February 2009[permanent dead link]. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Council (28 October 1998), Decision of the Federal Council on the request for an unlimited operating license, retrieved 11 February 2009[permanent dead link]. In German.
- ^ (Press release). Swiss Federal Office of Energy. 6 May 2008. Archived from the original on 20 May 2011. Retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ . Archived from the original on 1 April 2009. Retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ . Archived from the original on 1 April 2009. Retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Executive Council of Berne (5 June 2006), (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 7 December 2008, retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Grand Council of Berne (29 November 2006), Daily journal of the November 2006 session (PDF), pp. 1007–1023, retrieved 11 February 2009[dead link]. In German.
- ^ Grand Council of Berne (29 November 2007), Daily journal of the November 2007 session (PDF), pp. 1182–1187, retrieved 11 February 2009[dead link]. In German.
- ^ "Switzerland proceeds with historic nuclear shutdown". swissinfo.ch. 20 December 2019. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
- ^ Dalton, David (28 June 2018), , NucNet, archived from the original on 21 October 2019, retrieved 21 October 2019
- ^ "Axpo and BKW submit framework permit applications for replacement nuclear power plants in Beznau and Mühleberg" (PDF) (Press release). Resun AG. 4 December 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2009.
- ^ "Technical specifications of Mühleberg 2". Resun AG. Retrieved 26 July 2011.
- ^ . Resun AG. Archived from the original on 17 February 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
- ^ BKW FMB Energie AG, (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 5 October 2007, retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Office of Energy (1 June 2008), (PDF), archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2011, retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Daniel Bernet (November 2000), Problematic points for the waters of the High Aar and its fish population (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ a b c Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (12 December 2007), Safety-Related Statement of the HSK on the Periodic Security Inspection of the Mühleberg Nuclear Power Plant (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (3 April 2003), Position of the Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate regarding the safety of the Swiss nuclear power plants in the event of an intentional aircraft crash (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ International Atomic Energy Agency (27 April 1979), Decontamination of operational nuclear power plants (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009.
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate and TÜV Energie Consult GbR (1 November 1999), Position of the HSK and the TÜV Energie Consulting on the cracks in the KKM containment vessel (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ "Nuclear events". Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate. Retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ "2014 ENSI Oversight Report – ENSI-AN-9252". Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate ENSI. 24 June 2015.
- ^ "2013 ENSI Oversight Report – ENSI-AN-8800". Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate ENSI. 30 June 2014.
- ^ (PDF). June 2013. p. 20. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 27 June 2015.
ENSI rated one event as INES Level 1 — This related to an incident at Unit 2 of the Beznau nuclear power plant where a generator failed to start during a regular function test of the energy diesel generator
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (1 April 1999), ENSI Annual Report 1998 (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (8 May 2008), ENSI Annual Report 2007 (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (1 May 2003), ENSI directive R-11 (PDF), retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate. "Dose rate baseline map of Switzerland - Muhleberg region". Retrieved 11 February 2009.[permanent dead link] In German.
- ^ Fokus Anti-Atom. "Short History of the KKM". Retrieved 11 February 2009. In German.
- ^ NHK-world (9 March 2012) Swiss court orders nuclear shutdown[permanent dead link]
- ^ News-release from "Nuklearforum"[permanent dead link]
External links edit
- . In German and French.
- Power Reactor Information System - Mühleberg[permanent dead link]